User talk:JuTa/Archive 49

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Request for Restoration of a deleted file and Removal of source tag on his another File

Hi I have checked and found the file File:Rehamatullah Khan Durrani.jpg has been deleted by your good self and the other file [[1]] of the page [[2]] has been Taged for source provision other wise will be deleted hence I try to inform the uploader of both files but now the up-loader is no more available, so I have noted that these files are very old and of a Late person who is no more and both files have been uploaded under the licence of public domainhas and this provides protection to the files from unnecessary deletions. In the light of above you re requested kindly Restore the deleted file and remove the Tag about Source category on the other file to avoid loosing the valuable and precious information available for Wiki readers.45.116.233.29 13:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi: About the deleted image: It was claimed as own work of the uploader, which cannot be true. An the other file File:Rehamatullah Khan Durrani with Half Brother..jpg needs the decription to be fixed. It wasnt created 2012 as claimed, but when? Nor the photographer was User:Baloch Baba, but who? If that gets fixed the file can be kept. --Ju Ta 19:17, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for the prompt response, I have objection on the image file you have deleted File:Rehamatullah Khan Durrani.jpg which was uploaded under the public domain Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Pakistan and the other file you have fixed it with the source category , so in the light of above Commons Copyright policy and present scenario when the uploader is no more in the record, and the files uploaded in the 2012 and earlier was smoothly available for the readers and was not challenged on the source provision because I have noticed many files which have no source but the uploaders created those files from their own works due to lack of knowledge of Wikimedia Commons policy and I simply treat it a good work in the interest of general public of Wikkireaders. So you are once again respectfully requested to please Restore the deleted file and remove the Tag about Source category on the other file of the historically famous personality of Pakistan to avoid loosing the valuable information available in the library of WIKIMEDIA COMMONS for Wiki readers. 45.116.232.31 10:57, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

That other problems has not been discovered yet, doesnt solve the problem with that file. Fix it or the file will likely get deleted. --Ju Ta 13:08, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

So far Nobody has claims these Images, and the Photographer may already Died and I am sure these images are now public property right now, therefore these are still in Commons? however please look the matter in the provisions of {{PD-Malaysia}}, which indicated its could be remains in public domain, on the other hand you may please refer these to the wikki concerns for salvation of the problems instead of Deletion of the files in very easy way, Regards 45.116.232.3 13:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

What does Malaysia Copyright have to do with images from Pakistan? (thats the current claim). And about So far Nobody has claims these Images: Please read Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. If you have are find reliable sources, authors and dates for the images, please correct the file description pages. Otherwise the files will likely get deleted (not neccesarily by myself). --Ju Ta 18:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry ironically / mistakenly the PD-Malaysia was typed instead of {{tl:PD-Pakistan}}, I have went through the record of many files and particularly about the files in questions and come to conclution that the most important role of Wiki Editors are is to protect the history and files from unnecessary deletion because Deletion of History is one of the easiest way instead to protect them , however on the basis of NO BODY has Claim so far no one pointed out the said files sine 2012 except your good self, So it is once again to remind you please Restore the deleted file in question and remove the Tag about Source category on the other file by referring the case to someone else editor to work on it for the protections of the both files in question instead of adapting the easy way of Deleting the files / contexts, of the historically famous personality of Pakistan to avoid loosing the valuable information available in the library of WIKIMEDIA COMMONS for Wiki readers, Hopefully the matter will be consider in the largest favour of Wiki readers, 45.116.233.50 11:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi somebody else inbetween changed the second file. I now restored the 1st one and modified the description page accordingly. regards --Ju Ta 13:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot and I wish you all the Best,-- 45.116.232.4 09:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello again

I uploaded picture of kings of Malaysia again, with correct method about copyright, please checked it, if it still not allow on Commons, please help by explains correct method, Thank you --GRKMahawangsa (talk) 15:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi GRKMahawangsa, I'm sorry, but I dont think there is a correct method for those images. They are likely still in copyright. I now created a deletion request for them. You might try to ask their copyright holder to release the images under a free license like {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. If they agree they have to confirm this by sending a mail to the commons support team as documented in Commons:OTRS. regards. --Ju Ta 18:30, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Some images were took in when more than 50 years (according to about Malaysia copyright) but was edited by Federal government of Malaysia in 2011, if you think some images which took before 1970 but were edited and uploaded in later (I mean, 5 first images of kings of Malaysia were originally took before 1970 or 50 years ago but were edited and uploaded in 2011 by Picasa, according from those files's properties) is still be copyright since 2011, then you can delete now or waiting when I request for free license, Thanks again --GRKMahawangsa (talk) 19:24, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi GRKMahawangsa, I guess that the edits of the photos by the goverment has their own copyright, so that the latest date applies. If you get a positive answer from the copyright holders, please note that on the deletion request page, and add a {{subst:OP}} to each image description page affected. --Ju Ta 19:27, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for information, I'll request on government who owned copyright for free license (sorry for previous message)--GRKMahawangsa (talk) 12:17, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Plan Braniewa1635 2020 duży.jpg

Dear JuTa, could you pls restore these two files:

According to information received via OTRS (ticket #2020012910006132) both are scans or photographs of the imprint of the copperplate created in the year 1635 by Conrad Götke (the artist) and Paul Stertzel (a municipal official who drew the street map). The copperplate was commissioned by Swedish troops which occupied the city between the years 1626 and 1635. The original copperplate disappeared at the end of WWII when Soviet troops conquered the city. The history of the work is accurately described on pl-wiki in this article. Shortly said both files are PD. Thanks in advance for your help and best regards Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 02:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Pawel,

Done. Now please complete your OTRS task. --Ju Ta 05:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Done, thanks! Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 01:18, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

