User talk:Immanuel Giel/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Kaiserlsautern Hoefle-Poppel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Basvb (talk) 09:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Kath. Kirche Freimersheim

Hallo Immanuel, bei den Kulturdenkmälern von Freimersheim fand ich eine Kategorie Corpus_Christi_Church_(Freimersheim,_Pfalz). Allerdings stellen die drei Bilder vom 1.4.2012 nicht die katholische Kirche in Freimersheim dar. (Die ist ein Sandsteinquaderbau!) Die dargestellte Kirche muss aber im näheren Umkreis liegen, denn die Bilder wurden etwa eine halbe Stunde nach den anderen Fotos von Freimersheim aufgenommen. Gruß Rudolf Wild 07:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)RuWild

File:Ueberfuehrung der Kurfuerstin Dorothea nach Heidelberg 14 Juni 1580 aus Thesaurus Pictuarum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Gaudeamus igitur

Hi, Immanuel Giel, I was wondering why you named the file Gaudeamus Igelkur whereas the inscription clearly reads Gaudeamus igitur ? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 07:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

It is a joke by the German author Karl May:
Gaudeamus, Igelkur,
Juvenal kaut Humus!
Gaugamela, Inventur,
Pflaumenboom ist Prunus.
It is just nonsense. Should it be renamed? --Immanuel Giel (talk) 11:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
No need to rename since it is a duplicate. Lotje (talk) 16:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Kastenhof.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Schlosshof Glaeserner Saalbau Ottheinrichsbau Heidelberg von Louis Hoffmeister ca 1820.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:38, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

14:22, 1 February 2006 upload of the atomium

Hello, do you still have this file? Please consider reuploading it to File:AtomiumInnen.jpg if you do and I will restore the history. It has been permanently deleted before the software update it seems. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 07:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

File:Wilhelm-Hack-Museum 14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Carl Ha (talk) 19:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Immanuel, ist diese Tafel draußen angebracht bzw. konntest du das Foto von öffentlichem Grund aus aufnehmen? --Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Ja, von der Straße aus. Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 08:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Countries and places has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Novarupta (talk) 22:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Speyer Federle-Salathe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 14:42, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

File:We believe in the monster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 12:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Coin postcard.

Hello, my name is Don. I saw that you uploaded a picture of a postcard from around 1900 with various Qing Dynasty coins on them, I used this image in the Wikipedia article “Qing dynasty coinage” and was wondering if you had more of these postcards, if yes, would you please publish all of them? They could really be used on many other Wikipedia articles of different early 20th century coinages.

I believe that the image name was "Waeheungen ca 1900".

Sent from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (talk)

You may reply to me in German if you so wish 🌠, I can understand and speak it, just can't write it. 😅 --Donald Trung (talk) 13:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Maneki neko Germersheim 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 20:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

BASF Fahrradparkplatz Bilder

Hallo, ich möchte anfragen ob wir dein Bild (siehe link unten) für unser Buchprojekt CAR GO BIKE BOOM nutzen könnten? Es könnte uns als Anschauungsbeispiel für Werksräder dienen. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ludwigshafen_BASF_Fahrradparkplatz.jpg Wir wollen es auch unter einer ähnlichen (CC) Lizenz publizieren, es kann jedoch sein, dass wir nicht die gleiche Lizenz nutzen können, je nach Verlag. Bitte um Rückmeldung hier oder per email an cargobikeboom /ät/ morgenlab.net Vielen Dank! Epic (talk) 20:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Geht in Ordnung. Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 18:43, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:Karmeliterkirche Mainz 04.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: artist died in 2017, no fop
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:23, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Karmeliterkirche Mainz 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Immanuel, von wem ist das Glasfenster gestaltet worden und von wann stammt es ungefähr? (du weißt schon dass im Innenraum keine Panoramafreiheit gilt) --Túrelio (talk) 10:30, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Ist wohl unvermeidbar. Laut de:Konkordienkirche_(Mannheim)#Kunst ist Karl Rödel (gest. 1982) der Glaskünstler. --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Category:Tummler has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ermell (talk) 20:46, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Immanuel Giel, ich hab mal versucht die Kategorien der Leinleiterquelle und des oberhalb liegenden Trockentals zu ordnen. Du hattest da fleißig dran gearbeitet und sehr informative und gute Bilder hochgeladen. Ich hab noch wenige hinzugefügt und hoffe das es so ungefähr passt. Gruß aus Bamberg von Reinhold Möller --Ermell (talk) 20:57, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Immanuel, da die Büste offensichtlich im Haus steht, greift die Panoramafreiheit hier nicht. Wer ist der Bildhauer bzw. ist sein/ihr Urheberrecht schon abgelaufen? --Túrelio (talk) 07:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Daran dachte ich nicht. Also, weg damit! Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 07:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Zufall bei Wasserturm

