User talk:Michielverbeek/Archief25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationaal Park Duinen van Texel, duingebied richting Strandpaal 12 IMG 6332 2020-06-08 12.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oudeschild, rondvaartboot de TX10 IMG 6194 2020-06-08 09.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good but right side leaning in --Poco a poco 15:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, you are right. I have ✓ Done improved perspective and did some crop corrections --Michielverbeek 20:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midden Eierland, Dit Eiland is Coronavrij IMG 6064 2020-06-07 13.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Zuid Eierland en De Koog, schapen in de wei IMG 5999 2020-06-07 10.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Domob 07:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationaal Park Duinen van Texel, bospad langs Nattevlakweg bij Turfveld IMG 6401 2020-06-08 14.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationaal Park Duinen van Texel, bospad bij de Westerslag IMG 6405 2020-06-08 14.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationaal Park Duinen van Texel, Schotse Hooglander IMG 6419 2020-06-08 15.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lochem, kunstwerk het Labyrinth van Shlomo Koren IMG 5632 2020-05-31 07.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lochem, de Exelsebrug IMG 5639 2020-05-31 08.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vorden, huis Vorden RM526292 IMG 5859 2020-06-01 08.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:38, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steenderen, de Bronkhorster Molen RM34543 IMG 5874 2020-06-01 09.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:38, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijverdal, de Sint- Antonius van Paduakerk GM0163WN07 IMG 5727 2020-05-31 11.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wierden, de Sint Jan de Doperkerk IMG 5743 2020-05-31 12.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Holten en Nijverdal, bomen in de Sallandse Heuvelrug IMG 5699 2020-05-31 10.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationaal Park Duinen van Texel, bosgebied aan het begin richting Strandpaal 12 IMG 6326 2020-06-08 12.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hengelo, de toren van het stadhuis RM532134 IMG 5827 2020-05-31 16.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --EV Raudtee 17:33, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delden, de Blasiuskerk RM34149 IMG 5848 2020-05-31 17.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:26, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goor, sculptuur van de geschiedenis van Goor IMG 5853 2020-05-31 18.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 17:12, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Almelo, het Twentekanaal (zijkanaal naar Almelo) vanaf de Wierdensebrug IMG 5748 2020-05-31 12.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 03:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Almelo, restaurant in voormalige fabriek IMG 5759 2020-05-31 13.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 03:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Almelo, sculptuur van een vogel bij het Marktplein IMG 5768 2020-05-31 13.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 03:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zenderen, restaurant in voormalige kapel IMG 5794 2020-05-31 14.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 03:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oosterend, de Hervormde kerk RM35221 IMG 6124 2020-06-07 15.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Good in general, but seems a bit too dark. Can you please try making it a bit brighter (ideally with some kind of highlight compression so the sky is not blown)? --Domob 16:13, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I have ✓ Done made it a bit brighter. Please realize that just after I took this photo it started to rain for some minutes --Michielverbeek 19:09, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks, good quality --Domob 06:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationaal Park Duinen van Texel, duingebied richting Strandpaal 12 IMG 6337 2020-06-08 13.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationaal Park Duinen van Texel, bosgebied bij Jan Ayeslag - Nattevlakweg IMG 6365 2020-06-08 13.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Weak  Support Sharpness isn't the best. --XRay 04:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Holten en Laren, de Schipbeek vanaf de Larenseweg IMG 5659 2020-05-31 08.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --ZI Jony 13:47, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Holten en Nijverdal, bomen in de Sallandse Heuvelrug IMG 5686 2020-05-31 10.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --ZI Jony 13:47, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utrecht, de Ulu Camii moskee IMG 6457 2020-07-12 10.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:36, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odijk, kunstwerk (Drie stenen) bij het gemeentehuis gemaakt door Hans Leutscher IMG 6467 2020-07-12 12.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:37, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heelsum, oorlogsmonument war-memo321 IMG 6589 2020-07-12 18.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:01, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doorn, de Dartheide IMG 6518 2020-07-12 14.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 09:03, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Amerongen en Elst, het Amerongse bos IMG 6558 2020-07-12 16.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leersum, de Michaëlskerk RM24078 IMG 6533 2020-07-12 15.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amerongen, de Andrieskerk RM7755 IMG 6547 2020-07-12 15.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Just above the bar due to the lack of sharpness on top --Poco a poco 08:48, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elst-Utr, landgoed De Tangh IMG 6570 2020-07-12 16.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support QI but please check whether the spot on the top right on the right is a cloud or dust --Poco a poco 08:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I dont't see anything special at the right, please add a note --Michielverbeek 09:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilthoven, landgoed Jagtlust (het huidige gemeentehuis) IMG 6463 2020-07-12 11.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:05, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horn, beltmolen de Hoop RM22632 IMG 6598 2020-07-19 09.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 13:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horn, beltmolen de Hoop RM22632 IMG 6605 2020-07-19 09.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 13:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neeritter, de Sint-Lambertuskerk RM22863 IMG 6616 2020-07-19 11.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 13:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baexem, standerdmolen de Aurora IMG RM8574 6720 2020-07-19 18.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:20, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kessenich, parochiekerk Sint Martinus oeg86080 IMG 6627 2020-07-19 11.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nearly good quality. So it's a promotion in advance. Please check your photograph, it's a little bit too dark. --XRay 11:58, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I have made the photo much darker because the sky was too white. However I understand I have exaggerate this too much. I have uploaded ✓ Done a new version --Michielverbeek 12:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voorshoven, kapel Onze Lieve Vrouw van Banneux aan de Vennendijk-Schansweg IMG 6672 2020-07-19 13.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:41, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Solt, voetgangersbrug Gruitrode-Solt IMG 6681 2020-07-19 14.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:41, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cothen, de Sint-Petrus en Pauluskerk GM0352-7 IMG 6509 2020-07-12 13.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Edges are soft, but that would be acceptable for me. However there is also some white artifact from edition close to the top of tower roof. Please fix --Jakubhal 11:15, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I have removed ✓ Done this error --Michielverbeek 19:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Werkhoven, de RK kerk OLV Maria Hemelvaart GM 0312-WN056 IMG 6478 2020-07-12 13.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020[edit]