User page deletion

Hey, could you just delete my user page on commons? I want to use the meta user page which is better to handle. Regards and thanks --Keks by 09:04, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Done. Do you know {{Speedy}}? --Ju Ta 11:42, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

2020-01-14 de Vito.gif

Dear JuTa,
I am a quite unexperienced user. I see you changed the Wikimedia Commons page File:2020-01-14 de Vito.gif on 2c February 2020 at 02:17. Is now everything all right? What shall I do to go on using the file?
--Floridasso (talk) 10:51, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Well, the coat of arms in question are not your own work. Please give a source where you got them from and a reason why they can be published under a free license. regards --Ju Ta 18:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Dear JuTa, these are variatons on my family's coat of arms. The first time it was authorized is some way back (around 1300), then confirmed in 1912 by King Vittorio Emanuele III of Italy to my Grandfather, and again confirmed in 1967 by his Son Umberto II of Savoy to my Father, of whom I am the only heir (i would gladly insert here copies of the authorizations, but I imagine that would require having them uploaded in Wikikcommons). I commissioned this material drawing to be better used on-line. Do you deem that I should give proof of this particular commission? Please let me know.

--Floridasso (talk) 23:02, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Please put that to the deletion request page. I will likely not decide it. --Ju Ta 06:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Dear JuTa, tank you very much for your cooperation. I am so unexperienced that I cannot find the relevant Deletion Request page. It would be very helpful if you could send me the URL.

--Floridasso (talk) 08:47, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Its listed on your talk page (User talk:Floridasso), but again here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Giacopis. regards --Ju Ta 09:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Wiki Loves Love 2020/image list/header deletion

Hey, I created the page with blank content as a placeholder for a future header. The point is to already have it in the pages instead of having to add it manually to 29 pages. Chico Venancio (talk) 13:18, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Fine, recreate it as soon you have some content for it. --Ju Ta 13:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Can i correct a lot of filenames in the Category:F. van der Kraaij Collection?

Dear JuTa,

Our paths crossed last year, so i would like to ask you the following:

Am i allowed to correct the perhaps 100 or so filenames of the files i uploaded recently in two subcategories of Category:F. van der Kraaij Collection? Silly enough, i put "F van der Kraaij" instead of "F. van der Kraaij" in the filenames...

Ths is perhaps too large a file moving operation to be done without prior consent by a moderator? The images are not yet used in any Wikipedia articles, i think. (These two subcategories are not visible at this time, as they are deleted (temporarily, i hope) for missing OTRS permission it seems. The overall permission was given previously, so there should be no problem.)

Thanks for considering this question, Hansmuller (talk) 13:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Hansmuller, as you have filemover persmissions, you could rename each file using the "move" button at the file description pages. But I would care too much about a missing "." in the file names. regards --Ju Ta 14:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Issue solved

Were you among the people that presented the problem to me a while ago? The File you are looking for is now at

File:Spanish_Empire_and_Empire_of_Charles_V.svg

I have removed the deletion request since the problem has been solved by creating this second image.Barjimoa (talk) 11:37, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

hmm, I reverted now your actions, because you created a duplicate file and the DR was not decided by an admin. --Ju Ta 12:20, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Request restore images

Hello,

On the Wikipedia page https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arturo_Gilardoni two photos have been deleted:
File: Arturo-gilardoni-ingegnere.jpg
File: Arturo-gilardoni-formazione.jpg
because they contain "image within an image". We had already written for the ownership of the images and we write to you again to confirm that the images are our property. The photos come from the book "GIl-story 25 anni (1947-1972)" owned by Gilardoni S.p.A.

How can we restore the photos? We tried to upload the images again by adding the source but it is not allowed. Our user profile is Gil-men87

Thanks for your attention
Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gil-men87 (talk • contribs) 14:26, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Gil-men87, sorry but these files never got a confirmation from OTRS volounteers and never had a OTRS Template on their description page. I would recommand you ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for them. If you have a Ticket-Number please tell them this number. This makes is easier to find your case. --Ju Ta 16:30, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

About YDPA's images

Hello, JuTa, I received reply from Malaysian government officer, he tolds every pictures of YDPA (Kings) from Malaysia government can be use freely, do you have comment for this? --GRKMahawangsa (talk) 10:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi GRKMahawangsa, they have to confirm that by sending a mail to the commons support team - see Commons:OTRS - and naming the free license of their choice like {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} or similar. Once you know they have sent the mail you better notice that on the deletion request and put a {{subst:OP}} on every image affected. Regards --Ju Ta 10:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Request restore image

Hello!

Photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:МЛСП_%22Приразломная%22_%22Газпром_нефти%22.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1%5C has been deleted because of lack of license information.

This photo is distributed under Gazprom Neft Open Licence. Text of licence avaivable here https://media.gazprom-neft.ru/pictures/production/category688/otgruzka-nefti-mlsp-prirazlomnaya/VST_6001a.jpg.htm. You have to press on download icon and licence text will appear in popup window.

Could you please restore the photo. Thank you Rash-its (talk) 08:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I cannot find any acceptable license statement on that source page - see also Commons:Licensing. --Ju Ta 09:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Fehlbestimmung von File:Salix herbacea - Iceland -2007-07-12.jpg

fehlbestimmtes Bild
Salix herbacea
Salix herbacea
Zeichnung von Salix herbacea

Hallo JuTa/Archive 49, ich bin mir nicht sicher, welche Weide das fehlbestimmte Bild File:Salix herbacea - Iceland -2007-07-12.jpg zeigt. Aber Salix herbacea kann das nicht sein. Salix herbacea hat nämlich unterirdisch kriechende Stämme, in der Regel stumpfliche, rundliche Blättchen, die gezähnt oder gekerbt sind. Zudem sind die Blätter kahl und glänzend hellgrün. Nichts davon passt auf Ihr Bild. Leider habe ich keine Flora von Island, nur eine Artenliste aus dem Netz, vgl. [3] und dort [4]. Das fehlbestimmte Bild könnte eventuell Salix arctica oder eine ähnliche Art zeigen. Im Zweifelsfall sollte das Bild lieber in Category:Unidentified Salix und ggf. zusätzlich in Category:Misidentified plants wandern, falls es keine halbwegs tragfähige Bestimmung für das Bild gibt. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 14:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Robert Flogaus-Faust, Danke für den Hinweis. Ich hab' das Bild nun umbenannt und umkategorisiert. Gruß --Ju Ta 16:18, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Danke! --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Undelete request

