User talk:MJJR/archive 2016-2017
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
MJJR - User talk: ARCHIVE 2016-2017
QI Tunisia training
As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:58, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maresciallo Piccinni Leopardi ship R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Venezia San Simeone Piccolo R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brugge Koningin Elisabethlaan 2-4-6 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Venezia Palazzo Giustinian R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Venezia Rio di Sant'Isepo R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brugge Begijnhofkerk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brugge Sashuis R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brugge Begijnhof R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Brugge Sashuis R01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brugge Sashuis R01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Brugge Begijnhof R01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brugge Begijnhof R01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Damme Stadhuis R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oostkerke R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oostkerke Pompestraat R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ursel Oorlogsgedenkteken R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Leonardsstuwbrug
Geachte,
uw foto toont niet de Sint-Leonardusbrug maar de Leonardsstuwbrug. De benaming Leonardusbrug wordt niet meer gebruikt sinds 1918 en was eigenlijk de benaming voor één van de bruggen aan het Dampoortsas. Zie beeldbank Brugge.
vriendelijke groeten — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefflater (talk • contribs) 18:41, 09 November 2016 (UTC)
Utilisation d'une de vos images
Bonjour,
Je me permets de vous informer que l'Institut du monde arabe va utiliser une de vos images (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luxor_Souq_R01.jpg) dans le cadre d'un webdocumentaire sur la culture et l'identité arabe, intitulé "Vous avez dit arabe ?".
Merci beaucoup d'avoir partagé cette belle image ! Calame (talk) 11:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Happy holidays! 2017! ;)
|
* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * * | |
| * Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC) |
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
(Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Blankenberge Monument Lippens en De Bruyne
Hallo MJJR, ik had hier een foto toegevoegd waarop zowel Joseph Lippens als Henri De Bruyne met Sefu bin Hamid, de zoon van Tippo Tip zijn afgebeeld. De reden voor de revert: als niet duidelijk is wie wie is, zegt zo'n foto niet zoveel. Een blik op de OP van Indy beetle verduidelijkt het probleem met de identificatie. De beschrijving bij de foto in George Grenfell and the Congo bevestigt dit... Gezien de eerder door jou gemaakte foto dacht ik dat je misschien ook detailfoto's nam waarop te zien is wie wie is. Alvast bedankt.
- PS. Persoonlijk, geef ik er de voorkeur aan om quality images aan artikels toe te voegen, het kietelt dus natuurlijk om deze afbeelding te vervangen (ook bij Joseph Lippens) door deze...
Lotje (talk) 06:48, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Montsoreau Castle R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brézé Castle R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brézé Castle R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Clérey Monument aux Morts R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 22:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Happy holidays! 2018! ;)
|
|
* Happy Holidays 2018, MJJR! * | |
|