User talk:Illegitimate Barrister/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

JFK files

Aloha! I noticed you started to upload the new JFK files. Are you continuing? There are a few more @ [1] ;-). Only a few thousand.... Cheers! C(_) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

@Hedwig in Washington: There's way too many for me to upload on my own as the Commons only lets you upload 50 at a time and there's thousands of files to upload, so I put in a batch upload request. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 00:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
You can up that to 500 files. Jarekt figured that out:

# go to this stage using Chrome browser

  1. open java script console with Ctrl + Shift + J
  2. paste "mw.UploadWizard.config.maxUploads = 500;"
  3. now if you open an album or a photostream with up to 500 images you can upload them all at once
    — Jarekt
Anywho, thanks for your fast reply! I completely forgot to check the batch upload pages. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
@Hedwig in Washington: Thanks for the tip. Unfortunately the download links seem to be very slow for me at the moment; I'll try again in a few minutes. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 01:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
I guess I will stop since I am upload conflicting with you. Artix Kreiger (talk) 03:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
@Artix Kreiger: Keep uploading. I'm only uploading the July release files at the moment so you can go ahead and upload the rest of the October release files instead. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 03:51, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
@Artix Kreiger: Great, problem solved! You still need to keep an eye on the batch upload and let'em know when your done. 6k files is fun. See you next year! ;-) Oh, and you have to read every document then add categories and a full description! :-P0:) Just kidding --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
@Hedwig in Washington: The July uploads have all been finished. Now just got to wait on @Artix Kreiger: to finish with the October release batch, if he hasn't already. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 04:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
still have about 2,000 to go. Artix Kreiger (talk) 13:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
@Artix Kreiger: Duly noted. Make haste, sire! – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 14:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Finished Artix Kreiger (talk) 15:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

New release of JFK files

Hey, do you want to upload or? Artix Kreiger (talk) 03:08, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

You have the link? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 03:14, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Here. Artix Kreiger (talk) 04:45, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Have the November 3 files been uploaded? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 12:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Nah. I didn't upload them. I was wondering if you did. Artix Kreiger (talk) 12:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
How about I upload November 3 and you upload November 9? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 12:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Sure. Dang 13,000 files. Wanna do half and I do half? or actually I will file a bot request for that. Artix Kreiger (talk) 12:49, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Is a bot request usually quick? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 12:55, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
er sorry about that. I had archiver turned on (meant for me) but I accidentely clicked that instead of "edit". And its still in the workds at Commons:Bots/Requests/Artix Kreiger Bot 2 Artix Kreiger (talk) 13:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Okay, I'll upload November 3 manually and you can have the bot do the November 9 release. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 13:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

November 3 has been completed. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 03:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
As suggested by @Hedwig in Washington: (A wonderful admin btw), I will give them better titles before I upload them. Artix Kreiger (talk) 14:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:South African soldiers at the Roodewal Weapons Range in May 2013 (8724689015).jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Leoboudv (talk) 09:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)


Question

How did you mass rename the JFK files to "X name (November 3rd release)"? Artix Kreiger (talk) 16:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

@Artix Kreiger: Download "Advanced Renamer" here. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 22:24, 17 November 2017 (UTC)


Say...

What's the deal with this flag? Are its colours really authentic? In use up 'til 2003? Director (talk) 01:52, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

IIRC, the exact colors of the Italian flag were not specified until 2003. In 2003, the exact shades were specified and those shades were used until 2006, when the colors were again changed to their present shades. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 02:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
I understand that, but where'd you get the colours on File:Flag of Italy (1946-2003).svg? Are they based on something, or..?
Are they perhaps, for some reason, the best we can do for the unspecified period? I ask because, if so, I'd like to apply them to the flags of the Kingdom as well. And the Italian Social Republic. Director (talk) 02:33, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Theoretically they could be any shade of green or red since they were unspecified; I picked those colors since they were the ones I found on the very oldest SVG here. You could also try the CIA World Factbook's shades from 2000 here. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 02:38, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

U.S. area comparison maps from CIA website

Hi! This well done already. :)--Dim Grits (talk) 21:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Odd, I never got a duplicate file warning when uploading them. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 21:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)


