User talk:Laserlicht

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search 

Archive

Du erhältst einen Orden![edit]

Der Fleißorden
Für deine tollen Bilder und deine Arbeiten im Kategoriesystem. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 11:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Triplec85: Vielen Lieben Dank dafür! :)
--Laserlicht (talk) 00:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Datum der Landauf-Landapp-Fotos[edit]

Hi! Bei dem Foto File:Landappbw 477733 1823 Eisenbahnbrücke Germersheim.jpg fiel mir auf, dass sich das Datum in der Commons-Datei (9.8.) von dem auf der Website (8.8.) unterscheidet. Kann es sein, dass das Datum des Uploads auf der Leo-BW-Website bzw. der App übernommen wird? Dann sollte es hier noch mit {{Original upload date|jjjj-mm-dd}} gekennzeichnet werden. Noch viel besser wäre natürlich, das Aufnahmedatum zu übernehmen (dann mit taken on). VG P170 (talk) 08:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo @P170:
Ja, damals war das über die API nicht möglich. Mittlerweile gibt es ein Feld in der API und dieses wird nun auch auf dem Web-Interface angezeigt (früher war das auch das Hochlade-Datum).
Ich kann die Bild-Infos mal aktualisieren. Macht es Sinn beide Zeitangaben (Templates) in das Datumsfeld aufzunehmen?
--Laserlicht (talk) 19:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anlässlich Deiner Frage habe ich mal die Beschreibung des Templates Original Upload Date gelesen: "used for files moved from another Wikimedia projects" ... "should be used only if the creation date of the file is unknown". Wusste ich beides nicht. In der Praxis werden die Aussagen nicht immer wörtlich genommen (und mindestens ersteres würde ich am liebsten grundsätzlich mal zur Disposition stellen, da das Template genau im Landauf-Landapp-Fall bei nicht vorhandenem Aufnahmdatum sinnvoll gewesen wäre), aber können wir hier ja so machen. Also nur Aufnahmedatum. Danke und VG P170 (talk) 08:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Scheint sich doch als schwieriger herauszustellen... Beispiel: c:File:Landappbw_100990_1819_Museum_Hüsli_Grafenhausen.jpg - Datensatz von LandAppBW. Scheint nicht der einzige Fall zu sein... Hmm... Ich weiß nicht, ob die neuen Datumsangaben verlässlicher sind. Scheint noch eines der frühen Bilder zu sein. Vielleicht doch besser überall "Original Upload Date" nehmen? --Laserlicht (talk) 00:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ich setze die Datumsangaben nun auf {{Original upload date|jjjj-mm-dd}}, alles andere passt nicht...
--Laserlicht (talk) 13:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remsmühle in Waiblingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remsmühle in Waiblingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Laserlicht&oldid=875010648"