Category:2010s photographs of Jordan is no longer empty. Please restore it. Thanks. --R'n'B (talk) 19:29, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Done. --Ju Ta 19:31, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:wikimeup deleted

Hi, I'm sorry but my colegous and I needed Category:wikimeup you deleted. The page is part of a scholastic project that involve two or thre hundred of young students (8 to 13 years old). I'm the first but asap the catgeory will have more contributors. Could you restore the Category:wikimeup? Ciao Matteo --Mattruffoni (talk) 09:56, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mattruffoni, I stumbled over this cat by working on Special:UncategorizedCategories. I tried to find some sensefull parent cats without success. Then I checked some of the images sorted into it like File:SetProdottoDivisoMCD.png or File:Cristalli di brina.jpg and found no connection to the external wiki (https://it.vikidia.org/wiki/Categoria:Wikimeup) linked on the description page. So I decided to empty and delete it. What is the inteded scope of this category? Can you name one or more sensefull parent categories for it? regards --Ju Ta 17:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Wikimeup is the name of a project. In this project quite 200 students collaborate and write entries and page on Vikidia, Wikiversity and wikivoyage, [5] . The images and the category you deleted wil be connected with: Vikidia, wikiversity, for example now you can see in [6] tutorial for middle school students. Wikimeup is a proijct that involves 4 school from primary to the liceo in differente activities. The creation of category wikimeup is the first step. So if you can please recreate. thanks.--Mattruffoni (talk) 06:19, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

OK, and what would be a sensefull parent category for it? --Ju Ta 06:21, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Wikimeup is a school project may be middle school would be the right parent category. Tks. --Mattruffoni (talk) 07:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

I restored it now, repopulated it, and made it a subcat of Category:WikiProjects. I made it a hidden cat too, because its not a topic cat. regards. --Ju Ta 18:36, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Please restore

Edits in Category:Bobadela (Boticas) deleted by you. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:58, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Done --Ju Ta 17:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Autor von File:Genus-Homo3.jpg

Sorry, ich habe ein Durcheinander bekommen und hoffe, ich hätte das Problem jetzt behoben. Das ursprüngliche Bild war File:Genus Homo.jpg Beat Ruest (talk) 15:26, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

I have requested a deletion; there also is an other mistake in the picture. Beat Ruest (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Flagge --> Löschnachricht

Zu den Nachrichten in meiner Diskussionsseite. Ich bin nicht der Autor, habe nur die Farben geändert, aber, in den Bildern steht klar der Name des Autors der Wappen in der Quellenangabe. Z. B.

File:Bandera de Cabrales.svg --> Escudo Wikimedia Commons autor SanchoPanzaXXI --> File:Escudo de Cabrales.svg
File:Bandera de Cudillero.svg --> Escudo Wikimedia Commons autor SanchoPanzaXXI --> File:Escudo de Cudillero.svg

Ich sehe nicht wo das Problem sein soll. --ecelan (talk) 21:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Der Link auf die Quell-Datei fehlt. --Ju Ta 06:22, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi ecelan, ich hab die beiden nun repariert - siehe hier. Falls es noch mehr gibt -> bitte erledige das doch selbst. Gruß --Ju Ta 17:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

My uploads via flickr2com

I saw that you detected duplicate files from uploads via f2c and deleted them all. Sorry you had to do that task.
Is there any way possible which will allow me to detect whether the file is available on commons or not? as auto-detection seems to be less useful when files are renamed.? or what is the way you are using to detect it? So that I will not upload the duplicates and there would be no need to clean the mess too? thanks QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 05:58, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi user:QueerEcofeminist, I find the duplicates through Special:ListDuplicatedFiles. But then its too late,the dupes are allready here. It seems the the tool Commons:Flickr2Commons is a bit buggy in indicates dupes, see also some sections on Commons talk:Flickr2Commons. The only way I could recommand is to check pre-starting a batch to check if images within in are allready on commons i.e. with google search example. regards--Ju Ta 07:26, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi user:QueerEcofeminist, I just realize that the google search is not realy working. But a commons search for the flickr number should work i.e. this. regards. --Ju Ta 18:12, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

user:JuTa, thanks, I will try and ensure that, I won't upload duplicates. Will use google search and commons search to find it before uploading anything. QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 05:24, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Dolphin club logo

Used with permission of Dolphin Club. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nealmueller (talk • contribs) 2020-03-08T07:52:03‎ (UTC)

Hi Nealmueller, they published the image under which of the here accepted free licenses - see Commons:Licensing and Commons:Copyright tags? And if so, the should document their release by sending a mail to the commons support team - see Commons:OTRS. regards --Ju Ta 07:57, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

There's no dispute here. Dolphin Club is a non-profit. Logo is only used on Dolphin Club wiki page. Nealmueller (talk) 14:41, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

But every image on commons must be reuseable for anybody in the world for any purpose including commecialy. --Ju Ta 16:55, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Legal Status File: Percy W Nelles Halifax 1940 PA-096505.jpg

