User talk:Michiel1972/archive5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Hello - I'm trying to get in contact with Michiel 1972 regarding using this photo as a still in a documentary. Please contact me at kjkunberger@cloudtenpictures.com


Questions asked about your bot[edit]

Hi! Please see Commons:Bots/Requests/RobotMichiel1972, some questions have been asked. ++Lar: t/c 13:11, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are also some things you need to do. Can you please check there again? --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monte Cassino 02.jpg[edit]

File:Monte Cassino 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--sугсго 11:43, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Donald epcot.jpg[edit]

File:Donald epcot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Powers (talk) 17:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alghero 115achel.jpg[edit]

Hello Michiel1972, you wrote, that this picture has a wrong name, but where is the picture with the correct name? -- Ra'ike T C 21:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is File:Achel (north).jpg Michiel1972 (talk) 17:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Je kaartjes[edit]

Hoi Michiel1972, je kaarten zijn nuttig, maar de manier waarop je ze in een bestaande "Category" lijkt te plaatsen, komt mij niet fijn uit. Het liefste had ik dat jij ze al opdeelde per wijk/buurt en dan die overkoepelende categorie ergens binnen de gemeente plaatste met uitleg hoe je nuttige wijk/buurt-kaarten ook bij de wijk/buurt kunt plaatsen. Of ik het leuk vind, maakt nauwelijks uit, maar ik verwacht dat een subcategorie als "CBS - 201X - Gemeente" (die naam is beroerd, maar we hebben de tijd; als 't 2010 wordt, hooguit iets minder tijd) voor weinigen echt lastiger is, maar voor een redelijk aantal mensen problemen voorkomt. Erik Warmelink (talk) 18:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Portal icon.svg[edit]

Hey there, regarding Portal icon.svg, I should point out that the license you applied, public domain, is not valid, since the original source image uses a dual GFDL/CC license. I would suggest you choose a new license to meet the obligations set by the source image...that is, choose one of the licenses presented there. My suggestion would be {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}. If you have any questions, leave me a message. Cheers! — Huntster (t • @ • c) 09:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kaart Spoorlijnen in Nederland[edit]

Is het een idee om uw kaart van spoorlijnen in Nederland (bestand:Railroads Netherlands.svg) aan te passen op de volgende punten:

  • Stoomtram lijn Hoorn - Medemblik verwijderen (dit is een stoomtram lijn, geen regulier gebruikte spoorlijn)
  • Museumstoomtrein lijn van de ZLSM verwijderen (in Zuid-Limburg alleen de Heuvellandlijn en de lijn Maastricht - Visé laten staan in de kaart)
  • Klein stukje spoorlijn toevoegen bij Almelo zodat de lijn naar Mariënberg echt vast zit aan de lijn bij Almelo
  • Spoolijn Weert - Nederlandse grens te verwijderen. Dit stuk wordt alleen door goederentreinen gebruikt. Alle andere spoorlijnen voor alleen goederentreinen staan er ook niet op (zoals in de Amsterdamse havens, in Zeeuws-Vlaanderen, bij Moerdijk, bij Pon enz...
  • De HSL toevoegen
  • In stippellijnen de Hanzelijn (Lelystad - Zwolle) en Zuidbroek - Veendam toevoegen
    • Hanzelijn komt eind 2012 in bedrijf, Zuidbroek - Veendam medio 2010
  • De grensoverschrijdende spoorlijnen laten ophouden bij de Nederlandse grens

Als u het hiermee eens bent, zou u deze wijzigingen willen doorvoeren in een nieuwe versie van uw bestand? Schalkcity (talk) 15:13, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lijken me prima wijzigingen; je kan ze ook zelf doorvoeren als je wil. Ik heb er even geen tijd/zin in. Michiel1972 (talk) 21:11, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hellendoorn - Galgeman[edit]