Hallo Michielverbeek,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oldenzaal, de Sint-Plechelmusbasiliek RM31419 IMG 6729 2020-07-30 10.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality. --PtrQs 23:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beuningen, de Onze Lieve Vrouwekerk IMG 7072 2020-08-06 09.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Denekamp, de toren van de Sint Nicolaaskerk RM12330 IMG 7081 2020-08-06 09.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Noord-Deuningen en Nordhorn, de Rammelbeek - de grens met Duitsland IMG 7089 2020-08-06 10.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Borgholzhausen, woonhuis in panorama IMG 6874 2020-07-31 14.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image sharpness[edit]

Hi there! I have recently seen your review on my nomination of a bubble tea picture and I was wondering if you can give me a better insight on sharpness since based on my judgement it looks sharp to me. Vincent60030 (talk) 17:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's very difficult to make a Q1photo with an iphone (but it is not impossible). The exposure time is 1/20 and that must be much shorter unless you are using a tripod. I guess a much higher f-value would have given more sharpness to the whole photo. And generally ISO250 gives too much noise in the photo however I guess in this case it is not a serious problem. I don't think you have shut the photo in RAW in stead of JPEG and that you have not used any software program like Lightroom/Photoshop. In RAW and with those kind of programs it is possible to sharpen the photo and to reduce the noise. --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm still using an Iphone 6 so not too many options available for 26mm lens. I've tried a shorter exposure time today on another dish but the results were quite egregious - blur picture. I'll figure out something, or just clean my lense. HAHAHA; as for photo editing, I use GIMP to help with sharpness and noise reduction based on youtube tutorials. Davies Media Design and Pixovert are my go-tos but they dont work on the images I edit usually. Any other recommendations for beginners? Also I want to state that I am colourblind so it may affect my judgement on RGBs. Thank you very much for taking the time :D Vincent60030 (talk) 08:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Borgholzhausen-Ostbarthausen, akker IMG 6866 2020-07-31 14.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Rheine-Rodde, spoorbrug over Dortmund-Emskanaal IMG 6774 2020-07-30 15.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ibbenbüren-Laggenbeck, die römisch-katholische St.-Maria-Magdalena-Kirche IMG 6794 2020-07-30 16.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schüttorf, Turm der reformierte Kirche IMG 7051 2020-08-02 16.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 23:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Gildehaus en De Lutte, waarschuwingsbord voor de eikenprocessierups IMG 4009 2020-08-10 16.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting image and good quality -- Spurzem 20:37, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westerkappeln-Hollenbergs Hügel, panorama vanaf de Ibbenbürener Strasse IMG 7339 2020-08-10 11.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oldenzaal, de watertoren IMG 7374 2020-08-10 17.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too harsh CA correction resulted in a white rim on the right side of the tower. Could you please reduce this? --PtrQs 23:11, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Total new version ✓ Done from RAWfile, highlights reduction to reduce the white rim --Michielverbeek 21:06, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Even better contrast now - Good Quality --PtrQs 22:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dissen am Teutoburger Wald, die Mauritiuskirche IMG 6845 2020-07-31 13.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Melle-Wellingholzhausen, zicht op Brandhorstweg IMG 6885 2020-07-31 15.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melle-Wellingholzhausen, die Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche IMG 6896 2020-07-31 15.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:28, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perspective Correction[edit]

