User talk:Llez/Archives/2017 (2)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Furcraea foetida (Giant Cabuya), Plant with bulbils.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barranco de Machín, Fuerteventura, lower part, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Obviously useful, but Llez, please explain in your file description what Barranco de Machín is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:24, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Barranco is the Spanish term for a ravine or canyon. Barranco de Machín is therefore the ravine (or canyon or valley) of Machín. (See for example also here, here or here) --Llez (talk) 21:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Napaeus interpunctatus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountains Jandía 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 09:40, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia handiensis - Jandía - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindaconus spurius 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:01, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Punta Jandía - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road to Faro de Punta Jandía.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Village of Pájara, Fuerteventura, Place-name sign.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:02, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 18:52, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus spurius (Alphabet Cone), fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and very good, but please identify it as a fossil in your file description. True, you use the word Pliocene, but adding the word "fossil" or "fossilized" would increase clarity. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:42, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Done --Llez (talk) 07:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Punta Jandía - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine. --Palauenc05 16:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punta de Jandía 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbo petholatus (Tapestry Turban), green form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, really pretty shell. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 23:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Faro Punta de Jandía, Fuerteventura, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:04, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro Punta Pesebre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast Punta Pesebre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis gigantea f. sieboldii 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast Punta Pesebre 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and refreshing! Could you add some water or wave-related category, please? --Basotxerri 15:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)  Done Added to the Category Breaking ocean waves --Llez 18:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC) Thank you, good quality. --Basotxerri 19:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned airfield - Fuerteventura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A picture of nothing! Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis gigantea var. sieboldii (Siebold's Giant Abalone), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, very pretty and high quality. I think this is likely to pass at FPC if nominated there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ardea cinerea - Heidelberg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ardea cinerea - Heidelberg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Cofete - Fuerteventura - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Lacking detail especially on sand and water, sorry --A.Savin 15:58, 13 May 2017 (UTC)  Comment I made a new version from raw file --Llez 16:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC) Significant improvement,  Support --A.Savin 19:25, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street lamp - Roundabout - Morro Jable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:54, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dalechampia aristolochiifolia, inflorescence and bracts.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Napaeus exilis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis kamtschatkana ssp. assimilis (Threaded Abalone), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:23, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - What a fantastic shell and great photography. Slam-dunk FP. I'll put it on my list to nominate and will post it at FPC within a few weeks if you don't do it first. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:41, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis kamtschatkana assimilis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cofete Cemetery - Fuerteventura - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:24, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Cofete - Fuerteventura - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:54, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucha Constante - Juan Miguel Cubas - Morro Jable - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucha Constante - Juan Miguel Cubas - Morro Jable - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis discus discus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:09, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sueños Rotos - Juan Miguel Cubas - Morro Jable - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cofete Cemetery - Fuerteventura - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Traganum moquinii (Moqin's Traganum), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:38, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Traganum moquinii (Moqin's Traganum), leaves.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Most useful at illustrating the leaves. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis discus ssp. discus (Ezo Abalone), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Another great shell picture and probably FP whenever nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabeza de Mujer - Antonina Fathullina - Morro Jable - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sueños Rotos - Juan Miguel Cubas - Morro Jable - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 18:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis laevigata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playing with the wind - Amancio Gonzáles - Morro Jable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabeza de Mujer - Antonina Fathullina - Morro Jable - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis laevigata (Green Lip Abalone), green form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Another great, featurable shell picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxychilus draparnaudi 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:05, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conexión - Desconexión - Petre Petrov - Morro Jable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playing with the wind - Amancio Gonzáles - Morro Jable - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playing with the wind - Amancio Gonzáles - Morro Jable - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a little bit oversharpened. --XRay 08:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture - Morro Jable - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast north of Punta de Capdepera - Majorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oxychilus draparnaudi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:50, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis ovina ssp. ovina (Sheep's Ear Abalone), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:00, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis ovina ovina 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 17:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luz en el Horizonte - Amancio Gonzáles - Morro Jable - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luz en el Horizonte - Amancio Gonzáles - Morro Jable - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pico de la Zarza - summit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pico de la Zarza - summit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turritella leucostoma (Tiger Turret), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turritella attenuata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:04, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turritella attenuata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Rabax63 19:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant Salvador d’Artà 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:21, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tablada de Vinamar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:22, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poblat Talaiòtic de Ses Païsses 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:26, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lighthouse Punta de Capdepera - Mallorca 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 13:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oxychilus alliarius (Garlic Glass-snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Very good and useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:35, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crucibulum spinosum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:49, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poblat Talaiòtic de Ses Païsses 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:49, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coves d’Artà - Rock structure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:11, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crucibulum spinosum (Spiny Cup-and-saucer Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and looks like another likely FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calyptraea helicoidea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karl von Drais memorial Karlsruhe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Happy Birthday to the bike! -- Ikan Kekek 23:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karl von Drais memorial Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calyptraea helicoidea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karl von Drais memorial Karlsruhe 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:04, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poblat Talaiòtic de Ses Païsses 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:12, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angaria nodosa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Angaria nodosa, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:49, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 18:31, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karl von Drais memorial, Karlsruhe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Exactly 200 years ago, Karl von Drais (born in Karlsruhe, Germany, April 29, 1785) made the first ride with his new invention (1817). The bike celebrates its 200th birthday this year! --Llez (talk) 17:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 18:32, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karl von Drais tomb Karlsruhe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:05, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karl von Drais tomb Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:05, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angaria aculeata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poblat Talaiòtic de Ses Païsses 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poblat Talaiòtic de Ses Païsses 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:42, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karl von Drais memorial, Karlsruhe, rear side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment To the founder of bicycle sports in grateful devotion. German Cyclist Association
Exactly 200 years ago, Karl von Drais (born in Karlsruhe, Germany, April 29, 1785) made the first ride with his new invention (1817). The bike celebrates its 200th birthday this year! --Llez (talk) 15:52, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:19, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:56, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dodecatheon meadia (Shooting Star), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dodecatheon meadia (Shooting Star), flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:14, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudotrichia rubiginosa, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Karl Drais, main cemetery, Karlsruhe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Exactly 200 years ago, Karl von Drais (born in Karlsruhe, Germany, April 29, 1785) made the first ride with his new invention (1817). The bike celebrates its 200th birthday this year! --Llez (talk) 14:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:10, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Angaria aculeata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Far de Formentor - Majorca - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:35, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Far de Formentor - Majorca - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polinices albumen (Egg-white Moon Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:52, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cala Barques - Majorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:32, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punta la Nau - Islote Colomer - Majorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:36, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polinices albumen 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poblat Talaiòtic de Ses Païsses 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poblat Talaiòtic de Ses Païsses 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aegopinella nitidula, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:50, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Semicassis bisulcata var. japonica (Japanese Bonnet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock - Cala Barques 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:25, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Molino - Santa Margalida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:29, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunyola - Majorca - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:41, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road Ma-2130 Mallorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:40, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casmaria ponderosa 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:37, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Casmaria ponderosa (Heavy Bonnet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful as a thumbnail, but at larger sizes, the whites look too bright to the extent of being blown out, so you might want to take a look at them and see whether you can make nice adjustments before you nominate this to QIC, if such are your plans. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
  
  •  Done Thanks for the hint --Llez (talk) 15:25, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 18:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embassament de Cúber.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:50, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Semicassis labiata ssp. zeylanica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breg - Brigach - Danube.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henschel 25263 - FKE 262 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henschel 25263 - FKE 262 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zonitoides nitidus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Seems best in scope to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cernina fluctuata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House - Lausheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weilergraben - Blumeggweiler 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cernina fluctuata (Wavy Moon Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fusiturris similis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:07, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fusiturris similis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:17, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support I value it. Commons needs images like these, they're very useful.--Peulle (talk) 12:10, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum citrinum (Queen Mitre), brown form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:13, 21 June 2017 (UTC)  Support Aye. --Peulle (talk) 12:19, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ciconia ciconia - Heidelberg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ciconia ciconia - Heidelberg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vexillum citrinum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:57, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwarzwaldhof-Kreisel - Blumberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 13:41, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Dwellings Unteruhldingen 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aegopinella nitens, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:55, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Guildfordia yoka delicata 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Guildfordia yoka delicata 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polinices candidissimus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polinices candidissimus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polinices cumingianus (Cuming's Moon Snail), white form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:59, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:39, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polinices cumingianus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fundación César Manrique - Stairs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The wall is very white, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 16:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astralium rhodostomum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:54, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astralium rhodostomum (Rosemouth Star Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I agree - having such images with classifications under a Commons license is a useful thing.--Peulle (talk) 15:56, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fundación César Manrique - Red bubble 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:24, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fundación César Manrique - Entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:39, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xeropicta vestalis ssp. joppensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:26, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Yes.--Peulle (talk) 15:58, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polinices aurantius 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:33, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polinices aurantius (Golden Moon Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support a humongous, good, useful picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Seconded.--Peulle (talk) 16:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patella lugubris 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:32, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Patella lugubris, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Peulle (talk) 18:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crepidula arenata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Montaña de la Fuente 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Montaña de la Fuente 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fundación César Manrique, White bubble.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fundación César Manrique, Red bubble.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pila polita 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timanfaya - Lanzarote 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. May be categorization could be better. --XRay 14:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)  Done --Llez 15:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pila polita, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tonna perdix (Partridge Tun), brown form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 07:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tonna perdix 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tutufa oyamai (Oyama's Frog Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good and useful image.--Peulle (talk) 12:44, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:16, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tutufa oyamai 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrenalb abbey - paradise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice church and beautiful image -- Spurzem 17:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crepidula arenata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thylacodes colubrinus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chair - Bettina Scholl-Sabbatini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thylacodes colubrinus (Blackish Worm Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:21, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antirrhinum majus F1 'Rocket Orchid'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great photo and good quality, Tournasol7 08:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Herrenalb Abbey, Paradise, view from west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xerotropis teboudensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:23, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Turbo sarmaticus 01.JPG, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! -- Peulle (talk) 21:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Busycon carica eliceans 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:46, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unglaublich - Eva Roucka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antirrhinum majus F1 'Rocket Orchid' - Begonia ×semperflorens-cultorum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit oversharpened, but quaslity is high for me high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fundación César Manrique - Swimming pool bubble - Living room suite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Busycon carica ssp. eliceans (Kiener's Whelk), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Used and useful.--Peulle (talk) 12:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrenalb abbey - paradise - window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbo sarmaticus (South African Turban), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turbo sarmaticus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, clearly. --Peulle 20:42, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrenalb abbey - paradise - north side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 16:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fasciolaria tulipa (True Tulip), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support There is one serious rival, but this one shows all angles.--Peulle (talk) 22:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomacea paludosa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent work, good FP candidate -- George Chernilevsky 17:04, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Herrenalb - War memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo -- George Chernilevsky 17:06, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fasciolaria tulipa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bufonaria perelegans 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality,--Famberhorst 15:31, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Herrenalb - Schweizerwiese - Fountain - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Neat "glass sculpture". :-) Good quality. --W.carter 20:41, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thylacodes arenarius, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thylacodes arenarius 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:09, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrenalb abbey - paradise - eastern part.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The clouds are a bit overly bright, but overall good enough for QI. --W.carter 22:44, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ebenus cretica (Cretan Ebony), natural stand.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cypraecassis testiculus testiculus (Reticulated Cowry Helmet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cypraecassis testiculus testiculus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:41, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Herrenalb - Schweizerwiese - Fountain - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pila ampullacea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phalium bandatum ssp. bandatum (Banded Bonnet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Luz en el Horizonte - Amancio Gonzáles - Morro Jable - 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Luz en el Horizonte - Amancio Gonzáles - Morro Jable - 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserläufer sich putzend - Atelier Strassacker.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserläufer wachsam - Atelier Strassacker.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotoria grandimaculata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kelletia kelletii 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kelletia kelletii (Kellet's Whelk), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helicophanta vesicalis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helicophanta vesicalis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope and another good FP candidate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:06, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Onoba manzoniana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alvania guancha, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ardea cinerea head - Heidelberg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ardea cinerea head - Heidelberg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manzonia talaverai, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Echinophora spinosa (Prickly Parsnip), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 14:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sermyla riqueti 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 17:01, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manzonia wilmae, brown form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:16, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manzonia wilmae, Two-coloured form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info Besides the brown and the white form, there exists a typical two-coloured form, in which the last half of the last whorl is yellowish --Llez (talk) 16:24, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support 2mm! Wow --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manzonia castanea, bright form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:18, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stenomelania costellaris 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 19:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)ine

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mädchen mit Violine - Rinaldo Bigi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good sharp focus to main object --Michielverbeek 13:39, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stenomelania costellaris, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skulpturenweg Maulbronn - Manuela Tirler - Weed Sphere I, 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manzonia overdiepi, brown form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manzonia lanzarottii, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:52, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skulpturenweg Maulbronn - Andrea Zaumseil - Ohne Titel, 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:19, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skulpturenweg Maulbronn - Werner Pokorny - Haus im Rad, 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There some slight CAs on the upper part of the tree on the right, could you try to remove them, please? --Basotxerri 15:20, 22 August 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint --Llez 16:41, 22 August 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:14, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skulpturenweg Maulbronn - Robert Schad - Dyrill, 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanzarote - La Graciosa - Monaña Clara - Alegranza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think overall the image is OK but it looks a bit oversharpened to me, maybe you could it improve it a bit. --Basotxerri 18:04, 24 August 2017 (UTC)  Done --Llez 18:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manzonia unifasciata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skulpturenweg Maulbronn - Karl Manfred Rennertz - Schwarze Figur, 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa Risco del Paso - Fuertevetura 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stenomelania sobria 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 19:13, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agave filifera 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard - Maulbronn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:48, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gazebo - Maulbronn Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:44, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agave filifera 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 14:58, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stenomelania sobria, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agave filifera (Thread Agave), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:09, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agave filifera 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 10:24, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kameralamt - Maulbronn Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:28, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agave filifera (Thread agave), inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Witch tower - Maulbronn Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:25, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Witch tower - Maulbronn Monastery 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:51, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cingula ugesae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agave filifera (Thread agave), Flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:59, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Witch tower - Maulbronn Monastery 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:00, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manzonia pelorum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:39, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

{subst:vicl

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wall opening - Maulbronn Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granary - Maulbronn Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:34, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arianta arbustorum ssp. alpicola, (Alpine Copse Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:07, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narthex - Maulbronn Monastery 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:20, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfisterei - Maulbronn Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful house and good quality -- Spurzem 10:00, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ridge turret - Maulbronn Monastery 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:09, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narthex - Maulbronn Monastery 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:09, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Setia jansseni, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:38, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faust tower - Maulbronn Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pfisterei, Maulbronn Monastery complex, Germany, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sundial - Maulbronn Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arianta arbustorum alpicola 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:53, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alvania leacocki, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 22:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtyard facade - Maulbronn Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melanoides spec. 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 19:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Faustturm, Maulbronn Monastery, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:50, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western facade of the "lay brothers refectory - Konversengang - church complex", Maulbronn Monastery, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aporrhais uttingeriana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:24, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:51, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aporrhais uttingeriana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:28, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alvania basteriae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 00:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Esperiana daudebartii acicularis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Esperiana daudebartii ssp. acicularis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and best in scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 03:24, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conus striatulus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus striatulus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Botryphallus tuber, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Yes, very useful! Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:46, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alvania watsoni, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theodoxus saulcyi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Narona hirta, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 21:48, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 19:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narona hirta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:28, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarebia lateritia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graveslab M.J.W. Herman- Maulbronn Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metacoceras discoideum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum de Gherdëina - Cymbospondylus Model.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tarebia lateritia, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acteon tornatilis, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:36, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Archaeolepidotus leonardii - Holotype.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Metacoceras discoideum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Does this need the English name after it? Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:17, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment The vernacular name is required if it exists. It is rare for fossils, I know none for the species of this family. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Info As in most ammonites (and also in most of the animals), there exists no vernacular name --Llez (talk) 05:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:53, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silesites vulpes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofel - Summit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Comment Quite unsharp - can You add some sharpness? --Moahim 08:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)  Done --Llez 08:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC) * Comment Now it is too hard, especially in shadows. --Moahim 05:18, 3 October 2017 (UTC)  Done New version from RAW --Llez 08:03, 3 October 2017 (UTC) * Support Now better, and contrast too, but for 300mm images - its better to shot with higher shutter speed, 1/300 and shorter. For this reason You can make ISO 200-400, and aperture 8-9 - it will be enough.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Archaeolepidotus leonardii, Holotype.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 13:05, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trigonaphera bocageana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trigonaphera bocageana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Silesites vulpes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:05, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamulina astieri 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:47, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspa marginata 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macroscaphites tirolensis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very useful and quite good. Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:29, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aspa marginata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:25, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melanoides spec. 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:26, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cappella di San Maurizio - Passo Gardena - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tornatellaea simulata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gran Cir 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pulchellia provincialis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cappella di San Maurizio, Passo Gardena, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Nice image, useful and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 15:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fissurella natalensis (Natal Keyhole Limpet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hamulina astieri.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 16:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gran Cir, Dolomites, view from South.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used; beautiful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 16:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dantercepies aerial cableway, Upper terminus, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus sponsalis (Marriage Cone), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:20, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Discus rotundatus (Rotund Disc), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:16, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tritia colorata ssp. vindobonensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ethalia guamensis (Guam Button Top Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:46, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ethalia guamensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sassongher - Dolomites.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 16:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colfosco - Sass da Ciampac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice -- Sixflashphoto 16:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cymbospondylus spec., Seceda specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info For detailed data and original description see here. As the head is not known, the exact species is not identifiable (Info by the Museum).