Je koos de naam File:Map - NL - Hellendoorn - Wijk 02 Nijverdal Noord - Buurt 03 Galgeman-industrieterrein-Noord.svg. Misschien is de schrijffout onopzettelijk, misschien maakte jij haar, misschien het CBS. In ieder geval geeft http://www.google.nl/search?q=Galgeman+Hellendoorn alleen wiki[mp]edia(-klonen), terwijl http://www.google.nl/search?q=Gagelman+Hellendoorn een wat ruimere selectie geeft (zie ook Gagelfamilie). Erik Warmelink (talk) 19:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blijkbaar een van de spelfouten die in het bestand van het CBS zit of zat. Omdat de totale upload meer dan 10.000 bestanden betrof, en geautomatiseerd geupload op basis van de gegeven naam, zijn ze niet stuk voor stuk gecontroleerd. Michiel1972 (talk) 21:10, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, het zou een spelfout kunnen zijn, maar dan zou ik verwachten dat die spelfout ook buiten wikipedia te vinden zou zijn. Je laadde het plaatje op nadat ik http://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=10532295 had geschreven. Laat ik het zo zeggen: als mijn vader iets overkomt, ben jij een van de hoofdverdachten (en dan blijkt dat het opladen van File:Sphynx kitten.JPG onder je eigen naam misschien geen goed idee was en dat je daarvoor beter een andere schuilnaam zoals nl:212.123.186.115, nl:85.214.45.170, nl:Gebruiker:Paris8798217227, nl:Waarheid van Roubaix, nl:Montreal groet Andre, nl:B4 France, nl:Berlin057, nl:gebruiker:Likmijn poepje, nl:Doorgedraaide trollenhater, nl:Tim Auke haat trollen, nl:Jan Kees Munich, nl:Jaco Gijs, abusing the name of a celebrity, nl:81.169.130.185, nl:91.121.13.62, nl:91.121.10.81, nl:85.191.37.158 of nl:DingDong had kunnen gebruiken). Erik Warmelink (talk) 21:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Je leest je pagina blijkbaar, als je je wilt verschuilen achter een fout van het CBS, kun je hun versie-nummer noemen. Erik Warmelink (talk) 20:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Michiel1972! As far as I can see Erik is right that the name is not spelled correct. Maybe you could take a look at nl:Overleg:Wijken en buurten in Hellendoorn? If you agree maybe you can correct the file? I can do the rename. --MGA73 (talk) 12:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problems with any renaming, you can do that without my notice (I uploaded more than 16.000 maps automatically using the CBS naming convention, which can include their errors;). Michiel1972 (talk) 20:57, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Standaard licentie[edit]

Hoi Michiel1972, je hebt nu als licentie {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-2.5}}. Zou je hiervan {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0}} willen maken? Multichill (talk) 14:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm ja, zat zeker in commonist. Michiel1972 (talk) 18:39, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, dan moet je license.txt aanpassen. Kan ik cc-by-sa-3.0 aan je recente uploads toevoegen? Multichill (talk) 23:58, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Geen enkel probleem mee. Michiel1972 (talk) 17:53, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:OVstudentkaart1991.jpg[edit]

Hallo Michiel - Deze afbeelding geeft wel veel persoonlijke informatie - weet je zeker dat je niet bv je geboortedatum/achternaam ook eraf wilt vegen? -- Deadstar (msg) 09:20, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wijk Duinoord in Den Haag[edit]

Hallo Michiel1972. In de Category:Maps of The Hague heb je de plattegronden van alle Haagse wijken geupload, ingedeeld in 8 stadsdelen. Maar als ik alle stadsdelen samenvoeg, blijkt er een gaatje over te blijven: de wijk Duinoord is niet in een stadsdeel opgenomen. Kun je er svp eens naar kijken? Dank! Wikifrits (talk) 20:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File tagging File:Cdb.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cdb.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cdb.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 08:14, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

copyvios by Cumulus[edit]

