User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2023/Q4
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cannon Beach October 2019 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cannon Beach October 2019 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecola Point October 2019 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecola Point October 2019 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boulder Beach Acadia October 2021 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecola Point October 2019 panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kalaloch Beach Olympic June 2018 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kalaloch Beach Olympic June 2018 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kalaloch Beach Olympic June 2018 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boulder Beach Acadia October 2021 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kalaloch Beach Olympic June 2018 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kalaloch Beach Olympic June 2018 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kalaloch Beach Olympic June 2018 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kalaloch Beach Olympic June 2018 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kalaloch Beach Olympic June 2018 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boulder Beach Acadia October 2021 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hamilton Park Jersey City November 2021 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hamilton Park Jersey City November 2021 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hamilton Park Jersey City November 2021 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! William L Dickinson High School Jersey City November 2021 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! William L Dickinson High School Jersey City November 2021 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! William L Dickinson High School Jersey City November 2021 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Reverted your removal of a permissions tag[edit]
I have reverted your removal of a permissions tag on an image of Jess Wade. I do not remotely believe that your reasoning that the WMF can be inherently trusted when it comes to statements of copyright releases is actually policy here, or indeed this is how the law operates. I could be wrong, but other other your asserting it and giving random examples where this has apparently been allowed, have you any proof in policy? Bearing in mind this is not a case of the WMF releasing an image it has the rights to, it is a case of the WMF claiming without proof that a third party (Jess Wade) had the rights to the image. I think it quite obvious (as I have said elsewhere) that because of how common it is for photography subjects to wrongly assume that merely being in a photograph means they have the rights to it, this is absolutely a situation where the SOP that Turelio refers to, providing proof of permission to Commons, would have to be followed. Wade needs to email explicit proof to Commons that she was legally entitled to release that photo on that license. If not, the Commons precautionary principle applies. No? Click To Go (talk) 10:04, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Harsimus Cove Jersey City November 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! South Beach Olympic June 2018 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kalaloch Beach Olympic June 2018 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 015 edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hamilton Park Jersey City November 2021 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! NJ-139 and I-78 Jersey City November 2021 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! South Beach Olympic June 2018 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hamilton Park Jersey City November 2021 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hamilton Park Jersey City November 2021 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hamilton Park Jersey City November 2021 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! NJ-139 and I-78 Jersey City November 2021 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! NJ-139 and I-78 Jersey City November 2021 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! City Hall Jersey City November 2021 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kalaloch Beach Olympic June 2018 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hamilton Park Jersey City November 2021 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kalaloch Beach Olympic June 2018 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Las Vegas Strip from Resorts World February 2023 HDR 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Las Vegas Strip from Resorts World February 2023 HDR 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kalaloch Beach Olympic June 2018 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! South Beach Olympic June 2018 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in/contribute to a photo contest[edit]
English[edit]
Dear King of Hearts,
We’re excited to share with you our first-ever art and photo contest for this year’s #VisibleWikiWomen, on Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports!
We’re inviting submissions of photos, illustrations, and other forms of art depicting womxn and non-binary people in sports — as athletes, fans, cheerleaders, referees, journalists, and much more. Our #VisibleWikiWomxn contest celebrates the bodies of womxn in sports by centering their voices, images, stories, and experiences in all their diversity, plurality, and glory.
You can find all the information on our landing page: Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports
Spanish[edit]
Hola King of Hearts,
Queremos invitarte a participar de nuestro primer concurso de arte y fotografía "Cuerpos plurales en el deporte" en el marco de la campaña #VisibleWikiWomen de este año.
Estamos convocando a presentar fotos, ilustraciones y otras formas de arte que representen a mujeres y personas no binarias en el deporte - atletas, personas aficionadas, animadoras, árbitras, periodistas y personas ligadas al deporte en todos los aspectos. Nuestro concurso #VisibleWikiWomxn celebra los cuerpos de las mujeres en el deporte centrándose en sus voces, imágenes, historias y experiencias en toda su diversidad, pluralidad y gloria.
Puedes encontrar toda la información en la página del concurso.
Portuguese[edit]
Olá King of Hearts,
Ficamos felizes em convidar você a participar de nossa primeira Wiki-competição de arte e fotografia, como parte da campanha #VisibleWikiWomen deste ano, sobre "Corpos plurais no esporte"!
Estamos recebendo fotos, ilustrações, e outras formas de arte que retratem mulheres e pessoas não-binárias nos esportes — como atletas, torcedoras, juízas, jornalistas, e muito mais. Nossa competição #VisibleWikiWomxn celebra os corpors de mulheres e pessoas não-binárias e coloca ao centro suas vozes, imagens, histórias, e experiências em toda sua pluralidade e glória.
Você pode encontrar todas as informações necessárias em nossa página: Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports.
Sunshine Fionah Komusana (talk) 14:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States 2023[edit]
Hello! In 2021, you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States. Thanks to people like you, it was a great success with over 500 people contributing over 5,500 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage. You can see the top-ten winners of the US competition here.
While the United States did not participate in Wiki Loves Monuments in 2022, I'm pleased to say that we're back for 2023 through the month of October! I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our 2023 event page for more information.
Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2021, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you have any questions, please leave them on the event talk page.
Thanks, ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! William L Dickinson High School Jersey City November 2021 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Louvre Cour Carrée June 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! City Hall Jersey City November 2021 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
verified account[edit]
Hi King of Hearts, I stumbled about this edit . I do not understand, why you verified this account. The ticket is valid for one single image only, which was not taken by the uploader: File:British model Anna Shapiro with a fake gun by Adam Nicholas Photography.jpg. Maybe I missed something? Raymond (talk) 08:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- The file description clearly refers to "my gun themed photoshoot" and was uploaded as "own work". Therefore it is reasonable to conclude that The Universe of Nebadon = "Adam Nicholas Photography", especially given that they have not uploaded photos claimed to be taken by anyone other than "Adam Nicholas Photography" and repeated refer to "my photoshoot" in their descriptions. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your quick answer, King of Hearts, and the explanation. Probably you are right but I am not fully convinced because the ticket is not fully clearly. I would like to ask Adam Nicholas via this ticket. Do you have any objections? Raymond (talk) 10:56, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong with that, but keep in mind that we're talking to a random email address which is unverified, and in fact unverifiable, since "Adam Nicholas Photography" has no online presence that I could find. So a statement made by this email address is not any stronger than a statement made by a random Commons account. The standard we should be applying is: If they had instead used "Adam Nicholas Photography" as their Commons username, and everything else about their activity is unchanged, would we be asking for VRT? My answer is no. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts Yes, you are right, I have not checked the email address. I will not do any actions for now. Raymond (talk) 11:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong with that, but keep in mind that we're talking to a random email address which is unverified, and in fact unverifiable, since "Adam Nicholas Photography" has no online presence that I could find. So a statement made by this email address is not any stronger than a statement made by a random Commons account. The standard we should be applying is: If they had instead used "Adam Nicholas Photography" as their Commons username, and everything else about their activity is unchanged, would we be asking for VRT? My answer is no. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your quick answer, King of Hearts, and the explanation. Probably you are right but I am not fully convinced because the ticket is not fully clearly. I would like to ask Adam Nicholas via this ticket. Do you have any objections? Raymond (talk) 10:56, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Van Vorst Park Jersey City November 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! City Hall Jersey City November 2021 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church Square Park Hoboken November 2021 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken City Hall November 2021 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church Square Park Hoboken November 2021 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken November 2021 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church Square Park Hoboken November 2021 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Sorry[edit]
… for the ongoing discussion in your nomination, King of Hearts! I originally wanted to answer in a separate discussion, but then the discussion would have been divided again, and some users would have missed the continuation (this has happened with the previous comments on the AI reviews). I am really sorry that it spoils the look of your nomination and for any inconvenience this may cause. Let me take the opportunity to congratulate you on this photo: The combination of the blue hour with the reflection of the sunset sky in the glass of the skyscrapers is unique and wonderful! Best, --Aristeas (talk) 15:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- No worries - the discussion has been rather amusing to follow.
-- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken City Hall November 2021 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken November 2021 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken November 2021 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken November 2021 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church Square Park Hoboken November 2021 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church Square Park Hoboken November 2021 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Edwin A Stevens Hall Hoboken November 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! El Dorado Apartments Hoboken November 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken Public Library November 2021 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Midtown Manhattan from Weehawken September 2021 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Midtown Manhattan from Weehawken September 2021 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken November 2021 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken City Hall November 2021 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken November 2021 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken November 2021 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 77 Park Avenue Hoboken November 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken November 2021 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken City Hall November 2021 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Joshbanana uploads[edit]
Hi King of Hearts. Would you mind taking a look at File:Krol in Japan.jpg? The reason I'm asking is that the uploader is claiming that it's their "own work", but they are also claiming that they're 15 years old on their English Wikipedia user talk page and that the photo was taken in Japan. Of course, all of those things are possible, but the uploader also stated on their user talk page that they had contacted the management of the photo's subject to ask for a photo to use on Wikipedia. In addition, there's also this video of the same person which looks like a 15-year-old that the uploader is also claiming as "own work" which makes me wonder whether the uploader is also the subject of the photo. This is odd because en:Draft:Beji Krol is supposed to be a 22-year-old Brazilian social media personality. Finally, File:D0CBF360-5405-4792-BCDF-3FA379C2FAF.jpg and File:Lurasidone 2.png were uploaded by the same uploader, but are attributed to someone else without any source provided to verify they've been released as claimed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken November 2021 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken November 2021 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken November 2021 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken Public Library November 2021 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Marshfield Pond October 2021 003.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Marshfield Pond October 2021 003.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoboken November 2021 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 HDR 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 HDR 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 HDR 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of Grace Hoboken November 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aztec Ruins October 2022 HDR 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023 - Nomination Phase[edit]
Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
the 2023 board election of our group is run at
Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023.
The next steps in the timeline for the 2023 election are
- October 20 – November 16: Nomination phase for candidacies
- November 17 – December 10: Elections
- December 16: Results announced
If you are interested in being a member of the board, please nominate yourself on the Election Page.
We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.
All the best
--Ailura (talk) for the CPUG board
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Cannon Beach October 2019 panorama 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cannon Beach October 2019 panorama 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 |
⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐
The file File:Cape May Lighthouse September 2020 002.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
|
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Ecola Point October 2019 panorama 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ecola Point October 2019 panorama 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Red Mill Clinton October 2021 003.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red Mill Clinton October 2021 003.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Buteo jamaicensis New York September 2019 002.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buteo jamaicensis New York September 2019 002.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2016 002.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2016 002.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 22:17, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Martin Langer[edit]
Thank you for correcting my mistake in not noticing Martin Langer and Nitram Regnal are the same. I am still concerned with the self attribution of a portrait where Langer is the sitter, File:Martin Langer während der Arbeit am Buchprojekt 'Das Land des Lächelns', 1983.jpg, which raises the same concern as File:Martin Langer, Fotograf.jpg. I leave it up to you to appreciate if a permission should also be asked there, taking into account Langer's death last year. Cheers, — Racconish 💬 09:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Given that this is a photographer we are talking about, I think it is fine to assume that pictures of him tagged as "own work" are in fact self-taken, since he does take care to provide proper attribution when he is not the photographer. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Not consistant with this, isn't it ? — Racconish 💬 17:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- The point is that {{No permission}} is used in two cases: 1) when an uploader claims that someone else created a work but fails to provide evidence of permission; 2) when an uploader claims that something is own work but we simply don't believe them. On File:Martin Langer, Fotograf.jpg, the uploader has clearly indicated Udo Thomas as the author, so this falls into case 1. We don't have any evidence that the uploader's provided authorship information is inaccurate, so I see no reason to make any taggings under case 2. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I find it slightly dubious it is self portrait, but then there is no reason to question his claim, he cannot defend himself and you believe it is true. So let it be. Have a nice day, — Racconish 💬 18:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- The point is that {{No permission}} is used in two cases: 1) when an uploader claims that someone else created a work but fails to provide evidence of permission; 2) when an uploader claims that something is own work but we simply don't believe them. On File:Martin Langer, Fotograf.jpg, the uploader has clearly indicated Udo Thomas as the author, so this falls into case 1. We don't have any evidence that the uploader's provided authorship information is inaccurate, so I see no reason to make any taggings under case 2. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Not consistant with this, isn't it ? — Racconish 💬 17:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 024.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mount Washington Cog Railway October 2021 024.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Typeface samples licensing[edit]
I have to agree with you that Chewzy's unilateral licensing changes should be reverted, but I think I need help since at least 400 files were affected. For your information, the revert comment I used is: "Please discuss first before making large-scale licensing changes to font samples." --Minoa (talk) 13:33, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Flickypedia soft launch and a huge thank you[edit]
Dear fellow Commons photographer,
I hope this message finds you well. As you might already know, the Flickr Foundation has been busy creating a new Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) this year. After a successful demo at the GLAM Wiki Conference in Montevideo, the Flickr Foundation team is now inviting all members of the Commons Photographers User Group to be the first to review their alpha, reporting any technical issues or other feedback via the Flickypedia project talk page.
At the same time, this message is an opportunity for me to thank you for your trust and support over the past couple of years. Since 2017, we've grown into being one of the largest user groups in the Wikimedia universe. I've tremendously enjoyed interacting with all of our members when it came to joint photowalks at Wikimanias, virtual Zoom meetings where we covered a wide variety of photography topics, as well as our annual “Most memorable shot of the year”, among many other events. As I'm not running for an official position in our current board election, this will be my last message on behalf of the user group to you. Thanks for all the happy moments we shared together over the years! I hope you'll continue creating free images for the millions of people we serve through Wikipedia and Commons.
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
King of Hearts, I'm puzzled by this close, for a couple of reasons. First, because the Museum of Modern Art, which owns this work of art, clearly states on this page that the copyright is held by the estate of the artist, Philippe Halsman. Assuming this is true--is there a reason not to?--that would seem to preclude it being used on any Wikipedia except as a non-free image with the usual restrictions of such.
Second, the arguments seemed to be that it was important to keep as an image, with the suggestion that it be moved from Commons to the en Wikipedia so it could continue to be used in articles there (presumably under non-free image rules). (One of the commenters didn't seem to care where it was, which seems odd since free use is required for Commons inclusion.)
Thank you for letting me know of any Commons issues I've missed here. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:14, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- The point is that the image has previously been kept at DR after extensive discussion with a strong consensus. It cannot be properly renominated for deletion unless the original reason for keeping is addressed. It seems that none of the participants at the present DR were aware of the original DR. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:25, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Participation in North American Hub research[edit]
Hello, King of Hearts! I'm writing on behalf of the North American hub research committee to see if you would be interested in participating in a one hour focus group. During the session, we will discuss how a potential hub could support Commons contributors by providing services such as professional development and grant support. Our research phase is ending very soon (12/31). I apologize for the short notice. If there's any chance you can join us for a meeting on 12/20 @ 1pm ET, please respond to Ariel.Cetrone at wikidc.org. Thanks for considering -Ariel Cetrone (WMDC) (talk) 18:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy holidays![edit]
|
Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and successful New Year 2024! |
|
Best wishes – and thank you for your great photos![edit]
.jpg)
|
✴ Happy Holidays, King of Hearts ✴
Merry Christmas and a happy new year! |
|
*ೃ༄ Feliz Navidad, King_of_Hearts *ೃ༄
Merry Christmas and a joyous new year filled with peace, love, and happiness! Wilfredor |
Wilfredor (talk) 19:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy holidays and best wishes![edit]
|
Happy holidays!
Merry christmas! Best wishes for 2024! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
Happy holidays![edit]
  |
* Happy Holidays! * | |
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Christmas and New Year 2024[edit]
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025! |
|
Hello King of Hearts/Archive/2023, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |