User talk:MOs810/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, MOs810!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:08, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Do you have a better version of File:Veolia Tczew.JPG?

Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  Nederlands  polski  português  svenska  suomi  македонски  українська  日本語  עברית  +/−


Thank you for your submission of File:Veolia Tczew.JPG. While all submissions are useful, do you think you might be able to supply a better quality version of the same, or similar, content? In many cases, the largest and highest resolution possible is the most useful version to have available. (MediaWiki has automatic resizing functionality, so there is no need for multiple versions of the same image at different sizes, users can select any size and the software will generate and cache the needed resolution on the fly.)

If you can supply the same exact image as File:Veolia Tczew.JPG at a larger resolution (or media at a higher bitrate, etc.), please just upload it over the original, users will get the new higher quality version with no further effort on your part. If on the other hand, the content is only similar, it is best to select a new image name, as there may be uses already where some aspect of the existing media was key to the usage. In the latter case, if you can provide a crosslink reference to the new image in the older one and vice versa, that will be extremely helpful.

Again, thank you very much for your contribution, it is appreciated.

High Contrast (talk) 17:16, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Niestety - już go zmniejszyłem. W przyszłości będę ładował większe. Pozdrawiam.

File:Ronchamp kaplica.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Coyau (talk) 23:39, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

  • MOs810, we Francji prace Le Corbusiera sa objete przez prawo autorskie, okazuje sie, ze nie mozemy ich w zwiazku z tym fotografowac i rozpowszechniac. Spadkobiercy Le Corbusiera sa jedynymi osobami, ktore moga rozporzadzac reprodukcjami tych prac w jakiejkolwiek formie. Obawiam sie, ze to jest wlasnie powodowem usuwania Twojego zdjecia. Zobacz tu zeby przyjrzec sie aspektom prawnym. Pozdrawiam, Ziel (talk) 07:41, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Oscar_Niemeyer_Wulkan_Hawr.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Pymouss Let’s talk - 17:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi MOs810,
could you please add the name of the sculptor who created this plaque. --Túrelio (talk) 11:55, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Tusk_Poznan_2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 ■ MMXX  talk 15:01, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Ambar_1900.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Warfieldian (talk) 17:35, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:56, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Castle in Poznan.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Castle in Poznan.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JDavid (talk) 21:15, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Wisla_Poznan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oleola (talk) 05:47, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Imperial District Poznan.JPG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Imperial District Poznan.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Imperial District Poznan.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JDavid (talk) 14:37, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Czy nazywasz się Witold Milewski? Jeżeli nie to nie podawaj się autor tego projektu i jeżeli chcesz zachować to zdjęcie na Commons zdobądź jego zgodę na wykorzystanie projektu. Nie cofaj szablonów bez słowa. Dziękuję JDavid (talk) 14:44, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Cyt. "Wolno rozpowszechniać: 1) utwory wystawione na stałe na ogólnie dostępnych drogach, ulicach, placach lub w ogrodach, jednakże nie do tego samego użytku". Nie jest to stała ekspozycja wystawiona trwale z miejscem (np. posąg). IMO ponadto nie jest to miejsce ogólnodostępne. Projektowi nowowybudowanego zamku mimo, że objętego prawem autorskim – będzie można mu zrobić zdjęcie i opublikować podobnie jak np. Centrum Stomatologiczne Uniwersytetu Medycznego lub Stadion Miejski. JDavid (talk) 17:33, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Pillow_Fichtelberg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Miebner (talk) 14:57, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pvek komiks Poznan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Vera (talk) 09:30, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Spójrz do kategorii Category:Streets in Poland tam nie ma wolnych swobodnych plikow jak ten. Tylko istnieja podkategorie z np. ulicami wedlug miast itd. Wiec tak nalezy tworzyc kategorie a nie wrzucac wszystkie polskie ulice do jednej kategorie Ulice w Polsce bo wtedy powstanie zbior tysiecy plikow bez odpowiedniego podzialu. W zwiazku z tym lepiej pozostawic taki plikk w dziale danego miasta i jesli komus zalezy niech tworzy katefgorie "Ulice w tym miescie".

Co do kat. Category:Winter in Poland tę moge przywrocic ale tez byloby wlasciwiej stworzyc osobna "Winter in Pobiedziska". Tak jest przejrzyscie.