Hi Michiel1972,
could you complete your speedy-tags on File:Torenberg Zaamslag.JPG, File:Vliedberg 't Hof Hazenburg.JPG, File:Vliedberg st Jan ter Heere.JPG and File:Vliedberg Elkerzee.JPG. --Túrelio (talk) 09:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the sources and added 16 other pictures that violate copyright. However, Vliedberg Elkerzee is - as far as I know - not a copyright violation. It is not published in the source of the other files: Pictures by Ton Penders on CD-ROM that is part of R.M. van Heeringen, Monumenten van aarde, ISBN 9789077525135. Copyright held by Rijksdienst voor Archeologie, Cultuurlandschap en Monumentenzorg. Gasthuis (talk) 21:45, 29 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Thanks. I've notified the original uploader: [1]. --Túrelio (talk) 21:21, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I had already notified him on his Dutch talk page. He informed me on my talk page he didn't know how to nominate these files for deletion on Commons. He admitted tacitly that he was not the author of the pictures and had indeed violated the copyright. Gasthuis (talk) 21:32, 30 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]
I've finally deleted: File:Vliedberg st Jan ter Heere.JPG, File:Vliedberg 't Hof Hazenburg.JPG, File:Torenberg Zaamslag.JPG, File:Vliedberg Sinoutskerke.JPG, File:Vliedberg Berglust.JPG, File:Vliedberg Pauwenburg.JPG, File:Vliedberg Bosweg.JPG, File:Vliedberg Bieweg.JPG, File:Vliedberg Veerseweg.JPG, File:Vliedberg Schellachseweg.JPG, File:Vliedberg Kleverskerke.JPG, File:Vliedberg Groeneweg.JPG, File:Vliedberg Perduinsweg.JPG, File:Vliedberg Klein Mariekerke.JPG, File:Vliedberg Koudekerke Meinersweg.JPG, File:Vliedberg Krommenhoeke.JPG, File:Vliedberg Biggekerke Schuitvlotstraat.JPG, File:Vliedberg Biggekerke Zoutelandseweg.JPG and File:Vliedberg Biggekerke Bergweg.JPG. --Túrelio (talk) 21:37, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your very speedy action. Gasthuis (talk) 21:43, 30 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Quartieri di Roma[edit]

Salve Michiel! Saresti in grado di realizzare le mappe dei quartieri di Roma, simili a quelle che hai fatto sui rioni? --Markos90 (talk) 22:51, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Ashfield lga sydney.png[edit]

File:Ashfield lga sydney.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--GaAs11671 18:25, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Locator maps in drie duitse "Landkreise"[edit]

Hoi Michiel1972,
ich ben al lang bezig met het creeren van plattegronden in een bepaalde type (Typ 1) voor duitse gemeenten en steden. Er mist maar een Landkreis (Landkreis Regensburg) en je kan hier zien, dat het merendeel van plattegronden is nu beschikbaar in die type, die ik (en ook andere) heb gefabriceerd. Dit geldt onder andere ok voor de Landkreise Landkreis Dachau, Landkreis Freising en Landkreis Landshut. Je hebt in 2006 plattegronden van Eppandas van de-wiki naar commons overdragen. Sinds Eppandas is inactief sinds october 2006 en er daarom geen zin in is, hem te vragen, wil ik nu graag jij vragen, of er iets tegenaan staat, deze plattegronden tegen m'n interuilen? Trouwens sorry voor mijn stuntelige Nederlands. --Hagar66 (talk) 13:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi, ik heb geen probleem ermee de oude kaartjes in te ruilen voor de nieuwe kaarten. Succes. Michiel1972 (talk) 15:23, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Heel bedankt! :-) --Hagar66 (talk) 18:57, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kaart van de nieuwe indeling in zeven stadsdelen van Amsterdam[edit]

Beste Michiel 1972,
Is het mogelijk om op basis van deze kaart: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/Map_-_NL_-_Amsterdam_-_Stadsdeel_Westerpoort.svg een nieuwe kaart (nieuwe kaarten) te maken met de nieuwe indeling in zeven stadsdelen van Amsterdam zoals deze geldt sinds 1 mei 2010. Op dit moment is er nog niet zo'n kaart beschikbaar op wikimedia. Bij voorbaat dank voor de moeite.
Groeten, Erik Swierstra, Eriksw (talk) 16:37, 20 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Mogelijke copyvio[edit]

