User talk:Jmh2o/Archive 7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thanks for the education

[[1]]


--PU1JFC AΩ (talk) 16:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Bonne Année Jean-Marie

Mais vois cette discussion en bas de ma page ici Mike Coppolano (talk) 01:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Salut

Le compte PostcardsBelgium est un compte secondaire qui ne me sert qu'à upload des cartes postales anciennes.

Et oui tu as raison pour ta remarque sur la licence.

Amicalement Arflhn (talk) 16:44, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Baby Rose - 2003-01-07 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - rue du Grand-Central 71-73 - 2022-04-03 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 18:56, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - boulevard Jacques Bertrand 43-45 - 2022-05-03 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - cimetière du Nord - tombe de la famille Louis Lambert - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - cimetière du Nord - tombe de la famille Audent - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Darville - monument à Jules Destrée - 2022-12-10 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:27, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - liaison entre la Sambre et le canal Charleroi-Bruxelles - 2021-07-21 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Providence metro station - 2021-07-21 - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - château urbain boulervard Émile Devreux 22 - 2023-02-05 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Place Élie Delferrière 12-13 - 2020-05-16 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AfricaMuseum - 2023-02-09 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 17:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AfricaMuseum - 2023-02-09 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 17:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AfricaMuseum - 2023-02-09 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 17:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AfricaMuseum - 2023-02-09 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 17:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AfricaMuseum - 2023-02-09 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality (All imgs are outstandings). --Terragio67 17:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Justice et paix - Alphonse Darville - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - château urbain boulervard Émile Devreux 22 - 2023-02-05 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:52, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Hôtel des chemins de fer - arrière - 2023-02-14 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of the Royal Museum for Central Africa - main façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vevey - rue du Lac 3-5-7 - 2022-06-27 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vevey - rue du Lac 3-5-7 - 2022-06-27 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:34, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vevey - rue du Lac 3-5-7 - 2022-06-27 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Categorisation could be improved, I've added a few. --Mike Peel 19:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariembourg - Villa Malter - 2023-02-26 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariembourg - église Sainte-Madeleine - 2023-02-26 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariembourg - église Sainte-Madeleine - 2023-02-26 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariembourg - maison communale - 2023-02-26 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:52, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariembourg - église Sainte-Madeleine - 2023-02-26 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please rotate CCW. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done using the center of the cross and the middle of the clock --Jmh2o 07:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. The cross at the top looks a bit soft at full resolution, but it is good enough IMHO --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:58, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - ligne Infrabel 140 - Infrabel - 2022-05-15- 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - ligne Infrabel 140 - Infrabel - 2022-05-15- 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Mostly good, but leaning out at the top-right, fixable with a perspective correction? --Mike Peel 21:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done --Jmh2o 12:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Much better, thanks. --Mike Peel 18:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Monceau-sur-Sambre - 2022-02-12 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 19:12, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
I did the already. All the verticals. How can it be better? It is an old castel. --Jmh2o 19:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Look at the building in the background on the right, also the street lamps, they are leaning in. The same applies to the right part of the castle --Poco a poco 07:33, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Indeed, I have upload a wrong version of the picture. Thanks. --Jmh2o 12:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:47, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle of Monceau-sur-Sambre seen from the southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcinelle - avenue Mascaux 20 - Joseph André - 2023-04-05 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nalinnes - Bultia - Église Saint-Benoît - 2023-04-05 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nalinnes - Bultia - Église Saint-Benoît - 2023-04-05 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gare de Charleroi-Sud - esplanade - travaux - 2022-04-24 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Julien Dulait - photo établissement Jean Malvaux - Livre d'or exposition Charleroi 1911 - tome 1 - page 123 - 01.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Julien Dulait - photo établissement Jean Malvaux - Livre d'or exposition Charleroi 1911 - tome 1 - page 123 - 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Little Red Riding Hood par El Nino76 - 2021-03-20 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - échangeur du Ring R9 à l'avenue Gillieaux - 2023-05-03 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - échangeur du Ring R9 à l'avenue Gillieaux - 2023-05-03 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 05:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - échangeur du Ring R9 à l'avenue Gillieaux - 2023-05-03 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Meets all QI creteria IMHO --J. Lunau 09:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - échangeur du Ring R9 à l'avenue Gillieaux - 2023-05-03 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you raise the shadows a bit? Otherwise, ok. --MB-one 13:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done is it better now ? --Jmh2o 14:47, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support Still quite dark, but good enough --MB-one 21:27, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jeux sans frontières - trophée emporté par Charleroi en 1980 à Fribourg (Suisse) - 04.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 05:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jeux sans frontières - trophée emporté par Charleroi en 1980 à Fribourg (Suisse) - 01.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 05:29, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Gilles - maison Hannon - 2023-06-04 - fenêtre du dressing au premier - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality but please add an English description --Ermell 17:04, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done But this is not an obligation on Commons. --Jmh2o 17:33, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Le Génie civil - Le canal du Centre en Belgique et l'ascenseur pour bateaux - 1889-01-05 - planche X - gauche - bpt6k6479251w f66.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Le Génie civil - Le canal du Centre en Belgique et l'ascenseur pour bateaux - 1889-01-05 - planche X - gauche - bpt6k6479251w f66.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thieu - pont-levis du canal du Centre - 2023-06-07 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:50, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal du Centre historique - Thieu - ascenseur n° 4 - descente - 2022-06-07 - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. -- 02:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - rue Isaac - maison Remy - 2022-05-08 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grandrieu - église Saint-Quentin - virtail - Mon père que votre volonté se fasse - 2023-04-09 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 14:54, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Courcelles - monument du Rognac - 2023-07-10 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Courcelles - Rognac - Monument - Vitrail - 2023-07-10 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Images sur les articles de Wikipédia

Bonsoir, vous venez de me répondre sur bistro. Merci. Je veux seulement ajouter des photos aux articles. Aidez moi seulement. Hildegard-96 (talk) 16:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

@Hildegard-96: Quels articles ? Sur la Wikipédia en français ? Voici la page d'aide : [2]. Cordialement. --H2O(talk) 16:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montignies-sur-Sambre - maison Charlier - 2023-07-20 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 11:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Maison de la laïcité - 2023-08-07 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Palais des Beaux-Arts - 2023-08-07 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:36, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - maison Bertinchamps - 2023-08-08 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lordenois 11:50, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Maison Bertinchamp - vitrail du salon - 2023-08-16 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:07, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - maison Bertinchamps - 2023-08-08 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - maison Marcel Depelsenaire - 2023-08-20 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 14:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - maison Capon - 2023-08-19 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 20:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Place du Manège - 2023-09-03 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Place du Manège - 2023-09-03 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Verticals shoud be corrected. --Ermell 20:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done --Jmh2o 07:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Université du Travail - bâtiment Gramme - entrée principale - 2023-09-20 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Université du Travail - bâtiment Gramme - hall d'honneur - 2023-09-20 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:37, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vellereille-les-Brayeux - Abbaye de Bonne-Espérance - vue depuis la cour d'honneur - 2023-09-23 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 18:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vellereille-les-Brayeux - Abbaye de Bonne-Espérance - vue depuis la cour d'honneur - 2023-09-23 - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:18, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - puits, anciennement au Marché-aux-Poulets, replacé rue des 4 fils Aymont - 2023-09-07 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, nice colours in the sky. --多多123 11:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bonne-Espérance - cour d'honneur vue d'ensemble..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vellereille-les-Brayeux - Abbaye de Bonne-Espérance - vue depuis la cour d'honneur - 2023-09-23 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 06:59, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vellereille-les-Brayeux - Abbaye de Bonne-Espérance - vue depuis la cour d'honneur - 2023-09-23 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 11:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Université du Travail - bâtiment Solvay - entrée principale - 2023-09-29 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Binche - Pharmacie Milet - 2023-10-08 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Plozessor 03:21, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Binche - Pharmacie Milet - 2023-10-08 - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Plozessor 03:21, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Binche - Pharmacie Milet - 2023-10-08 - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 20:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - brigade cycliste de la police de Charleroi - 2021-05-08 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Université du Travail - Bâtiment Solvau - maçonnerie - intérieur - 2023-09-29 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Université du Travail - Bâtiment Solvau - maçonnerie - intérieur - 2023-09-29 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:39, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Hôtel des Chemins de Fer - 2023-10-29 - 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Hôtel des Chemins de Fer - 2023-10-29 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Banque de Charleroi - pendant les travaux "Rive-gauche".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slightly tilted CCW --MB-one 12:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Jmh2o 11:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:45, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prinoth Raptor 500 broyeur forestier - Charleroi - 2023-12-07 - 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:00, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)