User talk:Jozefsu

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jozefsu!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:30, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Anonymous kurgan Tornjos, Serbia.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Scoopfinder(d) 06:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I shall correct that. It was probably lost due to Wikimedia server failure. I had a notice during upload. Didn't even know the file made it. Thanks! Jozefsu (talk) 10:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Corrected --Jozefsu (talk) 10:53, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Redhead Goddess.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 17:19, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:48, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ciconia7.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MPF (talk) 17:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ciconia8 yr1999.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MPF (talk) 17:46, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo-phylles 2017[edit]

Hi,

I noticed many remarkable photos of botanics on your gallery.

The International Salon Photo-phylles should interest you ! Please have a look here : http://www.jjmilan.sitew.fr/#accueil.A

This is both a competition and a pedagogical exhibition. Each year the selected pictures are exhibited in various places for more than 3 months and they receive some 4 - 5,000 visitors, among them about 3,000 young people coming with their teachers.

The entry is completely free of charges. We would be honoured to receive some of your best pictures in Bordeaux.

Best regards, Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 21:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC), administrator of the french Wikibooks[reply]

File:Luka Nadlacki 1948.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vanjagenije (talk) 21:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Luka Nadlacki.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Luka Nadlacki.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Vanjagenije (talk) 21:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Из дела Луке Надлачког.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vanjagenije (talk) 21:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oswald iwerks.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kaldari (talk) 21:58, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

help with vector[edit]

Hi! I was trying to make a vector of Oswald from a 1928 print ad. But it seems I messed it up. Would you be able to help teach me how to fix it? I'd like to learn to make proper vectors. The original image was here. SDudley (talk) 02:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! First, congrats for the try, it's already pretty okay. I hope You used Inkscape for the conversion. Besides the fact the app is cross-platform (Linux/Windows) and free, it's easy to learn how to use it (lots of tutorials online). IF You used Inkscape I think You made only one mistake: when exporting the finished image, make sure you export only the image and NOT white areas of the workspace (indicated with rectangle borders, looking like a paper page). You click File>Document Propreties>Resize page to content (in the right window that show up). If I remember right, here You have to click two times. But, I'd delete the two black bars first.
With Inkscape it's a piece of cake to convert BUT: You first prepare the raster image (jpeg, in this case) with another picture editor of choice (You can use anithing from Windows Paint, Gimp, Paint.NET to online editors). Usually I start by first correcting the original a little bit (on desktop, erasing parts I don't need), and then redeucing the colors to less shades of gray (16 or 8 colors) because than it's easier for Inkscape to process it. But, in Your case, You can delete the two black bars right in Inkscape - basic editing: you draw a square around them, thus marking the part and just hit the erase button. Make sure the image is in "Ungrouped" mode, because if isn't, it treats the image as a whole and will not let you pick separate parts. All You need is to wipe out the excess. If you need coloring of a sort (though I always prefer black and white, because of it's smilarity to ink) You can additionally play with colors inside the program. The cool part is: Inkscape already treats white background as transparent when You save it as vector (with raster it's lot more complicated, and in case of jpeg not even possible). The Bad part of that: You need to define white parts separately - I simply drop white paint into those areas, and bingo. For a more purist, clean look, You must enlarge your image and tweak it a bit by manually moving lines (another benefit of vector editing). Time consuming 'though. And Vector also have it's limits. I still did not figured out how to trace "center-lines" in a simple line-drawn image, it forces what it calls "strokes" and "shapes". Anyway, as with any computer stuff, it's a learning process. If You need more help, i'm here.
P.S. I didn't know if Your intention was to convert the drawing only, or the letters too. You CAN do the letters also with Inkscape (the Path>Trace Bitmap command). But the Universal logo is too complicated, I'd leave it out.
I added the source image in the description, for Your convenience - it's proper for reference. You probably know: any corrected versions you just upload again to the same page, as many times as it's needed. If You find it hard to fix the vector (or do the letters) just write, I can do it for You, no problem.

Jozefsu (talk) 07:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]