User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2022/Q4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Kuwait Finance House Logo.svg[edit]

Hi King of Hearts. Do you think File:Kuwait Finance House Logo.svg this is {{PD-logo}}? It seems borderline at best per COM:TOO United States, but I've got no idea about the TOO for COM:Kuwait. Anyway, the reason I'm asking you about this is that I noticed the uploader pinging you and Jeff G. on their user talk page; so, I thought that one of you might've been previously tried to help the uploader out without something else. Instead of posting the same message on Jeff G.'s user talk, I just pinged him in this one to avoid a potential fragmenting of the discussion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:29, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: I helped the uploader Ziad Mohamed in two sections, archived at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2022/09#bank logo and User talk:Jeff G./Archives/2022/September#About my discussion with you. They have three blocks for copyvio uploading. I hope Aymatth2 may have some input re TOO for Kuwait.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 09:53, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would say this image fails the US threshold of originality test. The logo is quite complex, far more than a simple combination of letters and shapes. COM:NOP Kuwait#6 would also be relevant: it is innovative in the way the collection of text and symbols is displayed. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:54, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Jeff G. and Aymatth2 for taking a look at this. The logo is now being discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kuwait Finance House Logo.svg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Online workshop this weekend[edit]

Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,

This coming Saturday, October 8, we'll host an online post processing workshop. On behalf of our events coordinator Shreya I invite you to sign up for the event using this Google form.

I hope you're well. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Translation notification: Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2022[edit]

Hello King of Hearts,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to Spanish and Chinese on Wikimedia Commons. The page Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2022 is available for translation. You can translate it here:

The priority of this page is medium.


Winners just announced

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 09:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Translation notification: Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2022[edit]

Hello King of Hearts,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to Spanish and Chinese on Wikimedia Commons. The page Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2022 is available for translation. You can translate it here:

The priority of this page is medium.


Winners just announced

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 14:51, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --AnonymousGuyFawkes 10:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midtown Manhattan from Weehawken September 2021 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midtown Manhattan from Weehawken September 2021 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midtown Manhattan from Weehawken September 2021 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 13:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quinault Rain Forest June 2018 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quinault Rain Forest June 2018 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quinault Rain Forest June 2018 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 17:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quinault Rain Forest June 2018 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 17:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quinault Rain Forest June 2018 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 17:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midtown Manhattan from Weehawken September 2021 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port Imperial Weehawken September 2021 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle from Space Needle June 2018 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lincoln Park Jersey City September 2021 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:52, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lincoln Park Jersey City September 2021 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crater Lake October 2019 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I suggest that the file name be changed to the peak name. --Tagooty 03:07, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crater Lake October 2019 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh Rain Forest Olympic June 2018 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh Rain Forest Olympic June 2018 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh Rain Forest Olympic June 2018 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh Rain Forest Olympic June 2018 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh Rain Forest Olympic June 2018 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quinault Rain Forest June 2018 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quinault Rain Forest June 2018 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 03:42, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper West Side from Weehawken September 2021 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crater Lake October 2019 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:34, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crater Lake October 2019 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 07:50, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lincoln Park Jersey City September 2021 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:38, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lincoln Park Jersey City September 2021 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:27, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lincoln Park Jersey City September 2021 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lincoln Park Jersey City September 2021 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quinault Rain Forest June 2018 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh Rain Forest Olympic June 2018 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh Rain Forest Olympic June 2018 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crater Lake October 2019 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crater Lake October 2019 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lincoln Park Jersey City September 2021 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:15, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lincoln Park Jersey City September 2021 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quinault Rain Forest June 2018 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Picture deleted and recovered[edit]

Hi, last July you recovered a picture I had uploaded since it had suffered a speedy deletion. In the comment, you requested that I (the photographer) upload the original picture with the EXIF metadata. Since it was an old pic it took me a while but I eventually found it. In the meanwhile, the uploaded picture was deleted by @Didym. The original pic is different since the uploaded one was a crop from the original. I uploaded the original one here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Samer_Hassan_in_the_Harvard_campus.jpg Is that appropriate and correct? Thank you. Nizarhsn (talk) 13:48, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is sufficient. Restored. -- King of ♥ 18:20, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quinault Rain Forest June 2018 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 17:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh Rain Forest Olympic June 2018 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh Rain Forest Olympic June 2018 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 01:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lincoln Park Jersey City September 2021 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lincoln Park Jersey City September 2021 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:33, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quinault Rain Forest June 2018 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:32, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh Rain Forest Olympic June 2018 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoh Rain Forest Olympic June 2018 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:33, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lincoln Park Jersey City September 2021 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 04:10, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lincoln Park Jersey City September 2021 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Bixby Creek Bridge May 2011 panorama.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...[edit]

