User talk:Jmh2o/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quelle est la source de l'image Charleroi_blason.gif? Et quel serait le blasonnement? J'ai de toutes autres armes pour cette commune, mais il serait bien sur possible qu'il y ait eu un changement après la fusion des communes.--Caranorn 12:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Charleroi-Au_pigeon_soldat.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 13:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

COA of Lithuania

The version you used was not made by me. The original image (made by me) was overwritten by User:Zscout370. I have changed the page to reflect the changes made. I also copied by original hand made version (not extracted) to a new page: Image:Alternate Coat of Arms of Lithuania.svg. --Ysangkok 17:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Jmh2o!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


File:Charleroi_-_Maurice_Cambier_-_plaque_Grand_Rue.jpg

File:Charleroi_-_Maurice_Cambier_-_plaque_Grand_Rue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 09:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Oude kaarten?

En wat is de regel met File:Liege.RELSE.TULE.SNCV.png? Het gaat over 1939, maar wel met een moderne kaart achtergrond.Smiley.toerist (talk) 22:14, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Sculptures de Martin Guyaux à Charleroi

Bonjour,

Le sculpteur est toujours vivant, et il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en Belgique, aussi la publication de photos de ces sculptures constitue-t-il pour l'instant (une évolution législative en la matière au niveau national ou plus probablement européen n'étant pas impropable dans les 20 ans à venir) une violation de droit d'auteur.

J'ai donc supprimé ces photos.

Si la problématique de pouvoir librement diffuser des photographies de lieux publics vous concerne, il pourrait être intéressant de créer un chapter local Wikimedia Belgium et d'y œuvrer pour des actions de sensibilisation et de lobbying en vue de l'adoption d'une liberté de panorama dans notre pays. --Dereckson (talk) 10:31, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Blason_utilisateur_jmh2o.svg

File:Blason_utilisateur_jmh2o.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Bulwersator (talk) 14:51, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Pierre Paulus.jpg

File:Pierre Paulus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 14:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Jules Destree.jpg

File:Jules Destree.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 12:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Charleroi - Ilot des sciences.jpg

File:Charleroi - Ilot des sciences.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 11:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Blason de Tournai

En quoi ma version ne respecte-elle pas le blasonnement comme décrit dans l'arrêté royal?

--Philjon (talk) 22:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Elle le respecte. Mais il est inutile de reproduire au mieux l'image tel que sur la site de la ville pour respecter "plus" le blason. À coller de trop prêt à une image publiée sous copyright, on peut même friser la violation de copyright. Je vous invite à ne pas écraser les versions précédentes, correcte du point de vue héraldique, mais d'uploader vos propositions alternatives. Bien à vous. --Jmh2o (talk) 08:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Thorembais-les-Beguines

Bonjour. Je vous remercie de votre correction de classement. Je dois vous avouer que je ne comprends pas bien la nuance. Je vous fait entièrement confiance .Mais j'ai déjà crée trois ou quatre articles avec les classement que j'avais fait. Est-ce que cela ne posera pas de problèmes? Je suppose que non. Merci et cordialement Mortier.Daniel (talk) 11:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Léon Degrelle à Charleroi - 01.jpg

File:Léon Degrelle à Charleroi - 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Paulae (talk) 20:45, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

:File:Église_réformée_Saint-Martin_de_Vevey_-_10_-_vitrail_du_chœur.jpg

I don't know how do you managed that, but while you perfectly cropped the image, the sharpness is now worse. Did you cropped the jpg or the RAW? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

I use a wrong picture. Now, it will be better. --H2O(talk) 11:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Art nouveau - sgraffite - Paul Cauchie - rue de la Montagne 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:49, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Maison dorée - verrière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:31, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Couillet - chevalements de la mine du Pêchon - 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments X marks the spot ... nice composition, well done --Daniel Case 07:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Couillet - chevalements de la mine du Pêchon - 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice detail all around, good exposure --Daniel Case 07:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

RE: File:Musée de Confluences 14-06-2014 parvis.jpg

Bonjour et merci pour le conseil ! Je n'avais pas réalisé que le Musée était une oeuvre d'art et qu'il était, par conséquent, interdit de diffuser la photo sur Commons. Au moins j'aurai appris un truc ... Du coup comment fait-on pour importer sur Wiki ? Impossible de trouver le formulaire d'import ... je me souviens que tout avais migré sur Commons il y a quelques années. Cordialement, Tibidibtibo (talk) 17:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Finalement j'ai trouvé le lien (il était bien caché !), merci, Tibidibtibo (talk) 18:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - quai de Brabant 15 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please check your image for perspective. It's leaning in (at the left).--XRay 10:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC).
I have upload a new version. Is it better now? --Jmh2o 08:21, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be slightly leaning out on both sides to me, but I think this is close enough. Mattbuck 15:32, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Thirth version. I think the limits of the main building are good vertical now. --Jmh2o 08:36, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 Support IMO it's OK now. --XRay 09:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - monument aux martyrs - victoire - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 19:52, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi-carte topographique de 1873.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - caserne Trésignies - 2015-03-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:30, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - La Garenne - la nature reprend ses droits.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plan général de la ville de Charleroi - 1880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the work of a Commoner. --Cccefalon 06:40, 14 May 2015 (UTC). Bien sûr que si : tout le travail d'assemblage est de moi. --Jmh2o 13:52, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 Comment I noticed your modification of the template and I assume good faith. :) Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:18, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - La Garenne - Building burned in charleroi - Mother Nature Strikes Back 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Fine motive! --Hubertl 05:45, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - May - Mother Nature Strikes Back

I'm afraid I shall have to remove File:Couillet - monument "Den Kameraden" - 06.jpg as it was uploaded before the challenge began, which is against the rules. I hope you can take more images for future challenges. -- Colin (talk) 22:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Effectivement, j'avais oublié cette consigne. --H2O(talk) 03:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Dampremy - monument aux morts 1914-1918 - avril 2015 - 4.jpg

File:Dampremy - monument aux morts 1914-1918 - avril 2015 - 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 18:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Dampremy - monument aux morts 1914-1918 - avril 2015 - 2.jpg

File:Dampremy - monument aux morts 1914-1918 - avril 2015 - 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 18:46, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - April - Back side/Voting

I'm afraid I'll have to remove the votes you added to this challenge after 31 May 2015. I'm sorry I didn't update the page to make it clear that voting had closed. However, I can only accept votes during the month voting is open. -- Colin (talk) 13:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - quai de Brabant 12 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK now, even when the shadows a bit too dark --Hubertl 19:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Bicentenaire de la bataille de Waterloo - 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:06, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Hôtel des Postes - 2015-04-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Chantier "Rive-gauche" - 2015-06-13 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:07, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Namur - railway station - State Coat of Arms of Belgium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit soft (strong denoising?), but good enough.--Jebulon 09:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Champ de bataille de Waterloo - zône frappée de servitude en vertu de la loi du 26 mars 1914.jpeg

Why the revert? -- PBS (talk) 19:30, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

It is not a map of the battle of Waterloo of 1815 but the map of the protected memorial area, protection by a law of 1914 (sorry if i write in bad english, I hope you understand}. --H2O(talk) 19:47, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Yes. Thanks. (and you write English far better than I write Français). -- PBS (talk) 19:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Merci. --H2O(talk) 19:59, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Xavier Desgain.jpg

Bonjour. Si tu confirmes que tu n'es pas l'auteur de cette photo et que tu n'as pas la permission de la publier, je vais immédiatement la supprimer. Dans ce cas, il faut demander la suppression de la photo, pas l'écraser avec une nouvelle version, car l'ancienne version reste toujours accessible et cela ne respecte pas le droit d'auteur. Cordialement, BrightRaven (talk) 12:01, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

cache-boulin tête de lion

Cher user Jmj20, hier on a volé les cache-boulin de notre maison, sans doute pour la feraille. on faisant des recherches sur internet, je trouve votre photo, et ils s'agît en faite exactement du même modèle. Pourriez-vous me dire si votre tête de lion serait disponible?

File:IMGP7247
tête de lion
Lorsque j'ai pris la série de photos, l'objet, provenant d'un immeuble démoli dans la rue du Collège, était entreposé à la librairie Fafouille-Grandchamp au Passage de la Bourse à Charleroi. Je ne sais pas ce qu'il est devenu. --H2O(talk) 01:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Merci user Jmj20, Les 4 têtes de lion de la rue du Collège à Charleroi seront bientôt à nouveau posés sur un bâtiment, rue Gustave Fuss à Schaerbeek.

Je n'ai fait que fournir un petit renseignement. Si vous avez l'occasion de publier une photo… merci ! --H2O(talk) 18:41, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jumet - parc Bivort - grille de l'entrée rue Maximilien Wattelar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 07:31, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Bicentenaire de la bataille de Waterloo - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Emile Tumelaire - plaque dans la rue Tumelaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Jmh2o,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - cimetière du Nord - victimes civiles de la Deuxième Guerre mondiale - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:16, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Le Levant

Bonjour,

J'ai vu que vous aviez publié un article sur le Kot-à-Projet Levant, serait-il possible de vous contacter pour avoir plus d'infos à ce sujet? Je fais partie de ce kot et on aimerait en savoir plus sur ses débuts,

Bonne journée — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.11.205.47 (talk) 17:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour, Créez vous un compte, puis, contactez-moi par mail privé. Bien à vous. --H2O(talk) 19:35, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcinelle - avenue Paul Pastur 172 - 02 - céramique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcinelle - avenue Paul Pastur 166 - 02 - céramique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcinelle - avenue Paul Pastur 168 - 02 - céramique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcinelle - avenue Paul Pastur 170 - 02 - céramique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Plan de l'abbaye du Val des Écoliers de Mons.jpg

Bonsoir. Comme tu sembles t'y connaître, pourrais-tu jeter un œil sur ce fichier que je viens de télécharger ? Il s'agit d'une copie, du dix-neuvième siècle sans doute, d'un plan dressé en 1796. A priori, c'est dans le domaine public, mais sait-on jamais. Merci d'avance, Lykos (talk) 19:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

@Lykos: l'auteur mort le plus récemment l'est depuis plus de 70 ans, donc, aucun problème. Tu peux même rogner l'image pour supprimer la source Gallica, source à maintenir évidemment dans la description. Bien à toi. --H2O(talk) 08:54, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done. Merci. Lykos (talk) 18:03, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Avec plaisir… --H2O(talk) 20:17, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Maison picarde

J'ai pensé à toi, File:Mouscron, faïences murales J1.jpg Clin

--Jamain (talk) 15:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

@Jamain: superbe, merci ! Il y a de belles choses dans la ville de Mouscron… --H2O(talk) 16:29, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
@Jamain: J'y ai mis en peu d'ordre en espérant que cela ne soit pas du désordre pour toi. --H2O(talk) 16:52, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Non non, tu as bien fait, merci. --Jamain (talk) 17:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Why

this? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

@Tuvalkin: Because the number of the vehicle is not SJ 9175 but 9175. --H2O(talk) 18:48, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
I create a new category : Category:Vehicle 9175 of the Charleroi metro. --H2O(talk) 18:51, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Why did you create a new category, instead of renaming/moving the existing category? Why didn’t you create a redirect in the bad category name, instead of merely blanking the contents? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Because I do not know how to do this :( --H2O(talk) 19:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Now I see. Thank you ! --H2O(talk) 19:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Asphalte-1 - Huskmitnavn - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent composition, you took photo exactly in the most perfect position. However I cannot deny it has got a perspective problem. --Michielverbeek 20:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 Comment I make a correction of the perspective. Is it better now? --Jmh2o 07:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
It is an improvement, but it is not perfect --Michielverbeek 20:05, 17 July 2016 (UTC)~

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! André Hupet - Charleroi - Palais de Justice - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments At first I was going to say perhaps not sharp enough since I was thinking of normal artwork, but then I saw that they were five stories up on a wall and any building in the vicinity had only three, making this an impossible angle and a very long shot. So good enough for me. Good quality. --W.carter 21:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! André Hupet - Charleroi - Palais de Justice - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality per the other of the pair. --W.carter 21:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alphonse Darville - Le Maître d'œuvre (1953) - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Asphalte-1 - Sozyone - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes, the sky is not at its best, but taking this pic on a sunny day would probalby have ruined the paintings no end with reflections since they are painted on corrugated sheet metal and it's the paintings that are the main objects. Good enough for me.W.carter 11:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 Comment Thanks. I have many pictures of this urban art work (I'm living nearly), but make simple a good picture is realy difficult. And now, there are trees growing in front of it. --Jmh2o 12:46, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Florennes - plaque commémorative aux Jésuites français.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very little supply pixels, but good for me.--Famberhorst 15:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Florennes - Saint-Gengulphe - chevet - inscription de 1755 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Florennes - Saint-Gengulphe - blason de la ville cinquième travée sud - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. W.carter 10:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Florennes communal cimetery - 03 - W. Kwasney.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality now. --Ermell 22:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Namur - Pompe du Marché de l'Ange - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pompe du Marché de l'Ange (Pump on the Angel Square), Cultural heritage monument in Wallonia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Hôtel de ville vue de la place Charles II - 2015-03-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Charleroi - Cultural heritage monument in Charleroi (Wallonia).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Hôtel de Ville - L'administration.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Verum 14:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Hôtel de Ville - La famille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:15, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jmh2o/Archive_1&oldid=254685711"