User talk:MB-one/Archive 6

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tuning World Bodensee 2018, Friedrichshafen (OW1A0280).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:33, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyundai Kona Electric, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:16, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ILA 2018, Schönefeld (1X7A5734-2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo. --ArildV 20:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Bilder und Werbeanzeigen

File:Güterschifffahrt Boßler.jpg File:Firmenanzeige Gebr. Bossler GbR-Personenschifffahrt.jpg

Hallo MB-one,

ja ich habe das mit den Genehmigungen mal angesprochen. Was dabei rum kam weiß ich nicht, ob sich die Familie B. bei Wikimedia gemeldet hat weiß ich leider auch nicht. Bei den oberen beiden Dateien habe ich folgende rechtliche Situation, als Laie herausgelesen, Es handelt sich um Firmenanzeigen ohne jeglichen künstlerischen Anspruch – also ohne jeglichen urheberrechtlichen Grundstein. Das ist lediglich Text ohne Gestaltung. Ob der nach 65 Jahren wirklich geschützt ist, ist fraglich besonders bei dem Bild

„Güterschifffahrt Boßler. jpg.

Bei den Bildern für den Artikel Ludwig und Jakob Götz, müsste für die Verwendung eine Bestätigung durch einen Herrn Andreas Raab aber eingegangen sein!

Grüße Hiquwus

PS: Was mir auch noch im Nachhinein aufgefallen ist, ist dass in dem Buch Historisches vom Strom von Helmut Betz in dem die Unternehmen der Familie behandelt werden, die gleichen Bilder der Schiffe verwendet werden. Nur die Bilder in Betzs Buch scheinen etwas besser bearbeitet zu sein. Deshalb habe ich auch selbst bei den Bildern eine Schnelllöschung beantragt.

Ansonsten alles Gut. Entferne bitte, was nicht genehmigt wurde so schnell wie möglich und vielen Dank für die Überarbeitung der Commons-Seite Boßler! --Hiquwus (talk) 16:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Maker Faire, Berlin (BL7C0084).jpg

File:Maker Faire, Berlin (BL7C0084).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andy Dingley (talk) 22:23, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:BrandenburgerTorGold.JPG

Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gulfstream G280, EBACE 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex (BL7C0653).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:31, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tuning World Bodensee 2018, Friedrichshafen (OW1A0278).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but the background would need a bit perspective correction -- Spurzem 16:42, 6 June 2018 (UTC)  Done--MB-one 20:22, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sikorsky CH-53K King Stallion, ILA 2018, Schönefeld (1X7A6778).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:22, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gulfstream G280, EBACE 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex (BL7C0660).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO --PJDespa 16:53, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 70 Years Porsche Sports Car, Berlin (1X7A3888).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK although the left crop is slightly wider than the right. --Peulle 21:30, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Hotel für Fotoworkshop in Wien

Hallo, du hast dich für den Commons:19. Fotoworkshop angemeldet. Solltest du ein Hotelzimmer benötigen, melde dich bitte zusätzlich bis 19. Juni über das auf Commons:19. Fotoworkshop/Anmeldung unten verlinkte Hotel-Formular an. Wir freuen uns auf dein Kommen! Danke und liebe Grüße aus Wien --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche, Techno-Classica 2018, Essen (IMG 9716).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 16:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC) @Granada: I am surprised and remember that a while ago you did not like a similar background at all. Incidentally, the Porsche seems distorted or too long. The lighting conditions are not the best either. -- Spurzem 21:56, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche, Techno-Classica 2018, Essen (IMG 9211).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 16:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 50 Years Dornier STOL, Friedrichshafen (1X7A4148-HDR).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and quality image -- Spurzem 21:53, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mammut, OutDoor 2018, Friedrichshafen (1X7A0213).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not the greatest background but the shoe clearly shows enough detail. --Trougnouf 10:58, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OutDoor 2018, Friedrichshafen (1X7A0330).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data on Commons IRC Office Hour, Tuesday 26 June

Greetings,

There will be an IRC office hour for Structured Data on Tuesday, 26 June from 18:00-19:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. You can find more details, as well as date and time conversion, at the IRC Office Hours page on Meta.

Thanks, I look forward to seeing you there if you can make it. -- Keegan (talk) 20:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

What properties does Commons need?

