User talk:Livioandronico2013/Archive/2014

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Livioandronico2013!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:50, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San paolo ,basilica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe it would be better if it was less exposed, but considering the bright colours of the subject, I guess it is QI. --Stegop 23:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statua Giuseppe Mazzini aventino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 20:23, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gioacchino belli.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Σπάρτακος 07:28, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Paul,Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The scope must not contain model only category where the image is placed --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 25 July 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 (talk) 07:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:04, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco Quartiere coppedè.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, let's let it pass --Poco a poco 19:37, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lampadario Quartiere coppedè.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The scope is too wide I suggest: [[:Category:Wrought iron in Rome|Lampadario Quartiere coppedè]] --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 Done Thanks for review --LivioAndronico talk 06:49, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:26, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Targa Cecilia Metella.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:11, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Titulus cecilia metella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The image is very bright.--XRay 08:50, 3 August 2014 (UTC) Done Now? Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 09:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC)  Support OK.--XRay 10:15, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Nicola a Capo di Bove (Rome).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Tilt and perspective, correction necessary. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Done see now. Thanks for review --LivioAndronico talk 07:10, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:38, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Titulus cecilia metella.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Problem of color temperature. Easy to fix. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Done see now. Thanks for review --LivioAndronico talk 07:10, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:34, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:33, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate on the ancient Via Appia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mask 2 on the ancient Via Appia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:18, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mash on the ancient Via Appia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Idontfindaoriginalname 13:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Appian Way.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:51, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Hola.

Hola Livioandronico. Te hablo en español porque en inglés me resultaría imposible y he visto que algo (o bastante) entiendes. Intentaré hacer oraciones no muy complicadas. Por cierto, entiendo aceptablemente el italiano, aunque, con frecuencia, necesito ayuda de un traductor automático. Si me hablan despacio, lo entiendo casi todo.

Las últimas versiones de la imagen File:Medieval windows of Mausoleum of Cecilia Metella.jpg están mucho peor que la segunda. Puedes ver y bajar (download) la segunda imagen aquí].

Te digo esto por si has perdido esa versión de la imagen al haberla trabajado.

Cuando trabajas un jpg y lo guardas, pierdes calidad porque comprimes el fichero. Si lo vuelves a hacer, pierdes más. Los cambios, además, no se pueden volver atrás. Es conveniente guardar una copia del archivo original. No pasa esto si usas programas de edición como Lightroom, pero si con Gimp o Photoshop.

Espero que te sirva de ayuda.

Voy a intentar trabajar yo tu foto, espero que te guste. En caso de no gustarte, no pasa nada. Si la trabajo, no puedo votar--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 12:09, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

gracias, muy agradable --LivioAndronico talk 12:36, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

He subido una nueva versión. No es perfecta. Por lo menos, las líneas verticales y horizontales están rectas. La ventana está en el centro. Si no te gusta, puedes revertir a cualquiera de las versiones anteriores en la misma página de la foto, Fíjate en el apartado "File history" y en la palabra "revert".

Por cierto, entiendo perfectamente la expresión "muy agradable", pero en español se dice "muy amable", pero es un error menor, se entiende--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 12:50, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Es mucho mejor, gracias :) --LivioAndronico talk 12:56, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 20:22, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

thanks to you, tomorrow is my birthday :) --LivioAndronico talk 20:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria Ausiliatrice (Rome).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:06, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:29, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancient Roman theatre (Ostia Antica).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment IMO the Category shoul be Ancient Roman theatre (Ostia Antica) --P e z i (talk) 18:11, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Done thanks for review --LivioAndronico talk 21:19, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 13:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:29, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Pictures in VI

Look what you can do. The future of your images is often linked to the quality of the caption, good day. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Understood --LivioAndronico talk 23:07, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lake Nemi,S-W view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Nice picture, LivioAndronico, but can you add "NW (or SE...) view" to the scope, as we usually do here -- except for buildings or sites that can be seen (and photographed) from only one point of view ? Thanks in advance. Friendly. --JLPC (talk) 18:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks for review --LivioAndronico talk 20:26, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:02, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lake Albano,South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Nice picture, LivioAndronico, but can you add "NW (or SE...) view" to the scope, as we usually do here -- except for buildings or sites that can be seen (and photographed) from only one point of view ? Thanks in advance. Friendly. --JLPC (talk) 18:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks for review --LivioAndronico talk 20:26, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:03, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woman in Todi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vespa a Todi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI: Nice photo, good colours. -- Spurzem 09:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Appia Antica (Rome), near Casal Rotondo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The caption is a bit low. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Good now? thanks for review --LivioAndronico talk 06:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Useful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Street signs in Rome,Appian Way.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The caption is a bit low. You can not propposer two very different images with the same scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

•  CommentYes,you have right,i have changed the scope,thanks for review --LivioAndronico talk 06:24, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
• The scope seems too wide --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:33, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Ok in this way? Thanks for review --LivioAndronico talk 12:11, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support acceptable --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:34, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Todi panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Florstein 15:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Man in Todi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval windows of Mausoleum of Cecilia Metella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Fortunato,Todi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice atmosphere, QI for me despite one detail (see note, easy to fix). --JLPC 16:03, 13 August 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 16:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Todi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now. --JLPC 07:20, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate in Todi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Will be QI after correcting the clockwise tilt. --Cccefalon 05:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 07:23, 15 August 2014 (UTC) ok --Cccefalon 19:09, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval windows in Todi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice texture. --Slaunger 20:40, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angels on the Church of Saint Susanna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa susanna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coat of arms of the Vatican in todi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo dei Priori (Todi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:58, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa susanna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:44, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion in Todi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eagle of Todi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:46, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Riguardo all'educazione

Ciao, Livio. Mi permetto di spostare qui sotto una parte della discussione da Commons:Valued image candidates/Trickle-bed reactor.svg:

@LivioAndronico: Please be calm, educated, and speak in English (we are not on it.wikipedia). Thank you. --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 22:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

@Daniele Pugliesi:Sarebbe educato se non ci facessi perdere tutto questo tempo per fare una cosa cosi semplice oltretutto sono qui da molto piu tempo di te e so dove mi trovo, inoltre ti ho scritto in italiano visto la "tua calma" è lentezza e nient'altro e comunque ho scritto anche in inglese prova a rileggere. E sii più educato con chi cerca di aiutarti, clear? Thanks. --LivioAndronico talk 00:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Avrei dovuto risponderti già dall'inizio in privato. Riporto di seguito le mie considerazioni, alle quali se vuoi puoi replicare nella mia pagina di discussione:

• Mi risulta che sei iscritto dal 2013, quindi non so a cosa ti riferisci quando dici "oltretutto sono qui da molto piu tempo di te".
• Continui a scrivere in italiano e penso che sia una mancanza di rispetto non nei miei confronti, ma nei confronti degli altri che leggono la discussione e nel 90% dei casi non sanno parlano italiano. Comunque, ho spostato la discussione quindi adesso possiamo parlare pure dialetto (infatti "A Daniè" mi sembra un'espressione del sud).
• Riguardo all'educazione, siamo soliti chiamarci per nome su Wikipedia e a darci del tu, e fin qui va bene, ma passare a chiamare "A Daniè" qualcuno che non hai mai visto di presenza non ti sembra a dir poco fuori luogo?
• Penso che in generale la mancanza di educazione sia un problema di quasi tutti gli italiani. Se hai abitato all'estero te ne sarei reso conto. --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 14:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Si risponde nelle pagine di dicussione dell'utente dove si scrive tanto per cominciare.Sono iscritto su wiki dal 2006 non ho mai detto con questo nick.Altri utenti parlano anche in tedesco,se fossi più assiduo sarebbe meglio anche per la tua cultura."A Daniè" è un'espressione di Roma e allora ? che c'entra del sud o nord? Hai un cognome meridionale come credo tu possa verificare anche da solo, e allora? E poi,no,non mi sembra fuori luogo,il mondo è bello perchè è vario Daniè.Inoltre delle statistiche sull'educazione degli italiani non mi importa niente,perchè mi proponi tuoi ragionamenti personali? Che oltretutto disapprovo. Detto questo (e non sò ancora a cosa serva questo intervento) i don't care what you think,in this way is more elegant? Bye --LivioAndronico talk 19:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Non condivido il tuo punto di vista ma lo accetto: non è mia intenzione cambiare le persone, per cui chiamami come vuoi, ma sappi che preferirei essere chiamato con il mio nome: penso che i diminutivi vadano bene solo con le persone che si conosce da tempo. Molto più importante, suppongo che non ci sia nessuno su Commons che conosce tutte le procedure e anche se tu ne sapessi di più, ciò non ti autorizza a sminuire chi non ne sa di meno. Se poi non vuoi leggere o seguire i miei suggerimenti, fa di testa tua: neanch'io ho tempo da perdere e anch'io tendo a farmi un'impressione delle persone basandomi su pochi fatti; tra l'altro, mi trovi di cattivissimo umore, quindi non ha senso continuare parlarne. --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 22:59, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

chi non ne sa di meno? Al massimo "chi ne sa di meno"....cmq errare è umano ma perseverare è diabolico.Abbiamo capito, anche se non me ne frega niente del tuo umore, chiudi e stop e siamo tutti più felici. --LivioAndronico talk 23:14, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanile Chiesa Madre Sava.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 09:56, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Todi, West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 21:58, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vespa 50 Elestart.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The scope is too broad. We must put the type of Vespa in the scope, and put the image in the right category. This image can not represent itself every existing model of Vespa. :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:43, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

I've found the perfect model specific, thanks --LivioAndronico talk 08:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 21:59, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Antonio 2 - manduria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps what about sharpness, but nice.--Famberhorst 15:43, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parrocchia San Paolo della Croce Plate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosone S. Antonio - Manduria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment : a more symmetrical cut would be better and QI, imo. --JLPC 21:50, 25 August 2014 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks for review. --Livioandronico2013 07:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC) Good quality now. --JLPC 14:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'antonio window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Antonio inside - Manduria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite noisy, and the windows are too bright --Uoaei1 15:29, 27 August 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review. --Livioandronico2013 19:17, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Much better, thanks. --Uoaei1 20:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statua San Antonio 3 - manduria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Only a small problem (imo), easy to fix (see note, please). --JLPC 15:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)  Done Merci.--Livioandronico2013 19:08, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statua San Antonio 2 - manduria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better --Poco a poco 19:46, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of the cathedral of Oria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 17:55, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient symbol of Oria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 02:56, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient plate in Oria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Thanks for review. --Livioandronico2013 01:48, 29 August 2014 (UTC) Better now. --JLPC 08:54, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Barsanofio in Oria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:13, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Name of plant.

Best Livio Andronico, Presumably it is a Cistus cultivar, but I'm not sure. Sincerely,--Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manduria,Chiesa San Antonio,South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate of wind in St. Peter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 21:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Symbol and statues in St. Peter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:10, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eagle in Roma2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:25, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eagle in Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:25, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate on the Porta degli ebrei in Oria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI now, you could have kept the portrait format though, important was only the tight crop at the top and bottom. Much better now. --Poco a poco 13:50, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Base of the Vatican obelisk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments poor categorization --A.Savin 12:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 13:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC) Sorry no, as long as there is redundancy, the categorization remains poor. I know that it's a wiki, but without my comment straight here you will probably never know the guideline. --A.Savin 14:53, 2 September 2014 (UTC)  (I think) done When criticism is constructive that can not be accepted, I'm here to learn and I thank you. I think it goes well (let me know if I'm wrong). Thanks again. --Livioandronico2013 15:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC) OK --A.Savin 11:49, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Foto del emperador romano

He subido una nueva versión de la foto creando un archivo diferente (File:Constantine the Great in Oria (Retouched).jpg). De esta manera no borro tu versión, por si te gusta más.

La he propuesto en QI Candidates. Yo no puedo votar por haber participado en su creación.

A mí me gusta más, pero... ya nos dirán--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 18:17, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Me ha llevado casi una hora. Hasta he pintado un poco de cielo para que hubiese algo más de espacio por encima--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 18:21, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Por cierto, cuando hagas una foto como esta, intenta que lo más enfocado sea la cara de la estatua. Creo que el mayor defecto es que no es lo mejor enfocado de la foto--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 18:25, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Una cosa más, si haces las imágenes en formato RAW, en vez de JPG, son más fáciles de trabajar. Ojo, después hay que pasarlas a JPG, necesitas un programa especial para trabajarlas como Lightroom 5--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 18:31, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

He cometido un error en los datos EXIF que aparecen al final de la foto. He escrito mi nombre. Ha sido sin querer. No sé retirarlo. Para retirarlo tendría que volver a empezar de nuevo. Espero que no te importe. Disculpa--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 18:33, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

No puedo decir gracias, sin embargo tengo la raw ... Olvidé --LivioAndronico talk 20:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Quizás sea un problema de lenguaje. Cuando dices "No puedo decir gracias" entiendo que estás disgustado. ¿Deseas que proponga la foto para que sea borrada por los datos EXIF (o por otro motivo)? Es posible borrarla por causa de los datos EXIF--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:58, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

sin perdón, quise decir que yo no puedo hacer otra cosa que darle las gracias,mi español consigue un poco asqueroso --LivioAndronico talk 21:01, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

De acuerdo, gracias a ti. Ayudarte me permite sentirme útil. Es tanto mérito tuyo como mío.

Acabo de editar en File talk:Constantine the Great in Oria (Retouched).jpg para expresar con claridad que tú eres el autor de la foto y que yo no tengo ningún derecho de autoría--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Por cierto, la foto original es buena. Yo no la habría intentado trabajar si pensase que la foto original no era una buena foto. No estaba seguro de poderla mejorar. Le he dedicado tiempo porque la foto lo merece. El mérito es, sobre todo, tuyo--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:21, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Gracias, espero mejorar --LivioAndronico talk 21:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

He solucionado lo de los datos EXIF subiendo una nueva foto (File:Constantine the Great in Oria (Retouched).jpg) He propuesto la anterior para borrado rápido por ser un duplicado.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:51, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Gracias --LivioAndronico talk 22:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of S. Antonio Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 19:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Categorization

Hi Livioandronico2013.

As an old regular in QIC, I've noticed that you have often lot of problems in categorization and description of almost all your images. I highly recommend you to read our guidelines here in QIC, and to became more precise in the categories (and descriptions) of your photographs. Recently, you uploaded a relief of the CoA of Rome, with the famous cross and SPQR, plus a "fascio". You categorized it both in "fascism in Italy", and in "Vatican city", that is simply impossible. Of course, you know that there cannot be found any fascist symbol inside of the Vatican city, which is an independent country since 1929... Your geolocalization was also wrong. And it is only one example among a lot of others.

Do you know that a wrong, or not precise enough, categorization or description, is enough for an "oppose" vote in QIC ? I thank you very much for sharing with us so interesting pictures of Rome, a marvelous city, but remember the goal of "Commons", which is not only a simple gallery of picture.

If you don't categorize at the good level, your picture will be useless, because nobody will find it in all our collections ! (please, see the categories and the subcategories of the Obelisk at Piazza San Pietro...), or have a look to my gallery of pictures from Rome or from Vatican City, if not perfect, I think you will find good ideas for descriptions and/or categories. Remember this: The more you categorize, the more your image may be seen by other users.

I hope it helps. In case of need, don't hesitate in asking questions ! Cheers and good luck for your candidacies !--Jebulon (talk) 14:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice, I will try to improve and change what wrong, however, the picture of the beam and is spqr port angelica in the Vatican you can see it here [1], hello and thank you. --LivioAndronico talk 15:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

The Porta Angelica is just at the border, but is not inside of the City of Vatican...--Jebulon (talk) 20:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

We're now watching the meter ..... Joke --LivioAndronico talk 20:27, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Meters make the difference, especialy in this case ;)--Jebulon (talk) 19:15, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Face in Quartiere Coppedè.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:36, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate in Todi for 11 September 2001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Geo position would by nice. --XRay 16:38, 4 September 2014 (UTC)  DoneI'm sorry,you are right. --Livioandronico2013 20:21, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statua San Antonio - manduria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Passable I guess. --Mattbuck 21:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yellow Palace in Quartiere Coppedè.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:20, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winged lion in Quartiere Coppedè.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:59, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion in Coppedè 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can pass as QI IMO. --Cccefalon 06:35, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decoration in the Quartiere Coppedè.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hamster28 05:02, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimera in quartiere coppedè.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:16, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of the fountain of frogs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (DoF could be better, but IMO it's still QI.) --XRay 15:16, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Constantine the Great in Oria (Retouched).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

