User talk:Liridon

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Liridon!

Quick reminder: Commons Photographers meeting this Saturday[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

This is a quick reminder that our next meeting will happen on Saturday, August 5th. If you haven't registered yet and you're interested in learning more about underwater photography and “Flickypedia”, please sign up on this page. Also, I invite you to fill out this survey created by the people who are working on the Flickr-to-Wikimedia Commons software. Your input will make a difference.

We haven't had a virtual meeting in a while and I'm so looking forward to this weekend!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jablanica mountain in winter 2020 and church Sveta troica Parumba 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 12:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jablanica Mountain, in background Ohrid Lake Autumn, 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 12:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nderlysaj, Parku Kombëtar i Thethit 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me, but how do you end up with such neat numbers as 3,000 × 4,000 pixels? Also, someone might object to the perspective of the structures on the upper left, but I would support promotion if you can explain how you end up with such neat numbers of pixels. -- Ikan Kekek 17:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support The resolution of the camera is 3000 x 4000 px? --Kallerna 09:15, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Is it? -- Ikan Kekek 18:59, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek @Kallerna sorry for my late reply. Yes, this picture was shot with HERO6 Black which has resolution 4000 x 3000 pixels. Liridon (talk) 08:11, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. It's a good picture. Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:26, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Val Tovanella Bosconero, Febbraio 2023 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 08:32, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolomiti del Cadore e del Comelico, Febbraio 2023 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Аныл Озташ 15:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailing boat at sunset, Ionian Sea, Albania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JPxG 05:26, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Val Tovanella Bosconero, Febbraio 2023 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:19, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old ski lift, Kodra e Diellit, North Macedonia 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 09:58, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old ski lift, Kodra e Diellit, North Macedonia 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 14:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old ski lift, Kodra e Diellit, North Macedonia 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 09:58, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Promotion {{{2}}}[edit]

Please read Commons_talk:Quality_images_candidates#Promotion. 多多123 11:45, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The exterior architecture of a building in Treviso, Italy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Perspective correctionis needed. --Sebring12Hrs 13:27, 20 August 2023 (UTC)  Comment Uploaded new version. Perspective is a little bit tricky in this kind of pics.--Liridon 07:54, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Looks way better now. --多多123 13:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New ski lift, Kodra e Diellit, North Macedonia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:44, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maja e Shebenikut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is still the dust spot to remove. See Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 08 2023 --Milseburg 10:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed it. --Liridon 12:17, 23 August 2023 (UTC) QK for me. You should still reduce the highlights and the blue a bit.--Milseburg 14:30, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jablanica Mountain range in winter showing Chumin and Black Stone peaks.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jablanica Mountain, hiking to Raduc peak (2019) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 è iniziato: partecipa anche tu![edit]

Buongiorno Liridon,

ricevi questo messaggio perché in passato hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia o Wiki Loves Earth Italia.

Anche quest’anno torna Wiki Loves Monuments: da oggi al 30 settembre puoi partecipare caricando le tue foto per contribuire a illustrare il patrimonio culturale italiano: vai sul sito wikilovesmonuments.it e scopri come fare!

Oltre ai 20.000 monumenti già in concorso, quest’anno si aggiungono più di 60.000 edifici religiosi, tema centrale di quest’edizione. Prendi la tua macchina fotografica, o il tuo smartphone, e individua i monumenti in concorso tramite la nuova web-app – disponibile sia da mobile che desktop – app.wikilovesmonuments.it, da cui potrai anche caricare direttamente i tuoi scatti. Sono ammesse anche foto scattate prima del concorso, purché siano inedite.

A livello nazionale verranno premiate le dieci migliori fotografie: cinque per gli edifici religiosi e cinque per le altre categorie di monumenti; queste immagini parteciperanno anche alla fase internazionale del concorso. Non sono ammesse immagini con watermark o cornici, né fotografie eccessivamente elaborate in postproduzione. Qui puoi consultare Il regolamento completo e per qualsiasi dubbio puoi scrivere a contatti@wikilovesmonuments.it.

In bocca al lupo e buon divertimento! --Ysogo(talk) 05:0, 1 September 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pieve di Cadore, Febbraio 2023 (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:17, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view from of Struga from Jablanica Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 07:52, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Delahaye, Podgorica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia - Tempio Votivo di Santa Maria Immacolata - 2023-09-01 14-58-35 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:40, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia - Tempio Votivo di Santa Maria Immacolata - 2023-09-01 14-58-35 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:39, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia - Tempio Votivo di Santa Maria Immacolata - 2023-09-01 14-58-35 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
could you try a slight dehaze? --Grunpfnul 14:51, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Grunpfnul: Thank you for review, I added a slight dehaze and uploaded new version--Liridon 11:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 15:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Sahat Kula, 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Need perspective correction. --Mike1979 Russia 15:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Perspective is a bit tricky, I have no idea anymore in which side to rotate to fix it.--Liridon 13:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The image is littered from the observer, perspective correction is needed here, this defect cannot be corrected by rotation. The right and left corners of the tower and building should be vertical. --Mike1979 Russia 06:53, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike1979 Russia: tried to fix it, check if that is acceptable. --Liridon 11:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I corrected the perspective. But now someone else has to do review. --Mike1979 Russia 16:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia - Chiesa dei Santi Apostoli - 2023-09-08 16-34-30 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support It looks a little bit washed-out but IMHO it is good quality. --Terragio67 15:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pieve di Cadore - Casa natale di Tiziano Vecellio - 2023-09-07 21-29-23 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ktkvtsh 22:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treviso - Bastione Santa Sofia - 2023-09-08 10-21-24 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ktkvtsh 22:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia - Basilica dei Santi Giovanni e Paolo - 2023-09-08 16-51-51 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 20:27, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia - Chiesa di San Geremia - 2023-09-08 16-13-33 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bologna - Santuario di Santa Maria della Vita - 2023-09-09 18-44-30 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

in preparation of the 2023 board election of our group, we invite you to take a look at the following page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023

and provide feedback.

The timeline for the 2023 election will be

  • September 15 – September 30: Applications for the election committee
  • October 1 – October 9: Vote for election committee (ideally comprised of three members)
  • October 10: Election committee starts work
  • October 20 – November 9: Nomination phase for candidacies
  • November 10 – December 10: Elections
  • December 15: Results announced

In the first step we ask you to be part of the election committe. Please add your name on the Election Page.

We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

All the best

--Ailura (talk) for the CPUG board

2 nominations of the same image in QIC[edit]

