User talk:Magnus Manske/Archive 10

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

← Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11 →

et.wikipedia templates for CommonsHelper

I can see that CommonsHelper recognizes some sr.wikipedia templates that were requested earlier. CommonsHelper recognizing following et.wikipedia template associations too would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!

Lubatud → {{Copyrighted free use}}
AO-ise → {{PD-user-w|language=et|project=w|user=uploader's username}}
AO-anonüümne → {{Anonymous-EU}}
AO-lõppenud → {{PD-old}}
AO-autor → {{PD-author}}
AO-sobimatu → {{PD-ineligible}}
AO-US-Keskv → {{PD-USGov}}

--Pikne 17:49, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

... so that images on etwiki with these licenses wouldn't result in "This image has no verificable good license, and can thus not be uploaded to commons through this tool." message. Any chanace? Pikne 09:53, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Way to find files uploades using Flickr2Commons by user

Hello Magnus, I wonder if there is a way to have a list of images uploaded to Commons using Flickr2Commons by a specific user. I mean, something like Special:ListFiles/File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) but with a filter, like uploads requested by me (UAwiki) using Flickr2Commons. Or maybe that would be another of the Magnus' toys ;) Greets and thanks for that useful tool. --UAwiki (talk) 22:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

No real good way I can think of. The upload bot will add a link to that user, so links to that user page will include the once you want, but probably a few more...--Magnus Manske (talk) 21:49, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Firstly, Magnus, great tool, well done in making it available. UAwiki, I simply add my own user category to all uploads with f2c. Someone like User:Fae might be able to run a script which can scour your uploads with f2c and put them into a user category, if that is what you require? russavia (talk) 22:06, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your answers Magnus and Russavia, and I guess I could add those images into a user category, but it's not really necessary at this moment, I was just curious, but thanks for the tip about a script made by Fae and I think Special:WhatLinksHere is good enough for what I'm looking for, I had not thought about that before hehe. Saludos a los dos :) --UAwiki (talk) 04:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

schwerer Bug bei Erstellung von TUSC-Konten

(Sorry - Dein Jira zu benutzen ist mir jetzt zu kompliziert. War mir jetzt auf Anhieb nichtmal Doku auffindbar, welche Anmeldedaten ich da brauche.) (Flickr2Commons hätte ich gerne benutzt. Dazu brauche ich dringend ein TUSC-Konto.) Die Erstellung von TUSC-Konten auf tools.wmflabs.org funktioniert nicht. Wenn ich das Formular ausfülle färbt es mir meinen eingetragenen Benutzernamen rötlich, nachdem ich die Kennwort-Felder ausgefüllt habe. Kein Weiterkommen...--Foerster (talk) 17:20, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

(JIRA ist der offizielle bugtracker des toolservers, SEP) Also, zuert in Commons einloggen wie gehabt; dann hier Benutzernamen und neues Passwort eintragen, Passwort wiederholen. Dann erscheint ein großer blauer Knopf "Edit to activate your account". Draufklicken, die Bearbeitung speichern. Den Commons-Tab schließen. TUSC-Seite sagt jetzt "Account successfully created!". Der rote Benutzername zeigt, dass Du den falsch eingegeben hast. Bitte nochmal versuchen. --Magnus Manske (talk) 18:19, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Genau dieser blaue Knopf erscheint nicht, sondern der eingetragene Nutzername wird rot. Ich habe den Nutzername doppelt und dreifach geprüft und auch mit "User:" davor probiert und sonstige Verzweiflungsmaßnahmen. Ich habe mir auch Hilfe von anderen erfahrenen Nutzern erfragt und diese(r) kam zum selben Ergebnis: Software-Fehler.--Foerster (talk) 18:30, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Oh, Du brauchst 'ne Benutzerseite hier! --Magnus Manske (talk) 18:37, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Soll heißen - irgendwelchen Text auf der Seite? Damit das Werkzeug keine Neuanlage von Seiten vollführen muss? Warum nimmt es nicht die Diskussionsseite - so wie früher? Seltsam. Aber zumindest ein hilfreicher Hinweis wäre prima für die da nach mir kommen... Dankeschön.--Foerster (talk) 18:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Credited uploaders in a list?

Greetings, Magnus Manske. User:Farhikht uploaded several images (e.g.) using your bot, and your bot duly credited him. But since he never edited the image, it doesn't show up in his contributions. Is there any automated way to get a list of all the files uploaded (with FUB) by a particular user? – Quadell (talk) 17:59, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

There is, but only with direct database access or excessive API usage, and only if the user link was not removed. Look at all the pages from file namespace that link to the user page. A direct database query gives:

File:Javad_alizadeh.jpg, File:Javad_alizadeh_surreal-Surreal_suicide.jpg, File:Javad_alizadeh_divorce-child.jpg, File:Javad_alizadeh_hedayat-iranian-black-novelist.jpg, File:Signature_of_javad_alizadeh.JPG, File:Javad_alizadeh_-penetrating-pen.jpg, File:Javad_alizadeh_ocean-of-sorrow-.jpg --Magnus Manske (talk) 21:57, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

That'll do, thanks. – Quadell (talk) 11:30, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Léglise (5475793232).jpg

File:Léglise (5475793232).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Myrabella (talk) 22:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Origoventus.jpg

File:Origoventus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rapsar (talk) 16:12, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Add information tool forces insecure http protocol

Hi Magnus. A favour to ask. When the "add information tool" is used now, whether it be used from http or https connection, since it has moved to wmflabs, it now forces an http processing; even seems that way when run directly at labs. Would it be possible to have the tool running in the "arriving" protocol rather than forced to an insecure login (or not logged in) for those of operating in https?

Also the tool at Commons pushes to https://toolserver.org/~magnus/add_information.php?image=Plant_material_at_pharmacopoeia_market_in_Guangzhou.jpg should this be updated within the gadget to the new url?

Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:34, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Otis (02-09-08).JPG

File:Otis (02-09-08).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

CommonsHelper und TUSC

Hallo Magnus, du hast mir weiter oben den CommonsHelper zum Verschieben von de nach commons empfohlen. Der verlangt aber ein TUSC-passwort. Wo bekomme ich das her? bzw. gibt es noch eine Alternative für meine fünf Verschiebungen. (Im Moment geht es mir um de:Datei:Gedenktafel Robert Oettel in Görlitz.jpg) Gruß, --PigeonIP (talk) 08:53, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Siehe de:WP:TUSC. --Leyo 20:27, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Question

Did you take the pictures of those Borussia players yourself or do you know a website that have pictures of the players in public domain? --TheShadowCrow (talk) 02:53, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

I did not take any pictures of Borussia players. Please check if they were not merely uploaded using my tool, in which case I have noting else to do with them. --Magnus Manske (talk) 14:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Transfered from Flickr. to Wikimedia

Hallo Magnus Manske, bereits schon einmal im Dezember 2012 hatte ich um Transferierung der Bilder von Aschaffenburg in Wikimedia gebeten. Es hat mir sehr geholfen, dafür nochmals herzlichen Dank. Darf ich nochmals bitten:

Flickr. 2011-03-26 Aschaffenburg von Allie Caulfield

das sind super Detailfotos Stiftskirche und Schlosskapelle, auch nochmals aus der Staatsgalerie.

Ich würde mich freuen und bedanke mich recht herzlich. Liebe Grüße--Ekpah (talk) 12:06, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Ekpah, alle erledigt (z.B. hier). Nächstes Mal gern auch ein Link auf das Flickr-Set, damit ich es nicht erst suchen muss ;-) --Magnus Manske (talk) 13:02, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Magnus Manske, Tausend Dank, ich sortiere später schon ein. Heute Abend werde ich ein Glas Sekt öffnen (Originalzitat Edmund Stoiber) und auf Dein Wohl in einem Zug leeren. DANKE --Ekpah (talk) 13:51, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Lyon - Gare de Lyon-Saint-Exupéry TGV (7473865898).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 07:04, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Feld „Anmerkungen“ fällt beim Dateitransfer untern Tisch

Hallo Magnus, bei File:Alte Graefte.jpg und besonders bei File:Idylle am Fluss.jpg (Urheber ist nicht mehr aktiv) habe ich beim Kategorisieren das Problem, sie geographisch zuzuordnen. Gibt es beim CommonsHelper vielleicht einen Schalter, mit dem man die „Anmerkungen“ an die “Description” anhängen kann? Wenn ja, ist der wohl schlecht dokumentiert (bei den Transfers durch User:Wdwd fallen die Anmerkungen jedenfalls untern Tisch). -- Olaf Studt (talk) 08:55, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Peggynash.PNG

File:Peggynash.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Asclepias (talk) 04:34, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Changing a pic on wikimedia commons

I know you probably didn't upload this pic: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Burning_Man_2012_(7941237278).jpg , but I was wondering what is the best way to identify the guy in it. It is John Styn.

The Description says "John Styn", and Source has a link to the original image, and Author has a link to the guy who took the image. A Google search for John Styn and Burning Man yields this. Looks legit. --Magnus Manske (talk) 14:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

GLAMorous

Könntest du das Tool bitte auf dem Toolserver wieder aktivieren, bis es auf Labs funktioniert? Oder mache ich irgendwas falsch? --Ralf Roleček 22:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Eine genauere Fehlerbeschreibung (oder wenigstens eine Fehlerbeschreibung) könnte hilfreich sein... --Magnus Manske (talk) 14:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Es scheint irgendwie mitn meinem Benutzernamen zusammenzuhängen: Commons:Forum#Glamorous. Könntest du dir das mal bitte ansehen? --Ralf Roleček 12:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

geograph_org2commons

Hi Magnus, has geograph_org2commons died, or has it moved? Cnbrb (talk) 11:35, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Someone on Labs broke it by removing my code. Investigating. --Magnus Manske (talk) 15:09, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

OK Thanks - good luck with that! Cnbrb (talk) 13:16, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Überkategorisierung

Hi, dein Bot ist zwar episch, aber weil er routinemäßig alle Kategorietags von Flicker übernimmt, neigt er zu extremen Über(und Fehl)kategorisierungen. Flickr hat im Gegensatz zu Commons kein hierarchisches Kategoriesystem, bzw es wird nicht als solches benutzt, sondern umBilder zu promoten nach dem Prinzip "viel hilft viel". Auf Commons verursacht eine einfache Übernahme aller Flickr-Kategorien exzessive viel Wartungsarbeit. Ein gutes Beispiel wäre dieses - 6 Tags, von denen 5 falsch sind und manuell entfernt werden müssen.

Wäre es möglich, das zu ändern? Spontan würde mir eine einfache (aber krude) und eine schwierige (aber elegante) Methode einfallen:

Ohne Nutzerintervention werden nur maximal 2 Kategorien von Flickr übernommen. Relativ egal, welche; gegebenenfalls noch mit catreview taggen.
Von allen Kategorien, die auf Commons in einer Hierarchie stehen (wenn der Bot das ermitteln kann), werden nur die jeweils niedrigsten (spezifischsten) übernommen.

Wenn ich wählen müßte, würde ich die erste Methode bevorzugen - beide sind fehlerbehaftet, und die zweite ist aufwändiger umzusetzen.

