User talk:LX/Archive/2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Q1[edit]

The following discussions from User talk:LX have been archived. Please do not change them. Any further comments, even if they deal with a matter discussed below, should be made at User talk:LX.

File:Onoguria.jpg[edit]

Request to delete File Onoguria.jpg I brought myself - Meliska, as the author but it was mistakenly. For that I apologize. Thank you for your understanding.--Meliska (talk) 16:16, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The proper place to comment is Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Meliska. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Teamwork Barnstar
謝謝您的關愛！ 謝長融 (talk) 12:31, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:קברו של שאול ביבר בבית הקברות בגבעת השלושה צילום אלי אלון.jpg[edit]

Hello Alex,

The photographer, and the author of the article are the same person. I dont think that there is problem here. -- Geagea (talk) 13:09, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is, of course, generally no way of knowing who is behind a certain user account, except Commons:OTRS permission. Other uploads by the user have full resolution and intact metadata from a Canon PowerShot A630. This photo has no metadata, the exact same web resolution dimensions as the version previously published at http://cafe.themarker.com/post/3147746/. As an alternative to OTRS, a full-resolution photo with intact metadata would suffice. If the uploader is indeed the photographer, that shouldn't be a problem. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:23, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article http://cafe.themarker.com/post/3147746/ written by him (אלי אלון - Eli Alon). All filename contain the words "photo by Eli Alon" (Alon=אלון). -- Geagea (talk) 07:40, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If that's indeed the case, then there's a third option: mention the license in that article. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
license mentioned in that article? -- Geagea (talk) 08:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's hard to know what you're asking when you don't use complete sentences. What I'm saying is that if the uploader wrote the article at http://cafe.themarker.com/post/3147746/, then he should presumably be able to edit it. If he does that and adds "This photo is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license" (or equivalent in Hebrew), then that will resolve the permission issue. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:10, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Supercatwalk[edit]

Hi! Just to inform you, seeing your request at OTRS/Noticeboard: If this helps (not really OTRS-related):

Both files tagged with no permission. I have done this more technically (awaiting a whatsoever reaction) because the user behind https://twitter.com/BobbyJohnson___ is aware that files he posted on Twitter are also available at Commons, considering (e.g.) https://twitter.com/BobbyJohnson___/status/533945494549307392/photo/1 or https://twitter.com/BobbyJohnson___/status/533947241833046016/photo/1... Gunnex (talk) 21:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. My guess the uploader is either the subject himself or a paid editor acting on his behalf, but whatever the case, they obviously can't claim to be the author of photos that they didn't personally create. I also noticed some Twitter matches while running some Google image searches, but I figured there were enough questions already. As you say, it doesn't really change the OTRS situation one way or another. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:40, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Started Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Supercatwalk. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:26, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...[edit]

...for fixing my typo. - Jmabel ! talk 23:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. :) —LX (talk, contribs) 07:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of copyright images![edit]

【TiCA15】《進擊的巨人》阿爾敏聲優簽名會 井上麻里奈雀躍分享配音心得《Attack on Titan Season 2》 - 巴哈姆特
【TiCA15】《Fate/stay night》遠坂凜聲優植田佳奈簽名會 現場嶄露傲嬌橋段《Fate/stay night [Unlimited Blade Works》 - 巴哈姆特]
【TpGS 15】萬代南夢宮邀請日本知名偶像「板野友美」於攤位與粉絲互動 - 巴哈姆特

--61.228.225.197 14:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how that has anything to do with me. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:43, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not understanding the rules[edit]

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Sixpacz#Copyright violations. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liedkunst Husum.JPG[edit]

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Mehlauge#File:Liedkunst Husum.JPG. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temis CH.jpg[edit]

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:YanikB#File:Temis CH.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:55, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Biting newbies[edit]

I know it's tempting, but do be a bit kind. [1] Who knows, he might be writing from a CDC 6400 and have no choice in the matter... - Jmabel ! talk 21:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He or she has been around for 10 months and seems to be capable of writing normally on other pages, so I'm not sure about the newbie label. I did say "please", and I thought the rest was rather matter-of-fact. But I'll try my best to sugarcoat it a bit next time. Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 23:36, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
10 months? Yup, he should probably know better. - Jmabel ! talk 04:33, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:SC430-B10-direct drive.jpg[edit]

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Gypaete09#File tagging File:SC430-B10-direct drive.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:00, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This should be sorted now - see *my* talk page (that exists now). btw the discussion did not start on that page - I had to create it just for that occasion. Johan Prins — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.140.141.7 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 29 March 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Gypaete09 has existed since 27 September 2013‎, and the discussion started there. Maybe you had trouble finding it because you keep editing without being logged in. In that case, the Special:MyTalk link will point to the talk page of the IP address that you're editing from. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Q2[edit]

The following discussions from User talk:LX have been archived. Please do not change them. Any further comments, even if they deal with a matter discussed below, should be made at User talk:LX.

Help Desk link to undeletion discussion[edit]

Hello, LX! Just noting that I took the liberty of changing the UDR link in your recent Help Desk posting; it was pointing to the section beneath the one where you had made a similar comment, so I assume you just mis-selected while copying it. Hope you don‘t mind.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks! Don't know how I managed to mess that up. —LX (talk, contribs) 05:51, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gazetteer[edit]

Hej! Du flyttade kategorin från singular till plural. Tanken var att kategorin skulle utgöra "The Gazetteer" genom att samla digitaliserade källor som innehåller geografisk information men som inte själva nödvändigtvis utgör "gazetteers". Det är möjligt att det är mindre bra tänkt och att ordet inte kan användas så på engelska. Edaen (talk) 18:56, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... kanske borde kollat med dig först. :o) Jag får erkänna att jag inte hade hört ordet tidigare och var tvungen att kolla upp det. Det kan säkert användas på det sättet, men jag tror att det ändå behöver sättas in i ett sammanhang – något i stil med Category:WikiAtlas och Atlas of Sweden, fast med ickekartografiskt geografiskt fokus. Var det något sånt du tänkte dig? —LX (talk, contribs) 19:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, precis. Kategorin var tänkt att samla textkällor som är relevanta för geografiska artiklar på Wikipedia, Wikidata och OpenHistoricalMap. Edaen (talk) 19:35, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okej. Då låter det som att en gallerisida egentligen vore lämpligare än en kategori, så att man kan skapa lite sammanhang – återigen i likhet med Atlas of Sweden. Håller du med? Kategorierna jag skapade (i alla fall de överordnade) kan nog få vara kvar ändå; de verkar också behövas. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:27, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kategorin kan komma att bli väldigt stor och borde nog i sinom tid delas upp på underkategorier. T. ex SCB:s folkräkningar, regeringsbeslut om kommunindelningar eller beslut om församlingsindelningar i Stockholm. Jag har ingen bestämd uppfattning om underkategorier ännu utan det får ge sig när det finns tillräckligt med material i huvudkategorin. Edaen (talk) 15:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, jag återskapat kategorin och lagt till en liten beskrivning. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, vad bra. Edaen (talk) 16:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for response, even in English. The important thing is we have resources that enable our communication. With your help getting success and my photos were published in Wikimedia commons! (Gervásio, Brazil). Gervásio Carvalho (talk) 19:19, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Obrigado! I'm glad I could help. Given the size and importance of Serra da Capivara National Park, we can definitely use more illustrations related to it, so those are valuable contributions. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:56, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:CryOCed#Copyright violations. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:22, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Barnstar of Diplomacy
Congrats for being respectful. HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 07:46, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thanks for trying to help me under my request... I don't where I can click to send you a private message, neither how to get in touch with a proper authority to request my files to be deleted.

I appreciate your time. ERICK DUQUE (EDKH) HOW CAN I DELETE MY ACCOUNT (talk) 07:48, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re:[edit]

This discussion has been moved back to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by 8Dodo8. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:41, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I asked the users of a forum to help me with images. Is it ok if they add this texts next to the photos that they add? And what am I supposed to do after I obtain them?

I hereby affirm that [I, (name here), am] the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the media.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. 8Dodo8 (talk) 09:48, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard to say anything definitive without knowing more about the specifics. Normally, the e-mail template should be filled in and sent in via e-mail according to the instructions at Commons:OTRS. If previous online publications have a clear licensing statement, linking to it and adding {{Licensereview}} may be sufficient, but if it's the kind of forum where anyone may register an account anonymously, an e-mail may still be needed to verify the licensor's identity. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:11, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Q3[edit]

The following discussions from User talk:LX have been archived. Please do not change them. Any further comments, even if they deal with a matter discussed below, should be made at User talk:LX.

Subrapubic catheter[edit]

This discussion has been moved back to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections#User:Terryyes15 sockpuppets. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 05:41, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Imágenes[edit]

Hola, estaba revisando el artículo Comunicaciones y me dí cuenta que las imágenes aparecen como trabajo propio, cuando estas están sacadas de Comunicaciones, son violaciones, también su contenido, no es neutral. Gracias --ElisonSeg (talk) 21:41, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola! I don't really speak Spanish, but if I understand correctly, you're saying that the images used in es:Comunicaciones Fútbol Club appear to be copyright violations. It looks like they were all uploaded by one user, and I've created Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fr4nc0svr. In the future, please report this type of issue somewhere where more people will see it – either by creating a deletion nomination yourself, or by reporting it at the Administrators' noticeboard, the copyright Village Pump or the Spanish Village Pump. Neutrality issues with the article is a matter for the folks over at Spanish Wikipedia, but it looks like the article has the corresponding problem tag. Cheers, —LX (talk, contribs) 07:29, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Admin[edit]

Hi, You ever considered becoming a admin? I would be happy to nominate you. Best. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:26, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Steinsplitter! Pehaps you remember this? Thanks again, though. :) —LX (talk, contribs) 14:33, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I sent you a mail :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:42, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions of user:Usamasaad[edit]

This discussion has been moved back to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Usamasaad. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:13, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry![edit]

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Batiba#Copyright violations. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These files[edit]

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Diego Grez-Cañete#File tagging File:Niza Catalán, presidenta del CCAA LARE 2012.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:37, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with Template:Qfi[edit]

Template currently lacks link search options for https protocol. Maybe it's possible to rebuild the template so link searches are only done for links starting with flickr.com, excluding protocols et al. @Martin H., Rillke, and Steinsplitter: requesting further input/ideas. I hope there's an easy solution.--Denniss (talk) 22:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I've tried fixing it. I think this should work. Let me know if anything seems broken. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:23, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have received two emails about an image[edit]

"File:Mapa-del-Pays-Caribe.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation" Right know I cannot access to that images, could you send me to me, because in this moment I really cannot remain it. but I could tell you, that it, and two proposal flags that I created, were a part of a political process to get more autonomy in the Caribbean region of Colombia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jyemail (talk • contribs) 00:57, 2 September 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

I haven't sent you any e-mail. I tagged File:Mapa-del-Pays-Caribe.jpg for deletion as a copyright violation 5½ years ago and notified you on the user talk page of the account you used to upload it. User talk:Jaimeyemail. (I see that you have also created an account called Yemailjaime. Is there a reason why you need so many accounts?) Depending on your settings, that may have triggered an e-mail notification, but it would have been sent back then, not now.
I cannot send you the file. It has been deleted, and only administrators can access deleted content. From looking at the log for the file, it was a copyright violation, because it was a screenshot of non-free Google Maps content. —LX (talk, contribs) 05:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for your help at Commons:Help desk‎. ~ DanielTom (talk) 19:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to be at your service! —LX (talk, contribs) 19:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Page[edit]

This discussion has been moved back to Commons:Help desk#Editing Problem. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eights weeks and still no resolution[edit]

Hej LX, you suggested me to report a problem with the interpretation of image EXIF information on Phabricator. You also pointed out where the problem was, I guess there is just two lines of codes that need to be swapped in the Exif.php file. This was eight weeks ago. Do you have any suggestion on how to get something to happen with T107717? Are there any statistics available showing which kind of resolution time that can be expected for bugs with priority Low? --Larske (talk) 11:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I really don't know what the holdup is. It seems the developers are as always too busy working on unwanted features to fix even the simplest of bugs even when you hand them everything on a silver platter. :-( I don't know about statistics, and I'm not as familiar with Phabricator as I was with Bugzilla that was used earlier, but it looks like only eight Commons issues with low priority have ever been resolved since Phabricator was introduced over a year ago. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:09, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Q4[edit]

The following discussions from User talk:LX have been archived. Please do not change them. Any further comments, even if they deal with a matter discussed below, should be made at User talk:LX.

Camerino Farnese[edit]

Hi, I want to ask a question please: this photograph may be published on Wikicommons? It is true that the surface of the roof is concave, but the paintings on it are obviously two-dimensional (I think) ... What is your opinion? Thanks for collaboration--Never covered (talk) 13:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Never covered! I'm afraid I'd have to say no, unless the photographer is willing to release the photo under a free license. The issue is that the photographer obviously had to make a decision about where to place the camera and how to angle it. The result of that decision is that the photographer holds the copyright to this particular depiction of the painting. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

okay... thanks for the reply... cordially--Never covered (talk) 18:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi excuse me for the trouble: I wanted to ask you another information. I did this picture with my camera, photographing the page of a book: I can legitimately upload it on Wikicommons or not? Thank you--Never covered (talk) 14:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again Never covered! No trouble at all – asking is the right thing to if you're unsure (although I do recommend the help desk – I may not always be around to answer). The answer to your question is most likely no. The person who created the original photograph of the sculpture has the right to specify who may use their photo and how it may be used. Your photo is a derivative work of the original photo, and the original photographer's copyright still applies. It looks like the original photograph is quite recent, so it's unlikely that the original photographer's copyright has expired. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I feared so, but tell me one more thing: if the originally photo had been related to a bidiminensional work (drawing, painiting ecc.), there would be no problems: am I right or wrong? thanks for your kind availability. un saluto--Never covered (talk) 18:33, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, it would depend on the copyright status of the drawing or painting. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag for details. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ok, tank you--Never covered (talk) 18:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hi, sorry for another request. I would like to upload this photo. I understand that I cant do it themselves, because depicts not a two-dimensional object. But if I ask permission to the holders of the picture (http://www.genusbononiae.it/) and they agree, I can publish it? In that case, how can I prove that they were authorized?. I hope to be able to understand me. Tank you very match --Never covered (talk) 10:25, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the copyright holder agrees to publish the photo under a license that allows anyone to use, modify, and redistribute it for any purpose, including commercial purposes, you should use this process to document that. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:40, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright tag[edit]

Hej! Jag håller på och expanderar en artikel om Mästermyrskistan och kollade vad det kunde finnas för bilder. Själva fotona på kistan och föremålen tillhör ju Historiska museet och är skyddade, men det finns en hel hög teckningar i anteckningsboken från själva upptäckten dvs 1936. Dessa sidor är inskannade och finns att ladda ned. Dom är alla märkta med "Public Domain" se ex 1 och ex 2. Jag tänkte ladda upp dom på Commons, men jag kan bara inte klura ut vilken licens jag ska använda. Kan du hjälpa mig att föreslå vilken som är bäst? w.carter-Talk 19:34, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hej w.carter! Det knepiga här är att Historiska museet inte talar om på vilken grund de har märkt verken med Public Domain Mark. För bilder från Flickr med motsvarande märkning har vi {{Flickr-public domain mark}}, som indikerar att mer information krävs för att de inte ska raderas. Upphovsrättens giltighet i Sverige är generellt 70 år från det att den som skapat verket avlidit ({{PD-old-70}}), eller från första publiceringen om skaparen är okänd ({{PD-anon-70-EU}}, {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}, {{PD-anon-70}}; jag har inte sett någon bra förklaring till varför vi har så många mallar för samma sak). Jag kan inte avgöra baserat på informationen på de länkade bildsidorna vad som eventuellt skulle kunna vara fallet här. Kanske museet kan bistå med ett förtydligande? —LX (talk, contribs) 16:56, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tack för försöket i alla fall. Det var ungefär de licenserna jag hade kollat på men inte kunnat reda ut. Jag ska kontakta museet som du föreslog. Ha en trevlig kväll, w.carter-Talk 17:04, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hej igen! Alltid lär man sig något nytt. Jag har nu fått svar från Historiska Museet och det visar sig att dom betraktar dom som dokument:
  • Gällande alla våra skannade kataloger så har vi resonerat så att det rör sig om dokumentation av samlingarna och är ”allmän handling”. Därför har vi valt att även släppa även den ”digitala kopian” som Public Domain.

Det är alltså {{PD-Sweden-URL9}} som gäller här. Bör jag ange någonstans att jag fått de här uppgifterna från museet eller räcker det med att bara ange licensen? w.carter-Talk 15:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Menar de alltså att det är fråga om ett yttrande av en myndighet? (För en författning eller ett beslut är det ju inte.) Statens historiska museer är en myndighet, men att att det här skulle utgöra ett yttrande känns spontant lite märkligt. Fast jag kan inte tolka det på något annat sätt. Permission-fältet i Information-mallen känns som ett lämpligt ställe att citera korrespondensen. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Jepp, enligt dom så gäller det "dokument och publikationer som ges ut av myndigheter och statliga verk, exempelvis handböcker, lagkommentarer, upplysningstidskrifter och informativa publikationer" där "upphovsmannens namn ofta inte är känt utan myndigheten står som avsändare". Jag gör en hänvisning till allt detta där du föreslog. De inskannade sidorna är ju till största delen text, skisserna I dom är mer en bisak och räknas tydligen inte som några större artistiska verk. Utöver det så handlar det ju om en slags kataloger, och sådana har ju bara en copyright på 15 år I Sverige. Dom var dessutom mycket glada över att artikeln och andra artiklar som rör museet blir skrivna, så det kändes väldigt positivt. Bad mig även att titta in och plåta saker själv om jag hade vägarna förbi. Bara att sätta igång och ladda upp. w.carter-Talk 22:04, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm having a problem[edit]

Hi there. I seem to have caused a problem here and I'm sure how to fix it. Sorry, I forgot about what happened with File:Tseax vent 2013.jpeg. I also accidentally uploaded the first file under a different file name here so now there is an exact duplicate. I will upload the different figure under a different file name. Volcanoguy (talk) 23:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really sure what it is you want to achieve. You've marked File:20151113231003!Level Mountain diagram.png as a duplicate of File:Level Mountain diagram.png, but it's really a duplicate of the first version of that file. In the file history section of File:Level Mountain diagram.png, you can see the two different versions that you have uploaded, and if you want to restore it to the first version, just press the "revert" link next to it. You might need assistance from an administrator to sort this out. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine I sorted it out myself. Volcanoguy (talk) 14:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Antonio3.14[edit]

Answered here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Antonio3.14 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antonio3.14 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 26 December 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LX/Archive/2015&oldid=251419676"