User talk:Juandev/archive 1

English: Welcome to the Commons, Juan de Vojníkov!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SB_Johnny | ^PA! 21:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Solar system intro.png[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Solar system intro.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Fil nik 14:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Las Palmas de Gran Canaria-Wikiversity.ogg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 13:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ten Namibia Dollars banknote, front site.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 18:47, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ten Namibia Dollars banknote, back site.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 19:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Licence obrázků[edit]

Ahoj, odpovídal jsem ti na mé stránce, asi jsi nečetl. Ano, prosím pověz mi co vís ohledně těch licencí obráků.

Jsem buddhista a máme rozsáhlou databázi obráků, které můžeme používat. Uváděl jsem i jméno autra a že to bylo z "Diamondway buddhist archive". Ono to nestačí??

Toto například určitě dělal někdo z mých přátel:

Image:K16-mahamudra.jpg‎

Description H.H. 16th Karmapa Rangjung Rigpe Dorje

Source Diamond Way Photo Archive, Zürich

Date 1972

Author unknown

Permission (Reusing this image) must mention Source

Díky. Můžeš mi psát i e-mail cézet, se jménem smid tečka petr. --PetrVera 09:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified plants[edit]

Hello, please note that Category:Plants is a main category that should NOT contain images. The correct category for images of unidentified plant is Category:Unidentified plants. -- Ies 18:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uf, sorry. Now nearly all plants are identified (partly by Bloom Clock Project and partly by user:Beentree). So I will start to recategorise them to appropriate species categories. There are many of them and manually it will take long time. Next time, I will upload images to the category of unidetified plants. If you dont want to wait, let me know and I will ask someone to move them all roboticaly to category of unidetified plants.--Juan de Vojníkov 11:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT??[edit]

Hi, I read your message, it was in an impossible italian, so i didn't understand... What are speacking about?? --Llorenzi (talk) 15:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OH sorry. Lets forget - I thought you dont understand English.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 09:36, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Arrangement of cocci bacteria.svg[edit]

sorry, se que soy algo lenta para contestar mis mensajes pero es que he estado algo ocupada. en fin, hace algun tiempo me preguntaste sombre esta imagen. La imagen la hice en adobe illustrator y la rason por a cual no encuentras el texto en el codigo es porquelo he convertido en trasos. si quieres puedes tratar de traducir la imagen usando la traduccion checa. o usando un programa de vectores como inkscape (que es gratis) -LadyofHats (talk) 11:18, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish recordings[edit]

Hi, I think it's nice to see people recording sounds from different languages, but I guess it's a mistake when they don't pronounce them correctly. About your recordings in spanish, your accent is quite different to ours and I think you should say it clearly: "foreign accent", and never "spanish accent". I'd suggest you recording sounds in your mothertonge instead of uploading sounds from different languages, because that could confuse people looking for sounds to learn, and I also think it's worthless to record sounds when they're not what they're meant to be.--Onanymous (talk) 13:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, my friend. We needed some pronunciation in Spanish for Wikiversity and there were no files available nor people who could do it. So I guest it is better to have somethink then nothink. If there will be quality recordings from native speakers I think you can remove mine.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 19:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Detail vstupu do Domu zemědělské osvěty, ulice Slezská, Praha.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 07:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jižní vstup do Domu zemědlěské osvěty, ulice Slezská, Praha 2.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 06:46, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dům zemědělské osvěty, ulice Slezská, Praha.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 06:47, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dům zemědělské osvěty (vlevo) a další dům (vpravo).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 06:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Východní fasáda Domu zemědělské sověty.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 07:04, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vstup do knihovny UZPI.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 07:05, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jižní vstup do Domu zemědělské sověty, ulice Slezská, Praha.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 07:05, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XO-Beta1-mikemcgregor-2.jpg[edit]

Za tohle sis to u mě teda dost rozházel... :D.--Kozuch (talk) 15:09, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pluto_highest_res.PNG[edit]

File:Pluto_highest_res.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mangostar (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Need you opinion[edit]

Thanks for reviewing my candidate on the Lomatium species. Can you check one more time? I wrote something and need your opinion. Thanks ZooFari (talk) 22:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi![edit]

Nice to meet you again here on the Commons ;-) (we've met in Białowieża on 2007 WMPL Conference, if you don't remember) odder 11:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, without your face not.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 12:47, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

cc-licence[edit]

I've added the licence you needed for file:Knoppar på Raud Torstein, bløming seint i mai 2005 i Oslo..jpg. --Jorunn (talk) 16:31, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

cc-licence[edit]

Rado se stalo. ;) Diky za spolupraci. -- Darwinek (talk) 14:12, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ano, ano. :) Avsak ve Slezsku, nedaleko hranic s Polskem. - Darwinek (talk) 10:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, tak to mám ještě větší radost.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 11:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carte02.gif may be deleted[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ русский ∙ suomi ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

