User talk:Johannes Robalotoff

Willkommen auf Commons, Johannes Robalotoff!

Erste Schritte Unser Ratgeber Erste Schritte und unsere FAQ können Dir nach Deiner Anmeldung hilfreich sein. Sie erklären, wie Du die Benutzeroberfläche anpassen und zum Beispiel auf Deine Muttersprache umstellen kannst. Auch erklären sie, wie Du Dateien hochladen kannst. Daneben erläutern sie unsere grundlegende Lizenzpolitik. Du benötigst keine besonderen technischen Kenntnisse, um hier mitzumachen. Sei mutig hier beizutragen und gehe von gutem Willen aus bei den Absichten anderer. Dies ist ein Wiki - es ist wirklich einfach. Hilfe bekommen Mehr Informationen bekommst Du im Gemeinschaftsportal. Du kannst Fragen im Forum oder im IRC-Chat #wikimedia-commons stellen. Du kannst auch einen Administrator auf seiner Diskussionsseite ansprechen. Sofern Du eine spezielle Frage zum Urheberrecht hast, frage auf der Seite Diskussionsseite:Lizenzen.		Tips, Tricks und Spielzeuge Setze Babelvorlagen auf Deine Benutzerseite, so dass andere sehen können, in welcher Sprache sie Dich ansprechen können, und zeige deine grafischen Fähigkeiten. Alle Deine hochgeladenen Dateien sind in Deiner persönlichen Benutzergalerie einsehbar. Trage dazu im Feld User Deinen Benutzernamen ein und bestätige mit ENTER. Bitte unterschreibe auf Diskussionsseiten, indem Du ~~~~ tippst. Verwende das CommonSense-Werkzeug, um geeignete Kategorien für Deine Dateien zu finden (damit andere Leute sie ebenfalls auffinden können!). Um auf eine Bildbeschreibungsseite zu verlinken, schreibe dies:[[:Image:Foo.jpg]], so dass dies angezeigt wird: Image:Foo.jpg Sofern Du Dateien aus einem anderen Projekt überträgst, verwende bitte immer das Werkzeug CommonsHelper. Hast Du einen Fehler gemacht? Wolltest Du eine Datei umbenennen oder sie verschieben? Lade sie einfach erneut hoch und markiere die alte Datei mit {{bad name|Richtiger Name}} Ausführliche Informationen findest Du auf der Seite Löschrichtlinien.
(P.S. Möchtest Du diese Nachricht kommentieren?)

-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 09:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Johannes, schön das Du bei uns hier auf den Commons mitmachst (und das ja schon länger!). Hast Du nicht Lust, mal eine Benutzerseite anzulegen, so mit ein paar Babelbausteinen und einem Link auf Deine deutsche Benutzerseite? Dann hätten alle anderen Commoner ja auch mal ein paar Informationen. Ich habe schon daran gedacht, Dir vielleicht den Willkommensbaustein mit den Links hier zu verbauen, aber da Du ja schon länger und gut mitarbeitest, ist das ja wahrscheinlich nicht nötig. Vielen Dank für Deine Fotos übrigens, ich habe eben mal eins gesehen. Schöne Grüße, Longbow4u 20:39, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Deprecated lang templates

Hi,
Thank you for using language templates. However, I wanted to let you know that templates like {{English}}, {{Deutsch}}, etc. are now deprecated and should not be used any more.
Instead, you are encouraged to use {{en|Your English text}}, {{de|your German text}}, etc.
Thanks agains and best regards from France, have fun uploading and editing here :)
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 09:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your hint. I will use the new templates with my future pictures and gradually replace templates for older ones. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome!

Happy editing and uploading then :)

-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 12:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Fotos von Burgen in Hessen für Buchprojekt