Hi, at the bottom of the page on licence tab: "This Canadian work is in the public domain worldwide because it was subject to Crown copyright and was first published before December 31, 1969. According to Public Works and Government Services Canada / Travaux publics et Services gouvernementaux Canada, Canada has no intention of renewing expired Crown Copyright works in any country, and consequently the URAA does not apply. An email is on record at OTRS ticket 2013122310013986." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alyebard (talk • contribs) 16:39, 8 March 2020 (UTC) --Alyebard (talk) 16:39, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

The problem seems to be fixed now. --Ju Ta 18:35, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Vintage Crosley Wood Table Radio, Model Number Unknown, 5 Vacuum Tubes (13252033284).jpg and File:Vintage Crosley Wood Table Radio, Model 52TF, AM Band, 5 Vacuum Tubes, Made In USA, Circa 1942 (13252033284).jpg

Since when a file uploaded in 21:28, 6 September 2014 is the duplicate of the file uploaded in 14:23, 4 March 2020? They where the same exact image. Tm (talk) 22:42, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Yes, they were binary identical. But you are correct: The older copy should be kept. I swicthed now kept copy and redirect. There are currently hundreds of similar cases on Special:ListDuplicatedFiles and I must have misclicked this one. --Ju Ta 07:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Comment Thanks for your answer and sorry if my question night have seemed a bit harsh, as it was not my intention of being harsh. Everyone can make mistakes, in particular as you have deleted dozens (or hundreds?) of similar files. No harm done and good edits. Tm (talk) 20:33, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Katawa Shoujo Enigmatic Box of Sound Art Cover.jpg

Hi, I just added a license and I don't know how to remove the speed deletion process. Can you explain me how to fix the issues with my file license or stop the deletion process? --31NOVA (talk) 10:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi, NC-ND licenses are nor accepted on commons. By applying this you speedyd up the deletion process. --Ju Ta 19:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Dr George Ambartsoumian.jpg

Hey Ju Ta, Thanks for reaching out regarding image of File:Dr George Ambartsoumian.jpg. I found the image of Mr. Ambartsoumian through LinkedIn initially. I also found their Flickr Image link with creative commons attribution. Let me know the procedure updating the licence and I am more than happy to do it. Junaidbusn170 (talk) 16:38, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Junaidbusn170, the current source link just shows a "Page not found" and there is just no license template used on the description page. Please correct both: 1. a working source link where a free licnse is visible and 2) use the corresponding license template - see also Commons:Licensing and Commons:Copyright tags. regards --Ju Ta 16:43, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Please check again JuTA, I have attempted to add a link as copyright qualifier. This is my first attempt doing so and in order for me to succeed you might have to intervene a bit and walk me through. I would be able to follow your guidelines onwards. File:Dr George Ambartsoumian.jpg This is the link to image. Thanks. Junaidbusn170 (talk) 16:47, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

No, you need to edit the file description page like here on my talk page. --Ju Ta 16:49, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Done JuTA. I made an addition: self cc tag. I hope its correct. Junaidbusn170 (talk) 21:44, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Better now, but not yet good enough. The source link https://www.linkedin.com/in/george-ambartsoumian-ph-d-d-v-m-8ba81738/detail/photo/ still shows a "Page not found". We need a source link where the CC tag is visible. --Ju Ta 21:55, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Genus Homo.jpg

Hi JuTa!

Can you undelete the above file for a brief period so that I can import it to Wikiversity for fair use? Thank you in advance for your kind consideration! --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:33, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Hm, I would say no. O copyright vaiolation keeps a copyright violation even on wikiversity. --Ju Ta 04:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Jacqueline Straub 2020.jpg - Jetzt Ticket-Nr.: #2020032010003121

Hallo Lieber JuTa,

du/sie haben am 16. März 2020 um 12:32 Uhr das Bild "Jacqueline Straub 2020.jpg" aus dem dazugehörigen Artikel über Frau Straub, wegen fehlender Erlaubnis (vielen Dank) gelöscht. Ich habe dann Frau Straub nochmals angeschrieben. Sie hat jetzt die Bildfreigabeerklärung nochmal an Commons gesendet und die Ticket-Nr. #2020032010003121 bekommen. Könntest Du das Bild "wiederbeleben" und evtl. wieder in den Artikel einfügen. Für Deine Mühe schon herzlichen Dank im voraus.

Mfg

Wald-Burger8 --Wald-Burger8 (talk) 09:31, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Wald-Burger8, ich hab das Bild jetzt wiederhergestellt und mit {{OTRS pending}} versehen. Mit dem Einbinden in den Artikel würde ich warten, bis die Freigabe von OTRS bestätigt. Das kann u.U. einige Wochen dauern. Gruß --Ju Ta 09:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Super - schnell - wow! Gibt es irgendeinen Orden, den ich dir dafür geben könnte. Danke und Grüßle--Wald-Burger8 (talk) 09:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Sorted binary tree RGB.svg

Lieber JuTa,

es ist sicher ein ganz harter Job, die Dateien immer auf ihre Lizenzen überprüfen zu müssen. Und sie dann ohne Warnung rauszuschmeißen zu müssen. Hat bestimmt großen Spaß gemacht.

Man könnte aber auch überlegen, wie man den Upload-Dialog so gestaltet, dass gute Voreinstellungen für die allermeisten simplen Fälle drin sind, und man nicht eine halbe Stunde braucht, um sich wieder mal zurecht zu finden. Und eine neue Lizenz-Art durchzuarbeiten.

Ich glaube, Ihr wisst um das Problem und habt deshalb auch die so luziden Makros wie Licensing und Summary erfunden. (Ich habe bspw. nirgendwo eine Erklärung finden können, was der Unterschied zwischen dem Parameter {{Information|permission= und {{int:license-header}} ist.) Warum ist das manchmal ein extra Eingabefeld und manchmal nur ein Parameter?

