User talk:Mosbatho/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mosbatho!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:03, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weil es immer um die Sache gehen sollte und ich dir zeigen wollte, dass ich dir helfen wollte: Ich hab die Datei EarthGravityPREM.svg in eine mehrsprachige umgewandelt und neben den existierenden englischen und katalonischen Übersetzungen eine deutsche hinzugefügt. Sieh dir bitte an, ob sie korrekt ist oder Du etwas aus einem anderen Grund für zu verbessern hältst. Wenn etwas zu ändern ist, musst Du im SVG-Code nach systemLanguage="de" suchen (oder direkt nach dem fehlerhaften Text). — Speravir – 23:10, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Besten Dank für die Rückmeldung! Das deutschsprachige Version sieht gelungen aus. svgtranslate.toolforge.org scheint ebenso ein brauchbares Instrument zu sein. Gruß, Mosbatho (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Danke auch von mir fürs Ansehen. Ärgerlicherweise hatte ich letztens nicht daran gedacht: Wenn du dein ursprüngliches SVG mit den Fehlern noch hast, teste doch mal, ob ein Validator was sagt. Siehe dir mal User:JoKalliauer/Optimization an (leider mit ein paar Schreibfehlern, die zum Teil das Verständnis erschweren). — Speravir – 22:56, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nachtrag: Alles korrigiert — Speravir – 18:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Die "alte" svg-Datei habe ich nicht mehr, aber diese Seite enthält Interessantes! --Mosbatho (talk) 11:50, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sag ich doch, im Prinzip :-). — Speravir – 18:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mosbatho im Jesus the photo is a Germany file and i colorized that photo now its mine (but the colorized photo) ok? some problem write in my Discussion page i dont know much about this ok? so if i need to type the link image just tell me--JesúsPeña074 (talk) 16:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jesus, thank you for your response. Another user filed a deletion request for your image, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Red Baron Colorized.jpg. It was not me. You can give a statement there. I think it is ok when you do this there in your native language. Bye, Mosbatho (talk) 13:08, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheikh Sultan Bin Zayed Fort, Al-Ain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit low resolution but good enough --PantheraLeo1359531 10:56, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jugendstil in Merikatu street - Ullanlinna - Helsinki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserschanze der Trinkwassertalsperre Eibenstock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mini4WD offends this user[edit]

Wikipedia guidelines required users to assume good faith. Your stated “doubt” is not a verifiable reference. Verifiable references are required, also. It is considered poor manners to post a long series of Deletion Requests without any evidence. Thank you, again. (Mini4WD (talk) 19:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]

For your insinuation that I am a "troll" you should apologize. I gave you the Wikipage-links on the deletion request, which you should read to understand what you did wrong with some images you have uploaded. --Mosbatho (talk) 19:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you only joined Wikipedia a month ago, learn some etiquette. Please explain how your using the word, “doubt” has any merit in Wikipedia terms. Please explain, explicitly, your concern for each instance of your Deletion Requests. Otherwise, your contribution is NOT a “discussion”. It is simply you copying and pasting all over the place. No work or effort or good faith on your part. Thank you, again. (Mini4WD (talk) 20:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Cool down and think before you start offending again. BTW, strange that you are telling me something about "etiquette" when you are insulting me as a troll which I am of course not! Moreover, you have been registered since 2015, but your experience on Commons seems very limited (less than 50 edits). I always assume good faith but telerating copyright violations on Commons is not acceptable. Please, just read the Wiki-links I gave to you on the DRs. --Mosbatho (talk) 20:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you intend to make this a long-term ordeal between us. Contrary to your accusation, I am not non-cool as I am extremely calm and only asking you calm questions that you refuse to answer. I will enjoy this game you have started. Also, you accuse me of “not thinking”. That is immature, amateur and below Wikipedia standards. If you took my question, “Are you A troll?”, as in insinuation or insult, that is your issue, since it was only a question based on evidence. Trolls copy and paste multiple times in a row and usually have new accounts. That is what you did. Be sure you have the time to provide proof of all your current and future contributions to Wikipedia. I am recording all of your deletions and editing of my own discussion words, even though it is recorded here on Wikipedia. I am confident that you will continue deleting my own discussion words. Go for it. (Mini4WD (talk) 20:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Sorry, but I think I cannot help you and a few words of apology by you can also not be expected. Have nice a nice live! --Mosbatho (talk) 20:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Report the user to the admins.[edit]

Hello Mosbatho.

It had came to my attention that the Mini4WD guy had unfortunately attacked you (on both this talk page and the deletion nomination pages of the marked images) for simply marking his image uploads for deletion. I suggest that you should report them to the admin, as this user's behavior is unacceptable.

Yuuyatails (talk) 17:15, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Yuuyatails, I am not quite clear how such a process is initiated and which goal should come out in the end. In addition, a Commons-Admin (User:Achim55) posted a comment on all deletion requests that are connected with Mini4WD. Achims comments support my requests, but this admin could have already initiated something. But nothing happened, Mini4WD was not contacted regarding its behavior. This leads to the conclusion that any action would be without any effect.
All in all, a behavior like Mini4WD shows is very unfortunate, because we Commons-users do not communicate with each other with such abusive words. After all, everyone is active here voluntarily.
Yours faithfully, Mosbatho (talk) 19:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musée de la Révolution française - exterior view, 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 23:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park of Domaine de Vizille in 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted and needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 09:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, there was some potential. So, I uploaded a new, modified version of that image. What do you think? --Mosbatho 11:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Much better --Poco a poco 11:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portão do Mar in Velas, São Jorge, Portugal, 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Looks fine to me. --Vincent60030 09:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Episcopal Summer Palace in Bratislava, in 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:26, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pionierlandungsboot 41, Mahnmalanlage Flucht und Vertreibung Oberschleißheim.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rainer Halama 18:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, dear Mosbatho.

Could you look at this picture on nomination page. What do you think about it? --Kirill Borisenko (talk) 19:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kirill! This is a very interesting image. Unfortunately you can see a blur on the right side windows, which is possibly caused by the CCD chip of the cell phone camera. But this can be improved with image postprocessing. --Mosbatho (talk) 17:41, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuer Altar in Mariendom in Linz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hanooz 09:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Mosbatho,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Seminární zahrada, Český Krumlov, Czechia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 21:27, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

not in Austria[edit]

sorry, my comment was missleading [1], the template {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2020|at}} is not valid in Austria, participation on WLM 2020 in Austria is just a tradeoff of participation in WikiDaheim 2020, which uses the template {{WikiDaheim|2020|at|topic=Cultural heritage monuments}} only. beautiful image btw --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Herzi Pinki, thank you for your response! Now I understand what you have meant. At first, I found it strange that the city of Linz would not be located in Austria. But, all is well now! Best regards and thank you! --Mosbatho (talk) 16:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mil Mi-1M General Purpose Light Helicopter, at the Ukrainian State Aviation Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp and good image. The background is a bit cluttered, but this was unavoidable here. --Cayambe 07:54, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]