Beste Michiel. Ik zag dat je een vraag hebt gesteld, hier: [2]. Enig geduld en wachten op antwoord lijkt me gepast, maar op een gegeven ogenblik moet er toch een antwoord komen op de vraag op de hulppagina: [3]. Of anders de plaatjes verwijderen van het artikel en uit commons. Die procedure is nog altijd wat te complex voor mij en ben blij te zien dat er iemand is, jij dus, die zich wel als een "vis in het water" voelt op commons. Daarvoor dank dus. --VanBuren (talk) 10:19, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kaart van Stadsdeel Centrum in Amsterdam[edit]

Beste Michiel 1972,
Mooi dat er van de nieuwe stadsdelen in Amsterdam nu ook goede kaartjes zijn. Het stadsdeel Centrum is niet gewijzigd, maar op het bestaande kaartje staat Stadsdeel Binnenstad. Het heeft echter altijd Stadsdeel Centrum geheten en niet Stadsdeel Binnenstaad. Misschien is het mogelijk om dit ook aan te passen, dan zijn alle namen correct. Bij voorbaat dank voor de moeite.
Groeten, Erik Swierstra, Eriksw (talk) 13:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photo permission[edit]

Michiel, the City of Phoenix, Arizona is preparing a publication on Modern architecture. We would like to use your photo of Unite d'Habitation Marseille in the publication. It will be a non-commercial use, so I believe we are OK under the terms of the license, but will you please contact us to verify? Our e-mail address is historic@phoenix.gov. Thanks - Kevin Weight, Senior Planner, City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Office. Ksweight (talk) 00:25, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:IMG 01142.JPG, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Do you still need this photo for anything? --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

no, you can delete it. Michiel1972 (talk) 20:26, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Strippenkaart resized.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Strippenkaart resized.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Zie Commons:Deletion requests/File:Strippenkaart 2.jpeg. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ronald_McDonald_sitting.jpg[edit]

File:Ronald_McDonald_sitting.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

guerreritoboy (talk) 21:38, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bambi_epcot.jpg[edit]

File:Bambi_epcot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Powers (talk) 16:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Je ging wat hard[edit]

Wellicht handig om een vlaggetje voor RobotMichiel1972 aan te vragen. Ik zie dat er al iemand achter je rug om aan het klagen is. Multichill (talk) 13:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:RobotMichiel1972[edit]

Could you please ask permission to upload images with bot? You uploaded many files and I think will be good idea to ask bot status. Uploads looks fine for me, but it'll be good idea to aks other people opinion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I need to upload another 6000 then I am done (for this project). So about 2 hours of upload. If you want, I can do the uploads after say 00:00 if it annoys your lists. Michiel1972 (talk) 19:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Even door het hoepeltje springen en dan kan je weer verder zonder dat iemand er last van heeft. Multichill (talk) 19:37, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gr.. Ik kan zelf ook niet meer editten op andere pagina's behalve hier. En in die botaanvraag (dank voor het heropenen) heb ik overigens weinig vertrouwen, geen idee wat ze de vorige keer niet beviel. Misschien dat jij het restant (als bot) wil uploaden voor mij? de laatste circa 6000. De totale omvang in kb is minder 10 highresoluties foto's, het zijn er alleen zoveel. Michiel1972 (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Doh! DieBuche had autoblock van het ip gedaan. Je kan nu weer editen. Multichill (talk) 20:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Detailkaart Scandinavië[edit]

Hallo Michiel, zo te zien ben jij de maker van kaartjes als deze. Ben jij in staat om zoiets ook voor Finland te maken? Ik vind de kaart op nl:Nationaal park Kolovesi onnodig dominant: kaartjes zoals die voor Zweden bestaan zouden een uitkomst zijn. Het is denk ik genoeg als het land in tweeën kan. Wat zijn de kansen? Groeten, Fransvannes (talk) 10:08, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Population - Municipality code 01030.svg[edit]

