User talk:Mattes/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archives: Part 1 · Part 2

Babel user information
de-N Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.
en-3 This user has advanced knowledge of English.
es-1 Esta persona tiene un conocimiento básico del español.
fr-1 Cet utilisateur dispose de connaissances de base en français.
Users by language

Check-in (Airports)

Hi, I don't think that "Check-in (Airports)" is a good name for a category. Maybe something like "Airport check-in counters" would be better. What do you think about it? Dantadd✉ 13:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

The pattern is to use full terms (more natural expressions), such as "Sociologists of Germany" and not "Sociologists (Germany)". 13:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
The pattern at w:German Wikipedia is usually "... (specifiacation)" Mattes 14:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
In English it doesn't seem natural to me. Dantadd✉ 14:36, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:AOT counter Temporary airport permit.JPG

Image deletion warning Image:AOT counter Temporary airport permit.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
-- Editor at Large • talk 16:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:ASG-Bedienungselement.jpg

Hi, a note to add that Image:ASG-Bedienungselement.jpg has been requested for deletion as well. I tried to fix these two up but they really can't be saved, unfortunately; some of your others I have been able to touch up a tad, though.  :) -- Editor at Large • talk 09:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your efforts! Regarding this pic: I will do a new and better one. BFN, -- Mattes 13:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedydeletes

Hi Mattes. These two pages (User:Mattes/Gallery of data contributed/Part 2: Maps, Views & Logos. and User:Mattes/Gallery of data contributed/Part 3/ The Figures of History) in your userspace are tagged for speedydeletion. Do you want them deleted? FrancoGG ( talk ) 19:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, because another user (not Schimmelreiter) has created these pages without asking me before. I hope all pics are included in another gallery page of me. Mattes 21:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:SegwayHT.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:SegwayHT.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Oxam Hartog 22:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Leave categories at the bottom please

Hello, please do not move categories on image description pages at the top, please leave them at the bottom of each page. This is the recommended placing, not only for bots. Thanks --Überraschungsbilder 03:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Blurry/dark images

Hello again! I noticed a bunch more of your images were added to CAT:IFC because they are blurry or dark. Blurriness is a problem with the camera focusing, and is not something that can be fixed digitally: the only way to make a blurry picture better is to retake it. While minor tweaks can be made to sharpen slightly all it does is make the contrast between the pixels higher while the actual image remains blurred. Severely blurred images can't be fixed at all.

The same goes for severely dark images; while the lightness can be boosted they end up washed out, and if contrast is boosted as well in an attempt to keep the colour they end up being worse than the original. Some are just not salvageable because the data is not there, and no matter how much they're edited they can't be fixed up to encyclopedic quality. Or in some cases there are other pictures to better illustrate the subject.

As for what to do with unsalvageable ones, there are a few options. I can ...

  1. nominate for deletion through normal COM:DEL process, which takes a while and requires people to vote and come to a concensus;
  2. leave you a message here and you can add the speedy delete tag;
    2a. you can state here or on my talk page that I can nominate pictures that are not fixable for speedy deletion and I cite that when adding the speedy tag;
  3. I can delete myself if they can't be fixed, of course ensuring that only the hopeless images are deleted.

I am all for keeping images which are the only examples of their subjects, or images that are a bit dark or a bit blurry but still useable; but there are the odd unuseable ones that really can't be of any use. I always try to fix an image before considering it hopeless, so no useable images will be deleted. Whatever method you choose I'll go along with :) All the best, -- Editor at Large • talk 13:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi Editor at Large! I agree that images of real bad quality should be deleted, but regarding images of a slightly bad quality theses images should be kept until a new pic exchanges it (commons is not stating that only professional and perfect images are saved up). Pictures which small mistakes are better than none... Some pictures from far away can't be replaced easily and some moments never.
OK, I will not place the ifc tag for blurry pictures anymore. I thought, theses errors could be repaired... Well, thanks again for your efforts. Sincerely, Mattes 16:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Armenian empire.gif

Image deletion warning Image:Armenian empire.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Cat chi? 15:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:ETAH-Das Grausen.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:ETAH-Das Grausen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
--—xyzzyn 03:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Thw.schild.JPG

Pay attention to copyright Image:Thw.schild.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

G.dallorto 14:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
revoked [1], Mattes 15:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Thw.logo.JPG

Pay attention to copyright Image:Thw.logo.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

G.dallorto 14:41, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
now PD-GermanGov Mattes 15:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:THW.png

Pay attention to copyright Image:THW.png has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

G.dallorto 14:41, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Not uploaded by me. Now PD-GermanGov Mattes 15:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Thw.kfz-zulassungplakette.2.JPG

Pay attention to copyright Image:Thw.kfz-zulassungplakette.2.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

G.dallorto 14:41, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Now PD-GermanGov Mattes 15:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Thwob.png

Pay attention to copyright Image:Thwob.png has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

G.dallorto 14:41, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Not uploaded by me. Now PD-GermanGov Mattes 15:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:McGraw-Graben.JPG

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:McGraw-Graben.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. cohesion 21:22, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

{ was missing. Big deal?! Mattes 12:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Image-Wemo-Zweiwegefahrzeug DC2631-Heck.JPG

Hallo Mattes,

habe ich das richtig verstanden, dass nur die linke Licher bleiben sollen? Da ich von solchen Nutzfahrzeugen absolut keine Ahnung habe weiss ich nicht was wichtig ist!

