User talk:Knochen

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Knochen!

Rd232 (talk) 14:10, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...[edit]

...for catching the spelling error on my Theater for a New City image. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:10, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me, too, for finding the spelling error in the file name of An der Kirche 3 PA010083.jpg! Greetings --Stefan Knauf (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi it's ok. Greetings --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  16:06, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks for totally useless renamings of names that are NOT misleading just because a single letter is not 100% correct. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 16:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you are an Admin. If you want you can move them back Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  18:34, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dateiverschieber?[edit]

Hallo Knochen, warum beantragst du eigentlich nicht die Dateiverschieberrechte? Deine Erfahrung in diesem Bereich sollte ausreichend sein, auch wenn die angegebenen Gründe nicht immer ganz passen, z. B. hier wäre 5 (Correct obvious errors in file names (e.g. wrong proper nouns or false historical dates)) deutlich passender als 3 (Correct misleading names into accurate ones). --Didym (talk) 21:28, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, habs versucht. Mal schauen was draus wird. Gruß --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  17:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Westerbauer[edit]

Hallo, kannst du vielleicht für File:Hagen-Westerbauer Enneper Straße 122 - geo.hlipp.de - 34798.jpg und File:Hagen-Westerbauer Enneper Straße 128 - geo.hlipp.de - 34802.jpg auch noch die großen Bildversionen "besorgen"?

Mit dem Kohlenbahntunnel guck ich noch, muss erst meine alten Unterlagen durchwühlen. Hatte deine Nachfrage erst kürzlich gesehen, weiß der Geier warum der Nachrichtenbalken damals ausblieb oder warum ich nichts mitbekommen hab. Holger1959 (talk) 16:07, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eine richtig große Auflösung gibts nicht. Tunnel warten wir ab, ok. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  18:17, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reinhart, Anton Ludwig 1672 Seega.jpg[edit]

Weshalb wurde die Datei verschoben? Wegen der Leerstelle nach dem Komma? Bzw. weshalb wurde die Leerstelle eingefügt? Jetzt sehe ich es, es war das fehlende d bei Ludwig. --GFHund (talk) 17:23, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Genga 39 cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hiperfelix (talk) 06:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hatte nur die ursprüngliche Datei verschoben. Hier sollte die Weiterleitung gelöscht werden um Platz für eine andere Datei zu machen. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  19:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Genga 38 cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hiperfelix (talk) 06:40, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hatte nur die ursprüngliche Datei verschoben. Hier sollte die Weiterleitung gelöscht werden um Platz für eine andere Datei zu machen. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  19:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank[edit]

Hallo Knochen, vielen Dank für den schnellen Service beim Umbenennen eines Bildes von mir, wo ich mich etwas vertippt hatte.
Schönes Wochenende noch sagt RaSlaMa.

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:13, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the trust. Best regards. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  18:17, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hrywnja[edit]

File:10-Hryvnia-1994-front.jpg - 2000 [1]. 1994 - [2]. Gipoza (talk) 08:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is your question. This is from 1994. The request to move came from User:Tigran Mitr am [3] --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  08:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[4] - 1994, Governor of the National Bank of Ukraine - Viktor Yushchenko (1993-1999). File:10-Hryvnia-1994-front.jpg - 2000, Governor of the National Bank of Ukraine - Volodymyr Stelmakh (2000-2002). Gipoza (talk) 09:04, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What is your question? What can i do?
translate to russia -
Русский: Каков ваш вопрос? Что можно сделать?
--Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  10:27, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to "File:10-Hryvnia-2000-front.jpg" Gipoza (talk) 10:37, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Была вообще 1995 --Tigran Mitr am (talk) 11:51, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Так 1995 вроде вообще не выпускалась? 1994 от 2000 можно отличить по должности и подписи: 1994 - "Голова Правлiння банку" Ющенко - в нижней части купюры. 2000 - "Голова" Стельмах - в верхней части купюры. Gipoza (talk) 12:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Я про предыдущее название файла --Tigran Mitr am (talk) 17:43, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File is renamed. Ready here? --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  15:49, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Hallo Knochen!