Hi, I could try to fix the geometry of your withdrawn QI nomination Kloster Ohrbeck if you allow me to upload the result as a new version. You can easily revert to the original version if you don't like the new one - it's your image. Of course, the correction will work only if there are no other problems than perspective and barrel distortion. --JRff (talk) 18:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC) No problem, just try it, success! --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just uploaded the new version. Please have a look on it. It was not an easy case, I must say. And, if I compare the walls and pillars near some lanterns with the lanterns themselves, I come to conclusions that people in that region do not seem to be able to install all their lanterns in completely upright position. Yet I hope the result is more satisfactory than the original version. Judging from the EXIF data, I assume that you already applied transformations to the first version uploaded. Corrections with Hugin work best when applied to the orignal Camera file. So results might not be completely optimal for that reason. Anyway - I hope it helped. --JRff (talk) 07:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glandorf, die Sankt Johannis Kirche IMG 6955 2020-08-01 12.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fürstenau-Schwagstorf, die Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche IMG 7313 2020-08-09 13.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merzen, die Sankt Lambertus Kirche IMG 7319 2020-08-09 14.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:01, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bramsche, die Sankt Martinus Kirche IMG 7328 2020-08-09 15.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Georgsmarienhütte-Oesede, die Sankt Peter und Paul Kirche IMG 6801 2020-07-31 09.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ueffeln, die evangelische Kirche Sankt Marien IMG 7325 2020-08-09 15.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Lutte, de Plechelmuskerk GM0168-WN023 IMG 6742 2020-07-30 11.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment 1 The building is tilted clockwise (fixable). 2 The sharpness is falling towards the top of the tower, it is relatively weak on the roof of the tower (not fixable, but quite acceptable in this case). The image can be promoted after a correction of verticals. --Dmitry Ivanov 07:52, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did ✓ Done a small perspective correction --Michielverbeek 20:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC  Support Oh... These high towers... Now the "visual geometry" looks satisfactory. OI. --Dmitry Ivanov 21:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC).
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Dissen en Hilter am Teutoburger Wald, akker IMG 6839 2020-07-31 12.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheine, die Sankt Antonius Basilika Dm28 IMG 7355 2020-08-10 13.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 22:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Georgsmarienhütte-Holzhausen, Klosterkirche und Kloster Ohrbeck IMG 6924 2020-08-01 09.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Leaning vertical lines need correction. --Johannes Robalotoff 08:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your review but distortion is too serious for reparation --Michielverbeek 21:13, 31 August 2020 (UTC)  Comment Really? I did not expect this. Did you try it with the program Hugin? --Johannes Robalotoff 16:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, I am not used to stitch photos. --Michielverbeek 19:14, 1 September 2020 (UTC)  Comment It's not only for stitching, also for perspective corrections on single images. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
New version uploaded ✓ Done by Johannes, please give new review by somebody else --Michielverbeek 17:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 17:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good image quality. --Tagooty 10:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Haselünne en Dohren, die Hase IMG 7223 2020-08-07 16.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotte, die evangelische Pfarrkirche Dm1 IMG 7003 2020-08-02 10.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 06:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordhorn, die Alte Kirche am Markt Dm48531 IMG 7098 2020-08-06 11.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fürstenau, die Anterpforte (Hohes Tor) Dm IMG 7211 2020-08-07 14.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 06:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osnabrück, die Johannis Kapelle IMG 6920 2020-08-01 09.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lingen, die evangelisch-reformierte Kirche gespiegeld in de ramen van die Kornblume IMG 7118 2020-08-06 14.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:58, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sögel, blauwe schapen op de rotonde IMG 7275 2020-08-08 13.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haren, die Mersmühle IMG 7300 2020-08-08 16.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meppen, die Prostei Kirche IMG 7123 2020-08-06 16.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 11:34, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gersten, die Herz Jesu Kirche IMG 7174 2020-08-07 11.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lengerich, die Sankt Benedict Kirche IMG 7190 2020-08-07 12.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andervenne, die Sankt Andreas Kirche IMG 7200 2020-08-07 13.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dohren, die Sankt Bernardus Kirche IMG 7219 2020-08-07 16.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meppen-Helte, bushalte IMG 7130 2020-08-07 09.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haselünne, die Sankt Vincentius Kirche IMG 7229 2020-08-07 17.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klein Berssen, die Herz Jesu Kirche IMG 7257 2020-08-08 12.