User talk:Malchen53/Archive 1

A bowl of strawberries for you!

ich wollte das mal ausprobieren AlterWolf49 (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Rüthen das Stadtmodell Inschrift im neuen Rathaus.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:36, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Gute Fotos AlterWolf49 (talk) 00:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Katholische Kirche Kühlungsborn

Hallo Malchen53, auf vielen (z.B. hier) Fotos sind Werke von Künstlern zu sehen, die dem Urheberrecht unterliegen und in der Kirche gilt leider die Panoramafreiheit nicht. Gibt es eine Möglichkeit, eine Freigabe für die Fotos zu bekommen? Gruß. --Schiwago (talk) 07:10, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Schiwago, vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Ich werde versuchen mich in den nächsten Tagen mit den entsprechenden Stellen in Verbindung zu setzen und eine Freigabe für die Bilder zu bekommen. Mit bestem Gruß --Malchen53 (talk) 16:43, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Denkmalvorlage für Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

Hallo Malchen53,

Du hattest mich wegen der Vorlage Template:Baudenkmal (Nordrhein-Westfalen) angesprochen. Für Denkmale in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern gibt es vergleichbares wohl nicht. In dieser Kategorie finden sich eine Reihe von Vorlagen. Eine allgemeine zur Kennzeichnung von Kulturdenkmälern in Deutschland findest Du hier mit Beschreibung. Es gibt auch ein Commons:WikiProjekt Vorlagen, das soeben von mir entdeckt wurde. Vielleicht kann dort jemand helfen. Lieber Gruß und weiterhin viel Erfolg --Asio 20:55, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Propsteikirche Brilon, Andachtsraum, Mondsichelmadonna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alme, St. Ludgerus, Pietà auf dem Seitenaltar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --A.Savin 15:44, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.--Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Tipp: Ich empfehle keine Textabschnitte von der Diskussionsseite zu entfernen, am besten du legst ein Archiv an. Viele Grüße--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:09, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Steinsplitter, ich habe Deine Einträge leider erst gerade mitbekommen, sorry. Ich werde mir ein Archiv anlagen. Leider fehlt mir manchmal noch die Erfahrung. Gruß--Malchen53 (talk) 15:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Joa, das ist kein problem. Ich kans dir nicht verbieten abschnitte zu entferen, in der regel werden solche Archiviert. Viele Grüße--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:54, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Kannst Du mir einen Link geben wie ich mir ein Archiv anlege? --Malchen53 (talk) 16:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup LG--Steinsplitter (talk) 16:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Danke!! LG--Malchen53 (talk) 16:47, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kottmannshausen, Gartenbahn Huserland 9.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:31, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grömitz, der Hafen 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:40, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cumulonimbus praecipitatio, Kühlungsborn, Ostsee.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrus 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Perfect--Llorenzi 16:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, Kurpark, Mahonia aquifolium 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahonia aquifolium 1, Kurpark, Brilon, Germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 18:37, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, Kurpark, Limonit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 12:47, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quarz, Brilon, Kurpark, Germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is OK, but I would suggest a wider crop at the left and right. Have you got space left? --Tuxyso 21:30, 13 May 2013 (UTC)  Done Is it better ?--Malchen53 12:13, 14 May 2013 (UTC) Better. QI now. --Tuxyso 06:42, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, Hoppecke, St. Mariä-Heimsuchung, Alte Kirche, Jesusfigur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, Hoppecke, St. Mariä-Heimsuchung, Blick von der Empore auf den Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Only 1MB. Do you have a version with higher resolution? --Dirtsc 10:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)  Support Sorry for my question above. Quality and resolution are good. --Dirtsc 06:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, Hoppecke, St. Mariä-Heimsuchung, Blick von der Empore auf den Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Only 1MB. Do you have a version with higher resolution? --Dirtsc 10:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)  Support Sorry for my question above. Quality and resolution are good. --Dirtsc 06:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kühlungsborn, Strandstraße mit Bäder Express.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Leidr ist die Front der "Lokomotive" überbelichtet. --Berthold Werner 20:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC) Neue Version hochgeladen. --Malchen53 11:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:27, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kühlungsborn, Wellen am Strand, (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:43, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Malchen53, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möhnesee-Körbecke, St.Pankratiuskirche, Tanchelinus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:48, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Malchen53, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Werl, denkmalgeschützte Propsteikirche, Pietà von Gerhard Gröninger, aus der Zeit um 1600.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:09, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Werl, denkmalgeschütztes Haus mit Freitreppe, Melsterstraße 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Probleme mit deinen Bildern