Zusätzliche Kategorien können dann von Nutzern ad libitum eingestellt werden. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 05:13, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Problems with Geograph-to-Commons tool

I am trying out the new Geograph-to-Commons tool: http://tools.wmflabs.org/geograph2commons/

For some photos, it doesn't work. It seems to be photos without a high resolution version, ie only available in 640x480 or less. For these, it just uploads the Geograph "Sorry, image not available" image. Example File:Spey at Spey Bridge (geograph 2065352).jpg. Or older version here (I fixed this by manually uploading the correct photo): File:The Old Spey Bridge (geograph 1870340).jpg

It seems to be working fine with higher resolution images. Thanks. --Vclaw (talk) 21:48, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Sum-it-up and WhatIsThat?

Hi Magnus, thanks for porting Sum-it-up and WhatIsThat? to the new server. I opened a few conversations at Commons:Village pump related to the tools. Best! --Codrin.B (talk) 08:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorting by language code in WhatIsThat?

Hi Magnus. I see the new WhatIsThat tool doesn't sort by language code as I believe is used to do. See an example here. It would be very useful to have the languages sorted, so the descriptions could be easily added to an image, without massaging. Thanks.--Codrin.B (talk) 08:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Speed of WhatIsThat?

I remember that the DieBuche's version of WhatIsThat? got some speed improvements when it was forked(?). I saw a conversation somewhere but can't find it at the moment. But during my usage of both tools, I noticed that his version is faster. For example WLANL - koopmanrob - Helm.jpg with DieBuche's WhatIsThat? vs WLANL - koopmanrob - Helm.jpg with WFMLabs' WhatIsThat?. However, DieBuche's version doesn't return all descriptions many times. For example: Elephant safari.jpg with DieBuche's WhatIsThat? vs Elephant safari.jpg with WFMLabs' WhatIsThat? So what I am trying to ask is - can the speed improvements done by DieBuche be ported to the WMFLabs' version of WhatIsThat?, effectively merging the two? I don't see the need for forks.--Codrin.B (talk) 09:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Bug with Original upload date

Why is the date given as |Datum = 1879-12-31 considered as {{Original upload date|1879-12-31}}? The file was originally uploaded to de.wikipedia in June 2011. --Leyo 09:08, 21 September 2012

This bug, which falsifies facts, is always occurring if the date in the source project is given in YYYY-MM-DD (another example). --Leyo 10:33, 14 January 2013

Should be fixed now, but I couldn't find an example to it test on. --Magnus Manske (talk) 08:04, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. As I have already stated on your de-WP talk page, all test moved I made were successful. The most recent is File:Edelkastanie in Buchbach 2011-04.jpg. --Leyo 21:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Persönlichkeitsrechte

Hallo Magnus, ich bin gerade am Abarbeiten (Kategorisieren) von Flickr Streams des österreichischen Außenministeriums. Dabei ist mir aufgefallen, dass in solchen Kategorien, wo hauptsächlich Personen vorkommen. Wäre es nicht vielleicht möglich bzw. hilfreich, wenn man da beim Import gleich den Baustein für Persönlichkeitsrechte mit reinsetzt. --gruß K@rl (talk) 09:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Eine Alternative wäre eine Anfrage unter COM:BWR. Die Bausteine fehlen in Tausenden von Dateibeschreibungsseiten. --Leyo 03:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Bot flag

Please mark "File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske)" as a bot, so that its edits can be ignored from watchlists with the "Hide bots" option. Bomazi (talk) 15:24, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

I can't; literally, the software does not allow me to change the flag. Maybe just request it on Commons:Bots/Requests? I think it was listed there before, but not flagged as bot because it never does things unsupervised; all its actions are one-to-one just a "placeholder" for human action. Note that some tools may break when the bot flag is set, and I'll have to go around fix them. --Magnus Manske (talk) 21:55, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

aerial view of Monreale cloister

Hello.

Could I please ask permission to use your aerial photograph of the Monreale cloister in my book on Norman Sicily? It gives an excellent over-all view which is impossible to provide with words alone, and I like that it shows the mini-cloister in the corner.

Thank you very much. Nancy

Hi Nancy, I have never taken such a picture, even if you had bothered to tell me which one you talk about (URL, file name?). Please check the image description page and look for "Author". That said, if the picture is here on Commons, it means you can freely use it under the conditions of the given license, also to be found on the image description page; you do not require additional permission. --Magnus Manske (talk) 21:35, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Commons Commander

Hi Magnus, ist es so babsichtigt, daß https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Commander nicht mehr funktioniert? Ich habe schon mit https://toolserver.org/~magnus/commcomm/ gearbeitet aber das andere "gefällt" mir irgendwie besser. Wenn ich eine Cat. eingebe und "show category" klicke, kommt unten das rote Loading... und nichts passiert (probiert mit der Cat. "Quality images by Ralf Roletschek/Schweden". In der cat. sind nur 2 Bilder, di menge kann es nicht sein. Und wenn ich es dann irgendwie schaffe, eine Cat. zu aktivieren, werden keine Thumbs angezeigt. Ich finde auch keinen Weg, Bilder von links nach rechts zu verschieben oder zu kopieren? Sicher alles nur user-zu-blöd-error, sorry für die Störung! --Ralf Roleček 18:02, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

War ein Problem mit https, sollte jetzt wieder funktionieren. --Magnus Manske (talk) 21:40, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Storyofmenstruationtitle.jpg

File:Storyofmenstruationtitle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

TJRC (talk) 20:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Story of menstruation 2.jpg

File:Story of menstruation 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

TJRC (talk) 20:57, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Emily Büning.jpg

File:Emily Büning.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Something wrong with your bot

I tried uploading images from flickr and i kept getting the same error: Transfer failed : 500 Internal Server Error

The Files are aptly licenced its just your bot refuses to upload them, uploading 36 MANUALLY is time consuming, can you figure out whats wrong?...it looks like to me the links are broken, i.e the first image links to http://www.flickr.com/photos/undefined/10242932244 instead of http://www.flickr.com/photos/fearless_fred/10242932244.....please fix it....there is no alternate for "mass upload from flickr"...--Stemoc (talk) 03:45, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Flickr-to-Commons simply does not work anymore. It's a pitty and unfortunately I can't find the old version, which functioned well for my purpouses. Can you do something about it? Please! Uleli (talk) 14:44, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