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plans aerial lift, Calfosch, red gondola.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acteon tornatilis forma unicolor (Unicoloured Lathe Acteon), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very nice example! Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acteon tornatilis f. unicolor 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really good, a possible FP. -- Ikan Kekek 22:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val de Fodom - Sella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheep - Corvara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xeroleuca gouliminensis depressa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FS R.410.004 - Val Gardena railway 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 13:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FS R.410.004 - Val Gardena railway 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 13:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col Alt - Corvara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tritia colorata vindobonensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 11:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sassongher, Dolomites, view from south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 19:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - High altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi Nave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xeroleuca gouliminensis ssp. depressa (shell).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 21:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - left side altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Thomas Ledl 14:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - right side altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 14:44, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
FS R.410.004, Val Gardena railway, restored, back and right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Up to now best in scope but very distorted. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 15:36, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
   Comment No chance to go further back, sorry --Llez (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC) }

Sometimes it is a problem indeed and it is a pity. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 17:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
FS R.410.004, Val Gardena railway, restored, front and left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Up to now the best in scope though the image is very distorted. Why did you use such a short lens? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 15:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
   Comment No chance to go further back, sorry --Llez (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC) }

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Architectonica plicata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church St. Ulrich, Urtijëi, South Tyrol, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:24, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - St. Ulrich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:42, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Turbo petholatus 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Turbo petholatus 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - Baptismal font.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church St. Ulrich, Urtijëi, Southt Tyrol, nave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good picture and scope does not compete with the numerous VI's from Parish church St. Ulrich --Capricorn4049 (talk) 12:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tritia corniculum var. minor, spotted form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church St. Ulrich, Urtijëi, Southt Tyrol, high altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Scope ist too similar to Commons:Valued image candidates/Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi Nave.jpg. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 12:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment, this is a different image with a more specific scope, so ok for me - it is a stunning church interior. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I give up. I will not disturb your project anymore. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 11:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Question Other opinions? --Llez (talk) 15:27, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per DeFacto. When you are talking about thumbnails to be inserted into online articles, the fact that this is a closer-in view of the altar matters and is worth a second scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support If the frame had removed the top 1/3 of the image, the scope would be even less questionable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Per others. --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church St. Ulrich, Urtijëi, Southt Tyrol, left side altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church St. Ulrich, Urtijëi, Southt Tyrol, right side altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - Sacred Heart chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The top window is a bit problematic, but the rest of the picture is very nice to me.--Famberhorst 15:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - St. Florian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 15:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - St. Elisabeth group.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes, now seems better. --Aeou 19:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tritia corniculum var. minor, brown form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Yes.--Peulle (talk) 22:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church St. Ulrich, Urtijëi, Southt Tyrol, Sacred Heart Chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:57, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church St. Ulrich, Urtijëi, Southt Tyrol, Our Lady of the Rosary Chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - St.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks better now, QI --Poco a poco 18:48, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - King David.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - Organ loft.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oversharpened --Michielverbeek 14:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC) I uploaded a new version from raw files --Llez 16:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC) Indeed and from this one the quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 17:59, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - Church pew.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Short DoF, IMO OK in this case. --Basotxerri 15:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monachoides incarnatus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:17, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gibbula fanulum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Cyclists - Urtijëi.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclists - Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Madonna with angels - Urtijëi.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madonna with angels - Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:53, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monachoides incarnatus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue House - Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:47, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church St. Ulrich, Urtijëi, Southt Tyrol, Pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:19, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Luis Trenker Memorial - Urtijëi.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Luis Trenker Memorial, Urtijëi, South Tyrol.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Resciesa - View from Seceda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 12:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zillertal Alps - View from Seceda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The snowy peaks are beautiful. The foreground is dark and less sharp, but good for me.--Famberhorst 16:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Sundial - Cësa Mauroner - Urtijëi.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sundial - Cësa Mauroner - Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too bad shadow right top but good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jujubinus baudoni, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:49, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpe di Siusi - View from Seceda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stomatella impertusa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes. --Peulle 17:07, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forcella del Pana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:36, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seceda aerial lift - gondola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Spot on the top right, and please add personality rights warning.--Peulle 15:34, 3 November 2017 (UTC)  Done --Llez 16:50, 3 November 2017 (UTC) OK --Peulle 23:52, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stomatella impertusa (Strigose Stomatella), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - Pulpit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 23:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trenker family grave - Urtijëi - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 13:10, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seceda - Panorama S-W-N-E.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting. But I found 3 stitching problems to be solved (see notes). The horizon is slightly tilted to the right. You show more sky than I would prefer, but the cross and the nice clouds justify that. --Milseburg 19:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)  Done I made a new stitch, all errors are removed. Yes, the cross causes the large amount of the sky, I think it is balanced a bit by the mountains on the right --Llez 21:32, 2 November 2017 (UTC) Better now. I sent you a message on the File talk. --Milseburg 23:51, 2 November 2017 (UTC) See answer on the File talk --Llez 06:28, 3 November 2017 (UTC) Weak support The alignment of the horizon doesn´t fit 100% to reality yet (see link in file talk), but I think the image is good enough for QI. --Milseburg 12:01, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xerosecta mogadorensis ssp. fusca, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obornella laevigata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:42, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cemetery - Urtijëi - new part.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:22, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trenker memorial plaque - Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --SKas 18:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Obornella laevigata, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

 Question - Llez, isn't this a fossil? It looks like stone. If it's a fossil, that should be in the scope and the file description, don't you think? [Edit: I now see it's among the categories, but I don't think that's enough.] -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:11, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

It is in the description. Bajocian is period of the Jurassic, about 170 million year ago. So it was self-evedent for me, that it is a fossil shell. I added "fossil" to the scope. --Llez (talk) 18:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

I'm familiar with the Jurassic but haven't heard of Bajocian. I see that you have that linked, though, so that's fine.  Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grave of the family Trenker, Urtijëi, South Tyrol.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antony - Urtijëi -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stomatia phymotis (Swollen Stomatella), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:57, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial plaque for Luis and Hilda Trenker, cemetery of Urtijëi, South Tyrol.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used, best in scope. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:57, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antony - Urtijëi - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentAre there several dead pixels in the image? --Granada 18:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)  Done Yes, you are right. I hope I found them all --Llez 18:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC) Good work in an overall difficult lighting situation inside that church! Well done in post (raising shadows, lowering lights), it's just too bad that it isn't tack sharp up to the corners, but that's a tough job with reasonably priced lenses (I wish I had a really sharp super wide angle lens) --Granada 08:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cemetery - Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are two spots on your image, could you check them, please? (see notes) --Basotxerri 21:33, 6 November 2017 (UTC)  Done --Llez 18:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC) Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:50, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antony - Urtijëi - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:55, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Antony, Urtijëi, South Tyrol, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antony - Urtijëi - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antony - Urtijëi - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antony - Urtijëi - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ethalia catharinae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Antony, Urtijëi, South Tyrol, main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Antony, Urtijëi, South Tyrol, pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:44, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antony - Urtijëi - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antony - Urtijëi - 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antony - Urtijëi - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antony - Urtijëi - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Antony, Urtijëi, South Tyrol, left side altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:50, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Antony, Urtijëi, South Tyrol, right side altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xerosecta castriesi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 06:26, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Antony, Urtijëi, South Tyrol, gallery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:11, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phorcus richardi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phorcus richardi 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antony - Urtijëi - 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antony - Urtijëi - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antony - Urtijëi - 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo, verticals well done, a FP? --Michielverbeek 17:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House - Urtijëi - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a spot in the sky (insect, bird); not a big problem but I would remove it. Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC)  Done --Llez 17:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gibbula benzi 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puez Group in clouds.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:01, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House - Urtijëi - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:01, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urtijëi - Seiser Alm aerial lift - gondola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There is a dustspot in the lower right corner near the cable. --Berthold Werner 17:04, 15 November 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Llez 19:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Good quality now.. --Berthold Werner 11:31, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Cassiano Formation - Sella Pass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The picture is a bit dark, but good quality.--Famberhorst 16:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Architectonica perdix (Partridge Sundial), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:St. Antony - Urtijëi - 14.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St. Antony - Urtijëi - 14.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xerosecta edrissiana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 17:34, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Architectonica perdix 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:22, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofel - Puez - Sella - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)