Carte02.gif which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("Carte02.gif") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

HersfoldOTRSBot^{(talk/opt out)} 16:05, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Juandev!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 16:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Flowering plants BCP 040.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Růžový sad - Lidice 05.JPG was uncategorized on 7 October 2009.
Image:Shrnutí editace (založení článku Chichicastenango).png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Editační okno.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Registrace na Wikipedii.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Shrnutí editace (Juan).png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Tlačítko Uložit změny (Chichicastenango).png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Tlačítko Uložit změny.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (016).JPG was uncategorized on 19 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:15, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (014).JPG was uncategorized on 19 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:15, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (017).JPG was uncategorized on 19 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:15, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (015).JPG was uncategorized on 19 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:15, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Královská zahrada, rekonstrukce královského letohrádku (003).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Radnické schody směrem na Hradčanské náměstí.JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, schody z Úvozu na Loretánské náměstí.JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (004).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Betonová kotva (003).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (010).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (013).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Pražský hrad, dekorace mříže Zlatého portálu - detail.JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Pražský hrad, dekorace mříže Zlatého portálu.JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Betonová kotva (005).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Pražský hrad, býčí schodiště - vstup.JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Radnícké schody, detail výklenku.JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Prašný most, úprava okolo sochy lva.JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Královská zahrada, rekonstrukce královského letohrádku (001).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (005).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Královská zahrada, fíkovna.JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (019).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (003).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (011).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Betonová kotva (002).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Královská zahrada, lípa před prezidentským domkem.JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Betonová kotva (006).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (009).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Úvoz.JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Betonová kotva (008).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Radnické schody směrem do Nerudovi ulice.JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Hradčany, Salmovský palác.JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (018).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (007).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Královská zahrada, na podzim.JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (02+).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Královská zahrada, detail zpívající fontány.JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (008).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Betonová kotva (007).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (002).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (001).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (012).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Betonová kotva (001).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (020).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Montáž věšáků (006).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Praha, Královská zahrada, rekonstrukce královského letohrádku (002).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Betonová kotva (004).JPG was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Konzole ze strany.JPG was uncategorized on 4 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:59, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Česká adjektiva (od a).ogg[edit]

File:Česká adjektiva (od a).ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--El-Bardo (talk) 14:03, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I. P. Pavlova v Karlových Varech[edit]

Ahoj. Nevím, z jaké mapy jsi vycházel, ale proti Mlýnské kolonádě už je Vřídelní ulice. Na mapy.seznam.cz mají sice tuto část chybně popsanou jako I. P. Pavlova, ale když se (na té samé mapě) podíváš na orientační čísla nebo na adresy hotelů, tak je zřejmé, že ulice I. P. Pavlova začíná u Gogolovy lávky a od ní vede k severozápadu k hotelu Thermal, zatímco na jihovýchod od Gogolovy lávky (tedy podél celé Mlýnské kolonády) už vede Vřídelní ulice. Bohužel, tyhle internetové mapy obsahují podobných chyb mraky. --ŠJů (talk) 21:48, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, díky za upozornění. Pokusím se to opravit.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 05:45, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, tak ty už jsi to opravil. No báječný!--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 05:48, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Opravil jsem jen kategorie a popisy - názvy souborů jsem nechal, do toho už se mi nechtělo se pouštět (i když by stačilo vložit šablonu {{Rename}}). --ŠJů (talk) 14:03, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated License[edit]

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Czech Wikiversity promo T-shirt 006.JPG, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 15:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Capreolus capreolus male p.jpg[edit]

No, i haven't :( Wikiversity? Look here. Przykuta (talk) 15:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, nice gallery. Thank you for the link.--90.181.34.66 15:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LED[edit]