{{QICpromoted|File:Plate_S.P.Q.R._in_Vatican.jpg|Plate S.P.Q.R. in Porta Angelica,Vatican --Livioandronico2013 07:47, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 Comment The picture is good for me but it would be good to have a better indication of the location (type and name of building, geotag). Thanks --Moroder 07:36, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 08:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for correcting the geotag but I don't see any improvement in the description --~~~~
 Comment I entered "Porta Angelica", more than that honestly do not know what to put --Livioandronico2013 13:11, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uggiano Montefusco.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo. --ArildV 21:02, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace in quartiere coppedè.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vatican obelisk, East view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion in Barberini Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:54, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buste of Francesco Barberini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support QI IMO, but a bit of noise--Lmbuga 01:19, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buste of Pope Urban VIII.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buste of Card. Antonio Barberini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:15, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Il trionfo della Divina Provvidenza,Palazzo Barberini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:57, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Caption

The lifespan of an image in wiki is directly related to the quality of the caption. Care of your captions. :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes thank you and sorry --LivioAndronico talk 08:11, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine of Palazzo Barberini (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 00:08, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Gigant Palazzo Barberini2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 22:39, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church tower of uggiano montefusco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Bgag 14:56, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Gigant Palazzo Barberini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --JLPC 16:53, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbazia di San Cassiano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:31, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The pope at the windows in St. Peter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:15, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vatican Obelisk 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better, y de nada :) --Poco a poco 23:28, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chandelier in St. Peter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:38, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Barberini fresco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Barrel distortion visible on the long edges. What is the size of this fresco? --Uoaei1 06:15, 11 September 2014 (UTC)  Done I don't know the size, I didn't have a meter with me --Livioandronico2013 08:06, 11 September 2014 (UTC) Ok now. And I am just curious for your estimation --Uoaei1 06:15, 12 September 2014 (UTC) I'm joke, i don't know the misure but was very big....i think type 8x3 meters, thank you --Livioandronico2013 08:26, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flaminio obelisk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The descr. needs to be expanded. --Cayambe 21:32, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Piazza del Popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo --Lewis Hulbert 17:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Barberini Ceiling by Pietro da Cortona.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eagle in Villa Borghese.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:15, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana del Nettuno, Piazza del Popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:41, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of St. Paul on Porta del Popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:41, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of St. Peter on Porta del Popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PJDespa 10:40, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate in Piazza del popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 10:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in Piazza del Popolo4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 10:07, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Symbol of the Barberini family with children.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of Dea Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statues on Fontana dell'Acqua Felice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please identify the CoA and categorize properly.--Jebulon 22:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review. --Livioandronico2013 20:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC) Jebulon can you check now? Thanks --Livioandronico2013 08:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC) Needs a crop at right for symmetry, but good for QI. Please look at the new categories ! --Jebulon 11:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)  Done and ok boss --Livioandronico2013 20:11, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statues on the colonnades of Saint Peter's Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but needs a little bit perspective enhancement: It is slightly rotated cw and the left side is leaning in. See my notes. --Cccefalon 11:21, 13 September 2014 (UTC)  Done Better? Danke for review. --Livioandronico2013 14:35, 13 September 2014 (UTC)  Comment Unfortunately not, the left side is still leaning in. I am not sure, if perhaps your software has limitations about handling this. I downloaded your image and corrected it with Adobe Lightroom. You can see the result here (smaller resolution than the original), giving you an idea, that it is not a problem with the image. Want to give it another try? --Cccefalon 19:28, 13 September 2014 (UTC)  Done See now. Thanks . --Livioandronico2013 20:11, 13 September 2014 (UTC) @Livioandronico2013: I would love to. However, I think, you forgot to upload the new version --Cccefalon 04:57, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Excuse me Cccefalon,now? --Livioandronico2013 09:53, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Cccefalon can you check now? Thanks --Livioandronico2013 08:25, 18 September 2014 (UTC) You bypassed the challenge. But I like the result. Good for QI IMO. --Cccefalon 11:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC) Unfortunately, I'm lazy :D --Livioandronico2013 20:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sarcophagus of Beautiful Galiana in Viterbo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:30, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate in Piazza del popolo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:25, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion in piazza del popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not sure whether this WB is closer to reality but the overexposure is acceptable now --Poco a poco 09:05, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Beautiful Galiana in Viterbo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Porsche 914

Hallo Livioandronico, you find that the flowers at the border of the road on my photo of Porsche 914 are disturbing. But don't you think that this view is too harsh? This morning I saw legs beside of a BMW i8 on an image which was protected. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello Lothar, infact I haven't declined, and also did not say it was a mistake, I just asked for an "adjustment". However, it may even go --LivioAndronico talk 11:47, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

CoA

Hi Livioandronico2013

Thanks for using french, I'll answer in english.

CoA means "Coats of Arms" (stemme), and according to the guidelines of the QIC, you have to categorize your pictures at a relevant level. "Vatican city" is not the good category for this picture. If you take care a little, you will find a special category for this "stemme". As I told you already, you may use many other category, in order to make your picture more visible. Hunting for the QI seal only is just useless, and you will not obtain it if you don't follow the guidelines ! Have a nice evening .--Jebulon (talk) 20:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jebulon, I'm not classified as "Vatican City," but as the Acqua Felice Fontana (Rome)and I believe that is correct . Anyway i found a good Coa,Merci.--LivioAndronico talk 20:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I was confusing with the Medici one (not centered). Interesting quiz: why the fountain is named "Acqua Felice" ? The answer is inside of an another question : what was the real name of the owner of the stemme, pope Sixtus V ? Funny, isn't it ? ;)) ! --Jebulon (talk) 21:10, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

In rome everything comes from the name of someone like the Via Appia (Appius Claudius) Via Aurelia (Aurelio) the aqueduct Alessandrino (Alexander severe), etc. .. :) --LivioAndronico talk 21:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I know Rome, and I love this city very much !--Jebulon (talk) 22:40, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flaminio obelisk (Rome),south-east view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Not a good idea ...

... to do this before getting the QI certificate. Better wait, until it was assessed. For now it is only a candidate for QI and other people still can object. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:16, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

yes you right ,i do only for don't forget :D .Ok i stop it. :P --LivioAndronico talk 19:24, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Good for peace and wellbeing among the photographers community --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:45, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell tower of San Lorenzo outside the walls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not quite perfect but good enough imo given the large resolution --DXR 21:16, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue on column san lorenzo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 10:23, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate on column san lorenzo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 10:25, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue 3 in front of Campo Verano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:25, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue 1 in front of Campo Verano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment : Very slightly leaning to the left imo. --JLPC 08:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 15:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC) Better now. --JLPC 18:25, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate in Viterbo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:05, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vatican Plates in Viterbo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentQI for me when the perspective is corrected on the right. --JLPC 15:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 19:44, 17 September 2014 (UTC) Better now.--JLPC 08:07, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unesco plate in Viterbo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:30, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arch of Santa Rosa in Viterbo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:30, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statues on St.peter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:46, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chandelier in St. Peter3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Still halos, but IMO acceptable. --XRay 16:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosaic of Virgin Mary in St. Peter's Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:43, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Face of ogre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose window of Church of St Mary Immaculate and St. John Berchmans.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower bell of Church of St Mary Immaculate and St. John Berchmans.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:23, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop on bottom is quite tight, but ok --Uoaei1 15:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine near Porta del Popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cross on the Church of St Mary Immaculate and St. John Berchmans.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think perspective needs to be corrected (raws of bricks). --JLPC 18:58, 21 September 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 19:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC) JLPC can you check now? Thanks --Livioandronico2013 21:22, 23 September 2014 (UTC) OK now.--JLPC 14:27, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inscription on the Vatican obelisk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC) A translation could be helpful...--Jebulon 10:25, 4 September 2014 (UTC) I don't know latin :P --Livioandronico2013 12:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate on fontaine near Porta del Popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell Tower of Basilica of Santa Maria del Popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:25, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dea Roma in piazza del popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 20:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eagles In Quartiere Coppedè.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:59, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Pictures