Hallo, Herr Robalotoff! Für ein wissenschaftliches Buchprojekt über eine mittelalterliche Handschrift suche ich gute Fotos von bestimmten hessischen Burgen. Bei Ihnen fand ich folgende Fotos, die mich interessieren: Burg Falkenstein (10a-JR-16.8.2001), Burgruine Hattstein (28.3.2004), Burg Eppstein von Nordwesten (2.6.2002), Burg Münzenberg von Südosten (15.9.2003), Burg Reifenberg (26.5.2002). Könnten Sie mit mir Kontakt aufnehmen unter k.deissner(at)universitaetsdruckerei.de ? Dann könnten wir klären, wie ich an die Originaldaten in möglichst guter Auflösung kommen kann - und Ihre Bilder bekämen einen schönen Platz in einem tollen Buch! Freue mich auf Ihre Antwort... Gruß, K.D.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Bad-Homburg-Oberes-Tor-JR-G6-1807-2007-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. For documentation it would be interesting to have a separate closeup image of the "coats of arms area" since the golden inscription in this image is hardly readable. --Iotatau 22:13, 13 September 2009 (UTC)  Comment For documentation it's also good to add geocoding --Berthold Werner 06:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Geocoding is added now. I will look for the closeup in my image archive. Not sure if I have one. --Johannes Robalotoff 07:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine-Landstein-JR-G6-1367-2006-10-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Cayambe 07:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weisser-Turm-Bad-Homburg-JR-G6-1766-2007-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glaskopf-JR-G6-3147-3153-2009-05-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support} Bit dizzy, otherwise good. -- H005 22:11, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche-Habenscheid-JR-G6-3792-2009-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Oberneisen-JR-G6-3652-2009-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good explanation, good work --Archaeodontosaurus 09:19, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elisabethenbrunnen-Bad-Homburg-JR-G6-1793-2007-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a CA-like effect at the leftmost column, but still ok for QI imho --Berthold Werner 09:29, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schoenburg-Hoher-Mantel-JR-G6-4185-2009-09-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 17:46, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Ardeck-Holzheim-JR-G6-3692-2009-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good... --Cayambe 20:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Ardeck-Holzheim-JR-G6-3717-2009-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ... and also good. --Cayambe 20:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaiser-Wilhelms-Bad-JR-G6-1796-2007-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Cayambe 15:51, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Bad-Homburg-Libanon-Zeder-JR-G6-1752-2007-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice clean, clear image -Herbythyme 14:34, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark-Bad-Homburg-JR-G6-1773-2007-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Definitely QI for me, although the image would benefit from a crop of the lower part of the lake, just above the top of the disturbing plant in the middle. --Cayambe 08:54, 18 October 2009 (UTC)  Info I tried the crop above the plant in the middle, but found that I loose to much of the lake then. So it's a tradeoff with this plant. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:22, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Goarshausen-JR-G6-4201-2009-09-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments could be a bit crisper in full solution but still QI because of composition and colours imo --Mbdortmund 12:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)  Info I think that the main subjects, the tower and the houses in the town as well as the castle are quite sharp. On the other hand I agree that the trees and the rocks on the mountain could really be 'crisper' at full resolution. I found out that the crispiness is lost here in the noise reduction component of Canon's RAW file converter. It treats the fine structures of distant plants like noise. Therefore buildings and cars appear 'crispier' than vegetation. Unfortunatly the software does not alow me to control the noise reduction algorithm. So I can only ask you, if this is really an issue for you or not. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:59, 31 October 2009 (UTC) I think this photo meets QI requirements. P.S. You can try and another RAW converter such as Adobe's RAW. - Darius Baužys 13:10, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 25-Pfennig-Coin-Deutsches-Reich-1912-F-JR-4403-4406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good macro. --Iotatau 19:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 25-Pfennig-Coin-Deutsches-Reich-1912-F-JR-4403-4406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good macro. --Iotatau 19:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Kronberg-JR-E-65-2010-04-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:08, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Koenigstein-JR-E-106-2010-04-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice photo, but maybe crop out the rooftops from the bottom? Jafeluv 21:34, 12 May 2010 (UTC)  Done Did the suggested crop. Please review again. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:23, 13 May 2010 (UTC) Ok to me now. --Cayambe 13:26, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

perspective correction

Many thanks for your perspective correction of my CoA of Paris, now promoted as QI ! Ok, I have to download the tool, but I'm not sure that I could understand how using it...I'll try ! Friendly from Paris,---Jebulon (talk) 19:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

You' re welcome! It was somewhat pedantic by me anyway to ask for a correction of this picture, because the original geometry was already almost OK :-) So I felt obliged to show what I meant... Many people won't see the difference. It is only obvious on the monitor at full resolution. --JRff (talk) 21:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Same subject, a month later...

first, many thanks for your kind reviews, it's very interesting to me

Perspective distortion is (was ?) a great problem to me, because I work on Mac, and there are not many freewares except Hugin. I've downloaded it, but I'm absolutely unable to use it, I don't understand anything. Today, I've downloaded the Gimp, and it seems to be good now.

My next problem is the noise in difficult light (obelisk...), but the solution is in to buy another camera, i'm afraid.

OK, I've uploaded a corrected version of the street sign, and a new version of another close-up of the streetlamp. Thoughts about ?
Thank you very much for your help.
Have a nice sunday (...bad weather over Paris :( ...) --Jebulon (talk) 10:51, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi Jebulon, for simple perspective corrections on two-dimensional objects, Gimp is sufficient, so there is no need to use something as complicated as hugin. But if you once know how to use hugin, using Gimp might be even more cumbersome. This is because you have to tell Gimp how it should correct the image, while hugin wants to know from you only what it should optimize, not how it should do it. Also hugin can work with 16 bits per channel, and it gives better results because its methods are specially designed for photography. Did you look at this turorial and also this one? --JRff (talk) 12:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relief-Sankt-Johann-Kronberg-JR-A40-1828-2010-04-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and informative. Was she the mother of Kaiser Wilhelm II ? --Jebulon 23:51, 20 May 2010 (UTC) Yes, see here --Johannes Robalotoff 10:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Katz-JR-G6-4716-2010-06-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Jovianeye 21:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurhaus-Bad-Ems-JR-G6-4646-4648-2010-05-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 22:51, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Rheinfels-JR-E-239-241-2010-06-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 05:45, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hexenturm-Idstein-JR-G6-4546-2010-05-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Pineapple fez 05:43, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Nassau-JR-G6-4572-2010-05-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Reichenberg-JR-E-296-2010-06-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 19:00, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Reichenberg-JR-E-292-2010-06-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments white building not really sharp, perhaps a bit overexposured --Mbdortmund 19:00, 1 August 2010 (UTC)  Done Reprocessed the image from RAW file with different parameters. Issues should be solved now. Please review again. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC) OK --Mbdortmund 09:08, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Katz-JR-E-519-2010-08-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question The central tower, leaning slightly, I think it's natural. Can you confirm? --Archaeodontosaurus 15:32, 15 August 2010 (UTC) The tower is deformed in reality. (The medieval walls have weakened.) The left wall leans inside at the top, so that the tower is no longer cylindrical there. The right wall is completely upright on the image as is the house on the right. So there is no tilt or deformation in the image itself. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:47, 15 August 2010 (UTC)*  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 06:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Maus-JR-E-541-2010-08-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Contrast could be better, imho. --Berthold Werner 18:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC) Thank you for reviewing. I will try to convert with more local contrast from the RAW file tomorrow. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:15, 15 August 2010 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Please review again. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC) Ok. --Berthold Werner 15:00, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Rheinfels-JR-E-527-529-2010-08-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 17:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Nave of Granada Cathedral