Hallo Malchen53, leider gibt es Probleme mit einigen deiner Bilder aus Werl. Konkret geht es um deine Aufnahmen des Hauses Kämperstraße 42, die du irrtümlich als Krämergasse 2 bezeichnet hast. Krämergasse 2 ist jedoch dieses Haus. Vielleicht kannst du die betreffenden Bilder umbenennen lassen, Text und Kategorisierung habe ich bereits korrigiert. Gruß aus dem Tecklenburger Land --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Entschuldigung, da ist mir ein schlimmer Fehler unterlaufen. Danke für Deine Hilfe. Die Bilder habe ich natürlich sofort umbenennen lassen. Liebe Grüße aus Brilon --Malchen53 (talk) 13:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dortmund, DASA, Eingangsbereich.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 22:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, St. Nikolai Kirche, Srahlenkranzmadonna (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jbribeiro1 00:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, St. Nikolai Kirche, Kreuzigungsgruppe.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good quality, but a perspective correction is necessary for QI IMO. Jbribeiro1 00:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)  Comment Imo only horizontal lines should be corrected (it is not an architectural picture) - any idea of the sculptors, would be very interesting for me, thanks --Moroder 06:55, 1 April 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --Malchen53 10:05, 1 April 2014 (UTC) Comment I believe you used a tripod, so why ISO 400 and f/5,6? Good quality. --Moroder 11:28, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, St. Nikolai Kirche, Heiliger mit Zweig.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks.--Malchen53 13:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 15:54, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Werl, denkmalgeschütztes Haus, ehemaliger jüdischer Betraum, Steinerstraße 28. Inschrift über dem Eingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done better now? --Malchen53 13:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Yes, its ok now! --Uoaei1 20:14, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, St. Nikolai Kirche, Heiliger mit blühendem Zweig.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks.--Malchen53 13:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC) Could you brighten the shadows a bit? Mattbuck 21:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)  Done A little bit of it went. --Malchen53 00:12, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Good quality. --Moroder 13:25, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Werl, Skulptur von Joseph Wäscher, der Schweinehirt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:26, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, Briloner Hochfläche, 7 Jahre nach Kyrill (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add English description --Halavar 19:27, 5 April 2014 (UTC)  Done. --Malchen53 20:24, 5 April 2014 (UTC)  Support Great. Good quality --Halavar 20:28, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Werl, denkmalgeschützte Propsteikirche, Pietà an der Außenwand 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done better now. --Malchen53 11:27, 6 April 2014 (UTC) Ok now. QI IMO. --Jbribeiro1 19:03, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kühlungsborn, Denkmal, Vater und Sohn (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:28, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soest, Rathaus, Über dem mittleren Torbogen das Stadtwappen von Soest.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:38, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soest, Wiesenkirche, Westfälisches Abendmahl.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Still oe improvable, but QI overall to me --Poco a poco 19:32, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soest, Rathaus, Westansicht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I start to believe that the barrel distortion was for real because there is some slight cushion distortion now, but overall QI to me --Poco a poco 14:10, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, St. Nikolai Kirche, Heiliger mit Buch und Schlüssel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soest, Rathaus, Mittelteil des Westflügels; im Giebel der Stadtpatron St. Patroklus, darunter ein doppelköpfiger Adler, über dem mittleren Bogen das Soester Stadtwappen..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --SteveK 10:50, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soest, Rathaus, Figur des Gerhard Glotz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --SteveK 10:54, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soest, Rathaus, im Giebel St. Patroklus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --SteveK 10:54, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rüthen Eselgruppe vor dem neuen Rathaus 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:56, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, NSG Drübel, HSK-003 (14).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, NSG Drübel, HSK-003 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 04:53, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, NSG Ammertenbühl, HSK-505 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, Blick auf die Stadt von Süden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can pass as QI IMO. --Cccefalon 04:57, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brilon, Blick auf die Stadt von Süden (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:14, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kühlungsborn Düne mit Ginster.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Graphium 09:25, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Bad Doberan, Münster, Darstellung einer Wilgefortis.JPG

File:Bad Doberan, Münster, Darstellung einer Wilgefortis.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 00:08, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Herzliches Dankeschön für Deine Fotos zum Jahreswechsel

Hallo Malchen53,

Danke für Deinen Beitrag zum Weihnachts-Fotowettbewerb zum Thema Weinachtszeit, Winterzeit, Wendezeit''!

Mit Deiner Hilfe wurden commons um über 1500 Bilder zu Winter- & Weihnachtsthemen bereichert - mit einer großen Motivvielfalt, die von Weihnachtsmärkten und -dekorationen über Weihnachtsmänner, verschneite Landschaften und Schlössern zu typischen Speisen und Getränken reicht.

Wie Du vielleicht unserem Bericht im Kurier schon entnommen hast, haben wir die Community nun zu Abstimmungen in der Endrunde aufgerufen. Zur Wahl stehen die 14 eingereichten Artikel und 100 Bilder, die bis zum 20. Januar durch die Vorrunde und die Einbindung in Artikel ausgewählt wurden. Für die Gewinner, die bis zum 31. Jänner/Januar mit Eurer Hilfe ermittelt werden, stehen durch Unterstützung seitens von WMDE und WMAT insgesamt 12 Bild- und 4 Artikelpreise zur Verfügung. Da in jeder Kategorie – Bild oder Artikel – nur maximal ein Preis pro Teilnehmer möglich ist, sind die Preischancen groß.

Wir freuen uns, wenn Du Zeit findest, dich an der Wahl zu beteiligen. Du hast beliebig viele gereihte Stimmen, wobei erste Stimmen mehr zählen als nachfolgende (zur Reihung setzt Du einfach eine Zahl vor deine Unterschrift).

Um eine genüssliche Betrachtung der Bilder zu ermöglichen, sind die Finalisten nicht nur auf der Abstimmungsseite, sondern auch in einer Galerie zu finden.

Liebe Grüße und viel Spaß beim Bilder und Artikel bewerten!

Anna reg, Dr. Bernd Gross (talk) 08:38, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Werl, Wohnhaus von Wäscher.jpg

File:Werl, Wohnhaus von Wäscher.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:63:AF4A:985C:7822:49EE:F36C:349A 09:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Hermannsborn, der Park (12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark in the shadows, but ok for QI --Hubertl 13:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg, Oberburg, Blick auf Schloss Burg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Hallo Malchen53,

Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.

Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.

Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.

Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Altar Kreuz 1.JPG

And also:

• File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Ambo und Altar.JPG
• File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Blick von der Orgel auf den Altar 1.JPG
• File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche der Altar.JPG
• File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Mutter Gottes im Turm 1.JPG
• File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Mutter Gottes im Turm 2.JPG
• File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Tabernakel 1.JPG
• File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Tabernakel 2.JPG
• File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Taufkapelle hinter dem Altar 1.JPG
• File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Taufkapelle hinter dem Altar 2.JPG
• File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Wandreliefs 1.JPG
• File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Wandreliefs 3.JPG
• File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Wandreliefs 4.JPG
• File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Ölgemälde neben der Altarwand 2.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Soest, St. Patrokli Dom, Blick durch die Krypta auf den Altar.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Mariä Heimsuchung (Werl), Rosenfenster über der Orgel.JPG

File:Mariä Heimsuchung (Werl), Rosenfenster über der Orgel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Altarkreuz 1.JPG

And also:

• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Altarkreuz 3.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Altarkreuz 4.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Altarraum.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Ambo 1.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Blick durch das Kirchenschiff vom Altar aus (2).JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, das Zeltdach innen 1.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, das Zeltdach innen 2.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Harmonium auf der Empore 1.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 1.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 2.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 3.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 4.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 5.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 6.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 7.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 8.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 9.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kreuzgang 1.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kreuzgang 2.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kreuzgang 3.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kreuzgang 4.JPG
• File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Verstärker auf der Empore 2.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 10:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Bad Doberan, Münster, zwei Figuren auf Sockel.JPG

File:Bad Doberan, Münster, zwei Figuren auf Sockel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 20:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC)