User talk:Jag9889

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jag9889!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:36, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please use sub-categories[edit]

dansk | Deutsch | Österreichisches Deutsch | Schweizer Hochdeutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | svenska | +/−


When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

--Sitacuisses (talk) 18:19, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Simme bridges[edit]

Hallo, most amazing all the bridges you lead me to discover! Thanks for that.

Do you think the following are also about Category:Brücke (Pfaffenried 329, Oberwil im Simmental)?

The bridge of the category is described as having an inclined deck (in the heritage listing), but the two recent photos, yours and the panoramino one from 2010, don't show that.

As I wasn't reasonable sure, I left them in Category:Bridges over the Simme river for now. They have an incredible number of covered bridges. -- Enhancing999 (talk) 08:03, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für Deine Nachricht. M. E. sind die drei Fotos auch von der Pfaffenriedbrücke. Frage mich, ob das Baujahr wirklich 1829 (Denkmalpflege BE) ist. Gemäss Brückeninventar von Werner Stadelmann ist das Baujahr 1899 (http://www.swiss-timber-bridges.ch/detail/618). Gruss Jag9889 (talk) 16:36, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your message. The photos are most likely from the Pfaffenriedbridge. Not sure if the date built of 1829 is correct. Another source (http://www.swiss-timber-bridges.ch/detail/618) states 1899 as the year built. Greetings Jag9889 (talk) 16:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathuusbrüggli über die Innere Aare, Thun BE 20221108-jag9889.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Flachmoorgebiet Seezopf Seematt, Seengen AG 20230526-jag9889.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flachmoorgebiet Seezopf Seematt, Seengen AG 20230526-jag9889.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:06, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which bridge is this?[edit]

Hi, you took a photo of: this bridge ^^^ This bridge of the I-95/NJTP Western spur in 2018, and I recently included it in my new article on the Harry Laderman Bridge (on wikipedia), however I wanted to make sure that this is actually the right bridge (it says you took this in Kearny when the bridge is in Carlstadt, possibly confusing it with a separate bridge). I know it was 5 years ago, but you don’t by any chance remember where this photo was taken, like the exact area? Jason Ingtonn (talk) 03:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jason, took the photo from a kayak on the lower Passaic River. Just click on the camera location of the picture to see the precise location. Jag9889 (talk) 03:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, this helps a lot Jason Ingtonn (talk) 21:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]