Hello. Many thanks for your review of my picture. I don't absolutely know nothing about photo post processing, and you made me discover the tool "curve" in the GIMP I use. I' ve tried to follow your advice about "S" curve correction, it is really new for me. I do not understand all here, but It is very interesting ! I'm not sure if my pic is a QI now, but I think it is better. May I have your opinion now, please ? However, a lot of vielen Dank for the tip ! --Jebulon (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome. I supported the new version of your image meanwhile on the QI nomination page. --JRff (talk) 20:47, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhine-near-Sankt-Goarshausen-JR-G6-4692-2010-06-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 09:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wellmich-JR-G6-4797-2010-08-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice place, good image, though sharpness could be a bit better. --Cayambe 17:27, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Marksburg-Braubach : True or not true?

I asked the question but it was answered me it was normal.

• Confirmes-tu qu'il est aussi mal fichu que sur la photo ou y a-t-il une erreur de perspective? --Archaeodontosaurus (Diskussion) 10:23, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
• En fait, la tour est aussi mal fichue que sur ma photo. Donc, ce n'est pas d'erreur de perspective;) --Tobi 87 (d) 16:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

True or not true? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

I think that the tower is actually a bit leaning, but not as much as it appears from the image in discussion. You can see that from other pictures on the internet. On the nominated image the wall of the building right behind the tower and the flagpoles on the right are also leaning. However they do not lean on other pictures, and it is very unlikely that the flagpoles were consistently not mounted upright as they are new and not hundreds of years old. Moreover I took some pictures there by myself in this summer, although I stood closer to the hill. I did not notice this extreme Pisa tower effect. --JRff (talk) 18:24, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Understood I withdraw my vote --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Sculpture

Good evening!. If this photo overed on two degrees to left?) --Vizu (talk) 17:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Good evening. Just rotating by two degrees will not work.

I did outline the most important problem already on the QI nomination page: If you rotate, you will get the lamp and the people upright. But you have to crop the image afterwards in order to get a normal rectangular frame again. As there is not enough room at the right side this will cut the man's elbow.

The second problem is that the image is not just tilted. If you just rotate so that the lamp is upright, the basement of the sculpture will be still sloped to the right. To correct for this, one would have to make a complex perspective correction, e.g. with the free tool "hugin". And this is not worthwile because of the elbow problem described above.

I hope that I answered your question. I wish I could answer in Russian in order to make it easier for you. But I never had the opportunity to learn that language.

--JRff (talk) 18:20, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

• Thank you! --Vizu (talk) 18:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Katz HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting picture but a bit noisy, too soft and foggy/missing contrast imo. --Coastside2 18:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC) * 5,5 mb. As for me, contrast is a natural.--Vizu 18:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Support--Jebulon 23:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtmauer-Oberwesel-JR-E-797-2011-05-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ianare 23:30, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Washington D.C. Temple At Dusk.jpg

Hello, I have uploaded a corrected version of the image. (Do purge the cache of your web browser) --Jovian Eye _storm 02:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, I supported the new version on the featured image candidate page now. --JRff (talk) 18:26, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Sooneck-JR-E-852-2011-09-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments toller Blick! Die Ecke will (und muss) ich unbedingt auch mal! :-) --Carschten 20:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland!

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über mehr als 20.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 15. Oktober die Gelegenheit, Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu sichten und zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst, die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Gern kannst Du auch deine und andere Bilder in Wikipedia einbinden.

Fotos bewerten »

Bilder in die Wikipedia einbinden »

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(Martin Rulsch (WMDE) im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 9. Oktober 2017)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Schloss-Fuessen-JR-G6-6231-2018-06-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:57, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argynnis-paphia-JR-E-2295-2018-07-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GPSLeo 19:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Schloss-Fuessen-JR-G6-6224-2018-06-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check your image. There are CAs at the top and JPEG artifacts. Resolution could be better and EXIF data is missing. --XRay 05:33, 27 July 2018 (UTC)  Done CA issue fixed. As for JPEG artifacts: The image was shot in RAW and only compressed as JPEG with the final step, 95% and no chroma subsampling. Thus JPEG artifacts seem unlikely. Where do you think you see such artifacts? With respect to EXIF: Data were left out intentionally for privacy reasons. I don't see that EXIF is required for QI. At least it was so for years. I could add minimum EXIF data, but then I should now what. With respect to resolution: Can't help about that. Sensor has only 7.1 MP. Minimum resolution for QI is however 2 MP, so resolution should be sufficient IMHO. --Johannes Robalotoff 13:54, 30 July 2018 (UTC)  Comment There are still CAs. Please look at the top of the building. And yes, 2 MP is the minimum. But for easy to take photographs more can be requested. Please have a look to the guide lines. And it's not necessary to remove all EXIF data for privacy reasons. The QI rules do not require EXIF data, but it's very kind for the reviewers to have these EXIF date to give the photographer hint to resolve photographic issues. --XRay 15:53, 30 July 2018 (UTC)  Done Improved CA correction. Added essential EXIF data. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:34, 30 July 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. Thank you! --XRay 04:24, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alopochen-aegyptiaca-JR-T20-2095-2018-07-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff,

im Namen von Organisationsteam und Jury danke ich Dir für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland.