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sögel, de toren van de Sankt Jakobus Kirche IMG 7270 2020-08-08 13.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lathen, Pfarrkirche Sankt Vitus IMG 7281 2020-08-08 14.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haren, die Sankt Martinus Kirche IMG 7309 2020-08-08 16.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Bawinkel en Helte, bosgebied IMG 7156 2020-08-07 10.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Westerlohmühlen en Klein Berssen, bosgebied IMG 7247 2020-08-08 11.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Lingen en Nordhorn, het Ems-Vechtekanaal IMG 7117 2020-08-06 12.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Haren en Lathen, het Dortmund-Emskanaal vanaf de Hünteler Brook IMG 7295 2020-08-08 15.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raamsdonkveer, de watertoren RM520055 IMG 7390 2020-09-13 11.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waspik, de Hervormde kerk RM38393 IMG 7427 2020-09-13 12.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 21:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sprang Capelle, de protestante kerk De Brug IMG 7437 2020-09-13 13.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 21:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vlijmen, de Sint Jan Geboortekerk vanaf het Van Greunsvenpark RM37871 IMG 7476 2020-09-13 16.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:48, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valkenswaard, tijdelijke sculpturen op de Hofnar IMG 7486 2020-09-14 11.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bladel, de toren van de vroegere kerk van Sint Petrus'Banden RM9576 IMG 7519 2020-09-14 14.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bladel, het gemeentehuis IMG 7529 2020-09-14 14.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lage Mierden, Rooms Katholieke kerk van Sint Stephanus RM22236 IMG 7546 2020-09-14 15.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergeijk, de Sint-Petrus' Bandenkerk of de Hofkerk RM9258 IMG 7498 2020-09-14 12.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esbeek, standbeeld van baron Edward Remy in de tuin van Huize Rustoord MG 7548 2020-09-14 15.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esbeek, de Sint Adrianuskerk RM518903 IMG 7562 2020-09-14 16.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:11, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diessen, de Sint-Willibrorduskerk RM12898 IMG 7585 2020-09-14 16.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hilvarenbeek, windmolen De Doornboom RM22144 IMG 7588 2020-09-14 17.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goirle, windmolen De Visscher RM16529 IMG 7601 2020-09-14 17.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 08:11, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goirle, de Sint-Johannes Onthoofdingkerk RM16526 IMG 7605 2020-09-14 18.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 08:11, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eersel, de Sint-Willibrorduskerk RM517808 IMG 7505 2020-09-14 13.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could be a bit sharper but good enough imo. Can you lift the shadows? --Trougnouf 14:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for review, I have ✓ Done a shadow reducement --Michielverbeek 20:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Much better, thank you ! --Trougnouf 22:07, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damwoude, de kerk van Akkerwoude RM IMG 7662 2020-09-20 13.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:05, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leeuwarden, Us Mem van Gerhardus Jan Adema IMG 7764 2020-09-20 18.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dokkum, de Drie Figuren van Jaap van der Meij IMG 7669 2020-09-20 13.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --IntelTesla 17:57, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dokkum, korenmolen de Hoop RM13186 IMG 7679 2020-09-20 13.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --IntelTesla 15:53, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dokkum, straatzicht Suupmarkt met RM13187 IMG 7697 2020-09-20 14.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dokkum, de IJsfontein van Birthe Leemeijer IMG 7703 2020-09-20 14.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reitsum, de Hervormde kerk IMG 7733 2020-09-20 16.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Bartlehiem, de Dokkumer Ee IMG 7741 2020-09-20 16.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Tichelwerk, de Dokkumer Ee IMG 7748 2020-09-20 17.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bimmen, die Sankt Martinuskirche Dm34 IMG 7924 2020-11-07 14.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:07, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Persingen, de voormalige dorpskerk RM35825 IMG 7856 2020-11-07 11.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Michielverbeek,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ooij, de Sint-Hubertuskerk GM0282-12088 in dorpszicht IMG 7842 2020-11-07 10.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niel, die Sankt Bonifatiuskirche Dm29 IMG 7928 2020-11-07 14.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:36, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2020/2021![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Michielverbeek! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:45, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Happy holidays 2020/21![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2021, Michiel! *  
  • Vrolijk Kerstfeest en een Gelukkig Nieuwjaar!
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr!

   -- Dietmar, 25 December 2020

Viele Dank und auch für dich!

Happy New year 2021[edit]

  * Happy New year 2021" Michielverbeek! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

--Pierre André (talk) 11:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and also a Happy 2021!