User talk:Josve05a/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Copyright status: File:W H B Evans 1905.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:W H B Evans 1905.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reggae Rajahs - ZIggy B, MoCity, Zooz, Diggy Dang, Belights.jpg[edit]

Hi, I saw that you deleted the image I uploaded. I have full permission for the image as I am the person that took it. I also made sure I used an image that hasn't been used online yet. What can I do to get it un-deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rootboi Root (talk • contribs) 1 July 2014 kl. 10.22‎ (UTC)

File tagging File:Wedge document cover.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wedge document cover.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Leyo 22:35, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: OTRS-mail sent. Josve05a (talk) 22:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: toollabs:wikishootme[edit]

Found it? --Nemo 07:13, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, so much! (Yay!) - Happy editing! Josve05a (talk) 08:20, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Gandhi Peace Award Medallion - front side.jpg[edit]

{{Autotranslate|1=File:Gandhi Peace Award Medallion - front side.jpg|base=Image license}} And also: * [[:File:Robert Rix.jpg]] No required [[Commons:Copyright tags|license templates]] were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my [[User talk:Jarekt|talk page]]. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 11:36, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jarekt: Fixed Thanks! Josve05a (talk) 13:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Noureed Awan C.E.O MMA Group of Companies.jpg[edit]

File:Noureed Awan C.E.O MMA Group of Companies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 01:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Dear Reviewer[edit]

If you use the helper-scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-

Hi Josve05a, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User reviewer}} or {{User trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Natuur12 (talk) 09:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To Gage Skidmore (I know you'll get here and starting talking to me)[edit]

I had no knowledge that you were a user here on Commons, nor that you wanted to upload the pictures from Comic-Con yourself. For that I am truly sorry! I was told on IRC after I had done that that you had an account here on Commons and that I should not have done what I did.

If there is anything I could do to fix it, but I can't...Again, I am truly sorry!

Yours truly

Josve05a (talk) 02:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I love your pictures, they are amazing! Josve05a (talk) 02:48, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RFA closed[edit]

I'm sorry to see things end this way. I closed the RFA and archived it. INeverCry 22:57, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:A synthetic landscape at a trillion watts by Cole Sternberg.jpg[edit]

{{Autotranslate|1=File:A synthetic landscape at a trillion watts by Cole Sternberg.jpg|base=Image license}} And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 05:43, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Josve05a (talk) 12:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:BYellowBStokeLive2012.jpg[edit]

File:BYellowBStokeLive2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hairhorn (talk) 13:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ali Bakhsh 01.jpg[edit]

File:Ali Bakhsh 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

91.65.48.17 07:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 16:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daniel Edlen creates art on the artifacts of creativity, photo by Zane Ewton, 2010 2014-07-08 15-53.jpg[edit]

Thanks for the heads up about the deletion of File:Daniel Edlen creates art on the artifacts of creativity, photo by Zane Ewton, 2010 2014-07-08 15-53.jpg. I've sent the permission email and posted a request to undelete. Can you help with the process? Thanks!166.137.182.226 18:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bkörn Skifs show i Linköping (5146089075).jpg[edit]

File:Bkörn Skifs show i Linköping (5146089075).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 11:42, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Thanks for the notification about these, but I can't sadly help. They seem to have been uploaded during a period when Commons helper wasn't properly transfering information blocks, I suggest you ask an admin at English Wikipedia to see if the deleted file description page contained the information required, Otherwise per policy they'll HAVE to be deleted here. :( ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:02, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosecrans and Bragg.jpg[edit]

Shame on you Josve05a, first you remove the source and than you tag it as no source? That borders vandalism. Please don't ever do that again otherwise you might find yourself blocked on this project. Multichill (talk) 11:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Umm...are you looking at what it said? It says "moved from Wikipedia", that does not indicate the sources from the pictures. Josve05a (talk) 12:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Váry Zsolt[edit]

I sent license today from Zsolt Váry to Permissions - Hungarian Wikipedia. Thanks for your help.

