User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive11

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
17 Market Square in Radków, exposure from WSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
17 Market Square in Radków, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
17 Market Square in Radków, house mark.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
18 Market Square in Radków, exposure from WSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful -- Christian Ferrer 11:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
18 Market Square in Radków, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
21 Market Square in Radków, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wooden bell tower in Kudowa-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I think that trash can is useless. See the proposed crop. --Halavar (talk) 13:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:00, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good now. All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 15:01, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karłów, Karłów Hotel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 13:38, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mill in Kłodzko, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jan Ziębicki chapel mausoleum in Stary Wielisław.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jan Ziębicki chapel mausoleum in Stary Wielisław, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Market Square in Radków, monument in front of the town hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 15:49, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Way of the Cross in Wambierzyce, chapel of decapitation Saint James.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 15:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:03, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum of Papermaking in Duszniki-Zdrój, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support ok. --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leśna castle in Szczytna, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:48, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leśna castle in Szczytna, main gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:05, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczytna i Góry Stołowe ze Szczytnika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality despite the minor perspective distortions. --Ximonic 14:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Mauzoleum Jana Świdnickiego w Starym Wielisławiu 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 10:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Mauzoleum Jana Świdnickiego w Starym Wielisławiu 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Mauzoleum Jana ziębickiego w Starym Wielisławiu 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Mauzoleum Jana Świdnickiego w Starym Wielisławiu 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum of Papermaking in Duszniki-Zdrój, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum of Papermaking in Duszniki-Zdrój, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Szczytna, exposure from Szczytnik.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015 Góry Złote z Borówkowej.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Góry Złote z Borówkowej.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Góry Złote z Borówkowej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:11, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Mauzoleum Jana Świdnickiego w Starym Wielisławiu 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:05, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Mauzoleum Jana Świdnickiego w Starym Wielisławiu 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:11, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Mauzoleum Jana Świdnickiego w Starym Wielisławiu 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:58, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Mauzoleum Jana Świdnickiego w Starym Wielisławiu 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:58, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Way of the Cross in Wambierzyce, well of Our Lady.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope and usefull -- Christian Ferrer 10:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wiadukt w Lewinie Kłodzkim (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:05, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zamek Leśna w Szczytnej 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zamek Leśna w Szczytnej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Ławeczka Szwejka w Szczytnej.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Ławeczka Zagłoby w Szczytnej.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Szczeliniec Wielki, Stołowe Mountains, Sudetes, Poland, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Captions are too succinct. You should put the name of the region and the country. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:16, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Golden Mountains (Sudetes), Poland, panorama from Borówkowa, exposure from WSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Captions are too succinct. You should put the name of the country. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:33, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saucer magnolia, Magnolia × soulangeana, flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leśna castle in Szczytna, park at the castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Brama Jerozolimska w Wambierzycach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:52, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Drewniana dzwonnica w Kudowie-Zdroju 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A pity that there are some branches in front of the spire, but anyway QI. --Cccefalon 09:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Fort Karola w Górach Stołowych 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Fort Karola w Górach Stołowych 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Fort Karola w Górach Stołowych 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 10:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Szczeliniec Wielki, Stołowe Mountains, Sudetes, Poland, sandstone formation on the hilltop.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Overpass in Lewin Kłodzki, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Szczytna, bench with the Josef Švejk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Nice photo covering all the monument instead. -- Jarash (talk) 16:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Szczytna, bench with the Jan Zagłoba.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- Christian Ferrer 17:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, side portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 09:29, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful --Llez (talk) 09:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, central stucco.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

There are many stuccos on this house, so the scope is not specific enough.--Jebulon (talk) 21:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:56, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support a special scope for only one stucco ? --Jebulon (talk) 20:49, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Pasterce 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Fort Karola w Górach Stołowych 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Fort Karola w Górach Stołowych 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Hotel Karłów w Karłowie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, house mark.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, bay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, windows and stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
32 Czeska Street in Kłodzko, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
20 Okrzei Street in Kłodzko, windows and stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Słodowa Street in Lądek-Zdrój, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful -- Christian Ferrer 11:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Słodowa Street in Lądek-Zdrój, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Jaszkowa Górna, exposure from SSE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 22:54, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Wielisławska, młyn 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Wielisławska, dom młynarza i piekarnia 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Wielisławska, młyn 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Jaszkowa Górna, gatehouse, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment In description we can read (in both languages) that this is a church. Please change description to proper one. --Halavar (talk) 13:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 09:41, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Jaszkowa Górna, gatehouse, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- Christian Ferrer 04:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Droszków, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, roadside chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Jaszkowa Górna, exposure from ENE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Orłowiec, outbulding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Holy Trinity Column in Lądek-Zdrój, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question Are you sure it's from east? After looking at Goggle streetmaps I think it's from north. --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

