User talk:Ies/Archive 2018-2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bitte von Lupus in Saxonia - Führe "Diskuss" auf deutscher Seite bei "Commomos in "Deutsch"![edit]

Es ist nur "Fair" eine "Diskuss" auf einer in "Deutsch" verfassten Seite in - "Deutscher Sprache" - zu führen! - Gerne unterhalte ich mit mit dir dir auch weiter in - " "росси́йский - Russich" - "Altgriechisch" - oder Latein! - Liebe Grüße vom --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 21:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Lupus in Saxonia, offensichtlich kennst Du Dich hier bei Commons überhaupt noch nicht aus. Erst einmal gibt es hier keine "deutschen Seiten". Commons ist nicht irgendwie ein Anhängsel der deutschen Wikipedia, sondern eine eigenständige, internationale Datenbank der Wikimedia Foundation für Bild- und Tondateien. Siehe de:Wikimedia_Commons. Wegen des internationalen Publikums ist die hier allgemein verwendete Sprache Englisch. So sind Kategorien (mit der Ausnahme von Eigennamen) grundsätzlich in englischer Sprache zu erstellen. Siehe Commons:Categories. Commons ist eine Mediendatenbank, nicht aber ein Platz zur Erstellung von Artikel. Siehe Commons:Project scope. Da Du aber Kategorien in deutscher Sprache mit deutschsprachigen Artikeltexten erstellt hattest, verstieß das gegen mehrere hier geltenden Regeln. Das war der Grund, warum ich diese Kategorien zur Diskussion gestellt hatte. Das funktioniert (für Benutzer ab einer bestimmten Anzahl von Edits) mittels einer Automatik "auf Knopfdruck", die auch automatisch eine Benachrichtigung auf der Diskussionsseite des Kategorieerzeugers erstellt. Diese Benachrichtigung ist, wie hier eben üblich, in englischer Sprache. Du siehst: Die drei Benachrichtigungen auf deiner Diskussionsseite sind nicht unfair von mir auf Englisch erstellt worden, sondern eine bei Commons ganz normale Reaktion auf Deine Regelverstöße. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 06:42, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aquilegia atrata-3204copia.jpg[edit]

whether possible I can substitute the file with another that certainly is high quality! Valerio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valerio tarone (talk • contribs) 08:36, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That would be nice. -- Ies (talk) 11:39, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Euforbia meloformis[edit]

Hallo Ies,

danke für den Hinweis. Ich bin kein Botaniker, habe mich auf die dortige Beschreibung verlassen. Wie müsste man diese Hybride denn korrekt beschreiben? Besten Dank im Voraus! --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:29, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jatropha curcas2 henning.jpg[edit]

File:Jatropha curcas2 henning.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

clpo13(talk) 23:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Removal[edit]

Hello, One of my images of a LEGO set and box were removed because of copyright. I'm assuming this is because LEGO boxes are not allowed to be uploaded because they are not public domain? I just want to make sure what the rules are as another image I uploaded of just the set was allowed to stay, and I don't want to inadvertently upload more copyrighted or not public domain material. Thanks, Fritzmann2002 (talk) 16:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fritzmann2002, thank you for asking. The delition request was due to a copyrighted Lego packaging visible in two of your images. For further information see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter and particularly COM:PACKAGING. Compare to Category:Packaging. There is no restriction regarding images of Lego bricks and objects built from Lego bricks. See Category:Lego. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 20:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the response, I'll be careful not to upload any images with the packaging in them in the future! Regards, Fritzmann2002 (talk) 20:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shark Bait 'Please Guy - (Single)' Cover.jpg[edit]

Hi Les... Im confused.
I fully understand that this is album artwork, but its my bands album. therefore we own the rights to use this image however we like surely? please clarify how we should go about uploading these kinds of images properly.
Thanks, deebo4t — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deebo4T (talk • contribs) 14:39, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


edit: please get back to asap so I can resolve this issue. I created the original image myself on photoshop so any help you can give me would be greatly appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deebo4T (talk • contribs) 15:04, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi deebo4T, please use the Open-source Ticket Request System (Commons:OTRS) to solve that problem. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 15:15, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


terribly sorry, I was hoping for a little more information than that... what exactly should I be doing once I've followed that link? I know and i'm with bands/artists who add pages and artworks regularly with ease and ZERO disruption. I'm looking for genuine assistance from you getting this issue fixed. regards, Deebo4t

Logiotis[edit]

Hi, why have you nominate for deletion and not speedydelete?--Felipe da Fonseca (talk) 13:32, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Felipe da Fonseca, because admins asked me to nominate for deletion and not speedydelete in similar cases. -- Ies (talk) 13:36, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am trying to learn how thinks work here, do you know why they asked that?--Felipe da Fonseca (talk) 13:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No idea, I didn't get an explanation. -- Ies (talk) 14:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Please do not delete my case[edit]

Hello Please do not delete my casesDaneshvapooyesh (talk) 13:56, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daneshvapooyesh, I personally don't delete anything. I only made a delition request for some of your images because they either look out of project scope or are obviously NOT your "own work". If you disagree, feel free to join the certain delition discussions. Convince the admins that after you uploaded copyvios again and again and again in the current case everything is fine. -- Ies (talk) 14:13, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bilddateien Daughters-of-Africa und Margaret Busby[edit]

Hallo Ies! Ich hätte erst schauen sollen, wer Ies ist! Ich habe versucht, deine Hinweise entsprechend zu bearbeiten, ich denke mit einer Lizenz des Rechteinhabers sollte man auf der sicheren Seite sein. Darf ich mich künftig bei Fragen der Lizensierung von Bilddatein an dich wenden? Das Urheberrecht ist ja ein Minenfeld, und wenn ich es richtig sehe, sind die Rechtsgrundlagen in den verschiedenen Ländern auch unterschiedlich. (Ich sehe immer wieder Scans von Buchumschlägen, die wohl im angelsächsischen Raum erstellt wurden.) Gruß aus der Pfalz --Fritzober (talk) 09:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bild Haus der Romantik[edit]

Sehr geehrter Ies,

wir würden gerne folgendes Bild auf unserer neuen Internetseite verwenden: File:Marburg_-_Markt_19_ies.jpg

Leider haben wir nicht die Möglichkeit den Lizenzhinweis direkt unterhalb des Bildes zu platzieren.

Bitte kontaktieren Sie mich per Mail, dann zeige ich Ihnen gerne eine mögliche Variante.

Vielen Dank!

Stefanie Kramer, Hotel Marburger Hof, s.kraemer@marburgerhof.de — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarburgerHof (talk • contribs) 12:01, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright?[edit]

Dear author,

we would like to use following pictures for a biodiversity handout to train and inform farmers about biodiversity:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ribes_uva-crispa4_ies.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schurenbachhalde_11_ies.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rhamnus_frangula_04_ies.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Galium_aparine3_ies.jpg

My question is therefore whether you authored these pictures (it says Frank Vincentz) and if so, whether you are fine with us using them for the described purpose?

Your name along with the link to the original source as well as the creative common license will be named in the picture index (sorted by page number and picture order).

It would be great if you could let me know whether this is fine with you or not!

Many thanks in advance!

Kind regards, Ulrike Harant

Crop[edit]

Hello.You can crop yourself using CropTool.Thank you ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 06:52, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

La Palma[edit]

Vielen Dank für die zahlreichen und guten Fotos von La Palma, die ich in w:frr:La Palma und den Gemeindeseiten eingesetzt habe. --Murma174 (talk) 15:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ships built at Jansen Werft, Leer[edit]

Is there a special reason why you renamed the category? Have a look at Category:Ships by shipyard and you will see that moost categories have the name of the place where the yard is situated in the categoryname. I see no reason to rename. --Stunteltje (talk) 19:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stunteltje, I used the name "Jansen-Werft" acc. to the German Wikipedia article. The former "Jansen Werft" was misspelled acc. to German spelling rules. See Category:Leerzeichen in Komposita. -- Ies (talk)
I cannot find the connection. But nevertheless: Most categories have the name of the place where the yard is situated in the categoryname, why did yoy remove the placename? Even in the right spelled category-name the place where the yard is situated can be added. In my opimion the category has to be Category:Ships built at Jansen-Werft, Leer--Stunteltje (talk) 20:16, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done -- Ies (talk) 02:10, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lower_Saxony_by_genre_of_photography[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:Lower_Saxony_by_genre_of_photography has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 09:46, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ciell (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ciell (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ciell (talk) 19:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kannst du mir erklären, was das Problem ist?[edit]

wunderschön, die Kategorie churches in Holzbronn ist jetzt leer, umfasste Bilder von zwei Kirchen. z. B. File:Holzbronn Bernhardskirche 01.jpg Was ist jetzt der Vorteil, wenn man es bei Calw einsortiert? Keiner, aber der Bezug zu Holzbronn ist damit verloren. In der Kategorie Holzbronn findest du diese Bilder nicht wieder. Und eigene Kategorien für die beiden Kirchen gibts auch nicht, alles durcheinander.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 11:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo User:Giftzwerg 88, warum bist Du so unfreundlich? Mir scheint, dass Du das Kategorisierungssystem von Commons noch nicht so richtig verstanden hast. Denn das Problem war, dass die beiden betroffenen Kirchen nicht wie alle anderen Kirchen in Calw als Kirchen in Calw kategorisiert waren. Sie waren nicht einmal irgendwie als Bauwerke in Calw kategorisiert. Dass es für diese beiden Kirchen keine eigenen Kategorien gibt, solltest Du mir nicht zum Vorwurf machen, denn das hättest Du doch schon so kategorisieren können. Ich kann doch nicht dafür, wenn Du das nicht so kategorisiert hast! Schaue Dir doch einmal die recht saubere Kategorisierung der anderen Calwer Kirchen an. Die sind, falls mehrere Bilder vorhanden, zu Kategorien zusammengefasst, in denen, direkt oder indirekt, u.a. auch die zugehörigen Straßen kategorisiert sind, an denen die Kirchen stehen. Diesen Straße wiederum könnten sich in einem Ortsteil wie etwa Holzbronn befinden und entsprechend kategorisiert werden. Diese ganzen Möglichkeiten hast Du nicht genutzt, machst mir aber Vorwürfe, wenn ich Deine schlechte Kategorisierung etwas korrigiere. Wenn Dir noch etwas der Überblick fehlt und Du noch Kategorisierungsprobleme hast, helfe ich Dir gerne. Dafür wäre es aber sinnvoll, wenn Du freundlich fragst und Dich nicht unfreundlich beschwerst. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 12:32, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In so einem Fall kann man die Kategorie Churches of Holzbronn mit der Kategorie Churches of Calw versehen und alles ist gut und am richtigen Platz. Anderswo habe ich das so gemacht und hier hab ich das wohl versäumt. Jetzt ist alles zu weit oben in der Hierarchie. Im vergangenen Jahr habe ich mehrere tausend Bilder geschossen, allein hunderte von Bildern in und um Kirchen, und hochgeladen. Das war insgesamt eine Heidenarbeit und sehr zeitintensiv und ich habe auch jede Menge Kategorien neu geschaffen. Bei den beiden Kirchen bin ich jedoch nicht dazu gekommen, dafür noch eigene Kategorien zu schaffen, obwohl ich das eigentlich hätte machen sollen. Und wenn du dir schon die Arbeit machst, dann hättest du ja auch die beiden Kategorien selbst machen können. Die neuapostolischen Kirchen haben eine sehr lückenhafte Systematik und diese Kirche in Holzbronn, so wurde mir gesagt ist bald Geschichte und wird zu einem normalen Wohnhaus profaniert. Es gibt also demnächst noch was in der Beschreibung nachzutragen. Solange ich das nicht komplett recherchiert habe, wollte ich mir das erst mal für langweilige Winterabende aufsparen. Wenn du meinst, dass man alles noch mit Straßen versehen sollte, so tu dir keinen Zwang an. Alles hat GPS und du kannst für 4000 Bilder die Straßen raussuchen und neu anlegen, wenn es dir Spaß macht.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 17:15, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Übrigens habe ich von einer Reihe von Käffern rings um Calw Aufnahmen gemacht, wenn du also willst so kannst du auch die Kirchenkategorie für Calw-Stammheim machen und meine Kirchenbilder von Altburg noch kategorisieren. Ich müsste noch Tage zubringen bis ich bei jeder Kirche die richtige Konfession den richtigen Kirchenbezirk und die richtige Namenskategorie zugeordnet habe.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 17:34, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File[edit]

If so, please delete it now. Ezagren (talk) 09:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

??? -- Ies (talk) 10:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Merry Christmas 🎅🏻 and thank you for all the photographs you've donated to Wikimedia Commons this year and before, and for all your hard work in categorising images. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Donald Trung. I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas as well! -- Ies (talk) 11:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You thank you for all of your contributions, I forgot to mention your hard work in categorisation. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ies/Archive_2018-2&oldid=334001019"