Im Jahr 2018 wurden ebenso wie im Vorjahr etwa 24.000 Fotos hochgeladen, von denen viele die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia illustrieren werden. Die Teilnehmerzahl lag diesmal bei 683, im Vorjahr waren es 1063.

Unsere Jury hat die Top100 der Bilder aus Deutschland ausgewählt. Die zehn bestplatzierten Fotos nehmen an der internationalen Ausscheidung teil.

Falls Du Lust auf einen weiteren Fotowettbewerb hast: Im September läuft Wiki Loves Monuments, wo Bilder von denkmalgeschützten Gebäuden eingereicht werden können.

Freundliche Grüße.

--Blech (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amthof-Bad-Camberg-JR-E-2757-2018-09-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:04, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amthof-Bad-Camberg-JR-G6-6310-2018-09-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:32, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus-zur-Flechte-JR-T20-2148-2018-08-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 16:19, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiherwiese-26-Idstein-JR-E-2659-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 16:19, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiherwiese-23-Idstein-JR-E-2662-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiherwiese-28-Idstein-JR-E-2660-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiherwiese-2-Idstein-JR-E-2648-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiherwiese-27-Idstein-JR-E-2663-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:12, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiherwiese-17-Idstein-JR-E-2658-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzgasse-13-Idstein-JR-E-2667-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, it's great that the sun shines on the facade --Podzemnik 15:58, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelsgasse-2-Idstein-JR-E-2725-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, even though the crop is a bit tight --Podzemnik 15:58, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

My sensor

Re this: I have found a shop some distance from me that does this; after the New Year I will be making an appointment and taking the camera there. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obergasse-7-Idstein-JR-E-2690-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:27, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rodergasse-1-3-Idstein-JR-E-2720-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 11:01, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz-4-Idstein-JR-E-2724-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:35, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaffeegasse-2a-Idstein-JR-E-2684-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Somewhat soft, but still acceptable. --Smial 23:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borngasse-5-Idstein-JR-E-2674-2677-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI --Supanut Arunoprayote 03:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenig-Adolf-Platz-Idstein-JR-E-2699-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obergasse-19-Idstein-JR-E-2680-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Reaching out to you

Hi, I just want to say that I may well be wrong, but I mean no harm, and I just call it the way I see it. I certainly don't wish to discourage you and will be looking to see whether I think any of the photos you nominate at QIC might be good FP candidates.

Happy New Year, and I'll see you on the boards.

Best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ikan,

thank you for your message. I do not mean any harm to anyone either. It is just that I was very, very surprised about your judgement. This is the reason why I wrote a longer answer to your post today on the QI discussion page. I have seen many softer images being promoted, not only macro shots, for which "crispness" is obviously much more difficult to achieve. And I have seen people prefer halos from over-sharpening over the residual, but natural softness of a lens, thus spoiling images with artifacts. That's why I felt I had to react.

The problem with noise reduction, as seen on the mobile phone image just discussed, is also not only the absolute loss of detail on fine structures. A painted wood has a consistent "grain" from brush strokes. However inappropriate noise reduction as from a mobile phone or a cheap compact camera creates an inconsistent look of details, because it smears out structures with lower contrast but preserves high-contrast structures of the same size with distinct edges . This inconsistency looks much more irritating and artificial at full resolution than moderate, but consistent lens softness, which softens everything on the same scale.

But apart from that - I don't think that my particular images currently under discussion really suffer from lens softness. As I wrote before, what disturbs you is most likely a matter of edge contrast, not sharpness. The chateau is very bright compared with the foreground. Thus highlights have to be compressed into a relatively small tone range. If I would try to compensate this with even more sharpening, this would not make the image better.

Regards and happy new year, --JRff (talk) 13:38, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. I appreciate your detailed replies and will think about them. I wonder if there would be a good talk page for more people to have a fuller discussion about these things, not focusing mainly on one or two of your photos and E3's photos but more generally. I may learn something. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Idstein-JR-E-2642-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 19:20, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Killingerhaus-Idstein-JR-T20-2101-2018-07-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:20, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiherwiese-1-Idstein-JR-E-2649-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Fischer.H 18:16, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiherwiese-13-Idstein-JR-E-2656-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:22, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amthof-Bad-Camberg-JR-E-2764-2018-09-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 20:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amthof-Bad-Camberg-JR-G6-6319-2018-09-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 20:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amthof-Bad-Camberg-JR-G6-6316-2018-09-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Cape Town pictures

How does this one look now?

Colors are more saturated and there seems to be a purple/red component on the mountains that was not there before. May be white balance is a bit different? Highlights on the houses are slightly brighter. But most important: There is uncompensated CA that was not visible at all in the old version! Detail on the mountains and plants is not better, perhaps even worse. And I see sharpening halos on the left an right side of the mountain chain. In short, it is not what I expected. What software do you use for raw conversion? --JRff (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Adobe. Daniel Case (talk) 06:30, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

For Adobe I cannot give recommendations about parameters. But you should at least try RawTherapee. It is free and open source community software, so a test will not cost you any money. The advantage of this program is that it does very little on your image per default. It does Demosaicing and then applies a tone curve similar to that which was applied by the camera to the JPEG file which is embedded in the RAW file. If your lens is in the program's database it will also correct for distortion and chromatic aberration. That's all, so far as I remember. I.e., per default there will be no noise reduction and no sharpening at all. Of course this is not acceptable for the final result. But it is a starting point where you can see what detail is actually in the raw file in absence of any processing artifacts. You can then gradually add sharpening and noise reduction as well as adjust luminance, contrast, white balance etc., and you can see step for step if this improves or rather degrades your image. It may be a bit more difficult to use than some commercial converters. But you have full control (which is not the case, e.g., for Canon's converters which I have used for some time).