Bevor >sie Löschanträge stellen- ein Stern. Ja, beide Fotos sind von der Website des Künstlers. Beide Fotos (das Portrait ein Privatfoto) , das Andere ein Werk des Künstlers, das in seinem Privtbesitz ist und dort fotografiert wurde, sind mit seiner Erlaubnis hochgeladen worden. Also ein Stern! Erst mal überlegen und einen Grund finden zum löschen! Ciao! DJH zu Delete Jean-Claude Kunz.jpg und La_blbliotheque_oubliee.jpg. Desiree-jasmin heimeran (talk) 17:21, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, zunächst mal. Das Portraitfoto File:Jean-Claude Kunz.jpg wurde hier am 14.01.2014 hochgeladen, nicht von ihnen sondern von User:Dj heimeran. Auf der webseite ist es seit 05.09.2013 16:08:51 in exakt der Auflösung [5]. Also muss der User:Dj heimeran (ihre Sockenpuppe) dort eine Freigabe des Urhebers haben. Bei dem anderen Bild ist es das Gleiche. Wir können hier bereden was auch immer. Die Diskussion um die mögliche Löschung ist auf den jeweiligen Seiten der Löschdiskussionen zu führen. File:La Bibliotheque oubliee.jpg hab ich auch zur Löschung vorgeschlagen. Wenn es eine Erlaubnis des Künstlers/Urhebers gibt ist diese an permissions-de@wikimedia.org zu schicken. Textvorlagen gibt es hier - de:Wikipedia:Textvorlagen Gruß --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  18:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tom Finney - Preston North End.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tom Finney - Preston North End.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Egghead06 (talk) 19:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Steam engine lubrication-DASA.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:PODOLSK-3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Evil Russian (talk) 09:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:SMARs facultative.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SMARs facultative.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

TLSuda (talk) 15:57, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:SucharitSuda and King Vajiravudh (Rama VI).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 16:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:SucharitSuda and King Vajiravudh (Rama VI).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 14:33, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte eines Rename[edit]

Hallo Knochen, schau bitte genau hin, dennder neue Name ist nicht gleich dem alteh"	

{{Rename|File:Aachener Dom, Krönungsloge für die Ehrengäste im Hochmümster.jpg|File:Aachener Dom, Krönungsloge für die Ehrengäste im Hochmünster.jpg|typo|user=HOWI}}

Es sollte am Ende Hochmü'n'ster heißen, nicht mümster. Gruß, --HOWI (talk) 17:43, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, geschrieben hattest Du aber das die Datei vorher File:Aachener Dom, Krönungsloge für die Ehrengäste im Hochmümster.jpg und nachher auch genauso heißen sollte. [6] Werde sie umbenennen. Gruß --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  17:53, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Danke,--HOWI (talk) 18:03, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder Saxonia Karlsruhe[edit]

Lieber Knochen, ich verstehe Deinen Einwand nicht...

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Corps_Saxonia_Karlsruhe_Haus_Mathystrasse_Seite.PNG https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Corps_Saxonia_Karlsruhe_Haus_Mathystrasse_Front.PNG

Sind beide gemeinfrei, da Sie vor 1923 aufgenommen wurden... Was fehlt also?

Danke und Gruss VonDerSchuldenburg

Hallo, entschuldige bitte. Ich hatte nicht gesehen das die Bilder scheinbar von 1913 sind. Ich habe meine Bearbeitung zurück genommen. Könntest Du die Bilder noch Kategorisieren? Grüße --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  19:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:HMS Defender in build.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:HMS Defender in build.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:HMS Defender in build.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Diannaa (talk) 00:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:HMS Defender Sinking.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:HMS Defender Sinking.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:HMS Defender Sinking.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Diannaa (talk) 01:00, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:HMS Defender (1932).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:4D:2C17:B51E:C97:619E:5E57:DC68 14:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:HMS Defender Sinking.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:4D:2C17:B51E:C97:619E:5E57:DC68 14:09, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese Wikibooks broken links[edit]