V diskusi pokračuju tady, protože s Babkou už to nesouvisí. To já mám i jiné konkrétní problémy. Třeba rád fotím autobusy nebo dopravní informační tabule, ale pokud je hodně světla, tak mi automat fotí na krátké časy a z LED nápisů zůstanou jen nečitelné šmouhy, což jinak pěknou fotku autobusu docela pokazí. Už dlouho se chci dokopat k tomu, abych se pořádně naučil dělat s manuálním nastavováním času na svým foťáku, a že bych si taky měl otestovat, jakou frekvenci vlastně ty LED displaye mají a na jaký čas je musím fotit, i když pak zase aby člověk s sebou i v pravý poledne nosil stativ. Dokud byly jen split-flap nebo flip-dot displeje, tak tenhle problém nebyl. Fotit v noci prosvětlovaný dopravní značky nebo zastávkový sloupky tak, aby mi to značku nevypálilo do běla a přitom bylo viditelné i okolí, chce taky trochu kumštu - jednou se mi to skoro povedlo, ale asi na desátý pokus. Je dost věcí, co bych se rád naučil. --ŠJů (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, já se taky budu muset naučit s tím svým novým foťákem, ale nějak se mi nedostává času, nebo fotografie není mým primárním koníčkem. Nicméně jsem dospěl k názoru, že se asi vrátím ke kinofilmu a budu fotit černobíle. A leckdy si i říkám, jestli by nevyšlo lépe fotit kvalitní fotografie na kinofilm a následně naskenovat.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 06:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jak v noci, tak i ve dne: Vezmi foťák, nastav čas manuálně a udělej cca 5-10 zkušebních snímků s různými časy - hezky postupně jeden za druhým - od kratšího po nejdelší, nebo obráceně. Přes den stativ není potřeba, protože časy do 1/50 v ruce ještě udržíš (snad) a čím tam bude světla více, tím použij vyšší clonu. Chce to trochu si s tím hrát, ale pak člověk dospěje k nějakým hodnotám které mají určité výsledky a těch se drží. --Aktron (talk) 10:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Focení na kinofilm má možná nějaké výhody, ale zase nemůžeš všechno zkoušet na deset pokusů a nevidíš výsledek, dokud to nevyvoláš. A třeba problém s focením LED nebo s focením za tmy tam je úplně stejnej, protože na čas expozice 1/125 prostě ten LED nápis nevyfotíš, ať fotíš čímkoliv, a automatika i manuální nastavování taky funguje u obojího v principu stejně. Já o použití klasického foťáku uvažuju spíš pro případ nějaké cesty do ciziny, kde bych třeba 2 nebo 3 týdny neměl možnost dobíjet. Ale to už se mi stejně asi nestane, abych si zavandroval jako zamlada. Taky přemýšlím, že bych si nechal zdigitalizovat tuny starejch fotek, co mám na kinofilmech, ale skenování z filmu přijde myslím dost draho, když si to člověk nechává dělat. Svitkový filmy z dob mého nejranějšího dětství asi už nezužitkuju vůbec. Filmaři to prý dnes dělají naopak: že točí na digitální materiál a distribuční kopie pak dělají na klasický kinofilm. Ale řekl bych, že tak do pěti let už bude všechno jenom digi a na filmový pás už se budem chodit dívat jen do muzea, tak jako na žárovky a rtuťový teploměr. Však kdyby Evropská unie věděla, kolik vývojky jsem ve svém mládí vylil do záchoda...

Aktrone, tahle nějak bych to asi dělal, ale už jsem nějak zestárnul a nemám tu vytrvalost si se vším takhle pohrát a na pár minut se zastavit (tohle se mi povedlo asi na desátý pokus a stejně to není dokonalý). To když na chvilku půjčím foťák nebo mobil nějakému dítěti, tak to má ještě přirozené nutkání vyzkoušet si na něm úplně všechno... ale já už začínám bejt línej i přečíst si aspoň návod. Ale jo... Snad jednou konečně si to všechno vyzkouším a naučím se... Mimochodem, prošel jsem si důkladně spoustu kategorií na Commons a nabyl jsem dojmu, že prosvětlované dopravní značky jsou opravdovým pražským unikátem, jaký zřejmě už nikde jinde člověk nenajde, a kdoví jestli vůbec jinde byly. Protože v chudších zemích nic takového nikdy neměli a v bohatších zemích už mají dávno všude reflexní. A v Praze ty poslední postupně mizí. Pár nekvalitních fotek jsem už pořídil, ale zatím žádnou opravdu reprezentativní. Nechceš si to, Aktrone, taky vyzkoušet, jestli jezdíš po Plzeňský? --ŠJů (talk) 16:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ahojte, taky se připojím do diskuse. Kdybych osobně měl fotit tu zastávku v noci, tak bych asi volil blesk v režimu SLOW2 (odpal na druhou lamelu). Při tomhle nastavení se krásně prosvětlí pozadí dlouhým časem a popředí se „stopne“ bleskem. Jinak myslím, že na řešení podobných věcí a experimentování s foťákem bude ten správný prostor na workshopu v dubnu – pokud budeš tedy mít zrovna čas a chuť (…).

Co se týká prosvětlených značek, je to dobrý tip, taky se pokusím. :) Mimochodem na analog fotím i dnes, ale skeny černobílých papírových fotek na běžném skeneru jsou prakticky nepoužitelné… — Jagro (talk) 23:14, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Můžu zkusit kde je potkám. Ono ale není se čeho bát co se značek týče. Některé zůstávají na místech i velmi dlouhou dobu. Tak například jsem před nedávnem potkal (na lokalitu si bohužel nevzpomínám) ještě staré rozcestníky v žluto-bleděmodrém provedení. Prosvětlený značky někde cvaknout problém nemám a klidně to rád a s chutí udělám. --Aktron (talk) 16:39, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Já mám jen dva lacinější foťáky a nejsem si jistej, jestli tam nějaký slow režim vůbec mám. Myslím, že na obou mám jen čtyři základní režimy blesku (auto, červený voči, přikázat, zakázat) a nevšiml jsem si, že by něco podobnýho dělal některý ze speciálních režimů focení, o kterých mnohdy ani nevím, co vlastně doopravdy dělají, protože ani v návodu se to nepíše. Jinak když jsem hledal googlem něco o slow režimu, tak jsem našel zajimavý text o nočním focení http://gml.vse.cz/data/2008/12/jak-na-nocni-fotku.doc od nějakého Stanislava Horného, ale asi tam nebude o všech specialitách jako je focení svítících značek, ještě jsem to nepročetl. --ŠJů (talk) 01:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Návrh[edit]