Greetings,

Structured Commons will need properties to make statements about files. The development team is working on making the software ready to support properties; the question is, what properties does Commons need?

You can find more information and examples to help find properties in a workshop on Commons. Please participate and help fill in the list, and let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi RS5, DRIVE, Berlin (1X7A3881).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image but both the file name and description need changing; it's an Audi, not a Porsche.--Peulle 11:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)  Done --MB-one 19:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. GerifalteDelSabana 04:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fjallraven, OutDoor 2018, Friedrichshafen (1X7A0438).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:10, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster, IAA 2017, Frankfurt (1Y7A2083).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 19:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tuning World Bodensee 2018, Friedrichshafen (OW1A0199).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OutDoor 2018, Friedrichshafen (1X7A0309).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! British Airways, Berlin (IMG 8987).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 17:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford Taunus, Cologne (1X7A7150).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 18:54, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Kategorien Piper PA-28

Schönen guten Abend. Eine Verständnisfrage: Warum hast Du die PA-28s aus der Category:Single-piston-engine general aviation aircraft entfernt? Vielleicht habe ich da aber einfach irgend etwas übersehen oder nicht kapiert.

Noch etwas, auch wenn Du dabei formal völlig korrekt lagst: Auch wenn die Category:Piper general aviation aircraft natürlich eine Unterkategorie von Category:Piper aircraft ist und daher alle Betroffenen inclusive der PA-28 eigentlich gar nicht in letztere gehörten, so fehlen mir doch optisch die PA-28s in der gesamten Piper-Übersicht (obwohl das meistgebaute Flugzeug). Meinst Du, man könnte diese Gesamt-Liste trotzdem behalten (inclusive PA-28, PA-28R) ?

Freundliche Grüße und noch einen schönen Abend ! --Uli Elch (talk) 18:08, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Uli Elch,

die PA-28 ist bereits in Category:Single-piston-engine tractor-prop general aviation monoplanes einsortiert, daher habe ich die Überkategorie entfernt. Das gleiche Prinzip gilt für Category:Piper general aviation aircraft. Grüße --MB-one (talk) 18:50, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tram tracks, Berlin ( 1050037).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IAA 2017, Frankfurt (1Y7A3129).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. It looks like a little bit noise and perspective correction may be possible, but IMO it is acceptable for QI. --XRay 16:15, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IAA 2017, Frankfurt (1Y7A3158).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Same as your MB 300 SL. --XRay 16:17, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toyota Mirai, IAA 2017, Frankfurt (1Y7A1888).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little bit dark. The license plate looks like unsharp. --XRay 16:16, 11 July 2018 (UTC) Thanks for the review. Uploaded brighter version, plate is sharp though. --MB-one 20:16, 11 July 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:41, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Friedrich Roecker, Ulm (P1050052).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:58, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Commons Categorisers meetup redux?

It looks like there is a second commons categorisers meetup scheduled for Saturday at 17.00-18.00, see [1]. Not sure if that was a mistake or not - maybe see you there if it's going to take place? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:54, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello Mike Peel,

thank you for noticing. There must have been a communication error. I deleted the entry on today's schedule.

--MB-one (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimania 2018, Cape Town (P1050531).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:43, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimania 2018, Cape Town (P1050237).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Ford_Focus_(3rd_generation)

Category:Ford_Focus_(3rd_generation) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

–Davey2010^Talk 22:35, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimania 2018, Cape Town (P1050763).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, some motion blurring at the beak but I guess it's still acceptable. --GerifalteDelSabana 13:14, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimania 2018, Cape Town ( 1050602).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimania 2018, Cape Town (P1050765).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimania 2018, Cape Town ( 1050391).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimania 2018, Cape Town ( 1050520).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, Cape Town (P1060055).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 21:33, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Kein mistake

Hallo. Das hier war kein Versehen. Die "Category:Aircraft by registration country" sind meta categories, sonst würden sie auch alle in Hunderttausenden von Bildern ersaufen. Man sieht in der Kat-Liste sehr schön, dass nahezu nirgendwo einzelne Bilder abgelegt sind.

Streiten könnte man sich höchstens darüber, ob hier kurzzeitig (!) und informell Rotlinks "geparkt" warden könnten, die dann aber auch zügig abgearbeitet warden sollten. Dies ist hier aber nicht gegeben.