Regards, --JRff (talk) 20:29, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiherwiese-15-Idstein-JR-E-2655-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments tilted --Daniel Case 20:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC) No, it is not tilted. Please measure vertical lines (like the street light, the door and the windows in the basement) with a ruler, then you will see that they are upright. It may look tilted at first sight, because the upper floor of the house is deformed in reality, since it is very old timber framing. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:59, 6 January 2019 (UTC)  Support Agree not tilted, good quality.--Scotch Mist 20:41, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz-2-4-Bad-Camberg-JR-E-2778-2018-09-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 20:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linde-Reinborn-JR-E-2495-2018-08-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Reifenberg-JR-E-2829-2019-02-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberreifenberg-Sankt-Georg-JR-E-2813-2019-02-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:36, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bassenheimer-Palais-JR-E-2818-2019-02-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Horst J. Meuter 16:34, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberreifenberg-Burg-JR-E-2832-2019-02-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 10:03, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2019

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2019 kannst Du wieder beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland (WLE 2019) teilnehmen. Gesucht sind selbst aufgenommene Landschafts- und Naturfotos aus Schutzgebieten in Deutschland.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg kann diese Übersichtsseite dienen.

WLE 2019 kann nur durchgeführt werden, wenn weitere Mitarbeiter und Mitarbeiterinnen unser Team verstärken. Es geht unter anderem um die Organisation in der Wikipedia und das Sortieren der Bilder auf Commons. Über Art und Umfang der Beteiligung entscheidest Du selbst.

Wie in den Vorjahren übernimmt eine Vorjury ab Anfang Mai die Vorauswahl der Bilder. Auch daran kannst Du Dich gern beteiligen. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Besonders engagierte Freiwillige werden für die Jury benötigt. Wenn Du vom 12. bis 14. Juli in Fulda die besten Bilder küren willst, melde Dich auf der Jury-Seite.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--GPSLeo (talk) (im Auftrag des Organisationsteams) 17:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eppstein-JR-E-3039-2019-04-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It would benefit from some extra sharpening, but ok --Poco a poco 16:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)  Done Added a bit of contrast and sharpening. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:46, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Eppstein-JR-T20-2513-2019-04-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:27, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments!

Thank you for uploading images for Wiki Loves Monuments!

However, we have noticed you have not enabled e-mail. To be eligible to win a prize the contest, you need to enable e-mail. This is what to do:

1. Check the top right of your screen, and log in if you have not done so already
2. Go to your preferences
3. Scroll down to Email Options
4. Enter your email address and click "Allow other users to email me"
5. Click Save
   

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Johannes Robalotoff,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Johannes Robalotoff,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality image

Hello. Thank you for your review in [1]. Because I don't know a lot about quality images, can you help me understand when an image can be quality image or not? Xaris333 (talk) 01:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Xaris333, the guidelines for quality images can be found at this place. What is meant with "quality" here are mostly technical aspects. This means that an image which is well recognized as a valuable contribution might not be a "quality image" in the sense of the technical QI review process. Except for simple subjects, high technical quality will often require advanced photographic equipment and good software for post-processing.

For the example of your picture File:Holy Cross monastery at Anogyra 02.jpg I wrote among other criticism: "Very unsharp on the right side". From various indicators (picture sharp in the middle, focal length, subject) one can infer that this is a limitation of your lens. From Exif data one can see that you have used a compact travel camera with ultra-zoom lens. The tininess of the equipment combined with the extreme zoom range and moderate price forces the manufacturer to accept heavy compromises with respect to optical parameters. In consequence you have to accept also the deficiency in the result.

I also wrote: "Sharpening halo around the tower". This is a pure software effect of in-camera processing. All data from photo sensors have to be sharpened by software, that's normal. But there are compact cameras which exaggerate in this point, so that the algorithm produces artifacts. In most cases these are halos around high-contrast edges. If the configuration menu of your camera allows this, you could reduce sharpening there in order to weaken the effect.

My comment "aggressive noise reduction" is another expression of "posterization", which another reviewer wrote about your other image. Every photo sensor produces signal noise which makes images "grainy". The disturbing effect has to be removed by software, either in-camera oder during post processing. However if this is done too aggressively, it kills detail from the image. As the effect is worse the smaller a sensor is, people spend lots of money and carry big and heavy equipment with themselves. Your travel zoom has a very small sensor. Thus you cannot expect too much image quality with respect to noise. If the configuration menu of your camera allows it, you could reduce noise reduction. This could extenuate posterization, but perhaps make disturbing noise visible.

Finally I wrote something about "distortions". You can see that the walls of the building are bent at the border of the image. Such "barrel" distortions are common for zoom lenses. One can correct them by post-processing with, e.g., the free software Hugin. Very modern cameras even correct the effect by in-camera software.