Jak koukám tady na diskuzi tak jsi o tom již se ŠJůem mluvil. Takže budu stručný: S chutí do toho a půl je hotovo. --Aktron (talk) 16:35, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kostel v Kostelních Střimelicích[edit]

Ahoj. Koukal jsem, že jsi obrázek File:Kostel svatého Martina - Kostelní Střimelice.JPG původně zařadil do kategorie řeckokatolických kostelů. Pátral jsem všude po Googlu a nenašel jsem ani jediný náznak toho, že by tento kostel měl být řeckokatolický, a nevím ani o žádném historickém či demografickém důvodu k takové domněnce. Kostel uvádí v seznamu svých objektů římskokatolická církev https://katalog.apha.cz/web/katalog_detail.php?sablona_soubor=detail/farnosti_detail.xml&parametry%5Bfarnosti%5D%5Bid%5D=1708 (po sloučení farností spadá pod farnost Mnichovice a pravidelné bohoslužby se v něm nekonají). Do nové kategorie pro kostel jsem tedy tu řeckokatolickou kategorii nedával. Nedokážu si moc vysvětlit, jak jsi na to přišel: že by tě zmátl dvojramenný (tzv. biskupský) kříž na věži? Pravoslavný kříž vypadá jinak a řeckokatolíci, pokud vím, žádný speciální symbol nemají. --ŠJů (talk) 14:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nemusel si pátrat a rovnou se zeptat. Ano udělal jsem chybu. Je to samozřejmě římskokatolickej kostel. Dokonce bych o něm mohl i napsat článek, kdyby bylo více zdrojů.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 14:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Někdy je zase lepší se zbytečně neptat a radši si rovnou ověřit. V tomhle případě jsem předpokládal, že jde asi o chybu, a proto jsem ten údaj taky bez ptaní odstranil, ale radši jsem tě upozornil, protože jsem nemohl vyloučit, že jsi k tomu nějaký důvod měl (římsko- a řeckokatolíci mají společnou Biskupskou konferenci a tak není vyloučeno, že by si třeba půjčovali nevyužité kostely - co kdyby tam třeba byla nějaká ukrajinská ubytovna?). Jinak myslím, že prakticky o každém kostele by se dal napsat článek. Už máme články o všech českých obcích, třeba jednou budeme mít i o všech českých kostelích. --ŠJů (talk) 22:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ovšem já jsem si za ta léta zvykl nepsat býdné články, jako jsou např. články o řadě českých obcí. Tedy radši mám informačně obsažne a odzdrojované. --Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 06:37, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To je otázka, jestli cílem encyklopedie je spíše vyčerpávající poutavé vyprávění o náhodných nebo nejslavnějších pěti kostelech anebo jen stručné základní informace o 200 kostelech. Asi má obojí svůj smysl. Jinak, nemyslel jsem to jako naléhání na tebe, že bych tobě vyčítal, že jsi nějaký článek nenapsal. Myslel jsem to tak, že kostely mají relativně šanci, že se jimi někdo časem bude zabývat. --ŠJů (talk) 14:30, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Štítek[edit]

Tak jsem se koukl na http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:V%C3%BDrobn%C3%AD_%C5%A1t%C3%ADtek_karmy_Monsator_GGD_typ_125_lomeno_6.JPG a doporučil bych ti jednu věc - zkus to cvaknout z větší dálky a s větším zoomem - budeš tak mít jistotu, že se ti to nebude tolik "soudkovat", že to bude rovné a lépe vypadat. --Aktron (talk) 09:43, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation[edit]

Hello!

I have recognized your very good findings of the "Ducal Rotunda of the Virgin Mary and St Catherine" copyvio images. Thanks for this good contribution to Commons. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 16:06, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it was not recognized by me, but by user:Tlusta. Unfortunately he is a little bit lazy.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 16:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen some files got tagged by you. Anyway, thanks for helping out. --High Contrast (talk) 16:15, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Letokruhy buků v hornopožárském lese (006).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition and perspective --Haneburger 07:50, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tři turistické značky v Hornopožárském lese.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good now. Pitke 12:34, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gdańsk Główny, pociąg do Lęborka (train face at Danzig train station).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The crop is a tinsy bit tight, any chance you'd have anything wider? Rama 09:16, 30 July 2010 (UTC) Comment. Unfortunately not. I have already deleted the former image.--Juan de Vojníkov 19:38, 30 July 2010 (UTC) --[reply]
Despite the tight crop: QI for me -- MJJR 21:08, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Otava, pohled na pravý břeh pod obcí Vrcovice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition. --Manuguf 16:31, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gdańsk Główny (trains at Danzig train station - cropped 003).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Good image, but cropping the lower part (uninteresting foreground) would improve the composition -- MJJR 20:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC) Comment I was not sure, so I did 3. Could you have a look, please.--Juan de Vojníkov 07:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Cropping #003 is good IMO, so I promoted this one. -- MJJR 19:07, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

correct move template[edit]

