User talk:Liaon98

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Liaon98!

<onlyinclude>

File:BSicon_exvBHFq.svg已被列入刪除請求,社群將討論是否保留該內容。如果你能夠到這裡發表你對此的觀點,我們會重視此事。

如果這個討論頁是你創作的,請注意其被提議刪除並不一定表示我們不重視你善意的貢獻。這只是表示有人確信其有一些特殊的問題,例如著作權問題。請參閱共享資源:但這是我自己的作品!以了解如何解釋這些問題的指導。

請記得回應,並反駁提議刪除的意見(如果有必要的話)。提刪者的論點不會影響提刪的結果。感謝理解!

Erik Baas (talk) 18:53, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Idem: File:BSicon exvKBFe.svg, File:BSicon exvKBFl.svg and File:BSicon exvKBFr.svg. - Erik Baas (talk) 18:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

<onlyinclude>

File:BSicon_uexvBHF.svg已被列入刪除請求,社群將討論是否保留該內容。如果你能夠到這裡發表你對此的觀點,我們會重視此事。

如果這個討論頁是你創作的,請注意其被提議刪除並不一定表示我們不重視你善意的貢獻。這只是表示有人確信其有一些特殊的問題,例如著作權問題。請參閱共享資源:但這是我自己的作品!以了解如何解釋這些問題的指導。

請記得回應,並反駁提議刪除的意見(如果有必要的話)。提刪者的論點不會影響提刪的結果。感謝理解!

Erik Baas (talk) 19:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Idem: File:BSicon uexvBHFq.svg, File:BSicon uvBHF.svg and File:BSicon exvKBFa.svg. - Erik Baas (talk) 19:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SVG[edit]

1: Before trying to create SVG files, please have a look at the source of existing files, for example File:BSicon ABZlg.svg  :

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!-- Created by Erik Baas for Wikipedia -->
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="500" height="500" >
 <title>ABZlg</title>
 <g stroke="#be2d2c" stroke-width="100" fill="none">
  <path d="M250,0 V 500" />
  <circle cx="0" cy="500" r="250" />
 </g>
</svg>

2: Including another image from your local disk does not work when uploaded to commons.
3: SVG on wikibooks. - Erik Baas (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tainan City 2010 Location Map.png[edit]

不要自做聰明上傳新圖,2010年嘉義市縣、新竹市縣並沒有合併。--Koika (talk) 12:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

看來你完全狀況外。明年省轄市還在,維基百科條目都寫得很明白。簡單講就是馬先生的「三都十五縣」並沒有落實。--Koika (talk) 05:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


你好,Liaon98!
提示:给你的图像添加分类
提示:给你的图像添加分类

非常感谢你对维基共享资源的贡献!这里有个小提示,让你的上传更有用:给你的文件添加一些合适的分类,帮助更多人找到并使用它们。

方法如下:

1)当你使用上传向导时,你可以在编辑文件说明时给文件添加分类。只需单击文件的“更多选项”,然后添加合适的分类:

2)你也可以从你的上传列表中选择文件,编辑文件的说明页面,手工在页面结尾添加分类代码。

[[Category:分类名称]]

例如,上传一幅展示彗星轨道的图表,你可以添加以下代码:

[[Category:Astronomy diagrams]](天文学图表)
[[Category:Trap]]

这会让图表出现在“Astronomy diagrams”和“Trap”分类中。

当挑选分类时,请尝试选择具体的分类(如“Astronomical diagrams”(天文学图表))而不是过于宽泛的分类(如“Illustrations”(插图))。高级提示:CommonSense工具可以帮助你找到最适合你的图像的分类。

再次感谢你的上传!更多关于分类的信息可以在Commons:Categories查询,如果有疑问可随时前往帮助台询问。

BotMultichillT 18:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In this case it didn't work because it referenced an external image, and also because the "viewBox" was a little strange. Go to Commons:SVG Check to test... AnonMoos (talk) 17:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:KKP MRT.png[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:KKP MRT.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ben.MQ (talk) 15:21, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Liaon98, I found that the villages and township borders of Changzhi (長治鄉) have changed a little bit (File:Changzhi villages 2019.svg). Greetings --Furfur Diskussion 12:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Furfur: Hello, thanks for telling me. I think the matter is due to zh:三和村 (Sanhe Village) of zh:瑪家鄉 (Majia Township), which is an enclave. I just wrote a letter to National Land Surveying and Mapping Center to check this problem.--Liaon98 我是廢物 10:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Liaon, thanks, do you think it is an error of the National Land Surveying and Mapping Center then? or has the enclave been incorporated in Changzhi? --Furfur Diskussion 10:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Liaon, did you receive any answer? --Furfur Diskussion 15:26, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Furfur: NLSC just shirked the responsibility to local governments, they said they didn't notice the problems. NLSC said they had required local governments to check whether the maps are right. --Liaon98 我是廢物 14:42, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Liaon, ok, thank you. Do you think that you will get a second answer then (from Pingtung County government or Changzhi township)? --Furfur Diskussion 14:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Furfur: Probably not. I think NLSC will update the map silently or just pretend that nothing happened. That's what Taiwan government might do, LOL. --Liaon98 我是廢物 09:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I see ... so you think that the map with the enclave is still correct? I was wondering which map to choose in the article. --Furfur Diskussion 17:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Furfur: Mountain indigenous townships use different law from common townships, that why enclaves be established when aborigines relocated to common townships. So merging the enclaves would violate aborigines' right. So I think those enclaves still exist.--Liaon98 我是廢物 01:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Liaon98: , yes that's reasonable. For me it was also the question which map to use in the article. --Furfur Diskussion 15:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

新北市第一選區有誤。 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 180.218.88.141 (talk) 11:57, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

國道十號左營端?[edit]

在高鐵左營站附近的翠華路這座匝道

我看過高雄都會區快速道路此條目,發現你在這筆版本一開始創建就有寫;不過,我卻有個疑問……如果你寫的是正確,為什麼不見你提供來源?你那樣寫,其語氣是相當斷定高鐵左營站附近的翠華路那座匝道「不是」國道十號左營端,反而是告訴我,高雄都會區快速道路可無縫接上國道十號。在沒有來源的情況下,其實一般人沒辦法像你那樣分別,就連我也是會誤將那座匝道看成是國道十號左營端。因為左營端的情況有別於大家的認知,高速公路會叫xx端都是直接平面道路,再不然就是有匝道接上平面道路,像「國道十號旗山端」就是一例,因此叫左營端就會引人感到匪夷所思,更何況你都寫它是「無縫接上」,所以是不是存在左營端就更令人懷疑。如果左營端真的存在,而且你也能指出它的確切位置,那麼我對翠華路那座匝道判別是高雄都會區快速道路就容易很多。目前我在整理照片時,遇到問題就是這個,若不能解決的話,我就無法判斷是要歸類在國道十號還是在高雄都會區快速道路,希望請你幫忙。--Kai3952 (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]