Bei Kanada ist es etwas ähnlich, dort sind aber anscheinend fast alle wie hier schon mit Rotlink ausgestattet. --- Freundliche Grüße --Uli Elch (talk) 14:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Uli Elch,

ich stimme dir zu, dass Category:Aircraft by registration country eine reine Metacat ist. Das trifft auf Category:Aircraft registered in the United States (und analog andere Länder) jedoch nicht zu. Dort können grundsätzlich auch einzelne Bilder einsortiert werden, solange es keine spezifischere Kategorie gibt. Eine Unterkat pro Registrierung ist jedoch bei mehreren vorhandenen Bildern wünschenswert. Deshalb habe ich sie nun angelegt.

Grüße --MB-one (talk) 14:38, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Template:Personality rights

Hallo MB-one, danke, dass du in meine Bilder die Vorlage {{Personality rights}} eingebunden hast. Gibt es einen Grund, dass du das bei manchen, auch deinen eigenen Bildern, nicht machst? Ich kenne mich mit der Verwendung dieser Vorlage nämlich noch nicht so aus. Siehe z. B. File:Schiphol, Hoofdorp ( 1050123).jpg oder ähnliche. Liebe Grüße --Zenith4237 (talk) 07:59, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Zenith4237,

hatte die Vorlage per Filter eingefügt, der eigentlich alle Bilder mit erkennbaren Personen der Wikimania erfassen sollte. Es gab nämlich einen Vorfall, bei dem die abgebildete Person nicht mit dem Bild einverstanden war. Dabei sind offenbar manche (vielleicht sogar meine eigenen) Bilder durchgerutscht.

Grundsätzlich sollte jedes Bild mit erkennbaren Personen dieses Template haben. Aber du hast natürlich recht, dass ich mich für meine selbst hochgeladenen Bilder auch daran halten sollte.

Grüße --MB-one (talk) 09:01, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

"Automotive Industry in.."

Hi, instead of remove the category "Automobiles in" you can add "Motorcycles in..", "Trucks in.." and "Quads in.." I think would be correct (or coherent with your point of view) because Automotive industry is defined as: range of organizations associated with motor vehicles, such as automobiles, trucks and motorcycles. But i think when you remove "automobiles" you're not right. Greetings--Louis.attene (talk) 09:04, 30 July 2018 (UTC) But if you take a look to all the interested categories, then there is a general mistake in not considering trucks and motorcycles (and quads) into the "AUtomotive industry. We change ALL or we let all as it is? Good question :) --Louis.attene (talk) 09:06, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Automotive industry is way broader than just automobiles or even vehicles. It includes, manufacturing processes, related economics etc. So yes, it should be removed everywhere. --MB-one (talk) 17:55, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Techno-Classica 2018, Essen (IMG 9940).jpg

File:Techno-Classica 2018, Essen (IMG 9940).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Guanaco (talk) 17:39, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Alfa Romeo, Techno-Classica 2018, Essen (IMG 9271).jpg

File:Alfa Romeo, Techno-Classica 2018, Essen (IMG 9271).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Guanaco (talk) 17:40, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Porsche, Techno-Classica 2018, Essen (IMG 9251).jpg

File:Porsche, Techno-Classica 2018, Essen (IMG 9251).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Guanaco (talk) 17:42, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Devils Peak, Cape Town (P1050211).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:55, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, Cape Town (P1060031).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. DoF could be better. --XRay 09:12, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, Cape Town ( 1060046).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: Please remove the CAs (or the leaves top right). --XRay 09:12, 31 July 2018 (UTC)  Done --MB-one 11:03, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, Cape Town (P1060025).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:28, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
General view of the western flank of Devil's Peak (Cape Town).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:51, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Bearbeitungskrieg bei File:Friedrichshafen, Hafeneinfahrt, 3.jpeg?

Hallo,

um dieses Scharmützel abzukürzen, schlage ich vor, dass wir uns ein bisschen unterhalten. Es geht um folgende drei Änderungen an Friedrichshafen, Hafeneinfahrt, 3.jpeg (und um weitere ähnliche):

• 21:28, 4 aŭg. 2018‎ MB-one (Moving from Category:Port entrance of Friedrichshafen to Category:Hafenturm (Friedrichshafen)
• 22:43, 4 aŭg. 2018‎ Renardo la vulpo (Undo revision 313633841 by MB-one (talk) – Das Bild zeigt beide Seiten der Hafeneinfahrt, nicht nur den Moleturm)
• 22:50, 4 aŭg. 2018‎ MB-one (+Category:Hafenbahnhof (Friedrichshafen); ±Category:Port entrance of Friedrichshafen→Category:Hafenturm (Friedrichshafen) bitte immer die genauere Kategorie nutzen)

Die „genauere Kategorie“ ist hier eben Category:Port entrance of Friedrichshafen, denn das Bild zeigt die gesamte Hafeneinfahrt, nicht nur den Moleturm (wie ich bereits die Ehre hatte zu bemerken). „Genauer“ heißt nicht unbedingt „tiefer in der Hierarchie“. Sonst könnte man zum Beispiel eine Deutschlandkarte als Category:Hinterfirmiansreut kategorisieren, weil Hinterfirmiansreut ja in Deutschland liegt, also nach deiner Definition „genauer“ ist.

Bitte orientiere dich an der allgemeinen Verwendung von Kategorien, und die sagt nun mal, dass eine Kategorie dem Objekt entsprechen muss und dass Unterkategorien nicht (zusätzlich oder ersatzweise) angegeben werden.

Wenn du mir antworten willst, dann gerne hier mit {{Reply|Renardo la vulpo}}.

Grüße, -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 23:07, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Renardo la vulpo,

ich habe mir deine Anmerkung zu Herzen genommen und einen Kompromiss ausgearbeitet. Damit dürfte sich das Problem erledigt haben.

Grüße --MB-one (talk) 09:51, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Danke. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 11:16, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, Cape Town (P1060070).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Not the best position. Please have a look for CAs at the leaves at the right. --XRay 15:41, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Wikimania 2018, Cape Town ( 1050404).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Golden Acre tower, Cape Town and immediate surroundings at night..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:28, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porsche 911 Nr. 1000000.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Good but; as an object of exhibition geocoding is required. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment It is the millionth Porsche 911. Whether it was photographed in Berlin, in Stuttgart, in Frankfurt or elsewhere, it would have to be indifferent; because it is not a monument that stands on a permanent place. However, the scope should be supplemented, for example, right side, so that other good photos of this car can be classified as valuable. Further I would like a better file name. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 08:47, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Lothar Spurzem I would argue, that this is the "most common viewing angle" for a car and thus the image qualifies for the broader scope. the existence of a VI for a broader scope does not preclude other VICs for more specific scopes. geocoding seems to be a sensible suggestion independently of the VIC, same for more specific file name. Both  Done. --MB-one (talk) 10:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

@MB-one: I should be right, if you mean with the current scope, the award of other photos would not be excluded. Not too long ago, however, I was taught another one. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:13, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:55, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sailing on Lake Constance (1X7A0040).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 23:09, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schiphol, Hoofdorp ( 1050123).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:10, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford Cortina, Cape Town (P1060002).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! African penguin, Cape Town ( 1050598).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

WLE 2018

Hello! I can't see the effort of an additional template like {{Wiki Loves Earth 2018|unesco}}. There is a template with "de" instead of "unesco". And please do not insert a template in the line of a heading. --XRay ^talk 13:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi XRay,

please check Commons:Village_pump#Whats_the_easiest_way_to_find_all_the_files_in_BOTH_two_sets_of_subcategories_and_add_them_to_a_third_category for explanation. I'm trying to fix the format issues. --MB-one (talk) 13:55, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data feedback - Depicts statements draft requirements