You're right, I was wrong, exposure is from N. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:02, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

 Support Now support from me. --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

CAs 2015 Kolumna Maryjna w Radkowie 05.jpg

Hello! Sorry, I really don't like to upload images made by other authors. I tried to help to improve your image 2015 Kolumna Maryjna w Radkowie 05.jpg. It's was just a small fix with LR6. If you don't like this version, please delete it. Otherwise tell me. So I can promote your image as QI. Sorry for uploading an image and replacing your image. --XRay ^talk 04:51, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Papiernia w Dusznikach-Zdroju 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Papiernia w Dusznikach-Zdroju 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Otoczenie papierni w Dusznikach-Zdroju 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:50, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Park przy zamku Leśna w Szczytnej.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Obelisk Przeszłości 1870-1945 w Radkowie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:32, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Jaszkowa Górna, outbuilding, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Orłowiec, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Orłowiec, barn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station in Lądek-Zdrój, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station in Lądek-Zdrój, exposure from WNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Nicholas in Radochów, altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 12:56, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczytna, ul. Wolności 7 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczeliniec Wielki 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualiy.--ArildV 07:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Park w Wolanach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zamek Leśna w Szczytnej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rothenhof Manor house in Trzebieszowice, retaining wall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint John the Baptist in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żelazno palace, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 13:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żelazno palace, outbuilding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:38, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, pawilon wejściowy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left side a bit blurry, but main subject just ok --Poco a poco 08:12, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, pawilon wejściowy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo -- George Chernilevsky 07:39, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szkielet niedźwiedzia jaskiniowego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:20, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oppersdorfe's palace park in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, the first pavilion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oppersdorfe's palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, outbuilding, former stable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żelazno palace park, bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
41 Słodowa Street in Lądek-Zdrój, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 13:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:16, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
41 Słodowa Street in Lądek-Zdrój, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:06, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Barbara in Lądek-Zdrój, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Barbara in Lądek-Zdrój, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:07, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station in Lądek-Zdrój, outbuilding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support ok. --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 10 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 11 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 11 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 12 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szkielet niedźwiedzia jaskiniowego 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would have gone further, but ok --Poco a poco 09:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kolumna Maryjna w Radkowie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check for CAs at the church tower.--XRay 06:06, 30 May 2015 (UTC) CommentThis is not the CA but coma aberration in the picture up to the light and it can not be improved.--Jacek Halicki 10:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC) Good quality now. --XRay 03:43, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żelazno palace park, miniature park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crystal Glass Factory "Violetta" in Stronie Śląskie, the oldest building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Nowy Gierałtów, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Elise in Stronie Śląskie, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 15:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Elise in Stronie Śląskie, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 15:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Onuphrius chapel in Stronie Śląskie, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 20:46, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szkielet niedźwiedzia jaskiniowego 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, pawilon wejściowy 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Would love to see more categories though. --MB-one 14:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczeliniec Wielki 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tilted little bit CW. See the note. --Halavar 07:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 20:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 10:25, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Obelisk Przeszłości 1870-1945 w Radkowie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail --Daniel Case 18:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Christ's Resurrection Church in Stronie Śląskie, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Christ's Resurrection Church in Stronie Śląskie, votive pole.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Catherine of Alexandria church in Kąty Bystrzyckie, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Lost church in Karpno, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 20:58, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Lost church in Karpno, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 20:59, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Lost church in Karpno, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015 Góry Złote z Borówkowej 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Góry Złote z Borówkowej 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Normandy polish war memorial

