User talk:Kurpfalzbilder.de/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Category:Choirs (architecture) in Spain, Category:church galleries in Spain and Category:apses in Spain

These categories are still as you categorised. I have already explained the use and origin of these "high choirs" which makes them proper choirs and that they are called choirs in every architectural book and publication I have readed. I do have in this case an strong opinion about this matter. Please, feel free to ask any question or doubt you have about these elements. The chevet [1] [2] [3] may be the best specifical term for the "head" of a church which may not be curve. Ábside in Spanish means only the curved chevet, and cabecera (chevet) is a general word for any shape. In English this is not that clear, and I have found several places where apse is used for any shape of the eastern end of a church. Anyway, the doubt would be between apse and chevet, and choir wouldn´t be correct at all for Spanish churches, as this term envolves that specifical use of a choir. As I told you before, the use of a choir is not at all common for the Spanish chevets. The choirs were usually located at the base or in the middle of the central nave. Other locations may be found, of course, but it doesn´t justify to name all the chevets "choirs", because this would be false. I know that in other architectural traditions most of the choirs were at the chevet, behind the altar, and, mainly in North European Romanesque and Carolingian Pre-Romanesque there existed galleries at the westwerk, the west end of the church, but assuming literally those schemes to Spanish architecture is a big error. Please, read entry in the links I left in my last intervention about this matter. It is important to correct this if you are doing this systematical and hard work with Spanish churches, in order not to do useless work that has to be corrected afterwards. Cheers!--Balbo (talk) 12:25, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

o.k. I will swich to Chevet instead of choir for the cabecera. But the west gallery can't be translated to choir even when it's called coro in Hispanic. So 'choir is at least just the high choir (liturgigal place) and is used correctly for cathedrals in England, see Category:Choirs (architecture) in the United Kingdom. --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 13:55, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Most of the Images from the category Choirs (architecture) in Spain are moved now to Category:Chevets in Spain --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 17:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Congrats

Just wanted to say you are doing a really great job with the classification of the architectural elements of Spanish churches. Cheers, --ecelan (talk) 08:59, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank´s for your very good job. Estou aprendendo muito. Parabéns. --Lansbricae (Ti dirás) 18:40, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Casamar -> Casamor

Hallo Kurpfalzbilder, kannst du mir bitte behilflich sein, folgende beiden Bilder umzubennenen?

Santa Romà de Casamar 20080917a.jpg -> Santa Romà de Casamor 20080917a.jpg
Santa Romà de Casamar 20080917b.jpg -> Santa Romà de Casamor 20080917b.jpg

Also statt "Casamar" jeweils "Casamor", da diese romanische Kirche (oder besser Ruine) in realiter "Casamor" heißt.


Herzlichen Dank und viele Grüße Insbesondere auch Dank für das Ordnen der Kategorie: Romanik in Spanien

Sordmut (talk) 22:24, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Hallo Sordmut. Umbenennen können letztlich nur die Admins. Du Kannst nur das Bild unter neuem Namen Hochladen und beim alten einen Löschatntrag mit dem Template {{bad name|EinVielEinfallsreichererName.jpg}} stellen. Die genaue Anleitung findest Du hier. Gruss, --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 22:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Vielen Dank für die Info Wamito (talk) 17:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Category:Sant Cristòfol de Beget

Hallo Kurpfalzbilder,

die Kategorie "Category:Sant Cristòfol de Beget" trägt einen falschen Namen. Sie müsste korrekt nach der Kirche folgendermaßen lauten: "Category:Sant Cristòfor de Beget". Ich kenne die Kirche und habe sogar ein Buch über diese vor mir liegen. Kann man den Kategorienamen dies korrigieren. Herzliche Grüße Sordmut (talk) 18:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Bei so kleinen Kategorien geht das manuell noch ganz flott. Alle Bilder in der neuen Kategorie einsortieren und die nun leere alte Kategorie entkategorisieren und einen Schnell-Löschantrag stellen : {{Speedydelete|Grund für die Löschung}} Ich habs für Sant Cristòfor de Beget jetzt schon selber gemacht. Gruss --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 20:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Berge Graubündens

Hallo Kurpfalzbilder! ich wollte hier die kat "Mountains in Graubünden" ersetzen durch die Kat "Mountains in the canton of Graubünden", analog der Liste links. Meine neue kat taucht wohl auf (rechts), aber eben nicht dort, wo ich sie haben will; ich blick da nicht ganz durch... Und die Kat “Mountains in Graubünden“ könnte man ja wohl löschen, scheint mir überflüssig angesichts der neuen. Gruss und danke! --Parpan (talk) 14:57, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Hallo, Die "richtige" Positionierung erfolgte so:
[[Category:Mountains of Switzerland| Graubünden]]
(entscheidend war das Leerzeichen vor Graubünden) Die nun leere Kategorie habe ich noch mit {{Speedydelete| → [[Category:Mountains in the canton of Graubünden]]}} belegt. Gruss --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 17:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Danke - das mit dem Leerzeichen wusst' ich nicht, ist aber auch trickreich. Gruss aus den "Mountains of Switzerland| Graubünden", --Parpan (talk) 17:29, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Clocher

j'ai vue que tu a mis au reseau q'qs' images des clochers metallique des eglises du midi (ex.), et je-me demande esque-il-ya un terminus francais pour ce phenomen.

Bonjour, je n'ai pas compris ta question : terminus. Cordialement Vi..Cult... (talk) 13:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Voici une proposition de titre pour la catégorie des clochers en Anglais (car c'est la régle sur Commons) :

belltower (pluriel : belltowers) ou bell tower (signifie clocher) Encore mieux steeple 

  1. Clocher.
  2. Tour.


Clocher : Bâtiment de maçonnerie ou de charpente dans lequel sont suspendues les cloches et qui est ordinairement élevé au-dessus d’une église. 

   Petit clocher.
   Gros clocher.
   Clocher pointu.
   Clocher haut, élevé.
   La flèche d’un clocher.
   Monter au clocher.


Je propose ceci : Metal steeple in France. (c'est plus court que ce que tu as mis) Il y'aura sûrement des centaines de milliers de photo dans cette catégorie dans quelques années. Vi..Cult... (talk) 12:13, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Ce serait peut-être bien de mettre les photos dans cette catégorie que quand on voit très bien le clocher métallique. Sinon, cela fera doublon avec la catégorie des églises en France. Je te laisse t'occuper à la mise des photos dans la catégorie Metal Steeple in France. Amicalement Vi..Cult... (talk) 12:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Impeccable, sauf que je n'ai pas su faire ce que tu as fais ? Comment le faire, est-ce avec hotcat ? J'ai déjà utilisé hotcat, mais à chaque fois que je crée une catégorie, le lien de la catégorie reste en rouge et ne devient pas bleu. Vi..Cult... (talk) 15:52, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Category:Monument Historique

Bonjour,

J'ai répondu à ton message posté sur le Bistro. N'hésite pas à donner ton avis.

Je suis prêt à t'apporter de l'aide si nécessaire.

Grüße, Pymouss Tchatcher - 11:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Category:Monument Historique

Salut,

pourquoi tu as modifie les subcategories par numero de departement? Je trouve que c'est plus facile de trouver les departements par ordre alphabethique.

--Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 16:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Je ne fais que suivre l'idée de Coyau qui a commencé à tout reclasser. Vois plutôt avec lui !
Grüße, Pymouss Tchatcher - 16:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Category:Streets of Nice or Category:Streets in Nice

Well, I may have made a mistake but I believe that all the category about streets in France are named streets in rather than streets of. - Zil (d) 01:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

of course Streets in Nice is better than Streets of .... I have changed the template {{Category redirect|}} to {{move|Category:}} and restored the categorization so long there are all the streets in the category to be moved, because in your version you could not find any street of Nice. greets --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 11:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


Category:Railways

Category discussion notification Category:Railways has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

There are discussed the subcategories Category:Railways in France, Category:Railways in Nice. --ŠJů (talk) 23:52, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

General Motors and buildings

I just reverted some changes you made and also quickly tried to re-sort things with Category:Cadillac Place. It is the name of a building, it used to be called "General Motors Building", it is a group of joined buildings in Detroit. General Motors, the automobile company has many buildings and they are not all located in Detroit Michigan. That one building that used to have the same name as the category that should/could contain several buildings from many different cities makes it kind of confusing, perhaps.

Please do not be offended by my changing your changes to the categories. I actually looked things up (again) before doing this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadillac_Place

Let me know if you have any questions, complaints or want to bitch at me for what I did. -- carol (talk) 15:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Grüsse aus Rochester, Kent

I see your name so often on my watchlist, I thought it would only be polite to say hello. --ClemRutter (talk) 23:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Mountains of Tyrol / South Tyrol

Hello. Just curious, but why have you removed this category? I am asking because I myself am not sure whether to include cats such as Mountains of Tyrol and Mountains of South Tyrol in cases where also cats like Ötztal Alps exist. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 15:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi I have created a new category now Category:Schnalskamm which is categorized as Mountains of Tyrol and Mountains of South Tyrol. a couple of more mountains will wollow soon in this category. Btw: I am aware of the conflict of the categories Alps off... and Mountains in --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

regarding the Ötztal Alps I feel it is problematic to have the cats mentioned above (Category:Mountains of Tyrol and Category:Mountains of South Tyrol) at the level of the mountain range. So I removed them recently. A mountain is either in South Tyrol, or in Tyrol (which is the federal state of Austria), or at the border, which is modeled by adding both categories.
I also do not feel comfortable when the Mountains of ..-category is attached to a range, like e.g. on Category:Schnalskamm, even if all mountains for the moment share the same combination of Mountains of ..-categories, and will do so for the future. The reason is, that this inverses containment, the single mountain is part of the ridge, and not the other way round. So I would prefer to have the Mountains of ..-category at the level of individual mountains, or their individual categories. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Alpine huts vs. Mountain huts

Hallo Kurpfalzbilder.de, regarding your edit File:Raimeux02.JPG I think I have to disagree. Changing from Category:Mountain huts to Category:Alpine huts will make the File:Raimeux02.JPG a part of the Category:Alps, which it is definitely not. Same for File:Osser Willmann.JPG and possibly others. kind regard (and sharing your ceterum censeo) --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:59, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

o.k. thanks for the note, i'll create a new category "Mountain huts in Switzerland" for huts outside of the Alps, but File:Osser Willmann.JPG I have categorized as mountain hut, not as alpine hut, and there where mountain huts in Japan categorized as alpine huts i already have categorized as mountain huts --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 21:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for the File:Osser Willmann.JPG, you are right and I was wrong. knirsch --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

A new batch in category:Windmills in Germany

Hi, a new batch in category:Windmills in Germany is coming up. Enjoy. --Foroa (talk) 07:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Rocca Aldobrandesca di Sovana.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Rocca Aldobrandesca di Sovana.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Are you sure of the public domain status? Italian Wikipedia is not really good for licences Otourly (talk) 11:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


File tagging Image:SchlossGruensberggross.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:SchlossGruensberggross.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Jodo (talk) 21:12, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Category:Architecture by date and subcats

Please have a look at this. Thanks! TomAlt (talk) 11:34, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kurpfalzbilder.de/Archive_3&oldid=609312152"