Hi, Knochen. Do you know what happened here? There seem to be a problem with those edits.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 02:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Teles, File:Crystal 128 3d.png is replaced by File:Crystal Clear app 3d.png (duplicate image). My first edit was a mistake. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  19:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome. Thanks for fixing that!—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 04:07, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder von Geograph Deutschland[edit]

Hallo Knochen,

könntest Du mich beim Vorhaben unterstützen, die Bilder von Geograph Deutschland nach Commons zu übertragen? Upload mittels geograph2commons-Tool funktioniert (zumindest bei mir) nicht. Nachdem ich von Pontius nach Pilatus geschickt wurde, habe ich eine Anfrage bei Commons:Batch_uploading gestellt, die jetzt seit ziemlich genau einem Jahr unbeantwortet vor sich hin schlummert.

Grüße, --P170 (talk) 11:41, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo P170, Du bist sicher auf mich aufmerksam geworden weil ich einige Bilder von Geograph nach hier übertragen habe. Das ich alle Bilder von Geograph auch für die Wikipedia/Commons für geeignet halte kann ich nicht sagen. Zum Beispiel Kuhnesträßel bei Hatzenbühl wäre für uns auf den ersten Blick nicht sehr wertvoll. Dann sind die Bilder auf Geograph immer nur einer Kategorie zugeordnet, dieses z. B. der Kategorie Weg. Eine automatische Kategorisierung wäre nur mit sehr großem Fehlerpotential möglich. Es müssten dann also alle 50.000 Bilder von Hand Kategorisiert werden. Die Beschreibungen oder Dateinamen sind auch nicht immer so wie wir sie auf Commons verwenden, also im Einzelfall prüfen. Es müssten sich dann mehrere Leute drum kümmern. Ansonsten würden die Bilder nur einfach in einer Sammelkategorie sein wo sie niemand wirklich findet. Wenn da jemand ist der sich kümmert kann man sicher einen Botbetreiber finden der den Upload durchführt. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  18:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Knochen, danke für die Antwort! Mir geht es vor allem um die zahlreichen Bilder, die sofort in einen Wikipedia-Artikel eingebunden werden könnten. Hier vor allem solche für Listen von Kulturdenkmälern von Orten oder auch Bilder von Orten/Ortsteilen, denen bei Wikipedia/Commons noch gänzlich ein Bild fehlt. Dieser Zugewinn wiegt doch deutlich beträchtlicher als der Nachteil durch vermeintlich nicht wertvolle Bilder, wobei die Vorgaben für ein Bild bei Geograph nach meiner Ansicht ganz gut zu den Commons passen; so sind doch nahezu alle Bilder immer noch relevant genug für den Verbleib in den jeweiligen Orts-Kategorien. Da die Bilder bei Geograph, wie du weißt, alle einen geographischen Bezug haben müssen, würde ich es für sinnvoll erachten, die Bilder automatisch nach den hinterlegten Landkreisen (auf Ortsebene wird wohl leider anscheinend die Entfernung zum nächsten Ort statt der Lage in einer bestimmten Gemarkung berücksichtigt) zu kategorisieren. Grüße --P170 (talk) 19:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Das ist sicher richtig. Vor diesem Hintergrund habe ich ja auch etliche Bilder nach hier übertragen. Die Kategorisierung in eine Ortskategorie klappt schon nicht. Da wäre mal z. B. Drethem - Kirche, gehört um Artikel de:Drethem, eine Category:Drethem gibt es aber nicht. Von solchen Kategorien wie Neustadt (ca. 1.000 Kategorien) mal ganz zu schweigen. Es bleibt bei der Handarbeit von 50.000 Bildern. Die Bilder werden einfach nicht gefunden weil sie nicht automatisch der richtigen Kategorie zugeordnet werden können. Wie kann das gelöst werden? --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  20:04, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ich bezog mich nicht auf den Titel des Bildes, sondern auf die automatische Zuordnung zu einem Ort (hier: "6 km entfernt von Neu Darchau, Kreis Lüchow-Dannenberg, Niedersachsen"). --P170 (talk) 20:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Schon klar. Wie setzen wir das hier um? Erstellen wir dann eine Category:6 km entfernt von Neu Darchau, Kreis Lüchow-Dannenberg, Niedersachsen und für das benachbarte Bild eine Category:5 km entfernt von Neu Darchau, Kreis Lüchow-Dannenberg, Niedersachsen oder all diese Bilder nach Category:Neu Darchau. Woher weiß der Bot das es richtig ist? --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  19:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Löschung von Bildern[edit]