Hope this explanation will help you. Regards, --JRff (talk) 11:44, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runkel-JR-E-3534-2019-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I absolutely love this composition. I think this is an FP and will nominate very soon if you don't. -- Ikan Kekek 09:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischofsplatz-Limburg-JR-E-3668-2019-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Lubentius-JR-T20-4844-2019-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good composition, and I love that you got the flying bird in it. Please add a category for the bird. -- Ikan Kekek 09:59, 30 December 2019 (UTC)  Comment Thank you for review. I assume you are joking about the category of the tiny bird (common house martin) ... --Johannes Robalotoff 11:06, 30 December 2019 (UTC)  Comment No, I'm not joking. Why would it not merit a category? -- Ikan Kekek 11:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Lubentius-JR-T20-4879-4881-2019-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Another good composition. A bit of noise in the sky at full size, but I think it's OK, given the size of the photo. -- Ikan Kekek 10:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunfels-Palais-Hartleben-JR-E-3101-2019-04-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Lubentius-JR-E-3641-2019-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runkel-JR-E-3582-3584-2019-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runkel-JR-E-3600-3601-2019-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Well done --Wilfredor 19:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Lubentius-JR-T20-4858-2019-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:58, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuessen-JR-G6-6479-2019-06-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:58, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schiffwirtschaft-Fuessen-JR-G6-6506-2019-06-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:57, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunfels-Palais-Hartleben-JR-E-3103-2019-04-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 17:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzgasse-21-Limburg-JR-T20-4911-2019-08-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a more specific category --Poco a poco 13:58, 29 February 2020 (UTC)  Done Thank you for the hint. Own category for this house created, including 7 pictures from other authors now. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:53, 29 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:25, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roemer-2-6-Limburg-JR-E-3658-2019-08-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a more specific category --Poco a poco 13:58, 29 February 2020 (UTC)  Done Thank you again. Turned out that there was an own category for this house already, only somewhat hidden in the category tree. --Johannes Robalotoff 15:08, 29 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Yes, and it was yours :) QI now --Poco a poco 08:25, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2020

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2020 findet zum achten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum siebten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2019
• 
  Hessigheimer Felsengärten
• 
  Silberteich im Harz
• 
  Nationalpark Jasmund

Dieses Jahr ist es aufgrund der Ausgangsbeschränkungen schwieriger aktuelle Fotos zu machen, deshalb läuft der Wettbwerb dieses Mal zwei Monate. Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du hier und vor allem unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du möchtest am Wettbewerb teilnehmen, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die deiner Meinung nach angeschafft werden sollte, freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 31. Juli 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im August tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 08:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Teufelskrallen

Guten!

Ich habe die so wunderbar metallisch schillernde Teufelskralle in der Galerie fotografiert (eine von etwa 150, plus einem halben dutzend Solomonssiegeln, wie's im Buche steht), und gestern im Hintertaunus ein weiteres Pärchen in einem Nachbartal entdeckt. Dürfte ich aus Begeisterung erfahren, wo die neuen Exemplare zu finden sind? mailto:Peter_Dyballa(bei)Web.DE --Pete (talk) 16:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Pete, sorry für die späte Antwort, aber ich kann mich nur unregelmäßig um Wikimedia kümmern. Meine Fotos von Teufelskrallen habe ich vor fast vier Wochen gemacht. Sie waren schon zum Zeitpunkt deiner Frage alle vollständig verblüht. --JRff (talk) 21:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Ich wollte die Teufelskrallen nicht besuchen, während sie noch blühen, ich habe mit dem Schreiben über Bäche in der Wikipedia schon genug zu tun. Mich interessiert einfach, wo die anderen Teufelskrallen im weiten "Naturpark Taunus" wachsen. Meine beiden Funde liegen da auch, in Seitentälern eines Bachs. Deshalb gab ich meine eMail-Adresse an, dass der Ort hier nicht auftaucht.--Pete (talk) 07:28, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Mang-Fuessen-JR-E-4450-2020-06-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --RoxFuchs 07:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes-Spital-Fuessen-JR-E-4429-2020-06-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:49, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo Johannes_Robalotoff,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lautenmacherbrunnen-Fuessen-JR-E-4524-2020-06-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit busy composition but good quality --Podzemnik 01:43, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

My photo Kloster Ohrbeck

No problem, just try it, success! --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brotmarkt-Fuessen-JR-E-4426-2020-06-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is the fountain really oval? If not, it is not a quality image for me. -- Spurzem 08:47, 27 August 2020 (UTC)  Comment Any circle appears oval if not seen exactly from an axis perpendicular to its center point. That's just geometry. Therefore I don't know why this should be an issue for a photograph. --Johannes Robalotoff 12:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC) I know the problem. Sometimes it is unfortunately diffi­cult or even im­possib­le to make a quality picture due to the circum­stances. -- Spurzem 12:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)  Comment Circumstances? Geometrical facts do not change under circumstances. I.e. no one can photograph a circle (or even see it, without a camera) from the side without elliptic appearance. It's just physics. The only possibility to avoid this is to position a camera drone exactly above the fountain. Only then the circular base would appear as a circle. So I still wonder about the strange remark. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 00:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Johannes Robalotoff,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2021

Hallo Johannes_Robalotoff,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2020
• 
  Südliche Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna affinis) am Westufer des Gülper Sees
• 
  Bienenfresser im FFH-Gebiet Kaiserstuhl
• 
  Röhrling mit Fliege im Bruderwald in Bamberg
• 
  Strand im Nationalpark Boddenlandschaft
• 
  Neuntöter im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald

Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 11:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Denkmäler in Kronberg im Taunus

