User talk:Kai3952/Archive 6

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Earthquake Memorial Sites

Hello, Kai3952. My apology for this. My edit was in good faith, but indeed I thought that it were monuments for victims, which was a mistake. Greeting, Eissink (talk) 11:35, 22 September 2020 (UTC).

@Eissink: Look, what you said was harsh, but you seem to choose making mistakes (you only care about my tone instead of the correcting as you said). I believe that too is a problem if you start taking your mistake for granted. I already told you that there is enough information to show that the category "921 Earthquake National Memorial Sites" is not a memorial to the victims. I'm not sure why you would resist this so strongly.--Kai3952 (talk) 16:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)::
I don't resist it at all, after my initial mistake. You reverted my edit, saying "Except for you, no one will mistake the memorial sites as the victims." That is just short of saying "Only an idiot like you would make this mistake." I then thought it the best to acknowledge my mistake, here on your Talk page, and apologize for the wrong edit. You must have completely misunderstood me from the beginning. I mean, I made a mistake, which can happen to anyone, even if it was a stupid mistake, and then all I did was apologize, but then you came back saying "If your edit is in good faith, why don't you see that it is categorized under Category:Protected areas of Taiwan subcategory? I don't know how to explain to you that you should first understand etc. etc.", which to me seems totally unreasonable. If this is all not a misunderstanding, then I don't know what you are trying to achieve. I hope we can end this discussion. I wish you the best, Eissink (talk) 16:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC).
@Eissink: Hmm...Where is your point? Now that I've done what you said to do (see: special:diff/467950121), but I'm still facing problem: why you want me to stay away from you?--Kai3952 (talk) 17:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
I said that because you kept coming back in what I thought was a completely unreasonable manner, asking me why I don't understand etc. etc. when I already completely understood that I had made a mistake. Eissink (talk) 17:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC).
@Eissink: Now it seems that I am unreasonable because your mistake is caused by me. I should not corrected to you in an accusing tone. Can you tell me where is the problem that I have made (which means that this page: "Category:921 Earthquake National Memorial Sites")?--Kai3952 (talk) 17:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Your question is not clear to me. My mistake was of course not caused by you, but you seemed to question me áfter I had already acknowledged my mistake, a mistake that was created because I did not read good enough. Eissink (talk) 18:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC).

戶外藝術品著作權

智慧財產局的月刊都講這麼明白，你哪來的依據說台灣的FoP不適用於2D作品？--Reke (talk) 03:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

自己看。 Wikimedia Commons 的模板處理可能是舊法或是根本搞錯，但你提的這張還是從文化部的比賽中轉移過來的，稍微有點判斷力都會思考政府部門有專門的法務部門審，都讓它留下來了，是不是維基人搞錯，會再去查一下法律規定，而不是引一個可能不精確的維基人這樣說就提刪下去。現在主管機關的文獻寫得夠明白了，麻煩自己好好思考一下，未來是反正看起來不合規就提刪再說，還是自己該基於對別人上傳心血的保護，多一點查詢、甚至去修正維基人的認知錯誤。--Reke (talk) 11:39, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
我懶得回答你維基的動作以外的問題。--Reke (talk) 11:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
維基上頭不是作者一樣可以提出意見，我跟那張圖的無論有沒有關係，都一樣可以質疑你為什麼要這樣處理。--Reke (talk) 12:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

維基的五大支柱裡有一條就叫「不要墨守成規」。這個規則一查文獻就知道錯了，智慧局出版品上明確寫出拍攝牆上彩繪無需授權，你什麼都不查，反正毀人心血的責任就推給規則，就是這樣的態度才會老是惹人厭惡。這裡不是法律試驗場，我們就算明白規定如此，也會努力先去查清來龍去脈，去做你所謂的保母工作。我想你應該去問問你信賴的人，當這種情況明顯地可以發覺維基的規定與法律實際情況不符時，是反正提刪就對了，還是應該主動去修正規則。我相信其他人也會給出跟我一樣的答案。--Reke (talk) 14:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Unwanted email

Hi, I am sorry for you, but I don't see why you sent an email to me. Please do not send unwanted emails, or you may be reported. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:49, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Seconded.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:56, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

CropTool

In the future, I would appreciate it if you used CropTool to crop images. This tool allows users to crop images already on Commons without having to download the images. It also makes sure that, if necessary, the file has already passed license review. It also properly links the images to one another, in case an issue with them comes up later. Elisfkc (talk) 18:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Roslyn photo

I never uploaded it to Commons; I've been meaning to do so (along with some or all of the other photos on the page). Feel free to do so. LINYperson615 (talk) 22:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Guangming_Lights

Category discussion warning

Guangming Lights has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 04:13, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Discussion on Zaociao Image

Hey Kai3952. If you have time, please let me know what you are thinking about the Zaociao image that was removed from the Tongyong Pinyin category. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 19:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Sun shines on Cimu Bridge and Orchid Pavilion.jpg

File:Sun shines on Cimu Bridge and Orchid Pavilion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:36, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

ANU

"Are you deliberately provoking me? I don't care what you say, I don't want to quarrel with you. Stop pinging me!" - The actual fuck is your problem?, You went to ANU crying over a user pinging you .... so I gave you (and him) options on how to mute pings.
If you don't want to be fucking helped than don't fucking go to noticeboards genius. –Davey2010Talk 12:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Please remain calm and collegial

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

This is in reference to this edit.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 3 months
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 months for the following reason: ongoing harassment by playing the victim..