Und kennst Du die Unterschiede zwischen

Ideale Lösungen
Eigenes Werk, Copyleft (Mehrfachlizenzierung GFDL, jegliche CC-BY-SA)
Eigenes Werk, CCO 1.0 (Verzicht auf alle urheberrechtlichen und verwandten Schutzrechte soweit gesetzlich möglich)
Bessere Lösungen (Mehrfachlizenzierung)
Eigenes Werk, Copyleft (GFDL, CC-BY-SA-3.0)
Eigenes Werk, Namensnennung (GFDL, CC-BY 3.0)
Gute Lösungen (Einzellizenz)
Eigenes Werk, Creative Commons Namensnennung-Wertergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Eigenes Werk, Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)
Eigenes Werk, Creative Commons Namensnennung-Wertergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Eigenes Werk, Creative Commons Namensnennung 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

? Ich zähle etwa 7 Abkürzungen, von denen keine erläutert oder verlinkt ist!

Für die genannte Datei habe ich die ganze Beschreibung von einer anderen Datei kopiert und nur leicht angepasst. Muss dabei was übersehen haben.

Ich probier's halt nochmal. Dabei erlebe ich Folgendes: Ich gebe ein:

== {{int:filedesc}} ==

{{Information

|Description={{en|1=Traversal of binary tree showing preorder-, inorder-, and postorder-position. Sequentialisation are:

|Date =2020-03-20

|Source ={{own}}

|Quelle ={{own}}

|source=[[:File:Sorted binary tree ALL.svg]] by [[User:Jochen Burghardt]]

|Author =[[User:Nomen4Omen|Nomen4Omen]]

|Autor =[[User:Nomen4Omen|Nomen4Omen]]

|Other versions=File:Sorted binary tree ALL.svg

}}

Aber er sagt dann:

Diese Datei hat keine Quelle.

Bitte ergänze die Dateibeschreibung und gib eine Quelle an. und:

Bei dieser Datei fehlen Angaben zum Autor.

Bei keinem dieser beiden Proteste kann ich klicken und meine Eingaben gezielt korrigieren. Dabei habe ich es ihm auf Englisch und auf Deutsch gesagt. Kannst Du mir helfen?

WP ist eine großartige Idee, und da man für das einfacher-Machen insbesondere in der Computerei immer schlechter bezahlt wird als für das komplizierter-Machen, ist das halt so, wie es ist.

Übrigens noch die Frage: Könntet Ihr das niedliche Futzel-Fensterchen (2 Zeilen sind's) für die en+de Beschreibung im Dialog "Datei hochladen" nicht doch vielleicht ein bisschen größer machen?

Besten Gruß auch ! Nomen4Omen (talk) 18:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Nomen4Omen,

zu der Datei: Da waren noch ein par Fehler auf der Dateibeschreibungsseite. Die hab ich jetzt gefixt: siehe hier. Du hattest geschweitfe Klammern an der falschen Stelle geschlossen, und auch einige Felder doppelt definiert.

wegen den allgemeinen Fragen zu Lizenzen: siehe Commons:Lizenzen, Commons:Lizenzvorlagen und dort verlinkte Seiten. Die verschiedenen CC-BY-... Lizenzen z.B. sind entweder unterschiedliche (weiterentwickelte) Lizenztexte oder Varianten jeweils für einzelne Länder angepasst. Die Unterschiede sind meist maginal, aber manchen Hochladern wichtig. Z.B. kannst Du ab {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} bei evtl. Verstößen als Urheber nicht direkt eine kostenpflichtige Abmahnung schicken sondern musst erst eine Frist zu Behebung setzen. Die genauen Lizenztexte sind in den Lizenzvorlagen jeweils verlinkt: z.B. cc-by-sa-4.0 bzw. ausführlich (rel. weit oben auf "license" klicken).

Gruß --Ju Ta 18:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Bula de Inocencio III Religiosam Vitam.jpg

Bonjour JuTa, la photographie n'est pas de moi, mais le document est une Bulle Papal de l'an 1201, depuis longtemps dans le domaine public, aussi je pense que j'ai le droit de publier le document? Le site Arquivo Nacional da Torre do Tombo http://antt.dglab.gov.pt/ ne précise rien. Merci Xicodaponte (talk) 16:07, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi, the problem was fixed inbetween as I see. regards --Ju Ta 18:40, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Merci, obridado JuTa Xicodaponte (talk) 13:04, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:Champ d’asile

Bonjour JuTa,

Une seule image appartient au champ d'Asile sur les 6 de cette lithographie. Il manque beaucoup d'autres catégories. Le champ d'Asile est une tentative de colonisation au Mexique, dans la région du Texas. Je pense qu'il faudrait attribuer une catégorie générale aux autres images puis créer 6 fichiers dérivés pour comprendre le discours de chacune et partant les catégories à ajouter. --Bel Bonjour, Ambre Troizat (talk) 16:59, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Feel free to do what ever makes sense but dont forget to add sensefull parent categories as well. Thx. --Ju Ta 17:55, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Dear JuTa, as I am working with 5 projects, I dont have time for "what ever makes sense". I will soon do something but only for "Champ d’asile". Best regards. --Bel Bonjour, Ambre Troizat (talk) 12:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Col Reynaldo Mendoza.jpg

Thanks for your feedback. That photo is a bit complicated. It's available online because it's a photo sold on Amazon. The photo was bought by the family of R. Mendoza. However the same photo appears on the book of "association of general and flag officers" (filipinaslibrary.org.ph/biblio/54777/) but resolution of this pic isn't good if I try to take a picture of it (I only have access to the hard copy of the book) - it's old, 1977 and smaller version.