Not USA

Hi, is it really necessary or helpful to change Wikimedia file names so they follow Wikipedia's WP:NOTUSA article guideline - changing USA to U.S., when US is what the guideline actually suggests for most cases? Using multiple .'s in a file name is not permitted in many file systems, though apparently it's OK in Wikimedia. Unnecessary name changes create mismatches between original copies and the Wikimedia copies. I've uploaded hundreds of files over the years with 'USA' in the file names, and sometimes re-upload new versions of them. If you feel you must or should continue, then please use either 'US' or 'United States' when renaming, rather than U.S. I've started using the full name in my latest uploads. Thanks, Brian W. Schaller (talk) 05:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

No need to worry, moving the file creates a redirect that redirects the old filename to the new one as if it were never moved at all. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 05:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


JFK files

I was uploading files through User:Artix Kreiger 2, (alt account). I think Im finished. Artix Kreiger (talk) 16:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

That's good, glad to hear! – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 16:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
actually, a little more. my bad. Artix Kreiger (talk) 16:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Oh. Let me know when you finish! – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 16:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

I finished the December 15 batch. Artix Kreiger (talk) 19:52, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

just to make sure we're on the same page. you uploaded November 3rd, but not the 9th and 17th? Artix Kreiger (talk) 20:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
I honestly don't remember. I upload a lot of files. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 20:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Im uploading November 9th and November 17. There are 22,000 files (approximately) and I'll let you know when I finish (in a few hours). Artix Kreiger (talk) 16:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Alright. Commons has a mechanism that alerts you if you upload a file that's already been uploaded. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 18:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Finish!!! Artix Kreiger (talk) 19:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Glad to hear it. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 01:38, 6 January 2018 (UTC)


Copyright status: File:US Army 344th Tactical PSYOP Co Flash.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:US Army 344th Tactical PSYOP Co Flash.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:US Army 37th Eng BN Flash.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:US Army 37th Eng BN Flash.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:US Army 648th Regional Support Group DUI.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:US Army 648th Regional Support Group DUI.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:US Army 738th Engineer Co Flash.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:US Army 738th Engineer Co Flash.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Sherman Oaks Elementary school photo 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Noggin Del Fuego II.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)


Ink Spots

Hello. (new to wikis, sorry if this is the wrong place to post such messages).

You've uploaded a recording of "If I Didn't Care" by The Ink Spots to wikimedia -- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:If_I_Didn%27t_Care_(1939),_by_The_Ink_Spots.oga It is stated on the file's page that this recording is in public domain since the copyright holder failed to renew the copyright. However, UMG lists this song on their website and says that it is distributed by them. Have you conducted research about the copyright status of the recording? I would like to use this recording in a project of mine, but it must have no copyright issues. I would be very grateful if you could tell me how to reproduce your research and determine whether this recording is indeed in the public domain. ~ Maknvl (talk) 16:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

To be honest, I'm probably the wrong person to ask. You're better off asking somebody more knowledgeable in this stuff. Here's the U.S. Copyright Office records which can be searched. For what it's worth, the Ink Spots stuff on YouTube haven't been taken down for copyright as far as I know like other more recent songs have. Not the end all be all, but it's something. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 04:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

One click archiver

Have you considered using 1ca? you just click "Archive" for 1 section and it archives to your archive. all you need to do now is to install the source code at User:Artix Kreiger/common.js to special:MyPage/common.js. Artix Kreiger (talk) 05:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Wow, that is helpful. Thanks! – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 05:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Kirsten E. Gillibrand, 1984.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ivar the Boneful (talk) 04:08, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Logo of Bionicle.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

File renaming of ribbons

Howdy. Just as an FYI I use the ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 for the first part of the file name of the ribbon bars that I create at least when there doesn't seem to be a consensus on naming them. EricSerge (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Okay, noted. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 19:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Gaithersburg police car, 1980s.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 11:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Gaithersburg police car, 1960s.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 11:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Gaithersburg police car, 1970s.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 11:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Former national anthem of Afghanistan, 1973-1978.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

CA flag licensing cleanup

Hi Illegitimate Barrister. Thank you for helping to straighen out the licensing of the various California city flags uploaded by Dylantus. File:Flag of Bellflower, California.gif was just uploaded by a different editor. Is this one also OK to convert to "PD-CAGov"? -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Yup. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 14:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

military awards

The standard way we had awards was Award Name (Country). It woukdcbe good to keep that standardized format. Thanks! Semper Fi! 2600:387:B:5:0:0:0:A1 02:44, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