Haha, sehen. Du hast Fotografie um ca. halb 4 gemacht. Ich 5 Stunden später. Zwiadowca 21 09:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Dein Bild ist schöner. Gruß. Immanuel Giel (talk) 11:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


Hallo Immanuel, das Foto ist leider grenzwertig wegen des Wandgemäldes, da es in Indien überhaupt keine FoP für 2-dim. Werke gibt. Da du ja in der Schule warst, könntest du die Schule nicht um eine Genehmigungsmail bitten? --Túrelio (talk) 06:54, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Das dauert baer ein bisschen. Geht das? Gruß. Immanuel Giel (talk) 06:56, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Ja, klar. Sobald du die Mail abgeschickt hast, pappe {{OTRS pending}} auf das Bild. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Bitte löschen. Ich komme nicht dazu, das zu regeln. So wichtig ist das Bild auch wieder nicht. Gruß. Immanuel Giel (talk) 10:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Copyright?

Guten Tag!

Wir würden gerne das folgende Bild für ein Handout zum Trainieren und Informieren von Landwirten zum Thema Biodiversität verwenden.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wilder_Wein_im_Herbst.jpg

Ihr Name zusammen mit der CC Lizenz und dem oben genannten Link wird im Bilderverzeichnis aufgeführt werden (sortiert nach Seitenzahl und Bilder Reihenfolgen).

Es wäre schön wenn Sie mich kurz wissen lassen könnten ob sie mit der Verwendung Ihres Bildes einverstanden sind.

Viele Grüße Ulrike Harant — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uharant (talk • contribs) 06:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Null Problemo. Sie brauchen mich auch gar nicht unbedingt zu nennen. Gruß. Immanuel Giel (talk) 07:53, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Vielen lieben Dank! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uharant (talk • contribs) 11:36, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Wunderschöne Mahjong-Steine

Hallo Immanuel!

Hoffentlich verstosse ich hiermit nicht gegen Wikipedia-Regeln, aber ich muss dich einfach fragen. Wo kann man diese Steine beziehen? Schon lange suche ich diesen Set, am besten noch mit arabischen Ziffern, kann sie aber nirgends finden. Sollte ich tatsächlich gegen WP-Regeln verstossen, dann lösche bitte diesen Eintrag einfach. Auf alle Fälle vielen Dank für deine Mühe. Honeybal (talk) 14:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Honeybal. Dieses Set habe ich vor langer, langer Zeit in einem Chinaladen in Hamburg gekauft. Ich glaube aber, dass auch gut sortierte Spielwarenläden in anderen großen Städten mindestens ein Mahjong-Set im Sortiment haben. Auch bei Tante Amazon gibt es das Spiel zu kaufen. Einen halben Hunderter wirst du aber schon anlegen müssen. Hilft dir das weiter? Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 14:13, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Hallo Immanuel. Endlich habe ich dich wieder gefunden, hatte doch vergessen einen Link zu sichern. Leider ist dieser Satz nicht so einfach zu finden - 3-farbig mit arabischen Ziffern für Holzboards (nicht frei stehend). Aber ich werde die Suche nicht aufgeben. Auch mein Freund, bei dem ich diesen Satz gesehen habe, hat diesen vor vielen, vielen Jahren in USA in einem Chinaladen gekauft :) Danke noch einmal für deine Mühe.

Honeybal

Pay attention to copyright
File:Mural in Metz 02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No COM:FOP in France, permission from artist needed.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:44, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mural in Metz 05.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mural in Metz 05.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:45, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Delete. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 07:37, 5 October 2018 (UTC)