Hello, can you correct your move request for Category:Czechoslovakian Wolfdog (which is now in the Category:Requested moves (date undefined)) by using the correct format of the {{Move}} template? --Havang(nl) (talk) 11:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I cant. I have already reported once, that this template is incredibly difficult.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 13:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You put into brackets {{ }} the following: move|new name|reason|3=date which is for this exemple: move|Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs|must be plural|3=2010-08-18 . That's all. May-be you will succees next time. --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thx. Hope Ill rember. But the syntax is different to other templates.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 18:31, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Memorial plaques in the Czech language in Písek District a další související kategorie[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:Memorial plaques in the Czech language in Písek District and some other related cateories have been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which they should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Zdravím. Zakládat kvůli jedné fotce pět kategorií najednou a v té nejnižší kombinovat tři kritéria se mi zdá opravdu moc. Dal jsem to k diskusi - případně se zkus zapojit (když klikneš na slova "its entry" v šabloně výše). Obvykle takto ukvapeně založené kategorie nenavrhuji na smazání, ale snažím se je aspoň zařadit do kategorií, do kterých logicky patří (což jsem udělal i v tomhle případě), ale tady se mi především ty nejnižší z takto založených kateorií zdají i do budoucna neudržitelné. To máš opravdu představu, že by se tímhle způsobem zakategorizovaly všechny pamětní desky? Chystáš se k tomu? --ŠJů (talk) 21:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Já řadím své nové fotografie, do kategorií které jsem založil.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 06:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No to je právě ten problém a chyba. Buď chceš jenom zařazovat své fotky, a pak se snaž přednostně využívat ty kategorie, které už existují (a rozhodně nezakládej žádné kombinované kategorie), anebo chceš zakládat kategorie, ale pak je také vhodné při založení jakékoliv kategorie do ní také vyhledat a zařadit už nahrané fotky (včetně cizích) - aspoň ty, které dosud byly v příslušných nadřazených kategoriích. Jinak tím děláš chaos, že zakládáš kategorie, ve kterých pak člověk nenajde to, co by v ní mělo být, protože to necháš někde jinde. --ŠJů (talk) 14:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nemám na to čas. Commons není můj hlavní projekt.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 18:45, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Však tě nikdo nenutí je zakládat. Vyber si sám, jestli tu chceš masově zakládat kategorie (pak je zakládej pořádně) anebo ne (pak ovšem respektuj existující kategorizaci). --ŠJů (talk) 04:04, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Outhouses[edit]

Zdravím. Opravdu ses podíval, co patří do kategorie Category:Outhouses, když jsi zakládal Category:Outhouses in the Czech Republic a vkládal do ní kůlnu File:Spolí (Vojníkov), kůlna na sadě.JPG? Když kategorizuješ, tak je dobré se nejprve podívat, jaké kategorie už existují a co v nich je - například v kategoriích Outhouses jsou pouze kadibudky a je to jasně dané i v popisu této hlavní kategorie i v jejím zařazení. Pro kůlny tedy bude případně potřeba najít nebo založit něco jiného. Z existujících kategorií se mi zdá nejvíc vhodná kategorie Sheds. --ŠJů (talk) 22:02, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Přiznávám, že jsem se do oné kategorie nepodíval. Můj postup totiž nebyl vzestupný, ale sestupný. Slovo kůlna jsem si našel ve slovníku a začal kategorizovat obrázceně. Jo ty Sheds vypadaj dobře.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 06:54, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