Mam nadzieje że rozumiesz co mam na mysli. Pozdrawiam. --Lowdown (talk) 15:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


-- Saibo (Δ) 22:56, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Fajnie, że wgrywasz pliki na Wikimedia Commons, ale mógłbyś odczekać te parę minut, aż ten niebieski Citroën odjedzie… 83.26.55.198 19:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Poznan_Lech_Br_from_Szczepankowo.JPG

Witaj, na zdjęciu nie ma ani kawałka browaru. Całość widoczna na zdjęciu to słodownia , należąca zasadniczo do francuskiego koncernu Soufflet. Z browarem ma tyle wspólnego, że sprzedaje mu słód. Nie znam się na comąs za bardzo, byłoby fajnie, jakby to jakoś poprawić. Maikking (talk) 11:08, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Mascot of the championships EURO 2012 Poznan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Teofilo (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Fu EURO 2012 Poznan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bartek444 (talk) 12:46, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Inicjatywa Pracownicza.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Masur (talk) 07:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Poznan miasto gospodarz EURO2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 18:40, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Monza modern arch.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

124.149.151.113 14:53, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gurkenradweg (logo).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gurkenradweg (logo).JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Motopark (talk) 11:00, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Only text only logos are allowed in Commons without OTRS-permission

Only text only logos are allowed in Commons without OTRS-permission Motopark (talk) 11:01, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jarogniew Drweski.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jarogniew Drweski.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

W opisie umieściłeś informację, że jesteś autorem i dysponujesz prawami do publikacji obrazu przedstawiajacego postać prezydenta Jarogniewa Drwęskiego umieszczonego w Urzędzie Miasta Poznania. Czy tak? Tomasz Wachowski (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello MOs810,
I stumbled over this File - - today, exploring WP for Margaret Mead.
Under "Summary - Description" of the page all I find is this:
> Description
> English: Poznan, graffiti - Campus, Szamarzewskiego Street.
> Polski: Graffiti w Poznaniu na kampusie UAM przy ul. Szamarzewskiego.
I think, it would be nice for non-Polish users to get a translation of the displayed text (to English).
Regards • Jaybear...disc.13:09, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:JIII Sobieski Poznan MPK.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 10:29, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Marsupilami Poznan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:51, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

File:007 Skyfall, Poznan.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 20:17, 27 July 2013 (UTC)


Hi MOs810, please add the name of the sculptor of the sculpture in the foreground to the description. --Túrelio (talk) 15:15, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 12:11, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 06:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

File:The biggest enemy of capitalists - pregnancy, woman, child. UAM Poznan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A.Savin 17:17, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 07:40, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 14:13, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 16:59, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

File:FSC Zuk, Poznan, ul. Suwalska.jpg i File:Zuk, Poznan, Cicha street.jpg

Hej

Dzięki za wrzucenie powyższych zdjęć Żuków. Chciałbym się zapytać czy wersje, które wrzuciłeś to największe wersje tych zdjęć jakie masz? Na Wikimedia Commons powinno się wrzucać zdjęcia w jak największej rozdzielczości, a z tego co widzę po parametrach twojego aparatu to na pewno może on robić większe zdjęcia.

Pozdrawiam - SuperTank17 (talk) 13:45, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Kiedy wpisałem w Google "Samsung GT-P3100" to znalazłem stronę według której twój aparat powinien mieć maksymalną rozdzielczość 2048 x 1536 pikseli. Sprawdź w ustawieniach aparatu, tam powinna być opcja typu "rozdzielczość" lub "jakość". Jak mówiłem na Wikimedia Commons najlepiej wrzucać zdjęcia w jak największej rozdzielczości.
SuperTank17 (talk) 22:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mialy, church (5).JPG

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mialy, church (5).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 13:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
Dzień dobry,

chcielibyśmy Pana poinformować, że zdjęcie przedstawiające Sanktuarium Miłosierdzia Bożego w Świebodzinie – oczywiście po podaniu informacji dot. praw autorskich – zostało umieszczone na stronie naszego niekomercyjnego projektu << Kalendarza FVKS "W Podróży" 2014 >>. Motywem przewodnim są "widoki". Nie wykluczone, że pojawią się tam kolejne zdjęcia Pana autorstwa.

http://kalender.fvks.eu/pl/ http://kalender.fvks.eu/pl/2014/03/12/sanktuarium-milosierdzia-bozego-swiebodzin-pl/

Mamy nadzieję, że wszystko się zgadza.