File Upload Bot is not adding EXIF data

Hello, I came to report that File Upload Bot is not adding EXIF data to the images anymore, maybe is something recent, I remember it used to add it before. For example, in File:Theatre of Tragedy.jpg I had to reupload the image to get EXIF data, and in some other files inside its category. I hope you can check that please. Thank you. --UAwiki (talk) 18:15, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Pyramides (3334293905).jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 22:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Categorización de imágenes de un album

Hola: Perdón por no saber alemán o inglés. Soy muy novato a pesar de ser muy viejo en la vida. He subido imágenes de Flicker a Commons con tu Bot y no sé si tengo que categorizarlas todas, una a una, o hay otra manera de hacerlo todo de una vez pues todas son del mismo evento. Muchas gracias por tu atención.--Adolfobrigido (talk) 21:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Hola Adolfobrigido, yo no hablo español, así que voy a tener que depender de la traducción automática. En la herramienta, puede agregar categorías o modelos para todos los archivos que transfiere. Esto se hace en la parte superior. Además, puede especificar las categorías por archivo, en el campo correspondiente al lado de la imagen. Además, se pueden añadir categorías de forma automática cuando sea posible, a menos que desactive esa opción. Una vez que los archivos se transfieren a Wikimedia Commons, usted tendrá que agregar categorías para cada archivo por separado. Hay un dispositivo llamado "HotCat" en las preferencias de usuario para hacer esto más fácil. --Magnus Manske (talk) 14:50, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Category: Macroglossum stellatarum

A number of images were uploaded by this bot to category:Macroglossum stellatarum by mistake. The hummingbird moths of North America belong to the genus Hemaris. They are too many to move them one by one. The so called hummingbird hawkmoth of Europe, Asia and Africa is Macroglossum stellatarum. But the hummingbird moth of North America is a different species in a different genus.--Polinizador (talk) 14:41, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

I just realized that, not only the category but the names of the images are incorrect. This needs to be taken care of soon, please. I repeat, all the hummingbird moths from the US are Hemaris. --173.49.218.39 21:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Hugginglecbuddha.jpg

File:Hugginglecbuddha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Ipoellet (talk) f.k.a. Werewombat 03:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Cropbot problem

Hi! If am not mistaken, you are a toolserver user. Maybe you can help us in a problem related to Cropbot. Please check the discussion at User_talk:Luxo#Cropbot_problem. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:59, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Wikimemnoniamap.JPG

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 14:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Blenheim Palace IMG 3687.JPG

Hi Magnus, would it be possible for you to upload a cropped, blown-up version of this picture with the old tree (with the round hole) in the middle? I would like to have it for my collection of Harry Potter film locations. Your's is the only photo of Blenheim with this particular tree --Judithcomm (talk) 21:12, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

What's the problem with cropping it yourself? It's under a free license, you know ;-) --Magnus Manske (talk) 11:24, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Two problems: 1. I tried cropping, but the resulting picture was very vague. So I thought, maybe you have a higher resolution original to work with. 2. I wasn't sure how to document the license: who would be 'author', for instance, you or me? But the first reason is the most important --Judithcomm (talk) 14:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Did it anyway. See http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Snape-tree-Blenheim_Palace_IMG_3687.jpg. Please correct the license info if you disagree --Judithcomm (talk) 21:04, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Les bancs verts (4166150246).jpg

File:Les bancs verts (4166150246).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

67.87.46.39 02:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Mattweiner.jpg

File:Mattweiner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

CennoxX (talk) 15:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Kanakprabhaji.jpg

File:Kanakprabhaji.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 00:41, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

File:CarlosBianchi.jpg

File:CarlosBianchi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fma12 (talk) 19:41, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

File:EnzoTrossero.jpg

File:EnzoTrossero.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fma12 (talk) 03:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Image of a status

Your bot uploaded the File:Ba anh em nhà họ Nhạc.JPG. So, it's fine to upload of picture taken of a statue from a public place. There is a Hung king worship place in Pleiku, where there are statues of 18 Hung kings. Could you upload them or ask anyone else to do so? ༆ (talk) 05:25, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Please ask the original uploader (see "author") instead. --Magnus Manske (talk) 13:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

	Happy Holidays!
	G'day, just a quick greeting wishing you and your family happy holidays and all the best for 2014. And of course, a big thank you for putting a leg up by doing what you do on Commons, and helping to make it the fantastic project that it is. Greetings from a warm west coast of Aussie. russavia (talk) 01:42, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Russavia! --Magnus Manske (talk) 13:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Boston Bruins Bilder

Hallo. Danke sehr für Deine uploads - Boston Bruins players. Aber bitte sehr nächstes Mal, schaffe neu Unterkategorie für die änlichen Bilder. Ich habe solche jetzt gemacht und zwar Category:Boston Bruins practice (January 5, 2011) und Category:Boston Bruins practice (December 26, 2010). Es ist nicht nötig, so viele Kategorien zu geben wie "Ice hockey", "Boston Bruins", "Boston Bruins players" und anderen. Es is richtig die eine machen und alle derartigen Photos dort zu stellen. MfG Lowdown (talk) 10:16, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Lowdown, bitte lies mal die fett, rot umrahmte Box oben auf dieser Seite. Dann guck mal eins der Bilder an, und guck unter "Source" oder dem Hochlade-Kommentar. --Magnus Manske (talk) 14:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Something wrong with your bot

It hasn't been working for 3 days now, the error i get is

"Transfer failed : API Error... Code: unknown_assert Text: Unrecognized value for parameter 'assert': API Error... Code: unknown_assert Text: Unrecognized value for parameter 'assert': Upload error... "

Its the only bot available to upload massive amount of images from flickr, please fix it soon..--Stemoc (talk) 07:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Wrote a new upload function, should work now. --Magnus Manske (talk) 15:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

yeah i tried uploading a set (72157629986782632), even made a category] for it.... got the green light, but when i went to check, nothing was actually uploaded..looks like both the flickr bots just don't like me.....I'm done with his..--Stemoc (talk) 01:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

File:UniCredit tower building, Milan, Italy (9474144390).jpg

File:UniCredit tower building, Milan, Italy (9474144390).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

151.67.222.253 22:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

faq concerning http://tools.wmflabs.org/glamtools/glamorous.php

Hi Magnus, when I first read about your new tool in summer I was very pleased. I figured it would become so easy for me to show the impact of collaboration with Wikimedia Commons to hesitating GLAM institutions. A few months later: I have tried different ways in order to find out how the tool works. But as I tried the tool I wonder if it would be helpful to add an FAQ to the tool. For instance, why does the tool not show the usage of images within the category of a certain institution even though I know that the images were used. Example: images from Deutsches Luft und Raumfahrtzentrum (DLR) & https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AlSat.jpg being used here: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disaster_Monitoring_Constellation. How do I have to enter the category in order to get good results? An other example: I entered "Deutsches Archäologisches Institut" (DAI), one of our GLAM partners, and got an amazing output, but many of the records shown do not derive from the DAI. Example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Johann_Jacob_Bachofen.jpg . I am sure that with some instruction it would be easier to use the tool. Or am I simply to blind to find the instructions? thanks for Your advice--Barbara Fischer (WMDE) (talk) 14:09, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

CommonsHelper Upload

Hi Magnus, kann es sein, dass in den letzten Tagen der Upload (Filetransfer) von de.wp nach commons via Commonshelper nicht funktioniert? Der Transfer wird in der Antwort (web-interface) vom commonshelper als erfolgreich durchgeführt angezeigt, allerdings kommen auf commons keine Dateien an. Die Aktivitätsliste vom Bot weist, abseits Transfers von flickr, keine Transfers von de.wikipedia auf. Klemmt da vielleicht irgendwas?--Wdwd (talk) 20:50, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Bitte das Bild löschen http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ska_Keller.jpg

Hi Magnus, kannst du bitte das Bild löschen? Wir haben das Foto bei Flickr unter der falschen Lizenz hochgeladen. Bei Flickr habe ich die Lizenz jetzt auch geändert. Danke. Viele Grüße, Tim www.gruene.de

An sich kann man die Lizenz nicht im Nachhinein ändern, das ist wie ein Vertrag, den man unterschreibt. Ich hab's trotzdem mal zur Löschung vorgeschlagen. Allerdings wird das Bild auf vielen Wikipedias (auch auf der deutschen) in Ska's Artikel verwendet. Die einzige Alternative ist im Moment dieses Bild. Vielleicht findet ihr ja noch ein besseres Bild, dass ihr unter freier Lizenz rausgeben könnt (und dann auch so lasst!)? --Magnus Manske (talk) 23:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

File upload bot and catwegories

Hey Magnus. The File Upload bot sometimes adds wrong categories eg File:China 50 Cash, first half 19th c. (3543703236).jpg. It was in categories such as Category:Commons, Category:Home, Category:Wikipedia etc. Can the bot be set up to strip certain categories? Alan Liefting (talk) 20:32, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

That is an option that can be set by the user operating the bot. --Magnus Manske (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Fehlfunktion des Uploadbots?

Warum wird der Abschnitt Informationen zerschossen, da dort {{==Lizenzen== }} eingefügt wird? Da das bei Bildern verschiedener ursprünglicher Hochlader zu beobachten ist: ist das eine Fehlfunktion oder ein Benutzungsfehler? Arbeitsbeschaffung für Admins, die auf :de das Löschen von Now Commons-Dateien nicht mit der linken Hand erledigen? --Enzian44 (talk) 00:46, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Beispiel?--Magnus Manske (talk) 11:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

geohack

Hi Magnus, I see you migrated the geohack tools to tool-labs. In there, there is also a region.php, which I need for the migrated locator-tool ( http://tools.wmflabs.org/locator/coordinates.php ) to automatically set region. Dispenser helped me with that one, and on toolserver I used ~para/region.php. I call it with the variable tsv. The version on tool labs in the geohack-dir doesn't seem to work, is that something that you can look into to get working? Akoopal (talk) 22:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

AFAIK, the ~para/region.php would be the one to use (not sure if the "local" one is identical), but it depends on a database, of which I do not have a copy. --Magnus Manske (talk) 17:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

That is indeed the one I used on toolserver. Unfortunately probably some security restrictions prevent me from calling it from tool labs. Akoopal (talk) 17:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Magnus Manske/Archive 10, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Erwin's tools.

Hi Magnus, I see you also migrated some of Erwin's tools. Would you be willing to also look into related changes? It is one I used a lot to keep an eye on changes in the category of the articles I am interested in. Akoopal (talk) 22:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

User_talk:FlickreviewR/bad-authors#Slight_change_in_format

Please have a look here, I don't want to change the format as it may break the other tools/Bots. Your Flickr2Commons tool may be affected by the requested change. --Denniss (talk) 23:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Terminator

Another request related to the terminator tool.

Would it be possible to get a "Top X linked properties with missing labels in ..."? They are of coure a lot fewer of them than the items but on the other hand getting them translated is more important.

Cheers, Lokal _Profil 15:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

i would like to upload an image for the on and i only wish you the best of luck in your line of work

Category:Friedrich Fleischmann

Hi, An image that you transferred to Commons File:Friedrich Fleischmann.jpg is of the composer and is incorrectly being used to illustrate the infobox of the engraver. Could you replace it with File:Friedrich Fleischmann02.jpg which is a self-portrait of the engraver. Thank you Paul venter (talk) 14:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Baglama addition

Hi Magnus. Just wondering if you could add Category:Images from the Nationalmuseum Stockholm to the Baglama tool. It doesn't have that many images right now but the museum staff need the stats to sell the idea of larger uploads in the future to their higher-ups. Also unsure If you wanted the request here or on Jira since its technically no longer a toolserver tool.

