User talk:Meister
Hi, Image:Laguna Conococha.jpg is a very nice picture, but we need a clearer license statement, which is why we recommend GFDL, CC-by, etc. For instance, does "using" include commercial use, which is one of the things our free licenses allow. Stan Shebs 15:17, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I have connected to the German photographer (OdSHansPeterThomas@t-online.de) who has given free license as long as the author's weblink is mentioned, including commercial use. Meister 15:54, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Bolivian Provinces[edit]
Hi Meister, I noticed you uploaded some files of Bolivian Provinces. I uploaded similar images here in the catagory of Bolivian Provinces Chau - Daan 22:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Daan, I noticed that you were linking the Bolivian Potosí province pages (German versions) to those of the Dutch versions (... at least I guess it was you). And I noticed that there are some maps of the provinces as well. What's different with my Potosí maps is that they not only have province boundaries but municipio boundaries as well. I want to add municipio maps to the municipio pages, that's why I want to continue with my maps .. unless you have maps with municipio boundaries at hand which would save me some extra time. -- Meister 17:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Meister, I do have this file, an Illustrator file, with the lines of municipalities as well, which I can share for sure. Though I thought it would be best to only show the provinces in articles related to provinces and maybe make a more detailed map with the municipalities in articles about these municipalities. What do you think? - Daan 19:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
OTRS[edit]
Hello,
I have received permission for the images mailed to you by Silvia Vallejos, but I don't know which images that are. Please add the following code to the image description page(s). {{PermissionOTRS|ticket=https://secure.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=2064520}}
Cheers,
Kameraad Pjotr 19:08, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token 271fe6e0c9f1df2f518de0d9d5e66aa7[edit]
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 20:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Serranía de Huayllamarca.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Osthaus- und Schumacher-Museum.jpg was uncategorized on 21 September 2009.
File tagging File:Iskanwaya_2.jpg[edit]
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Iskanwaya_2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Iskanwaya_2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kam Solusar (talk) 17:01, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Iskanwaya_1.jpg[edit]
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Iskanwaya_1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Iskanwaya_1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kam Solusar (talk) 17:01, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 |
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Nico Hoffmann.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 20:45, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 |
File:Cerro Silala.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 04:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Löschungen[edit]
Well, for all the photos which have now been deleted there existed mail confirmations by the authors, which I mailed to Commons, but that was all I could do. If Commons decides these confirmations are worthless, I can't help it. -- Meister (talk) 14:47, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
|
File:Villamontes - Bolivia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:57, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
In that image, it seems that the areas filled with vertical blue lines and with yellow actually have absolutely no meaning, since they're defined by the intersections of two curves which graph completely unrelated quantities. AnonMoos (talk) 11:44, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- No, they DO have meaning. "Climate charts in the Walter and Lieth format" are constructed in such a way that the climate period is defined as "arid" when the blue line is below the red line (= percipitation < evaporation), and "humid" when the blue line is above the red line (= percipitation > evaporation). Which gives me the idea to include the information "arid" and "humid" in those climate charts which I have already constructed and in those which are still to come. -- Meister (talk) 12:31, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- OK, but the meaning is by no means obvious from the chart itself... AnonMoos (talk) 15:31, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- You are absolutely right, - I myself have been too much used to working with this kind of climate chart that to me it was absolutely obvious. I've added additional information to the Urmiri chart and will do so with all the others as well. Thanks again for the hint. -- Meister (talk) 19:22, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Climate data from Uyuni[edit]
Hey Meister,
I was looking for climate data for Uyuni in Bolivia and found your climate diagram. Since I prefer to work with original data I followed the references you gave (www.geo-reisecommunity.de) but I could not find the climate data you used for the graph. The only data I could find were weather forecasts and stuff. Could you send me an up to date link to the data?