U většiny věcí slovník nestačí. Ve slovníku si můžeš najít pár tipů na překlad, ale stejně pak musíš zkoušet, jaké kategorie na Commons skutečně existují a co v nich je. Někdy to najdeš hned, jindy to dá fůru práce. Někdy se tak třeba nejmenuje žádná kategorie, ale můžeš třeba zkoušet ta slova hledat fulltextem a ono ti to najde obrázky, kde se to slovo vyskytuje v popise - a pak se podíváš, jestli některý z těch obrázků není zařazený v nějaké vhodné kategorii. Naštěstí většinou stačí hledat jen jednou, a až budeš fotit jinou kůlnu anebo zrovna tu kadibudku, tak už si to budeš pamatovat. Čím složitější a úmornější hledání, tím lépe a déle si to člověk zapamatuje. Jo a samzřejmě je užitečné se rovnou podívat, jak a podle čeho je ta nalezená kategorie organizovaná. Někdy je to třeba jak podle států, tak i podle barvy, typu a účelu, jindy zase podle ničeho a je najdeš tam pohromadě deset fotek z celého světa. V takovém případě asi nemá smysl zakládat hned podkategorii podle okresu. Zpravidla taky bývá užitečné si přečíst popis té kategorie: pokud je v názvu kategorie použito nějaké problematické synonymum nebo homonymum, tak pak třeba můžeš v kategorii Outhouses nebo v kategorii Sheds kromě vysvětlení, k čemu ta kategorie je, najít i odkazy na jiné kategorie - třeba i na tu, kterou zrovna hledáš. --ŠJů (talk) 14:25, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dovecotes in the Czech Republic[edit]

Zdravím. Pokud chceš opravovat nějakou chybu jako tady, tak si hlídej, ať místo jedné možná-chyby nezpůsobíš jinou chybu jasnou a hrubou. Může být sporné, jestli holubník jde chápat jak "building" nebo ne (on základní znaky budovy má, jako uzavřená a zastřešená stavba - viz en:Dovecote: A dovecote or dovecot is a building intended to house pigeons or doves. ), ale i kdyby sis to myslel a nenapadlo tě o tom diskutovat, tak když už se to rozhodneš z té kategorie vyjmout, tak to logicky zároveň musíš dát do vhodnější kategorie (tedy buď do nejbližší obecnější, anebo do nějaké přesnější). Ne že ti "holubníky v České republice" úplně vypadnou z České republiky a nejsou v ní pak vůbec nijak zařazené. --ŠJů (talk) 15:11, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To víš že můžu. Proto je to komunitní projekt. Co neudělám já udělá jiný. Takže díky za to a nechme tam structures.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 18:51, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Co neudělám já udělá jiný" ale platí při zachování určitých zásad, jako například že každá editace bude a) podložená a b) k lepšímu. Pokud kategorii smažeš místo abys ji zpřesnil nebo pokud děláš změny v rozporu se zjevným faktem (viz definici "building" nebo "budova"), který ti někdo navíc ještě dvakrát doloží (viz článek Dovecote), tak to není spolupráce, ale přetahovaná. --ŠJů (talk) 04:03, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Unidentified ponds in Benešov District[edit]

I deleted this category because it was empty and tagged for speedydeletion (empty and unsystematical category. It contained only 3 photos of identified ponds in Boušice) by User:ŠJů. -- Common Good (talk) 19:04, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. BTW you agree with the reason "only 3 photos"?--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 19:18, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The category was empty. -- Common Good (talk) 20:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And the 3 images depict ponds which are clearly identified, then they didn't belong into this category. --ŠJů (talk) 01:47, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zakládání CfD[edit]

Ahoj, při zakládání této diskuse jsi zřejmě přehlédl, že v úvodu diskusní stránky máš výrazný rámeček se stručným a názorným popisem tří kroků, které je třeba udělat: krom vložení šablony do diskutované kategorie ještě upozornit na diskusní stránce toho, kdo kategorii založil (obvykle je slušné upozornit i všechny další, o kom víš, že by je to mohlo zajímat nebo že by k tomu měli co říct) a třetí krok je vložit odkaz na diskusi na logovací stránku diskusí. To by asi tu diskusi sotva někdo další našel. Ten třetí krok jsem už udělal za tebe a ten druhý teď už nemá smysl, ale zkus být pozornější a číst po sobě šablony, které vkládáš, a stránky, které zakládáš. Bývají tam občas docela užitečné rady a návody. A jiná věc je, abys diskuse zakládal uváženě a nejen na základě toho, že ti přes hlavu přelétne nějaký nápad, který si ani neověříš a je v jasném rozporu s realitou. --ŠJů (talk) 01:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ale ovšem, toho jak jsou šablony na Commons složité si všímám už delší čas. Pokud mám udělat jen 3 další věci, tak snad šablona nemusí být dlouhá jak dálnice D1. obvykle je slušné upozornit i všechny další, o kom víš, že by je to mohlo zajímat nebo že by k tomu měli co říct - OMG! to už je ale buzerace ne, pokud to někoho zajímá, tak to má mít ve sledovaných!--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 06:02, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jiřička obecná v letu (002).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment I like the composition (who wrote the song?) but please crop away the half note (cut wing) at the top. --Quartl 09:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC) CommentI have cropped it. Is that better?--Juan de Vojníkov 11:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I support now. --Quartl 14:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Babička s vnoučaty[edit]