No need to add the country if it's the only award of its name. The country name should only be done if there's multiple awards from different nations with the same name. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 02:45, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Awards

The format of Award Name (Country) is a good format. I will move them back. If you want to change, please discuss on the cat talk page for consensus. Thank you. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 03:23, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Seal of Porterville, California.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:MattShirk.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MattShirk.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MattShirk.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:26, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:CA - Compton Police.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:CA - Compton Police.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:24, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

File:FloridaLotteryLogoOld.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Glenn Dumke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

File:GlenSpringsPoolHouse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Harold Hume portrait c 1940.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

File:John J Tigert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Patch of the California State University Police.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Charles Millican portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Charles Young c 2001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:06, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Fdotcar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked your account for two weeks. You've been warned many times to not upload content which violates copyright, and what our standards are. File:Patch of the California State University Police.png is a bad faith attempt to avoid Commons:Deletion requests/File:Patch of the California State University Police.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:01, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "How is it an attempt to avoid? I added a link to the PNG version on the page of the JPG version, out of good faith. I wouldn't have done that if I was attempting to be sneaky, or in your words, "avoid" a DR in bad faith. Now, as for the block summary, it says I added files without sourcing and was warned over this. As for the first allegation, uploading without source, I was never formally warned about it, but I did go back and in good faith, added sources to any files that were missing them when it was pointed out to me that they were missing a source. The vast majority of these files are in the public domain anyway. As for the second allegation, warnings, I don't recall ever getting one from you or anyone else regarding this matter in this year, or even one in all of last year, making the second reason erroneous and completely false, not to mention premature and unnecessary. Since I did not get any warnings over this (just check my talk page history and archive), all of this makes this block completely out of the blue. The pertinent Wikimedia Commons guidelines regarding this, Commons:BLOCK, states that "Clear explanations and warnings about Commons policy should be engaged in before [...] blocking a user for license problems." Neither warnings nor a discussion about the matter have occurred in the case of this block, which makes it completely premature, out of the blue, and in violation of the pertinent Commons guidelines. Again, just go back and check my talk page history and archive and you'll see no warnings were given to me about this matter in the immediate past. Since there was no warning ever given in the immediate run up to, and case of, this block, it is unnecessary and uncalled for. If you were worried about my behavior regarding this, you could've have come and talked to me in my talk page and I would've tried to address your concerns the best I could instead of jumping the gun and immediately going to a block. You did not even give me one warning about this either, whether in this year or even in all of last year. Therefore, the right thing to do in this case would be to unblock me immediately as I have work to contribute. Regards, – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 05:43, 6 April 2018 (UTC)"
Unblock reason: "Upon further reflection, I handled this quite poorly, and I am very sorry. I was much too quick to block. I still believe you should take more care, but I will also take more care in the future to assume good faith and get a second opinion. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)"
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  suomi  हिन्दी  македонски  русский  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

You know, if you could admit any wrongdoing, I might unblock you. But you can't; it's all lawyering and deflection. Textbook w:WP:GAB issues.
When I blocked your account, I looked over your talk page history, and I found two separate DRs over the subject on just the first page. That makes three times, including my own DR. Administrators are not stupid; they can read that history too, and no one will unblock you if you continue to maintain otherwise. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:54, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:Flag of Bienville Parish, Louisiana.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This is a file from reddit with no indication of a free license.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SpanishSnake (talk • contribs) 05:08, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

It's a faithful 2D derivative file of a work under Creative Commons licensing. That is, assuming the original uploader, @Dragon Lil Brad: , is the original copyright holder. You'll have to ask him since he was the one that uploaded the file originally under the Creative Commons license. Regards, – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 05:36, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Flags of Wayne County, Michigan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Xeror (talk) 10:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Flag of Los Angeles County, California.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xeror (talk) 13:34, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Copyright violations

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


Hello Illegitimate Barrister.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:07, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

File:FlAlexanderSpring.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Flowers in the United States has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 17:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Dutch anthem