...for Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Theresa_ltg - I just didn't know how to handle this properly. In some aspects commons.wikimedia.org appears to be even more bureaucratic + complicated than deWP :-). --RoBri (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RoBri: Yeah, and sometimes there's multiple ways to handle things, so it's not written down what the best way is. My rule of thumb is that a batch DR should be used when there are many similar images uploaded by the same uploader which appear to be from the same source. This has a few advantages: 1) it keeps the discussion together for everyone's convenience; 2) there is a good chance they are an official representative, they just need to prove it, so I would hesitate to speedy delete anything without giving them that opportunity. -- King of ♥ 19:51, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. The user had been given hints and advice in deWP about licences and proving her identity. I personally expect users that claim to be professional to actually act professionally. Also - and this maybe crucial - I'm rather impatient. :-) So thanks again + cheers, --RoBri (talk) 20:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Noronha images[edit]

Hello thanks for your support back there. I think there are still a few more files that haven't been restored for example here's a recent one that had been deleted File:Teotonio Pereira, ex-MLA, Goa's first assembly.jpg. I'll try to find if there are more, also it's great to see how this turned out to be for us. It's actually a big win for 70K files being donated to commons. Cheers! ✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 19:36, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. -- King of ♥ 19:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again King of Hearts, could you restore File:Reita Faria in Africa.jpg and it's cropped file version? It appears to have been deleted despite the clarification from the author. ✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 06:08, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. -- King of ♥ 06:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question from the CPUG Board[edit]

Dear user group member,

I'm writing you to today on behalf of the board of the Commons Photographers User Group. The past year has been a busy one for us. In 2022, we've had more activities than ever before in the history of our group and you'll find an overview on our group's page.

With that being said, 2022 was also a year of learning for the current board members. Most of us hadn't been involved in running the Photographers User Group and we spent quite some time on getting used to our new roles. We all feel it was a steep learning curve.

That's why, at our last board meeting, we decided to ask our members whether they'd be ok with us serving for another year. Extending our board duties to the end of 2023 would allow us to continue the work we've started this year, and to benefit from the knowledge we've built over the past twelve months.

However, in the end, it's up to you and the other members of our group to decide whether such an extension of our board term should be granted. I invite you to voice your opinion on this page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2022

We'll gather feedback until December 27, and we'll keep you in the loop about the outcomes of this process.

Thanks so much for your ongoing support of our group. I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best.

--Ailura (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge – Second Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Midtown Manhattan from Weehawken September 2021 HDR.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Skyscrapers, in October 2022. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:07, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2022/2023![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2022/2023, King of Hearts/Archive/2022! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 22 December 2022 (UTC)   [reply]

Happy Holidays 2022/2023![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2022/2023, King of Hearts/Archive/2022! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

Happy Holidays and best wishes for 2023. Pierre André (talk) 11:33, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays![edit]

Happy holidays, King of Hearts!

Hello King of Hearts, have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! It has been a pleasure to have you as a fellow Wikimedian this year. Wherever you are, enjoy the festive season and stay warm (if you're north of the Tropic of Cancer)! Your help in maintaining, improving and expanding Wikimedia Commons will always be appreciated.

Greetings from Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
--SHB2000 on 12:23, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ndifreke.jpg:[edit]

I'm unsure why you removed the No permission template that you initially added to the photo. It's pretty obvious it was taken from somewhere else Trade (talk) 16:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Trade: Once an image is kept at DR, tagging it as a copyvio or "no permission" can be seen as subverting the consensus-driven process, which previously determined that the image should be kept. While the discussion focused more on the COM:SCOPE aspects of the image, the closing admin is expected to consider all aspects of the image (including copyright), and presumably they did not find an issue with it. Therefore, any further attempts to delete the image must go through DR. When I initially tagged the photo, I did not notice that it had survived DR. -- King of ♥ 18:38, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, i've nominated both of them to deletion. Would appreciate if you would come with your input Trade (talk) 23:33, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

my speedydeletions[edit]

hello sir, i need help. you are an admin. so, you can help me.

i wanna see how many speedydeletions i have. BUT, i cannot see them because the files are already deleted with my edits. i cannot see them.

the reason why i wanna know them, because im gonna add these to my userpage.

also if you gonna inform me how to i see speedydeletions marked by me, im very thankful against you.

also if you have to copy and paste about this work, you can do this in there: User:Modern primat/denemeMEME ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 19:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Modern primat: This page has your edit count statistics, including deleted edits. It's not exactly the same as the number of successful speedy taggings, since there could be other reasons for having deleted edits such as successful DRs or your own contributions being deleted, but at least it gives you some idea. -- King of ♥ 21:08, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
you just have to copy paste the information placed in Special:DeletedContributions/Modern primat to User:Modern primat/denemeMEME. i dont know it is forbidden to do this.. but thank you for responding! (and if you can, please copypaste it) ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 21:24, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But that would only be a static dump, and would quickly fall out of date. Is there any particular reason why you need a snapshot of your speedy deletions right now? If you're going to ask for this list regularly going forward, I don't think it's a great use of admins' time. -- King of ♥ 22:04, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
im investigating this because of that: https://imgur.com/UdbUKgq ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 23:24, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see, you want to keep a tally of your deletion nominations on your user page. Unfortunately, I don't think it's a productive use of your time or anyone else's time to maintain such a list. Of course, I have no right to tell you how you should spend your time, so if you really want to keep track of everything going forward you can add them to the list immediately upon tagging them for deletion. -- King of ♥ 23:30, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
thanks ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 23:53, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]