User talk:Macarrones

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TUSC token 8729e57b4f853dc87a4912569e778fba[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Macarrones, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:LitolffsTomb.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

You copied this file with a completely different license than the one authorized by the uploader/author at en:W, turning a free licensed image into a copyright violation. Don't do that. Thanks. Infrogmation (talk) 13:53, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Macarrones!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:07, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastiano del Piombo[edit]

Grazie a te!


Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Adam by tullio lombardo.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Stefan4 (talk) 21:40, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Corpus[edit]

La verdad es que las he quitado de la categoría Monstrances in Spain conscientemente y para que la categoría quede más despejada, que por cierto, ayer estuve clasificando a las custodias de España por provincias y por comunidades autónomas.

Y todas esas fotografías del Corpus Christi de Burgos ya precisamente están en la categoría de Corpus Christi de Burgos, por eso les quité la de Monstrances in Spain. ¿Está conforme?.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 14:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Precisamente ha dado usted en el clavo. En esas fotografías del Corpus burgalés apenas se ve la custodia, y en la categoría Monstrances in Spain creo yo que solo deben aparecer custodias en solitario o que ocupen la mayor parte de la imagen.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 15:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yo también admiro muchísimo sus contribuciones y sus imagenes, así que el sentimiento es mutuo. Francamente, el tema de la orfebrería española parece que no despierta mucho interés entre los usuarios, aunque gracias a Dios hay algunos tesoros catedralicios, como el de Sevilla, de los que hay muy buenas fotografías en Commons. Pero esa es la excepción.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 16:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Continuando con el Paular[edit]

mini Buenas, Macarrones. He localizado otro cuadro que se encuentra en la categoría de El Paular (aunque no está en la categoría del "claustro del monasterio" como los otros cuadros, sino en la principal), que aunque coincide en temática con los del monasterio de El Paular, no es uno de los cuadros allí colgados. Este cuadro parece que pertenece a una serie que se encuentra en el Museo del Louvre, por lo tanto, no debería estar ahí. No sabía que existía esta serie hasta hace poco, pero no es la misma que la del Paular (porque seré tan puntilloso :) ). Saludos.--Zumalabe (talk) 17:42, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Je, je, está muy bien ser riguroso. Viendo el historial de esa imagen, está claro que es un error de Sinuhe20, que modificó -me imagino que sin mala voluntad- los datos del lugar de conservación de la obra. Quizá se podría justificar la categoría si se supiera (yo lo desconozco) que fue encargada para alguna dependencia del Paular. Pero, sin tener datos, creo que se puede quitar esa categoría, que es equívoca. Un saludo. --Macarrones (talk) 19:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
El problema es que yo me manejo bastante bien en Wikipedia, pero no en Commons, y no se editar o manejar categorías de fotos, sino lo hubiera hecho yo mismo. Saludos.--Zumalabe (talk) 22:31, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, OK. Ya he visto como has hecho, simplemente es jugar con las categorías que figuran en la parte inferior de la fotografía. Es algo que tengo que probar. Muchas gracias.--Zumalabe (talk) 07:23, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jesús Ortega Irusta.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jesús Ortega Irusta.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:03, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Respondido. --Macarrones (talk) 12:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:C. Cameron Macauley in the Navy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chubbles (talk) 01:41, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]