Grüße, --Ogre 19:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Ja die für den Straßenverkehr und die für den Schienenverkehr auf der linken Seite (leider habe ich das Objekt rechts abgeschnitten, als Paar wär's schöner)... Danke übrigens für Deinen unermüdlichen Einsatz! -- Mattes 19:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:BStMI-Gebäude crop.jpg

I have uploaded a crop of Image:BStMI-Gebäude.JPG as Image:BStMI-Gebäude crop.jpg because it was in the Category:Images_for_cleanup. Tell me if the edit is what you wanted. --Digon 01:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Nice work. Your version ist just right. Thanx! Mattes 11:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

About substing {{Mattes}}

Unmögliche Figur
Unmögliche Figur

Please see Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2007Jan#Personal_license_templates for the opinion on personalised templates. /Lokal_Profil 17:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Well I don't see a problem with my template. The licence is readable by bots because it generates pd-self|Mattes as a category. Wikisource reads pd-self out of the template as well. Please wait before exchanging my template. BFN, Mattes 17:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
The problem is that if you or someone else changes the license in Mattes then the license will change on all images without this showing up in the image history. This was the main argument for why personal license templates should be substed. An alternative is to put everything in {{Mattes}} except the license into another template say User:Mattes/Mattes2. If Mattes is then cahnged to
{{User:Mattes/Mattes2}}
{{pd-self|Mattes}}
Then you can uses a substed version of {{Mattes}} to tag you're images but you'll still have User:Mattes/Mattes2 in case you want to globally change you're contact details. /Lokal_Profil 18:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I've moved the contact details to User:Mattes/Mattes2 so that {{Mattes}} can be substed. Unless you have any major objections to this I will start the substing process soon. /Lokal_Profil 17:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
seems to be fine, go ahead Mattes 03:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for having taken such a long time. I'll get started on the substing of Mattes as soon as possible. /Lokal_Profil 16:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
All done. Just remembert to use {{subst:Mattes}} on new images or put {{User:Mattes/Mattes2}} in the author field and {{pd-self|Mattes}} in the Permission field. /Lokal_Profil 23:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi Again. Don't forgett to write {{subst:Mattes}} for ne w iamges. /Lokal_Profil 14:29, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Arms HRP.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Arms HRP.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Kingboyk 12:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:U-Bahnhof-Riem West.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:U-Bahnhof-Riem West.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Kameraad Pjotr 18:53, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Categorization position

Please, follow the pattern and put the categories and the end of a picture's page description and not at the beggining, thank you. Dantadd✉ 15:18, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

yepp, Mattes 16:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:LaPo-Bayern.JPG

I see what happened now. The logo tag was added and then you added the other information. You should/could have removed the logo tag when you did that. Anyways, I've restored the image now. Sorry for the trouble. MECU≈talk 16:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Best wishes, Mattes 16:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

License concerns

Hi Mattes. I took a look at your license template Template:Mattes and I'm concerned that you may have misunderstandings about the ramification of the license. In particular, you place this text in your license: "If you use this image outside of the Wikimedia projects, I'd be happy to hear from you. If you want a license with the conditions of your choice, please email me to negotiate terms." However, the PD-self image already allows anyone, not just in Wikimedia projects, to use your image in any way they please. The attribution license is the same except that it requires only that they give you credit as the author. In other words, it's pointless to make this request, because you've already given these people permission to use your images as they please. We don't allow licenses on Commons that only give permission to use the images on Wikimedia projects, because we wish to distribute our content to others for their own use.

Also, it's confusing to use two licenses on a single template with a condition establishing which is used. I think the best way to clarify this would be to go back and subst all the images prior to the given date with the PD-self license, then remove it from your template. It would be best if you subst your template all the time, to ensure that the license is not revoked in an undetectable way, since licenses cannot be revoked.

Also, no offense, but would you mind if I altered the background colour of your talk page? It's a bit strainful to read. Thanks. Dcoetzee 00:17, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

OK, that extra template is solely valid for other licenses. It is not used anymore. Mattes 11:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:CAPT_Sinnett.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CAPT_Sinnett.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 13:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:David-goliath28.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:David-goliath28.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 192.18.43.225 16:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:FirstCrusade.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:FirstCrusade.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yonidebest Ω Talk 02:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Maybe next time you check the history, OK. The file had pd-old first but was vandlized by an IP, see http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:FirstCrusade.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=5755173 who deleted the tag. -- Mattes 03:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, Yonidebest Ω Talk 11:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Arbeitsbühnen und Teleskop-Geräte

Hallo Mattes, ich suche eine Kategorie bzw. erkenne die Notwendigkeit einer solchen für Arbeitsbühnen und Arbeitskörbe, sei es selbstfahrend oder auf LKWs montiert. Eben lud ich diese beiden Bilder aus Mülheim an der Ruhr hoch und suchte nach einer passenden Kategorie. Leider gibt es nix mit “working cage” oder “access platform” (diese Begriffe fand ich auf der Ruthmann-Homepage in Englisch, was aber nicht heißt, daß meine Bilder einen Ruthmann zeigen, die dort gesehenen scheinen sich nämlich immer in Details von meinem zu unterscheiden). Außerdem ist auch die Abgrenzung zu Gabelstaplern schwierig, weil es auch bei diesen Arbeitsbühnen gibt, die man statt der Gabeln dranmachen kann.

  • Meine Bilder
    Meine Bilder
  • aus Mülheim adR.
    aus Mülheim adR.
  • Dein Bild
    Dein Bild
  • Merlo Roto 3016
    Merlo Roto 3016

Dann schaute ich auch mal die Kran-Kategorie an, und bemerkte, dass Dein angeblicher Autokran keiner ist. Das steht auch drauf und es hängt vorne kein Haken runter. Solltest Du eine gute Kategorien-Idee haben, wäre ich dankbar. --Timo Beil 23:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Hallo - danke für die Nachricht. Wie findest Du Category:Aerial work platform? MfG, -- Mattes 11:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Danke, einverstanden.--Timo Beil 13:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Source for Image:David gegen Goliath.jpg?

Mattes, Ich bin traurig, dass mein deutsch nicht so gut ist; bitte entschuldigen Sie mich. Ich suche die ursprüngliche Quelle der Abbildung "David gegen Goliath.jpg", das verwendete, hier gehalten zu werden. Sorry, switching to englisch ... (I do not think Babelfish did a very good job with that last phrase. Even to my unpracticed eye it looks clumsy.) If you remember where you originally saw that picture, I would appreciate knowing that. In the English Wikipedia, I am Swwright, and you can reply to me here, or in my talk page, or in the article "Sling (weapon)". Vielen dank!

Well I saw it first in an arcticle but I can't remember the name. Sorry. It would be the best to look up old books for that picture. -- Mattes 22:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Very well. I will do that. Thank you! -- Swwright (in English Wikipedia).


Image:Vielfliegerkarten.Selektion.JPG

Image deletion warning Image:Vielfliegerkarten.Selektion.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
(fixed your request) --Deadstar 12:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


Image:Euro-Banknotenbündel.JPG

Image deletion warning Image:Euro-Banknotenbündel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
--|EPO| da: 15:17, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Deutsche_See-Logo.JPG

Image deletion warning Image:Deutsche_See-Logo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Lokal_Profil 16:03, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Dornier Do X.jpg

The original source, no other wiki-projects, must be given. Alex Spade 09:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Bildnominierung

ich hab dir das mal aus den Guidelines rauskopiert:

Adding a new nomination

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box (including the Image: prefix), after the text already present in the box:


eg Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:YOUR-IMAGE-FILENAME.JPG

Step 2: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:YOUR-IMAGE-FILENAME.JPG}}


--Simonizer 09:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Images of you

You have placed your images in Category:Images of Matthias Sebulke. That can be read as "images showing Matthias Sebulke", but I think you mean "images made by Matthias Sebulke". So you may want to use "Category:Images by Matthias Sebulke" for your images. /90.229.135.239 12:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

You're right, it's fixed now to Category:Work by Mattes — Thanks, Mattes 18:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

{{Mattes}}

Hallo Mattes, ich sehe gerade, dass du mit einer persönlichen Vorlage arbeitest ({{Mattes}}), die aber im normalen Vorlagen-Namensraum unter Template: steht. Das sollte nicht so sein, weil das eben der öffentliche Namensraum ist. Stell persönliche Vorlagen in deinen Benutzer-Namensraum unter User:Mattes, indem du dort eine Unterseite anlegst, z. B. User:Mattes/Tag. Diese Seite – oder jede andere – kannst du dann ganz normal mit geschweiften klammern als Vorlage einbinden, also hier mit {{Mattes/Tag}}. Gruß, Wikipeder 10:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Danke für den Rat, den ich beherzigen werde. Kann ich die erstgenannte Vorlage eigentlich auch verschieben? -- Mattes 10:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Ja, klar, oben über "move". Für die alte Seite dann einfach Schnelllöschantrag stellen. --Wikipeder 11:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, das mit der Löschung verstehe ich nicht, die Einbindung in die einzelnen Dateien geht doch dann verloren?! Ich kann ja nicht 1.700 Dateien mit der neuen Vorlage versehen (wie gern hätte ich einen Bot)... -- Mattes 11:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Category:Chaos theory

Hi. Just a note. I renamed Category:Chaos Theory to Category:Chaos theory per existing conventions and to be consistent with other categories. I hope that is fine with you. You can reply below this post. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov 07:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

thanks, that's fine! --Mattes 10:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Anzeigetafel.MVG-Busse.JPG

Das Bild ist irgendwie kaputt. Es könnte auch sein, daß Wikipedia Sonderzeichen wie den Punkt im Dateinamen nicht mag (ich hab das erfahren mit z.B. Plus-Zeichen im Dateinamen). Meine Bitte also: korrektes Bild hochladen und den Punkt im Namen durch einen Unterstrich ersetzen. --L.Willms 07:50, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Anscheinend war die Datei defekt, in der Vorschau im PC wurde es angezeigt, in voller Größe nicht mehr. Habe jetzt neues Bild drübergeladen, an dem extra Punkt lat es also nicht. --Mattes 10:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Bilder des Deutschen Museums Verkehrszentrum

(The following lines are on a possible copyright violation with the pictures on Category:Deutsches Museum Verkehrszentrum)

Hallo Mattes!

Ich habe mich sehr gefreut, einige sehr schöne Aufnahmen des ICE-S (als Baureihe 401 bezeichnet) aus dem Deutschen Museum Verkehrszentrum auf Wikipedia Commons zu finden. Ich bin seit Wochen auf der Suche nach brauchbaren Bildern; da dieser schöne Zug ja nun nun nicht mehr unterwegs ist, können wir keinen aktuellen Fotos machen und eine der beiden Hälften steht in München. Ich hatte daher schon vor ein paar Wochen dort angefragt, ob wir Fotos machen und verwenden dürften. Dies wurde sehr freundlicher, aber bestimmt, abgelehnt. Da Fotos der Wikipedia Commons auch für kommerzielle Zwecke verwendet werden können, hat man Fotos explizit verweigert. Hast du es denn geschafft, eine Genehmigung für die Aufnahmen zu bekommen? Das wäre prima, dann könnte man die gleich im ICE-S-Artikel verbauen.

Viele Grüße aus Nürnberg Peter --Bigbug21 21:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Hallo, es gibt weder ein Fotografierverbot[2] noch habe ich bei meinen Aufnahmen der Exponate urheberrechliche Bedenken. Du verwechselt wohl die Aufnahmen des Deutschen Museums zur Weiternutzung (Bitte um freie Lizenz) mit den Aufnahmen durch Besucher. Die in der Kategorie enthaltenen Fotos sind alle durch Commons-Mitglieder gefertigt worden. Es ist beispielsweise unerheblich, ob ich den ICE nun in „freier Wildbahn“ oder in einem Museum fotografiere. Man darf halt die Werke des Museums (Grafiken, Texte u.ä.) nicht ohne weiteres veröffentlichen. Bei Logos wird's dann ganz knifflig...
Sag mir mal Bescheid, welche anderen Objekte Du gerne bei Commons sehen möchtest, weil ich nächstes Jahr nochmal in das Museum gehen werde. In den drei Stunden Besuchszeit habe ich nicht mal 1 % der Exponate fotografieren können (die bislang hochgeladenen Bilder bewegen sich im Promillebereich)... MfG, --Mattes 07:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Mattes,
vielen Dank für deine Nachricht. Danke auch für das Angebot, noch fehlende Aufnahmen aus dem Verkehrszentrum zu machen. Soweit ich das sehe, wäre das leider nicht so ganz legal. Zur Sache: Ich hatte Ende Juni beim Verkehrszentrum angefragt und explizit erklärt, wir würden gerne einmal das Fahrzeug von innen und außen fotografieren und dann der Wikipedia zur Verfügung stellen. Dies ist die Antwort:

Sehr geehrter (...),

danke für Ihre Anfrage und Ihr Interesse am Deutschen Museum. Generell ist bei uns Fotografieren und Filmen zu privaten Zwecken erlaubt. Anträge auf Aufnahmen für Veröffentlichungen von meiner Abteilung bearbeitet.
Eine Erlaubnis zur Veröffentlichung von Bildern auf Wikipedia kann ich

Ihnen nicht erteilen. Bilder, die auf Wikipedia veröffentlicht und in die internationale Wikipedia-Fotodatenbank eingefügt sind, fallen unter die GNU-Lizenz für freie Dokumentation. Diese erlaubt ausdrücklich "... die Vervielfältigung, Verbreitung und Veränderung des Werkes, auch zu kommerziellen Zwecken ...". Da die Mittel für die Ausstellungen und den Betrieb des Deutschen Museums aus der öffentlichen Hand kommen, ist es uns nicht gestattet, einer solchen Vereinbarung zuzustimmen. Ob eine kommerzielle Nutzung stattfinden würde ist darüber hinaus nicht kontrollierbar.

