User talk:Jimmy44

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is, of their own volition, no longer active on Wikimedia Commons.
This is not indicative of breaking any Wikimedia policies.
Babel user information
fr-N Cet utilisateur a pour langue maternelle le français.
en-0 This user has no knowledge of English (or understands it with considerable difficulty).
de-0 Dieser Benutzer beherrscht Deutsch nicht (oder versteht es nur mit beträchtlichen Schwierigkeiten).
Users by language

Parlez-moi ici ! / Talk to me there ! (please in french...)

Archives 2007-2008 Archives 2009-2010

TUSC token e7366f349767ba3995f35f81d60e237d[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Drapeaux Guerre d'Espagne[edit]

Salut! je ne connais pas très bien drapeaux de cette periode, mais le drapeaux sang et or ne fut pas employé de manière generale jusqu'à la mi-XIX. Je te laisse quelques links que je viens de trouver, tu verras que le drapeau des regiments et repetitif, blanc, croix de bourgogne, armoriries royales et le blason de la ville garnison aux 4 bouts de la croix ou cantonnée [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], A+, --SanchoPanzaXXI (talk) 19:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blasons[edit]

Blason fam fr de Savoisy.svg

Je pense que les blasons (comme Blason fam fr de Savoisy.svg) seraient mieux sans le "reflect". Je trouve cette réflexion blanche et transparante dégrade l'image, les couleurs ne sont plus clairs comme ils le seraient sans le couche de reflect. A mon avis le Blason n'a pas l'air plus trois dimensionelle même avec reflect.

En ce qui concerne ce blason: Je pense que les courbes autour du champ diagonal devrait être plus circulaire plutôt que parabolique comme vous les avez dessinez.

Pardonnez mon français - GoogleTranslate m'a aidé, mais c'est peut-être pas parfait :-)

Gregors (talk) 08:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Je dessine les blasons selon l'usage (la norme) établit par le fr:Projet:Blason francophone. Je vous propose d'y donner votre avis sur la page de discussion de ce projet. Cordialement,--Jimmy44 (talk) 09:35, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crown of a Duke of France (Restoration).svg[edit]

Je me suis basée sur les dessins d'un livre Carl-Alexander von Volborth, une traduction en néerlandais. Je vais le retirer du dossier bientôt, et écrire une note de celui-ci sur ​​la page. Adelbrecht (talk) 10:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Hello Jimmy, after seeing this edition of yours, I wonder if you could identify those people in the image by placing a tag/note over them? Thanks, -- Darwin Ahoy! 08:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Darwin, I've hade the name as I've can. All the the names come from the description of the base Joconde (ministère français de la Culture) : Joconde database: entry 000PE004980--Jimmy44 (talk) 12:57, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! Sorry for the trouble, but I don't believe I would be able to identify them as easily.-- Darwin Ahoy! 13:11, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albert Henri de Ligne.jpg[edit]

Je crois qu'il s'agit du mauvais Albert de Ligne, comme expliqué sur la page discussion du fichier File talk:Albert Henri de Ligne.jpg bàt Henxter 20:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi Jimmy! Je ne comprends pas pourquoi vous avez remplacé cette fichier. C'est correct? Salut (et désolé pour mon français). Giro720 (talk) 02:24, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Giro720, j'ai modifié le fichier pour deux raisons :
  1. Sous le Premier Empire l'usage était d'utiliser des écus en "accolade"
  2. J'ai alléger le fichier (en supprimant la toque et les lambrequins ) en ne gardant que l'écu :
⇒ on utilise sur WP.fr un modèle pratique (voir : fr:Modèle:Armoiries avec ornements communs) qui permet de jongler avec les "ornements en communs", les décorations, etc... (voir : fr:Projet:Blasons/Ornements extérieurs#Modèle:Armoiries avec ornements communs)
Cordialement,--Jimmy44 (talk) 02:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ceci est nouveau pour moi... très intéressant. Merci! Giro720 (talk) 04:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bernadotte[edit]

Dunkerqueenflandre m'a dit. N'hésitez pas à rétablir. Adelbrecht (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Vous avez ajouté une mention de violation de droits sur ce fichier, qui est pourtant un dérivé de File:Coat of Arms of the July Monarchy (1831-48).svg. Pouvez-vous m'expliquer ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Yann. Qu'il n'y ait pas de confusion : c'est le fichier svg qui est dérivé du File:Louis-Philippe coa.png, ce dernier est une copie d'écran provenant du site www.heraldique-europeenne.org. Cordialement,--Jimmy44 (talk) 13:24, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notifications aux téléverseurs[edit]