Hello, as you might know it's Kingsday today in the Netherlands. I went to the English Wikipedia and listened to the anthem by the US navy band, noticing that it was played much too fast. On the file page I found out that there is a version with the correct (or in any case much better, this one) tempo, but as attempted to revert to this version, it seems it doesn't alter the tempo. I come to you because you made a .wav file out of the original file that is used on the English Wikipedia? Could you perhaps modify or reupload the .wav / .ogg file so that it has the correct tempo? I assure you it is no joke, a quick youtube search will show that it really is too fast. Thank you very much in advance! IJzerhouwer (talk) 18:49, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Tempo sounds fine to me. Either way, Commons frowns upon artificially changing music file tempos. We'd have to find and upload one that is performed at the tempo you desire. As for the revert not working, you probably have to clear your cache and purge the page before listening. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 19:28, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
File:FBI and Security Preparations for Super Bowl LII (January 2018).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FallingGravity (talk) 05:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

NIST 911

Hi, I'm taking a look at Commons:Batch_uploading#NIST_FOIA_9/11_videos, thinking about testing out a generic upload. However the copyright looks dubious to me. On Youtube the standard YT license applies and though there is a reference to the "crowdsourced" website 911datasets.org, it is unclear why the files uploaded there are credibly public domain.

Could you explain why you think we can be confident about releasing these as PD on Commons? Thanks -- (talk) 16:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

You're right. Until it can be verified, hold off for now. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 01:05, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Okay, please ping me if you feel more confident about their status later on. -- (talk) 11:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Flag-map of the world.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

75.67.58.188 00:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:Counties_in_the_Americas has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 10:03, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Coat of arms of South Africa.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Underlying lk (talk) 03:29, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Charles Robert Jenkins.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

fourthords | =Λ= | 18:59, 21 May 2018 (UTC)


File:Flag of the South African National Party (1993–1997).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:38, 28 May 2018 (UTC)


File:BocaCitySeal.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Flag of China (1928–1949).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Champion (Talk) 23:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Thai flag colours

Hi. I started a talk page discussion regarding the colours of the historical Thai flag versions at File talk:Flag of Thailand (1939–2017).svg. Would you please contribute to the discussion rather than reverting without any explanation? Thanks. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Would you be so kind to communicate in advance such movings that impact thousand of templates in lots of chapters, please? -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:31, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Charles Millican portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 14:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag of the UNIA.svg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of the UNIA.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Tiến Quân Ca.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)


File:Russia Military Power Report (2017).pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:56, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Seal of Lanare, California.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of South Africa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:55, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Baba Yetu performed by the United States Navy Band in 2015.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chess (talk) 03:59, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

File moving guidelines

Please review the file renaming guidelines before moving any more files. In particular, changing hyphens to dashes is rather useless and can actually make file usage more difficult. The hyphen is on most keyboards, while the em- and en-dashes are not. "Files should NOT be renamed only because the new name looks a bit better."

There can also be some technical problems caused by renaming files, as noted at the Village Pump. Guanaco (talk) 06:33, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Images, page moving

[2] This caused many problems on Wikipedia pages that contain flags which names you have changed. Can you fix that? --MateoKatanaCRO (talk) 14:30, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing this to my attention; I'll try. Can you give me some more details to help? What exactly is the issue, template or redirect? Also note that the file has since been moved again, after I moved it. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 16:05, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Charles Robert Jenkins.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

fourthords | =Λ= | 20:15, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Illegitimate Barrister,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

File:National Anthem of Togo by US Navy Band.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:21, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

File:National anthem of Cape Verde.wav has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Flag of Thailand (2011–2017).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paul_012 (talk) 02:31, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

what is the reason for file moving guidelines ?

Hello I ask to you, ¿why do you change the hypens (-) for dashes (–)? It makes very difficult to use the files, mostly because no keyboard has that typography.

