User talk:Calame

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Raiders of the Louvre[edit]

Bonjour Calame ! Pour te faciliter la tâche, voici les images téléchargées depuis mon dernier raid au Louvre, section art islamique :

Téléchargement du 14–15 octobre :

Jastrow 09:02, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Razzia sur le Louvre III[edit]

Voici le lot de consolation :

Jastrow 18:25, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Jastrow,
Excuse mon voyeurisme, mais je découvre chaque fois avec bonheur tes nouvelles trouvailles. Bravo pour la qualité des photos.
Fabos 21:01, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Byzance, ici Byzance, deux minutes d'arrêt[edit]

Voici la première livraison, le reste doit encore être traité.

Jastrow 09:49, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Islamic manuscripts[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you have depopulated the Category:Islamic manuscripts and redirected it to Category:Islamic paintings. I think this is a bad idea. Category:Islamic manuscripts is a sub-category of Category:Manuscripts by style, which is a sub-category of Category:Illuminated manuscripts. By redirecting Category:Islamic manuscripts to Category:Islamic paintings, you have made the latter a virtual sub-category of Category:Manuscripts by style. I think that only images that one should find as one descends down through the categories under Category:Illuminated manuscripts should be of illuminated manuscripts. However, Category:Islamic paintings contains images of paintings that are not of illuminated manuscripts. Dsmdgold 20:10, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

category and mausoleum of Akbar[edit]

Hi i have more photo of akbar's tomb, but the quality is not as good as that one. Chaerani 03:46, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Niark niark[edit]

Salut,

J'ai déjà fait le tour des conflits de modifs sur l'article fr:Dieu de l'Artémision ; maintenant, je n'attends plus que tu finisses fr:Bronzes de Riace :)

Concernant la catégorie, c'est normal : il est impossible de renommer une catégorie : il faut en créer une nouvelle et faire les modifs une à une à la main. c'est réglé. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 23:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture seldjoukide[edit]

Salut Calame,

J'espère que tout se passe bien pour toi depuis le temps qu'on ne s'est pas croisé sur Wiki. J'ai ramené des photos d'éléments d'architecture seldjoukide de Konya. J'ai pensé qu'ils pourraient t'intéresser. C'est par ici. Amicalement, Fabienkhan (talk) 15:01, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Islamic Manuscripts[edit]

The photo was taken by me from Adilnor Collection, Sweden. It was written probably around 13th century. Some other manuscripts from the collection can be found on Flickr and www.adilnor.com.

Best regards

Danieliness

Arts de l'Islam[edit]

Bonjour, et ravo pour fr:Représentation figurée dans les arts de l'Islam. Je me permets juste de faire remarquer que d'après le musée, l'image de tête parait être une copie d'après un peintre italien [1]. Je ne sais pas si ça change grand chose au fond mais ça veut peut-être la peine d'être remarqué. --Zolo (talk) 07:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour ! Le modèle {{Technique}} a pas mal de limitations dues au fait qu'il est traduit dans tout un tas de langues, certaines avec déclinaisons, adjectif avant le nom, etc. Du coup, en l'état, on ne peut pas utiliser plusieurs adjectifs pour le même nom. Il faut ruser. Par exemple, pour « verre soufflé, émaillé et doré », j'utilise {{technique|glass|adj=blown}}, {{technique|decoration|adj=enameled|and=decoration|adjand=gilded}}.

Pour {{Period}}, que j'ai découvert il y a peu, j'avoue que je sèche. C'est User:Zolo le grand manitou des modèles internationaux dans le domaine des musées.

Pour {{Other date}} le problème est différent : le logiciel limite le nombre d'imbrications de modèles. On espère que le passage prochain à un autre langage de programmation pour MediaWiki permettra de résoudre le problème. En l'état on ne peut pas afficher « milieu du XIIIe siècle ». Là encore il faut ruser, par exemple {{Other date|ca|1250}}, ou {{Other date|ca|1250|1300}} pour « deuxième moitié du XIIIe siècle ». Jastrow (Λέγετε) 07:56, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{Period}} marche désormais après intervention de Zolo. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:17, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not an Arabian Nights manuscript?[edit]

According to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ManuscriptAbbasid.jpg is an Arabian Nights manuscript. I see that your removed the category. Why? --Judithcomm (talk) 14:39, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 01:22, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Utilisation d'image[edit]

Merci pour votre message concernant l'utilisation d'une de mes images par l'Institut du monde arabe. C'est un plaisir et un honneur pour moi de pouvoir contribuer ainsi - de façon modeste, il est vrai - à une initiative de ce prestigieux institut. -- MJJR (talk) 17:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Islamic art of book has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 19:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Fishes in islamic art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 19:19, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Clash of civilizations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


LaundryPizza03 (d) 05:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Clash of civilizations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 05:07, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]