Hi Jacek,

Thanks for support in VIC. Of course this photograph was taken thinking of you, and is especially dedicated to you !--Jebulon (talk) 22:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Zmartwychwstania Pańskiego w Stroniu Śląskim 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Zmartwychwstania Pańskiego w Stroniu Śląskim 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Matki Bożej od Zagubionych w Karpnie 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Matki Bożej od Zagubionych w Karpnie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO too birght or too less contrast. What do you think?--XRay 17:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)  Support Checked again. --XRay 18:48, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church in Janowa Góra, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Sebastian church in Orłowiec, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żelazno palace, portico.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żelazno palace, side entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bear Cave in Kletno, Sudetes, Poland, ursus spelaeus, skeleton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:10, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Budynek nadleśnictwa w Strachocinie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:10, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:53, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bear Cave in Kletno, Sudetes, Poland, entrance pavilion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żelazno palace, side portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żelazno palace, dovecote behind the palace.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żelazno palace, palace annex.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bear Cave in Kletno (Lower Silesia, Poland), bat sunk in calcite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Tłumaczów, gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support BIS -- Christian Ferrer 17:39, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:01, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Michael the Archangel church in Sienna, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of Sorrows chapel in Wolany, stained glass window with John Paul II‎.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:01, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory in Przyłęk, outbuilding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Palauenc05 (talk) 21:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:03, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko. ul. Zagórze, kościół Macierzyństwa NMP 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko. ul. Zagórze, kościół Macierzyństwa NMP 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Wiosenna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 14:42, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko. ul. Zagórze 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Budynek nadleśnictwa w Strachocinie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments tilted cw --Cccefalon 07:52, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 13:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Budynek nadleśnictwa w Strachocinie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 13:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC) At the left. A car mirror (propably). --C messier 13:48, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 19:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 08:16, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dworzec PKP w Lądku-Zdroju 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:39, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dworzec PKP w Lądku-Zdroju 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dworzec PKP w Lądku-Zdroju 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 07:40, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Zmartwychwstania Pańskiego w Stroniu Śląskim 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 23:14, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szkielet niedźwiedzia jaskiniowego 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 10 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 09:09, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Archangel Michael in Stary Gierałtów, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Anne in Przyłęk, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bear Cave in Kletno (Lower Silesia, Poland), natural entrance to the cave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Water mill in Byczeń, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. Shows the whole building --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:42, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:24, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko. ul. Zagórze 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:29, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Pileckiego 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:29, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko. ul. Spółdzielcza 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:22, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko. ul. Korczaka 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:22, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko. ul. Zagórze, kościół Macierzyństwa NMP 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:34, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bear Cave in Kletno, Sudetes, Poland, stalactites.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Very little specific. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand you. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

• It is very difficult to recognize an underground cavity on an image. This picture could have been taken in another cavity.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

  I still do not understand what the problem is. The same pattern of stalactites is theoretically possible, but statistically very unlikely. The picture is well described and has the correct current location. And besides, the criteria for VI has nothing to do about the specifics of images. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:21, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

  In this case we can make several thousands of photographs potentielement VI in one cave. Try to keep a sense of the Label. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