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff, vielen Dank für die Ergänzung der DenkXweb-IDs. Einen Überblick liefert de:Benutzer:M2k~dewiki/Test (permanenter Link). --M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Schloss-Fuessen-JR-E-4901-2020-06-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Schloss-Fuessen-JR-G6-6697-2020-06-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuessen-JR-E-4537-2020-06-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Mang-Fuessen-JR-E-4527-4528-2020-06-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altstadt-Fuessen-JR-G6-6651-2020-06-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teufelskralle-JR-T20-132-164-2020-05-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:32, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Petrus-und-Paulus-Kronberg-JR-E-5245-2021-05-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:33, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eichentor-Kronberg-JR-E-5225-2021-05-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanthoria-parietina-JR-T20-389-410-2020-03-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 21:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Hopfen-JR-E-5370-5372-2021-06-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Hopfen-JR-E-5358-5359-2021-06-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Schloss-Fuessen-JR-E-4872-2020-06-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:12, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vinca-minor-flower-JR-T20-0656-0690-2020-03-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vergissmeinnicht-JR-T20-7552-7581-2020-04-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goldnessel-JR-T20-8987-9047-2020-04-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teufelskralle-JR-T20-496-548-2020-05-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberreifenberg-Sankt-Georg-JR-T20-6447-2021-06-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Schloss-Fuessen-JR-G6-6679-2020-06-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add a category for trompe l'oeil (I assume there is one). -- Ikan Kekek 22:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)  Comment The category of the whole courtyard is already in the category "Trompe l'oeil in Bavaria". --Johannes Robalotoff 09:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC) OK, good. -- Ikan Kekek 19:49, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Mang-Fuessen-JR-G6-6702-2020-06-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oversharpened imo. Could the sharpening be turned down a bit? --Nefronus 17:29, 11 July 2021 (UTC)  Done Better now? --Johannes Robalotoff 21:07, 12 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Yes, good quality. --Nefronus 07:34, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitalkirche-Fuessen-JR-E-4501-2020-06-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Eisenberg-JR-E-4767-2020-06-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Eisenberg-JR-E-4617-2020-06-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Eisenberg-JR-E-4623-2020-06-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eichentor-Kronberg-JR-E-5227-2021-05-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:06, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaiser-Friedrich-Denkmal-Kronberg-JR-T20-1592-2021-10-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa-Osterrieth-Kronberg-JR-E-5221-2021-05-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrich-Ebert-Strasse-20-Kronberg-JR-E-5102-2021-05-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaiser-Friedrich-Denkmal-Kronberg-JR-T20-1586-2021-10-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The composition might be better (very large foreground), but I think it meets the QI standards. --Augustgeyler 22:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrich-Ebert-Strasse-31-33-Kronberg-JR-E-5104-2021-05-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:49, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Schloss-Fuessen-JR-G6-6681-2020-06-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 06:57, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Eisenberg-JR-E-5419-2021-06-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Am I right, the focus is sitting between foreground and background? --Augustgeyler 13:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)  Comment No. The focus is sitting on the background. Look at the wires of the power transmission lines. Even those can be clearly distinguished. And the trees on the higher alps are also sharp, though in a haze. It would be even difficult to have them unsharp at f/11. --Johannes Robalotoff 08:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC) Thank you. Now I got it. Even the wooden fence in the left foreground became sharp. I am just wondering if the composition could be improved when some parts of the unsharp foregroundwall were cropped. What do you think? --Augustgeyler 10:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC) I think, it is a matter of taste. I did not find it disturbing that the foreground is not completely sharp. Also: When viewed at 60% or less no one will probably notice it. However I see your point if I imagine the image to be printed on a big poster. Then the crop would help to make the unsharp part less dominating. On the other hand, I like the overall composition more with the wall. So it's a tradeoff. I it is a real problem for you, I could live withdrawal. Just tell me.--Johannes Robalotoff 08:07, 18 November 2021 (UTC)  Comment I see your point. I will not promote or decline your nomination and ask other reviewers to give their vote. --Augustgeyler 10:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)  Support I have considered the arguments of both of you and I can understand both sides. I like the picture and think it is good quality. --AStiasny 18:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you Johannes Robalotoff – Frissonneherissonne884 🔔 11:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you too. JRff (talk) 16:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2022 - Deutschland

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2024 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth (kurz: WLE) statt. Dabei können wie immer Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler oder andere Schutzgebiete fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2023 – Landschaft
• 
  Ramsach, ein linker Zufluss zur Loisach im oberbayerischen FFH-Gebiet Murnauer Moos
• 
  Naturdenkmal Sankt-Anna-Linde, eine ca. 300 Jahre alte Winterlinde (Tilia cordata) auf einer Anhöhe südöstlich des Heilbronner Ortsteils Kirchhausen
• 
  Buchenwald im Nationalpark Jasmund nach einem Regenschauer

• Sieger WLE 2023 – Detail
• 
  Großer Blaupfeil (Orthetrum cancellatum) im Naturschutzgebiet Gülper See
• 
  Blüte des Knöllchen-Steinbrechs (Saxifraga granulata) im Naturschutzgebiet Dattenbachtal zwischen Kröftel und Vockenhausen (Taunus)
• 
  männliche Rohrweihe (Circus aeruginosus) beim Jagdflug im Osten Spiekeroogs, Nationalpark Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt, wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zur Wettbewerbskategorie Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze in den Schutzgebieten bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Bayern die Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Landshut oder die Liste der geschützten Landschaftsbestandteile in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern mit ihren Unterlisten oder gar einzelne Artikel wie die Landschaftsschutzgebiete Sommerschafweide an Buchhalden und Sommerschafweide auf Hilbertswiese in Baden-Württemberg.