Hallo Knochen, ich bin noch recht neu bei Wikipedia... Könntest du mir vielleicht erklären, warum genau du jetzt meine Bilder gelöscht hast? Vielen Dank schon mal, --Europaregion (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, nun Du hattest bei den Bildern hier genau so wie bei den Bildern auf der de.wikipedia.org angegeben das die Bilder dein Eigenes Werk sind. Dem ist aber nicht so gewesen. Die gelöschten Bilder stammten alle von der Seite Dunaj - vltava, wie z. B. dieses Bild. Ein Bild wird erst dann zum eigenen Werk wenn Du es selbst photographierst oder das Logo selbst entworfen und digital hergestellt hast. Für alle Bilder die irgendwo aus dem Internet kopiert werden benötigst Du die Erlaubnis und schriftliche Freigabe von dem Rechteinhaber (in der Regel ist das der Photograph oder Ersteller der Grafik).--Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  18:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, aber die Bilder stammen ja von der Europaregion Donau-Moldau. Wir haben sowohl die Bilder erstellt, als auch die Homepage Dunaj - vltava und auch den Wikipediabeitrag zur Europaregion. --Europaregion (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Was ich sehen kann ist, Du bist als de:Benutzer:Europaregion verifiziert mit einer Email-Adresse von ooe.gv.at. Das hat mit den Bildern die hier gelöscht wurden mal nix zu tun. Zum andern hat die Rechte an dem Bild der Photograph nicht der Inhaber der website, der hat vielleicht ein Nutzungsrecht. Wenn die Bilder von Dir gemacht wurden schick eine Email an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org und bitte um Wiederherstellung bei dem löschenden Admin (einfach den Link einer gelöschten Datei anklicken dann steht dort wer gelöscht hat, ich kann nicht löschen) oder auf Commons:Undeletion_requests/de anfragen. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  17:34, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Vol 9525 Germanwings, photo du CVR, acheminé dans les locaux du BEA..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AFBorchert (talk) 18:53, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

datei verschoben[edit]

Hallo knochen, kannst du mir bitte erklären, warum du die datei mit der begründung, dass rechtschreibfehler vorliegen verschoben hast. sfb ist die abkürzung für senftenberg und groß-kleinschreibung im dateinamen rechtfertigt kein sinnloses verschieben von dateien. gruß --Z thomas 19:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, kann ich. Das Bild hieß vorher File:Bergbaushaus sfb seite.JPG, das sfb mit zu ändern war nur Beiwerk. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  17:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
DAS ist eine sehr gute erklärung... :-) --Z thomas 12:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

file move[edit]