 Support I see the point of Archaeodontosaurus, but considering the good description and the quality of the picture I tend to support it. --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:53, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Abbey, first glasshouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Abbey, second glasshouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maternity of the Blessed Virgin Mary Church in Kłodzko, portal and crucifixion group.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maternity of the Blessed Virgin Mary Church in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Jaszkowej Górnej 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Palauenc05 16:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Jaszkowej Górnej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:53, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dworzec PKP w Lądku-Zdroju 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Orłowcu 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Abbey, granary, exposure from WSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Abbey, granary, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Abbey, outbuilding, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Catherine in Ożary, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:08, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Maternus in Sosnowa, gatehouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Llez (talk) 10:38, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 12 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 12 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 12 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 12 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 14 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Orłowcu 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:39, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Maternus in Sosnowa, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Llez (talk) 10:39, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:55, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Bartholomew's Church in Topola, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:56, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bear Cave in Kletno (Lower Silesia, Poland), stalagnates.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope imo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Abbey, outbuilding, exposure from NNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Abbey, outbuilding, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Catherine in Ożary, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Mary Magdalene in Tarnów, side entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Best in scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:42, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:19, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
17 Kościuszki Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie, stucco.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:52, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support BIS -- Christian Ferrer 04:44, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:21, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:52, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:21, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 14 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:21, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 14 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:21, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 17 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:58, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 17 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:46, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 17 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. It´s a pity, that nobody is aware of such constructional sins. --Hubertl 09:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality. --C messier 08:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Maternus in Sosnowa, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Maternus in Sosnowa, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Bartholomew's Church in Topola, wall around the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:16, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:16, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Disgusting , but good quality! --Uoaei1 14:39, 10 June 2015 (UTC)... Question Disgusting ? You don't like mushrooms ?? --~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 15 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 15 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:12, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Ząbkowice Śląskie, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gołębia Tower in Ząbkowice Śląskie, timber framing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:36, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
21 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie, windows and stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:36, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
26 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful -- Christian Ferrer 04:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:38, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
27 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
30 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:33, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
31 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Bgag (talk) 21:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:39, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 18 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --ArildV 15:19, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 18 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 18 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Optimist4343 09:02, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 18 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:07, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, ul. Kościelna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:55, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie, windows and stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:30, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie, windows and stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:30, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
32 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:31, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
47 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support BIS -- Christian Ferrer 04:33, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gym in Ząbkowice Śląskie, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support good -- Christian Ferrer 11:50, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jewish cemetery in Ziębice, funeral chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:28, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 13.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 13.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Browar w Radkowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:23, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 25 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:10, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 25 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:10, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 26 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 26 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 13:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1st school building in Ząbkowice Śląskie, side entrance for people with mobility impairment.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:34, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gym in Ząbkowice Śląskie, side entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church in Ziębice, side portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Lutheran church in Ziębice, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former parish school in Ziębice, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:14, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 3 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 22:34, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 3 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 3 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:01, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Lutheran church in Ziębice, side entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Lutheran church in Ziębice, porch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Synagogue in Ziębice, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ziębice Town Hall, coats of arms of Ziębice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 21:32, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 4 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 4 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but some more cats are welcome --Poco a poco 08:49, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 4 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 6 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:49, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 6 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:51, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ziębice Town Hall, side gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former parish school in Ziębice, exposure from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Kościelna Street in Ziębice, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church in Kamienica, wooden belfry, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:19, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:49, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczytna, ul. Wolności 7 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:51, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Jaszkowej Górnej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:51, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szkielet niedźwiedzia jaskiniowego 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:45, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 5 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:55, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 5 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 5 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Fort Karola w Górach Stołowych 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 13:17, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Fort Karola w Górach Stołowych 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 3 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right side slightly leaning out, elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 07:32, 14 June 2015 (UTC)@Cccefalon:  Done --Jacek Halicki 11:39, 14 June 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Orłowcu 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:53, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka przydrożna w Przecławiu 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:08, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka przydrożna w Przecławiu 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:38, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka przydrożna w Przecławiu 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 19:33, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka przydrożna w Przecławiu 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Villa Barbara w Lądku-Zdroju 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:40, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Villa Barbara w Lądku-Zdroju 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:40, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Villa Barbara w Lądku-Zdroju 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:31, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Villa Elise w Stroniu Śląskim 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:26, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Villa Elise w Stroniu Śląskim 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please see my annotation. --Cccefalon 09:25, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 „Chata Cyborga” w Bielicach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:19, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Willa Skalniak w Stójkowie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:01, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Willa Skalniak w Stójkowie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:01, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kapliczka przydrożna w Droszkowie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Johann Jaritz 11:26, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica św. Onufrego w Stroniu Śląskim 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:27, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica św. Onufrego w Stroniu Śląskim 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:27, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Huta Szkła Kryształowego 'Violetta' w Stroniu Śląskim.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't mind the cut-off chimney and the car..QI to me. --Cayambe 19:41, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015 Browar w Radkowie.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Browar w Radkowie.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Lądku-Zdroju 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Lądku-Zdroju 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Lądku-Zdroju 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:48, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej w Kątach Bystrzyckich 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej w Kątach Bystrzyckich 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:30, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wita Stwosza Street in Kłodzko, exposure at dawn from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:21, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Market Square in Ziębice, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buildings in Radków, brewery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
9 Market Square in Ziębice, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Market Square in Ziębice, windows and stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Market Square in Ziębice, gable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
20 Market Square in Ziębice, windows and stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
31 Market Square in Ziębice, cartouche.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful -- Christian Ferrer 11:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Evangelist church in Paczków, side portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church in Kamienica, penitential cross.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope -- Christian Ferrer 11:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church in Kamienica, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paczków Town Hall, side portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Not really wild about the quality, but it is clearly the best in the given scope. --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:21, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Market Square in Paczków, lion sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
17 Market Square in Paczków, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
31 Market Square in Paczków, gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
36 Market Square in Paczków, gable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:39, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
39 Market Square in Paczków, windows and stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
43 Market Square in Paczków, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:43, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of All Saints in Stary Paczków, relief over side entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of All Saints in Stary Paczków, crucifix at the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Nicholas and Francis Xavier church in Otmuchów, Maria column at the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Nicholas and Francis Xavier church in Otmuchów, statue of Saint Peter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Nicholas and Francis Xavier church in Otmuchów, statue of Saint Paul.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Otmuchów Castle, memorial of Wilhelm von Humboldt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Otmuchów Castle, arcades.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Otmuchów, memorial of Jakub von Salza.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Otmuchów Castle, John of Nepomuk sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Annunciation in Nysa, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Holy Cross in Nysa, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:27, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Holy Cross in Nysa, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:28, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Holy Cross in Nysa, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Przecław, tower bell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Przecław, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Only other image that focuses on the belfry is in shadows --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:26, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Przecław, pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:09, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Przecław, statue of Saint Peter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:57, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wita Stwosza Street in Kłodzko, exposure at dawn from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:21, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Market Square in Paczków, lion sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
31 Market Square in Paczków, gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Holy Cross in Nysa, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:28, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:47, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Nowym Gierałtowie 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:57, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Jaszkowej Górnej 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:43, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Jaszkowej Górnej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Jaszkowej Górnej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:35, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wita Stwosza Street in Kłodzko, exposure at dawn from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:21, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Market Square in Paczków, lion sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
31 Market Square in Paczków, gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Holy Cross in Nysa, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:28, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Przecław, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Przecław, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roadside chapel in Przecław, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Nowym Gierałtowie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Jaszkowej Górnej 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:52, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Jaszkowej Górnej 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 10:18, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Radochowie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:06, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Przecław, mosaic over main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Przecław, sacristy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Przecław, side entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Przecław, altars.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roadside chapel in Przecław, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (But the car bottom left is disturbing.) --XRay 16:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Wałowa 3-5 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 098.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Leśniczówka w Karpnie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roadside chapel in Przecław, plate with water during the flood in 1934.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Support: 1 Oppose: 1 Neutral: 0 promoted Ezarateesteban 22:26, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oppersdorfe's park and palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Support: 1 Oppose: 0 Neutral: 0 promoted Ezarateesteban 22:27, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, aerial exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Support: 1 Oppose: 0 Neutral: 0 promoted --Ezarateesteban 22:28, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roadside chapel in Przecław, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Support: 1 Oppose: 0 Neutral: 0 promoted Ezarateesteban 22:29, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Przecław, statue of Saint Paul.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Support: 1 Oppose: 0 Neutral: 0 Ezarateesteban 22:31, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower at the church of saints James and Agnes in Nysa, aerial exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 0509, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Support: 1 Oppose: 0 Neutral: 0 promoted --Ezarateesteban 22:33, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 26.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 26.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zgromadzenie Sióstr św. Elżbiety w Nysie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zgromadzenie Sióstr św. Elżbiety w Nysie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 11:44, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zgromadzenie Sióstr św. Elżbiety w Nysie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Jebulon 10:13, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół dworu biskupiego, ul. Lompy 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Radochowie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 11:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower at the church of saints James and Agnes in Nysa, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:58, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:59, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:37, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower at the church of saints James and Agnes in Nysa, pinnacle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower at the church of saints James and Agnes in Nysa, blind tracery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, statue of St. John of Nepomuk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City Scales House in Nysa, gable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:12, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City Scales House in Nysa, side entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Convent of Saint Elizabeth in Nysa, exposure from NNE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support nice and useful --Ezarateesteban 22:22, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Convent of Saint Elizabeth in Nysa, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support nice and useful --Ezarateesteban 22:23, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Convent of Saint Elizabeth in Nysa, Maria Merkert memorial.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --El Grafo (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bracka Street in Nysa, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:37, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Zgromadzenie Sióstr św. Elżbiety w Nysie 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Zgromadzenie Sióstr św. Elżbiety w Nysie 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Sebastiana w Orłowcu 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but only the image. Let's hope that there is money to restore this beautiful church. -- Spurzem 10:27, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół w Janowej Górze 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 09:03, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół w Janowej Górze 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac w Ołdrzychowicach 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Radochowie 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:55, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół dworu biskupiego, ul. Lompy 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Palauenc05 08:56, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac w Żelaźnie, park 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac w Żelaźnie, park 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac w Żelaźnie, park 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac w Żelaźnie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół w Janowej Górze 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Palauenc05 08:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, statue of St. John of Nepomuk, putti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:38, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Barbara church in Nysa, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:38, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the assumption of Holy Virgin Mary in Nysa, cartouche with the motto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:38, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Jesuit Monastery in Nysa, window with grating.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Jesuit Monastery in Nysa, window with putto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Jesuit Monastery in Nysa, side entrance and stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wrocławska Gate in Nysa, aerial exposure from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support copmosition-wise, I'd prefer File:2014 Nysa, Brama Wrocławska 07.JPG, but this one is much sharper. --El Grafo (talk) 15:28, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
16 Bracka Street in Nysa, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bishops manor in Nysa, Sebastian von Rostock coat of arms.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 23 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kryta pływalnia w Kłodzku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:32, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szkoła Podstawowa nr 3 w Kłodzku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Moroder 20:31, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szkoła Podstawowa nr 3 w Kłodzku 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:31, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Jaszkowej Górnej 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Seems to be leaning to the right a little bit. --Code 10:18, 23 June 2015 (UTC)@:Code Done --Jacek Halicki 12:23, 23 June 2015 (UTC)Good quality, better now --Hubertl 16:57, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wrocławska Gate in Nysa, portal on the north-east wall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ziębicka Gate in Nysa, aerial exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Jadwiga Bastion in Nysa, southern part.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City Scales House in Nysa, window with grating.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:18, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City Scales House in Nysa, attic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:18, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 25 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit CAs but good quality. --Laitche 12:52, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 25 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 12:57, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 26 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 26 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:52, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 26 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:52, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 23 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 18:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Jadwiga Bastion in Nysa, northern part.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City Scales House in Nysa, Nicholas II of Niemodlin plague.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment currently fails criterion 6 ("well categorized"): Category:Plagues in Nysa is red and I think a category for Nicholas II of Niemodlin would be very useful as well. --El Grafo (talk) 15:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Done I corrected category. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:13, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
• Took me a while to figure out that this is the same person as Category:Nicholas II of Opole. Added that Cat,
•  Support now. --El Grafo (talk) 08:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, sculpure of Saint Joseph over main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, pinnacle over main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, Wenceslaus II of Legnica tombstone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 11:08, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Convent of Saint Elizabeth in Nysa, Elisabeth of Hungary sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 11:09, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Słodowa 41 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Słodowa 41 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac w Oldrzychowicach Kłodzkich, park przy pałacu 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:31, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac w Oldrzychowicach Kłodzkich, stajnia 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac w Oldrzychowicach Kłodzkich, stajnia 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:31, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Triton Fountain in Nysa, upper part with sculptures.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2/4 Bracka Street in Nysa, 4 Bracka Street, gable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Bracka Street in Nysa, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 Market Square in Nysa, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Market Square in Nysa, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support registered monument, which should be sufficient for Scope#Buildings, all other criteria met as well. --El Grafo (talk) 15:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Nysa, parish office building facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support registered monument, which should be sufficient for Scope#Buildings, all other criteria met as well. --El Grafo (talk) 15:12, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Sebastiana w Orłowcu 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Poland is a beautiful country. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:59, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Sebastiana w Orłowcu 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Łysiec, Sudety 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice mountain. QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 05:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Latarnia uliczna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Progressive technology.Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac w Żelaźnie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Bracka Street in Nysa, gable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Bracka Street in Nysa, portal and windows of the ground floor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Grodzka Street in Nysa, courtyard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Jaszkowa Górna, chapel at the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support better than File:2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Jaszkowej Górnej 06.JPG, more complete view of the chapel. --Ezarateesteban 00:42, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Koniunkcja Jowisza i Wenus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:31, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Czerwoniak 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:53, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Korczaka 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:26, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Korczaka, sygnalizator świetlny.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:26, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Dusznicka, myjnia samochodowa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 08:51, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Bracka Street in Nysa, front entrance and windows of the ground floor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Grodzka Street in Nysa, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Grodzka Street in Nysa, house mark.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Pileckiego 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:07, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa, ciepłownia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:07, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Dusznicka, myjnia samochodowa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:38, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac w Żelaźnie 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:41, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac w Żelaźnie 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:08, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szkoła Podstawowa nr 3 w Kłodzku 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yeaa, well on the right, but its really irrelevant --Moroder 16:08, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Katedralny Square in Nysa, relief Saint Anne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Market Square in Nysa, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3/5 Wałowa Street in Nysa, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 7 July 2015 (UTC)