User talk:JuTa/Archive 21

Talkback

Hello, JuTa. You have new messages at ML.HdezG's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi, I answered on our talkpage. --JuTa 17:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

DB Spinne

Guten Morgen JuTa, darf ich die Verkehrsspinne des Bayern-Böhmen-Tiket als öffentl. Verkehrsplan nach Commons Hochladen? Und welche Lizenz Attrubute muß ich dazu angeben. Gruß --Walta (talk) 06:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Walta. Ich denke das solltest Du nicht hochladen, denn der Plan besitzt Schöpfungshöhe un ist wohl auch kein Amtliches Werk. Ggf. nochmals auf de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen nachfrage, da sitze die Experten. Gruß --JuTa 08:03, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

XIX wieczna karczma w Miąsowej.jpg

Hello. I uploaded image named 'XIX wieczna karczma w Miąsowej'. I typed that author is unknown. I can't show link with author agree to use because: 1. Author is unknown(as I wrote), 2. Image is from XIX century so author is propably dead. So what we'll do?
I'm beginner on wiki commons so maybe you could tell me what to fix?
Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:XIX_wieczna_karczma_w_Mi%C4%85sowej.jpg Mercussek (talk) 17:54, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, in most countries the copyright lasts until the 70 past the dead of the author. So, even if the author is unknown he could and the image is from the late 19th century, he could be easily living past 1944 (the 70 current 70 years borderline). In your case eventualy the license {{Anonymous-EU}} could fit, if the image was intentionaly published anonymously and not just "we don't know him". regards. --JuTa 18:20, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

I fixed that. Is it well now? Mercussek (talk) 18:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, if you enter the correct date when the image was created (not 2011) and remove the problem tag at the top I will not investigate this case anymore. regards --JuTa 18:30, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

PS: The category you gave is non existent and makes no sense. if you dont know a better one please replace it with {{subst:unc}}. --JuTa 18:32, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Ok, thank you.

Re

Hello, i saw your message about the lack of enough license info: i wrote all i coud mention, i don't know wich kind of license I need. Regards, ^musaz (talk) 10:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, when you dont know a license of an image, you should not upload it on commons. In this case it could be a NASA image could be not. You should prove that by finding a source directly from NASA. If you can find that you should replace the source to that and apply the license {{PD-USGov-NASA}}. If not, the image will get deleted, I'm afraid. regards. --JuTa 10:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

It is a screenshot made by myself of a live-video constantly broadcasted (as mantioned in image's description): i think no-one will claim any copyrught issue. ^musaz (talk) 11:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. regards. --JuTa 16:40, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

I know the lack of license is a problem: I thought some license existed, so I uploaded the image, hoping someone would complete the image's description with the correct copyright label. ^musaz (talk) 00:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

License tags added

Hi,

Regarding to your message on my talk page, I added the license tags to the images. Does that solve the problem?

Thanks
Arsi Warrior (talk) 02:13, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, not realy. You didn't shot the photo. Then you cannot release it under a free license. A releasing email from its copyright holder, Turner Construction, to the commons support team would be required, see Commons:OTRS. regards. --JuTa 09:46, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Francesc Canals i Ambròs

Good night Mr. JuTa, My name is Josep and I am new in wikipedia. The picture that I have included in my article and that you say that I haven't copyrights is the same that you can see in front of the tombstone of a dead person(Francesc Canals and Ambròs)dead in 1899. It's a very small picture of only a few centimeters that it has been photographed thousands of times. In these cases where I have not taken the picture but it does not have copyright, what should I do? Thanks!

Hi, JosepRVB. I guess you talking about File:Francesc Canals i Ambrós.jpg. I rechecked the case now and corrected the file description page - see here. regards --JuTa 22:42, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Valid permissions ?

Hi, I recently saw several Yugoslavia national football team photos uploaded under a peculiar permission that I haven't seen before.

So I'd like to know if this permission (published in Serbian Wiki - see here) is valid for Commons or a OTRS ticket is required. Otherwise, those files should be nominated for deletion, shouldn't they?

The files affected are:

• File:Jugoslavia wc 1982.jpg (1982)
• File:Wc90-yugoslavia.jpg (1990)
• File:Olympic team 1960.jpg (1960)
• File:Euro 68 Final Italy Yug 2.jpg (1968)

I'll be awaiting for your reply which would make this clearer to me. Regards, - Fma12 (talk) 16:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Fma12, yes the linked page does not state any license an a google translate give only a statement that "you" have permission to use the material. Who is you? On the other hand the page is very old - maybe from pre-OTRS-Era. Best would be a regular DR to be able to discuss the case. regards. --JuTa 16:59, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

OTRS in Puig

Hello, thank you for your message. The owner of the pictures is sending to permissions-commons (a) wikimedia the emails saying that the pics are free of rights... Please, if you can be little patient, he will sent. Excuse me for my english. Cheers. --Halder321 (talk) 08:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Halder321, as soon you know the copyright holder has sent the mail to the commons support team, you shlould replace the problm tag with {{subst:OP}}. This will prevent deletion of the files for about 30 days or until the case will be decided as valid or invalid. regards. --JuTa 19:18, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Sumavska_hornatina_CZ_I1B.png