Thank you.--Shadowxfox (talk) 15:40, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia's style guide prefers to have the longer hyphen between two years. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 15:57, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, but in commons that's not true. --Shadowxfox (talk) 03:14, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

File moving against the policy

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at File talk:Naval Ensign of China.svg. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:35, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

File:CPL Richard Arvine Overton, USA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Эlcobbola talk 09:54, 19 August 2018 (UTC)


Pay attention to copyright
File:Flag of the African Union (free).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: unrecognizable
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Flag of the African Union (free).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:25, 10 September 2018 (UTC)


Photographs of

Hi, We don't create categories with "Photographs of" on Commons. Technically, almost everything on Commons is a photograph (except sounds and drawings, even videos could be considered as photographs), so we would have millions of categories "Photographs of X" with exactly the same content as category X. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:27, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

BTW, I don't think this is a valid reason to rename a file. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Category:JPG vehicle registration plates of Maryland

Hi, What does mean JPG here? Regards, Yann (talk) 06:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Means the file is in JPG format. See Category:PNG flags of Sweden and Category:PNG flags of Denmark as examples of similar categories. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 06:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, What does mean JPG here? Regards, Yann (talk) 06:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Means the file is in JPG format. See Category:PNG flags of Sweden and Category:PNG flags of Denmark as examples of similar categories. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 06:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
IMO, this is useless. I don't care if you add this category, but do not remove the other one. IMO you are wasting your time. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:46, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

endash vs emdash

We need to come to an agreement on whether dates for file names should use an endash or emdash. Right now there is a lack of uniformity and we have both taken our own paths. I use an endash because that is the version included on standard QWERTY keyboards. Is there a reason you have a preference for the emdash? Fry1989 eh? 17:42, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

I use endash too, that is Unless I'm mistaken. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 17:58, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Several of your renames have changed the endash to an emdash, such as [3] and [4]. Fry1989 eh? 19:43, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Well, the reason I did that was because on Wikipedia, they prefer to have between two years. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs),
File:Railroad Tracks in Gaithersburg, Maryland (1984), by Jack Toomey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)


Template:Idw/layout Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 18:03, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Current state of Union of South African flag

I do not think the current purple(!?) colours should be used compared to the previous dark blue version. The CMYK values given are even incorrect as the values for "solway blue" produces a bright green instead of a blue! Further, they look very different to how the flag is depicted anywhere else... Including the example image given above the CMYK values by the south african vexillogical institute itself!! That example, by the way, also closely matches the previous and common depicition. http://www.savaflags.org.za/spec/South%20Africa%20-%20National%201928-1994%20-%20sheet%201.pdf I thnk the dark blue, normal colours should be restored instead of this unusual purple. If the recommended (not official) CMYK values were to be followed, it should also be green not blue, according to the current source.

--213.89.118.82 23:31, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Alrighty then. If you revert it back, I will not object. Reason I reverted was because the reverters gave no reason for their doing so. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 11:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Need your advice

Greetings! I am continuing cleaning and organising Finnish Air Force categories. Next on my list is to nominate to delete this file , because it is just a duplicate of this file. I know that I have to replace these files in global Wiki before nomination, but there is a problem. Some people is Spanish Wiki using it as their personal signature, and I cannot edit is. Please, advice what to do. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 01:01, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Well, they're not exact duplicates. In any event, you can request one be deleted and that a redirect be created to the other file in its place. That way the signatures won't be affected. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 08:49, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

#invoke:Autotranslate IagoQnsi (talk) 20:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Please do not overwrite files

#invoke:Autotranslate Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:30, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

What? – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 05:17, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Template:Clear

Template:Autotranslate MikePollan ([[User talk:MikePollan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:11, 25 November 2018 (UTC)


Hi Barrister, I was wondering if you know the name of the font of the green text in this file? LissanX ([[User talk:LissanX|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:54, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Some sort of Kufic script, maybe. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 04:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Nazi flag name change

Hi, I saw u changed the name of the Nazi German flag which is fine, but hundreds of uses of it across the wiki is now errors! Is this just because this is a new change that is not fully updated everywhere? Because where it says Flag of German Reich (1935-1945).svg (without flagicon etc) its an error instead. Will this fix itself or has this change brought a lot of problems!? --Havsjö ([[User talk:Havsjö|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, sorry about the mixup. It should be fixed now as far as English Wikipedia is concerned. When a file is moved, a redirect is created to the new file so there shouldn't be any problems. FWIW, it shows up just fine for me. Try incognito mode on your browser or clearing your cache and cookies and see if that helps if there's still problems. Cheers! – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 01:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)


Template:Autotranslate D. Benjamin Miller ([[User talk:D. Benjamin Miller|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Template:Clear

Template:Autotranslate 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:8028:D191:C43A:EE28 17:54, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Template:Clear

Template:Autotranslate Huntster (t @ c) 03:59, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Template:Clear

Template:Autotranslate Huntster (t @ c) 03:59, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Macropedia ([[User talk:Macropedia|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:15, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Template:Clear

Template:Autotranslate 社会我佩奇 ([[User talk:社会我佩奇|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:47, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Template:Clear

Template:Autotranslate 社会我佩奇 ([[User talk:社会我佩奇|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:49, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, please check the deletion request page for your image(s) uploaded per PD-VietnamGov minhhuy (talk) 03:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)


Template:Autotranslate Habitator terrae 🌍 16:09, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:06, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Template:Clear

Taking care with transfers

Good evening.