Díky moc!--Ondřej Žváček (talk) 16:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Detail závěsu (001).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Quartl 15:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zlivice, Zlivický rybník.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Mattbuck 21:50, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlouhé Pole, štít domu čp. 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment - can you increase the brightness a bit? Mattbuck 13:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is this better?--Juan de Vojníkov 02:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
SupportI think it qualifies now. --MichaelBueker 11:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malé Žernoseky, hlavní silnice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 10:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrtbovská zahrada, teatron, střecha.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Strange but good--Jebulon 21:23, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venuše a Adonis na fresce v sala terreně Vrtbovské zahrady.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Mattbuck 14:23, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrtbovská zahrada, sala terrena, průhled na antické ruiny - freska.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Mattbuck 14:23, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lednička Zanussi ZRA 319 SW, přihrádka na vajíčka v dveřní přihrádce.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The things people take photos of never ceases to amaze me. I'd have preferred it cropped at the bottom and left, but good. Mattbuck 14:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC) QuestionIs this better?--Juan de Vojníkov 16:51, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Listí na hrázi rybníka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Some leaves look like oak. Jonathunder 02:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Přírodní rezervace Malý Blaník, bučina (001).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Would it be possible to geotag and provide an English description? Jonathunder 02:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC) CommentI add further description, but I am unable to geo tag it - forest.--Juan de Vojníkov 08:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Křešice (Divišov), stavení u potoka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrad Oparno, zeď a Milešovka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:42, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Přírodní rezervace Malý Blaník, koruny stromů.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 15:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Přírodní rezervace Malý Blaník, bučina (002).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments a bit dark, but maybe it is so. Otherwise good--Jebulon 22:42, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Environmental data (File:Křešice (Divišov), stavení u potoka.JPG)[edit]

Sorry. I can't say that because I don't know what mean "environmental data". I remember read this, but I'm sure that I don't write this--Miguel Bugallo 20:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If I write this, now I can't remember what I would say, sorry--Miguel Bugallo 20:21, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 81ab34bd0b8139df5fd14f0edc02f182[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brdy, Malá Baba, bučina na svahu (002) .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me.--Jebulon 21:47, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prag under snow[edit]

Hello.
As I was happy to promote the two pictures above, I'm truly sorry for having declined your three last pictures about Prag under snow. The problem is allways the same: chromatic aberration, (fringing) . It is very visible in the three images, I'm afraid. It is not your fault, but the fault of your lens and camera. But please don't take personally my oppositions. Don't give up and come on ! I'm sure i'll promote soon some of other pictures of you.
Friendly from Paris (under snow too, but very few, melt on ground...)--Jebulon (talk) 00:37, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well I am not angry nor frustrated. I got my first digital camera and after one year I have realized it is time to study how to take quality images. Recently I have been to Fotoworskop, where I get some knowledge (but most of images I am uploading now are older). I will also have gorilla tripod and I am looking forward to organize here in Prague GIMP lecture/workshop via the local chapter, that we can manipulate pictures and well understand you guys, what you are calling to do with them.

Today we got the first snow here in Prague. Unfortunately I am ill from throat, but on other side I have time to upload some older pictures. Regards --Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 00:59, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes for a better health ! --Jebulon (talk) 14:59, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File: Laboratorní zařízení (001).jpg[edit]

to zařízení je skutečně autokláv, třída N, přidám i odkaz:http://www.geckooptical.com/autoclaves.htm. --BíláVrána (talk) 23:19, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, díky. Ono to vypadá vždy jinak.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 08:08, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot^{(talk/opt out)} 05:09, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ikebana v Jiřském klášteře.JPG

Beer![edit]

I replied to your message on my talk page. Sorry it took so long, I don't check commons as frequently as I used to. J.smith (talk) 17:36, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trees[edit]

Nemáte brýle? ;-) Man vyi (talk) 22:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Práce s navlhčeným svalákem (002).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File:Nádržkový_splachovač,_detail_plováku_a_zařízení_regulující_přítok_vody.JPG[edit]

File:Nádržkový_splachovač,_detail_plováku_a_zařízení_regulující_přítok_vody.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Reinhardhauke (talk) 16:51, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nádržkový_splachovač,_detail_plováku_s_ošroubovanou_krytkou.JPG[edit]

File:Nádržkový_splachovač,_detail_plováku_s_ošroubovanou_krytkou.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Reinhardhauke (talk) 16:52, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modrá turistická značka - detail (001).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality trail marker. IdLoveOne 08:21, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bellarie, druhé patro, putti.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 04:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sedlec Ossuary - Interior[edit]

Ahoj, máš ty obrázky přesunuté. --Mercy (talk) 12:49, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dík!--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 15:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neidentifikované místo[edit]

Zdravím. Můžeš, prosím, doplnit do popisu, kde byly tyto fotky pořízeny? Pokud si nevzpomeneš na přesné místo, tak aspoň čtvrť.