There is of course room for improvement, I e.g. added the year two times to give some example. Such simple graphs can easily go to Wikipedia e.g. by using a template, with a template - and even without - such graphs are easy to edit by anyone, contrary to an svg file. They are easy to update by bot if there is a new data point in e.g. 2017 and using a template you can quickly change format and/or layout if requested. --Martin H. (talk) 22:54, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I used them a lot, but not anymore because. 1) they are ugly, and 'out of date' (not maintained/improved). 2) Values shown in timelines can not be included in templates. 3) Users editing articles are confronted with this complicated code. Michiel1972 (talk) 11:52, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Didnt know about 2), it was my impression that it is possible and not very difficult. Actually 3) was my main intention, contrary to an svg file people can edit this, they can make it look different, change its size, scale, etc. Thats something most people cant do because they dont know how to work with SVGs, therefore I see such "wikitext-convertible" SVGs more as an evasional file format. But if you already considered to use timeline youre maybe right with your reasoning, just wanted to give you the hint in case you not know it. --Martin H. (talk) 20:34, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map_-_NL_-_Groningen_-_Wijk_09_Noorddijk_-_Buurt_03_Lewenborg-West.svg[edit]

File:Map_-_NL_-_Groningen_-_Wijk_09_Noorddijk_-_Buurt_03_Lewenborg-West.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

82.73.151.3 07:52, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paleis_lange_voorhout.jpg[edit]

File:Paleis_lange_voorhout.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Saibo (Δ) 19:48, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unité_d'Habitation_Marseille.jpg[edit]

File:Unité_d'Habitation_Marseille.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.132.230 17:43, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unité_d'Habitation_Marseille_3.jpg[edit]

File:Unité_d'Habitation_Marseille_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.132.230 21:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unité_d'Habitation_Marseille_2.jpg[edit]

File:Unité_d'Habitation_Marseille_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.132.230 18:57, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on mailing list WLM[edit]

Hoi Michiel, vandaag had ik mails ontvangen op de WLM maillijst over werk die jij verricht voro Wallonia, dus misschien is het handig als je je daarop abonneert? Hier is de info over de lijst: Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu Kom je naar Den Bosch a.s. zaterdag? groet, Jane023 (talk) 13:12, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LocationHarbin.PNG[edit]

Sorry, but could you remake this map? The location of Harbin there is utterly wrong, too far to the east. For simplicity, move the dot and label further upstream that river, and align it with Seoul's longitude. Thanks much —HXL's Roundtable and Record 18:04, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buenos Aires outline map.svg[edit]

Greetings,

Since you are the creator of the above picture/map, I was wondering if you can reduce the scope of the map since there is a lot of excess territory that hampers its usage with multiple pins, like here. Figured it would be more in scope/scale to this picture. Thanks in advance. Digirami (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unité_d'Habitation_Marseille_3.jpg[edit]

File:Unité_d'Habitation_Marseille_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 05:51, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unité_d'Habitation_Marseille.jpg[edit]

File:Unité_d'Habitation_Marseille.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 06:07, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments![edit]

WLM super uploader
Thanks for uploading already more than 100 photos to Wiki Loves Monuments! Keep going, like this mill at Kinderdijk :) -- {{{signature}}}

Blank maps of Swedish Counties[edit]

Hi Michiel1972. I saw that you are the author of most if not all locator maps of Swedish counties depicting municipalities. This is a remarkable work, which I am happy to see (and use :-)). The reason I am trying to contact you is that probably it would be easy for you to generate blank maps for the rest of the counties, which maps are missing. Being an editor of bg.wikipedia, which language is not Latin-based, I find blank maps of Swedish counties the most useful as could be seen here. The problem is that several counties does not have blank maps. From what I was able to check, Värmland, Uppsala, Södermanland, Västernorrland, Örebro, Östergötland, Västmanland and Skåne are missing such maps. Since for all of them the municipality locator maps are available, I assume that blank maps could be easily generated. I would like kindly to ask you if you can spare some time to generate those and upload them in commons. I will be more than happy, and I am sure most of other non-latin users too. Kind regards, BloodIce (talk) 21:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please give images better names[edit]

العربية ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ magyar ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded File:Map canton code 24 31.svg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error. Please give uploaded files meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the file is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename your image with an intuitive name that describes the file itself. Thanks, and happy editing!

→AzaToth 20:53, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These simple names are useful to include in an template only referencing a area code. I will try to update the description page soon with full names. Michiel1972 (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot has been blocked :-([edit]

Dear Michiel1972,
I am sorry to inform you that after a consultation with other Commons users I had to block the bot you've been running because it has been flooding RecentChanges and NewFiles special pages for quite a long time already today. I've been reading the request page for the bot's approval and I know that you've been waiting since April, but unfortunately, the upload frequency today was definitely too high.

Please either 1) try to reach EugeneZelenko or Cecil to get the bot approved at last or 2) set the upload frequency for a smaller number of images per hour, e.g. 1 file every 1 minute or 2 minutes. If you decide to take the latter solution, I will happily unblock the bot as soon as possible. I am looking forward to hearing from you & am sorry I had to take such a dramatic step. Best regards, odder (talk) 23:18, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Michiel1972,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wateringen - Heulweg Molen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:38, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--Vera (talk) 12:16, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Attend the award ceremony of the Dutch Wiki Loves Monuments 2011[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 English | Nederlands | +/−
Dear Michiel1972,

We've already thanked you for your contribution to the Wiki Loves monuments photo contest. But with a contest, there are prizes to win!

The award ceremony will be held in Utrecht on Saturday the 5th of November, at the end of the Dutch Wikimedia Conference at Media Plaza, held the same day. Media Plaza is located next to the Central Station in Utrecht, in the middle of the shopping mall.
Admittance is free from 3pm onwards, just in time to catch the last few presentations at the WCN. Off course you can join us for the full day conference as well and enjoy a day full of information on wiki's and cultural heritage. After the ceremony, our location sponsor generously offers a free drink to everyone!

Remember: in order to make a chance to win, you need a confirmed e-mail address added to your Commons settings.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team and the Dutch Wikimedia Conference team
 WCN 2011
Sent by Lucia Bottalk in 23:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:14, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Android app[edit]

Hi Michiel,

Congrats on winning the coding challenge with your Android upload app. I just tried it out and hey presto, it works. Nice job :)

I don't know if you have looked at Flickroid but that is a nice upload to Flickr app which might be worth emulating in some respects. It mainly just exists in the Share menu but if you open it directly it shows you a list of the things you've uploaded with it. It also allows uploading of multiple files at once.

I'm sure you've already thought of this but it would be nice to

  • have the licenses as a drop down list
  • have support for adding categories
  • have notifications that contain links/URL of the uploaded file

cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:46, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Img by michiel1972 14.jpg, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Vera (talk) 12:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Img by michiel1972 17.jpg, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Vera (talk) 12:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Img by michiel1972 18.jpg, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Vera (talk) 12:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Img by michiel1972 19.jpg, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Vera (talk) 12:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:EnglandSheffield.png[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:EnglandSheffield.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 23:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stop User:RobotMichiel1972[edit]

Hello!

You do not have a positive permission for running User:RobotMichiel1972. Stop it, please. Only 30-50 edits/uploads in a test run. --High Contrast (talk) 22:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I have just deactivated your bot. After this came to a positve end, an admin will reactivate your bot. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 23:01, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I wait for that bit already a year or so. No problem to wait some extra days. But even if it is not coming to a decision -which I expect- I would like my bot to be unblocked to finish my project. This is just a bureaucracy thing. Michiel1972 (talk) 23:17, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I unblocked your bot, see here. I hope someone can give your bot the appropriate rights soon. Trijnsteltalk 15:35, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Michiel1972/archive5&oldid=304149251"