When making transfers from Wikipedia, could you please take care to clean up the upload data? The default text by the bots is often insufficient.

For example, this image,

  • Its description is actually the source.
  • Is not "own work by original uploader".
  • Original upload date is irrelevant.
  • It is not PD-US-no notice.
  • The page has no categories, nor is it even marked as uncategorized.

Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

I see we've talked about this several times now. Is there something that seems unclear or unreasonable about my request? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Template:Clear

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)


Template:Autotranslate 2601:647:101:D030:C963:ECA1:655C:9244 03:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Miniapolis 13:43, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Naval jack of the United States.svg

At an absolute minimum, you need to provide a link to the filename where the snake flag is now. AnonMoos ([[User talk:AnonMoos|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

I told you that you should explain things. There probably would have been less turmoil if you had done so... AnonMoos ([[User talk:AnonMoos|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:39, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
I did, though not soon enough it seems. Serves me right for assuming everybody else knew the rules. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 02:28, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate EugeneZelenko ([[User talk:EugeneZelenko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:41, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 大诺史 ([[User talk:大诺史|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:27, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Svgalbertian ([[User talk:Svgalbertian|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)


Former flag of Iran

Dear Illegitimate Barrister, recently you moved "File:Flag of Iran with standardized lion and sun.svg" to "File:State flag of Iran (1964-1980).svg". In my opinion, the new file name is misleading. The modern drawing of lion and sun just used in the late 1970's. Unfortunately, the timing of standardization of flag of Iran in wikipedia is not correct and in 1964 there was no change in this flag. This misleading information comes from here. In this website, it is mentioned "From the chronology, the change from 1:3 to 4:7 proportions most probably occurred ca. 1964". However, according to the Iranian governmental regulations, the ratio of flag of Iran was determined 2:3 in 1935 and 4:7 in 1958. Unfortunately, this mistake is also seen in the flagicon and flagcountry template of Iran and I do not know how to correct these templates. Shfarshid ([[User talk:Shfarshid|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:41, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

I've moved it per your objections. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 00:27, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Thank you Shfarshid ([[User talk:Shfarshid|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:44, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 95.45.245.174 20:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

New Jersey state flag

I have reverted your change of the flag from May. Despite the supposed use of US Army buff, in practice no NJ state flag actually uses that shade. Even the state website on state symbols (seen here shows a distinctly more yellow color. The reverted to version is correct and should not be changed, despite the difference from the supposed written standard, which has never been followed. (Life long NJ resident and former public employee.) oknazevad ([[User talk:Oknazevad|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:08, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping I have to object to the revert because I feel we should use what the actual regulations on paper say, as that is what is official. If you want, you can upload a different version using the lighter shade (such as under the name File:Flag of New Jersey (de facto).svg). – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 01:05, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Clear

What is this category for? mr.choppers (talk)-en- 20:17, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Exactly what it says on the tin. JPEGs of MD license plates. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 00:36, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Clear

Template:Autotranslate Magnolia677 ([[User talk:Magnolia677|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

I tagged it too soon! Sorry about that. Magnolia677 ([[User talk:Magnolia677|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:29, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Quoi? – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 16:13, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Clear

File:USSConstitution Ship Seal 2017.jpg

This is one of the few non-transparent ship emblems of active USN ships. Notifying you because you have created most of the png versions of ship emblems.--Kges1901 ([[User talk:Kges1901|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:44, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Done. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 06:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Clear

Template:Autotranslate

sourced to image that has since been deleted as copyvio BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Clear

Edit Summary

When editing a page on Commons there is a small field labeled "Edit Summary" or "Summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the Edit Summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the Edit Summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's name in the Edit Summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Quoi? – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 18:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)