User talk:Jospe

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Français : Bienvenue sur Commons, Jospe!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
Les premiers pas

Le tutoriel des premiers pas et la FAQ peuvent énormément vous aider. Ils expliquent comment personnaliser votre interface (pour la langue par exemple), comment importer des fichiers, sans oublier les licences. Des compétences techniques ne sont pas indispensables. Soyez clair et présumez des bonnes intentions des autres. C'est un wiki - rien de très compliqué.

Obtenir de l'aide

Plus d'informations sont disponibles sur le portail communautaire. Vous pouvez posez des questions sur le service d'aide, le Bistro, ou encore sur IRC, au canal #wikimedia-commons. Vous pouvez également contacter un administrateur sur sa page de discussion.

Outils et astuces
Vous avez fait une erreur ?
  • Voulez-vous renommer un fichier ? Importez simplement l'autre fichier et écrivez sur l'ancien : {{bad name|LE NOUVEAU NOM CORRECT}}
  • Pour plus d'informations, lisez les règles de suppression
(P.S. Vous pouvez émettre une critique ou un commentaire sur ce message de bienvenue)

le Korrigan bla 10:47, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


File:Gavarni,_monument_place_Saint-Georges.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Teofilo (talk) 22:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Club_démocratique_novembre_1848.JPG[edit]

{{Autotranslate|1=File:Club_démocratique_novembre_1848.JPG|base=Image source}}Martin H. (talk) 17:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Résolu. Jospe (talk) 17:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
K, if you use the basic upload form you can add the information very quickly directly with the upload. With your upload methode the "Own work" will be written forever in the upload log and so it is written for all times on the file description (section: #Historique_du_fichier). --Martin H. (talk) 17:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. It's a better method. I'll use it now. Thanks. Jospe (talk) 17:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Église St-Pantaléon de Gueberschwihr[edit]

If you don't object, we could delete File:Église St-Pantaléon de Gueberschwihr - nef.JPG IMHO. --Túrelio (talk) 21:21, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. It's OK. Jospe (talk) 09:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Jospe!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Nicolas Oudinot has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ji-Elle (talk) 08:01, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:37, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done Jospe (talk) 21:19, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the edit comment line[edit]

Hallo Jospe, Please use the edit comment line this would have been helpful here. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 23:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

L'Illustration, journal universel[edit]

Salut, Jospe. Please note that {{PD-Art}} alone is not sufficient for licensing. All such images must also be in the Public Domain in the United States but PD-Art has a copyright term of 70 years after the death of the author which does not apply to the US. Please use {{PD-Art-two|PD-old|PD-1923}} to indicate that images from that magazine are also PD in the United States. Regards, De728631 (talk) 13:46, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon. It's OK. I will use this licence for the next files. Thank you for your advice. Jospe (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Affiche GUD rue Cujas.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 10:19, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression inexplicable d'informations[edit]

Je m'aperçois que pour les deux caricatures de Moloch que j'avais placées dans l'article Édouard Drumont un robot a sans la moindre justification supprimé la source, la date et l'auteur. Je suppose que par la suite un autre robot ou un humain viendra supprimer ces images sous prétexte qu'il manque ces informations essentielles. Auriez-vous l'obligeance de les rétablir ? Merci infiniment. 81.51.1.249 19:10, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Jacques Weiss[edit]

Bonsoir,

Weiss a été ministre plénipotentiaire. Voilà pourquoi j'avais ajouté la catégorie diplomates. Y a-t-il une meilleur catégorie ? ~Pyb (talk) 18:52, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,
Il semblerait que je sois passé à côté du passage de Weiss au ministère des Affaires étrangères. Effectivement, cela peut inciter à lui attribuer cette catégorie. J'annule donc mon revert. Bonne soirée, Jospe (talk) 19:06, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Coston, Henri Georges.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Coston, Henri Georges.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Octave.H (talk) 07:37, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

le Grand, le Petit[edit]

Bonjour Jospe. Au sujet de cette modification, je te signale deux livres ([1], [2]) qui précisent qu'Alfred le Grand était l'un des pseudonymes, avec Caporal, d'Alfred le Petit.

Si tu en conviens, il parait logique de le mentionner désormais.

Bonne continuation !--Sammyday (talk) 17:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Sammyday,
Merci pour ton message.
Je pense que Philippe Jones (auteur de la 2e référence, citée comme source dans la première) est dans l'erreur. A l'époque du boulangisme, Le Petit, après avoir travaillé pour Le Grelot (où officiait désormais exclusivement l'anti-boulangiste Pépin), dessinait pour La Charge. Je persiste à penser que le dessin de la Diane, beaucoup plus maladroit que les productions de Le Petit (qui était un authentique artiste), est l’œuvre d'un caricaturiste de second ordre qui a rendu un double hommage à Le Petit, en le représentant au premier plan des boulangistes et en choisissant un nom de plume ironique (le maître étant Le Petit et le disciple étant "Le Grand").
A bientôt,
Jospe (talk) 15:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merci[edit]

Bonjour.

Je voulais juste vous remercier pour les catégories ajoutées aux diverses images concernant Pierre Bonny et Esterhazy. Je compte bien revenir mettre plus au propre tout cela, mais le temps m'a manqué ces toutes dernières semaines. Vos exemples me seront bien utiles.

--Sichek (talk) 10:18, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Il n'y a pas de quoi. Merci surtout à vous pour tous ces intéressants documents. Jospe (talk) 15:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


File:Soir de bataille (caricature Doumer présidentielle 1906).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aleister Crowley 1929.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

J Milburn (talk) 15:15, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tombé place de la Concorde le 6 février 1934.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 13:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Place de la Concorde 7 février 1934.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goesseln (talk) 14:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soir de bataille (caricature Doumer présidentielle 1906).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 20:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop it. It is clearly correct. It is Leo Taxil, all over the Web in different versions of the image the Person is named Leo Taxil. People change their look, when they become older. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the source of this portrait ? These websites are not accurate sources. People can change their look but not their face. Jospe (talk) 17:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I made an adminstrative descission. You can request this, you can ask for a second or third opinion. But you don't have the right to undo an adminsitrative descission. Or we can stop the project. It is impossible to work in anarchy! Do it again and I have to see it as vandalism. Marcus Cyron (talk) 17:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
With no offense intended, I state that your decision is wrong. Jospe (talk) 17:43, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ce "portrait" photographique me semble douteux, en effet. Sur la plupart des versions de Wikipedia, je l'ai donc remplacé par cet autre fichier. Bien cordialement. Guise
File:La Cagoule (Cabrol).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

82.124.119.234 21:08, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Jospe. Quel est votre avis sur cette demande de suppression ? Personnellement, je trouve qu'effacer ce fichier serait regrettable mais plaçons-nous du point de vue du droit : le fait que le contenu du magazine Regards soit accessible sur Gallica ne change-t-il pas la donne ? Pourriez-vous poser la question aux spécialistes sur Wikipédia et W. Commons ?... Bien cordialement. Guise (talk) 10:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Le Petit ou Le Grand[edit]

Bonjour Jospe. Je reviens vers toi après ceci. Il est écrit (mais pas sourcé) qu'Alfred Le Petit utilisait notamment le pseudonyme d'Alfred Le Grand dans ses œuvres. Serait-il possible que Le Petit soit encore là l'auteur ?--Sammyday (talk) 23:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Sammyday. Je persiste à penser que l'auteur de ce dessin est plutôt un admirateur de Le Petit, qu'il a représenté et nommé au premier plan, à gauche. Si on compare ce dessin à ceux d'Alfred Le Petit à la même époque, l'écart qualitatif est évident. Je pense que cette signature est plutôt un clin d’œil ou un hommage. Jospe (talk) 06:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Pietri, Joseph Marie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 07:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Degrelle, Leon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 15:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

La Cagoule[edit]

Bonjour, Jospe.

Je crains que les caricatures de René Dubosc et Raoul Cabrol (1, 2) ne soient pas libres de droits en raison des dates respectives de leur décès (1964 et 1956).

Je viens de m'en rendre compte en téléchargeant un fichier qui inclut une oeuvre de Cabrol (dont je n'avais initialement pas reconnu la signature...).

C'est fâcheux (d'autant plus qu'une belle caricature de Cabrol relative aux cagoulards a déjà été supprimée sur Commons) mais je pense qu'il faut demander de supprimer tous ces fichiers, qu'en dites-vous ?

Bien cordialement. --Guise (talk) 15:55, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Guise,
J'ai effectivement téléversé des caricatures qui se sont avérées non libres de droit, même si certaines d'entre elles ont plus d'un siècle (exemple : une caricature sur la présidentielle de 1906, mais dont l'auteur est mort il y a moins de 70 ans). Du coup, je fais désormais plus attention et je croise les doigts pour que certaines d'entre elles ne soient pas supprimées avant leur entrée dans le domaine public dans quelques années. Du coup, si certains veulent les supprimer par souci de légalisme absolu, je ne tenterais pas (ou plus) de m'y opposer, mais je regrette tout de même que ces suppressions soient si sèches et ne laissent aucune trace, pas même un lien, vers ces documents (ne serait-ce que pour les re-téléverser le moment voulu). Merci pour ce message et bon week-end. Jospe (talk) 06:11, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Félix ou Frédéric ?[edit]

Cher Jospe, j'ai l'impression que cette image [[3]] est l'œuvre de Frédéric, frère de Félix : ce dernier signe nettement avec un Fx précédent son patronyme. Bien à vous, --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 12:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Marc-AntoineV. Je me suis posé la même question et j'ai simplement suivi la bio wikipédia de Félix, qui mentionne sa collaboration à la revue dont est extraite cette caricature, mais la confusion est cependant possible. Si vous avez des éléments de comparaison ou des sources qui permettent d'attribuer ce document à Frédéric plutôt qu'à Félix, n'hésitez-pas à modifier en conséquence. Merci pour votre message. Jospe (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 14:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Maître de 1537 - Sacrifice d'Isaac (Nuremberg).jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:39, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


File:Afficheurs pour Lanoir et Chautard 1910.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 12:06, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you please check the source of this image ? Thanks, — Racconish💬 13:40, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Jospe (talk) 14:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merci (je n'avais pas vu que tu étais francophone). — Racconish💬 14:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:House of Cunasc du Rosel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 22:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laurent Cunasc c.1870.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 22:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manoir du Petit-Roseau.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 22:10, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

Dear Jospe,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 15:33, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coty, François (Regards 1934-03-16).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DDupard (talk) 21:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bons serviteurs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 14:41, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pozzo di Borgo, Joseph Jean Mathieu Jerome (caricature).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 09:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pozzo et Duseigneur (Cabrol).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 09:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur d'Échérac[edit]

Bonjour, je viens de créer l'article sur ce sculpteur et maire de Sèvres, vous aviez auparavant créé la category dans Commons. Vous avez mis qu'il était chevalier de la L d'Honneur, mais j'ai recherché dans tous les sens dans la Base Léonore : rien !. Je cherche aussi où il serait enterré (à Montparnasse ?). Il a sculpté de nombreux bustes plutôt funéraires, peu sont localisés. Si vous avez des infos cela m'intéresse pour compléter l'article de Wilipédia. Merci à l'avance et bien cordialement. - Siren-Com (talk) 23:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Je viens de rajouter dans wikidata le lien vers le dossier de la base Leonore. Il a été nommé chevalier de la LH en 1885. Je vous laisse faire le nécessaire sur la page wikipédia (merci de l'avoir créée). Par contre, êtes-vous certain de l'accent aigu sur le premier E du nom ? (Dans le doute, il faudrait peut-être vérifier la signature). Bon week-end, Jospe (talk) 06:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merci, le problème pour "Léonore" venait que j'avais recopié bêtement la BnF qui le nomme Mallebay Du Cluzeau d' Échérac en oubliant un 'i' (on ne compte plus les erreurs dans les pages Bnf !). Pour le 'É' il est courant dans diverses sources et on peut se demander si ceux qui mettent 'E' ne font pas l'économie d'accentuer une lettre majuscule ? Reste à trouver où il est inhumé, soit à Paris ou à Guéret ? Bien cordialement. - Siren-Com (talk) 11:34, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, Il a été inhumé au cimetière du Montparnasse (19e division). Je viens de mettre le lien sur wikidata. Bon après-midi, Jospe (talk) 11:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
PS : finalement je m'aperçois que c'est la Légion d'Honneur qui s'est trompée avec son Maillebay, tous les autres sites donnentMallebay !. - Siren-Com (talk) 11:54, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Madonna meets Mad Meg. Masterpieces and Their Collectors (Antwerp, 2019-2022)

Bonjour, j'ai vu que vous étiez actif dans les annotations d'images et peut-être pourriez-vous m'aider dans le problème que présente le fichier ci-dessus : il possède des notes mais a l'affichage je n'ai que la note sur Louis XVIII qui apparaît. J'ai regardé dans le code et n'ai rien vu de suspect. J'ai fait quelques modifications mineures qui ne sont peut-être pas bonnes et à révoqué, rien n'a changé, je ne trouve pas la solution (les notes fonctionnent bien sur d'autres images). Si vous pouviez jeter un oeil là-dessus. D'autre part, j'ai créé la Category:18th and 19th-century french paintings of large group of personalities, si vous connaissez d'autres entrées à y mettre merci à l'avance. Bien cordialement - Siren-Com (talk) 12:03, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Désolé mais je n'ai pas trouvé de solution. Jospe (talk) 16:07, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Between Hell and Paradise. The Enigmatic World of Hieronymus Bosch (Budapest, 2022)

Copyright status: File:Cherchez le traître (Pilori, 1891-06-07).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cherchez le traître (Pilori, 1891-06-07).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:07, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 23:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 00:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Harden-Hickey ex-libris.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Harden-Hickey ex-libris.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coffinieres de Nordeck, Gregoire (general).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Emmanuel Dissais (talk) 18:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]