User talk:Kai3952/Archive 7

Commons管理員無視意見 強行刪除台北101內部照片

早前有用戶在Commons要求刪除台北101內部照片。本人根據台灣智慧財產局著作權主題網列出的問題，該處已經寫明“拍攝"室內"裝潢的行為是將實施結果的實體物為拍攝，並不涉及著作權之侵害。”不過在commons的管理員Jameslwoodward卻無視相關的規定，更指出台灣的FOP不包括任何室內環境的照片。要是這樣的話，恐怕大量台灣條目的室內建築圖片也被列入提刪，對維基百科造成嚴重的影響。希望維基台灣人能夠多關注相關討論

Mary Pickford with a movie camera in 1916 - not Canada

Good day. Per en:w:The_Pride_of_the_Clan, the location of the Mary Pickford with a movie camera in 1916 photo is Massachusetts, not Canada. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

@Infrogmation: But she's Canadian.--Kai3952 (talk) 08:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Yes. Category says "in" not "of". She was IN Massachusetts when the photo was taken. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

@Infrogmation: Got it now, thanks.--Kai3952 (talk) 07:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Kai3952. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Beeblebrox (talk) 21:25, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Pity you left

Dear Kai3952, It's a pity you left Commons. I hope this is temporarily, and that we will see you and your useful contributions back one day. Thanks for the nice work you did. Vysotsky (talk) 13:47, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

@Vysotsky: Did I say that? I just said I stopped uploading photos.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Tongyong Pinyin category, etc.

Hey Kai3952: I am always glad to see you out there doing this categorization work. I know you may still be angry at me; if so feel free to totally ignore me here. But I want ask for your perspective on Category:Pinyin Category:Tongyong Pinyin and Category:Wade–Giles. How would you set them up? Any problems with the way they are now? Would you just delete them? Do you still want to remove some of the images? What are your criticisms today? Thanks for your work. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 23:42, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Perhaps instead of harassing me you should give your time to do beneficial things for Commons.--Kai3952 (talk) 01:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Buffers at Luodong Station

Category:Buffers at Luodong Station is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD C2 (unuseful empty category) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Palosirkka (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Buffers at the Takao Railway Museum

Category:Buffers at the Takao Railway Museum is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD C2 (unuseful empty category) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Palosirkka (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Email Reply

请在您的中文维基百科讨论页进行申诉。这边我爱莫能助。Stang^★ 01:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

@Stang: 謝謝--Kai3952 (talk) 01:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Vandal

Well, I just said "check their contributions" which already showcases the fact that (s)he was engaging in insults, there is no need to write additional information other than what can already be easily seen by an admin. I assume that the admins who take requests from that noticeboards actually investigate reports and can see their actions for themselves. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Kai: That can be tough when the reported user does not exist. Please be more attentive to detail.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:00, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Re: File:Train at Platform, Tamsui Station 2020-11-13.jpg

喔喔不好意思，因為我就是大量上傳處理容易弄錯，順勢就都放上一樣的分類，當時也沒想太多，想說有拍到月台門上的路線圖就放Platforms at Tamsui Station分類了，原因就是這個樣子，如果您覺得不妥可以移除沒關係--T Gordon Cheng (talk) 15:27, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

不好意思，我並沒有經常上站，因此沒看到您的留言。這不是系統的問題，是我大量上傳時，沒有多想就把每張照片放上一樣的分類，直接不斷複製貼上，至於把這張相片歸類到月台的原因就如我上所述。使用上傳精靈的時候，最下面會有分類，我就是在這裡貼上分類，當時我是一併上傳淡水站的照片，所以分類倉促，在月台拍的我就歸類到月台了，純粹是沒什麼思考就做才會這樣。--T Gordon Cheng (talk) 06:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

是手動加入分類的沒錯，然後我認為我有拍到月台門，所以歸類到Platforms at Tamsui Station --T Gordon Cheng (talk) 03:32, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

我的話您要每一次都搭配著看比較能理解，我前面已經說了，我是大量處理，在單張照片的所費心思很少，所以我就直接認為月台門也是月台的一部分，故作此分類，您不用一直執著在這上面，我原因就如此敘明--T Gordon Cheng (talk) 10:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

RE: File:縣道170號南勢竹路段.jpg

這是個很好的建議，也感謝您對於描述的修飾。雖然拍攝位置位於南勢竹，但全景皆為下庄仔，因此以南勢竹為檔名一部分會有些不妥。由於這張照片的拍攝位置正好位於布袋鎮與朴子市界，因此想將它命名為File:縣道170號布袋鎮與朴子市界。--StevenK234 (talk) 15:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