Cheers /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 16:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Added. January data in a few days, I hope. --Magnus Manske (talk) 10:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Could Images from the National Library of Sweden also be added? They were excited about having one of their images become featured and are interested in seeing how this translates into views. Cheers /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 10:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Done. January job still running, probably into March :-( --Magnus Manske (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Couldn't find it (National Library of Sweden) in the list though.No worries about the January data, the wheels move slowly within the institutions anyways ;) /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 13:46, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

CommonsHelper

Gday MM. Not sure exactly where issues for your migrated tools should be reported. When submitting a file to transfer with CommonsHelper today, I get me the error Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Exception' with message 'Problem with http://tools-webserver-01/tusc/tusc.php' in /data/project/magnustools/public_html/php/common.php:198 Stack trace: #0 /data/project/magnustools/public_html/php/common.php(219): do_post_request('http://tools-we...', Array) #1 /data/project/commonshelper/public_html/index.php(1225): verify_tusc() #2 {main} thrown in /data/project/magnustools/public_html/php/common.php on line 198 . I was trying to move w:File:Battle of Hampton Roads poem image.png under my name and TUSC. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:04, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Something wrong with your bot again

Stopped working 6 days ago..now on OAuth it seems and yet even when authorised, it doesn't upload anything, keep getting "Transfer failed : 200 OK" error..--Stemoc (talk) 00:51, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Test image 2014-03-06.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Test image 2014-03-06.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:CUBG fountain.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:CUBG fountain.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 13:19, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Cacti and sky (4811425723).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Cacti and sky (4811425723).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 12:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:CUBG landscape.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:CUBG landscape.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 12:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Red leaves 2.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Red leaves 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 13:12, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

flickr2commons & sequential file renaming

Hi,

I've just tried to use flickr2commons to upload a big set of photos. I can't do so, because all the files are named in series with "_DSC9641", which is obviously not acceptable to Commons. Please will you consider adding a sequential numbering option, so I can name the first file Foobar 01.jpg, and have the next automatically uploaded as Foobar 02.jpg, then Foobar 03.jpg and so on; like Commons' own upload wizard? cheers, Andy Mabbett (talk) 18:25, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

You can click on "prefix selected names". That will keep the _DSC, but put the same string in front of each. That should bypass the Commons name filter, keep the original file name in there, and still add a "group" name. --Magnus Manske (talk) 18:29, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you; that's a work-around, but I prefer to name files in series, like File:View from One Euston Square - 11 December 2013 - 07.JPG.

Flickr2commons null issue

I'm one of those affected by "transfer failed [1: null"] message. I've tried different browsers, caching, revoking OAuth; none of these seems to matter. The last time it failed I captured detailed HTTP headers from the failure. Would those be useful in debugging? I don't want to post them publicly because of the token secret but I could email them (or if the tokens don't matter I can just remove those parts). Best, Mackensen (talk) 00:07, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, but that would just be the headers for the call to my upload tool, which works AFAICT; it's the subsequent upload by that tool that barfs. Thanks anyway. --Magnus Manske (talk) 11:00, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Diskussion auf dem Village pump

Hallo, wieder einmal ich: schau bitte einmal auf Commons:Village_pump#OAuth_Flickr2Commons_Flickrreview_tags. darkweasel94 20:14, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

CC-4.0 Lizenzen und CommonsHelper

Hi Magnus, nachdem das von mir angelegte Ticket MAGNUS-400 im JIRA-system leider derzeit mit System-Error und einen Stack-Trace abstürzt: Wäre es möglich die neuen CC-4.0 Lizenz im CommonsHelper mit zu unterstützen? Konkret wäre von de.wp nach commons folgende zusätzliche Lizenzen:

New cc4.0 License templates from de.wp to commons:

de.wp: {{Bild-CC-by/4.0}} to commons: {{Cc-by-4.0}}
de.wp: {{Bild-CC-by-sa/4.0}} to commons: {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}

Mit Dank,--Wdwd (talk) 09:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Sollte erledigt sein. --Magnus Manske (talk) 14:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Danke, funkt.--Wdwd (talk) 18:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Wenn du schonmal dabei bist, bitte repariere die Handhabung von der deutschen Vorlage {{Bild-GFDL-Neu}}, die wird momentan kopiert und ein weiterer GFDL-user-de Baustein gesetzt. Mein Vorschlag wäre das wegfallen der gfdl-neu hier und das hinzugügen von migration=not-eligible als Parameter beim gfdl-user-de. Siehe File:Plattenspieler Top View Tonarm 2.jpg als Testlauf. --Denniss (talk)

Weiterer Fehler: innerhalb von gallery-tags wird der lokale Dateiprefix (z.B. Datei:) beibehalten anstatt auf File: geändert zu werden: Beispiel. Dies scheint alle lokalen Varianten zu betreffen. --Denniss (talk) 19:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Und ein kosmetischer Fehler, der aber weitere Bot-durchläufe zur Behebung braucht: CommonsHelper benutzt int:license anstatt int:license-header --Denniss (talk) 06:57, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Könntest du bitte zumindest {{int:license}} → {{int:license-header}} zeitnah umsetzen? Das würde Hunderte bis Tausende von Botedits einsparen und ist einfach umzusetzen. --Leyo 20:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

int:license erledigt. --Magnus Manske (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Danke! --Leyo 22:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Commons Commander