Thanks for your help, Anna
- Hi Anna, the complete reference address is <www.geo-reisecommunity.de/klimadaten> where a map opens on the right hand side. You have to move the map to South America / Bolivia and try to find Uyuni in that map by enlargening the map excerpts. Then zoom into the map and click on Uyuni town center, and the climate details will show on the left. If it still doesn't work out, or you need some translation, contact me again -- Meister (talk) 16:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
This file has been uploaded by me today, and the following permission has been sent by me to permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org:
- File:René Röspel 02.jpg
- -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
- Von: Roespel Rene Wahlkreis <rene.roespel@wk.bundestag.de>
- An: Klaus Ehlers <meisterehlers@aol.com>
- Verschickt: Mi, 15 Feb 2012 11:16 am
- Betreff: Erlaubnis des Urhebers
- Ich gestatte hiermit die Verwendung des Fotos "René Röspel 02" in Wikipedia
- Commons unter der Lizenz "Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal - alle Rechte
- werden freigegeben".
- Quelle: Wahlkreisbüro René Röspel, Hagen
- Autor: Dr. Falko Brede
- René Röspel
- Dr. Falko Brede
- Wahlkreisbüro René Röspel MdB
- wiss. Mitarbeiter: Jochen Milde
- Elberfelder Str. 57, 58095 Hagen
- Tel.: (02331) 919458, Fax: 925437
This file has been uploaded by me today, and today the following permission has been sent by the photographer to permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org:
"I hereby affirm that I, Stuart Morle, am the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Victor_Von_Hagen_002.JPG .
I agree to publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0" (unported) and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Stuart Morle, 72, James' Walk, Rialto. Dublin 8. Republic of Ireland 09/05/2012"
Copyright status: File:San Javier (Beni).jpg[edit]
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:San Javier (Beni).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:04, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Meister,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Butzbach-Hausen.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Butzbach-Hausen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Butzbach-Hausen.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Butzbach-Hausen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Meister (talk) 19:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
|
File:Chiñimayu.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Milly Steger Fotobenutzung[edit]
Lieber Herr Meister
ich würde liebend gerne Ihr Foto des Stadttheaters Hagen für eine wissenschaftliche Publikation zu Milly Steger verwenden. Leider ist das Wikimedia-foto mit 72 dpi zu klein. Hätten Sie zufällig eine TIFF-Datei, minimum 300 dpi, parat? Wenn ja, so würde ich mich sehr freuen, wenn ich sie benutzen dürfte. Meine Mail ist nina.lubbren@anglia.ac.uk
Mit freundlichen Grüssen Dr. Nina Lübbren Anglia Ruskin University East Road Cambridge CB1 1PT England — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.157.243.81 (talk) 15:38, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth 2020[edit]
Hallo Meister,
bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2020 findet zum achten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum siebten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!
- Sieger WLE 2019
-
Hessigheimer Felsengärten -
Silberteich im Harz -
Nationalpark Jasmund
Dieses Jahr ist es aufgrund der Ausgangsbeschränkungen schwieriger aktuelle Fotos zu machen, deshalb läuft der Wettbwerb dieses Mal zwei Monate. Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du hier und vor allem unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.
Du möchtest am Wettbewerb teilnehmen, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die deiner Meinung nach angeschafft werden sollte, freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.
Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 31. Juli 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im August tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.
Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 08:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth 2022 - Deutschland[edit]
Hallo Meister,
bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2022 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist bereits zum neunten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!
- Sieger WLE 2021 – Landschaft
-
Halde Jägersfreude -
Naturschutzgebiet Wacholderhänge bei Wallersberg -
Landschaftsschutzgebiet Heseler Wald und Umgebung
- Sieger WLE 2021 – Detail
-
Schneebedeckte Pappel-Schüpplinge im FFH-Gebiet Regnitz, Stocksee und Sandgebiete von Neuses bis Hallstadt -
Blüten des Gamander-Ehrenpreis im Naturpark Taunus -
Striegeliger Schichtpilz im Bruderwald in Bamberg
-20201204-RM-154343.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Seit dem vergangenen Jahr ist der Wettbewerb zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Bereichen Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. Im Bereich Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.
Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen - zum Beispiel in Bayern Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Würzburg oder in Sachsen Liste der Naturdenkmale in Stollberg/Erzgeb.
Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2022 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.
In diesem Jahr feiert die FFH-Richtlinie ihren 30. Geburtstag. Aus diesem Grund vergeben wir fünf Sonderpreise für die Fotografen, die die meisten FFH-Gebiete fotografieren.
Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.
Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 12:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
.jpg){kind=link}
And also:
Yours sincerely, — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Fluss-Profil Río Turuchipa.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Fluss-Profil Río Turuchipa.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fluss-Profil Río Turuchipa.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