So now I don't know HOW to tag it correctly if I use the amazon link photo publicly available or ask the family to scan the photo and send me for upload, or use what's online but write the copyright of the book photo with reference? Thank you in advance for your suggestions. --Bmaitai (talk) 12:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

IM sorry, but there is likely no fitting license tag for it. In most countries everything is protected 70 years after the death of the other. So it must be from before 1950 (or much more), which is not the case for a 1977 work. --Ju Ta 15:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

How do I modify the Harlem Arts Festival poster image file that you said didn't have the correct copyright?

I'm confused as to how I go in and modify the file, since its been deleted. Help!

The file is definitely a public document that is allowed to be used, since it was a poster that was put up, and is clearly on the Harlem Arts Festival website. What do I do?

Looking for any help you can give. Thanks!

Neal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Articlegooroo (talk • contribs) 02:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) The publishing of advertisings like this poster does not mean that it is in the public domain, as in "free to use for anyone". On the contrary, this was automatically copyrighted to the designer or the organiser of the festival when it was published, and nobody may use it elsewhere without a permission from the copyright holder. For an upload at Commons, the copyright holder would have to send an email as explained in COM:OTRS, or make a statement at their website that the poster has been released under a free licence. Otherwise we cannot keep it here. De728631 (talk) 02:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Gameday Faves - Illinois Fighting Illini Classics.jpg

Hi Juta, I am wondering how to fix the file I uploaded. I was of the understanding that album covers fell under the Fair Use section of copyright law, as every album page on Wikipedia has an image of its cover art, the majority of which are copyright protected. Did I do something wrong when I uploaded this album cover? Thrakkx (talk) 10:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Fair use is not accepted on commons - see Commons:Fair use. Maybe your local wiki accepts it, try to upload it localy to that wiki. --Ju Ta 11:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Quran logo.png

Hello JuTa, this file deleted under (No permission) reason, but why this file need a permission? it's only (Holy Quran) word in Arabic designed by the uploader! and it used on featured arwiki portal (replaced after your removal). Thanks on advance --Alaa :)..! 19:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Well, the calligraphic work looks to be copyrighable and its very likely not own work of the uploader as claimed. --Ju Ta 19:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Arabic font test on Safari 6.1-Mac.png

Hi. You recently deleted this. There’s still discussion about it on my talk page. I believe the licence posted was valid. Will you please restore the file until we can resolve this? Thanks. —Michael Z. 2020-04-02 00:48 z

Hi Michael. Well, it was originally called File:Screen Shot 2013-11-25 at 10.47.11.png, which indicated it was a screenshot of any software used but not the work of the uploader as claimed on the decription page. regards. --Ju Ta 07:20, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi. I don’t understand. Who was the uploader? If what was indicated was changed was it not because it was corrected?

I don’t seem to have permission to view deleted files on this wiki, so I’m depending on you here. As far as I can tell, I held sole copyright and released it under a permissive licence. Now this this image was improperly deleted before discussion about it came to any conclusion. Please restore it so we can determine the right action. —Michael Z. 2020-04-02 15:33 z

Hi, I restored it now and changed it to a regular Deletion request for further discussion. regards. --Ju Ta 17:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! —Michael Z. 2020-04-02 18:27 z

Category:Museum_of_Immigration_and_Navy,_Dakar

Category:Museum_of_Immigration_and_Navy,_Dakar has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Sije (talk) 09:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Please remove Confirmed right

You do not need Confirmed permission. Remove now! --Pikid (talk) 03:51, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, but what exactly you talking about? --Ju Ta 05:42, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

edit waring?

Hello

this photo is a Yigal Allon Center. befor you reverting me check youself. -- Geagea (talk) 00:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Geagea, then you should fix the coordinates of it. Currently its located of the northwest coast of the dead sea. I switch it to the corresponding Israel cat... --Ju Ta 00:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

The coordinates comes from Flickr. They might be confusing. -- Geagea (talk) 00:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

I changed both now. Maybe you can improve it. --Ju Ta 00:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for correcting the file. But the The more interesting qusten is why there is a category for a term "Palestinian territories" instead of "Palestinian National Authority" or "State of Palestine" which are entities. And why the bot of Rudolphous flooding this category. -- Geagea (talk) 00:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

This name came from the Open Street Map API based on the gps the file has. Rudolphous (talk) 06:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

@Rudolphous: Actually is was "Palestinian Territory" I changed it to "Palestinian territories" because the is Category:Palestinian territories but no Category:Palestinian Territory. PS: I'm working on Special:UncategorizedCategories I found that same for "Saint Martin", wich should be changed to "Saint-Martin (France)" because of Category:Saint Martin and Category:Saint-Martin (France) or Template:Saint Martin photographs taken on navbox and Template:Saint-Martin (France) photographs taken on navbox. Can you change your bot to reflect this? Thx and regards. --Ju Ta 07:17, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Sure, will do. Rudolphous (talk) 07:18, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

I'm trying to avoid involving this but this seems to be weird. We have our own enciklopedia but base our categories on external source. I'm not opposing this category, just a point to your consideration.

Anyway coordinates from Flickr might be confusing. They are imported automatically when using Flickr-to-Commons. Might have a lot's of mistakes. -- Geagea (talk) 11:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Опитування щодо «Вікі любить Землю» 2020 / Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Ukraine Survey

English version below

Доброго дня! Ви отримуєте це повідомлення, бо раніше брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні.

Зараз організатори конкурсу проводять опитування для учасників, аби вирішити, чи варто його проводити цього року — і якщо так, то коли. Видається, що через пандемію COVID-19 було б недоречно проводити українську частину «Вікі любить Землю» у традиційні дати, тобто протягом травня. Однак ми можемо провести його у червні або липні. Щоб визначитися, нам цікава ваша думка.

Детальніша інформація і опитування — за посиланням. Опитування буде відкрите до 14 квітня включно.

Якщо маєте питання, пишіть на wlewikimedia.org.ua. Дякуємо! --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (обговорення) 20:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi! You are getting this message because you have participated in Wiki Loves Earth in Ukraine before.