Hallo Jutta habe versucht die Datei ohne den Farbigen Hintergrund hochzuladen; aber mit dem Resultat das der hochgeladene Hintergrund wieder im Farbton #E6DAE4 auf Commons erscheint, obwohl bei mir dieser noch Weiß war, aber in der Vergrößerung wiederum nicht. Verstehe nicht was los ist. Liegt es vieleicht daran das ich Transparent anstatt Weiß genommen habe im PNG ? Oder am Commons Server Cache ? Wie lösche ich, falls mal nötig, eine von mir neu hochgeladene Version einer Datei von Commons ? Über Versionsgeschichte > Rückgängig machen funktionierte es anscheinend leider nicht. Gruß, --Walta (talk) 20:45, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Walta, stimmt in der (nur) Vollauflösung sieht man noch den farbigen Hintergund. Ich vermute auch ein Server cache Problem. Ich hab' jetzt versucht das Bild zu "purgen" und auch ein 2maliges Zurücksetzen hab' ich verucht; ohne Erfolg. Frag ggf. nochmals auf Commons:Forum oder de:Wikipedia:Grafikwerkstatt nach, denn ich bin mit meinem Latein nun auch am Ende. Gruß --JuTa 04:34, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Guten Morgen Jutta, habe nun auf deiner Empfehlung hin jemand aus dem de:Wikipedia:Grafikwerkstatt Bereich angeschrieben und ein Verweis zu dieser Diskussion hier gegeben. Bin gespannt! Habe auch die Bilddatei oben aus der Diskussion entfernt, da sich unnötigerweise ein welche Seite Benutzt die Datei Verweis auf der Bilddatei Commons Seite zu dieser Diskussion hierher gebildet hatte. Gruß --Walta (talk) 06:57, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Gertraud Kietz

Leider kapier ich das Hochladen nicht, ist für mich zu kompliziert. Es handelt sich um einen Werbeprospekt DINA 4 Seite (um 1968). Auf der Seite befindet sich kein Hinweis auf den Urheber. Der Werbeprospekt ist in meinem Besitz --Manfi.B. (talk) 05:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Manfi.B., der Prospekt ist immer noch urheberchtlich geschützt, auch wenn sich kein Hinweis darauf befindet. In den meisten Ländern (auch in Deutschland) besteht der Schutz bis 70 Jahre nach dem Tot des Urhebers, ausser explizit anders freigebeben. Urheber hier ist entweder Frau Kietz selbst, oder jemand aus dem angegebenen Verlag. Den könntest Du versuchen anzuschreiben un zu fragen wer der Urheber ist und ob dieser bereit ist dies unter einer freien Lizenz zu veöffentlichen. Details zur Vorgehensweise findest Du unter Commons:OTRS bzw. Commons:OTRS/de. Gruß --JuTa 10:29, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Animexx Logo.svg

File:Animexx Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JohnnyRidden (talk) 18:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Owner gave permission

Hi JuTa, the owner of the images (Society of Women Engineer, which I am a member) gave permission to use the photos as part of their 'Edit-A-Thon' outreach campaign to bring awareness to unrecognized pioneers. I'm not 100% sure how to convey this via Copyright Tags. I added this information to the picture: http://alltogether.swe.org/blog/swe-edit-a-thon-are-your-founders-being-found-.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragix (talk • contribs) 2014-05-19T23:15:20‎ (UTC)

Hi Dragix, on the page you linked I find nothing about the image File:JosephineWebb.jpg. This means the fotografer and/or copyright holder has to agree a a free license an has to send a releasing email to the commons support team - see Commons:OTRS. I will mark the image as "no permission" now. regards. --JuTa 20:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi JuTa, thanks for understanding. I understand there's lots of laws around copyright, etc. I'm waiting for the society to email Wikimedia with explicit permission. Dragix (talk) 21:22, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

This media may be deleted.

Доброго дня, можете пояснити як правильно розміщувати інформацію про ліцензування. Постери, що я закинув знаходяться у вільному доступі в інтернеті, тому я не знаю де знайти ліцензію. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Олексів (talk • contribs) 2014-05-20T13:56:38‎ (UTC)

Hi Олексів, we try to follow striktly copyright laws on commons. The fact that images are visible in the internet oes not mean they are free of copyright. You cant just copy images out of the web an upload them to commons. That would be a copyight violation in most cases. regards --JuTa 20:08, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Public Domain?

Hi,

I apologize about the unclear status of the picture I uploaded: File:Missouri Reserve Military Force Oath.jpg. I was unclear about the copyright status because, according to the National Guard template, any work by the United States National Guard is in the public domain, yet the Missouri National Guard was nonetheless claiming copyright status on Flickr. I was unclear if the copyright was valid or if the picture was in the public domain, and if so, if I had to acknowledge the copyright claim anyway. Therefore, I'm not sure how I should be proceeding in regards to using that picture. Please advise me on whether I can use this picture for an article or not, and if so, how I should fix it in order to ensure it is not flagged again.

Et0048 (talk) 04:14, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Et0048. According the flickr source it is a submitted foto. This means it was not made by nationalguard stuff but by somebody alse and they ust got it from a 3rd person. It looks like the foto is not in the public domain. Please don't reupload it. regards --JuTa 07:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Artek Karpaty Logo

Hi. I am trying to create the page of the International Children's Centre on behalf of owners. So they asked me to place logo on their page. How should I describe it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyvsy (talk • contribs) 2014-05-22T21:28:47‎ (UTC)

Hi, Lyvsy. If you have contact to the copyright holders you should ask them if they are willing to release that image under a free license - {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} is recomannded. If the agree they have to mail to the commons support team as describted in Commons:OTRS. regards. --JuTa 07:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, JuTa Thank for your advice! We will do that. One more question - how is that possible that Samsung Logo is not copyrighted? regards. --Lyvsy

Hi Lyvsy, that is a question of the so called Threshold of originality. This is a borderline case, but its definiltly not a textlogo, because there is no text but only grafic. If this exceeds the threshold or not differs in various countries. I'm not sure which is the country of origin in your case, but I guess it might be Russia, which is not explicitly mentioned there. You could try to reupload it with {{PD-textlogo}} and {{Trademarked}} but there is a good chance that it will be redeleted, or worst case you could be blocked here on commons an perhaps you could be pulled to court by the copyright owners because of copyright violation, not very likely but possible. To be on the save site I recommand to follow the OTRS path. regards. --JuTa 09:20, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, JuTa. I already told you that we are ready to go the long way. But I want to help you because I see that you are performing your duties well. Look what I found at Samsung site "Trademarks. "SAMSUNG", "SAMSUNG.com" and "SAMSUNG DIGITall Everyone's invited" are trademarks of SAMSUNG in the United States or other countries. Unauthorized use or duplication of these marks is strictly prohibited by law." That is why I think there is no way Samsung logo (not only text but a combination of the text with specifically shaped background) is the copyrighted logo which cannot be used according to what they wrote on their web-site. PLease remove Samsung logo - we shoulf follow the rules for all. Best regards, --Lyvsy

Hi, if you think a file should be deleted, you can raise a deletion request for it. --JuTa 15:16, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

AiGD

Hi,

Please provide me an email and I will have the author of AiGD send you an email, stating that he has given me permission to upload this to Wikipedia.--Cube b3 (talk) 08:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Cube b3, the copyright holder should send the mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org as describted on Commons:OTRS. regards --JuTa 20:24, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

License of image

Hello JuTa, this mage is update existing file: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GraphicConverter_icon.png So this is the same license.

Sincerely --Ferite (talk) 10:24, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Ferite, I'm sorry but thats so called fair use which is accepted at english wikipedia but not at commons. Compare en:Wikipedia:Fair use and Commons:Fair use. regards. --JuTa 20:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

question

i'm still fairly new to this wikipedia and updating and such, the two photos i found came from just googling the names of Bianca Del Rio, and Sharon Needles., I don't know how to make it legit and stay on the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord jafar (talk • contribs) 2014-05-28T15:45:23‎ (UTC)

Hi Lord jafar, you can't ust copy images out of the network an upload them to commons. Thats just a copyright violation. Please read Internet images. regards --JuTa 20:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

I think you’re wrong about this

About this. In 2008 this photo was uploaded with the filename File:Philadelphia & Western Railway 206.jpg, which is not risking deletion. The DR asks instead for the deletion of File:Trolley museum, Scranton,PA (201036538).jpg, a filename that existed in Commons for a mere couple days. You as admin should be able to sniff the filehistory for this file and know exactly when in May 2014 I uploaded it. -- Tuválkin ✉ 14:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Yep, you are correct. But I don't see a compelling reason to delete the redirect anyhow. It doesn't hurt, does it? --JuTa 18:34, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

File license

Hi, could you please help me determine the appropriate license for file File:Rene Maire.jpg? It was published in Algeria in 1953, but the picture was taken while the person was alive, so a few years before that. Here is the source again. Amr ibnu Kulthoum عمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 02:17, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, the templates {{PD-Algeria}} or {{PD-Algeria-photo-except}} could fit here. But be aware that the image has to be public domain in the USA too. regards. --JuTa 06:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Great, thanks. Amr ibnu Kulthoum عمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 18:51, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Badlands Unlimited company logo file

Hi JuTa,

Thanks for looking at the logo file. I've been in contact with the copyright owner, and he sent an email concerning releasing permissions for the file to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. I want to check with you that we are looking at the same file page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Badlands_Unlimited_company_logo.tif

I've uploaded this file in the past, but I did make the point of tagging it as pending permission email this time around. To avoid deletion of this file, could you advise me as to what steps I should take to get this file approved, beyond having the copyright-holder contact permissions?

This graphic is intended for an article I am currently working on. The most recent editor who declined my submission suggested I upload the company logo before resubmitting, and I hope to get that done as soon as possible. Sorry if I may be neglecting or missing rudimentary steps toward file approval on Commons, I have little to no experience with Wikipedia. Thanks!

Matthewyso (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, yes that was correct now. The template OTRS pending is preventing deletion for about 30 days. If time goes near that border you might ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for it. regards. --JuTa 21:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Bild Lizenz

Hallo JuTA, du hast mein hochgeladenes Logo als nicht ausreichend Lizenziert markiert. Könntest du mir helfen nachträglich eine passende Lizenz einzufügen? Falls es dazu eine passende Lizenz gibt... Gruß --Fossiy (talk) 06:55, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, ich fürchte da wird Dir nichts anderes bleiben, als den/die Urheberrechtsinhaber zu fragen, ob sie bereit sind das Logo unter einer freien Lizenz zu veröffentlichen ({{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} wird hier empfohlen). Falls sie einverstande sind müssten sie eine sog. Einverständisserklärung an das Commons Support Team schicken. Näheres dazu findest Du auf Commons:OTRS bzw. Commons:OTRS/de. Gruß --JuTa 07:12, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Courtesy note

Hi JuTa! I have nominated for deletion a file that you previously restored. The discussion is here, and the specific file is File:RiB-BrokenStyle.png. The concern is that it appears not to be PD-US, but was originally published in the US. I would appreciate your point of view. Best regards, Storkk (talk) 17:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

File:A sadovyy1.jpg

Hi JuTa! In fact must be 27 may [1]. And I noticed him [2]. There were a discussion on my talk page User talk:Aeou#File:A sadovyy1.jpg (in ukrainian). The file from Lviv city administration is cc-by-nc-nd 3.0. (http://city-adm.lviv.ua/copyrighted-materials). This user already uploaded in march, as I remember - the same file under similar name File:Andrew Sadovyi.jpg. And it was deleted.--Сергій (обг.) 05:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Well, he added the CC template, which is not valid, but he added it. By that reason the "no license" tag does not it anymore. I you realy desire a quicker deletion you might add the {{Copyvio}} tag. regards. --JuTa 10:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Copyright Jean Soustiel

Hello JuTa,

I saw your email, thanks you for your notification. I correct the licence by adding {self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} in the photo ; is it ok now or may the photo be still deleted ?

Anthonian

Hi, I'm sorry, but in this case Madame Soustiel has to send a releasing email to the commons support team as describted in Commons:OTRS. regards. --JuTa 11:16, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Mess in subdivision categories

There is

• Foo Bar
• Foo bar
• Bar of Foo
• Foo (Bar)

and maybe more. I saw this mess is also the case in Deutsche Wikipedia. Is that the reason you re-inforce it here in Commons? Tamawashi (talk) 23:30, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Its because all of in Category:Municipalities in Slovenia used the lower case "m". There was no mish-mash before ou only moved those with starting letter A-C. So I moved them back an we got a complete "Foo bar" again. regards. --JuTa 23:41, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

I can not do all in one click, can I? I have to start with one. But nice to see your reason is you don't like mish-mash. Tamawashi (talk) 23:43, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with departments of Bolivia! I would now move Foo (Bar), districts of East Timor. The early this all is in order, the better for all people that interact with Commons. Tamawashi (talk) 00:03, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Category redirect

The ability for normal editors to move categories only went online recently. The remove generates the #REDIRECT, so that when you go to the old cat you're sent to the new. However, this will not work with HotCat, which requires the {{Category redirect}}, which does not forward you to the new cat when you go to it, just displays a message. Until the functionality of these two are combined, both are needed. Please don't revert again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:34, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Well, the reason why its lefts out is (IMHO) if one is not empty someone clicks on an image description page he is redirected to the destination category, but the image he came from is not included. He does not see th explaining text of the template either. This will confuse a lot of (new) users. If this behaivior would be changed by a future mediawiki release, a bot has to go through all +100000 entries of Category:Category redirects anyhow, including "your" category. regards --JuTa 23:47, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't understand that response. The only was that would happen is if someone moved the cat without moving the images. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes, this happenes "often". And if someone else has added that category later to one or multiple images, which also is not unuseable. I just worked in Category:Non-empty category redirects. There were about 80 items after 1-2 weeks I worked that backlog the last time. An I just see again more than 80 Items in since I emptied it this morning. regards --JuTa 16:36, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Gute Bilder

Hallo JuTa Ich bin nun schon ein wenig länger hier auf Commons und habe schon einige Bilder hochgeladen. Was mir jedoch noch nicht ganz einleuchtet, ist wie das mit den Guten Bildern läuft. Deshalb dachte ich, ich frage einfach mal ein etwas erfahrener Benutzer. Muss ich Bilder, die ich für gut erachte, auf einer speziellen Seite vorstellen, oder kann ich die selber markieren, wenn ich das Geühl habe, sie erfüllen die Vorgaben? Ich würde sehr gerne Bilder der Kategorie Frauenfeld markieren, weis jedoch nicht recht, ob ich dazu im Stande bin und auch dazu befugt, und wäre sehr froh um Hilfe. Falls ich selber Bilder als gut markieren darf, wäre ich auch froh, wenn mir jemanden bestätigen könnte, dass die Bilder, die ich für gut halte, auch den Anforderungen entsprechen.--Sevku (talk) 13:12, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Sevku, es gibt auf Commons (so weit ich weiß) 3 verschiedene Konzepte dafür:

• Commons:Featured pictures bzw. Commons:Featured picture candidates: Dies entspricht im Deutschen den "Exzellenten" Bildern und sollten nur "die besten der besten" sein.
• Commons:Quality images bzw. Commons:Quality images candidates: Im Deutschen also "Qualitäts-Bilder". Hier sind die Anforerungen schon ein gutes Stück niedriger.
• Commons:Valued images bzw. Commons:Valued image candidates: Im Deutschen also "wertvolle Bilder". Hier wir das jeweils Beste eines Motivs ausgezeichnet.

Zu den Auswahl-Kriterien und -Prozeuren bzw. den "Mindestanforderungen" siehe die Beschreibungen auf den jeweiligen Seiten. Du kannst/solltest also nicht selbst Bilder auszeichnen, sondern auf einer der 3 Seiten vorschlagen. Ich würde vermuten dass Quality images Deinem Anliegen am ehesten entspricht. Aber nicht enttäuscht sein, falls Deine Kaniatur(en) scheitern sollten. (Ist mir vor Jahren mit einem eigenen Bild auch schon passiert.) Gruß --JuTa 17:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Asfinag strecken sondermaut 1000px.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Asfinag strecken sondermaut 1000px.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Asfinag strecken sondermaut 1000px.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

   FDMS  4    14:02, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

My Upload

The photo is older than 70 years. So, there is no need to permission to use it. Tehiptilla Vanand (talk) 19:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

OK, I modified the description page accoringly. regards. --JuTa 19:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

I added one more photo that is older than 70 years (1917). Tehiptilla Vanand (talk) 10:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Thälmann80pfgrot.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 09:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Delete or not delete?

Hallo JuTa.

Da sind heute morgen jede Menge Fotos mit mehr oder weniger anstößigem(?) Inhalt nach Category:Thailand hochgeladen worden. Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob solche Bilder überhaupt behalten werden sollen, da sie a) recht klein sind, b) alle eine gestrichelte Linie in der Mitte haben, und c) offensichtlich einen kommerziellen Charakter(?) haben.

Wie siehst Du das? Bin ich zu streng / zu konservativ? --hdamm (talk) 11:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

In der Zwischenzeit hat User:Takeaway die betr. Bilder nach Category:Pattaya Party Boat verschoben. --hdamm (talk) 16:50, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, ich hab' sie mal als "no permission" gekennzeichnet, da sie wohl nicht vom Hochlader selbst geschossen wurden. Gruß --JuTa 01:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

FYI: Als spam geloescht. Taugt nicht mal fuer die Kategorie Hostess. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

@Hedwig: Dann solttest Du auch Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pattaya Party Boat The Booze Girls 28.jpg schließen. Das hatte ich auch erst gesehen nachdem ich die Bilder als "no permission" gekennzeichnet hatte. --JuTa 02:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

 Done Oops, danke fuer den Hinweis! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo und Dank an Euch beide für die schnelle Aktion. --hdamm (talk) 07:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Music_Band

Music Band has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 14:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:地域別ウィキメディアン

Category:地域別ウィキメディアン has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 14:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Maceo Smith image

Thanks very much for reviewing the image I uploaded. I have attempted to choose the best tag to reflect the fact that the originating website for the image, an African-American history encyclopedia, specifically captioned the image "Image:Public Domain." I have selected the "PD Author" template as the best fit for these facts. My apologies--I'm still getting the hang of all the tag types, and how to employ them via the upload wizard. Respectfully, Rinnenadtrosc (talk) 05:27, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for clarifying the background an the license of the image. I see the "public domain" statement on the source website. But I don't understand why this painting of a man died 1977 should be public domain. The painting was created proparbly uring the 1960s or 70s. The painter still has the copyright in most countries. Might it be {{PD-US-no-notice}} or similar? But this has to checked and verified. But that reason I will start a regular deletion request soon. Hope you understand. regards. --JuTa 10:17, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

masud-baxtyari.jpg

یافته ام [3]سلام دوست گرامی بابت لطفتون ممنون بنده عکس مذکور رو از سایت

و منبع رو ذکر کرده ام دوست عزیز میشه کمک کنید بنده دقیقا نمی دونم چکار کنم هروخت عکسی از سایتهای دیگه رو می زنم همین مشکل پیش میاد Mogoeilor (talk) 11:28, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I'm not sure what exactly you are tying to tell me, but every image on Commons has to have a valid free license, see Commons:Licensing. regards --JuTa 16:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Deleting file

Hi, Can this file deleted: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schermafbeelding_2014-06-21_om_13.48.49.png I selected wrong rights for this picture so i wan't re-upload it.

Rico515 (talk) 17:15, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

OK,  Done. Next time please use the template {{Speedy}}. regards. --JuTa 17:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Sorry

The bot in deletion requests is not striking. I made a lot of deletion requests and added them into list not one by one, but 26 of them together. This was more convenient for me. I do not use the bot due to restrictions of my computer. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Taivo. I'm checking on a more or less daily base the content of Category:Incomplete deletion requests an completing the non complete DRs I find. This morning you were creating those while I was checking. But I regularly find items of yours within Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing subpage, thou they are complete and the subpage is existing. The reason is (I guess) that you editing manually the file pages before you creating the subpages. If it works for you I recommand you should use the AjaxQuickDelete and/or QuickDelete gadgets within your preferences - see also Help:QuickDelete. This would make the (DR)world much more easier for you (and me). If cannot use those gadgets, a null-edit to the file pages after you created the DR-subpages would kick them aout of Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing subpage. regards --JuTa 15:31, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

File:USA-POR 2014-06-16.svg

Could you rename this file for me (date should be 22 June instead of 16 June) before the match starts? I need this done as soon as possible. Davykamanzi → talk · contribs 21:31, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 21:33, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Dankeschön! Davykamanzi → talk · contribs 21:34, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Colias-Kategorien

Hi, du haste einige der neuen Colias-Kategorien erstellt. Vielen Dank dafür! Ich glaube aber es wäre aber noch sinnvoller die Unterarten in Kategorien zu der Arten zu Kategorisieren und diese dann unter Colias. Also Category:Colias alfacariensis fontainei in Category:Colias alfacariensis und das dann in Category:Colias – sonnst läuft die Colias-Kategorie über. Eine Liste der fehlenden Kategorien gibt's übrigens hier und den Hintergrund dazu im Kurier. -- Grüße, Michael F. Schönitzer 21:09, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Ja, mach das nur. Ich gah im Moment die gewünchten Kategorien durch und versuch jeweils so sinnvoll wie möglich zu katgorisieren. Von Schmetterlingen hab' ich keine besonere Ahnung. Also wenn es anders sinnvoller ist -> bitte ändern. Gruß --JuTa 21:15, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Mostafa Salameh Photo

Hello JuTa

Thank you for your comments. I went through all the pages and it got me confused what I need to use. My questing to you is: I need to upload one picture for Mostafa Salameh a Jordanian Mountaineer. The photo I used is owned by Mr. Salameh himself. So what is the easiest fastest way to get his authorization?

thanking you in advance for your kind cooperation

Ruba — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruba.atallah (talk • contribs) 2014-06-26T12:42:03‎ (UTC)

Hi, the copyright holder, which is normaly the person who took the foto, and not the "model", has to release the image under a free license ({{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} is recommanded. He has to document his release by emailing the commons support team as described in Commons:OTRS. regards. --JuTa 12:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for the prompt response, Mostafa was on to of the "Carstensz Pyramid" highest point in the Australia/Oceana continent. A team member took the photo using Mostafa's camera. Doesn't that make him the owner of the photo?

Thank you in advance Ruba Ruba.atallah (talk) 15:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

.Normaly not, no. He can try to send the mail to the OTRS team, but there is a goo chance that it will not be accepted. If he has contact to that team member he coul ask him... regards --JuTa 18:18, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

My Upload

The photo is from 1917. It is older than 70 years. No need to licence. Regards. Tehiptilla Vanand (talk) 04:10, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry every image on Commons needs a vali license. And not the photo needs to be more than 70 years old, in the most countries the photogafer needs to be more than 70 years dead, which makes a huge difference. In this case the author was [:en:Albert Kahn (banker)]]. He died in 1940, which is more than 70 years ago. I'm going to apply the correct license now. For the future please try to do so yourself. See i.e. Commons:Copyright tags for help. regards. --JuTa 07:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Duplicate deletion request

Dear JuTa, Thank you for recently posting on my user page in relation to this file. I received the same post/request a few days earlier which can be seen at the top of my user page. Should I disregard the duplication or is it necessary to respond to both? Thank you for clarifying - you can probably tell this is my first excursion into Wikimedia, so not very sure on my feet. Regards Danh108 (talk) 16:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

It was firstly marked as "no license" by another user. As there is a license template on the file description page I changed that to "no permission" an reinformed you as the uploader. The copyright holder, which is normaly the fotografer, has to release the foto under a free license - {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} is recommended - an document this by sending a mail to the commons support team as described in Commons:OTRS. regards. --JuTa 17:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Departments of Colombia

Category:Departments of Colombia - could you rename "Santander, Colombia" to "Santander Department"? Tamawashi (talk) 04:59, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Pls. just raise a {{Speedy}} deletion request with your reasons an wait what happens.... JuTa 05:04, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Inetbiz

I amended File:Liquidweb-wht-sm.jpg license. (Denver Prophit Jr.) talk 06:47, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Hmm, the statement The images on this page are available to you. is a bit short and imprecise for a vali license. Does it i.e. allow commercial reusage, like printing it on T-shirts an sell them? On the bottom you fin an opposite statemnt: Copyright © 2014 Liquid Web, Inc. All Rights Reserved.. But I think this logo doesn't exceed COM:TOO. I changed the license accoringly. regards. --JuTa 06:55, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Question about a couple of images uploaded by an editor

User:Ragdeenorc has uploaded 2 images and added them to my talk page: File:1UNDUE.PNG and File:111 edit warring.PNG - I'm guessing these aren't appropriate here? Now to go figure out what the squabble is about. Danke. Dougweller (talk) 11:23, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't realy understand what you trying to ask me. I looks like you have some touble with this user on en:, but thats shouln't be a theme here on commons.

If you asking if the licenses of those screenshots are correct. Well for File:1UNDUE.PNG there could be an incorrect authorship claimed. Who wrote the text of the article withing the screenshot? The image looks ike {{PD-old}}. For File:111 edit warring.PNG there coul be {{PD-simple}} or similar more suitable.

Or whats your question? --JuTa 11:43, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

I think my question is is it ok for users to use Commons to hold material that they wish to use in disputes or even just in general editing? Dougweller (talk) 13:12, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

You can try to raise a regular COM:Deletion request for them giving your reasons and wait how it will be decided. --JuTa 14:09, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 14:23, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Dumme Frage

File:Eduard-Mulder.jpg

Zu Eduard-Mulder.jpg. Ich hatte eingetragen das dies Werk aus dem Jahre 1898 stammt. Somit ist es älter als 100 Jahre. Ich frage mich gerade, was dagegen spricht, diese Datei einzuarbeiten? Hm hast du ein Argument dagegen? Nur mal so als ehemaliger Mentor der WP wird das eigentlich allen beigebracht, das Werke die älter als 100 Jahre sind gemeinfrei sind! Daher verstehe ich nicht ganz deine Interpretation zu der Thematik! Hm bevor du hier Einwürfe einbringst, würde ich dich gern bitten mal wirklich das Urheberrecht durchzuarbeiten. mfg Drehrumbum (talk) 22:39, 29 June 2014 (UTC) P. S. frag mal den großen Boss Jimbo ob es dir gestattet, sich über den Rechtsstandpunkt der WP hinwegzusetzen. Mir ist den dann Wurst. Ich arbeite dann einfach nicht mehr an der Thematik weiter. Damit hast du richtig was gutes für die WP gemacht!

Hallo, ich verlinke Dir mal eben die entsprechende Passage auf de: de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Pragmatische Regelung bei Bildern, die älter als 100 Jahre sind. D.h. es ist auf de: akzeptiert aber nicht auf Commons. Es gibt z.B. auch Länder in denen Bilder erst nach 100 Jahren nach dem Tod des Urhebers gemeinfrei werden. Du hattest hier schlicht gar keinen Lizenz-Baustein auf die Bildbeschreibungsseite gesetzt. Alles was Du tun musst ist also einen passenden Lizenzbaustein zu finden und auf die Dateibeschreibungsseite zu setzen. Alle möglichen Bausteine findest Du unter Commons:Copyright tags. Gruß --JuTa 02:40, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Flickr file revisited

It was the first time I used the copyvio menu; was surprised that File:Bela Bartok Square 3, Paris, France, December 2012.jpg became tagged speedy delation. Thanks for changing it into a deletion discussion. Next time I'll know.--Havang(nl) (talk) 15:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

No problem, copyvio is the most speedy deletion tag we have. Next time use directly a regular deletion request for FOP cases. regards. --JuTa 15:49, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

OTRS permisson

Hello, thank you for your warning. The OTRS permission still pending so I withdrew the edit. --Rlevente (talk) 19:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Krémer Ferenc.jpg

Kremer children despite his young age has been calculated experienced actors because they grow from birth on stage, and will come up. Francis lived from birth until Krémer theatrical medium. 1918, his father (Krémer Alexander) company of the environment and the stepfather, members of Joseph Szabadkay theater director troupe lives with actor child lives in Satu Mare, which means that during the school holidays he is up-to enter and travel with the troupe. Francis Krémer three theater seasons through 1920-1921-was, in 1921-1922, 1923-1924-was a member of the Szabadkay Joseph, and 1925-1926 in the Satu Mare theater Szendrey led by Michael. I do not quite understand that a well-known, popular actor photo into hiding until 1944, why would he? Tambo (talk) 05:09, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:Poważna

Category:Poważna has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Rsteen (talk) 12:11, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Alexandre Willame & ABB IRB1410 Image

Hello, I saw your comment concerning license prolem with the image of the ABBIRB1410 robot. I thank you for the comment, that is right, but I am disapointed that you completely ignore my answers to your past comments, and you quoted a license problem with the image although the problem is explicitely explained in the discussion page of the image. I will copy paste it, I hope you could answer me and find a solution so we can both make something good for Wikipedia. Sincerely, Alexandre.willame (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

File:ABB IRB 1410.jpg

Manipulateur ABB IRB 1410

Hello, I contacted ABB to have their authorization. I do not know what kind of autorization it is, but I have their writen agrement to use this picture.

How can I make a valid license with that? Thank you for your help, Alexandre.willame (d) 14:26, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, the copyright holders has to release the image(s) under a free license ({{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} is recommanded here). They have to document this by sending a mail to the commons support team as described in Commons:OTRS. Once you know this has been done, you better replace the problem tag with {{subst:OP}}. This will prevent deletion for about a mounth or until the case will be decided as valid or invalid. regards. --JuTa 15:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Wow. Putting this image on Wikipedia was made on my initiative after having their written agreement. I do not know how to make license and those kind of things, but I do not think such a big company as ABB will spend hours making licenses just so their images can go on Wikipedia. Is there any other way? I have their explicit written authorization. Sincerely, Alexandre.willame (talk) 13:48, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Then forward that to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org an hope it will be accepted. --JuTa 13:51, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Ok, I will do that. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Alexandre.willame (talk) 14:30, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Reggae Rajahs - ZIggy B, MoCity, Zooz, Diggy Dang, Belights.jpg

I saw that you had deleted my image, I have full permission for the image since I am the one that took it. I also made sure I didn't use an image that was used online already. It was flagged before because of incomplete copyright licence. I tried adding my licence yesterday and tried releasing the image out into the public domain. I am still new to commons and wiki, so I had left a question about it on the pictures discussion page, because I was not sure how or where to add the licence. Could you help me in getting the image un-deleted and help fulfill all the necessary parameters to keep the image up.

Hi, as it was prepublished in the net - see http://blog.findable.in/findable-in-takes-you-to-the-other-side-of-bacardi-nh7-weekender/ - we would need a verification through the so called OTRS-proceure. See Commons:OTRS. Please write an email to the commons support team from a verificable mail-address. regards. --JuTa 16:22, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Croglin.png

Ciao JuTa, Why you want to delete File:Croglin.png? It's a screendump of WikiAtlas presumed to be licensed CC-n (I don't know what version, that's probably your point). Can you please be more helpful instead of staying a deletionist? TIA,  Klaas|Z4␟V:  16:43, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, because there is currently just no license template on the file description page. For OpenSteetmaps you should normaly use {{ODbL OpenStreetMap}} and {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}}. regards. --JuTa 16:51, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Fixed, I guess  Klaas|Z4␟V:  17:16, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

HABS place cats

Hi, I note you are recategorizing some of the HABS files. Automated housekeeping on these will be quite active for a week or two yet. I have added your name as an exception to adding/changing place categories (i.e. if your account name appears in the edit history, then place categories will not be touched, though other stuff might be). If any change from this point concerns you, please drop me a note and I'll try to ensure that housekeeping behaves itself. Note that I'll be making an announcement on the Village Pump about these files when the upload looks impressive enough. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 17:33, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

I I just went through Category:Non-empty category redirects where Category:San Francisco, California appeared with 497 entries and corrected the category redirects. regards. --JuTa 17:38, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

No worries. Note that if a category redirect exists, then RussBot will pick these up, I think it does this once a day. --Fæ (talk) 17:42, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Not all of them, thats the reason I go through from time to time. --JuTa 17:44, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

File:BRA-COL 2014-07-04 QF.svg

Hi. Another file for you to rename ASAP. Just need File:BRA-COL 2014-07-04.png deleted then have the "QF" taken out of the SVG file. Thanks in advance! Davykamanzi → talk · contribs 19:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Actually it's been done already. Forget this request. Davykamanzi → talk · contribs 19:51, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:OTRS received

Hi JuTa, I will be away from 27 July till about 17 August. Could you make your bot ignore Category:OTRS received in the meantime? I will clean it up when I am back. Jcb (talk) 15:40, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Its not a bot, its all made by hand :) The only thing i do is to correct the time stamps of the otrs received templates. And sometimes I "nulledit" to too old entries, so that they fall (automacticly) into the "no permsission" categories. Or what else do you mean? --JuTa 18:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

I mean this - Jcb (talk) 19:00, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Ahh, I see. I mixed it up with the OTRS pending stuff. Yes thats OK. I'll keep my fingers on hold... :) --JuTa 23:04, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Archivio Glottologico Italiano, vol.14, 1898.djvu

So, now that you've deleted it, what can I do? G.Musso (talk) 06:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Find a more specific source than "archive.org", find a valid license template within Commons:Copyright tags an use it, name the author in the author field (and his livedates). Then a re-upload might be succesfull. regards. --JuTa 07:03, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

I've undeleted the file. I should have fixed everything, but I would be glad if you double check it. Bye --Jaqen (talk) 16:26, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Looks good. Thx a lot. --JuTa 18:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Problems with Copyright

Hi I noticed that you have deleted my formula because there was a violation of Copyrighted, I'm new in this of licenses and I would like your help. I just added some formulas with their respective link of the Government of Mexico, the author is the Banco de Mexico and this formula has a free use of their content. I hope that this link won´t have any Copyright problem. In advance thanks for the help. --Jose1901c (talk) 23:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, every image on Commons needs to use valid license templates, compare Commons:Licensing an Commons:Copyright tags. Unfortunatly you uploaded your image completely without such a license template. In your case there might be {{PD-text}} or {{PD-simple}} fitting. But there is normaly no need for such easy formula images. On wikipages you can create them with the co called TeX tags, see i.e. es:Ayuda:Uso de TeX. regards. --JuTa 07:32, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Deleting my pics

Hello! I'm a new user from Poland and I'm not very familiar with the rules, but I'm still learning and I'm very willing to contribute. I have uploaded some pics which are copyrighted and don't belong to me: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kelly_Gould-premiere_Finding_Nemo%3F_2012.jpg, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Francesca_Capaldi_Kids_Choice_Awards_2014.jpg, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kelly_Bould-premiere_Finding_Nemo%3F_2012.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kids_Choice_Awards_2012_Argentyna.png

Now I know that I shouldn't have put them. I apologise and promise never to do it again. Please delete the files above.

Regards, Olfig Kaktus (talk) 13:03, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

OK,  Done. --JuTa 07:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Cancel my modifications

Hello.<br\>I saw you've cancelled all my modifications. I've not make that to disturb Wikimedia Commons but because i've changed of "idea" about the deletions of my photos. I don't know how cancel the deletions, and a people said me i've to delete the files of the list of deletions's request. Can you please cancel the deletions's request please? Sorry for eventual mistakes, my native language is French --Lev. Anthony (talk) 16:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, you didn't deleted the deletion request pages, you emtied them. Only admins can delete pages. I noticed this and reverted those edits. Afterwards I closed those deletion request as kept as you withdrawn your request. regards --JuTa 07:39, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Follow-up

Hi, This is to follow-up on the recent and unnecessary nominations for deletion by Carriearchdale of some of my photos that I contributed. This user is currently being considered in the administrative noticeboard in Wikipedia for an indefinite block due to her/his conduct. Just wanted to let you know. Thanks, Daniellagreen (talk) 18:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I just fixed a malformed deletion request and informed you as the uploader, which the nominator normaly shoul do. regards. --JuTa 07:45, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Guten tag. I also wanted to follow-up just for your information regarding the deletion requests by the nominator that I identified above as I have made an administrative report regarding their conduct at [4]. The deletion requests appear to have been made in bad faith (though one of the images actually should be deleted) by the individual, and she has carried her conduct over here at WikiCommons, having already made a threat to me on my discussion page that things will not turn out good for me. Please note that the deletion nominator was indefinitely blocked at Wikipedia yesterday. Thank you for your consideration, Daniellagreen ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:26, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File:No Remorse Records logo.jpg

Hi, I saw that you deleted the image I uploaded yesterday (and I admit that I expected this to happend). I'm very new to Wikimedia so I don't know how to act here, the image I want to upload is the logo of a German record label disestablished in the 1990 and it's almost impossible to find any information about it, to find a way to contact the former owner to ask the permission to upload it it's even harder. It thought anyway that after 25 years from the disestablishment problably it would be free of copyright and free to be posted here, what do you think? What copyright tag should I put in this situation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sciacallo010 (talk • contribs) 2014-07-12T06:31:04‎ (UTC)

Hi I fear that there is no vali license tag for this image. Copyright expires in Germany 70 years after the death of the author. 25 years ago is far to less to assume its not copyrighted. There would be i.e. {{PD-textlogo}} but the 3D-character of the logo exceeds IMHO the so calles Commons:Threshold of originality. regards --JuTa 13:05, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:SOFIA's instruments working range.gif

Thanks for your quick response. You can delete this image immediately, because it's too sophisticated process to obtain image licence for begginer as me. I'll continue work with SOFIA's page without additional grafic information. Regards, DryominG (talk) 09:24, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

OK ,  Done. --JuTa 13:08, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Enti_Essout.ogv

Hey, thank you for your message. My problem is that the video is made by the United Nations Development Programme. I thought that there is a public license for documents made by a UN agency, isn't it ? I've checked the list but nothing. By the way, onnea finaaliin. --Helmoony (talk) 16:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, there is a template {{PD-UN}}, but this has be deprecated. On Youtube they using the Standard-Youtube-License which is not compatible with commons. I don't think there is a valid license for this video compatble with commons. regards. --JuTa 17:06, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I found the original link from Vimeo. It's a CC-BY 3.0 . Is it enough ?

Hi, yes, when you change the source and the license you can remove the problem tag too. regards. --JuTa 22:03, 12 July 2014 (UTC)