Hi magnus, funktioniert der nicht mehr oder stelle ich mich nur zu doof an? [1] startet zwar, es werden aber keine Kategorien angezeigt. Und hier wird gemeldet, daß die Spezialseite nicht vorhanden ist. Das kam immer mal vor aber ein paar mal Neuladen hat sonst immer geholfen. mache ich was falsch? Gibts eine Alternative? --Ralf Roleček 18:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Die Toolserver-Variante ist kaputt. Für die Spezialseite musst Du die Zeile

importScript('MediaWiki:Commander.js');

in Deine common.js eintragen. Habe es selber lange nicht mehr probiert, sag Bescheid, ob's noch funktioniert ;-) --Magnus Manske (talk) 19:19, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Danke! Es funktioniert. Zwar mit einigen Tagen Verzögerung aber wer weiß, was da noch aus dem Cache gescheucht werden mußte ;) --Ralf Roleček 08:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

OMG, screaming, horror, panic

I see that you've decided to do away with TUSC for your tool. Well, er, User:OgreBot still uses TUSC. Are you ever sunsetting TUSC?

(Strangely enough, I was able to code around the upload problems in Peachy pretty easily)

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:23, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

I'll keep TUSC running, some of my tools still use it too. If I ever turn it off, I'll check the logs first to ensure no one is using anymore. --Magnus Manske (talk) 20:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

CommonsHelper-Verbesserung

Hallo, der CommonsHelper funktioniert momentan mit OAuth besser denn je. Allerding sind mir noch zwei kleinere Probleme aufgefallen. Der NowCommons-Baustein lässt sich nicht automatisch setzen, der Link erzeugt nur einen leeren neuen Abschnitt (eigentlich aber kein neues Problem). Ausserdem wäre wieder ein Link zur neu hochgeladenen Datei hilfreich, damit würden sich einige Klicks einsparen lassen. --Didym (talk) 21:59, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Magnus, auch von mir vielen Dank – die OAuth-Unterstützung ist super! :-) Den Link zur Datei auf Commons fände ich auch sehr praktisch. --ireas (talk) 22:51, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Link eingebaut. Der NowCommons-Button funktioniert für mich, siehe diesen edit. Gibt's ein Beispiel, wo der button nicht funktioniert (möglichst mit Originaldatei noch vorhanden)? --Magnus Manske (talk) 20:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Some suggestions for f2c

hey mate, i am a heavy user of f2c and regular upload streams consisting of thousands of images, Category:Files from Korea.net Flickr stream being one of my most recent examples. Some issues I've come across in my time that I hope you can come up with fixes for.

If the file name consists of / | # the upload fails. You can use this small set as an example to try out. Is there some way that if a file has one of these characters in it, it can automatically be replaced with, say, a comma (-)? I have some extremely large streams to upload of highly valued photos, but using f2c would be impossible due to this issue.
If the file name has double spaces in it, this also fails. Is there some way of eliminating double spaces?

If you could let me know, that would be great, and I'll get other minor issues to you as well. Cheers, russavia (talk) 22:39, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

You can use JavaScript to do this. After loading the files into F2C, open your browser's JavaScript console and let it evaluate the following:

var list = document.getElementsByClassName("newtitle"); for(var i=0;i<list.length;i++) { list[i].value=list[i].value.replace(/\|/g, "-"); }

This replaced all "|" with "-" in your example set for me. Of course that shouldn't prevent Magnus Manske from implementing an automatic solution, but it does work. darkweasel94 22:57, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Update after an IRC conversation with russavia: For replacing / and | and # with -, you can bookmark this URL:

javascript:(function(){var%20list%20=%20document.getElementsByClassName("newtitle");%20for(var%20i=0;i<list.length;i++)%20{%20list[i].value=list[i].value.replace(/[\|/#]/g,%20"-");%20}})();

Click on that bookmark and the filenames will change. darkweasel94 23:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Fixed in the tool now. --Magnus Manske (talk) 22:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Another symbol I see often and which also fails is : can we get that fixed too if poss. Cheers, russavia (talk) 07:46, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

I recently had to do that as well, and used the following JS in the JS console to do that (it replaces : with ,).

var list=document.getElementsByClassName("newtitle");for(var i=0;i<list.length;i++){list[i].value=list[i].value.replace(/:/g,",");}

As an explanation for non-programmers, these things always start with (you can copy this verbatim, you don't need to understand it):

var list=document.getElementsByClassName("newtitle");for(var i=0;i<list.length;i++){list[i].value=

They are then followed by what you want each filename to be. Something starting with list[i].value.replace( means: the original filename (list[i].value), where something is replaced. It is followed by a regular expression (i.e. a search term) enclosed in / and /g, a comma, and the string that the search term should be replaced with enclosed in quotation marks. Then you have );} (if you didn't use .replace(, and nothing else with an opening bracket, you have only ;}).

To build a regular expression, mostly you can simply write the search term, but behind the above link you'll find more complex constructs like the [\|/#] (which means: match | or / or #) I used above. Note how "|" needs to be escaped with a preceding backslash as a special character; that, too, is explained behind the link.

To make a bookmarklet from that, in my understanding you simply enclose your code in javascript:(function(){ and })();; a good browser (Firefox does it) should automatically replace the spaces in your code with %20 as needed in URLs. Hope this helps some people use F2C with more flexibility. darkweasel94 08:21, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Added ":" to the list. --Magnus Manske (talk) 13:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Suggestion for wdfist-tool

Hi. Just a small suggestion for wdfist. It would be useful if P41 (flag image) could be added as one of the available "add as..." options. Largely fills the same function as the existing logo option but for organisations/countries with flags instead. /Lokal _Profil 10:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Done. --Magnus Manske (talk) 20:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks. /Lokal _Profil 10:36, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Some red thing (8237300129).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Some red thing (8237300129).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 12:16, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:House in Lüneburg (4838105025).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:House in Lüneburg (4838105025).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 13:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Flickr2commons suggestion

