User talk:Leonel Sohns/Archive 2,5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Microsoft Windows 10 error.png was recently deleted by Minorax for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Microsoft Windows 10 error.png

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 12:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:George-percy-abbott-sitting-bunk-11606728.webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Zaunwinde Wachstum.mpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Migebert (talk) 22:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi. In this edit, you changed the anchors I had carefully added to compensate for your previous edit. Please don't change anchors, as we need them for backward compatibility with shortcuts and other inbound links.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Note

Please stop nominating user (talk) pages for deletion unless there's a compelling reason to do so. Thanks. --Minoraxtalk 09:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for updating file:comparison_satellite_navigation_orbits.svg. Unfortunately, that caused text labels to become misaligned and the multilingual descriptions were removed. The path definitions and styles also become harder to read. I'm unclear what the improvement was; the previous version was also already considered valid by Commons:Commons_SVG_Checker. Can you please point out any deficiency in the previous version, and I'll fix it manually?

Thanks,
cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 19:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Inaccurate paleoart.jpg

The point of the file is to show inaccurate paleoart, that is why it was created in the first place. The image was updated to reflect this. So do not edit war over it for spurious reasons. The original file you keep reverting to is here[1], and since it is much less inaccurate than the image currently used, it is counter productive to revert it, and I'll have to temporarily protect the image from editing if you continue. FunkMonk (talk) 12:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

@FunkMonk: see Commons:Overwriting existing files. /Leonel Sohns 13:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
I'm not sure you understand what the purpose of that file is. I was part in developing the template that image was created for. An old dinosaur image was used for the template which was later replaced by a more appropriate image. The purpose of the image was to show the most inaccurate dinosaur image we could find, and to be clear at thumbnail size as well, and the new version is better at that. The original base image is still on Commons.[2] FunkMonk (talk) 13:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

That's a completely different image, such files are Commons:Overwriting existing files violations. Commons:Overwriting existing files is considered an official guideline on Wikimedia Commons. Upload the different image with new name please! /Leonel Sohns 15:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

After considering both your views and reading Commons:Overwriting existing files, may I suggest using the
Files marked as updateable (eg using the {{Current}} template) may be updated if appropriate
exemption by marking the file as updateable to the most appropriate image currently available, and keeping both versions without the hand icon as separate files? Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 16:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
But that's the thing, the underlying images[3][4] are already separate files. They were never intended to be replaced. The sole purpose of the modified image[5] in question is to be used in a single template, so there is no reason at all for keeping both versions with the stop sign on. It is a graphic for use in a single, specific template, that is the take home message here. I was part of getting the template made in the first place, the first image was pretty much just a placeholder made by the creator of the template. The overwriting existing files guideline does not apply in this case, because the base images are still available, and there is absolutely no conceivable reason why both versions of the stop sign graphic should be kept. FunkMonk (talk) 17:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Agreed. So how about marking it {{current}} and linking it in the description to those two files and any others that may improve it in the future? Thanks for the good work, btw, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 17:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Right now, the two files used are linked under source. FunkMonk (talk) 19:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Inaccurate paleoart.jpg has not been marked as updateable. /Leonel Sohns 20:30, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Qiàn-061.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FanNihongo (talk) 06:13, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

File:SMB2 titlescreen logo.webp has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

File:TRON 9-9237.png was recently deleted

File:TRON 9-9237.png was recently deleted by Sealle for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Deleted old revision 20200921183111!TRON_9-9237.png: Uncontroversial maintenance (G6)

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 18:44, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:TRON 9-935A.png was recently deleted

File:TRON 9-935A.png was recently deleted by Sealle for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Deleted old revision 20200921183935!TRON_9-935A.png: Uncontroversial maintenance (G6)

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:13, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:TRON 9-9231.png was recently deleted

File:TRON 9-9231.png was recently deleted by Sealle for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Deleted old revision 20200921184206!TRON_9-9231.png: Uncontroversial maintenance (G6)

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:13, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:TRON 9-9161.png was recently deleted

File:TRON 9-9161.png was recently deleted by Sealle for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Deleted old revision 20200921182949!TRON_9-9161.png: Uncontroversial maintenance (G6)

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:TRON 9-934C.png was recently deleted

File:TRON 9-934C.png was recently deleted by Sealle for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Deleted old revision 20200921184054!TRON_9-934C.png: Uncontroversial maintenance (G6)

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:28, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:TRON 9-9337.png was recently deleted

File:TRON 9-9337.png was recently deleted by Sealle for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Deleted old revision 20200921183811!TRON_9-9337.png: Uncontroversial maintenance (G6)

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:TRON 9-932E.png was recently deleted

File:TRON 9-932E.png was recently deleted by Sealle for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Deleted old revision 20200921183641!TRON_9-932E.png: Uncontroversial maintenance (G6)

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:Personal file deletion has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Achim (talk) 18:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Leeenfield-mk1-no.5-3.webp has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:19, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

‘Modern forms’

Please, never upload ‘modern forms’ of cyrillic letters again. You do it incorrectly: letters are larger than they have been intended to be, and the base you use has been originally created for digraphs (it is wider than the normal one). Also I was planning to overwrite the older files (not yours), changing the font from ‘Universalia’ to ‘Times New Roman’ (I already did it with some of Latin letters), but then your files will become just incorrect duplicates of them. So, please, don’t do that. — Person or Persons Unknown (talk)
(contrib.)
15:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:New view of the tree of life.webp. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:New view of the tree of life.webp]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Deformation of a ferromagnetic material under magnetic force due to rotating permanent magnet.opus was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deformation of a ferromagnetic material under magnetic force due to rotating permanent magnet.opus

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 22:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union (logo).svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Yours sincerely, /Leonel Sohns 20:23, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Why you everted my edit?

Hello. I am here to asking about why did you reverting my edit? I was updating that page using {{Lle}} and nothing wrong there. Could you please clarify the reason of that please? — 𝙋𝙖𝙩𝙨𝙖𝙜𝙤𝙧𝙣 𝙔.ᴛᴀʟᴋ 15:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Scherzo bwv844.mid

Copyright status: File:Scherzo bwv844.mid

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Scherzo bwv844.mid. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Augmented chord.mid

Copyright status: File:Augmented chord.mid

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Augmented chord.mid. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:07, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

DRs

Hi. Please stop making fatuous DRs like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zirkel2.gif, they are disruptive.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

File copyright status

Information icon Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:05, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Edit war in page Hebrew calendar.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Sgeo.wav has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

File:United States Army Flag.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Template:Please choose a appropriate username has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Achim (talk) 15:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Warning

Please stop creating templates, especially threatening ones, until you can do that correctly. Also, your statement "This user will be soon an administrator" is incorrect as far as I am concerned.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:21, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Please remain calm and collegial

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  עברית  +/−


It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 07:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Categories with incorrect category names has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


75.110.62.12 22:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove the superseded category

Hi Leonel Sohns. There is a reason we move files to the superseded category, and that is because we have a better version on Commons. No need for a good and an inferior version of the same item. So please do not remove the category and reinstate the files in the original categories, where they are no longer needed. Examples: File:Branden i Kiøbenhavn d. 5. Juny 1795. Nr. 2.png and File:Peter Vilhelm Ilsted (Danish artist, 1861-1933) Girls at Window.jpg. Unless you have compelling reasons for these edits, they should be reverted. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 20:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Recaman.mid has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:48, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Gabbie Hanna Honestly Encore Sample.wav has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:57, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Lehran logo.xcf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:01, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--IN (talk) 12:15, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

STOP MESSING WITH TEMPLATES!

This edit undid much work by Admins to combat errant editing of Template:Speedynote. You have been warned.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit Summary

When editing a page on Commons there is a small field labeled "Edit Summary" or "Summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the Edit Summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the Edit Summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's name in the Edit Summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Paintingprocessprocreate.mpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Paintingprocessprocreate.mpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Микола Василечко (talk) 20:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Cancha Liceo de San José.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pibwl (talk) 20:30, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

COM:AN/B

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections#Leonel Sohns. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 20:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Fairytale key enter 2-2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The SVG Effect (talk) 20:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Leonel Sohns. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

I am so sorry Leonel Sohns 14:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Mass Template modification

Hi, are you sure that your {{subst:lle}} modification is useful? It makes the templates less general and imply that we will need to replace the explicit url in each one of them when necessary instead of changing just one template. Ruthven (msg) 10:08, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

File:KlauberTriangle.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:35, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Fixed invalid XML.

@Leonel Sohns: I saw you fixed several invalid XML, most of them can be fixed using a bot, how do you detect them?  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)