Wir vergeben in diesem Jahr drei Sonderpreise für Fotos von Feldrainen und Feldgehölzen in geschützten Gebieten.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2024 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 15. Mai bis Mitte Juli 2024 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die Anfang August tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2024 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --~~~~

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Kronberg-JR-E-5147-2021-05-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Schloss-Fuessen-JR-E-4482-2020-06-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 20:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falkenstein-Pfronten-Vilstal-JR-E-5484-2021-07-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Schloss-Fuessen-JR-E-5578-2021-07-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altstadt-Fuessen-JR-G6-6650-2020-06-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:05, 30 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --aismallard 00:46, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Schloss-Fuessen-JR-G6-6666-2020-06-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Coloman-Schwangau-JR-E-5479-2021-07-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lechbruck-Mariae-Heimsuchung-JR-E-5449-2021-06-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falkenstein-Pfronten-JR-E-5485-2021-07-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 19:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Schloss-Fuessen-JR-E-5528-2021-07-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anton-Burger-Denkmal-Kronberg-JR-E-5258-2021-05-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kornmarkt-3-Limburg-JR-T20-4933-2019-08-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger 2021 – Schloss Langenburg

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 06:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte-Lahnbruecke-Limburg-JR-E-5644-2022-04-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:37, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Johannes Robalotoff,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Einladung zu Veranstaltung

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff, ich möchte die Gewinner des WLE-Fotowettbewerbes für eine Veranstaltung diesen Sommer 2023 einladen. Es ist eine Veranstaltung zum Thema Moore mit dem Greifswald Moorzentrum. Es ist noch in einer Planungsphase und wird nun konkret und es gibt zwei mögliche Termine: die Wochenenden: 10./11.6. oder 24./25.6. Kannst Du an einem der Termine. Ich entscheiden den Termin danach an welchen Termin die meisten Zeit haben.

Ich hab die wiki-seite angelegt, da kann ich nun alles eintragen je nach Entwicklung des Projektes.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/GLAM_on_Tour_zu_Gast_beim_Greifswald_Moor_Centrum

Allerdings bin ich bis jetzt davon ausgegangen, dass es eine GLAM-veranstaltung sein kann, das hab ich für mich wohl anderes definiert als es von WMDE gesehen wird, also kann es sein, dass diese Seite noch umbenannt werden muss und in einer anderen Kategorie landet. Es ist auch noch eine früher Planungszeitpunkt und auf der Wiki-Seite stehen noch wenige Infos. Ich möchte gerne, dass 3 Fotografen dabei sind, die Freude an Objekten in der Natur und Landschaften haben. Die anderen etwa 7 Plätze sollen Wikipedia-EditorInnen belegen, die an Artikeln von Lebewesen, Ökosystemen, Klimawandel und Landwirtschaft arbeiten. Herzliche Grüße Botanist in Berlin (talk) 16:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Danke für die Einladung. Antwort ist per E-Mail erfolgt. --JRff (talk) 15:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2023 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Landschaft
• 
  Hohes Ufer zwischen Ahrenshoop und Wustrow, Fischland
• 
  Biotop Nördliche Lothdorfer Wiese
• 
  Aisch bei Willersdorf im FFH Aischgrund

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Detail
• 
  Gemeine Goldwespe im NSG Wittenberge Rühstädter Elbniederung
• 
  Libellen-Schmetterlingshaft im Naturschutzgebiet Badberg (Kaiserstuhl)
• 
  Blüte eines Schmalblättrigen Weidenröschens im Naturpark Taunus

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Sachsen die Liste der Naturdenkmale in Wurzen.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2023 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit der Upload für dich einfacher ist, haben wir in diesem Jahr die einzelnen Hochladeseiten für die Bundesländer abgeschafft, alle Fotos werden über dasselbe Formular hochgeladen. Außerdem haben wir das Layout unserer WLE-Seiten geändert.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2023 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 16:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff,

Sieger 2022 – Kloster Paulinzella

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2023 findet zum dreizehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Radomianin mit einer Gesamtansicht von Kloster Paulinzella gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Waltershausen in Thüringen oder in Fulda.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr „drei Sonderpreise für Bilder von Friedhöfen“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Friedhöfen, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map 

Upload your photos for the special price 

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Frohe Weihnachten und danke für Deine tollen Fotos!

✴ Happy Holidays, Johannes ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Aristeas (talk) 10:55, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2024 - Deutschland

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2024 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth (kurz: WLE) statt. Dabei können wie immer Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler oder andere Schutzgebiete fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2023 – Landschaft
• 
  Ramsach, ein linker Zufluss zur Loisach im oberbayerischen FFH-Gebiet Murnauer Moos
• 
  Naturdenkmal Sankt-Anna-Linde, eine ca. 300 Jahre alte Winterlinde (Tilia cordata) auf einer Anhöhe südöstlich des Heilbronner Ortsteils Kirchhausen
• 
  Buchenwald im Nationalpark Jasmund nach einem Regenschauer

• Sieger WLE 2023 – Detail
• 
  Großer Blaupfeil (Orthetrum cancellatum) im Naturschutzgebiet Gülper See
• 
  Blüte des Knöllchen-Steinbrechs (Saxifraga granulata) im Naturschutzgebiet Dattenbachtal zwischen Kröftel und Vockenhausen (Taunus)
• 
  männliche Rohrweihe (Circus aeruginosus) beim Jagdflug im Osten Spiekeroogs, Nationalpark Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt, wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zur Wettbewerbskategorie Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze in den Schutzgebieten bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Bayern die Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Landshut oder die Liste der geschützten Landschaftsbestandteile in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern mit ihren Unterlisten oder gar einzelne Artikel wie die Landschaftsschutzgebiete Sommerschafweide an Buchhalden und Sommerschafweide auf Hilbertswiese in Baden-Württemberg.

Wir vergeben in diesem Jahr drei Sonderpreise für Fotos von Feldrainen und Feldgehölzen in geschützten Gebieten.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2024 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 15. Mai bis Mitte Juli 2024 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die Anfang August tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2024 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)