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

العربية ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Gaeilge ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mys_721tx (talk) 07:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Unblock

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "我意識這一次是我第二次drama，繼上一次封禁之後，現在仍再犯，所以我承認我的確不應該藉故drama。無論我背後有什麼合理的理由，我都不應該以drama方式騷擾Wikimedia Commons，所以我經過反省之後，我決定接受社群的建議，要嘛就是避開他們，要嘛就是繼續做自己而無視他們。總而言之，我會試著改變自己，以求得Wikimedia Commons社群可接受我。不過，如果社群決議，我有封禁的必要，我可以接受繼續封禁。附帶一提，因為有人查到我偷偷使用電郵騷擾，請管理員自行斟酌是否加重封禁，我就不為自己辯解了。--Kai3952 (talk) 13:34, 30 May 2021 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "Kai has withdrawn their unblock request (see talkpage history). Non admin closure. –Davey2010Talk 18:22, 30 May 2021 (UTC)"
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
 (Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ Simple English ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ हिन्दी ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

由於我收到某些台灣人來信，經解釋仍不聽，因此我只好在這公告:

  1. 無論你對我的編輯或討論有何問題，基於善意，我已經有答覆，但我收到Davey2010警告，不得再電郵他人，因此在三個月封禁期滿前，我不會再回信答覆
  2. 經答覆，若是有必要討論或處理，我會安排在三個月後封禁期滿，盡快找出時間為你們提供幫助，所以在此之前，請耐心等侯，並且不要趁此機會在電郵中與我爭執，這可能會害我被延長封禁，甚至於永久封禁，希望你們配合
  3. 我那些電郵所寫的事，是基於回報我在封禁前處理進度或已解決的，只是礙於封禁，原本應該在討論頁，因此改在電郵回報，其中有些事需要等我封禁期滿才能開始執行，並非如某些人謠傳我利用電郵找人吵架，請不要將我的善意與盡責視為敵意，如果你們不滿，你可以找管理員，或者等我封禁期滿，我再來看看你們的不滿是想要我怎麼做，儘管如此，我還是堅持之前所說，超出我範圍或是你要求之事只有管理員能幫忙，那麼請恕我不能聽你們的話去做--Kai3952 (talk) 12:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

致：Mys 721tx、受害的台灣用戶、受害的commons社群

經過這次封禁，這幾天我反省Mys 721tx說的話，我承認是我做錯了，在此我鄭重向你們道歉，我會將此案與zhwp合併處理，以確保未來不再發生，所以在三個月封禁期滿後，我會提出改過方案（提出之前，我仍需要經由討論，才能了解你們要我怎麼做，以及現實情況的可行性），然後公告在我的用戶首頁，以示我改過的誠心，也是向你們的承諾，其中我已經先向受害人電郵，向他們允諾我不再犯，並且願意釋出善意，以我範圍及能力之內可做到，我會儘可能滿足他們，以求避免未來重演此案--Kai3952 (talk) 14:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Kai, Hope all's well, Just wanted to add that actions speak louder than words - People will believe you more (that you're sorry and that you'll change) by changing once the block's expired. Actions really do speak a lot more than words.
Instead of coming back every other week it might be a good idea to stay away for 3 months as continuing to come back every other week gives the impression you haven't changed. 3 month blocks are easy and if you don't focus your thoughts towards Commons your block will fly by :).
Enjoy the weather (if it's hot there) and just enjoy the things you enjoy doing for 3 months. Take care. –Davey2010Talk 14:16, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
@Davey2010: Since then, nearly eleven months have passed away. I thought people would accept me once they got to know that my account have been blocked for three months, but I found that this was not the case. Not only did they stay in the impression I haven't changed, but their disgust was worse than I could imagine.--Kai3952 (talk) 04:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi Kai, Indeed, A year has nearly passed and it looks like you've been a much more constructive editor, I'm pleased that all is going well :0, Take care. –Davey2010Talk 22:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Yes, I am sorry for my misbehavior and I want to apologize to everyone. I admit I do have a non-inclusionist stance on such things and I thought maybe I should confess that I have Asperger's syndrome. Despite this, I still feel personally attacked by his words. Anyway, the blocking admin and you both indicated that Asperger's syndrome is NOT a personal attack. There is nothing I can do about it, I can only choose to accept it. So I promise you that I no longer hold anyone accountable for the words that had caused the hurt. This means that anyone who attacks me will not violate the civility policy.--Kai3952 (talk) 19:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kai3952/Archive_6&oldid=814472594"