Hi Liridon, I noticed that your image - Treviso - Chiesa di San Nicolò is in QIC/L twice. Some user just nominated the image again. Would you mind if I remove the image, which was nominated by the user, not you? Thanks in advance. --Laquearius (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Laquearius, I just saw it that the one nominated by other user was votet as "good quality". Feel free to remove whichever one you think. Liridon (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done :-). The image is great, but I would have liked a longer description in Italian. And I wouldn't be afraid to add a description in English. --Laquearius (talk) 11:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It has default description that italian WLM APP inserts. I will add a more detailded description. Liridon (talk) 14:13, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Now it's better. Thanks. Laquearius (talk) 12:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia - Basilica di Santa Maria della Salute - 2023-09-14 18-33-04 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:29, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treviso - Porta San Tommaso - 2023-09-04 18-22-54 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulders Beach, Cape Town (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:19, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milano - Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II - 2023-09-15 17-54-50 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treviso - Chiesa di San Nicolò - 2023-09-09 12-20-44 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ktkvtsh 02:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate entry --Ktkvtsh 02:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Could you add a description in English? IMHO The description in Italian could be longer. --Laquearius 08:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Added detailed description, also in English.--Liridon 14:28, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Laquearius 15:10, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treviso - Ponte Dante - 2023-09-08 15-10-37 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilt/lacks perspective correction, the house on the left is leaning in --Poco a poco 06:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Uploaded new version. Fixed perspective. --Liridon 09:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia - Chiesa di San Geremia - 2023-09-08 16-13-33 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Laquearius 08:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milano - Duomo di Milano - 2023-09-15 19-10-22 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --~~~~
Unsigned votes are invalid. I stroke it out. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Previous signature did not displayed because of technical mistake. Good quality--Luda.slominska 07:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milano - Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II - 2023-09-15 17-54-50 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:14, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firenze - Cattedrale di Santa Maria del Fiore da Piazzale Michelangelo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looking better, thank you --Poco a poco 19:24, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treviso - Palazzo dei Trecento - 2023-09-24 12-34-03 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treviso - Chiesa di San Nicolò - 2023-09-09 12-20-44 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
perspective distortion, correction is needed. --F. Riedelio 08:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done fixed perspective.--Liridon 10:57, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 10:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zürich - Grossmünster - March 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pieve di Cadore - Palazzo della Magnifica comunità di Cadore - 2023-09-26 15-55-24 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pieve di Cadore - Palazzo della Magnifica comunità di Cadore - 2023-09-26 15-55-24 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pieve di Cadore - Chiesa di Santa Maria Nascente - 2023-09-26 18-13-24 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pieve di Cadore - Chiesa di Santa Maria Nascente - 2023-09-26 19-38-49 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia - Biblioteca nazionale Marciana - 2023-09-10 12-48-10 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 11:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treviso - Palazzo dei Trecento - 2023-09-24 12-34-03 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firenze - Cattedrale di Santa Maria del Fiore - 2023-09-26 13-17-23 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per aver partecipato a WikiLovesMonuments 2023 - Italia[edit]

(English version available here)

Ciao Liridon, grazie per aver partecipato all’edizione italiana di Wiki Loves Monuments 2023!

È stato un anno da record, con oltre 52.000 immagini caricate su Wikimedia Commons, di cui già 2.800 utilizzate sui progetti Wikimedia (numero destinato ad aumentare). Stiamo davvero documentando il patrimonio culturale italiano insieme!

In attesa del risultato dei lavori di selezione delle fotografie da parte delle giurie, ti chiediamo di dedicarci pochi minuti del tuo tempo per rispondere a un breve questionario (anonimo), che ci aiuterà a fare ancora meglio il prossimo anno: link al sondaggio sul limesurvey di Wikimedia Italia

Grazie ancora. --Ysogo(talk) 21:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treviso - Porta Santi Quaranta - 2023-09-28 18-00-11 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --[[User:--Sunny365days 07:34, 4 October 2023 (UTC)]][reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pieve di Cadore - Chiesa di Santa Maria Nascente - 2023-09-26 19-38-49 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:22, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treviso - Mura di Treviso - 2023-09-28 17-25-34 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pieve di Cadore - Chiesa di Santa Maria Nascente - 2023-09-26 19-38-49 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milano - Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II - 2023-09-15 17-54-50 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Plozessor 04:29, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treviso - Mura di Treviso - 2023-09-28 17-25-34 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I'd expect more specific categories (plaques?) --Poco a poco 07:22, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Added specific comments. --Liridon 08:35, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferry ship of Grimaldi Lines in the harbor of Barcelona 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
good quality but category is wrong and misleading, try Ciudad de Palma (ship, 2007) --Virtual-Pano 21:58, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done fixed the category.--Liridon 16:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality - (I have corrected the description) --Virtual-Pano 09:33, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treviso - Chiesa di San Giovanni Battista - 2023-09-28 22-35-12 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:40, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bologna - Santuario di Santa Maria della Vita - 2023-09-09 18-44-30 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 04:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023 - Nomination Phase[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

the 2023 board election of our group is run at

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023.

The next steps in the timeline for the 2023 election are

  • October 20 – November 16: Nomination phase for candidacies
  • November 17 – December 10: Elections
  • December 16: Results announced

If you are interested in being a member of the board, please nominate yourself on the Election Page.

We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

All the best

--Ailura (talk) for the CPUG board

Flickypedia soft launch and a huge thank you[edit]

Dear fellow Commons photographer,

I hope this message finds you well. As you might already know, the Flickr Foundation has been busy creating a new Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) this year. After a successful demo at the GLAM Wiki Conference in Montevideo, the Flickr Foundation team is now inviting all members of the Commons Photographers User Group to be the first to review their alpha, reporting any technical issues or other feedback via the Flickypedia project talk page.

At the same time, this message is an opportunity for me to thank you for your trust and support over the past couple of years. Since 2017, we've grown into being one of the largest user groups in the Wikimedia universe. I've tremendously enjoyed interacting with all of our members when it came to joint photowalks at Wikimanias, virtual Zoom meetings where we covered a wide variety of photography topics, as well as our annual “Most memorable shot of the year”, among many other events. As I'm not running for an official position in our current board election, this will be my last message on behalf of the user group to you. Thanks for all the happy moments we shared together over the years! I hope you'll continue creating free images for the millions of people we serve through Wikipedia and Commons.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Toscana[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

L'edizione 2023 di Wiki Loves Monuments si è conclusa.

Lo scorso anno non avevamo segnalato l'inizio del concorso perché abbiamo avuto delle metriche di adesione più alte rispetto agli ultimi anni, quindi incentivare il caricamento sarebbe stato controproducente per i partecipanti più occasionali.

Anche quest'anno l'adesione è stata alta (anzi nettamente più alta), probabilmente perché c'erano molte foto di chiese (la novità di quest'anno) negli archivi dei partecipanti storici e per questo non è stato inviato un messaggio durante settembre, mantenendo la strategia di massimizzare la promozione durante gli anni di minore partecipazione.

I finalisti son stati nel frattempo selezionati e annunciati. Qui troverete il riepiligo con i vincitori. Continuate a seguire i nostri canali social per ulteriori informazioni riguardanti la cerimonia di premiazione, che avrà luogo a Piombino nei prossimi mesi. Tutti i semifinalisti sono cordialmente invitati a partecipare.


per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista


Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

WikiToscana

Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki

toscanawiki

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2023 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2023 #WLM2023


Inviato da Alexmar983 usando MediaWiki message delivery

Category discussion warning

Site-specific installation by Dorotej Neshovski has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Prototyperspective (talk) 10:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deadline Approaching for Most Memorable Shot Submission![edit]

Hello Liridon !,

Camera1 mgx
Camera1 mgx
Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en
Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en

Just a quick reminder that the deadline for submitting your most memorable shot of 2023 is swiftly approaching! As tradition holds, since 2018, we've been sharing our favorite captures from the past year with each other. This year marks the sixth iteration of our beloved "Most Memorable Shot" tradition, and we're excited to see what everyone has to share.

Whether you're a member of the Commons Photographers User Group or not, you're warmly invited to participate. Your unique perspective adds to the richness of our community, and we'd love to see the world through your lens.

So, if you haven't already, take a moment to pick out your most cherished picture of 2023 and share it with us on the designated page. The deadline is February 29th, so don't let time slip away!

Let's keep this wonderful tradition alive and celebrate the beauty and diversity of our collective experiences through photography.

Looking forward to seeing your memorable shots!

Best regards,

Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Toscana - Premiazione[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

L'edizione 2023 di Wiki Loves Monuments si concluderà a breve con la cerimonia regionale.

I semifinalisti, come ogni edizione, sono invitati alla cerimonia di premiazione che quest'anno si terrà dalle 16:00 alle 18:00 di sabato 16 marzo p.v. a Piombino (LI) nella sala consiliare.

Come sempre, si consiglia di seguire i canali sociali.


per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista


Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

WikiToscana

Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki

toscanawiki

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2023 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2023 #WLM2023


Alexmar983 tramite --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on April 13, 2024[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 9.00 UTC ( start time in your timezone (via zoneStamp!) (expected duration for 2 hrs). The primary agenda of this gathering will revolve around discussions regarding the Movement Charter. Your valuable input and participation in these discussions would be highly appreciated. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on April 13, 2024.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you.

All the best, -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]