--ŠJů (talk) 23:09, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hotovson.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 06:38, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2010_sunsets[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:2010_sunsets has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 21:09, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vážky na Libuňce u Doubravic.ogg[edit]

Hallo Juandev, nice footage. I think you have filmed a couple of Calopteryx virgo in copula. Please use for video files also the video related categories: Category:Videos of Calopterygidae, Category:Videos from the Czech Republic, Category:Videos of 2011. Thanks and regards, --Pristurus (talk) 17:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, so many categories!--Juandev (talk) 15:27, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We try to get the video section of commons a little bit more well arranged. It will simplify the search for video content. In moment a reconstruction of the existing video categories is done by Queeg. Every video should be at least categorized into the video (sub)categories of Videos by year Videos by country and Videos by subject. We would be pleased with your helping support (as a multiple video producer). Thanks, --Pristurus (talk) 22:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Motd/2011-08-02_(cs)[edit]

Hello Juandev, you might want to create this template, see here for the English version. You can easily copy and paste the template stuff from there and translate the description to Czech (and adapt one parameter: 2=cs). --:bdk: 02:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jiřská[edit]

Zdar Juane, hele ty víš o nějaké jiné Jiřské ulici, nebo jen její existenci předpokládáš ?? Já jsem se to u většiny mnou zakládaných kategorií ulic snažil ověřovat a až na pár výjimek (čím dříve založená kategorie, s tím větší pravděpodobností nekontrolováno;-) by ulice bez rozlišovače tento neměli potřebovat. A zrovna u Jiřské nevím, že by jiná existovala. Jedudědek (talk) 10:17, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Předpokládám a sjednocuji.--Juandev (talk) 17:45, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, jinak Jiřská je opravdu jen v Praze a měl jsem za to, že rozlišovač se používá jen tam, kde ho je opravdu potřeba.;-) Jedudědek (talk) 08:45, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ladislav Janouch - kresba Jaroslava Janoucha.tif[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ladislav Janouch - kresba Jaroslava Janoucha.tif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 17:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ladislav Janouch - plastika Jaroslava Janoucha.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ladislav Janouch - plastika Jaroslava Janoucha.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 17:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrby v okolí Zákolanského potoka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 18:41, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrnčířské trhy Beroun 2011, z výstavy, Sylva Chňapková - Svazky StB.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 18:36, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berlin_Chapters_Conference_2011,_Wikimedian_taking_pictures_in_the_underground.JPG[edit]

File:Berlin_Chapters_Conference_2011,_Wikimedian_taking_pictures_in_the_underground.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Reinhardhauke (talk) 13:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dráty_vysokého_napětí_s_distanční_rozpěrkou_(001).jpg[edit]

File:Dráty_vysokého_napětí_s_distanční_rozpěrkou_(001).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Reinhardhauke (talk) 13:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berlin_Chapters_Conference_2011,_mirror_in_the_underground.JPG[edit]

File:Berlin_Chapters_Conference_2011,_mirror_in_the_underground.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Reinhardhauke (talk) 13:38, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hroutící_se_dům.svg[edit]

File:Hroutící_se_dům.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Reinhardhauke (talk) 13:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dráty_vysokého_napětí_s_distanční_rozpěrkou_(002).jpg[edit]

File:Dráty_vysokého_napětí_s_distanční_rozpěrkou_(002).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Reinhardhauke (talk) 13:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token d556807bd35d571141392fd2fd12680e[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vojníkov, zima 2010, planná hruška.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good, authentic colors. --Ralf Roletschek 10:28, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velký chotilský rybník, loď na hrázi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 19:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zaječí hovínka na Bousce.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments No appetizing motif but QI. --NorbertNagel 21:12, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlovy Vary, Teplá, detail usazenin a organismů pod Vřídlem.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting. Is this an aerial view? Could you explain? Could you please add geocoding? Yann 08:23, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is a picture taken from river bank. Without going there (its 130 km from the place I stay) I cant add exact geocoding.--Juandev 10:23, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Very good. --Yann 15:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlovy Vary, Teplá, detail usazenin pod Vřídlem.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Yann 15:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PP Pazderna, vrchol přírodní památky (001).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stu Phillips 00:21, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anagallis arvensis near Čičovický kamýk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, I think the crop can be improved. --Gidip 10:03, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nábytek[edit]

Zdravím. Mrkni, prosím, do kategorie Category:Interier Praha (furniture). Do stejné kategorie jsi zařadil i fotky výrobních štítků z UP závodů Rousínov (Category:UP závody Rousínov (furniture)) - zřejmě se obě fotky týkají téže závěsné knihovny. Dokázal bys roztřídit i zbylé fotky, který nábytek je z Prahy a který z Rousínova? Nebo má jeden a tentýž kus nábytku výrobní štítky z obou podniků? --ŠJů (talk) 13:51, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Když už jsi si s tím dal takovou práci, tak jsem to přeházel. Myslím si, že ty štítky byly na různých kusech nábytku, které po pravdě řečeno tvořily dřív jeden celek. Až budu uklízet, tak se můžu podívat.--Juandev (talk) 11:42, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 184d660be31b08dbcd407241201ef792[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!