History merging and splitting Requests

Thank you for your work with identifying images that needs to be split. But I feel that you do not have to add {{Split}} template and add a request at Commons:History merging and splitting/Requests. Just one is enough. I will prefer former because its a lot of less work for admins to keep track of both the pages and update the requests page for each split. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Re: File:Hsinchu Interchanges (95A) 新竹交流道公道五路匝道-2.jpg

感謝您再次對於我分類相關問題的指教，上次那件事情我也體會到您的難處了，分類真的是很不好做沒錯。可是您所說的新竹科學園區的巴士，那應該是本站沒有給予精確的分類讓我使用，我是想要表示它們是科學園區的巡迴巴士 (由科學園區管理局開辦並營運)，但沒有適合的分類，所以才這樣放。之所以不分新竹市跟新竹縣，是因為我的目標不是要顯示我是在什麼地方拍的，而是它們是科學園區所屬之巴士，但我只能放在最大的分類目錄下。

我清楚在上傳當下就要分類清楚以減少別人的困擾，但本站的分類如此之多，我都不知道一張照片能有這麼多分類可用，例如您幫我添加在「公道五路匝道-2.jpg」的那一些。我都是後來人添加我才知道有這分類可以使用、我上傳的照片符合這些分類的條件。

此外您的建議很好，但是放上座標是很花時間的，確實如您所說，我上傳照片量大，所以我不可能在一張照片上面著墨太久，但我也同意照片上傳的意義是要讓別人能取用，說明我之前以為這樣打就夠清楚了，以後我會盡量在說明欄中敘述清楚我在哪裡拍攝、拍向何處。標題部分因為我英文不好加上不清楚如何摘要，所以都打得很簡單「該物+日期」。謝謝提醒，也謝謝您對本站照片分類付出的努力。--T Gordon Cheng (talk) 13:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Re：請原諒我的無心之過

先跟Kai君說聲抱歉，本小姐將電子郵件選項設為「不要傳送任何通知」，因此並未查看。個人而言並不認為該兩個類別有何「誇張的錯誤」，也不認為Kai君有任何過失，反而需感謝你作出的分類整理，才能讓本小姐發現所羅門君的貢獻，故然也無法提出建議。正題方面，經抽查過後，所羅門君上傳的圖片確有約3-5/10為經外部人士同意再上傳（抽查步驟為每頁500筆數的ListFiles第1頁至第10頁），而非本人拍攝，且不是絕大部分，其他皆為個人之作（除非簡介不實），因此不會對推薦理由作更動。以貓貓的日記本、Wpcpey及三獵等維基攝影專家/大師為例，他們上傳的圖片也有部分非攝自本人之手，再者如此龐大的整理外部圖片及與原作者交涉的工作，本小姐認為所羅門君對此獎仍是實至名歸的。另外若然Kai君對提名有所疑問或意見，應移玉步至授獎提名投票，而非在Commons或Gmail寄信，一來可能被忽略，二來也左右不了評審本身。最後祝編安w —Mısaka✨M1koto 11:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

「本小姐」只是一個網上自稱，是跟我女友之間的玩笑，她扮男，我扮女，這樣挺好玩的，因此沿用至今，僅此而已，若然Kai君不喜，以下將以「我」為第一人稱。「攝影專家」在中維的定義是「表彰在照片上的貢獻」，並無規定圖片必須由上傳人親自拍攝，若然對此有所異議，可前往中維那邊的互助客棧開篇討論，跟我在這邊談沒有意義。提建議方面，個人已說明不覺得Kai君在這兩個類別做錯了些什麼，更表明希望你繼續作出整理，所以恕我愚昧，實在不知道如何給出反饋。最後還是再重申一遍好了，我不會撤銷提名，提名詞就算再有其他版本，也只是小修小改，如果Kai君對提名本身有任何意見或想作出反對，請至提名頁發言。 —Mısaka✨M1koto 11:02, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

我在6月1日的時候就看過Kai君所發的郵件了，但說來慚愧，我忘記回應了，若「File:CTCE Matsuki MS-101 back.jpg」的情況屬實，回報Deletion requests會好一點。然後我真的想不出任何建議，就別迫我了。—Mısaka✨M1koto 13:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)