Danke knochen, dass du La Gomera-mountains.jpg verschoben hast. Hast du meine Anmerkung übersehen dass die Kategorie ausser dieser noch 23 weitere DSCF... Dateien enthält? Also, ich bin vor manueller Verschiebung zurückgeschreckt; die file descriptions lassen sich gut mit VFC verbessern. Gruss sarang사랑 15:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ja hatte ich gesehen. Es gibt tausende Bilder die ohne Beschreibung sind und häufig nicht oder nicht richtig kategorisiert sind. Ja eigentlich könnten die gelöscht werden. Nur müsste man sich die alle auch ansehen ob da vielleicht doch was brauchbares steht. Da wirds wahrscheinlich böses Blut geben, welcher Admin wird das machen? Was ist VFC? --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  18:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Was diese von MaybeMaybeMaybe hochgeladenen flickr-Bilder betrifft, sind die meisten recht gute Landschaftssichten von La Gomera,sie zeigen was an der Insel typisch ist. Hier ist das Umbenennen recht einfach, auch die Ersetzung der Beschreibung. Der user hat viele hundert flickr-Bilder als "DSC..." transferiert bei denen solche Reparaturen weitaus schwieriger sind.
Von VFC werden komplexe Masseneditierungen unterstützt, es ist ein sehr hilfreiches tool. sarang사랑 06:30, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, zunächst versteh ich nicht warum Du die Datei nicht selbst verschoben hast. Als Dateiverschieber bist Du ja tätig. Einfach nur den Namen von DSCFxxx.jpg auf La Gomera xxx.jpg zu ändern macht es aber nicht besser. Entweder gibt es eine Beschreibung die aussagekräftig ist und/oder der Dateiname ist es. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  10:00, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cathedral is correct in English, but the cathedral name was otherwise in Spanish. An oversight on my part regarding "Cathedral". Please take another l00k. --Agamemnus (talk) 09:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Agamemnus: All words are English except one? --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  20:33, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Knochen: No. If it was in English, it would be "the Cathedral of Saint Salvador" or "Saint Salvador Cathedral". In Spanish, it would be "Catedral de San Salvador". --Agamemnus (talk) 22:40, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Agamemnus:then make a new request to rename --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  06:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Knochen:Allow me to clarify... I think that mixing English and Spanish (or another language) is okay if the whole title of the church is used with one language, but the text of the rest of the sentence with another, because the name of the object itself in the original language may convey a certain ...je ne sais quoi... lost in another language. That's why I originally wanted to say "Statue of Manuel María González With a Barrel of Tio Pepe, By Catedral de San Salvador, in Jerez de la Frontera, Spain". --Agamemnus (talk) 03:33, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Marjory Stoneman Douglas Cottage.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Marjory Stoneman Douglas Cottage.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Marjory Stoneman Douglas Cottage.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

– czar 07:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The pic is from 1926, see her and here --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  04:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dziewkowice herb[edit]

Hallo :)

Warum wird mein Foto stets mit einem Beseitigungsanspruch markiert?

Dieses Foto stammt aus der privaten Fotosammlung, die mein Opa als der Bürgermeister des Dorges Dziewkowice besessen hat.

Jetzt hat unsere Familie diese Fotos in Besitz. Dieses Foto wurde von der Wilkommenstafel unseres Dorfes entnommen, die in unserem Dorf vor Jahren aufgestellt wurde und ist selbstverständlich glaubhaft. Diese Tafel beinhaltet die deutsch-polnischen Begrüßungen und Wappen unseres Dorfes. Das Wappen wollte ich auf wikipedia platzieren.

Bitte dieses Foto auf wikipedia speichern !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiocha1921 (talk • contribs) 10:48, 1. Aug. 2015‎ (UTC)

Hallo Wiocha1921, es nutzt nicht wenn Du hier etwas dazu schreibst. Du musst es auf der Seite der Löschdiskussion darstellen → Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dziewkowice herb 2.jpg. Das war bei der ersten Löschung auch so. Es ist vollkommen uninteressant ob ich das hier lese, ich entscheide nicht über eine Löschung. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  10:51, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Dass du das Wappen von einer Tafel abfotografiert hast, macht das Wappen nicht zu deinem "eigenen Werk". Von daher ist das eine falsche Beschriftung der Datei und wird zu Recht gelöscht. --Jonny84 (talk) 18:02, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your note[edit]

You added a note to this image: File:John Stutz CryingPlanets2015.jpg (and one other) indicating that the EXIF listed ANTLITZ.COM As the copyright holder.

Please note this site where it indicates that company is owned by D-J Stieger, who has sent in a permission statement to OTRS--Sphilbrick (talk) 13:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick: , yes he sent it - today. It's ok done --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  20:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, volle Auflösung beim 10. Bild von oben, hier. Gruß

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 10:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haus Dahlhausen - Bochum (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:20, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uss Miantonomoh 1863.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Parsecboy (talk) 11:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uss Dictator 1863.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Parsecboy (talk) 11:48, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]