Organizers of the contest are holding a survey for participants to decide on whether to hold the contest this year — and when to do it. It seems that holding Ukrainian Wiki Loves Earth within traditional dates in May would not be reasonable because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, we can hold the contest in June or July. To decide, we need your opinion.

More info and the survey can be found by this link. The survey will be open by April 14th.

If you have any questions, contact us at wlewikimedia.org.ua. Thanks! --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (обговорення) 20:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Gaston Technical Institute Catalog and Bulletin 1960-1961 - DPLA - a9edf344cbe07ff78c9ada48812ef19b (page 41).jpg

Hi there! I saw you rotated this image when my bot overwrote the changes. It looks like the way it was uploaded is the original orientation of the work, as digitized by the library that holds it. Presumably it is a single sideways page in an otherwise portrait-oriented work, for space reasons. It would be best if you could upload a new version to change the orientation, so that the original is preserved, because if edits are made to it then the upload script will think the files are out of sync with the source and correct them. Thanks! Dominic (talk) 20:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Well Dominic, your upload script seems to be anyhow a bit buggy. You produced thousends of duplicates which I was working on. --Ju Ta 00:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

How would a duplicate file cause a rotation issue? I am not following. Can you give more explanation? Dominic (talk) 14:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

That had nothing to do with the rotation issue. I intended a better visuality by rotation them. But your bot created thousands of duplicate images though Ferbruary and March. Maybe you could relook into your code... --Ju Ta 14:14, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

I'm sorry that you've apparently been spending lots of time on this. I have never gotten a single notification about the issue, so that's kind of frustrating me as well, if you think it's a bug. I am not an admin and it seems I can't see the deleted contributions, even for my own account, so it's hard for me to look into the problem. Can you send me the list of deleted files so I can look at them? (Maybe a pastebin, since it looks like thousands.) I suspect it is not a bug in the bot, but that the repositories I am uploading might have duplicated in their collections with different names. Dominic (talk) 19:35, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, when you put

.mw-redirect

{

background-color:yellow;

}

Into your User:Dominic/common.css. You will see any redirects in yellow (or what color you choose).

Then you can check your bot logs looking for yellow entries. --Ju Ta 19:49, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

File:AKB48ドラフト会議を開催！全チームキャプテンが候補者指名選抜メンバー.jpg

File:AKB48ドラフト会議を開催！全チームキャプテンが候補者指名選抜メンバー.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions, Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images and best videos. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 09:55, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

File:A kitten n.jpg

File:A kitten n.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 09:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Eiko Ishioka.jpg

Hello there, to your 'this could be deleted' notice about Eiko_Ishioka.jpg: I really don't get it. Why is it so bad to upload low resolution picture, from her official website, whitch serves ONLY for her recognition. The same picture is on her english wikipedia webside - yes I know, the rules for english are different, but this is really bothering. What is the right aproach then? Should I write to the photograph who took this photo who lives on the other side of the world ' Hey I am nobody from Czech Republic, can I use your picture?'. Really? Do you think someboby gonna be botherd, that her officially presented picture will be used on her wikipedia page? I get the rules, but where is somme common sence. --Halfirien (talk) 15:19, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

The appraoch is to follow copyright laws. By copying from their webpage, you break to copyright of the authors. Any image on commons needs tobe reuseable for anybody in the world for any purpose (like i.e. printing and selling t-shirts or product packaging). compare Commons:Licensing. --Ju Ta 16:51, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

As I said, I get it, but it doesn't make any sense. This is robotic answer. How could anybody use low quality, small resolution picture of dead designer for making money, I really don't understand how that could be a bussiness oportunity. With music, is posible to show 15 seconds of a song without paying any fees, so why can't be use just for recognition. A small resolution picture...for just showing how someone look like without googling it. And you didn't answer my question. What is the right aproach when I want to show resemblance of Eiko Ishioka on her czech wikipage? Thak you.--Halfirien (talk) 17:19, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

When you think laws does not make sense, talk to a lawyer... And yes, you should write the auther, and ask him if he likes to publish the image under a free license o his choice - for details see Commons:OTRS. --Ju Ta 17:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Maybe I wanted a human answer, an opinion. But I understood. Goodbye--Halfirien (talk) 18:28, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Removing a picture by T. Rolke from Ukrainian page Ягода Мирослав Якович

Hi @JaTu: I've just learned about removing a picture by T. Rolke from that page: Вилучив файл Художник_Мирослав_Ягода._Фото_Tadeusz_Rolke.1990.png, оскільки він був вилучений з Wikimedia Commons користувачем JuTa. Причина: No OTRS permission since 2020-02-05. Tadeusz Rolke, the author of this picture, sent his permission to wiki on 05.02.20 (I have a copy of his mail and can forward, if required). So there is no reason to claim no permission. Please fix the mistake and restore the picture. --Yuri Git (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Yuri Git

Hi, the release was not confiirmed by an OTRS member, which is required. There are likely some open questions. You can ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for this case. regards. --Ju Ta 17:08, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks @JuTa: , will further check. --109.186.250.68 07:34, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Yuri Git

Sorry

It seems that I've uploaded many duplicates from flickr (File:SRSG Meece saluant la population de Bandera (5208591181).jpg, File:Port de Matadi (4881973373).jpg, etc...). I'm sorry about it. Thanks a lot for doing some clean up after me.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 14:53, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

You are wellcome :) But try to prevent this in future. --Ju Ta 14:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

File:UOC MP - Zhytomyr Diocese.svg

Hi! Redirecting file name "UOC MP - Ovruch Diocese.svg" to "UOC MP - Zhytomyr Diocese.svg" is wrong. This file presents Ovruch Eparchy. Roman Miller (talk) 14:59, 19 April 2020 (UTC).