Ich bitte Sie hierfür um Verständnis!
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
(...)

Ich denke, das ist eindeutig. Da die Aufnahmen unter den Lizenzen der Wikipedia auch kommerziell verwendet werden können, ist die Veröffentlichung von Fotos aus dem Verkehrszentrum nicht zulässig. Die Bilder fallen definitiv nicht unter die Panoramafreiheit, das Verkehrszentrum kann daher das Anfertigen von Fotos, oder, wie hier, eben die Veröffentlichung, verbieten. Es wäre natürlich klasse, wenn wir einen Weg finden würden, die Fotos für die Wikipedia nutzbar zu machen, aber da scheint es keinen zu geben. Siehst du da eine Möglichkeit? Ansonsten würde ich vorschlagen, die Bilder -- so be****** das ist -- zu löschen. Wie siehst du das? --Bigbug21 22:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Eigenartig, ich bin zwei Mal von den Wärtern angesprochen worden, weil ich meine Stativbeine nicht eingezogen habe. Vom Fotografierverbot haben die wohl nichts gewußt oder es gibt es nicht. Rechtlich kann man zwar das Fotografieren im Rahmen des Hausrechts verbieten, aber sonst sind die reinen Objekte (in natura) ja nicht unbedingt generell per se irgendwie geschützt (Bildrechte). Wie oben erwähnt macht es erstmal keinen Unterschied, ob ein Fahrzeug irgendwo herumfährt oder in einem Museum gegen Entgelt gezeigt wird. Allerdings habe ich nicht so die große Ahnung von der Materie, vielleicht erzähle ich auch gerade Mist... Ich glaube, Veröffentlichungsrechte für Fotos von Massenprodukten gibt es nur in der Theorie (wird in weiten Teilen geduldet). Ich würde vorschlagen, daß man das Thema freie Lizenz für Aufnahmen in Mussen einfach mal in einem größeren Rahmen ausdiskutiert, z.B. bei Commons talk:Lizenzen oder bei Commons:Forum. Meine Fotografien von Exponaten anderer Museen sowie Flughafen- und Flugzeuginnenaufnahmen im dreistelligen Bereich, die ich hier hochgeladen habe, haben bislang auch niemanden, einschl. der Admins, gestört. Man muß es auch nicht unbedingt darauf anlegen, dass Dateien gelöscht werden, oder? Generell wäre aber eine Klarstellung zu Aufnahmen von Innenräumen und Produkten) mal interessant. --Mattes 22:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Mattes, nachdem die Sache über Monate liegen geblieben ist, hat mich meine Termin- und Aufgabenplanung heute etwas unsanft daran erinnert, dass diese Sache weiterhin offenbar. Traurig wie es ist, gibt es keine Grundlage, gegen den Willen des Museums Aufnahmen aus seinen Innenräumen zu veröffentlichen. Siehe dazu insbesondere Panoramafreiheit bei Innenaufnahmen. Ich würde selbst deine Fotos für den im Aufbau befindlichen Artikel zum ICE-Vorläufer InterCityExperimental sehr, sehr gerne verwenden, aber wir können nicht gegen den klar artikulierten Willen des Museums Bilder von deren Exponaten einfügen und so tun, als wüssten wir von nichts. Lieber machen wir jetzt einen Schnitt und Löschen die Bilder, bevor uns das in ein paar Monaten oder Jahren sehr unsanft auf die Füße fällt. Was denkst du? --Bigbug21 08:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Hallo, also ersmal danke für die Nachricht. Ich glaube man muß hier unterscheiden, was man unter Innenaufnahmen versteht. Ich denke, geschützt sind nur innenarchitektonische Elemente/Objekte. Die Exponate fallen eigentlich nicht darunter, denke ich. Leider bin ich hier kein Experte. Vielleicht könnte man das an höhrer Stelle, z.B. bei Village Pump, anbringen. Nicht zuletzt ist die Frage aber ein Problem des Fotografen, inwieweit er evtl. Rechte nicht beachtet.
MfG, --Mattes 09:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Hmm... ich habe mich gerade nochmal eine Viertelstunde durch die diversen Bildrechte-Seiten der deutschen Wikipedia gewühlt. Laut de:Wikipedia:Fotos von fremdem Eigentum sind Fotos von Gegenständen in Museen umstritten, aber geduldet. Insofern lege ich diese Sache nun zu den Akten und binde die Fotos in den deutschen ICE-V-Artikel ein. --Bigbug21 20:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
...Gott sei dank :-) Falls Du noch Bilder vom Verkehrszentrum oder vom Nürberger Eisenbahnmuseum brauchst, sag Bescheid OK... MfG, --Mattes 21:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Also, wenn du das schon so anbietest, würde ich sagen: Das Mock-Up des ICE 3 im DB Museum (Designstudie eines Endwagens) von außen und innen und eventuell die beiden Wagen des ICE-V, die dort abgestellt sein sollen?! Vom ICE-V in München wären weitere Ansichten nicht schlecht, beispielsweise von der Seite. --Bigbug21 20:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

MUC-BKK Price

Hey, I saw the boarding pass picture you uploaded to the boarding pass article. I was just wondering, how in the world did you get such a good deal MUC-BKK?????!!!!! 75.22.182.28 05:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Flugschein.JPG (2006) It was actually an expensive fare. Don't get impressed by the imprinted 99.69 EUR for it does not represent the price clearly. I don't know the reason for this but the fare was around 700 EUR rt. --Mattes 05:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Mongol Empire map.gif

Thanks about the map :) sorry I cant remember what typeface I used and dont seem to have the original file.. if i find it Ill let you know. regards, --Astrokey44 13:33, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply anyway... --Mattes 20:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ausblühungen-Neonlicht.JPG

Hi Matthias, I tried to send you an e-mail twice about this picture, but it does not seem to reach you. Or did it? I tried to do some work on this image. Are you interested, or can I can delete it from my PC? Kind regards, Jan Arkesteijn 15:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello, I haven't received such. I would suggest not to send any more e-mails. It is not a safe way in means of a delivering guarantee, sometimes it get's lost in the process and in some cases they cannot be delievered due to a in-box overflow. Just post your mail here. --Mattes 15:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
I did some work on this picture, but I am not happy with the result. Maybe you are. I tried to send you the picture by e-mail, because I don't want to upload it under my name. Kind regards, Jan Arkesteijn 15:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Holographische Elemente ("Identigram") auf der Vorderseite eines deutschen Personalausweises

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Hologramm.JPG 

 Can you explain the faint images on the right of the photo? Do

you have any idea what it is, the images or imagery? Could it be a type of photon cipher block like encryption of something? 

