User talk:Moreau.henri/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 11:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Victor Segalen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
El Funcionario (talk) 21:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Le dolmen de Kerbalanec 1900.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Piero~commonswiki (talk) 04:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Saint-Germain Coiffe de Bannalec.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Saint-Germain Coiffe de Bannalec.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Carte postale de propagande du parti autonomiste breton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bzh-99 (talk) 17:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A.Savin 16:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Femme de Scaër.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Femme de Scaër.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 14:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Obviously you did not paint this so the details need to be corrected. I've added the creators details that I can find online but cannot find a death date for Auguste Renan, the brother who painted this according this webpage. I presume it was before 1900 because I don't see any mention of Auguste after 1888. Your image is essentially a slavish copy of a 2D painting, so you cannot claim copyright of the image which is in the public domain and retains the copyright of the original, so we need to add the correct copyright tag. I assume {{PD-old-100-1923}} but maybe you can provide some more details of the painting and the artist. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 10:02, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Plouyé 28 Le monument aux morts.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 11:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Bibracte
Bonjour !
Je viens de consulter votre cliché File:Mont-Beuvray - 13.jpg (merci pour la photo !) et je m'interrogeais. Je ne sais si vous un êtes un spécialiste, ou si vous passiez juste dans le coin, mais sauriez-vous si la maison dont vous avez photographié les vestiges est bien éduenne comme cela est évoqué sur Wikipédia, ou s'il s'agit plutôt, comme je le pense, d'une maison romaine postérieure ?
Merci beaucoup ! --CRH (talk) 14:57, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Saint-Joachim extraction de la tourbe coupage.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 16:45, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
File:L'Aber Benoît 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 15:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Pentrez pas Roscanvel
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:206_Roscanvel.jpg montre non Roscanvel mais Pentrez.
J'ai mis à jour https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roscanvel#Situation.
Je vous laisse renommer votre fichier pour éviter toute confusion et ajouter la photo sur la page correspondante (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint-Nic). On reconnaît notamment le bunker https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=pentrez#map=17/48.19450/-4.30268. --OuiQui (talk) 20:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Finistère, vues photographiques
Bonjour, Pourriez-vous corriger les informations pour les images que vous avez importées de Gallica. Il faut corriger l'auteur, la date, la licence, et la source : [1]. En plus, une version en haute résolution est disponible pour chacune d'elles (i.e. [2]). Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
File:117 Maurice Denis Portrait de l'artiste.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
clpo13(talk) 21:17, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Help vote. Thanks you. Pv sindhu (talk) 05:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Goulien Pelras.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Goulien Pelras.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Goulien Pelras.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
File:36 Ile Longue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Prawdziwy Mikołajek (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:324 Jean Moulin Paysage mauvais.jpg
- File:325 Tristan Corbière Armor Romanin.jpg
- File:326 Jean Moulin Jeunes mariés portant la statue de sainte Anne.jpg
Yours sincerely, AntonierCH (d) 06:28, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Postcards
Hello Moreau.henri, thanks for uploading postcards on commons. Maybe you are interested in COM:WPPC. Best regards -- sk (talk) 04:29, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:000 Tbilissi vers 1880.JPG
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:000 Tbilissi vers 1880.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:000 Tbilissi vers 1880.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:15, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Forêt de La Guerche Google Earth.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Forêt de La Guerche Google Earth.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Forêt de La Guerche Google Earth.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 14:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Forêt de Chevré Google Earth.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 14:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Forêt du Pertre Google Earth.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Forêt du Pertre Google Earth.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Forêt du Pertre Google Earth.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted content
File:Forêt du Pertre Google Earth.jpg
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Forêt de Chevré 1 Google Earth.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Bonjour, comme dit plus haut, les captures d'écrans de Google Earth ne sont pas libres de droit. Pour illustrer un article avec une carte détaillée, par exemple concernant cette forêt, vous pouvez en demander la création dans l'Atelier graphique du Wikipédia français. Sinon, en général, les coordonnées géographiques dans l'infobox suffisent à localiser l'objet de l'article; ici la forêt de Chevré. Bien à vous TouN (talk) 15:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
File:029 Le logo de la commune de Botmeur.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Glorious 93 (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Import d'images depuis la bibliothèque numérique de la BnF (Gallica)
Bonjour,
Ayant constaté que vous avez à de multiples reprises importé sur Wikimedia Commons des iconographies provenant de la bibliothèque numérique de la Bibliothèque nationale de France (c'est-à-dire de Gallica) dans une résolution de basse qualité, je me permets de vous signaler que toutes les œuvres consultables sur Gallica sont disponibles au téléchargement en haute définition sur ce même site.
Pour cela, je vous invite à consulter les pages de documentation suivantes se rapportant à ce sujet : Commons:Gallica/fr et Wikisource:Gallica.
Aussi, n'hésitez pas à me laisser un message sur ma page de discussion en cas de problème.
Cordialement, Pygoscelis antarcticus (talk) 20:26, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Paule_(Côtes-d'Armor)#/media/Fichier:012_Canal_Paule_près_La_Pie
Bonjour monsieur Moreau,
La commune de Paule organise avec l'association Lum & Style, des concerts à l'égise de Lansalaün. J'aimerai échanger avec vous concernant l'utilisation de votre image du canal à La Pie.
Bien cordialement, Morgane Louarn — Preceding unsigned comment added by MÔdeKerfautras (talk • contribs) 08:01, 6 July 2021 (UTC) Comme vous ne me donnez pas vos cooedonnées, je ne peux pas vous répondre.
Henri MOREAU 03:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
We need your feedback!
Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!
I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.
We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.
Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.
Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.
Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Rehabmamet (talk) 16:05, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rehabmamet (talk) 16:08, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rehabmamet (talk) 16:10, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rehabmamet (talk) 16:12, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Illustration de Gilliatt par Achille Granchi-Taylor
Bonjour,
Vous semblez avoir posté cette illustration dans la page dédiée aux Travailleurs de la mer. Je cherche cette illustration en grand format, savez-vous où je peux trouver cela ?
Merci par avance,
Cordialement. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:E34:EE48:62E0:A542:17AB:6E96:B3AB (talk) 22:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Saint-Jean-Trolimon menhir
Bonjour Monsieur Moreau, c'est en parcourant la page sur Saint Jean Trolimon, que je me suis rendu compte que la photographie légendée "Un menhir à Saint-Jean-Trolimon" (carte postale ND Photo, avant 1914) présente en fait le menhir (encore debout) de Kerscaven situé sur la commune de Penmarc'h dont je suis originaire.
voici un cliché plus actuel du même menhir.
et le lien vers la page dédiée à ce menhir: https://monumentum.fr/deuxieme-menhir-kerscaven-pa00090155.html
Je n'ai pas pris l'initiative de supprimer le cliché, et vous en laisse le soins.
Bien cordialement
Lize56 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lize56 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Meilleure version
Bonjour,
Pour information, je viens de corriger un peu les métadonnées et surtout d'importer une nouvelle version du fichier File:015 Paul Gruyer Scène de marché au Huelgoat vers 1900.JPG. "Meilleure" est toujours un peu subjectif, si jamais tu préfère l'ancienne version, n'hésite pas à le dire, je scinderais le fichier.
Cdlt, VIGNERON en résidence (talk) 12:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Erreur localisation
Bonjour La photo https://frwiki.fr/b/91004 ne représente pas la Pointe de Kerjean à Trégunc mais l'île de Raguénès à Névez. Cordialement RP 2A01:CB08:858C:3E00:94E:22A:D3F8:3DAA 09:34, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 00:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)