Greetings,

A slide presentation of the draft requirements for depicts statements on file pages is up on Commons. Please visit this page on Commons to review the slides and discuss the draft. Thank you, see you on the talk page. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:20, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Two trawlers in Sète.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Two trawlers in Sète.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoda, GIMS 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex (1X7A1562).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:19, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimania 2018, Cape Town (P1050522).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please remove the CA and add some sharpness. --Ermell 12:44, 3 August 2018 (UTC)  Done --MB-one 10:01, 5 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:46, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeitz Museum of Contemporary Art Africa, Cape Town ( 1050775).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 22:06, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimania 2018, Cape Town ( 1050346).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, IMO, except that there's what looks like a dust spot toward the upper left. -- Ikan Kekek 10:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC) Removed. Thanks for noticing. --MB-one 11:52, 7 August 2018 (UTC) Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 19:40, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimania 2018, Cape Town (P1050774).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:50, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spheniscus demersus (African penguin) juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The image is beautiful but for VI a tighter crop would be desirable. The scope is not good. You must refer to the scope on the category that contains the image not on a category parent. You must imperatively give the binominal in italic followed by the vernacular name between parentheses. For animals the term term is juvenile and non-adolescent. That said, the image is very interesting. The scope could be:{{c|Spheniscus demersus (juvenile)‎ |''Spheniscus demersus'' (african penguin)}} (juvenile)‎--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Archaeodontosaurus: Thanks for the comment. As I put in my nomination reason, the scope is more specific than juvenile. We have plenty of good images of african penguin chicks, which can illustrate the juvenile state as good as this one, if not even better. I'm not a biologist, so I am not sure about the appropriate wording and open for suggestions here. However having two sets of parenthesis following each other seems wrong and improper English. How does “Portrait of a juvenile/adolescent/whatever Spheniscus demersus (african penguin)” sound to you? --MB-one (talk) 12:50, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Yes your scope is good and we agree it's not a chick; juvenile is the most appropriate term. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:08, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Portrait of an adolescent african penguin to Portrait of a juvenile Spheniscus demersus (african penguin) --MB-one (talk) 18:22, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment Image is good, but scope should be Spheniscus demersus (African penguin) juvenile We don't need the word portrait and the also the image should be more tightly cropped to be useful as VI
• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

• •  Comment The scope proposal by Charles is the best. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:36, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Portrait of a juvenile Spheniscus demersus (african penguin) to Spheniscus demersus (African penguin) juvenile --MB-one (talk) 17:24, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment Scope all perfect now, thanks. It takes a some practice! - just needs a crop please otherwise you can't see much at thumbnail size. Charles (talk) 23:32, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

WLE- 2018

Please fix all your edits to WLE in Australia images, please place your banner under the WLE Au banner rather than before the images description. Every year Wikimedia AUstralia invest considerable resources in making WLE a success our efforts should be respected. Alternative is if UNSECO could replace those resources consumed, though the banner place should still be below the licensing information as is the standard for WLE events because the description, the author, and the license are the most important pieces of information. Gnangarra 00:14, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Dear User:Gnangarra,

the Unesco template was now moved below the AU template on all images uploaded for WLE-AU. However, I fail to understand, how an unfortunate placement of a template on the file page would take away any of WMAUs efforts.

Cheers --MB-one (talk) 08:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Female red-winged Starling, Cape Town ( 1050242).jpg

Thank you. I have uploaded a fix for the CA on File:Female red-winged Starling, Cape Town ( 1050242).jpg. There is some aqua residue though, as with all CA fixes. Supported on QIC. ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 12:37, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puddle on Table Mountain, Cape Town (P1050299).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Table Mountain plateau, Cape Town (P1050368).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! British Airways Lounge, Cape Town (P1060087).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:52, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toyota Avanza, Cape Town (P1050546).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 15:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schiphol international arrivals concourse, Haarlemmermeer (P1060105).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GPSLeo 13:10, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Female red-winged Starling, Cape Town ( 1050242).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI should have a meaningful name. Most of your nominated images don't have it. It'd be great if the names of your images you decide to nominate for QI have names similar to your descriptions --Podzemnik 13:54, 7 August 2018 (UTC) Renamed (the old file name was perfectly within the naming conventions). --MB-one 16:55, 7 August 2018 (UTC)  Comment The large amount of CA should be fixed. --GerifalteDelSabana 00:36, 8 August 2018 (UTC) GerifalteDelSabana, thanks for the info. Can you mark the areas, which need fixing? --MB-one 09:28, 8 August 2018 (UTC) @MB-one: I've annoted them. I noticed that you're using Lightroom — you could use the remove CA feature. :) Cheers. --GerifalteDelSabana 14:20, 8 August 2018 (UTC) GerifalteDelSabana: The auto CA removal was applied already and, honestly, I don't see any CAs in the image. Are we sure, we are looking at the same version? --MB-one 08:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC) @MB-one: Yes, I'm positively ascertained. Is your screen calibrated? If you don't mind, I can help you fix the CA. --GerifalteDelSabana 23:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)  Support All issues fixed. --GerifalteDelSabana 12:34, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Zeitz Museum of Contemporary Art Africa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Daylight has no interest in the scope however it would be useful to give the sense of the orientation of the view.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • I have to disagree on both. The view of the illuminated building during the night is very different and none is better than the other. So day or night is important for the scope. The viewing angle could be included in the scope, but I would argue, that this is the most valued image in the main viewing angle (front facade, medium distance), thus it doesn't have to be included in the scope. --MB-one (talk) 07:05, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