Pozdrawiamy FVKS - Förderverein Kulturstadt Görlitz-Zgorzelec e.V. (Stowarzyszenie Promocji Miasta Kultury Görlitz-Zgorzelec t.z.) kalender@fvks.eu, Agata, Cornelia, Matthias fvks (talk) 13:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Hej! Natknąłem się ostatnio na artykuł o Wojciechu Szczęsnym Kaczmarku, który zilustrowałeś powyższym plikiem. Czy wiesz może, kto jest autorem tego portretu i jak wygląda jego status prawnoautorski? Obawiam się, że jeśli obraz nie należy do domeny publicznej, ani nie został udostępniony na zasadach wolnej licencji, to nie możemy przechowywać Twojej fotografii w Wikimedia Commons, ponieważ jest ona pracą pochodną od obrazu, bez wystarczającego wkładu twórczego. odder (talk) 16:19, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Okej — przed chwilą usunąłem to zdjęcie. odder (talk) 19:50, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
Dzień dobry,

zapraszamy do udziału w Konkursie Fotograficznym „W Podróży”. Więcej: www.fotowettbewerb.fvks.eu .

Pozdrawiamy Zespół stowarzyszenia FVKS - Förderverein Kulturstadt Görlitz-Zgorzelec e.V. Agata, Cornelia, Matthias fvks (talk) 12:30, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Qatar Air monitor in jet.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 06:16, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Lednica cemetery, grave 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gżdacz (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Lednica cemetery, grave 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gżdacz (talk) 14:05, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Hej

Jesteś pewien, że traktor na zdjęciu to Ursus C-360? Niestety numer na masce jest nieczytelny na zdjęciu.

Pozdrawiam. - SuperTank17 (talk) 21:24, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Jeśli zdjęcie jest z 1999 roku, to należy zmienić datę w opisie zdjęcia. Zwiadowca 21 16:38, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Zmieniłem. W opisie było |date=2014-10-27 23:44:23, rok 99 był w nazwie pliku i opisie zdjęcia. Teraz nie ma to wielkiego znaczenia, ale byś może kiedyś będzie automatyczne kategoryzowanie wg daty w szablonie. Zwiadowca 21 20:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Ham from Schwarzwald PL.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 20:25, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Cześć. Być może już zauważyłeś. Utworzyłem paręset podkategorii dla wiosek, których zdjęcia wisiały w kategoriach gmin. Wcześniej próbowałem nieco poukładać zdjęcia w hasłach o wioskach, zostawiając co ważniejsze fotografie i dodając link do Commons. No, ale okazało się, że część wsi nie ma własnych kategorii. Poleciałem hurtowo, jeśli dla danej wioski było choć jedno zdjęcie (jeszcze nie wszystko skategoryzowałem). Potem będzie nieco łatwiej przeszukiwać zasoby, gdyby ktoś z hasła o wsi chciał zobaczyć, co jeszcze jest w Commons. A poza tym szybciej będzie można dodawać kategorie dla plików. Widzę, że ostatnio z woj. wielkopolskiego ty najwięcej ładujesz. Ciekawe te telewizory na polach. Sławek Borewicz (talk) 10:53, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Banana and eggs 0.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- RTA 18:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Morasko, Poznan, landscape (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vikiçizer (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
For the picture of St. Mary's Church in Příbor! Aarp65 (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
For the Sigmund-Freud-house pictures! Aarp65 (talk) 14:47, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Witam: Chciałbym prosić o pozwolenie użycia zdjęcia Akademii Muzycznej w Poznaniu (dawny Ewangelicki dom związkowy) w książce biograficznej o polskim pastorze Gustawie Manitiusie (1880-1940). Zdjęcie było użyte dla ilustracji tekstu, w zmniejszonym formacie, w wersji czarno białęj (odcienie szarości), z atrybucją autorstwa.

Andrzej Manitius amanitiu@gmu.edu Amanitiu (talk) 16:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Witam:

Dziekuje za zgodę na wykorzystanie zdjęcia Akademii Muzycznej w książce. Chciałbym również prosić o zgodę na wykorzystnie zdjęcia budynku Paulinum w tej samej książce. Wydaje mi się, że już wysłałem taką prośbę ale teraz nie mogę znaleźć potwierdzenia. Książka: Ks. Gustaw Manitius, polski pastor ewangelicki (w Poznaniu, lata 1924-1939), ukaże się na jesieni 2015. Zdjęcie byłoby z niedużym formacie (podobnie jak na stronie Wikipedii) w wersji czarno białej (odcienie szarości) z odpowiednią atrybucją autorstwa MOs810 . Łącze pozdrowienia Andrzej Manitius McLean, Virginia, USA. Amanitiu (talk) 00:42, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Bialystok Fabryczny, lipiec 1992.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Megarion (talk) 19:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Karol Zaleski

Cześć. Widzę, że publikowałeś zdjęcia z cmentarza Category:Jean-Marie Vianney cemetery in Poznań. Może dałbyś radę znaleźć i zrobić zdjęcie tamtejszego nagrobka Karola Zaleskiego. Pozdrawiam. Lowdown (talk) 10:17, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Niestety nie mam dokładnego położenia - akurat wczoraj dowiedziałem się że KZ został tam pochowany i dlatego do Ciebie napisałem. Cmentarz jest bardzo obszerny? Lowdown (talk) 15:57, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Pacztecik czy krokiet?

