User talk:Nintendofan885

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nintendofan885!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burger King 2020.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2601:40:C003:9550:4DD0:F1A2:EDAF:5E38 23:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder[edit]

Hi Nintendofan885. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a file by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion, otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This page is not so long. We don't need to archive it now. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:07, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Oh ok but it looks you removed some stuff I added for 2021/2022 in the process --Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 11:41, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Business Meeting on a Report Recommending that the House of Representatives Cite Stephen K. Bannon for Criminal Contempt of Congress.webm

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Business Meeting on a Report Recommending that the House of Representatives Cite Stephen K. Bannon for Criminal Contempt of Congress.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:10-13-22 Select Committee Hearing.webm

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:10-13-22 Select Committee Hearing.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:WhiteHouse.gov logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cryptic-waveform (talk) 18:00, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Marszałek Artur Kosicki (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Masur (talk) 08:44, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Masur: Oh yeah. I cropped it and realised the original image was questionable a while later but forgot to tag it. Thanks for tagging! --Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 11:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--Masur (talk) 08:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Masur: Looks like you might've forgot to tag it. I also find it a bit weird you didn't notify the the original uploader as I only cropped it. --Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 11:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Something misfired here. Sorry. Masur (talk) 09:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Frost Bank Center.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Darth Stabro (talk) 01:16, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

un-archiving archived page[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Structured_data/Get_involved/Feedback_requests/Depicts&diff=875149588&oldid=781428226: what is your intent here? Do you want to revive this page? If so, do you intend to monitor it? - Jmabel ! talk 18:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly for Commons:Structured data/Get involved/Feedback requests/Depicts, Commons:Structured data/Get involved/Feedback requests/Statements, Commons:Structured data/Get involved/Feedback requests/Properties for Commons. - Jmabel ! talk 18:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: I wasn't unarchiving them. I just recategorizing them to Category:Feedback requests for Structured Data on Commons which itself is under Category:Archived pages about Structured Data on Commons due to them all being archived (because the team is defunct) and it's unnecessary to have them in the archive category if they're also in the subcat. --Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 19:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would have been useful for your edit summary to give some indication of that, even something like "more specific category". - Jmabel ! talk 21:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: Ah sorry. I used HotCat rather than editing manually so it used its default edit summary instead of giving you the option to set one. (AFAIK anyway) --Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 22:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, one of many reasons I like Cat-a-lot better. But that's an entirely reasonable explanation. - Jmabel ! talk 02:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]