• Let me rephrase Achaeodontosaurus' point. Daylight is a default category, and therefore doesn't bear mentioning in a scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Exterior of Zeitz Museum of Contemporary Art Africa in daylight to Exterior of Zeitz Museum of Contemporary Art Africa --MB-one (talk) 18:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

• Personally, I still disagree with that notion. But that would mean, arguing against my own case ;-) So, I rather changed the proposed scope. --MB-one (talk) 18:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:04, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Template insertion

Hi MB-one. Could you please explain the reason of this edition (and many similar ones). Duplicating a template in a file uploaded as part of a very specific contest seems pointless and would like to know the reason before removing it. Many thanks into advance --Discasto _talk 17:32, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

@Discasto: Please don't remove them. You can find the reason: here. --MB-one (talk) 07:11, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

I see the discussion and keep on not understanding why (a) images uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth Spain are magically now images uploaded as part of other contest; (b) the misleading template is being placed at the top of the description, so that anyone is misled to believe the image was uploaded as part of this Unesco stuff; (c) the images now labeled are actually not eligible for being used in the new contest (they must be uploaded in June, WLE Spain was run in May). Finally, before messing up the files uploaded as part of WLE Spain (I'm one of the members of WM-ES in charge of the organization and management of the images), shouldn't it be sensible to ask? --Discasto _talk 08:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

@Discasto: The images were uploaded for WLE Spain but, apparently, they are eligible for the other contest too. That's why the second template was inserted. Please ask John Cummings for details of the contest, I'm not involved with the contest or Unesco, but just helping to organize files on Commons. As for the placement of the new template: that's on me. If the placement create any disturbance, please send me a list of affected files, and I can fix it. --MB-one (talk) 08:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

It's not a problem, I can bot the placement of the template. However, according to this, images are not eligible. --Discasto _talk 08:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

@Discasto: If there is no problem for WMES/WLE-ES at this moments, I guess, it would be a good idea to let Unesco/John Cummings decide, what should happen next and not take any action unilaterally.

Cheers --MB-one (talk) 08:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Sure, I'll do it, but mind that it was you the one that took actions uniterally. It's always wise to ask before doing anything. Cheers --Discasto _talk 09:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

@Discasto: The insertion of the additional template was coordinated with John and communicated on Village Pump. No objections were raised and, as you just admitted, other WLE competitions aren't even affected. That's very different from unilateral actions. --MB-one (talk) 09:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Cullinan, Cape Town ( 1050743).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 15:30, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steam Whistle Party Bus 20110613-IMG 3578.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaguar, Techno-Classica 2018, Essen (IMG 9500).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tuning World Bodensee 2018, Friedrichshafen (OW1A1166).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vienna International Airport, Schwechat (P1060383).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 12:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smart, GIMS 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex (1X7A1161).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:49, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kia Ceed, GIMS 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex (1X7A1901).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:35, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeep, Ribnitz-Damgarten ( 1060457).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:52, 19 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:57, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche Boxster Concept, 70 Years Porsche Sports Car, Berlin (1X7A3896).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The guy in the background is a bit disturbing but otherwise good. --Peulle 22:54, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster, IAA 2017, Frankfurt (1Y7A2849).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 01:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ducati 750 Super Sport, Berlin (1X7A3952).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 22:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ABSA Centre, Cape Town (P1050736).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a perspective correction. Not a big fan of the crop (eg car on the corner) but I think it's passable as QI --Trougnouf 22:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC) both  Done --MB-one 13:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality, much better without that rear-view mirror --Trougnouf 20:11, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bitter CD, Techno-Classica 2018, Essen (IMG 9078).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:19, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford Excursion, 12. Internationales Maritimes-Fahrzeugtreffen, Ribnitz-Damgarten ( 1060472).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:06, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Techno-Classica 2018, Essen (IMG 9751).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC) The dark areas should be denoised. --Ermell 19:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)  Done --MB-one 12:58, 14 August 2018 (UTC) Comment No real difference to see. You can also darken the dark parts of the picture further because there is actually not much to see except noise.--Ermell 19:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)  Done --MB-one 13:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LuAZ-967, Pfingsttreffen Puetnitz 2018, Ribnitz-Damgarten (1X7A2822).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boat, 12. Internationales Maritimes-Fahrzeugtreffen, Ribnitz-Damgarten (P1060825).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:56, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GAZ-51, 12. Internationales Maritimes-Fahrzeugtreffen, Ribnitz-Damgarten ( 1060463).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:24, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoda Rapid, Pfingsttreffen Puetnitz 2018, Ribnitz-Damgarten (1X7A2426).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:24, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 911 GT3 RS, GIMS 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex (1X7A0078).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfavorable crop. In addition, the gentlemen in the background I would let disappear in the blur. Both can still be done. -- Spurzem 10:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)  Done cropped towards main subject, blurred and darkened background objects. --MB-one 17:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC) Good quality -- Spurzem 19:56, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

File:2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 10 3.jpg

Hi. I corrected this picture. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:47, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UAZ-469, 12. Internationales Maritimes-Fahrzeugtreffen, Ribnitz-Damgarten (P1060560).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice sharp stitching. --Peulle 16:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KrAZ, 12. Internationales Maritimes-Fahrzeugtreffen, Ribnitz-Damgarten (P1060838).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ribnitzer Hafenfest, Ribnitz-Damgarten (P1060946).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeep, Ribnitz-Damgarten ( 1060459).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:38, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turtle-Pac, AERO 2018, Friedrichshafen (1X7A4477).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:01, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW T-Roc, Friedrichshafen (1X7A4375).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 19:30, 26 August 2018 (UTC)  Comment. I'm not excited. For a good photo, the car is placed very unfavorably. -- Spurzem 22:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeep, Ribnitz-Damgarten ( 1060461).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Bottom crop could be better, but ok overall --Poco a poco 12:55, 25 August 2018 (UTC)  Done --MB-one 15:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LuAZ, Ribnitz-Damgarten (P1060554).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:46, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Praterstern, Vienna ( 1060371).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check for CAs top right. --XRay 18:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bouldern, OutDoor 2018, Friedrichshafen (1X7A9764).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:48, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buddy Bear Reisebaer, Berlin (DSC06496).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:09, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kia Stonic, Kia press conference, IAA 2017, Frankfurt (1Y7A2587).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sailing on Lake Constance (1X7A0002).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 22:19, 26 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Yaay, more sailing boats! :D --Peulle 07:25, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12. Internationales Maritimes-Fahrzeugtreffen, Ribnitz-Damgarten ( 1060600).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garmin, AERO 2018, Friedrichshafen (1X7A4801).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartburg 311, Pfingsttreffen Puetnitz 2018, Ribnitz-Damgarten (1X7A2713).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:31, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaguar I-Pace, GIMS 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex (1X7A1207).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:15, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nissan IMx Kuro, GIMS 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex (1X7A1328).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mazda Vision Coupe Concept, GIMS 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex (1X7A1294).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too much noise (luminosity and chroma) --Poco a poco 18:30, 30 August 2018 (UTC)  Done --MB-one 18:48, 30 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Range Rover Evoque Convertible, Vienna (P1060221).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:16, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Range Rover Evoque Convertible, Vienna (P1060220).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Porsche 959 Rothmans IMG 0677.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porsche 959 Rothmans IMG 0677.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ZIL-157KW, Ribnitz-Damgarten (P1060677).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 19:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KrAZ-255, 12. Internationales Maritimes-Fahrzeugtreffen, Ribnitz-Damgarten ( 1060847).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sailing on Saaler Bodden, Ribnitz-Damgarten (P1060712).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:09, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calypso, Ribnitz-Damgarten (P1060735).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoenix nightliner, IFA 2018, Berlin ( 1070284).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sailing on Lake Constance (1X7A0004).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AERO Friedrichshafen 2018, Friedrichshafen (1X7A4544).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)