User talk:ImperialArchivesRU

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ImperialArchivesRU!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:1976ImperialWedding2.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:1976ImperialWedding2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:1976ImperialWedding2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:59, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:1976ImperialWedding1.jpg[edit]

File:1976ImperialWedding1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Crown Princess Leonida3.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:04, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/10/Category:Princess Margarita of Romania[edit]

Thank you for contributing to the COM:CFD process. I however, have reverted the changes you made on Oct 3 to Category:Princess Margaria of Romania and closed the extra discussion you opened about it at Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/10/Category:Princess Margarita of Romania. Opening multiple CfDs in short order for the same category is not needed. Making changes to categories prior to closure of the CfD is not permitted. Please refrain from making significant changes, including blanking, redirecting, moving all of the content, or major re-categorization/de-categorization, until the CfD is closed with consensus to make changes. Your contributions to improving Commons categories are welcome as is your participation in COM:CFD. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Josh (talk) 22:14, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Joshbaumgartner: The reason for having had remade another discussion was because there was no response to the initial discussion which I had made for the change of the name of Category:Princess Margarita of Romania to be renamed as ‘Margareta of Romania’ due to no such individual named ‘Princess Margarita of Romania’ existing, though the one being referred to has since her birth in 1949, known as ‘Princess Margareta of Romania’ until 1997 whereupon she was titled ‘Crown Princess Margareta of Romania’ and at present since 2017 ‘Margareta of Romania’ which her Wikipedia page is also named as. ImperialArchivesRU (talk) 15:42, 09 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Palace Knights.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel: As you may find throughout many of the Wikimedia Commons’ Categories of many honours, there are hundreds of thousands of images of individuals of no notability with any sort of honour yet these images are still on Wikipedia; these images I have taken and uploaded are relevant to their categories and articles due to there being no media of the orders categorised within the files.ImperialArchivesRU (talk) 22:36, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel: I also find there no necessity for the deletion of the following files: File:Two Sicilian Members.jpg, File:Crown Princess with Delegates.jpg, File:Two Sicilian and Tongan Royal Couples.jpg, File:Constantinian Group Photograph.jpg, File:Constantinian Delegate Group Photo.jpg, File:Constantinian Investiture Members.jpg and File:The Princess Royal with a KCOC.jpg considering most if not all in the photographs are of notability including heads of states and Royals of whom there are rarely any media on wikimedia commons and their relevance to the categories attached. ImperialArchivesRU (talk) 22:36, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Princess Lilian of Sweden[edit]

Hello! This move was not necessary and your assertion that she was "not a Swedish princess" is definitely incorrect as per official, published Swedish government records. Unnecessary category moves are not appropriate. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SergeWoodzing: Princess Lilian was a Princess of Sweden by marriage only, however she was never a Swedish Princess of which there is a distinction between the former and latter. Her full title was Princess Lilian, The Duchess of Halland which is also the title page of her English Wikipedia Page, I don’t see it being an unnecessary category rename considering it’s a change to conform to standards of an individuals higehst or most prominent title. ImperialArchivesRU (talk) 15:04, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Such nonsense! The higher title is of course being a prince of princess of a country, not a duke or duchess of a province. Lilian was married to a prince of Sweden. When they were married she was elevated to "Royal Highness" and a princess of Sweden. How could not be, married to him? The Royal Court of Sweden always referred to her as "Her Royal Highness". One can only be a "Royal Highness" of country. I'm sorry for being quite irritated, but you are making things up (fantasy input) as you go along. That really screws us up. Please stop it! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 08:06, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Category:Princess Margaretha, The Mrs. Ambler"[edit]

Another unnecessary move. And that title - "The"?! - is not at all correct for her. Please do not make any more category moves that could be considered controversial and/or need discussion. We are supposed to nominate such moves for consensus before they are done. Or at least start a discussion on the category's talk page. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:29, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You who did this seem to be ignoring the garbage created, not fixing it. Hard to see any good faith in that. See and use the image talk page if you'd like to try to justify this nonsense. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 08:11, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming of categories and files[edit]

Dear ImperialArchivesRU, You are sometimes moving, renaming, splitting up or deleting categories without looking at the consequences. Two examples. !) There are several guys who are named Prince Felix (of Denmark, Luxembourg, Sumarokov-Ėl'ston, Schwarzenberg, Bourbon-Parma etc.). Therefore, it is a bit strange to construct a category like Category:Prince Felix in 1951. This apart from the fact that it is a bit odd to further divide a category containing only 33 images. 2) Sometimes you delete categories without leaving re-directs, e.g. Category:Xavier, Duke of Parma. That's not very handy when these categories still have Wiki-links pointing to them, see c:Special:WhatLinksHere/Category:Xavier,_Duke_of_Parma. So I would like to ask you: could you please be a bit more reluctant when wanting to rename or delete categories? Please first think about the consequences, and act accordingly. Or first start a discussion on the Talk page of a category. Vysotsky (talk) 21:42, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Addition: as I dive a bit deeper into this case, I see that your actions are really creating a mess. See Category:Prince_Carlos_Hugo,_Hereditary_Duke_of_Parma and look at the three red links in the Wikidata Infobox on the right. I guess you don't realise that you are creating these red links, and are effectively destroying many internal constructions in the Wiki building. Please stop doing so: stop deleting, moving and renaming categories. Vysotsky (talk) 21:59, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vysotsky: Hello, I would first of all like to apologise for any frustration caused for having not met with the guidelines prior to renaming/deleting categories, as I had considered the steps I was taking are pretty basic and quick; In regards to your first example 1) of the extra category of Prince Felix, that category was categorised within the main category of the individual as well as having created that particular category because it was of a series of photos from one event in 1951, which is evidently less of a hassle to identify or group together when all in a single category along with other images from different periods of time as well as the individual formerly being Prince Felix of Bourbon-Parma, his great-grandson who is a Prince Felix of Luxembourg was not born until 33 years after the date of that category, Prince Felix of Denmark was born 51 years after the date of that category, Count Felix Sumarokov-Ėl'ston (who was never a Prince) had died 74 years before the date of that category, his son Prince Felix Felixovich, Prince of Yusupov had died 23 years before the date of that category, his own son also named Prince Felix Felixovich, The 8th Prince Yusupov has died 1967, obviously alive in 1951 though if there were to be a category of the same year, it should be named as Prince Felix Felixovich in 1951 considering Felixovich was part of his name and then also Prince Felix of Schwarzenberg who died in 1852, a whole century later the date of the category, neither of those Felix’s mentioned would be applicable for ‘Prince Felix in 1951’; 2) all of the deleted categories have redirects to the new names category for the individual if you see the Category, ‘Prince Felix of Bourbon-Parma’ which mentions it has been moved to ‘Prince Felix, Prince Consort of Luxembourg’; Most of all discussions started on talk pages are left dormant after my request has been put through due to their being no response.Most of all of the Infoboxes which not only have incorrect information but also wrong names and titles were already a mess, when trying to link them to the new named pages, it does not work so I would expect that someone could help by rectifying that by updating it to the renamed category. ImperialArchivesRU (talk) 14:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for being Dutch blunt, but you really don't seem to grasp the consequences of the changes that you are making in the names of categories. 23 language versions of Wikipedia name Prince Felix as follows: Prince Felix of Bourbon-Parma. Be so kind to follow the link to the English Wikipedia article, and then click on Wikimedia Commons in the left column. You will then not be guided (with a re-direct) to "your" renamed Category:Prince Felix, Prince Consort of Luxembourg. I think you shouldn't have renamed this category at all, but in any case: you shouldn't have renamed this category without investigation of the consequences and only after consultation of others, preferably on the talk page of the category. I also checked one file in the Category:Prince Felix in 1951. That photograph was made in 1956, not in 1951. So not only is the name of this category unclear, but it also contains an image that doesn't belong here. I kindly aks you to change your way of working here. Vysotsky (talk) 15:12, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Please look at the two preceding entries here. The ridiculous invention "The Mrs. Ambler" - NOTE: "The"!!! - must be fixed. Unnecessary category moves should never (never) be made. If we dicuss before moving, we end up in much better shape. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 08:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Hello ImperialArchivesRU, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Order of the Eagle of Georgia 01.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

File:Order of the Eagle of Georgia 02.jpg

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 09:45, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Astrid_of_Belgium[edit]

Astrid of Belgium has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Tm (talk) 17:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove warnings[edit]

català ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello. This is a reminder for you that it is important to address the identified issues instead of simply removing legitimate warnings and notices from your talk page. Removing messages does not remove them from the talk page's history. You are encouraged instead to archive past discussions according to our community guidelines. You can have this done automatically for you -- simply place {{subst:User:Jeff G./usertalksetup}} or {{subst:autoarchive resolved section/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and then old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details). If you have received warnings for copyright issues, please familiarize yourself with our policy on licensing. You can also ask for help at the village pump or the help desk if you need assistance.

--Sealle (talk) 19:30, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Knights Grand Cross of the Order of Leopold I (Belgium)[edit]

PLEASE, please....DELETE this nosense asap.--Carolus (talk) 09:19, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked[edit]

Blocked Indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you. A CheckUser has confirmed the abuse of multiple accounts. You have been blocked from editing indefinitely for this reason.

azərbaycanca ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ kurdî ∙ la .lojban. ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Green Giant (talk) 01:59, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:ImperialArchivesRU

Contents

File tagging File:1976ImperialWedding2.jpg[edit]

File:1976ImperialWedding1.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/10/Category:Princess Margarita of Romania[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Category:Princess Lilian of Sweden[edit]

"Category:Princess Margaretha, The Mrs. Ambler"[edit]

Renaming of categories and files[edit]

Deleted content[edit]

Category:Astrid_of_Belgium[edit]

Please do not remove warnings[edit]

Category:Knights Grand Cross of the Order of Leopold I (Belgium)[edit]

Indefinitely blocked[edit]

Navigation menu

User talk:ImperialArchivesRU

File tagging File:1976ImperialWedding2.jpg[edit]

File:1976ImperialWedding1.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/10/Category:Princess Margarita of Romania[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Category:Princess Lilian of Sweden[edit]

"Category:Princess Margaretha, The Mrs. Ambler"[edit]

Renaming of categories and files[edit]

Deleted content[edit]

Category:Astrid_of_Belgium[edit]

Please do not remove warnings[edit]

Category:Knights Grand Cross of the Order of Leopold I (Belgium)[edit]

Indefinitely blocked[edit]

Navigation menu

Search