Bonjour, Lors des demandes de suppression, s.v.p. ne pas oublier de placer le modèle subst:copyvionote (ou une note équivalente) sur la page de l'utilisateur qui a téléversé le fichier, tel que requis sur le modèle copyvio notamment. (Par exemple subst:copyvionote|File:Beauvilliers.gif). Certes, ça peut parfois sembler un peu lourd, mais sinon la demande de suppression risque de ne pas aboutir. Ça peut aussi être une indication utile pour les lecteurs subséquents de la page. Merci. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

J'y veillerai à l'avenir.--Jimmy44 (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:20, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Blason William Montagu (2e comte de Salisbury) (version Gelre).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiltpin (talk) 12:51, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove deletion requests[edit]

Bahasa Indonesia  বাংলা  Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

-->here<-- (diff=68440605&oldid=66837491)RE rillke questions? 22:42, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Jimmy44, merci de prendre position sur la page concernée. Et de me tenir au courant, une fois le vote clos, sur ma page de discussion. @+ --Binnette (talk) 09:54, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Père-Lachaise[edit]

Salut,

Je passe faire les photos le week-end prochain. ~Pyb (talk) 15:32, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci de penser à moi Pyb Clin--Jimmy44 (talk) 16:25, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Voilà les photos Category:Grave of Clary's family. La vue panoramique n'est pas parfaite. Faut que je la refasse. ~Pyb (talk) 16:17, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merci du coup de main. --Jimmy44 (talk) 12:29, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Beech_Marten_in_heraldry has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Kiltpin (talk) 15:33, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment créer un blason?[edit]

Salut, contacter car je serais intéressé à créer des armoiries, mais ne savent pas comment. J'ai remarqué qu'elle les crée donc j'ai contacté. Quel programme utiliser pour les obtenir? Où puis-je le télécharger? (Désolé si j'ai fait quelque chose de mal, je sais que le français au niveau de base). --Francescocap96 (talk) 11:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Pigeons in art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


senat[edit]

j'ai fait ce que j'ai pu, par contre pour le république française demande à qqn d'autre je me souvient plus comment on fait. bye. --Chatsam (talk) 17:10, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Drapeau de l'Espagne (1808-1813)[edit]

Salut, Jimmy. D'abord, perdonne-moi pour mon horrible français. Je t'écris parce que je ne suis pas d'acord avec la existence d'un drapeau national espagnol différent pour cette période. Il semble comme s'il fusse uniquement une bannière des régiments napoléoniens de l'Espagne, commo ça: [7], d'époques précédents. Morancio (talk) 19:41, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Blason Bolko III de Munsterberg (selon Gelre).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

De728631 (talk) 20:08, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Blason ville fr La Turballe (Loire-Atlantique).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:20, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Blason François Louis Le Tellier (1704-1767).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Blason François Louis Le Tellier (1704-1767).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 15:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

French Navy officers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Philafrenzy (talk) 07:23, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blason Charles XIII de Suède.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 09:17, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ornements extérieurs Abbés.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

John Ronn talk 09:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orn ext Comte (baron-pair) OSE.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amitie 10g (talk) 07:48, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Delaroche - Assassinat du duc de Guise (Musée Condé).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zoupan (talk) 01:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 16:56, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

faux nom de blasson, correct: Stubenberg. convier corriger, Cordialement

der Name ist falsch, richtig ist Stubenberg, Category:Coats of arms of Stubenberg family, liebe Grüsse --Hannes 24 (talk) 19:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

coats of arms[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blason_ville_fr_Plabennec_(Finist%C3%A8re).svg

Plagiat (talk) 03:23, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'Illustration (3 novembre 1860).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.11.219.67 16:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jacques de Juigné (1874-1951).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jacques de Juigné (1874-1951).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Jimmy44, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Jacques de Juigné (1874-1951).jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 06:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blason Louis Ier de Hongrie.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Eatcha 14:32, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blason Henri Ier de Pologne.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:46, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Claude-Lamoral Ier de Ligne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 06:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orn ext Grand d'Espagne OSE.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cantabrucu (talk) 17:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:Victurnien Bonaventure de Rochechouart de Mortemart.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: private photo - private collection)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2A01:CB08:848A:900:58F3:A76A:EA6E:2432.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 18:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Princess Jeanne de Villeneuve, née Bonaparte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:E0A:26A:FD30:B097:CF15:A8EE:CB2E 23:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diplôme Médaille commémorative de la guerre 1939-1945.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 11:55, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear friends. I am here to ask you about the derivation, origin of this blazon .[edit]

Hello ladies and gentlemens, may I ask you whom belonged the blazon on the duel box, please ? the blazon consists of one crown above two lion’s standing on it’s hind paws and of 3 ermines in the center. this duel box was bought in France. So I suppose that this blazon may be of a noble France family. Kind regards. P.S. I have photos of the box and photos of pistols. My email is Veramaller@mail.ru and my WhatsApp is on the phone 89687797569 46.138.158.109 11:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Léopold Davout (1829-1904).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Emmanuel Dissais (talk) 21:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]