Cześć, mam pytanie dotyczące Twojego zdjęcia File:Barszcz, pasztecik, Borgowo.JPG. Czy to na pewno jest pasztecik? Czy to danie tak właśnie było opisane w restauracyjnym jadłospisie? Pytam dlatego, że mnie z kształtu wygląda to bardziej na krokiet, i chciałbym się upewnić, czy nazwa pliku jest poprawna. — Kpalion(talk) 10:51, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2015 в Україні. Увага! Опитування / Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Ukraine. Survey

Вітаємо!

8 липня 2015 року вийшов закон №122-ЗРК/2015 «Про внесення змін до Закону Республіки Крим ”Про об'єкти культурного спадку в Республіці Крим”», яким об'єкти культурної спадщини Криму було визнано такими, що підлягають державній охороні Російської Федерації. Спираючись на це, НП «Вікімедіа РУ» та спільнота російських учасників вікіпроектів цього року проводить щорічний фотоконкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки» в Росії уже із Кримом у своїх конкурсних списках. Просимо висловитися щодо того, якою, на Вашу думку, має бути українська частина. Також Ви можете висловити Ваші ідеї щодо поліпшення конкурсу.Опитування за лінком / Survey is here.

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на Вікісховищі. 20:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

File:MOs810, WG 2014 48, powiat obornicki (rezerwat Welna) (12).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 17:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

File:MOs810, WG 2014 48, powiat obornicki (rezerwat Welna) (13).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 17:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Data w aparacie

Coś mi się wydaje że masz źle datę ustawioną w aparacie, bo jak w chodzę w twoje zdjęcia to w metadanych masz datę maj 2010. Chyba że ładujesz zdjęcia z archiwum. Kapsuglan (talk) 09:51, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:JOWISZ Hotel in Poznan.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:16, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:JOWISZ Hotel in Poznan.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:20, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Old cemetery (Ev.) Pulaskiego, Poznan.JPG

To nie jest chyba ewangelicki, tylko część św. Wojciecha [1] Kapsuglan (talk) 17:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

[2] Zobacz kilka map od około 1910 roku. jest albo Adalbert Kirchof, albo św. Wojciecha (to właściwie jedno i to samo). Szukam artykułu o eksuhamacjach w tym miejscu jeszcze. Kapsuglan (talk) 16:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Do Pana Wikipedysty MOs810:

Moja książka o Gustawie Manitiusie, w której będą dwa zdjęcia Pana autorstwa będzie wydrukowana w nadchodzącym miesiącu. Jeśli życzy Pan sobie otrzymać egzemplarz autorski, będę potrzebował adresu na który ten egzemplarz wysłać. Pozdrowienia i podziękowania Andrzej Manitius Wikepdysta Amanitiu mój normalny adres internetowy jest amanitiu@gmu.edu Proszę o wiadomość na ten adres. Amanitiu (talk) 23:46, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:33, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Cannes SNCF.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:56, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Pepsi Tailand.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:MOs810 WG 14 2016 (ev. cemetery in Nowa Kazmierka) (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 12:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

File:LeRustique Noel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(tJosve05a (c) 11:59, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:2 dni w Nowym Jorku Poznan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Cjp24 (talk) 07:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Ciek z Cytadeli do Warty, Poznan.jpg

Głowy nie daję, ale to chyba ujście Bogdanki  ;) Kapsuglan (talk) 09:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

No właśnie tak średnio z źródłami, są ciekawe informacje i było też o ujściu Bogdanki ale nie nadające się na wiki, tu [3] jest zdjęcie tego miejsca w artykule o Bogdance Kapsuglan (talk) 08:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear MOs810,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Hawr calosc miasta.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Culex (talk) 16:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Category Gorce i Category: Beskid Wyspowy

Powrzucałeś tutaj zdjęcia bez szczegółowej kategoryzacji. U góry w opisie kategorii jest uwaga, że są to kategorie ogólne, a zdjęcia należy skategoryzowac w poszczególnych podkategoriach. Selso (talk) 09:02, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 14:38, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Please be civil

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  Nederlands  polski  português  Simple English  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  العربية  +/−


You are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigate edit wars. If your behaviour is not moderated, you may be blocked from further editing.

Sealle (talk) 10:05, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Nie dążę do wojen edycyjnych. Zarzut nie ma pokrycia w faktach i jest kłamliwy. Zarzut o ataki osobiste jest natomiast kuriozalny. Dość ostro zareagowałem w kwestii nie wtrącania się w polskie panoramy, ale ww. użytkownik zapewne nie dostrzegł pewnej delikatnej ironii. Zostawiłem Mu info na stronie dyskusji. MOs810 (talk) 11:44, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Pacifier Image used

Hi, one of your images is used on http://www.sueddeutsche.de/leben/prozess-wenn-kinder-wegen-vernachlaessigung-sterben-1.3654792 2001:608:A01:2:FD7C:56C3:D39A:8394 19:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Nikos Chadzinikolau przed 1990.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ankry (talk) 16:02, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Zmiana nazwy pliku

Witaj! Czy posiadasz uprawnienia lub umiejętności zmiany nazwy pliku. Jeżeli tak to czy mógłbyś zmienić File:Ulica żelazka i park Jana Pawła II w Poznaniu - grudzień 2017.jpg na budowa parku Rataje w Poznaniu. Omyłkowo źle nazwałem zdjęcie. PozdrawiamKoefbac (talk) 12:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

DziękiKoefbac (talk)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi MOs810, is this plaque installed inside the church or outside? Do you know when it (or the church) was built? Could you add the name of the sculptor to the description. --Túrelio (talk) 16:31, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Beze

Kestane şekeri ve beze

Hi there. What you call beza or bezy (singular-plural?) is "beze" for us. Have some candied chestnuts from Turkey and beze. Did you know anything about "pastane"s (kind of tea saloon and pastry shops) in Turkey? They are mostly run by people from the Black Sea Region whose ancestors have gone "northwest" in Ottoman and early Republican times and brought (or also took, perhaps) with them some very sweet things... Afiyet olsun. (Enjoy. :) --E4024 (talk) 10:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

File:1956 Uprising, Poznan, museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

95.49.22.76 21:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Wilanow znaczek 60 gr (1967).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abraham (talk) 06:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Lodz, kamienica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lantuszka (talk) 11:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

File:No TAV Bergamo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 05:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Hallo MOs810/Archive 1, da das o. g. Bild nur einzelne Früchte an blattachselständigen Stielen zeigt, sollte es sich hier um Polygonatum odoratum handeln, nicht um Polygonatum multiflorum. Ich habe (hoffentlich in korrekter Weise) die Artzuordnung geändert. Die Datei muss aber noch umbenannt werden. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:27, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

#invoke:Autotranslate Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:44, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Panienka

W Internecie znalazłem tajemnicze informacje, które nijak nie pokrywają mi się z rzeczywistością: "W zachowanym 2-hektarowym parku znajduje się dworek z początku XX wieku. Obiekt ten w latach 1936-39 był własnością prof. Tadeusza Konopińkiego, specjalisty z zakresu hodowli zwierząt, a w latach 1957- 62 dyrektora Zootechniki w Krakowie, jak również profesora Wyższej Szkoły Rolniczej we Wrocławiu. Dworek był miejscem pracy pisarki Joanny Konopińkiej - Reinhard." Tyle rewelacje z Internetu. Na aktualnej mapie żadnego "parku" nie widać, a w miejscu gdzie kiedyś wznosił się dwór, stoją jakieś domki jednorodzinne. Potrafisz pomóc? Zwiadowca 21 10:17, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Cywolka or Pakhtusov?

Hallo MOs810, somewhere a mistake → here or here?--Semenov.m7 (talk) 08:47, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi MOs810, I just want to inform you that this butterfly you posted is misidentified: while it is a Papilio, it is not Papilio troilus (see e.g. the incompatible hindwing patterns). I modified the file description and name. Kind regards --LamBoet (talk) 05:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Fenix

Cześć, a co jest nie tak z licencją dla tego pliku? Godai (talk) 10:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Tak, to okładka. Mojego autorstwa. Chyba jeszcze twórcy wolno rozporządzać swoim utworem niezależnie od tego, jak został wykorzystany? ;) W razie wątpliwości jestem też naczelnym tego magazynu, więc mogę bez problemu wystosować zgodę redakcji na wykorzystanie projektu okładki z taką licencją. Godai (talk) 11:49, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Prof. Stanislaw Dobrzycki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gower (talk) 05:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O (talk) 09:18, 15 April 2019 (UTC)