Hi! There are two pictures of Notre-Dame-de-Lorette, and this one is not nominated.--Paris 16 (talk) 23:21, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi, ok but there was 2, anyway the date is already 27, thanks --LivioAndronico talk 23:27, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain vermicino of Luigi Vanvitelli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Face on the Fountain vermicino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:17, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate on the Fountain vermicino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion in Piazza del Popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Denoising borderline + two small problems (see nots please). --JLPC 09:47, 26 September 2014 (UTC)  Done Ops,Merci JLPC --Livioandronico2013 11:31, 26 September 2014 (UTC) OK now. --JLPC 15:55, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neptun in Fontana del Nettuno,Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate near ponte Sisto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:05, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate of Piazza Navona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana dell'Acqua Felice, statue of Moses.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonnade of St. Peter and sky.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Pleclown 11:21, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madonna in piazza Farnese.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great Synagogue of Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Menorah and Tables of the Law on Great Synagogue (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Turtle Fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great Synagogue of Rome,front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:17, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Symbol in Viterbo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moor Fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:25, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gideon on niche of Fontana dell'Acqua Felice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The river Ganges by Gianlorenzo Bernini (1651), from the Fontana dei Quattro Fiumi in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obelisk in piazza Navona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jesus in Palazzo Barberini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The judgment of God.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion in Fontana dell'acqua Felice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The nile in the Fountain of the Four Rivers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you enhance the perspective to get the verticals rectilinear? --Cccefalon 06:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 10:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid in the fountain of neptune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in the garden of Palace of Caserta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fontana dell'Acqua Felice,Moses.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : I'm not sure your scope is OK : the picture shows only a part of the fpountain. --JLPC (talk) 16:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Is the principal statue of the fontaine.What can be better for you? --LivioAndronico talk 20:18, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Small distortion problem. We must expand the image height, poor Moses looks like a dwarf of the mine. :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment No,no is real in this way :"the statue, as it intends to refer to models of Michelangelo, is stocky and emphatic, as to be baptized by the Romans the "ridiculous Moses" --LivioAndronico talk 06:41, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support oops sorry. It is very special. Thank you for explanation --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Uggiano Montefusco, Via Chiesa,east view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : I think it would be better to add the street name to the scope (SP 135 according to GeoLocator ?). Thanks in advance. --JLPC (talk) 10:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment In this way? Thanks --LivioAndronico talk 10:52, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

 Support : OK now. --JLPC (talk) 16:44, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obelisk in Piazza Navona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neptun in Fontana del Nettuno,Roma (Front view).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in the garden of Palace of Caserta2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in the garden of Palace of Caserta4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in the garden of Palace of Caserta3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horse in the fontaine of Neptun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 16:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Ceres Fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Statue3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 21:48, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Statue2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Aeolus Fountain6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:42, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Aeolus Fountain5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:42, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 08:44, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Aeolus Fountain1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Aeolus Fountain4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Aeolus Fountain3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Aeolus Fountain2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coat of arms of Clemens XII on fountain vermicino of Luigi Vanvitelli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK now. --Bgag 18:27, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman Tomb use as fountaine Piazza del Popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality ( ... but isn't it a sarcophagus ?) --JLPC 16:00, 8 October 2014 (UTC) Yes JLPC,sarcophagus is a kind of tomb, however, is always a fountain. Merci. --Livioandronico2013 16:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aaron in the Niche of left fontana dell'acqua felice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 17:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Diana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Atteone with the dogs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Fish.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The bright dots on the back of the fish are too bright, (but it's easy to fix) and I think another crop is possible (see note, please). --JLPC 17:43, 10 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Thans for review --Livioandronico2013 20:48, 10 October 2014 (UTC) Better now. --JLPC 21:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sky a bit on the light side, but good for me.--Famberhorst 15:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Statue4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bronze statue of Giordano Bruno by Ettore Ferrari , Campo de' Fiori, Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good for QI.--Jebulon 19:44, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Statue9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Diana and waterfall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - waterfall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:40, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Aeolus Fountain7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top crop not really convincing, but ok --Poco a poco 10:47, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Statue10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fair enough --Poco a poco 19:37, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Statue11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (but who is she ?).. --JLPC 15:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC) Really i don't know,1 of 948 statues of the palace Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 15:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arch of Janus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine near Ponte Sisto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment a perspective correction is needed imo. --JLPC 16:36, 13 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Merci for review JLPC --Livioandronico2013 17:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC) OK now. --~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of caserta,front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok but please remove the black dust spot/bird from the sky.--ArildV 13:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Anyway was a bird,thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 15:55, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Venus and Adonis Fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Statue1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 10:59, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Constantine the Great in Oria (Retouched).jpg

I don't think this will work; or allowed to do so. Better create a fresh nomination by adding /2 while creating the new nom. Jee 11:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes yes, sorry J. I noticed it too late. --LivioAndronico talk 13:04, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

OK; reverted to previous state. Jee 15:19, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta - Atteone.jpg

Hello, I meant that instead of reducing the highlights (spots that were overexposed) you did increase the luminosity of the whole picture (lightened it up), so everything got brigther, including the spots that already were to bright. I hope I could explain myself, regards, Poco² 19:21, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Demasiado complicado, así que es mejor --LivioAndronico talk 20:11, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

COM:QIC

Please stop edit warring on the candidate list! The picture you nominated and trying to put to CR despite several opposes is indeed low quality, as often the case with your nominations. Please consider to study the Image Guidelines carefully. The QI project surely cannot benefit from nominations of low-quality stuff, as well as it cannot do from careless reviews. Consider this as administrative warning. --A.Savin 00:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window. --LivioAndronico talk 00:24, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

There is also a rule which is imo much more important here: en:WP:POINT. Plus Common sense. --A.Savin 00:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Ok, i'm sorry --LivioAndronico talk 00:43, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Holy Mary in Monserrat of the Spaniards - Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:59, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giordano Bruno in Campo de' fiori.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good --Lmbuga 21:24, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Holy Mary in Monserrat of the Spaniards.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:14, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque of death on Saint Mary of the Prayer and Death.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate of the 1833.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentPlease give some meaninful description. --Hubertl 10:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 16:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC)  Support Good Quality --Hubertl 20:44, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountaine near Ponte Sisto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentThe fountain is slightly tilted to the right and noticeable barrel distortion (both are fixable). --JLPC 16:04, 18 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review JLPC --Livioandronico2013 19:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC) Better now. --JLPC 14:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeasus on Caritas in Via Giulia in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta.garden view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. A symmetric view would be better. --XRay 16:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

I did some corrections..

hi Liviaoandronico, your photo from the Ponte Mazzini is in my opinion not so bad. I just wanted to know, why you withdrawed it. I did some changes an uploaded it. Please make an revert, if you don´t like it. Unlike some others, it is pretty sharp. I have another version here on my PC with even less violet and Magente. I annotated it, where I see the problem. Greetings from Vienna to my belovede City Roma.--Hubertl (talk) 22:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello Hubertl, you definitely your version is better. I retired because I did not like the fact that you've noticed it too. Unfortunately I had noticed only after caricamento.Se come the first Sunday of each month the museums are free throughout Italy and you can do many beautiful photos for free. Greetings from Rome City, say hello to the beautiful Wiener Prater. --LivioAndronico talk 22:17, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Be careful by uploading photos to commons, you don´t have panoramic freedom in Italy like we have in Austria. But I´am sure, you know the italian law better than I do! --Hubertl (talk) 22:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Hubertl. The Italian law on copyright does not contain any exception for photographs taken in public places.Article 70 of Law 633/1941 allows the photographic reproduction of works with the purposes "of criticism or discussion" and "which there is no economic use of the competition". For the moment i know this,anyway in italy.However, in Italy there is a saying :"made a law find the loophole". Naturally i joke . --LivioAndronico talk 22:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Top of Castel Sant'Angelo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:34, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

QI nomination

One image was improved. Greetings. Columna de Razta (talk) 02:09, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion in Quartiere Coppedè (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:59, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Symbol of clements XII on Fontana di Porta Furba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bath Fountain Of Porta Furba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:22, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of Church of Holy Mary in Monserrat of the Spaniards.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:37, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo della Cancelleria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:06, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana di Porta Furba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --Hockei 19:25, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion of Nectanebo2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:02, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Test of angel by Bernini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:02, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion of Nectanebo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:02, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laocoon and His Sons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:28, 26 October 2014 (UTC) Too tight, any way to increase the crop? Poco a poco 18:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 19:04, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apollo of the Belvedere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:11, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Test Angel of Bernini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:29, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CoA Pio VI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:44, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Peter on Ponte Sant'Angelo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please have a look to the image. IMO there are JPEG artifacts at the top. DoF is small and IMO there are CAs at the right.--XRay 07:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC) Yes XRay you're right! See now please --Livioandronico2013 08:13, 26 October 2014 (UTC)  Support OK now.--XRay 12:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace Leonardo Hall on Giardino quadrato,Vaticano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 12:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of King Alfonso XIII of Spain in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laocoon group, lateral view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 11:52, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Test head by Gianlorenzo Bernini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Head in Vatican Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:50, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fresco with CoA of Pope Pius VII.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:52, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture of deer at the Vatican Museums.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Composition not excellent (crop too tight, especially at left). Busy background (not your fault). I suggest a black background, which allows a better size and compo. The main subject is nice and sharp, so it can pass as QI.--Jebulon 10:59, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hercules bronze in the Vatican Museums.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 15:04, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fresco of Augustus that he sees the plans for the Altar of Peace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Lights may be better. --XRay 12:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Roman sculpture of a hunting dog with deer.jpg

Buon giorno LivioAndronico2013,

As you can see, I'm very interested by your pictures in QIC, and I write a lot of comments (often negative, sorry) about them. I don't want you to think that I'm trying to harass you, my behaviour needs maybe explanations, that's why I write today this message on your talk page.