 I am not talking about the stars.

 I seem to be encountering similiar imagery in some of my photographs and videos


Dboots 06:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

No idea what the graphical symbols are called, but I guess these are en:Regular polygons. BTW, they are not just located on that particular spot but rather ontop of most of the entire picture of the ID card (not seen while the photo was taken), see http://www.bundesdruckerei.de/de/iddok/2_1/2_1_6.html BFN, --Mattes 10:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Holigram

Are you familiar with cryptography homotophy?


Dboots 04:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC) ?Mattes 05:05, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

holigrams/images

The link you sent me too was not the same as your photo.

Am I to assume you put each and every one of of those images on your Holigrapy photo, including the images on the right of the photo that I was referrring to?

Dboots 06:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

That was an official photo of my ID card and the first image of the Bundesdruckerei link does have exactly the same pattern on it. --Mattes 07:28, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
My eyes do not know what to look for to compare. What exact pattern

are you speaking about that you feel is on the ID link and your own ID. Can you describe the pattern you are referring to? Dboots 18:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

I've told you that already, see above. --Mattes 08:09, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

I did see above. I printed it and looked at it with a magnifying glass many times. The stars around your face have been placed different than the ones in the other ID. The area over your face is only one layer of images compared to the other links ID which seems to have at least 3 layers deep of 3D type data form images. On the other ID over half of the left side of her face is covered with green. I can see that evidently, what is on your id is about only 1/4 of the total holigraphic image that is on the other link which covers a lot larger area of her face than your picture. 

 I can see that under the other layers of holigraphic images

on the other links ID, that somehow your ID appears to only have the bottom layer of holigraphic images that are also on the other ID. 

 How did you get the other layers off, so only the bottom dimension

of holigraphic images only showed on your picture? 66.53.99.143 08:09, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Proposal regarding Commons Photographers categories

Hi, You are currently using a Commons Photographer user template on your user page. It has been proposed to redefine the templates and a vote is currently on-going. If interested, I encourage you to participate in the voting process. -- Slaunger 13:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:HAJ-Cockpit window shield-B737-500.jpg

Für mich ist obiges Bild übrigens eindeutig ein Mitglied der A320-Familie und keine Boeing 737-500. --my name 13:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Danke für die Korrektur, hab' mich wohl vertan. --Mattes 13:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Plasticuffs closeup.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Plasticuffs closeup.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Abu badali 16:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi again, the image description actually seems to have a problem: it refers to the wp:en: page, which in return refers to commons. Which one came up first? Or is the image duplicate?
Thanks in advance for your help, and best regards from France,
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 15:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Icone-religion.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Icone-religion.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 23:43, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


Deprecated language templates

Hi,
I just wanted to let you know that {{English}}, {{Deutsch}}, {{Polski}}, {{Français}} and so on are now deprecated and should not be used any more.
You can use {{en|Your English text}}, {{de|your Deutsch text}}, {{pl|your Polish text}}, {{fr|your French text}}, etc. instead :)
Best regards,
P.S. I've also updated your template subpage, I hope you won't mind about this :)
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 15:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, that's great. I will take it in mind in the future. C.U., --Mattes 13:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


Deutsche Briefmarken nach Jahrgängen

Hallo Mattes, ich habe eben gesehen, dass Du für die deutschen Briefmarkenjahrgänge einzelne Kategorien angelegt hast. Hierfür herzlichen Dank. In den letzten Tagen habe ich auch mal einen Artikelentwurf in der deutschen Wikipedia für die einzelnen Jahrgänge gemacht. Schau es Dir doch mal bitte an: de:Benutzer:Kandschwar/Briefmarken 2007 bzw. auch die Diskussion unter de:Portal Diskussion:Philatelie#Idee für neue Artikelserie. Des weiteren hätte ich noch eine kleine Bitte an Dich, beim Hochladen von deutschen Briefmarken die noch gültig sind, mache ich immer noch einen kleinen schwarzen Balken rein um diese zu "entwerten". Das ganze hat auch mal, soweit ich mich erinnern kann, in dem Vorlagenbaustein drin gestanden. Viele grüße --kandschwar 08:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Hallo! Danke für die Mitteilung. Es hat mich sehr gewundert, daß die deutschen Postwertzeichen so schlecht kategorisiert waren. Deine Ausarbeitung macht einen guten Eindruck. Das mit dem Balken sieht nach Arbeit aus, die Zeit dazu habe ich nicht.
Der Balken dient wohl dazu, daß keine Totalfälschungen (Farbkopien etc.) gemacht werden, die Post veröffentlicht ihre Briefmarken auf ihren Websites allerdings nirgends mit einem Entwertungsstreifen (womöglich gibt es die Vorschrift nicht mehr). Mal eine kurze Frage: Template:PD-German stamps kategorisiert bei Einbindung automatisch mit Category:Stamps of Germany — ist das Absicht (find' ich nicht praktikabel)? Ciao - muß los, --Mattes 08:39, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Hallo, ja das stimmt, die Kategorisierung wurde bisher etwas stiefmütterlich behandelt. Liegt aber auch mit sicherheit daran, das es einfach zu wenige Leute gibt, die sich darum kümmern und ich hatte auch nicht unbedingt die Lust gehabt mich ganz alleine darum zu kümmern. Deine kurze Frage bezüglich der Vorlage, kann ich auch gut verstehen, ich hatte das damals "einfach mal so eingebaut" um überhaupt eine Kategoriezuordnung auf die schnelle machen zu können. Es wird aber doch recht schnell unübersichtlich. Ich würde daher vorschlagen, dass wir diese Kategorieeinbindung in der Vorlage rausnehmen, sobald alle Briefmarken ihrem jeweiligen Jahrgang zugeordnet worden sind. Auch sehe ich eine Trennung von Dauermarken und Jahresmarken für sinnvoll. Sowie für die jeweiligen "Ausgabeländer" (Deutsches Reich, DDR, BRD, Berlin, Deutschland). Gruß --kandschwar 09:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Ich übernehme die Patenschaft für die Pwz der Deutschen Post und der DBP zwecks “recat”. Vielleicht könntest Du das Vorhaben samt einer Art Konzept irgendwo hier bei Commons oder beim Portal Post anbringen? Bis demnächst, --Mattes 12:23, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi Mattes, sorry, dass ich mich erst jetzt melde. Bei den Kategorienamen zwischen 1949 und 1991 sollten wir noch die Unterscheidung nach West- und Ostdeutschland, sowie Berlin machen. Gruß --kandschwar 16:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Hast Recht, mir schwebt folgende Lösung vor:
  • Alle in der der BRD und in der DDR sowie von deren Vorgängerorganisationen ausgegebenen Briefmarken (...da gibt's noch mehr Kategorien zu erstellen) erhalten die Zuordnung Category:… stamps of Germany nur als Oberkategorie
  • Für die nach der Wiedervereinigung der beiden deutschen Postorganisationen herausgegebenen Marken könnte man noch Category:… stamps of Germany (Deutsche Post AG) erstellen — “AG” deswegen, damit man nicht mit der uralten Deutschen Post durcheinanderkommt.
Ich warte jetzt aber erstmal auf Reaktionen, evtl. sollte man das ganze auch auf dem Portal besprechen, dann hätte man evtl. auch mehr Mitarbeiter bei der ganzen Sache (wird wohl zu zweit ein paar Wochen bzw. Monate dauern). --Mattes 16:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Mattes, hast Recht, das sollten wir im de:Portal:Philatelie besprechen. Bis dann und gruß --kandschwar 20:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Moin ihr zwei. Also da ich selbst Philatelist bin und in der DE-WP im Bildbereich (DÜP, Bildrechte, etc.) aktiv bin, würde ich euch auf jeden Fall helfen. Derzeit arbeite ich grad die alte Vorlage Bild-PD auf DE-WP ab, wenn ich damit in 1 Woche durch bin steig ich hier gerne mit ein, denn dann brauch ich eh erstmal ne Pause von der DE-WP und komme mal wieder für ein paar Wochen in die Commons. ChristianBier 11:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Das ist eine gute Nachricht, daß Du mithilfst. Das Chaos muß mal ein Ende haben... Also die angekündigte Pause bei WP hatte ich auch mal vor, aber ich habe es nicht durchgehalten (ständiges “kribbeln” und “auf-die-Beobachtungsliste-Schielen”). Viel Glück dabei, -- Mattes 13:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Naja, Pause kann ich das auch nicht nennen. Die hab ich schon mehrfach gemacht, aber eher aus notwendigen als aus freiwilligen Gründen. Ich werde auch weiter in der DE-WP aktiv sein, aber im Bildbereich dort (DÜP) gibt es gottseidank mittlerweile einige Helfer. Die kommen auch ein paar Wochen dort ohne mich aus. Mit 15000 bearbeiteten Bildern in 4 Wochen dort, habe ich meinen Soll erstmal erfüllt *g*. Artikelarbeit mach ich wie gesagt weiter. Vielleicht auch ein paar Transfers nach Commons. Aber hauptsächlich werd ich ab 8. Dezember hier sein und mich um Kategorisierungen kümmern. ChristianBier 13:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
ICh hab mal angefangen, die Kategorie Stamps of Germany abzuarbeiten. Dafür habe ich u.a. die Category:Deutsche Post stamps angelegt, die ab sofort alle Marken der Deutschen Post AG seit 1995 enthalten wird, die die Vorlage PD-German stamps enthalten. So wie auch bei Bundespost und DDR sowie Deutsches Reich ist die entsprechende Unterkategorisierung mehr als überfällig. So wird die Kat zwar nach und nach leerer, aber wer die Marken sucht, kann auch über die Unterkategorien auf den richtigen Weg kommen. Ich schaffe derzeit nicht viele Marken am Tag, aber wäre schön wenn noch ein paar Leute mithelfen würden. Um die neue Vorlage durch die Kat korrekt einzubinden müsste bei den entsprechenden Marken ein "Null-Edit" gemacht werden. Dann passt das auch. ChristianBier 22:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
...hast ja schon einiges geschaffft. Bei der Portaldiskussion scheint es nicht so viele Interessenten geben. Notfalls ziehen wir das ganze zu Dritt durch. --Mattes 13:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Jep, aber das schaffen wir auch. Vielleicht können wir 3 auch noch einige Lücken schließen. Übrigens schwebt mir eine Vorlage (Infobox) vor, wo wir die philatelistischen Daten erfassen können wie Ersttag, Herausgeber, Grafiker, MichelNr., Zähnung, etc. Was sagst du dazu? ChristianBier 18:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Finde ich gut, kann ich aber nicht ausarbeiten... --Mattes 21:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Nicht so schlimm. Ich würde die ausarbeiten und dir dann eine kleine Einweisung zur Benutzung geben. Denke mal bis Freitag hab ich die Vorlage fertig. ChristianBier 23:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Gut, bin gespannt! --Mattes 09:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
So hab sie soweit fertig. Schau Sie dir mal an. Template:Philately Vielleicht kommst du mit der Einbauvorlage klar, wenn nicht, frag mich einfach. ChristianBier 15:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
gut gelungen, bloß fehlt nicht noch Name der Postorganisation, Motiv, Nennwert/Postwert, Ausgabepreis (Verkaufspreis) und evtl. die Serie... ? Mattes 20:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi Ihr beiden, sorry, das ich mich erst jetzt wieder melde. Ich hatte auch mal eine Semiprofessionelle Vorlage erstellt. Aber die von Chrsitian ist natürlich schöner, allerdings fehlen noch ein paar Sachen, wie Größe, Papier, Druckverfahren, Druckerei usw. Die Angabe der Michel-Nummer würde ich eventuell sogar komplett draußen lassen, weil:

Zitat aus Michel-Deutschland-Spezial 2004 Band 2: Die Verwendung der MICHEL-Numeriung – auch einzelner MICHEL-Nummern – in Katalogen, Alben und sonstigen systematischen Briefmarkenverzeichnissen ist ohne Genehmigung des Verlages nicht gestattet (ausgenommen in kostenlos verteilten Händlerpreislisten).

Hier könnten wir uns aber mal überlegen, ob wir nicht den Verlag mal anschreiben sollten und uns eventuell die Genehmigung für die Veröffentlichung einholen sollten, solange diese aber nicht existiert, würde ich es lieber lassen. Gruß --kandschwar 20:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Vorlage

Philately |ERSTAUSGABE= |Motiv / Thema= |ENTWURF= |AUFLAGE= |Druckverfahren= |Druckerei= |Bogen= Bogengröße(Anzahl der Marken) Markenheft usw. |ZAEHNUNG= |MICHEL= |Lizenzbaustein= |SCAN= }}

Das mit der Genehmigung für die Numerierung könnte man tatsächlich mal machen, ich komme allerdings nicht dazu. Die neuen Erweitungen sind gut. Jetzt fällt mir noch etwas ein: Einfärben der „Parameter“ so wie Template:Information? --Mattes 21:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Also: MichelNr. sollte kein Problem darstellen. Als mittlerweile öffentlich benutzte Numerierung (auch in der Fachpresse) sollte das nicht so dramatisch sein. Außerdem hat die Numerierung keine Schöpfungshöhe. Bogengröße lasse ich weg, weil, z.B. in Dtl. seit 1995 eigentlich alle Marken in 5x2 oder 2x5 produziert werden. Lizenzbaustein bleibt auch draußen, der kommt weiterhin unter die Vorlage (also ausserhalb). Und Postorganisatuon bleibt auch draußen, das wird ja durch die Lizenz geregelt. Oder habt ihr Einwände? ChristianBier 23:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Achja und wegen der Einfärbung wie bei Template:Information -> wollte ich nicht machen, sieht so farblich total gedrungen aus (die Vorlage Information gefällt mir eh nicht). Hab deswegen mit fettem Text gearbeitet. ChristianBier 23:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Die Michel-Numerierung kann eigentlich gar nicht geschützt werden, da in D das Zitierrecht gilt. Die Einfärbung kann man erstmal zurückstellen. Die Organisation sollte m.E. schon eingefügt werden, weil man sonst auf die Kat. angewiesen ist — und das ist nun mal nicht Sinn und Zweck einer Bildbeschreibung. --Mattes 00:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Okay, ich baus ein. ChristianBier 02:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Danke :)-- Mattes 07:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Die Vorlage darf jetzt verwendet werden. ChristianBier 13:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Gut, mache mich nach der “Recat”-Aktion mal 'ran. --19:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Schaumbad.JPG

Image deletion warning Image:Schaumbad.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
MichaelMaggs 13:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
That's my wife - she gave her verbal consent for publication. She does not have an email account and does not understand an English written consent. Is it really necessary to have an OTRS ticket to cover personality right for close relatives? I find that a bit exaggerated. It is also not the problem of the Website or it's publisher if a face is shown which is not covered with personality right consent anyway. --Mattes 17:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Line0535.jpg

Could you take a look at Image:Line0535.jpg, which you uploaded? The license tag is one that is now deprecated, and the link to a source is now dead. I'm not sure on what basis this is claimed as public domain. - Jmabel | talk 09:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

NOAA is PD, I dunno about the link - the pic was taken from en and transferred to Commons. --Mattes 16:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Briefmarkenserie Blumen

Grüße dich. Ich hab mir mal erlaubt unter Category:Serie Blumen unser Catsystem mit dieser Markenserie fortzusetzen. Sollten auch alle Marken drin sein, die da bisher in der Serie erschienen sind. Hab auch versucht soweit alle Marken einheitlich zu bennennen bis auf die die schon da waren. ChristianBier 13:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Hallo. Danke für die Neuanlage – gute Idee. es wäre sogar demnächst zu überlegen, ob man eine übergeordnete Kat. dazu bilden könnte: Category:Deutsche Briefmarkenserie o.ä. ...aber eins nach dem anderen. Ciao, --Mattes 13:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Ihr beiden, die Überkategorie Deutsche Briefmarkenserien, wäre alleine schon deshalb Sinnvoll, das niemand auf die Idee kommt, andere Briefmarken mit Blumen drauf in diese Kategorie einzuordnen. Eventuell sollte man auch noch den genauen Seriennamen, bzw. den Ausgabezeitraum mit hinzunehmen. Themenwechsel: Wir müssten auch mal die Lizenzvorlage bei der DPAG anpassen, es gibt ja jetzt auch sogenannte "Plusbriefe" mit eingedruckten Werten. Hierbei handelt es aber nicht um "amtliche Postwertzeichen" sondern um ... keine Ahnung wie das jetzt offiziell heißt, aber es ist jedenfalls keine Briefmarke im Namen des Gesetzes. Zumal auch das Wort "Deutschland" fehlt, Es steht nur "Deutsche Post" drauf, sowie ein 2-D-Code, und ein X-Beliebiges Bild des Absenders. Ich hoffe Ihr wisst was ich meine. --kandschwar 15:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Ich weiß was du meinst. Ich mach mir mal nen Kopf. Sobald meine Adminkandidatur hier durch is (übermorgen), mach ich das fix. Wenn ein Admin da was dran bastelt sieht das meist etwas anders aus, als wenn normale User in den Lizenzvorlagen rum"fuschen". ChristianBier 20:39, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Habe mal Category:Deutsche Briefmarkenserie angelegt. --Mattes 22:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Sehr fein. Wir sollten auf jeden Fall mal als nächstes über die Kategorisierung der Marken von Baden, Sachsen, Bayern etc. diskutieren, da gibts in der Stamps of Germany dringend Handlungsbedarf. ChristianBier 23:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
…da gebe ich Dir Recht. Hier bewegt sich endlich mal was! Ich bin leider derzeit ein Mensch mit “Mobilitätseinschränkungen” und kann nicht sehr viel schreiben --Mattes 23:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh na da auf jeden Fall gute Besserung. Kann mir vorstellen, das sowas für engagierte Wikipedia&Commons-Mitarbeiter ein echt schwerer Schlag ist. (gott sei dank hab ich meine Finger versichert *g*). ChristianBier 00:04, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
So, die Kats sind jetzt da und Unterkats von Category:Area stamps of Germany. Nun zu meiner nächsten Problematik: Wir kategorisieren derzeit alle deutschen Marken in die Jahreskategorien 1XXX stamps of Germany. Nun gibt es aber auch unter Category:German Democratic Republic stamps einige Jahreskategorien. Wollen wir die noch mit in die neuen Jahreskats überführen? Ich wäre dafür, weil, wenn nicht, müssten wir sonst auch beim Deutschen Reich extra Jahreskats erstellen. Hat das Sinn? Denke eher nicht. Was meinst du bzw. was meint ihr? ChristianBier 01:04, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Meinst wohl soetwas: Category:1952 German Democratic Republic stamps mit Category:1952 German Democratic Republic stamps...? Hab einfach mal diese zwei zu Demonstrationszwecken angelegt und eine Datei der Category:German Democratic Republic stamps, 1952 zugeordnet. Hmm, es wäre so logisch und es wäre auch sehr genau (vielleicht auch zu genau, weil es teilweise nur ein oder zwei Zuordnungen pro “Jahreskat + DRR” gäbe). Bin hier etwas unentschlossen, bei der DBP sollte man dieses System aber anstreben, da mehr Briefmarken herausgegeben wurden. --Mattes 09:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Na dann erst mal gute Besserung Mattes. Und JUHU, endlich mal ein deutscher Admin hier in den Commons der sich mit Briefmarken auskennt. Bisher bin ich da nur auf US-Amerikaner gestoßen, die mich nicht verstehen wollten ;-) Da weiß ich ja jetzt, wen ich in Zukunft direkt ansprechen kann. So genug geplänkelt.

Also bei den DDR-Briefmarken wäre ich schon dafür das ganze auch nach Jahrgängen schön zu untergliedern. Mein Michel schreibt da was von knapp 3365 Nummern die zwischen 1949 und 1990 herausgegeben worden sind. Die Allierten Marken noch nicht mitgerechnet. Die Deutsche Bundespost hat in der gleichen Zeit erst 1476 Marken herausgegeben! Die DDR hat es schon verstanden damit Devisien in die Republik zu bekommen. Mein Michel reicht zwar nur bis zum April 2004 aber die aktuellste marke die dort drin ist, ist die Nummer 2396. Also immer noch deutlich unter der Zahl von der DDR. Von daher ist die Jahrgangskategorie bei der DDR noch viel mehr erforderlich. Viele Grüße --kandschwar 16:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wat.sisaket.jpg

Hello !

Don't you think this picture of yours could be deleted ? It's blurry, the name is wrong and there is now plenty of better pics on the same subject.

Chaoborus 17:47, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

image: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Cabin.B737-500.jpg

image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Cabin.B737-500.jpg is not from Boeing aircraft at all, it is from Aisbuses A3XX- series aircraft. Please remove it!

See: http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0445170/L/ and you understand! Compare the overhead panel.


Image:Red_bathrobe-worn.JPG

Image deletion warning Image:Red_bathrobe-worn.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
-Nard 05:42, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


Image:Va_2euro_sede.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Va_2euro_sede.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
-Nard 05:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Häagen-Dasz-Logo.jpg

Pay attention to copyright Image:Häagen-Dasz-Logo.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Papa November 15:52, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:General Wilhelm Rediess.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:General Wilhelm Rediess.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Melanom 06:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


Image:Nobel Prize.png

Image deletion warning Image:Nobel Prize.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
--Mormegil 17:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Philosophie.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Philosophie.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 16:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


Image:Clan Nesbitt badge.gif

Pay attention to copyright Image:Clan Nesbitt badge.gif has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Celtus 09:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Va 2euro sede.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Va 2euro sede.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 07:38, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Larsson_Midvinterblot_detail.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Larsson_Midvinterblot_detail.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Thuresson 19:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Baby.JPG

Image deletion warning Image:Baby.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
216.144.126.215 06:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Category:War animals

Category discussion notification Category:War animals has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Categories

Hi, I'm trying to resolve some category difficulties, partially of my own creation... :-( Your contribution appreciated! JackyR 23:03, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll help. --Mattes 03:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Deutsche Poststempel

Hi Mattes, ich habe mal für Poststempel der Deutschen Post AG eine eigene Lizenzvorlage erstellt, nämlich {{PD-German postmarks}}. Genauso werde ich bei Bedarf auch die Kats und Vorlagen für DDR, Bundespost, SBZ und deutsches Reich anlegen. Mir ist die Idee gekommen, als ich mir überlegt habe, dass man Sonderstempel zur Artikelillustration nutzen könnte. Die Vorlage und die Kats sind aber nicht für gestempelte Briefmarken geeignet. Ich habe sie lediglich für reine Stempelabdrücke erstellt. Was meinst du, besteht Bedarf an Sonderstempelabbildungen in Commons? Habe eine größere Kollektion von blank Stempelabdrücken hier auf dem PC. ChristianBier 20:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Hallo Mattes und ChristianBier, die Idee hört sich zwar interessant an. Allerdings bin ich mir nicht sicher, ob die Stempel tatsächlich ein "amtliches Werk" im Sinne des Gesetzes darstellen. Gruß --kandschwar 10:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Darüber hab ich mich natürlich zuvor informiert. Soweit es Tages- oder Sonderstempel sind, die von der Deutschen Post herausgegeben werden, sind es amtliche Werke. Stempel privater Postdienstleister und Freistempel mit Firmenwerbeeindruck zählen nicht als amtliche Werke und fallen somit aus der Vorlage raus. Werbeeindrücke der Post, wie die bekannten Briefzentrennebenstempel fallen aber drunter. Bei den anderen kann man meist mit "frei von Schöpfungshöhe", also PD-inilegable (hoffe ich hab das jetzt richtig geschrieben) argumentieren. ChristianBier 13:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Christian: Gute Idee, dann mal “frohes hochladen!”! --Mattes 13:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Die ersten sind drin, weitere werden folgen. ChristianBier 18:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
gut Mattes 03:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattes/Archive_2&oldid=371844263"