Hi, I switched now the 2 files. --Ju Ta 15:03, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Saint Rampal Ji Maharaj.jpg

Hello, I learnt this through His English wikipedia Article that you deleted Saint Rampal Ji's Image. I had discussed this at the Commons:help desk that the Original Source of His Image was a Website from whom I had taken permissions to use That on wikipedia. They told me to ask the Website Managent Team to send an email regarding this to OTRS. The process is going on. It is taking a bit longer I agree. Kindly undelete The Image. It is truly not copyrighted. They would be sending an email soon to OTRS as well. Kabirisgod (talk) 17:02, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

PLease ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for this case. They will arrange the undeletion if the release is valid. --Ju Ta 21:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Шүрәле.png

Good day, I have corrected the information about File. Could you check, is it correct now? Фәрһад (talk) 17:31, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, but no. I doubt that a) the photo was made by you and b) that you have the permission to publish the depicted artwork.

Please contact the creator of the photo and artwork to send a release to the commons supportteam as documented on Commons:OTRS.

Once that has been done you indicate this by adding {{subst:OP}} to the files description page.

regards --Ju Ta 21:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Ju, the first perfomance was on March 12th 1945, the author was died in 1943. The photo was made by myself on the perfomance in Tatar opera and ballet house on March 2nd of the previous year. I can send links to prove 1) the day of first perfomance 2) the day of death of author 3) the day of 2019th year performance Фәрһад (talk) 05:28, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Hmm, I fear that Set design and costume are copyrighted too. The image has an unusual format with the white space and text around it. It has no metadata as well. I can find it in the inter i.e. on twitter, this makes me doubt your statement that you shot the image yourself. --Ju Ta 08:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Removing category

Dear Juta, you removed all category tags on my uploads. The category I created is because of a project done by researchers, students, and teachers at Leiden University together with some museums, as well as with people outside of these institutions, the crowd if you will. I created a category so our content creators can track all the commons that we use and that we add to wiki commons and data. If there is any wrong doing in this, then please explain so we can learn. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fresco Sam-Sin (talk • contribs) 19:32, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

The problem was your caterory was uncategorized. I tried to find some sensefull parent categories without success. I wondered why how do these things could "talk", so assumed some none sense edits which is unfornunatly happens often here. For the future try to find some sensefull parent categories for your new creations. Thx. --Ju Ta 20:29, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

File:ГАКО 12 3 Б.Ц.pdf

Hi Juta, I was wondering if you could help my provide the "Source of derivative work not specified since 7 April 2020"

The file in question is a list of names that appear in the census pages that were uploaded to wikipedia here:

https://uk.wikisource.org/wiki/%D0%90%D1%80%D1%85%D1%96%D0%B2%D0%B8/%D0%94%D0%90%D0%9A%D0%9E/12/3?fbclid=IwAR1cLNd1FkfoLxXfdjtlywtqZ5KZ4yMlrH8ZJnVgY6n4yG3ceQW2ProqAvM

The census pages were obtained legally from the archives in Ukraine and are part of the public domain. A user took it upon himself to type out all the names found in these pages, which are invaluable for people trying to track down their roots, and index the data.

If you have a moment please explain what needs to be done to provide the source of derivative work and I shall do so.

Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmoshev (talk • contribs) 2020-04-22T06:46:15‎ (UTC)

Well, the uploader User:Alexkrakovsky declared it as {{Own}}, which is very unlikely the case. It looked more than copied or scanned from a book. You need to find out which and if it is public domain i.e. because of age. --Ju Ta 06:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi thank you for the response. I'm sorry I'm not completely familiar with {{Own}} means. Alex Krakovsky is leading the project to scan the archives into the public domain. He has had to sue the archives in Ukraine to get access to these documents, and in each case he has won. He has raised funds to get scanners and scan the documents. He has tirelessly scanned and uploaded the revision lists for countless communities into wikipedia/wiki commons so they stay in the public domain. The work he has done for the public domain is frankly heroic. I'm assuming that the the own part of {tl|own}} means that he did the work himself? There is a very large case to be made that the transcriptions of the names found in the documents can be attributed to him.

The document in question was an index of the names found in the archive scans. Imagine you have a book of births for several villages from 1840, all written in handwritten Cyrillic from 1840. All the document in question does type out the family names available in the scans to make it easier for people who searching to find them. It is not an original work there was zero creativity in creating, the information inside is a simple transcription of the information already in the public domain. At most it has been badly attributed. From a google search I know who provided Alex with the document, with full intention that it would be publicly available. I can send you a link, but you'll need a password to the Russian Jewish genealogical forums to see the post.

In either case, it seems attributing it to Alex is fine, if not it should simply be attributed to the public domain.

Forgive me if I have not understood. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 37.142.3.160 (talk) 08:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, you mismatch the term "public domain". This does not mean published to the public, but it means free of copyright. Any image on commons needs to be published under a free license or beeing public domain - see Commons:Licensing. Either the scanned document is old enough to be public domein - this normaly means it author is dead for more than 70 years, or the author or his heirs has to confirm that he is willing to publish it under a free license of his choice. In this case he has to follow the instructions on Commons:OTRS by sending an email to the commons support team. regards. --Ju Ta 08:09, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the response. Just so we're clear, 1) Alex is the author right? 2) If yes, does he still need to send a confirmation email, isn't the act of uploading it enough? 3) If no, can I send the email on behalf? 4) If Alex is not the author, can I send the email on the author's behalf. I'm quite sure the person who made the transcription in the forum doesn't use wikipedia. I can provide a screenshot of his post in the forums. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 37.142.3.160 (talk) 09:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

1) no

2) no

3) no

4) no, the author has to send it himself. He should have an email address. --Ju Ta 15:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC)