User talk:JuTa/Archive 20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:2010-oWIESNO-HABENDORF.jpg

Bonjour JuTA. Je crois que vous comprenez un peu le français. je pense avoir inclus le tag nécessaire mais je n'en suis pas sûr. Est-ce correct ? Merci --Blankenfeld (talk) 14:43, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I corrected the description field now a bit, but mainly it was OK. If ou coul find the name and livedates of the atist it would be great. regards --JuTa 07:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi JuTA, this postcard dated more 100 years. Piotr Wronski, in 2010, has added a title (1260-2010) and put rouge on the roof. regards--Blankenfeld (talk) 18:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Juta It is a agreement Copyright © 2011. Różane Wzgórze - Gospodarstwo Agroturystyczne
Envoyé : vendredi 16 août 2013 22:25
De : Piotr Wronski [1]
Envoyé : Friday, August 16, 2013 09:20 PM
Objet : Re: photo 24 et 25 du château hello no problem I greet Wroński Piotr Wzgórze http://owiesno.agro.pl--Blankenfeld (talk) 18:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not sure what you try to tell me, but if ou think the colorization and/or the "watermark" exceed the Commons:Threshold of originality, then its author Piotr Wronski should send an email to the commons support team as describted in Commons:OTRS. regards --JuTa 19:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
HiJuta I'm sorry but I do not understand ..... can you translate in French Thank --Blankenfeld (talk) 20:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, my french is worse than I thought: Here the google translation: Salut, je ne suis pas sûr de ce que vous essayez de me dire, mais si vous pensez que la colorisation et / ou le "filigrane" dépassent les commons: seuil d'originalité, alors son auteur Piotr Wronski dois envoyer un courriel à l'équipe de soutien des communes comme describted en Commons:OTRS/fr. ce qui concerne --JuTa 20:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
ok Juta, for me, these changes are not significant--Blankenfeld (talk) 21:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Fibo4me

Hallo JuTa. Du hast vor einiger Zeit User:Fibo4me ermahnt, für seine hochgeladenen Dateien einen copyright-Status anzugeben. Er hat nun wieder Dateien hochgeladen, bei denen die Quelle mMn zweifelhaft ist. Zwar sagt er überall "own work", aber mindestens bei dieser Datei passt das nicht zu dieser Webseite? Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob man das anmahnen muss? --hdamm (talk) 12:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, ich hab' jetzt 2 seiner Uploads mit no permission gekenzeichnet un ein weiteres zur Löschung vorgeschlagen. Gruß --JuTa 16:14, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Danke auch tüchtich. --hdamm (talk) 08:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Danke fürs DR vervollständigen!

— Linus (disc) 23:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

dont

hi.plz dont delete my pictures.--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 20:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I will not delete it. Another Admin will decide my request. Perhaps you shoul argument what this images makes within project scope. Are the boys anyhow notable persons? ... --JuTa 20:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
what u mean? there are many pictures of not notable prsons in here.--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 23:30, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
yes, and many of them get deleted because of that. --JuTa 03:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
i dont see deletion.--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 08:06, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Then pleas go any any daily deletion log page and search for "scope" - i.e. Commons:Deletion requests/2014/02/28 or Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/02/15 regards. --JuTa 11:14, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
are u kidding? do u mean "evey pic of not famous and not notable people"will be deleted in here? tel me waht is commons simply. I wasted my time and my money(for internet)?!--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 12:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Again: please read Commons:SCOPE. --JuTa 12:06, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
i cant read not simple english texts.--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Hmm, Commons:Project scope/fa does not realy help you. Maybe copy and paste the text to http://translate.google.de/#auto/fa/. You should be able to understand that hopefully. regards. --JuTa 12:32, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
thank u. i know google translate. i wasted my time. this site is for rich people who have best cameras and u can keep famous people photos and delete pictures of people of the East. --Sonia Sevilla (talk) 12:38, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Brooklyn Museum image

Hi JuTa. I am working to migrate the Brooklyn Museum's images from Flickr to Wikimedia Commons so they can be accessible to a much wider audience. We developed the 'no known restrictions' template for this purpose. Please reference this discussion<https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:Brooklyn_Museum-no_known_restrictions> that followed a similar deletion request. The vast majority of votes amongst the Wikimedia community were 'Keep'. We hope you allow this image to remain part of Wikimedia Commons.

Yes, but you should use a valid license template during upload. thx and regards. --JuTa 19:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Deletion requests/File:AG-Herznach-Beinhaus-Kirche-Pfarrhaus.jpg: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Danke für's Korrigieren. Ich stelle so selten Löschanträge, dass ich irgendwie immer was falsch mache :( --Badener (talk) 08:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Aber immer gern doch :) --JuTa 11:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Regarding the Aksel Larsen image...

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aksel_Larsen_c_1959.png

I believe it has the right copyright, since it was cropped off this one and that has the right copyright. Could you remove the deletion tag, please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Byzantium Purple (talk • contribs) 2014-03-01T12:55:01‎ (UTC)

Hi, I'm sorry, but fair use is not allowed on commons. The licnse tag you added was a fair use tag and redirects to a speedy deletion tag here on commons. Compare Commons:Fair use an en:Wikipedia:Fair use. If you need this in another local project you should ask there if fair use is allowed and in yes copy it over to that proect localy. regards. --JuTa 20:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Restore photos

Can you restore these photos? The Flickr user already the license and we can upload the photos.

Regards and thanks. --Vivaelcelta {talk  · contributions} 16:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

foto 2012- lancier Düsseldorf.jpg

Hallo Juta Können Sie löschen danke 2012- lancier Düsseldorf.jpg (fichier)--Blankenfeld (talk) 21:20, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Tank Carder

Hi, I added the 'self' tag to the BMX picture. I wanted to make sure I did it right. Also, I need to inquire about what to do with the other pictures if they are in danger of being deleted. I got them off his google pics on the internet. Thanks for your help Mmcard59 (talk) 03:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Re: Copyright status: File:Gottlieb logo.jpeg

Added {{Pd-textlogo}} and {{Trademark}}. Thanks for remember them, I almost forgot. Amitie 10g (talk) 20:25, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Re: Copyright status: File:Old Timey Photo Club.jpg

Hi, thank you for informing me of the upload procedures. I would like you to delete this image (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Old_Timey_Photo_Club.jpg) as I do not think I have the proper license, nor the means to acquiring the proper permission. ---Drywater2k (talk) 13:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

OK, ✓ Done. --JuTa 08:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status

Good day, Ju! I've addressed the requests to specify the status of the images uploaded recently: as for the three of these

a letter by the copyright holder, Giuseppe Scozzi, with appropriate explainations and permissions has been forwarded to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Hope the team will be able to revise it. As for the Unframe logo file

I,ve added the approprite tags to this one: Trademark and PD-textlogo. In case this is not sufficient, a letter by Ricardo Budini, the copyright holder for the logo, will also be forwarded to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org shortly. Thank you kindly in advanse. Mstyslav Chernov (talk) 09:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Mstyslav, the license for the last image looks OK to me now. I removed the problem tag. For the first 3 you have to wait for the "outcome" of the support team. regards. --JuTa 09:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


Copyright status File:Magnin titelpag

Hi JuTa,

Thx for informing me on cr status File:Magnin titelpag.jpeg. The image was retrieved from a publication year 1835. I thought for items older than 70 years no copyright issues involved. Nevertheless, I am not going to use the file, so it can be deleted. Greets GuppieB52 (talk) 11:56, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Hallo JuTa! Die Mail mit der Bestätigung kam, zusammen mit dem Bild direkt von Yohan Goutt Goncalves am 7. Januar (ich habe die Mail aus meinem Archiv gerade nochmals an permission geschickt). Später gab es noch eine Rückfrage, wer der Fotograf ist, Goutt antwortete daraufhin, dass seine Mutter das Bild gemacht hat. Danach gab es keine Rückfragen mehr. Müsste ja alles eigentlich im Posteingang bei Euch drin sein. Derzeit ist Goutt in Osttimor zur Feier seiner Fahrt beiden Olympischen Spielen und eher schlecht erreichbar. Ich hoffe, dass daher der eMail-Wechsel auffindbar ist. Schönen Gruß, --Patrick (talk) 15:11, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, kannst Du das nochmals auf Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard posten. Ich bin kein Mitglied des Supportteams und kann diese Mails nicht einsehen. Ich hatte nur versucht einen alten "Backlog" aufzuräumen. Gruß --JuTa 18:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Ist geschehen. Irgendetwas muss da schief gelaufen sein. --Patrick (talk) 21:10, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Boris Vian

Je viens d'envoyer un courrier à la cohérie Boris vian contact@borisvian.org qui m'avait envoyé cette photo issue des archives Boris Vian, prise par un Photomaton. Que vous faut-il de plus exactement. J'ai du mal à vous comprendre.--[[Lepetitlord]] ([[Discussion utilisateur|d]]) (talk) 18:49, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, could you please post this again to Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. I'm not a member of the commons support team, I just tried to clean up and old backlog. regards --JuTa 18:53, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
J'ai déjà redirigé le mail de la cohérie Boris Vian accordant le droit pour cette photographie avec la photo en pièce attachée. À qui puis-je rediriger ce message et à quelle adresse? Merci d'avance.--[[Lepetitlord]] ([[Discussion utilisateur|d]]) (talk) 21:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
please send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org as describted in Commons:OTRS (Commons:OTRS/fr). --JuTa 21:09, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

How to find Creative common images

I tried to use a .edu source, but you deleted it. How do I find an open source image?EternamenteAprendiz (talk) 12:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, the main prolem is that you didn't provided any license for those images. The source pages don't indicate any license either, which makes them "all rights reserved" per default. You could use i.e. advanced google image search for searching for free images. an exmpample: important choose "free to use or share, even commercially" for the option "usage rights" near th bottom. regards. --JuTa 20:10, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Schau mal kurz in mein Kommentar. Du kennst Dich ja mit URAA besser aus als ich; ob es nun greift oder nicht. Merci Wassermann 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MediaWiki message delivery (talk • contribs) 2014-02-22T19:23:17‎ (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, JuTa. You have new messages at Emmette Hernandez Coleman's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk • contribs) 2014-02-23T21:10:54‎ (UTC)

No entiendo que falta para borrar la imagen

Sobre esta imagen. No comprendo que falta para poder borrarla. Es una mala copia de un original de Antonio Moro. --Parair (talk) 21:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, you started an (incomplete) regular deletion request which I completed. Those requests ae normally running for a week before they get decided by an admin. Please just be patient. --JuTa 21:46, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
No lo entiendo. Por favor en castellano. Yo creo que está claro doy mis razones. Y el perjuicio es para otras wikipedias, en otros idiomas, que enlazan a una información falsa. Gracias --Parair (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I on't speak any castellano. Here a google translate tospanish of my first post:
Hola, usted comenzó un (incompleto) solicitar la eliminación regular que completé. Dichas solicitudes se ejecutan normalmente por una semana antes de que se decidieron por un administrador. Por favor, sea paciente. --JuTa 20:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Ya le entiendo. Al final he decidido ser más rápido y solucionarlo yo mismo. Gracias por su trabajo. Un saludo. --Parair (talk) 19:12, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Encontré la imagen auténtica del 1er duque de Alba. I look for real retreat 1st Duke of Alba, ok? --Parair (talk) 19:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status of File:Kilnadeema Leitrim crest.jpg and File:Tommy Larkin's crest.jpg

Hi JuTa,

I think I've addressed the issues around File:Kilnadeema Leitrim crest.jpg and File:Tommy Larkin's crest.jpg now. Please let me know if they are not ok

Seaninryan (talk) 20:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

.Hi, I dont think the {{PD-textlogo}} applies here. They are far to complex for that. By that reason I will now start regular deletion requests for them. regards. --JuTa 20:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Covers of books that I've uploaded

Hi JuTa

I don't know what is the problem, but I've uploaded the covers of the books, because there wasn't any yet and they are awesome Portuguese Books that I believe that deserve more information in Wikipedia. I don't understand why you've blocked it, but if you are going to continue, I give up. I uploaded the cover image just to add some more information about the books, but if you want to block the image go ahead, I just don't understand what's the gain for you.

Best regards, Tiago Duarte, a proud portuguese reader — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiagoduarte14 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-13T23:27:52‎ (UTC)

Hi, you simply break the copyright of the authors of the books and/or the designers of the book covers. Because you own a copy of those book, you dont own the copyright of them. You cannot release images of them under a free license (which includes commercial reuseage for everybody in the world btw.). The only chance I see that you contact the authors or their publishing houses an ask if they are willing to publish those images under a free license of their choise ({{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} is recommanded). If they agree they have to send an email to the commons support team as liste in Commons:OTRS. regards. --JuTa 08:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

photo Рустам Штар

Dear, JuTa! I received this letter from author of the picture of Rustam Shtar. I reposted his letter to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org what can I do more now to prevent deliting of this picture?


"Настоящим я заявляю, что являюсь автором и/или единственным обладателем исключительных авторских прав на произведение [ https://onedrive.live.com/?cid=08708f798eda2c4c&id=8708F798EDA2C4C!243&Bsrc=Share&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&authkey=!Am1sgSpeOXtkO6c (или иным образом укажите его местонахождение)]

Я согласен опубликовать это произведение на условиях свободной лицензии [ CC Attribution ].

Я понимаю, что тем самым даю право любому лицу распространять, изменять и использовать произведение в любых законных целях (в том числе связанных с извлечением коммерческой выгоды) при условии соблюдения указанных лицензий.

Я осознаю, что такое использование может не ограничиваться проектами Викимедиа и связанными с ними сайтами, и разрешаю это.

Я уведомлён, что я сохраняю исключительные авторские права на это произведение вне условий указанных лицензий и что я всегда сохраняю право на упоминание меня как автора в соответствии с выбранными лицензиями. Модификации, которые сделают другие люди, не будут приписаны мне.

Данное разрешение затрагивает только мои исключительные авторские права, и я оставляю за собой право предпринимать действия против использования моей работы с нарушением закона — в частности, для клеветы, унижения чести и достоинства, нарушения правил использования торговых марок, нарушения права на охрану изображения гражданина и т. д.

Я понимаю, что я не могу отозвать данное разрешение и что моя работа может размещаться в проектах Фонда Викимедиа в течение неограниченного времени либо быть удалённой оттуда.

[ 10 марта 2014 года. Аслан Ахмадов ]ASLAN AHMADOV <12027300@inbox.ru> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Лернер Геннадий Фимович (talk • contribs) 2014-03-15T21:58:55‎ (UTC)

Hi, the only things you or I can do are:
  • set the {{OTRS pending}} template which prevents deletion for about 30 days or until the case will be decided as valid or invalid by a member of the commons support team.
  • apply the license given by the copyight holder(s) as noted by you above.
Both things I now did. All we can do now is wait until the case will be decided. And please be patient, as the is often a large backlog an it could take even weeks. regards. --JuTa 08:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

JuTa, you've got to help me! File:Guest and Kunta Kinte sculpture.jpg - I am not sure what you want me to do to keep the file here. I know it is okay to use as I did obtain the okay of the owner of these works - The Gambia Newspaper. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AENLLc (talk • contribs) 2014-03-15T22:11:06‎ (UTC)

Hi, if not yet one the copyright holders should send an releasing mail to th commons support team as describted in Commons:OTRS. In the hope this has been done or will be done shortly I now set the template {{OTRS pending}} which will prevent the deletion for about 30 days or until the case will be decided as valid or invalid. regards. --JuTa 08:25, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

I need help

Wiki-help
Hi JuTa.

I do not understand what to do with photos https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grand-corps-malade_(1).jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grand_%D0%A1orps_Malade.jpg

I copied them on the internet for articles: Grand Corps Malade https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80:Grand_Corps_Malade

How to fill in licensing? When check out the article? If there is no license for photos, how to remove them and put those things in commons.wikimedia.org?

I wanted to write my first article in Russian, ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Corps_Malade ) but I have nothing. Etokarenko (talk) 08:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I think you simply break the copyrights of the original authors uploading those images to commons. You didn't shot these images yourself, so you cannot publish them under a free license. If you have contact to the original author(s) you can try to ask them if the are willing to publish them under a free license of their choice ({{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} is recommanded). If they agree thy have to send an email to the commons support team as describted in Commons:OTRS. PS: Another admin deleted the images inbetween as copyright violations. regards --JuTa 20:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Imagem Botafogoec.gif

Olá JuTa

Agradeço pela orientação, mas ainda tenho dificuldades em anexar a imagem ao projeto https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botafogo_Esporte_Clube_(Tr%C3%AAs_de_Maio). É de extrema importância para compreensão de qual clube exatamente é apresentado. Lhe peço ajuda. Atenciosamente Alexandreclassmann (talk) 20:58, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thats some months ago, but anyhow: the main problem was that there was just no license template on the description page. As it is a very simple image you might reupload it with i.e. {{PD-simple}}. But I cant guarantee that someone else could raise a deletion request for it. regards. --JuTa 21:06, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
obrigado pela orientação. preciso de ajuda para publicar a imagem. Se puder me ajudar. A imagem está aqui http://amadorbotafogotm.blogspot.com.br/p/o-clube.html

O clube é amador. Faço parte da diretoria. Não é necessário direitos autorais, pois não se sabe quem criou a imagem. Estou com dificuldade em compreender como devo adicioná-la. Alexandreclassmann (talk) 15:35, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, for me the easiest way to upload files is through https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload. You fill out all reuired field and at the "Licensing" near the bottom you choose "Too simple to be copyrighted" in this case. regards. --JuTa 18:34, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Fotos noch nicht mit Lizenz verlinkt

Hallo JuTa! Vor drei Wochen habe ich etliche Fotos für meine Kirchenartikel hochgeladen und die Künstler bzw. deren Erben haben die entsprechenden Lizenzen bei Commons abgegeben. Leider sind diese Fotos noch nicht mit den Lizenzerklärungen verbunden. Könntest du mir bitte helfen, damit die Fotos nicht automatisch gelöscht werden? Darf ich dir die entsprechenden Fotos angeben? Danke für deine Hilfe und mit herzlichem Gruss! --Charly Bernasconi (talk) 16:37, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Charly,ich bin mir nicht sicher um welche Bilder es geht, aber am besten fragst Du auf Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard nochmals unter Nennung der Dateinamen nach. Ich bin kein Mitglied des OTRS-Teams und kann somit die dorthin geschickten mails nicht einsehen. Gruß --JuTa 18:19, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Hallo JuTa, danke für die Angabe, ich werde mich dort melden und hoffe, dass mir bald jemand helfen kann. Lieber Gruss --Charly Bernasconi (talk) 20:15, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright: Stampylonghead File

Hi, it seems that you are going to delete my upload of Stampylonghead Skin(https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stampylonghead_skin.jpg". I had found it on a wikia. I read through the User conduct and found this line. "Not to upload, post, email, transmit or otherwise make available any content that infringes any patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright or other proprietary rights of any party;" So I'm guessing this means that whatever posted on a wikia page, I have the license to use. So if I am correct (I may not be because I don't understand copyright fully), could you please not delete my upload, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheQ Editor (talk • contribs) 2014-03-19T22:13:15‎ (UTC)

Hi, yes. But that means only that wikia users uploading files to wikia should not break any other party copyrights. It does not mean that they pulish thir own work under a commons compatible license (see Commons:Licensing). You should try to contact the copyright holder, probarbly TheQ Editor, an ask him if he is willing to publish this image under a free license ({{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} is recommanded). If he agrees he has to send a releasing mail to the commons support team as describted in Commons:OTRS. regards --JuTa 06:50, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Wikia has the same disclaimer about releasing content under a suitable free license as WMF projects. Rich Farmbrough, 20:59 11 April 2014 (GMT).

Colonel Bogey

File:ColonelBogey.ogg It's a PD file, look source: Internet Archive. Thanks! OsvátA

OK I changed the license to {{PD-USGov-Military}}. regards --JuTa 06:41, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

This is a note to let you know that I've reopened a deletion discussion that you closed previously: Commons:Deletion requests/Template:NGruev. Cheers, -- TLSuda (talk) 21:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Thx. --JuTa 06:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Me ayudas?

Hola,te acuerdas de mi,pues te acuerdas de File:Mrfusion.jpg?,bueno,la verdad quiero que me digas como hago para que el propietario de la imagen me de el permiso para publicarlo pues solo tengo 7 dias antes de que lo borren y como soy nuevo aqui,no entiendo mucho de wikimedia. Electrosan10 (talk) 23:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, this is a borderline case. You might try to use {{PD-textlogo}} and {{Trademarked}} for this image. But this will not prevent anyody to raise a reduglar deletion request for it because it might exceed the so called threshold of originality. The better way is to ask the copyright holder if he is willing to publish this under a free license ({{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} is recomannded). If he agrees he has to send a releasing mail to the Commons support team as describted in Commons:OTRS. In this case you better put {{OTRS pending}} onto the description page, which will prevent deletion for about 30 days or until the case will be decided as valid or invalid. regards --JuTa 06:36, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Dices que debo poner en la discusion del propetario de File:Mrfusion.jpg la plantilla ({{Cc-by-sa-3.0}},con mi nombre en la parte "atribución" o el nombre del archivo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Electrosan10 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-26T22:27:54‎ (UTC)

As I speakno spanish I'm not sure what you try to ask here. I post a google translate of my last post:
Hola, esto es un caso límite. Usted puede tratar de utilizar {{PD-textlogo}} y {{Trademarked}} para esta imagen. Pero esto no impedirá anyody plantear una solicitud de eliminación reduglar para ello, ya que podría exceder la llamada umbral de originalidad. La mejor manera es preguntar al titular del derecho de autor, si él está dispuesto a publicar esta bajo una licencia libre ({{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} se recomannded). Si él está de acuerdo en que tiene que enviar un correo liberar al equipo de soporte Comunes como describted en Commons: OTRS. En este caso es mejor poner {{OTRS pending}} en la página de descripción, lo que evitará la eliminación de alrededor de 30 días o hasta que el caso se decidirá como válido o no válido. saludos
O usted pide otra vez en español en Commons:Café --JuTa 22:34, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

You say that I put in the discussion of Own File:Mrfusion.jpg ({{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}, with my name in the "attribution" or the name of the file? Electrosan10 (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

No, I say that you should ask the copyright holder if he likes to publish this image under a free license. If he agrees he has to send an email to the commons support team - see Commons:OTRS. If you still not understand please try to ask again in spanish on Commons:Café. regards. --JuTa 22:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Иларион (Троекуровский)

Why delete a file? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artem Bessonov 1980 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-26T17:22:58‎ (UTC)

Hi, I guess you talking about File:Иларион Троекуровский.jpg. In general you can't just copy files from the internet and upload them to commons declaring them as your own work. Mostly they are copyrighted and you breaking law doing so. Please read Commons:Licensing and or Commons:Licensing/ru. In this one case you missed to provide any license template. In most coutries for such painting the artist has to be dead for more than 70 years to make a paining public domain. In this case ou have to provide a comprehensible source and use i.e. {{PD-art|PD-old-70}}. regards. --JuTa 18:31, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear JuTa,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Delete

@JuTa: go ahead and delete [File:UpToMyXInAlligators_Image.jpg], and while you're at it, will you also delete the following duplicate: [wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/archive/6/61/20140331142039%21Early_Morning_Glacier_Bay_Alaska.jpg] Thx in advance. Atsme (talk) 16:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, another admin allready deleted the first file an the second one i cannot find. --JuTa 21:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

copyright

Hello! I uploaded an image. Before I did it I ask for permission to the right person. It's a picture of 1€ct from European Central Bank's web. I wrote an e-mail to the person in charge of coins and bills images and he answered that those images could be uploaded to wikimedia commons and wikipedia for informative purposes. I don't know where to obtain information about copyright or what do you want me to write in the copyright line in the image table... Can you explain me? I really believe that articles about euros have encyclopedic importance and they MUST have images and the ECB gave me that permission... --Philloven (talk) 03:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, the main problem is that you used just no license template when uploading this image - compare Commons:Licensing and Commons:Copyright tags. The second problem that the "Backsides" of Euro coins are copyrighted by th national law of its country - compare Commons:EURO. I you got a written permission you should forward that to the commons support team as describted in Commons:OTRS, but be aware that only for informative purposes is normaly not enough it must be possile for anybody in the worl to reuse that image for any purpose (incl. commercial purposes as i.e. print an sell t-shirts with it). regards --JuTa 08:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Secretary-general file

I want to delete it but i dont know how lol. so please delete the files i uploaded. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saveriachoi (talk • contribs) 2014-04-06T10:03:32‎ (UTC)

OK, ✓ Done deleted all 4 images. regards --JuTa 10:10, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Leipziger Verkehrsbetriebe 30.10.2009 netzplan.jpg

Excuse me. This is my first time to upload picture onto WikiCommons. I found the picture on a website here providing a network picture. It is clear that this website did not create this picture as I know that LVB company gave out this network plan and this website used it afterwards. I'm not certain about how to license the file I uploaded. LVB allow its network plan downloaded at its website, so this file are supposed to be created by LVB. Is there any improper deeds of me? I think there's something to be desired, especially the licensing.--辛庚己戊 (talk) 13:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hello 辛庚己戊. As I have just tagged this file for speedy deletion let me explain this to you. Please note that free licencences for any sort of media can only be granted by the creator of the file. So, as you rightly observed, this image of a network plan was created by LVB and not by you. The fact that some website offers these plans for download does not at all mean that they waive any sort of copyright. Therefore you as the uploader cannot simply make up a licence and claim that the file is in the public domain. Moreover, the source page http://www.city-cover.com/ is a commercial platform that does not allow any content to be copied and uploaded elsewhere. That said, your uploading this file at Wikimedia Commons was a clear infringement of copyright. Next time you would like to upload files from the internet please be sure that the source website has explicitely granted a free licence for all of its content. Please mind also that phrases like "free of charge" do not equal "free of copyright" or "free to use". De728631 (talk) 14:03, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Ju Ta, I copied & pasted the below message you sent as I'm not familiar with protocol for Wiki. We are trying to help expand the Stevie "Keys" Roseman page however it seems difficult to make any sort of progress with random editors making decisions. Evidently the picture we wanted to upload is copyrighted which is fine and the owner has now been contacted for it's release. In the meantime someone else has marked the entire reference for speedy deletion even though his page is a valid one. In addition to the pending photo there is relevant content that should be there however we need help with this process. Are you willing to assist expanding this page if we provide this content? It shouldn't take very much effort and would be much appreciated if you removed the deletion tag. This artist has worked with some of the great musical acts and is associated with the rock band Journey. Thanks so much in advance. (Jets23615 (talk) 17:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC))


Thanks for uploading File:Stevie "Keys" Roseman.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Hi, the image you are talking about was uploaded and deleted more than a month ago now. But anyhow, you stated the source as "internet" and the author as "B". Most internet images are copyighted and you can't just upload them to commons releasing them under a free license (which is required here - see Commons:Licensing). I you now contacted the copyight holder an he is willing to publish this image under a free license, he should send a releasing email to the commons support team as describted on Commons:OTRS. Once the support team staff has checked that release an foun it OK they will undelete the image. (I'm not a member of that team). You can ask for progress of your case on Commons:OTRS noticeboard. regards. --JuTa 19:51, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Imagen

Hola, yo soy el autor de la imagen https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Busto_de_Julio_C%C3%A9sar_Ayala_-_Amor,_comprensi%C3%B3n_y_ternura.jpg y acabé de reenviar el permiso, espero lo revisen lo más pronto porque al parecer nunca revisaron el e-mail que les envié.--LocoWiki (talk) 03:24, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, you could ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard whats wrong with this case. I guess its because you have shot the photo but you are not the creator of the bust, which is copyighted too. regards. --JuTa 18:50, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

re this photo

Re this, it is part of the British Library series that is already in the Commons, uploaded by British Wikipedians; this is a trim of a larger image there; I thought I had adequately referred to the source image in the template given; this file should not be deleted.Skookum1 (talk) 05:50, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, it was firstly deleted because you forgot to use any vali license template. After you reuploaded it with a valid license tag I don't think there is any risk that it will be deleted again. regards. --JuTa 18:53, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Re: Copyright status: File:Father Leonardus Miau.jpg

Yeah, that's ok :) . Okkisafire (talk) 09:27, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

OK then. --JuTa 18:55, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Copyright: Borderline, the band, photo upload

Hello JuTa. Thank you for your message. My apols, I am somewhat new at this. It seems you are going to delete the photograph of Borderline, the band, that I uploaded yesterday. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Borderline1974.jpg) I would prefer that you not delete it because it was just a matter of me improperly formatting this photo. Basically, this is a 1973 publicity photo of the band, distributed by the record company, and I believe this photo is covered under the "fair use" principle of Wikipedia publicity photos. If you would like, I can email you a scan of the original publicity photo, front and back, with "Nov. 21, 1973" stamped on the back and the record company name printed at the bottom of the front. I would appreciate if you, or some other Wikipedia editor, could please give me specific instructions on how to resubmit the upload of this photo so that it satisfies everyone that we are not in violation of anyone's copyright. Please give me specific instructions on what to say in my copyright tag, and what to list as my "source." And again, I can email you a scan of the original publicity shot, if that helps. Thank you.

--Mlewis61 (talk) 21:10, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, pleas reupload the image to the nglish wikipedia, because fair use is not accepted on commons - compare Commons:Fair use an en:Wikipedia:Fair use. regads. --JuTa 17:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Constant le Marin

Hello. I didn't find the proper licence but this image is in the public domaine, as it is mentionned on the Gallica (BNF) website :

Notice complète
Titre : Constant le Marin en soldat belge : [photographie de presse] / Agence Meurisse
Auteur : Agence de presse Meurisse. Agence photographique Ne voir que les résultats de cet auteur
Éditeur : diff. par l'Agence Meurisse (Paris)
Date d'édition : 1915
Sujet : Constant le Marin (1884-1965) -- Portraits Relancer la recherche sur ce sujet
Type : image fixe,photographie
Langue : Français
Format : 1 photogr. nég. sur verre ; 13 x 18 cm (sup.) ou moins
Format : image/jpeg
=> Droits : domaine public <=
Identifiant : ark:/12148/btv1b90421894
Identifiant : Numéro commercial : Meurisse 56353
Source : Bibliothèque nationale de France, département Estampes et photographie, EI-13 (2542)
Relation : Notice de recueil : http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb40499419q
Relation : Appartient à : [Recueil. Actualités 1914-11-20**1915-10-14. Agence Meurisse MEU 55846-58419]
Relation : http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb415720968
Description : Ancien détenteur : Agence de presse Meurisse
Description : Référence bibliographique : Meurisse, 56353

I hope you may help to provide the good license model for this picture. Thank you/merci, Mogador (talk) 07:34, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, in this case the template {{Anonymous-EU}} could fit. regads. --JuTa 17:45, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
I've fixed it. Thank you for your help. Mogador (talk) 16:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

About File:Fsk bblogo a.png

Delete file please, I make mistake since I have misunderstand Wikipedia have make some changes.

Powderguy (talk) 09:50, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

OK, ✓ Done --JuTa 10:58, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Multiple language versions of same image

Hi, I noticed your edits here and here. I'm not sure why you deleted those subpages, but is there a common way in which the description and other versions can be centrally managed? Thayts (talk) 19:37, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Well you could create a template like one of those or you could directly use the template {{Other versions}}. regads. --JuTa 19:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
And for the description part look at this listto get some ideas. --JuTa 19:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

FIle Copyright

Hello dear JuTa

I've seen your message and understand the situation. However I want to explan myself in order to obtain help. My family owns a letter, it was wriiten by Porfirio Diaza Mexican dictator that died almost 100 years ago. We wanted to share the histroy by adding our great grandfathers Plutarco Montiel history to Wikipedia, besides we wanted to share the letter that Porfirio Diaz wrote to him while he was president. I'm new to this and would love to share the media, however what copyright status should I use? I think it can be considererd public domain already. The letter was written in 1888 date that you can clearly see on the letter.

Is {{PD-US}} ok? or should I use another tag? how can I preven't my file from being deleted.

Thank you for your help.

Paolo Luciano — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paolo Luciano (talk • contribs) 2014-04-20T01:25:09‎ (UTC)

Hi Paolo, the {{PD-US}} is not realy OK, because thats not an US work but a Mexican work. I've changed it to {{PD-old-auto-1923}}. I think thats fitting here altough Mexico has a 100 pma rule - compare Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico. Quote: There is one exception: works that were already in the public domain before July 23, 2003. Generally speaking, that means works created by someone who had died before 1952 are in the public domain (30 years before the non-retroactive extension to 50pma was implemented on 12. Januar 1982; the extensions to 75pma on January 1, 1994 and 100pma in 2003 were also not retroactive). regards. --JuTa 06:49, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Incomplete Nominations for Deletion

Hi,

Thanks for notifying me of the nomination for deletion (that the nominating user User:SpiderMum failed to do so).

I notice that you didn't say anything to them, so I've left a comment on their page regarding the matter. (Strictly speaking I'm not sure if I had to be notified- I wasn't the original uploader for any of the images- but the original uploader should have been notified by them).

Once again, thanks! Ubcule (talk) 20:28, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I regularly check the content of the subcategories of Category:Incomplete deletion requests and complete them where needed. There are several a day. Only if I find a very lot created frequently by one user I try to talk to him like you did now with SpiderMum. regards. --JuTa 20:32, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Image incorrectly identified

Hi JuTa - the following image is incorrectly identified as a shortnose sturgeon when in fact it is a lake sturgeon. What is the process for correcting it? [2] Thank you in advance. (Not sure why my signature shows up in code here in Commons, so I have to manually sign in). 22 Apr 2014 9:30 User:Atsme

Hi, I saw you requested a rename which was declined. Well, the external source http://digitalmedia.fws.gov/cdm/singleitem/collection/natdiglib/id/3163/rec/1 suggests this is indead a shortnose sturgeon. The image is used in many projects for this species. If you are sure that your identification is correct you couldtry to ask i.e. on Commons:Help desk for other opinions. A good (german) help page I know is de:Wikipedia:Redaktion Biologie/Bestimmung. I myself have no clue to which exact species this fish might belong, but the exetrnal source and the wiki-usage of it indicates its currently correctly identified. regards. --JuTa 16:38, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Permiso OTRS

Hola JuTa. Se ha enviado el permiso el 22 de abril de 2014. [Ticket#2014031410014481] Liberación de la Obra: Orden Martinista, bajo la licencia CC BY SA- 3.0. Un saludo --Deucaleon (talk) 22:01, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Deucaleon, about which image(s) you are talking about? --JuTa 22:05, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I see: its File:Orden Martinista 2.jpg. Well the permission was not confirmed by OTRS staff since 14.03. Please ask again on Commons:OTRS noticeboard because I'm not a member of the OTRS group. I'm just an admin looking after some old backlogs. regards. --JuTa 22:10, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Ramana Maharshi

Hi JuTa,

I added the Indian copyright tag to three of the four Ramana Maharshi photos. Is that okay? Please have a look:


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sri_Ramana_Maharshi_-_Lying_-_G._G_Welling_-_1948.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sri_Ramana_Maharshi_-_Portrait_-_G._G_Welling_-_1948.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sri_Ramana_Maharshi_-_Sitting_-_G._G_Welling_-_1948.jpg


I don't know of a tag I can add to the Ramana Maharhsi stamp unfortunately:


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sri_Ramana_Maharshi_%28Mystic%29_-_Commemorative_Postal_Stamp_-_1971.jpg#.7B.7Bint:filedesc.7D.7D


Best,

MerlynDanielMali

Hi, for the first 3 I now removed the problem tag. For the last one, I dont see a real chance - compare Commons:Stamps#India. regards --JuTa 20:47, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Brilliant! Thanks. Does that mean they have been accepted and I can use them in articles?

Merlyn

yes. --JuTa 06:29, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Vielen Dank fürs Nacharbeiten zum x-ten Mal

Nabend - ich fasse es nicht - ich lerne es nicht. Und du musst immer wieder hinter mir her kehren. Wie kann ich das wieder gut machen? --Maxxl2 - talk 21:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

smile; in dem Du es in Zukunft besser machst :) --JuTa 21:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Ich versuche es - noch aufmerksamer. Ehrlich. --Maxxl2 - talk 22:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi JuTa,

I would like to mention that two logos of universities are kind of public property, because it's license is not clear. If university authorities are aware about it they would certainly release it as creative commons.

If it is objectionable let me know what to do, do I seek right from university authority?

Rajbhatt (talk) 15:54, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, a representaive of the university has to send a releasing email to the commons support team as descripbted in Commons:OTRS. regards --JuTa 16:23, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Löschfreigabe erteilt

Ich habe das Impressum von Thomas Seilnacht gelesen, und dort ist eine Weitergabe schriftlich untersagt, das Bild kann gelöscht werden. Hier der Link: [3]

Muss woanders suchen, vielleicht sollte ich mir jetzt immer erst einmal das Impressum durchlesen. Danke für die Info!!! --Mapmaster (talk) 00:20, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

OK, gelöscht. Gruß --JuTa 05:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

'Fraid I've got too many articles to write to be much bothered about all this stuff. The point is that there are plenty of logos of companies, organisations, etc. on Wiki articles.... Viva-Verdi (talk) 19:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

File:BSicon evCONTf.svg

Fixed. Thanks for alerting me to the problem. BT14 (talk) 19:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Apple-safari-screenie-3.1-win.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marcgalrespons 20:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Lizenzstatus

Hallo JuTa,

ich bin noch neu auf Wikipedia und kenne mich deshalb noch nicht recht gut aus. Die Datei "Horner beim Mürzman Extrem Duathlon (2014).jpg" habe ich käuflich beim Fotografen "Oliver Königshofer" der seine Fotos auf "www.actline.at" zeigt erworben. Beim Kauf hat er die Klausel "Mit der Zahlung übertragen ich die Werknutzungsbewiligung für den privaten Bereich. Gewerbliche Nutzungen (z.B. Prospekte, Inserate oder ähnliches) bedürfen einer eigenen Vereinbarung." bekanntgegeben. Diese Habe ich aber leider nur in einem E-Mail stehen. Reicht diese Klausel für eine veröffentlichung auf Wiki? Es ist ja keine gewerbliche Nutzung. Wenn ja, wie kann ich dass dann bestätigen? Die Datei "Horner beim Austria Triathlon über die Mitteldistanz (2013).JPG" wäre zum löschen. Wie geht das? Danke schon mal im voraus für deine Unterstützung und Liebe Grüße aus Oberösterreich, Triathlon1

Hallo Triathlon1, Commons und Wikipedia selbst sind zwar nicht kommerziell, aber all ihr Inhalt, kann und muss von jedem weltweit für jeden Zweck weiternutzbar sein - vergleiche z.B. Commons:Licensing. "Deine" Nutzungsvereinbarung mit dem Fotografen ist also nicht ausreichend, da sie sich
  1. nur auf Dich bezieht. D.h. Du darfst das Bild nutzen, aber sonst niemand.
  2. eine Gewerbliche Nutzung ausschließt.
Du könntest den Fotografen fragen, ob er bereit ist das Bild / die Bilder unter einer freien Lizenz zu veröffentlichen - {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} wird empfohlen aber es gibt noch viele weitere, siehe Commons:Copyright tags. In diesem Falle müsste er eine sog. Freigabeerklärung an das Commons-Support-Team schicken, so wie in Commons:OTRS bzw. Commons:OTRS/de beschrieben.
Gelöscht werden die Bilder in ca. einer Woche wenn sich am derzeitigen Zustand (ganz ohne Lizenz) nichts ändert. Gruß --JuTa 07:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Wie läuft das ab? Wenn ich ihn frage und er einverstanden ist, was müssen wir dann machen, sodass das nachgewiesen ist? ich habe da leider keine Ahnung wie sowas ablaufen kann!?! würde das Bild aber trotzdem gerne drinnen lassen, da ich finde, dass bei Personenbeschreibung auch ein Bild dazugehört.

Das ist dort beschrieben, abr gerne nochmals hier im einzelnen.
  1. Du schickst ihm eine Anfrage z.B. mit folgendem Text: Commons:Emailvorlagen#Einfache Bildanfrage
  2. Falls er einverstanden ist, schickt er dann den ausgefüllten Text von Commons:Emailvorlagen#Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber) an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org, und am besten auch CC an Dich.
  3. Sobald Du weisst dass die Einvrständniserklärung verschickt wurde, bearbeitest Du die Bildbeschreiungsseiten und fügst ein {{subst:OTRS pending}} hinzu. Dies verhindert dann die Löschung für ca. 30 Tage ober bis der Fall als OK oder nicht OK entschieden wurde.
Gruß --JuTa 08:36, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


Hallo JuTa,

Hab jetzt alles gemacht und hoffe das passt dann so. Danke für deine Hilfe. Ohne diese wäre das wohl nichts geworden.

Liebe Grüße Triathlon1

Thank you

Hi, thank you for completing and optimizing the two nominations for deletion. It is better as you made it. --FocalPoint (talk) 16:48, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

WWE NXT & Raw

Es sind normale Logos von Shows, wie zum Beispiel bei de:SmackDown oder de:Two and a half men. Wie kann ich da eine Lizenz angeben und was für eine? Ich habe ja schließlich nicht die Rechte daran, aber Logos sind doch gemeinfrei, oder? Dateiliste Grüße --T1m0b3 HSV (talk) 20:31, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Nein, Logos sind nicht gemeinfrei. Nur wenn sie die sog. de:Schöpfungshöhe nicht überschreiten können sie hier hochgeladen werden, vergleiche auch COM:TOO. In diesem Fall könnte man {{PD-textlogo}} und {{Trademarked}} als Lizenz verwenden. Deine beiden Fälle sind grenzwertig, aber Du kannst versuchen diese Liezenzen zu setzen und hoffen dass niemand anderes einen Löschantrag darauf stellt. Gruß --JuTa 20:36, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Ok, habe ich gemacht. Wird das jetzt nicht in den nächsten 7 Tagen gelöscht? --T1m0b3 HSV (talk) 21:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Ich hab' jetzt die Problem-Bausteine entfernt. Aber, wie gesagt, die Logos sind grenzwertig, da kann es leicht passieren dass jemand irgendwann mal einen Löschantrag o.ä. stellt. --JuTa 21:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Warum hat so gut wie jede Serie / TV-Show denn ein Logo, wenn die eh zwangsläufig mgw. gelöscht werden? --T1m0b3 HSV (talk) 21:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Ähhm, für die Serie selbst ist denk ich klar warum sie ein Logo führt. Wiedererkennungswert und so. Wenn Du die Wikipedia-Artikel meinst, nun ich sag ja nicht dass "deine" beiden Logos gelöscht werden. Aber die "Grenzwerte" wann etwas die Schöpfungshöhe überschreitet und wann nicht ist in unterschiedlichen Ländern sehr unterschiedlich und auch innerhalb eines Landes gibt es sehr unterschiedliche Auffassungen dazu. Hier auf Commons müssen wir sozusagen die Gesetze aller Länder der Welt beachten. Und da kann es durchaus passieren dass jemand einen Löschtantrag stellt, muss aber nicht. Für mich ist die Sache jetzt OK, ich kann aber nicht für alle anderen Commons Benutzer sprechen. Gruß --JuTa 21:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Test Bilder

Guten Abend, müßte mehrere Bildzeichen Hochladen zum Testen auf WikiVoyage und wollte fragen ob ich Sie dann nachher ohne weiteres Löschen kann? Oder gibt es eine andere Möglichkeit diese für eine festgelegte Testperiode abzulegen? Gruß --Walta (talk) 22:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Moin Walta. Ich kenn die Gepflogenheiten auf WikiVoyage nicht aber ggf. könnte es einfacher sein sie dort hochzuladen un auch wieder löschen zu lassen. Ansonsten gehe ich davon aus dass diese "Bildzeichen" urheberrechtlich OK sind. Ich würde sie dann hier beim Hochladen in der Beschreibung mit einem klaren Kommentar, dass es sich um temporäre Testdateien handelt schreiben. Nach Abschluss der Tests dann mit {{speedy|"Deine Begründung"}} dann einen Schnelllöschantrag stellen. Nach Stunden oder Tagen wird dem normalerweise problemlos stattgegeben, sollte es jedoch Wochen oder länger dauern kann und sollte es auch abglehnt werden. Das liegt u.a. daran dass ja alle Dateien hier auch außerhalb der Wikiwelt von jedermann weltweit nachgenutzt weren können. Je länger eine Datei hier existiert um so wahrscheinlicher eine mögliche Nachnutzung. Durch eine Löschung würde man dieser u.U. die Rechtsgrundlage entziehen. Gruß --JuTa 03:11, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Nabend werte User:JuTa. Habe wie du empfohlen hast bereits Drei Bildzeichen so markiert. Wie schnell werden solche Speedy Anträge gelöscht? Kann ich diese Antragsform auch für ein Bildzeichen verwenden ds noch keiner benutzt aber schon länger online ist ? Gruß --Walta (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
1. Hallo, gelöscht wird dort wenn ein Admin rauf schaut, im Schnitt irgendwas zwischen Minuten und Stunden.
2. Du kannst es versuchen, aber die Wahrscheinlichkeit dass es abgelehnt wird ist recht groß. Gruß --JuTa 17:07, 4 May 2014 (UTC)