I assume it was Flickr2commons used to upload File:Palace of the Grand Master of the Knights of Rhodes (9451902405).jpg. I'm working through hundreds of manual Flickr reviews and find lots of images with this somewhat useless "Transferred from Flickr" message. Please change the message to something more informative like "Transferred from Flickr via Flickr2commons" or "Transferred from Flickr via Flickr2commons from (insert Flickr link here)". This would help manual reviewers a lot since the images had already been checked vs license and blacklist so no need for us to check them again.--Denniss (talk) 09:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

That isn't a reliable way to check if Flickr2Commons or anything else was used. Using the API, you can upload files with any edit summary you like, including one that says it was transferred using Flickr2Commons even if it wasn't. Just saying. A reliable way to check that is to look in the upload log where you'll have a tag "OAuth Uploader". I don't oppose the suggestion, just don't see how it would be of much use. darkweasel94 09:19, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

I have changed the message to "Transferred from Flickr via Flickr2commons". I can't prevent others from uploading with the same comment, but at least all uploads via my tool will have this now. Other edits via OAuth have the tool/version as a tag (example), but uploads don't show this (yet). --Magnus Manske (talk) 17:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

int:filedesc

Hi. Why don't Commonshelper and Flickr2commons add == {{int:filedesc}} == in the top of the page? --Sporti (talk) 06:21, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

usualsuspects tool at Labs

Seems to be broken, at least the web interface doesn't work anymore. --Denniss (talk) 10:52, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Fixed. --Magnus Manske (talk) 15:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

TUSC is down

Hello. TUSC is down right now: [2]. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:46, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Restarted. --Magnus Manske (talk) 19:01, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

problemes amb la carrega

Hola sóc la Edithsme i col•laboro amb vosaltres traient les marques d'aigua. Tinc un problema amb un dels teus fitxers, El fitxer File:Pararge xiphioides (7051500987).jpg. L’he descarregat correctament i li he tret les marques d'aigua però no sé per quina raó no em deixa carregar-lo de nou. Potser tu em podries dir alguna manera de carregar-lo bé. De fet mai he tingut cap problema amb els teus fitxers però aquest se'm resisteix i és una pena perquè és bellíssim. Agraïda--Edithsme (talk) 14:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Edithsme, it's not my image; User:Tm transferred it from flickr using my tool, is all. --Magnus Manske (talk) 10:07, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Perdona, encara tinc molt que aprendre :)

Use of upload bot

Hello,

There are a number of images I wish to upload from Geograph.org, however would like to avoid the manual work. I was hoping you could help me here. Could your bot possibly be directed to do so, or can you point me in the right direction for setting up a similar system? Thank you,

Kind regards Mtaylor848 (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Mtaylor848, I don't have a mass-upload bot, only this. User:Multichill once ran a mass upload bot for geograph, see here.. --Magnus Manske (talk) 11:49, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. Regards, Mtaylor848 (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Hanover

Kannst du die Blumenbilder mal alle rausholen aus der Kategorie [3] [Category:Hanover]. Ich weiß nicht, was die mit der Stadt Hannover zu tun haben. --AxelHH (talk) 11:24, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Ich hab' die da nicht reingetan...--Magnus Manske (talk)

Deletion of the image

Hello Magnus,

This image has no more use and the kingfisher airline has ceased all of its operation. Hence request you to delete this screen shot. Thanks

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trz-lhr.jpg#file 93.115.89.126 12:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

User talk:Magnus Manske/Archive 10

et.wikipedia templates for CommonsHelper

Way to find files uploades using Flickr2Commons by user

schwerer Bug bei Erstellung von TUSC-Konten

Credited uploaders in a list?

Add information tool forces insecure http protocol

CommonsHelper und TUSC

Question

Transfered from Flickr. to Wikimedia

Notification about possible deletion

Feld „Anmerkungen“ fällt beim Dateitransfer untern Tisch

Changing a pic on wikimedia commons

GLAMorous

geograph_org2commons

Überkategorisierung

Problems with Geograph-to-Commons tool

Sum-it-up and WhatIsThat?

Sorting by language code in WhatIsThat?

Speed of WhatIsThat?

Bug with Original upload date

Persönlichkeitsrechte

Bot flag

aerial view of Monreale cloister

Commons Commander

Something wrong with your bot

File Upload Bot is not adding EXIF data

Notification about possible deletion

Categorización de imágenes de un album

Category: Macroglossum stellatarum

Cropbot problem

Notification about possible deletion

Image of a status

Happy Holidays

Boston Bruins Bilder

Something wrong with your bot

faq concerning http://tools.wmflabs.org/glamtools/glamorous.php

CommonsHelper Upload

Bitte das Bild löschen http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ska_Keller.jpg

File upload bot and catwegories

Fehlfunktion des Uploadbots?

geohack

De-adminship warning

Erwin's tools.

Terminator

Category:Friedrich Fleischmann

Baglama addition

CommonsHelper

Something wrong with your bot again

Copyright status: File:Test image 2014-03-06.jpg

Copyright status: File:CUBG fountain.jpg

Copyright status: File:Cacti and sky (4811425723).jpg

Copyright status: File:CUBG landscape.jpg

Copyright status: File:Red leaves 2.jpg

flickr2commons & sequential file renaming

Flickr2commons null issue

Diskussion auf dem Village pump

CC-4.0 Lizenzen und CommonsHelper

Commons Commander

OMG, screaming, horror, panic

CommonsHelper-Verbesserung

Some suggestions for f2c

Suggestion for wdfist-tool

Copyright status: File:Some red thing (8237300129).jpg

Copyright status: File:House in Lüneburg (4838105025).jpg

Flickr2commons suggestion

int:filedesc

usualsuspects tool at Labs

TUSC is down

ArchiveBot

problemes amb la carrega

Use of upload bot

Category:Hanover

Deletion of the image

Navigation menu

Search