--User:Pataki Mártaforrás 19:46, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thuraya SatSleeve.png[edit]

File:Thuraya SatSleeve.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

   FDMS  4    13:23, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AW.E.F._Britten_-_The_Early_Poems_of_Alfred%2C_Lord_Tennyson_-_Sleeping_Beauty.png&diff=137952042&oldid=137951563[edit]

I'm in Britain. British law says it does, so don't commit copyvio: ask first. I'd probably be willing to let that one move to my less-demanding, "The restorationist, Adam Cuerden, requests attribution for his work" - but I have a rather careful system in place, where I'm careful to give a level of request suitable to the work done. But, long story short - Britain has a very low threshold of originality - indeed, apparently, even Template:PD-Text isn't safe here - so I do have more right to copyright here than I might elsewhere. See Commons:Threshold_of_originality#United_Kingdom where it's shown that en:File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg is copyrighted in the UK.

Ridiculous? Yes. Which is why I try to limit any claims on my behalf to particularly difficult, time consuming restorations with a lot of reconstruction, and implicitly release the rest. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:37, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LOC image[edit]

I don't know what you were actually intending with this edit] but you left the image without any licence so it appeared in the category Category:Media without a license: needs history check. I have reverted it for now. Maybe you can start again but ensure the licence shows properly and the LOC links works. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 16:33, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes! Thanks! Josve05a (talk) 17:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Europa tävlingens 1-a pris.png[edit]

File:Europa tävlingens 1-a pris.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

   FDMS  4    16:52, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ungdomsvakta-logo.jpg[edit]

File:Ungdomsvakta-logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

   FDMS  4    20:33, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Kaeser.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Joe Kaeser.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 11:54, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seriefigurer introducerade 1965.png[edit]

File:Seriefigurer introducerade 1965.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— revimsg 04:35, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{Commonist}}[edit]

I usually place {{Commonist}} below license tags, as Commons android app did so. (too lazy to find sources, but my one of my oldest uploads should have Android tag below the license. Self-revert please? — revimsg 01:04, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can self-revert, but I do not agree with it. SO I'll do it under protest. Josve05a (talk) 01:24, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I had no chance of booting my computer today, so I will do it (which was discussed on IRC) tomorrow (I should be able to use school computer tomorrow...) — revimsg 14:38, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:논갈이.jpg etc - satisfied? — revimsg 11:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

0214_Wisbeck.svg[edit]

Hi, Unfortunately you changed the color. I have tried the SVG editor, but I had some problems. The size was very small, but the colors changed to black. The Inkscape can make horrible file sizes, but you can use the cleanup function and you can save your images in Optimized SVG. Some times it makes smaller files, but I have found a better thing. If you have an extremely big file, you can save as PDF but you have disable the rastered image function. Close the Inkscape and open the PDF with the Inkscape. Next step, you can save your image to standard SVG or optimized SVG. Not all times, but the file size will reduce dramatically. My best result is about 10% file size! Few months ago I use the Inkscape daily version. Let's try it. I think you will like it. Bye, Madboy74 (talk) 17:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting me. I will investigate this further, and look for ways to make them smaller. Odd that it got black...Josve05a (talk) 17:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From VI[edit]

Hi Johnatan. You should put less competition VI image simultaneously. 2 or 3 appointments per day is a good choice. If you have doubts about the scopes or appointment request me, I'll help you. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Jonatan*) @Archaeodontosaurus: Thank you for your tip. I have never done anything related to VI before, so this is a new field for me, so I'm still learning. -Josve05a (talk) 07:43, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr photo request[edit]

Hi Jonatan,

as requested on flickr I've uploaded these to photos:

--Albspotter (talk) 09:05, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Albspotter: Now you have lost me...what have I done on flickr? Josve05a (talk) 09:08, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You, or someone else that linked to your commons profile, posted a comment on these two photos and asked to release those under CC-BY-SA. I won't relase all of my photos under this licence but I can do it for some more and upload them to commons. --Albspotter (talk) 12:46, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, it could have been me. Thank you for sharing these wonderful photos under a free license! Josve05a (talk) 12:50, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acaena novae-zelandiae, mature fruit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jytte Guteland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
SL X420.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adam Hayward.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
British Rail Class 375s, interiors.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lindsey House, engraving.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

File:A Skull in Connemara (cropped).jpg[edit]

File:A Skull in Connemara (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

   FDMS  4    02:25, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated File:Issum - Brauerei Diebels 07 ies.jpg[edit]

Hi Josve05a, thank you for nominating this image but here you got one of my only medium quality ones. It's visibly barrel distorted and therefore not worth a nomination. Actually I uploaded some thousends of much better quality images. Greetings -- Ies (talk) 12:17, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 18:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Matilda Berggren.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, 1989 23:30, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Locon 203 163 (V100) nadert Amersfoort met een sleep afvalwagens (13993204038).jpg[edit]

May you recategorize this picture?--Kopiersperre (talk) 12:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Better? I am working on it! [1]. Josve05a (talk) 13:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hej![edit]

Hej! Svar på dina OTRS-kommentarer finns nu här. Mvh.--Paracel63 (talk) 22:13, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brussels Airlines Airbus A330 OO-SFO naar Dakar (14735458865).jpg[edit]

File:Brussels Airlines Airbus A330 OO-SFO naar Dakar (14735458865).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

67.87.46.39 23:24, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My wife gave a picture of me to Pablo Ruiz[edit]

Hi Jonatan -- I just want to confirm that the picture Pablo Ruiz (who is here visiting now) used to put in the Wikimedia was given to him for that purpose (he erased a woman who was sitting behind me in the original). As Pablo said he told you, it's good for us Wikipedia users to try to police copyright violations, but this isn't one.

I love that picture and use it everywhere, including in my Google profile. 

 Best, Josh

(Timestamp added afterwards, for archive-bot: 20:57, 11 December 2014 (UTC))

A barnstar for you![edit]

From Nemo[edit]

The Barnstar of Diplomacy
For graciously bearing the assaults you received for your hard work from a person (supposedly "adult") who should know better. Nemo 20:34, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. If there is one thing I have lernt in years here on different WIkimedia-projects it is that it always pays out to take the high road. No matter how uncomfterble it is. Josve05a (talk) 21:08, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From Russavia[edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thanks for doing such a thankless job here on Commons. Just know, it has not gone unnoticed. russavia (talk) 20:39, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
doing such a thankless job - Not so thankless anymore, thank you! Josve05a (talk) 21:08, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nickispeaki[edit]

Hi! Please, look at this. --Nickispeaki (talk) 21:39, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stena Britannica model of the ship itself near the reception (13228297345).jpg[edit]

File:Stena Britannica model of the ship itself near the reception (13228297345).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 17:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Model Stena Seamaster class (13228614594).jpg[edit]

File:Model Stena Seamaster class (13228614594).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 17:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Model Stena HSS (13228436253).jpg[edit]

File:Model Stena HSS (13228436253).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 17:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Model MS Koningin Beatrix (13228436123).jpg[edit]

File:Model MS Koningin Beatrix (13228436123).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 17:02, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stena Seabridger model (13228435323).jpg[edit]

File:Stena Seabridger model (13228435323).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 17:03, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

your campaigns cancellation made without criterion[edit]

helo josve05a, I have see (by the buildings for no fop ITALY case) with chocolate eggs (for example), which you put in deleting entire categories of images, taken in mass (to do all the same brush) and put in cancellation, random, without analyzing what you propose to be deleted. Not all cancellations are seen by employees and this creates a large amount of damage to the commons. If you do not stop to remove random pictures I have to alert you to an administrator, it is not the first time that I invite you to do things with a minimum of judgment. In this way harm commons seriously and against regulations. you waste time (Your time and time than others)and disincentives for nothing users (in the right) to upload images corrected. I trust in your understanding and cooperation, and I wish you a pleasant stay on commons. For any questions please contact me on my talk page --Pava (talk) 07:59, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Strologoff[edit]

Hi, I don't know what happened, but there is a problem with this page. Could you fix it please? Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:14, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also many of your nominations are PD-textlogo. I deleted these which are not. I also didn't delete borderline cases. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:CCCSTI--OrgChart--2008.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:CCCSTI--OrgChart--2008.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:CCCSTI--OrgChart--2008.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

1989 20:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The file Nouvelle borne col du Mont-Cenis.jpg[edit]

Hi,

I have the written agreement from the author to use this picture on Wikipedia. I can foward you the mail if you want a proof or just contact the author. I have followed all the rules regarding copyrighting

Thank you for your attention Best regards --Gabriel Haute Maurienne (talk) 00:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Gabriel Haute Maurienne: We get a large number of ambiguous e-mails from copyright holders intending to allow Wikipedia to reuse their content. (such as "I allow Wikipedia to reuse my photos"). Unfortunately, such permissions are not sufficient from a legal point-of-view. We need a more-specific declaration of consent to accept your permission. Please read WP:DONATEIMAGE. Josve05a (talk) 00:18, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nouvelle_borne_col_du_Mont-Cenis.jpg[edit]

Hi, Ok to erase, the picture is from Flick, I've uploaded another version with the proper information Sorry for the inconvenience Kind regards --Gabriel Haute Maurienne (talk) 17:40, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An update on the File metadata cleanup drive[edit]

Hello Jonatan,

I wanted to thank you for offering to help with the File metadata cleanup drive on Commons. We now have numbers to measure the amount of files missing machine-readable information on Commons. Most of the files here have a license template, but there still about 500,000 remaining files (out of 24 million) missing an {{Information}} template, and that's where your help would be invaluable.

We're currently trying to find groups of files whose description pages are alike, so that we can use bots to automatically take that information and put it into an information template. If you still want to help, it would be great if you could look at the list of files and see if you can find such groups. You can also use the no_information tool to limit the results by uploader, or the first characters of the file name; this can help identify batch uploads.

Once you find groups of files with information in the same order or format, you can add a section to the bot requests page, so that a bot can go through them and fix them all automatically (or you can do it yourself if you have a bot, or with VisualFileChange).

In 10 days, we've already managed to add information templates to over 10% of the 500,000 remaining files. I'm hoping you can help us keep this momentum and get through the rest so we can get rid of this backlog once and for all :)

Thank you, and I wish you happy end-of-year holidays if you celebrate them! Guillaume (WMF) (talk) 18:39, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Multiple dairy cartons (226051).jpg[edit]

File:Multiple dairy cartons (226051).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 17:31, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review?[edit]

What's the motivation for the review-tagging of a whole bunch of images posted on Mynewsdesk by the Maritime Museum in Stockholm?

Peter Isotalo 09:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, just don't tag[2][3] PD art because it came Mynewsdesk. The origin of a file has zero relevance if it's public domain due to age. Someone could have stolen it from an stock photo data bank for all we care. It still wouldn't affect the free copyright status.
Peter Isotalo 10:06, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
When adding lr-tag to a bunch of files (Which actually needs it) there is bound to be a small percent of false possitives/errors. I'm sorry for those. Josve05a (talk) 11:45, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blasieholmen at Nybroviken in Stockholm.jpg[edit]

Hej. Såg att du märkt upp denna med File from MyNewsdesk, external source, in need of license review I pressmaterialet, som nu är borttaget var filen tydligt uppmärkt med CC3-licens. Detta tillskillnad från många av de övriga bilderna i Nobelstiftelsens releaser där de varit märkta med copy right. Kan jag plocka bort din uppmärkning, eller hur är det tänkt att gå vidare? --I99pema (talk) 10:38, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@I99pema: Då får vi gå till http://archive.org/web/ etc. och leta. Om vi inte kan hitta bilden och bevis av licensen, så måste den tas bort. Läs gärna COM:LR. Josve05a (talk) 10:41, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@I99pema: Ta Da!. Josve05a (talk) 10:45, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Så bra att du hittade den och att licensen nu "formaliserats"! Kände inte till det här med license rewiev innan, men inser nu att om jag hittar liknande bilder i pressmaterial så är det bästa att lägga till mallen själv vid uppladdning så att den formellt kan godkännas och därmed undvika ett framtida ifrågasättande.--I99pema (talk) 12:23, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@I99pema: Precis, i fall om nåågot sånt här skulle kunna hända igen, eller om de skulle ändra licensen på sin hemsida, så ska vi kunna "bevisa" att den varit under den sagda licensen. Samma sak gäller till exempel bilder från Flickr ({{Flickr review}}) etc. Josve05a (talk) 12:27, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding taggings[edit]

I started a thread regarding the issues raised at the recent reviewer request at Commons talk:License review#Adding to the workload. Peter Isotalo 14:21, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please check before adding a LR tag. This is already reviewed. Also I think that old documents do not need a LR, as they are in the public domain whatever is the license at source. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:38, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
About the doubble tagging, I'm sorry, The Batch editor didn't show me that these were already reviewed. About the PD images, please refere to #Review? above. Josve05a (talk) 14:41, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, please note that this is not merely aimed at Josve. I'm pretty surprised by a lot of aspects that have nothing to do with the actions of any individual reviewer.
Peter Isotalo 17:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Medalofhonor-navy.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Medalofhonor-navy.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate LR tags[edit]

Have a look at this. I'm getting quite a few of these. @Butko: uses a bot to tag all his Youtube uploads for review. He does a lot of Youtube uploads, so we could end up with a lot of duplicate taggings. I wonder if he could adjust the bot to do the LR tagging sooner, or to pass files over that're already tagged, or if you could find a way of filtering out his uploads when you tag Youtube uploads. INeverCry 21:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about this. (Refer to above sections). I just tagged all files within a "from YouTube" category without OTRS or LR. Josve05a (talk) 21:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In this case, the best solution would be for Butko to to have his bot tag these uploads for LR within 24 hours. As for the duplicate tags, I'm just going to do the LR and leave both tags, as Rillke's script adjusts both at the same time, and removing duplicates is just too time consuming. INeverCry 21:20, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps the bot should be able to detect if an existing LR tag already have been added manually, and if there is to, remove duplicates. Can't be that hard to programme/code? Josve05a (talk) 21:23, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've been noticing that you've been tagging files that had been already reviewed. On VisualFileChange, it should tell you that the file has been already reviewed, and doesn't need to be reviewed twice. 1989 22:55, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to tick of those that had been already reviewed, some of these might be human error and some might not have displayed as already reviewed, I do not know. However, it can never hurt to do a doubble check. Josve05a (talk) 22:59, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year[edit]

Happy new yeaaar, a 2015 of good things, wishes happy holidays --Pava (talk) 14:36, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pava: Happy New Year for you too! Let this year be the best year ever! Josve05a (talk) 14:39, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images from the Gothenburg Opera[edit]

It appears that they have cleared some images that I uploaded back in April 2012 and that used to be able at their Mynewsdesk account. File:Tobiasson-ingrid-foto-mats-backer liten.jpg, File:Zetterstrom ake press 1122.jpg, File:Bergkwist Iwar Press 0106.jpg have all been deleted at their source pages. File:Binder adolphe 2-foto-joakim-roos.jpgand File:Binder adolphe 1-foto-joakim-roos.jpg remain available. OTOH, they have some other CC-BY images now that weren't yet available at the time when these uploads were made. --Hegvald (talk) 07:42, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

THis seems to have been answered on INeverCry's talk page. Josve05a (talk) 16:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Färila kyrka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
@ArildV: Josve05a (talk) 06:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No source[edit]

With this edit you tagged an image as having no source when it fact it does have a source. You just cannot verify the source give because the image is no longer available. My previous tag for no permission should have been sufficient and it will likely be deleted anyway, so I don't know why you needed to add another deletion tag. Ww2censor (talk) 22:27, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't necessary directly, I was just reviewing the flickr-review cat which had "automated" reviews, which needed a human being to also review it. I pressed source not found, since the link was dead, and that caused it to add another template. Josve05a (talk) 22:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I already did a human review and based on that had already tagged it. You just added a tag that was basically unnecessary. Sorry to complain but I don't think there was any need to waste time on it. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 23:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Meh, it doesn't hurt, right. Josve05a (talk) 23:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Edit conflict) Actually I think it does, especaily as we are all volunteers who need as much time as we can get to deal with bad images, so investigating an image that has already been tagged wastes your time and then I will review what was done to it by you, so we both waste time. Maybe you have lots of it but I think we all need to work as efficiently as possible. It's just my opinion. Good night. Ww2censor (talk) 23:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Josve05a/Archive_3&oldid=145843997"