First, I'm a great fan of Rome, which is for me the mother of the cities of the world. I assume you live in Rome, and you are very lucky for that ! So many beauties to be photographied !

As an old timer in the QIC page, I think you can improve, with a minimum of efforts, your pictures and your nominations.

Please have a look on the image above, and to the file page. See the categorization I've improved. Remember this: your picture is now visible in many more pages ! That's why a good categorization is a mandatory. "Vatican museums" is not enough, and not accurate, neither precise enough. If you don't care, then "Commons" is not the good site for your pictures.

"Roman sculpture of a hunting dog with deer" is not sufficient for a description. Remember that an english description is NOT a mandatory. If you prefer using your own mother language (italian ?) please do so. But we need to know more elements, something like this description (another deer !), which is not only mine, but was improved by further users. You may use the template {artwork}, which is interesting for work of arts. What I often do: when visiting a museum or an exhibition, I take for me a photograph of the description plate neer the statue or the painting, it is very useful when you upload a picture (please have look to my next upload: I've taken pics in an exhibition about the "Mayas" in Paris, with many informations. Really interesting. It needs work, but then you'll do a good job for "Commons".

As for the technical flaws of your images. This one of the deer and the dog, is not a QI for me. Why ? Because you took it inside of the museum, and inside picture are more difficult than outside pictures: less light, but flash and tripods not allowed. So, settings of the camera are a compromise. In general, you overprocess your images. It is the case here. You added too much sharpness (it is visible, for instance, because of the white line along the neck of the deer. One can see this white line in some other places of your subject). After that, you apply noise reduction, but too much too. This is visible by the artificial softness of the textures of your images: no more little reliefs are perceptible, and some details are lost. This is the case for your "Apollo of the Belvedere" in QIC too, and somebody else than me saw that.

One of my other ideas: the most an object (or a place) is famous, the more the picture must be excellent !! And the Apollo of the Belvedere is one of the world masterpieces of the history of sculpture !! (so is the Laocoon group too...)

And, last but not least, the moving guy with the green shirt in background is really eye-catching, and spoils the composition. Maybe you will be interested, in the future, by using a mask, as I often do for my museum pictures (see the example above). It is a good way to do (no problem of tight crops and composition !), and offers a lot of possibilities, even with free softwares (gratis). You may ask for advices (I suggest you to contact User:Archaeodontosaurus, who is a friend, a champion of masking, and... a fluently italian speaker !).

You outside pictures are getting better and better, but be careful of the crop around your subjects, often too tight. Cropping a part of a subject by accident is a no-go for QI. Be careful of contrast with sky and clouds. And of course, improve you categorizations and descriptions. You recently uploaded a nice picture of a relief of the coats of arms of Pius XI (?), but there is no indication of the location. Geolocation is very useful: When I'll be back to Rome, how could I find this object (assuming it is in Rome !) ?

Have a nice week-end with many good photographs, and I hope to be useful for you.--Jebulon (talk) 15:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Dites que vous êtes intéressé par est très simpliste, mais vous devez comprendre ce que vous savez que vous avez appris au fil des ans. Pour d'autres, comme User:Archaeodontosaurus,JLPC,Poco a poco,Lmbuga ecc... sont très gentils avec moi car ils comprennent les difficultés que je peux avoir. Ensuite, si les photos sont à être déclinées où est le problème? Je ne possède pas de photographe à ses heures perdues. Si vous voyez des améliorations au régime de sol-je faire, parce que toujours, les bonnes gens que je l'ai mentionné ci-dessus, comment peuvent-ils me aider. Que faire si il ne catégorise pas que ce soit pas le site pour moi aussi cette façon de faire est, à mon avis, très mauvais. Je fais des progrès, mais il faut être patient avec les utilisateurs. Charger des photos sur le QI 3 mois! Soyez patient et vous verrez des améliorations. Dans la première partie de votre message encyclopédique vous avez été gentil et je vous en remercie. Il y a différentes façons de faire les choses. Désolé si je vous écris en français, mais je suis mieux. Passez une bonne soirée. --LivioAndronico talk 16:37, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Nous sommes une grande famille et apprenons les uns des autres. Pour cette image je pense que je detourerais complètement la statue avec un fond noir le résultat devrait être parfais comme suggère par Jebulon.

La durée de vie d’une image est souvent liée à la qualité de sa légende. Dans le cas de cette image il faut une légende en italien et une en anglais. Avec la période, le nom de l’auteur et le matériau utilisé. Les catégories vont découler elles même de la légende. Regarde avec attention se que font les autres et surtout n’hésite pas à demander. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Merci mon ami, belle comme toujours --LivioAndronico talk 17:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Buona sera, LivioAndronico,

Suis-je heureux avec les Stemme de Pius XI ? Oui et non. Oui pour la géolocation (je ne les avais pas vues lors de ma dernière visite au "Cortile della Pinacoteca"). Non, je ne suis pas heureux pour la catégorisation. Vois plutôt ceci, je pense que tu comprendras. "Cortile della Pinacoteca" est suffisant, le reste est en trop, c'est de la "sovracategorizzazione". Il faut aller tout au bout de la dernière branche, mais ne pas s'arrêter en chemin ! Donc j'ai enlevé des catégories intermédiaires, mais j'ai rajouté quelques autres !! Ce n'est pas très difficile avec le temps, et c'est très amusant. Je te dis comme Archaeodontosaurus: surtout n'oublie pas, nous sommes là pour t'aider, pas pour t'ennuyer ! Choisis bien tes photos, toutes ne sont pas forcément des QI (moi, j'en jette beaucoup !) Amitiés, et bonsoir ! --Jebulon (talk) 17:36, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Lorsque trop et quand peu, qui est la vie. Nous avons une idée très différente de plaisir. Je sais que le QI est pas tout, en fait, des 465 photos prises domencia je mets vingt. Et enfin, les autres ne me ennuyer, pas du tout. Passez une bonne soirée.--LivioAndronico talk 17:49, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salamander on the facade of the church of S. Louis of France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good for QI.--Jebulon 23:25, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carlo Magno on the facade of the church of St. Louis of France, front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Jebulon 23:33, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta Sistus V - Porta Furba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:29, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Picture of St. Louis of the French.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Cropping misstake in the top right corner. Other than that it's QI for me--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 23:24, 2 November 2014 (UTC) Can you leave a note? Thanks --Livioandronico2013 23:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality. A Note? Where and for what? --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 00:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Camillus de Lellis in facade of church Santa Maria Maddalena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 23:30, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of S. Philip Neri in facade of church Santa Maria Maddalena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Code 18:28, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of St. Louis of the French,San Luigi dei Francesi (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a vertical perspective correction.--Jebulon 23:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)  Done Merci for review --Livioandronico2013 23:37, 1 November 2014 (UTC)better. OK. What tool do you use ? Quel logiciel utilises-tu ?--Jebulon 21:36, 2 November 2014 (UTC) photoshop CC,paint.net merci. --Livioandronico2013 22:28, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salamander on the facade of the church of St. Louis of France.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carlo Magno on the facade of the church of St. Louis of France, seen from below.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:50, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CoA Pope Clement XI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The crop is too tight below, any chance we have the sculpture complete ?--Jebulon 20:30, 29 October 2014 (UTC) sure is in the photo in front of you --Livioandronico2013 20:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)  Done More big of this is impossible for me --Livioandronico2013 20:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)OK now, better, thanks.--Jebulon 21:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

QIC comments

Hi, Please keep your comments on QIC here on facts, not on the attitude on the critics. If you can't windstand critics, you better not propose images there. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

You need to be more precise because I do not know what you mean, thank you.--LivioAndronico talk 09:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Funeral monument of Pope Adrian VI,foreground.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intern of the Church Our Lady of the Soul (National church of Dutch Catholics ).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Picture of St. Louis of the French,foreground.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace on Giardino quadrato,Vaticano - Front View.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It need a little sharpening IMO, especialy at top --Christian Ferrer 10:33, 3 November 2014 (UTC)  Done let me know if now is good Christian Gracias --Livioandronico2013 16:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC) Support it is --Christian Ferrer 18:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Circular staircase of the Vatican Museums.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar of St Louis in the Church of St. Louis of France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Painting is a bit grainy, but ok --Uoaei1 19:40, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intern of church of St. Louis of France.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI now imo. --JLPC 15:12, 3 November 2014 (UTC) RequestIt would be nice if you could ad in the description the painters name of the altarpiece --Moroder 07:08, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate of Ludovico Ariosto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vicolo della Spada d'Orlando (Durlindana) - Alley of the Sword of Orlando (Durlindana).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Tarento

Yes indeed the name Tarentula come from the city and Province of Tarento. My spider is a cousin of yours. So you can take easily photos of Lycosa tarantula (tarantola) -- Christian Ferrer ^{Talk / Im. / Fav.} 13:16, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

I could Christian but unfortunately, as the name Livioandronico suggests, I live in Rome for work, and in any case I believe that with the pollution of Taranto are many death. --LivioAndronico talk 13:26, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Inevitably our illustrious predecessors disappeared, certainly also a big number of spiders... -- Christian Ferrer ^{Talk / Im. / Fav.} 06:57, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Pope Adrian VI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. DoF could be better. --XRay 08:13, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coa of Pope Alexander VII on the Elephant and Obelisk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective not perfect, but close enough --Poco a poco 19:59, 9 November 2014 (UTC)  Done Better? --Livioandronico2013 20:33, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose window of the church Saint Mary above Minerva 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose window of the church Saint Mary above Minerva.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:59, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elephant and Obelisk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intern of the church Saint Mary above Minerva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decorations on Lincean Academy (Villa Farnesiana).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK now. --JLPC 18:34, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate in Trastevere by Orsini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you try to get the left and right border rectilinear? --Cccefalon 07:44, 7 November 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 09:57, 7 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:24, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cappella della Madonna Del Rosario in St. Mary above Minerva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but tilted on left --Christian Ferrer 16:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)  Done Merci Christian Ferrer --Livioandronico2013 16:22, 10 November 2014 (UTC) Support maybe the right is leaning in a bit, however it's acceptable IMO, nice --Christian Ferrer 17:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madonna with child and angels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar of the Church Our Lady of the Soul (National church of Dutch Catholics).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Quality is good. Complex color mix (indoor lighting vs. window) means it should probably not be modified. --Ram-Man 19:23, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Dumpster_roman_burned.JPG

Hi Livio, you just rotated the said file: The fence at the right is now rectilinear but already in the middle, the fence is leaning out. You have to apply a real un-distort procedure there, to get a suitable result. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:10, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Nagut, danke - ich kümmer mich drum sobald ich kann --LivioAndronico talk 11:17, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dumpster Roman green.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not pretty, but good enough quality. --Slaunger 21:58, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coa of Pope Pius V on the church Saint Mary above Minerva.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now. (Can you add a geocode ?). --JLPC 18:26, 11 November 2014 (UTC) Done Merci --Livioandronico2013 19:36, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate for garbage in Trastevere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:42, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obelisco Guglielmo Marconi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Categorization

Helloooooo!

Bonsoir, c'est encore moi 😜 !!

L'obsédé des catégoriiiiies 😱 !!

Ne compare pas les photos. Compare plutôt, s'il te plaît, cette catégorisation de toi, avec cette catégorisation de moi.

Tu aimes ?👹

Buona notteeeeee !!💤--Jebulon (talk) 23:30, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Mais il est certainement mieux, je ne trouve tous ces --LivioAndronico talk 11:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of Our Lady of the Soul (national church of German Catholics ).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate of José de San Martín in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Indeed, I see you found the aspect ratio bar on your own :) --Poco a poco 16:46, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate of the foundation of Hospital Child Jesus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Brateevsky 08:18, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! To the Virgin Mary with the SS. John the Evangelist and John the Baptist.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:08, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spqr plate on Palazzo Corsini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Cccefalon 22:04, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paper dumpster Roman.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ram-Man 21:55, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Rome view from Via San Lucio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:28, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain in Piazza farnese.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 22:54, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stendhal's plate in piazza della Minerva (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obelisk of the Pantheon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:09, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obelisk and fountaine of the Pantheon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Vertical lines not perfect, but OK for QI. --C messier 21:36, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of St. Peter view from Via San Lucio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment : slightly leaning to the right. --JLPC 16:16, 14 November 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 17:10, 14 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality now. --JLPC 16:06, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of St. Peter on bridge of Angels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit of noise, but good quality--Lmbuga 17:18, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angel on bridge of angels in Rome.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:58, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate on Santa Maria sopra Minerva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Cccefalon 07:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate for garbage in Trastevere (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:29, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Rome 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:43, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge Umberto I in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 13:55, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Il Sassoferrato « Madonna col Bambino ed angeli».
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment We can not say that one picture is all his work. The scope would be good  : [[:category:Il Sassoferrato|Il Sassoferrato]] « Madona col Bambino ed angeli» --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

 Fini Merci for review --LivioAndronico talk 19:54, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope. Nice picture. Yann (talk) 01:16, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 21:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panoramics in Rome seen from Via San Lucio.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The right scope should be Panoramics in Rome, but there is much more competition there... Also needs geocoding. Yann (talk) 01:21, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Why oppose? The quality of my picture is hight respect the others,check the others. Anyway i write also from where i take it. Gps fixed. Yann come on man ,how can you do this to me? --LivioAndronico talk 18:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Now all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support support, as Archeo....--Hubertl (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niches of Temple of Diana in Nemi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:33, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rests of altar and temple of Temple of Diana in Nemi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rest of altar of Temple of Diana in Nemi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castel Sant'Angelo ( Mausoleo di Andriano).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aqueducts in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting lighting, QI -- Spurzem 22:00, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The park of the aqueducts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Columns in Temple of Diana (Nemi).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 12:59, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rest of altar and columns in Temple of Diana (Nemi).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 12:59, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Ruspoli in Nemi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments On the dark side, but okay for me.--Famberhorst 16:25, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Station of Line C Metro in Rome Borghesiana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Station of Line C Metro in Rome Monte Compatri - Pantano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 14:45, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rails End of Line C Metro of Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:09, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Rome 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left is leaning in, it need also some contrast and sharpening --Christian Ferrer 07:01, 22 November 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review Christian if i be honest, I'm not sure of the result. See you. Merci. --Livioandronico2013 08:40, 22 November 2014 (UTC) Support the cut crane is a bit disturbing however acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 09:51, 22 November 2014 (UTC)  Done Crane is out now,thanks --Livioandronico2013 10:18, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arch of the Line C of Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:08, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Station of Line C Metro in Rome Giardinetti.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Station of Line C Metro in Rome Giardinetti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The sharpness could be better, but according to your settings, all is ok. Probably, you should ask Santa Claus for a new lens --Cccefalon 16:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC) Santa Claus will bring me a daughter whom will take away whatever lenses because unfortunately I live in Italy --Livioandronico2013 18:30, 23 November 2014 (UTC) Congratulations ... however, I had taken the lens ;-) --Cccefalon 18:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Station of Line C Metro in Rome Torre Angela.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --JLPC 16:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niche of temple of Diana in Nemi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now, good quality. --Cayambe 20:37, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Battlements of the castle of Torrenova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Station of Line C Metro in Rome Torrenova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rests of Temple of Diana in Nemi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intern of Church of St. John of the Malva in Trastevere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your FP nominations

Hi,

Instead to nominate, and then withdraw, as much images as you can, you should choose them. You should also complete the nomination (description), which I did for your last one. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Yann ,I had chosen the other but then I realized that there was too much noise, unfortunately I have a bad monitor in my office and I had not noticed. Can you kindly what you mean by "complete the nomination (description)"? आपकी शाम अच्छी बीते --LivioAndronico talk 21:41, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

This [2]. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:44, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Understood,excuse me --LivioAndronico talk 21:47, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of Saint Peter in the afternoon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old cranes abandoned at the port of Taranto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A part of the sky needs a de-birdie-fying (see my note). --Cccefalon 11:27, 26 November 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review Cccefalon --Livioandronico2013 11:54, 26 November 2014 (UTC) Sorry for delay! Ok for me! --Cccefalon 19:25, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Madonna with child and angels.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Madonna with child and angels.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Congratulation!--Hubertl (talk) 14:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Danke :) --LivioAndronico talk 21:13, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose window in Santa Maria sopra Minerva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:40, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luke the Evangelist on Santissima Trinità dei Pellegrini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Station of Line C Metro in Rome Torre Gaia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:30, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Closing consensual review on QIC page

Hi!

After You have added QIC voting results, please change "Discuss" to Promotion or Decline or Nomination (if it's inconclusive result), so the bot can remove candidates automatically. Good luck! --Ivar (talk) 12:32, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Oh my dog! You've right Ivar,sorry my mistake.Tervitused. --LivioAndronico talk 12:51, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Padlocks in Ponte Milvio.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:19, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Flaminio (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate at Ponte Milvio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate of Pope Callistus III ( Borja ) in Ponte Milvio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 14:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Jesus in Ponte Milvio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:31, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Milvio HD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 12:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of St. Peter in the afternoon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good technical quality. --Code 06:44, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pole with padlocks in Ponte Milvio.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:46, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Streetlight with padlocks Ponte Milvio1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok from sharpness point of view, sharpening could help --Poco a poco 12:11, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Streetlight with padlocks Ponte Milvio.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Streetlight with padlocks bridge milvio.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oké.--Famberhorst 16:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

QI Consensual review

Ciao, according to the rules "After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template QICresult and then executed, according to the Guidelines." last comment was at 28 November, more than 48 hours ago. --C messier (talk) 16:52, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok C messier but we normally wait 8 days normally,also counts the actual votes,you wrote 2 vote but was only 1. More give a title in the interventions in the pages you otherwise do not understand much. Finally you write on the page where the intervention began to have a logical thread, thanks. --LivioAndronico talk 17:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Moreover normally is who was opposed, if he changed his mind and is the only one to oppose , closing the discussion. Thanks. --LivioAndronico talk 17:02, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok for the last. About the 2 supports, I counted also the comment from Smial (who originally promoted the image) as support [3]. --C messier (talk) 17:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

That isn't counted were made specifically  Support and  Oppose for the clear support or opposition. --LivioAndronico talk 17:10, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Do I have to add  Support or  Oppose to comment if the user who wrote it didn't, but it's obvious (eg changed to promotion)? --C messier (talk) 17:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

It happens often that does not put the support and the picture is declined even for a vote.If you often see those who go into discussion then adds it, some do it immediately.--LivioAndronico talk 17:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Using  Support or  Oppose will make it easier to count your vote. is write on the Consensual review--LivioAndronico talk 17:24, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Es ist dir hoffentlich klar...

Es ist dir hoffentlich klar, dass ich Dich wegen Deines gestrigen und auch heutigen Amoklaufs auf QI gegenüber meiner Fotos auf COM:AN/U melden werde. Bei solchen Aktionen hört sich für mich der Spaß auf! --Steindy (talk) 12:51, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

English,italian,spanish o french Steindy,i don't speak German. --LivioAndronico talk 12:56, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Du wirst es auch so verstehen. Warum soll ich mir auch noch die Mühe machen, dies für dich zu übersetzen? --Steindy (talk) 12:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

I surrender...--LivioAndronico talk 13:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

FPC Confirmation

Hi, I just saw you confirmed the conclusion of this nomination. You should have noticed that Hubertl voted twice (by accident I suppose), so there is only eight supports, not nine. Though this does not alter the result, it might do so in another case, so please check carefully. --Kreuzschnabel 20:52, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Ops...This Hubertl,always vote two times.Correct immediately ,Thanks Kreuzschnabel --LivioAndronico talk 20:56, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Sometimes reviewing the closures is a hard job :-) I put a note on Hubertl’s talk page as well. I don’t think he does it on purpose. --Kreuzschnabel 21:00, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

No Kreuzschnabel, I'm not sure that he does it on purpose. He's a good guy. --LivioAndronico talk 21:03, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

County Bridge No. 23 sign (Columbia County, Pennsylvania) QIC (November 29, 2014)

Hi. I've sharpened File:County Bridge No. 23 sign (Columbia County, Pennsylvania).JPG. Please take another look. Thanks, --Jakob (talk) 21:46, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok Jakob,isn't the normal way but for one time I can do it. --LivioAndronico talk 21:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Please, don´t accuse someone, who is blocked!

I reverted this here, because the user is blocked, he cannot answer to your accusations, and in fact, it is not sure, if he really opposed because Pezi declined his nomination. Even when its true, its not relevant. On the other hand, its Pezis thing to react, not ours. We all should act like adults, not beeing childish. --Hubertl (talk) 21:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Please don't revert my edit,if you don't know who is blocked can write on his user page. Anyway I can write and I assume quietly reactions. --LivioAndronico talk 21:22, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Todi panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Todi panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:42, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decorations of wall in Santa Maria sopra Minerva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:11, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval Tomb in Santa Maria sopra Minerva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Do you shoot in RAW?

Do you have RAW for this file: File:Porta San Paolo (Rome).jpg? --C messier (talk) 17:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Sure,why? --LivioAndronico talk 17:08, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

It's easier to correct WB from the raw. Although better (IMHO good enough for QI), it still looks a little unatural (maybe too red). --C messier (talk) 17:12, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

See now --LivioAndronico talk 17:33, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

It looks OK. --C messier (talk) 17:53, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta San Paolo (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC) It's WB is wrong (too blue), see the mini vans. --C messier 16:34, 7 December 2014 (UTC)  Done --Livioandronico2013 17:01, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Better. --C messier 17:05, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piramid Cestia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 19:16, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piramide Cestia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:26, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa Di San Bonaventura Al Palatino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:53, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Written on the Pyramid of Cestius.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta S. Paolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, could be better in afternoon --The Photographer 11:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colosseum and Arch of Constantine seen from Palatine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:56, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Streetlight with padlocks Ponte Milvio3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's from the great photographer Livioandronico2013. Therefore almost perfect! --Steindy 21:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC) Deleted because written by locked user and also is a tease. --Livioandronico2013 11:19, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 06:03, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Streetlight with padlocks Ponte Milvio2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's from the great photographer Livioandronico2013. Therefore almost perfect! --Steindy 21:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC) Deleted because written by locked user and also is a tease. --Livioandronico2013 11:19, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 05:59, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Rome with Arch of Costantine,Via Sacra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Too much sky. We need a crop here. --Halavar 11:35, 9 December 2014 (UTC) Better in this way Halavar? Thanks. --Livioandronico2013 13:25, 9 December 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 14:04, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doors of the Colosseum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:46, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arch of Constantine,right up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arch of Constantine,center up.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arch of Constantine,left up.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colosseum seen from Vigna Barberini.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinus pinaster and ruins on Palatine Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Sebastiano on Palatine Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinus pinaster on Palatine Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of San Bonaventura on Palatine Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)  Comment I added a note, but in general, I second Hubertl's reviews. Your todays set of images shows a big improvement of your skills, Livio. --Cccefalon 09:34, 12 December 2014 (UTC) Thanks Cccefalon,I am very pleased to be told you, and thanks to your advice. Affectionately --Livioandronico2013 14:11, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of church of Santa Francesca Romana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower Bell of Church of Santa Francesca Romana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Code 09:11, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Santa Francesca Romana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:54, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colosseum lateral view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness at both sides just ok --Poco a poco 10:54, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arch of Constantine (Rome) ,lateral view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Whats really a pity is,

is, that you have no FOP in Italy. Like we have it here in Austria. Even for almost every sculture, as long it can be seen and taken from an open space. Not private. (Sculptures, even modern, must be permanent, that means, more than 6 month).

Wikimedia Italy is working on that! But because the government changes almost every 6 month ;-), they have to start new negotiation every 6 month. (this is the short story!) --Hubertl (talk) 13:36, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Wait Hubertl that's going to reciprocate --LivioAndronico talk 13:46, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Law is always reciprocal. In this case, it is additionally interesting because the origins of this law in the 19th century. are found in Italy. The former nobles his or her own authority created (like Bundesdenkmalamt in Austria, the National Heritage Office), which was there to protect historical heritage and - if necessary - and financially to restore.

The nobles were also the owners of this cultural heritage - in addition to that, the churches. So they have managed to devote public funds for their own purposes.

But they had no interest to make their goods publicly available. They did not want that everyone can see that they get in reality a huge amount of money to renovate their own homes - as owners.

The presidents of this authority were the same people who have benefited from it - almost until today.

You can be sure that only a small portion of the money went in a really significant cultural treasures, eg. I mean the Roman or Etruscan culture goods. This explains, however, why there is no FOP in Italy.

That a modern bridge only private but should not be photographed for commercial purposes, is a part of what I wrote. That a modern bridge can be photographed only for privat and not for commercial purposes, is a part of that, what I wrote before.

That a modern bridge can only pictured privately and not for commercial purposes, is a part of what I wrote.

Almost all of these new objects can be found today on public property. Still, if someone wants to make a postcard, then the publisher will make a contract with the architect and then will pay for each picture card a few cents to the architect. What interest should have an architect to change that?

What interest does the noble society have to change the rules while getting money for their privat properties? For nothing, except for their own advantage! --Hubertl (talk) 14:48, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Welcome in Italy --LivioAndronico talk 15:01, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Angel on bridge of angels in Rome.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Angel on bridge of angels in Rome.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Congratulation! I am impressed, how you developed your skills in such a short time!--Hubertl (talk) 15:28, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Hubertl,also for your help.--LivioAndronico talk 21:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Maybe, you can get a grant next year for Wikimania Mexico! --Hubertl (talk) 21:34, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

We will see Hubertl,who knows--LivioAndronico talk 21:43, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

THANKS - GRACIAS

Muchas gracias por tu compañía. Tu compañía ha sido más, mucho más que simple comprensión.

Aunque timidamente, durante los próximos meses, volveré a estar presente en Commons. Tú y otros usuarios conseguisteis hacerme ver que, a pesar de mis innumerables errores, quereis que siga.

Seguiré con vosotros. Gracias--Lmbuga

Espero volver a verte aquí pronto a declinar mis fotos como un tiempo Lmbuga, porque esto también, además de su consejo me hizo crecer. Afectuosamente --LivioAndronico talk 21:41, 14 December 2014 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The back of the Vittoriano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campidoglio and Vittoriano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Sebastiano al Palatino (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:40, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colosseum and Via Sacra (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.Great picture! --Hubertl 12:40, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papal coats of arms Urbanus VIII on San Sebastiano al Palatino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --JLPC 16:24, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Maxentius.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House and ruins in Palatino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:16, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate on Arch of Constantine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 15:14, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decorations on Arch of Constantine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arch of Constantine,lateral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castel Sant'Angelo at Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective issue: the wall is horizontal, while the top of the castle is leaning to the right --Uoaei1 07:12, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Uoaei1 leave a note please,i don't understand where leaning,thanks. --Livioandronico2013 08:09, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Done Uoaei1,tell me if is good now,thanks --Livioandronico2013 12:10, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Better, although not optimal, as now the wall with the merlons is not horizontal --Uoaei1 18:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge Umberto I at Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, made some changes. --Hubertl 15:41, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge Vittorio Emanuele II at Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, no more underexposures, lights are balanced --Hubertl 15:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doors of Colosseum (new and old).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support This is a very nice image. --Ram-Man 04:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of the Palatino with The church of San Bonaventura and San Sebastiano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ram-Man 16:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Statue of San Giovanni di Dio in the Hospital San Pietro Fatebenefratelli.jpg

Hi Livioandronico2013, who is the sculptor of the depicted statue and when did he/she live/die? --Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

I don't know,but the statue is of first year of 1900,I think is Die. --LivioAndronico talk 08:47, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Oh, it is already that old? To me it looked more recent, but I am no expert. I was asking this question for copyright-reasons. --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes for this reason I asked to the hospital,but the brothers knew it was around 1910. However, it was restored.--LivioAndronico talk 08:52, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

O.k., then we are more or less safe. Thanks. A true restoration shouldn't attract any new copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Don't worry, now I always ask because in this country we have stupid laws strange--LivioAndronico talk 09:02, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lateran Obelisk HD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:20, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of S.Peter in the night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of Saint Peter's Basilica (exterior) at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your wishes

From here my family comes from, I´m co-owner (and I hope so, preserver!) of this valley until today.. Suprisingly, isn´t it? My italian roots. --Hubertl (talk) 11:30, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge Vittorio Emanuele II and dome of San peter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and merry Christmas! --Hubertl 17:43, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of Saint Peter's Basilica at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.png

...is a copyvio. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:35, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Steinsplitter

--LivioAndronico talk 10:40, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas too

Buon Natale, my prefered Roman !--Jebulon (talk) 11:57, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

...also from me. My best wishes to you and your family! Also Jebulon's, of course, best, Poco² 12:12, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Buon natale

Grazie per il tuo messaggio e anche per te un buon natale! Ti invidio, perché vivi a Roma. È senza dubbio la città più bella del mondo. --Code (talk) 13:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Of course not, sans aucun doute, c'est Paris la ville la plus belle du monde ! --Jebulon (talk) 23:40, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Best wiches

Thanks and best wishes dearly for you too. :) -- ChristianFerrer 16:06, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Wishes

Thanks for your good wishes, also happy hew year 😜. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:42, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upper of Santa Croce in Gerusalemme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:36, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Column via Piero Gobetti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Column via aldo moro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Best wishes for 2015

Thanks for your wishes, and happy new year tou you and your family too ! --JLPC (talk) 10:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Merci :) --LivioAndronico talk 10:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo storico dei granatieri di Sardegna 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Solid image. Good quality. --Ram-Man 03:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo storico dei granatieri di Sardegna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Although its a little bit oversharpened. --Hubertl 00:46, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Eurysaces the Baker - details.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:17, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta Maggiore ("Larger Gate"),or Porta Prenestina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for mealthought not perfectly symmetrical --C messier 22:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta Maggiore ("Larger Gate"), or Porta Prenestina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:17, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Consesual review closure timing

Why such a hurry to close the consensual reviews. The template says after 8 consensual review days (neither 8 review days nor 8 days after nomination). (google traslate to italian: Perché tanta fretta di chiudere le recensioni consensuali. Il modello dice dopo 8 consensuali recensioni giorni, né 8 recensioni giorni né 8 giorni dopo la nomina). Btw, my best wishes for 2015! --C messier (talk) 12:38, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

What hurry C messier??? Read the rules and read the table under the CR:

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

Fri 03 May → Sat 11 May
Sat 04 May → Sun 12 May
Sun 05 May → Mon 13 May
Mon 06 May → Tue 14 May
Tue 07 May → Wed 15 May
Wed 08 May → Thu 16 May
Thu 09 May → Fri 17 May
Fri 10 May → Sat 18 May
Sat 11 May → Sun 19 May

Bye --LivioAndronico talk 17:33, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I know, these are days after nomination, not after consensual review. --C messier (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

I really don't understand you! Where is the problem? Works in this way from years.--LivioAndronico talk 17:38, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

The problem is mainly for files that went to CR after they were in the nomination page for 7 days, the CR will have to last only one day (before the 8th day after nomination is completed) which I think is just little time to give a result (the template QICresults says for CR -not nomination- that lasts 8 days). --C messier (talk) 17:44, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok C messier there is an underlying problem then! Not that you go in CR the same day or after a week you have to follow the file, the number of votes, and the type of opposition. Let me give an example, if a file is loaded today after two days goes in CR but for example one vote positive and 4 negative you can also close before. Other files for example are loaded with improvements and you can wait a bit. It depends from case to case and you have to read a case by case. --LivioAndronico talk 17:53, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

I can't disagree with that. Of course a CR can be closed if the result is obvious before the 8th day or expanded.--C messier (talk) 18:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Normally if a file is loaded on 20 (I give an example) after 8 days then the 28 (isn't important if it is in CR 1 or 5 days) closes.--LivioAndronico talk 17:56, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

The rules of CR say that "After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}}", this means that a CR should remain open for at least 48 hours (2 days). We can start a discussion here and ask for opinions by other users. --C messier (talk) 18:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

And in fact remain there for eight days, i still do not understand. If you want to open a discussion them free to do so, now I salute you.--LivioAndronico talk 18:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Felice e pieno di belle foto 2015!--C messier (talk) 18:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cemetery of Trevignano Romano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 20:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate of San Bernardino in Trevignano Romano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta Maggiore ("Larger Gate").jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 08:48, 31 December 2014 (UTC)