User talk:LX/Archive/2015: July to September

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussions from User talk:LX have been archived. Please do not change them. Any further comments, even if they deal with a matter discussed below, should be made at User talk:LX.

Subrapubic catheter[edit]

This discussion has been moved back to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections#User:Terryyes15 sockpuppets. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. LX (talk, contribs) 05:41, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Imágenes[edit]

Hola, estaba revisando el artículo Comunicaciones y me dí cuenta que las imágenes aparecen como trabajo propio, cuando estas están sacadas de Comunicaciones, son violaciones, también su contenido, no es neutral. Gracias --ElisonSeg (talk) 21:41, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola! I don't really speak Spanish, but if I understand correctly, you're saying that the images used in es:Comunicaciones Fútbol Club appear to be copyright violations. It looks like they were all uploaded by one user, and I've created Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fr4nc0svr. In the future, please report this type of issue somewhere where more people will see it – either by creating a deletion nomination yourself, or by reporting it at the Administrators' noticeboard, the copyright Village Pump or the Spanish Village Pump. Neutrality issues with the article is a matter for the folks over at Spanish Wikipedia, but it looks like the article has the corresponding problem tag. Cheers, LX (talk, contribs) 07:29, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Admin[edit]

Hi, You ever considered becoming a admin? I would be happy to nominate you. Best. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:26, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Steinsplitter! Pehaps you remember this? Thanks again, though. :) LX (talk, contribs) 14:33, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I sent you a mail :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:42, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions of user:Usamasaad[edit]

This discussion has been moved back to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Usamasaad. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. LX (talk, contribs) 12:13, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry![edit]

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Batiba#Copyright violations. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. LX (talk, contribs) 15:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These files[edit]

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Diego Grez-Cañete#File tagging File:Niza Catalán, presidenta del CCAA LARE 2012.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. LX (talk, contribs) 19:37, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with Template:Qfi[edit]

Template currently lacks link search options for https protocol. Maybe it's possible to rebuild the template so link searches are only done for links starting with flickr.com, excluding protocols et al. @Martin H., Rillke, and Steinsplitter: requesting further input/ideas. I hope there's an easy solution.--Denniss (talk) 22:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I've tried fixing it. I think this should work. Let me know if anything seems broken. LX (talk, contribs) 11:23, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have received two emails about an image[edit]

"File:Mapa-del-Pays-Caribe.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation" Right know I cannot access to that images, could you send me to me, because in this moment I really cannot remain it. but I could tell you, that it, and two proposal flags that I created, were a part of a political process to get more autonomy in the Caribbean region of Colombia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jyemail (talk • contribs) 00:57, 2 September 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

I haven't sent you any e-mail. I tagged File:Mapa-del-Pays-Caribe.jpg for deletion as a copyright violation 5½ years ago and notified you on the user talk page of the account you used to upload it. User talk:Jaimeyemail. (I see that you have also created an account called Yemailjaime. Is there a reason why you need so many accounts?) Depending on your settings, that may have triggered an e-mail notification, but it would have been sent back then, not now.
I cannot send you the file. It has been deleted, and only administrators can access deleted content. From looking at the log for the file, it was a copyright violation, because it was a screenshot of non-free Google Maps content. LX (talk, contribs) 05:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for your help at Commons:Help desk‎. ~ DanielTom (talk) 19:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to be at your service! LX (talk, contribs) 19:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Page[edit]

This discussion has been moved back to Commons:Help desk#Editing Problem. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. LX (talk, contribs) 14:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eights weeks and still no resolution[edit]

Hej LX, you suggested me to report a problem with the interpretation of image EXIF information on Phabricator. You also pointed out where the problem was, I guess there is just two lines of codes that need to be swapped in the Exif.php file. This was eight weeks ago. Do you have any suggestion on how to get something to happen with T107717? Are there any statistics available showing which kind of resolution time that can be expected for bugs with priority Low? --Larske (talk) 11:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I really don't know what the holdup is. It seems the developers are as always too busy working on unwanted features to fix even the simplest of bugs even when you hand them everything on a silver platter. :-( I don't know about statistics, and I'm not as familiar with Phabricator as I was with Bugzilla that was used earlier, but it looks like only eight Commons issues with low priority have ever been resolved since Phabricator was introduced over a year ago. LX (talk, contribs) 12:09, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]