User talk:Hubertl/QI-Archiv 1-2016

Quality Image Promotion 1.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7 Collection Eybl Great Britain - E. Kealey - Women of Britain say – GO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, see note --Jacek Halicki 10:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4685.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9867.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. How come the exhibitionist on the roof? --Rolf H. 09:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC) *  Comment he is a god. --Hubertl 10:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Klein (1854-1926), Nr. 68, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Büsten im Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-1253.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Probably I had cropped the leftmost scupture, but obviously it is an acceptable and intended play with DoF. --Cccefalon 13:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Classical, but still... thank you for your work on Commons! Yann (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, Yann, I´m sure we will have a very good time together this year. And as I hope, without any conflicts within the project! --Hubertl 13:59, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion 1.1.2016

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:AT-13763 Kuppelfigur Athene am Kunsthistorischen Museum 8970.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AT-13763 Kuppelfigur Athene am Kunsthistorischen Museum 8970.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

The traditional greeting

	Dear friend
	Happy New Year and best wishes!! Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:08, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, Christian, Pudeleks picture is a good choice for this moment. Even - or because -, that we don´t have any snow here! But I don´t miss it really. --Hubertl 22:19, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 2.1.2016

File:33 Sammlung Eybl Russland. Kohout. С новым годом. (Ein gutes neues Jahr!). 1918 -1919. 85 x 65 cm. (Slg.Nr. 1818).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 33 Sammlung Eybl Russland. Kohout. С новым годом. (Ein gutes neues Jahr!). 1918 -1919. 85 x 65 cm. (Slg.Nr. 1818).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 71448 Hofkapelle Kompatsch, Nauders-420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 3.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans Horst Meyer (1853-1939), Nr. 78, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality... Happy new year 2016. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:55, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julius von Wiesner (1838-1916), Nr. 71 basrelief (bronce) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-1201-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 22 Sammlung Eybl USA. H. R. Hopps (1869–1937). Destroy this mad brute (Vernichte dieses verrückte Vieh). 1917. 82 x 59 cm. (Slg.Nr. 3262).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Athene, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Wien-9884.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Aha, the women are dressed in your roofs..., good quality --Rolf H. 05:16, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:36, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 4.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 28-1 Sammlung Eybl Russland. Alexander Apsit (1880-1943) Европейская кухня (Europäische Küche). 1914. 36 x 51 cm. (Slg.Nr. 272).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Stunning rarity and excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 28-2 Sammlung Eybl Европейская кухня (Europäische Küche). 1914. 36 x 51 cm. (Slg.Nr.273).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Simply WOW! Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 25 Sammlung Eybl Österreich-Ungarn. Kurt Libesny (1892-1933). Zeichnet oesterr. 8. Kriegsanleihe. 1918. 95 x 64 cm.(Slg.Nr. 25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Precious collection of exquisit quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12 Sammlung Eybl (Slg.Nr. 1284) I vy občané - 1917, A. Erhardt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Phenomenal. The first time in my life I see these rarities. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 27 Sammlung Eybl Russland. Anonym. Европейская Война. Осада Перемышля. (Der europäische Krieg. Die Belagerung von Przemyśl). 1915. 57 x 80 cm. (Slg.Nr. 803).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thank you for these exceptional nominations. All are of excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion 4.1.2016

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:7 Collection Eybl Great Britain - E. Kealey - Women of Britain say – GO.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:7 Collection Eybl Great Britain - E. Kealey - Women of Britain say – GO.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

My apologies if that vote of mine caused offense. I certainly appreciate your work. I guess I'm just a bit burnt out on war, we have so much of it in the world. I should have just passed by that nomination without voting. Again, my apologies. INeverCry 09:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

No problem, I appreciate your active participation in the improvement of our quality standards, INeverCry! --Hubertl 10:22, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Good evening Heinz,

Thank you for your explanation.

Sincerely,

Dominicus

FP Promotion 5.1.2016

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9213.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9213.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

WP-15

Ich erwäge, Hotel Hubertl für 2 Tage zu buchen, da ich zum Intelligenztest aufs Amt möchte. Mal wieder schwatzen? --Ralf Roleček 22:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Wann?--Hubertl 11:23, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Der 14. ist Donnerstag, Zeit fürs Amt. Freitag Stammtisch und Sa. zurück? --Ralf Roleček 12:30, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Gut. Den Weg kennst ja und meine Telefonnummer hast ja auch.--Hubertl 12:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Vielleicht auch Di.-Do., hängt von verfügbaren Flugzeugen ab. Ich kann ja mal Futter mitbringen? --Ralf Roleček 13:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Danke!

Hallo Hubertl, ich möchte Dir ein ganz dickes Dankeschön aussprechen. Sowohl die Bereitstellung von Exponaten des Plakatmuseums Wien als auch die Wikiversity-Kurse sind eine ganz großartige Sache! Chapeau! Gruß, Hasenläufer (talk) 01:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Das freut mich aber ganz besonders jetzt, lb Hasenläufer, denn es kommt wirklich sehr selten vor, dass von sich aus jemand meine Uni-Seminare für Wikipedia anspricht. Viel Arbeit, viel Verantwortung aber auch ganz tolle Ergebnisse. Aber nicht nur die Uni, sondern auch Schulen und andere Bildungseinrichtungen habe ich in den letzten 2,5 Jahren betreut, um die 800 Personen. Und diese Plakate sind sozusagen ein Nebenprodukt. Könnte ich mich teilen, ich würde nicht nur zwei Lehrgänge, sondern gleich 20 machen, könnte ich die Sache so forcieren wie ich es wollte. Aber es fehlt an Leuten, die es sich zutrauen, selbst Lehrgänge zu leiten. Leider gibt es diese Grenzen. Lieben Gruß aus Wien, --Hubertl 02:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Ich muss gestehen, dass mir „Wikiversity“ bislang gar nicht bekannt war, obwohl ich seit nahezu 10 Jahren in Wikipedia aktiv bin und Wikiversity anscheinend genauso alt ist. Erst beim Stöbern über Deine Plakate bin auf Wikiversity und dortige Kurse gestoßen. Mich überrascht etwas, dass es dort mehr deutschsprachige Seiten gibt, als in der englischsprachigen Variante. Wie auch immer: ein respektables und wertvolles Projekt! Dass in jedem Kurs viel Arbeit steckt, kann ich mir in etwa vorstellen. Aber ich denke, es lohnt sich. Denn ich denke, es werden dort (wie auch bei allen anderen Wikipedia-Projekten) Werte „für die Ewigkeit“ geschaffen. Gibt es denn für derartige Projekte irgendwelche Arten von Förderung? Z. B. von der Wikimedia Foundation oder aus öffentlichen Mitteln? Ich wünsche nicht nur Dir, sondern allen weiteren Aktivisten weiterhin viel Erfolg und Spaß an der Arbeit! Herzlichen Gruß aus dem Rheinland, Hasenläufer (talk) 03:15, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Hasenläufer Wenn mich jemand in Wikipedia bittet, sein Mentor zu sein, dann mache ich es - wie hunderte andere auch. Ohne Förderung. Für mich ist Wikipedia schon längst an einem Punkt angelangt, wo es noch viel tiefer in die Gesellschaft eindringen wird als es ja eh schon tut. Nur muss man sich halt fragen, wer das bei sinkenden Autorenzahlen machen wird. Für mich bleiben die übrig, die vor wenigen Jahren noch die Nase gerümpft haben, nämlich die Lehrenden. Heute fordere ich bei Vorträgen genau diese Leute auf, nicht zu motzen, sondern selbst Verantwortung zu übernehmen. Und wo sollte Wissen herkommen, wenn nicht aus den Universitäten. Speziell dann, wenn die Themen immer komplexer werden, die "Allgemeinbildung" mehr als komplett abgebildet ist, man aber gleichzeitig erkennt, dass trotz 1,8 Mio. Artikeln nur ein Teilbereich abgebildet ist. Will man was tun, dann muss man dort anfangen, mit den Streithanseln aus der Wikipedia samt ihren unfähigen Administratoren wird man nicht weit kommen. Wie will man 1,8 Mio Artikel erweitern mit weniger Leuten wie noch vor 7 Jahren - bei einem gleichzeitig gestiegenen Wartungsaufwand - der schon fast unermesslich ist. Wir brauchen eine gesellschaftliche Breite. Im Grunde kann ich deinen Beitrag nur mit offenen Fragen begegnen - trotzdem es scheint, dass so ein Projekt die Lösung wäre. Schaue ich mir aber heute die Wikipedia an, dann sehe ich ,dass sich 80 Leute wochenlang um die Frage herumstreiten, ob Administratoren, die zurücktreten, von Stewards oder von Bürokraten aus der Liste ausgetragen werden sollen. Ein Vorgang, der gerade mal drei Mal im Jahr stattfindet. Fragt man aber um konkrete Teilhabe an Projekten, dann ist die Diskussion sofort beendet. In Österreich ist es gottseidank etwas besser, da wird schneller was gemacht, eher weniger diskutiert. Auch wenn wir ein kleines Häufchen sind. Aber in allem was in Zahlen abgebildet werden kann, stehen wir deutlich vorne. Relativ, nicht absolut, logischerweise. Scheint an einer geringeren Streitlust und Rechthabereiattitüde zu liegen. --Hubertl 03:45, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Deine Einschätzung teile ich uneingeschränkt. Mich erinnert das Thema an einen kürzlich in der „Süddeutschen“ erschienen Artikel. Noch gibt es Leute, die sich von den Streitereien fernhalten und „einfach machen“ (vorbildhaft ist in meinem regionalen Umfeld z. B. der Einsatz von Benutzer:Leit, siehe Benutzer:Leit/Verantwortlichkeitsliste) – es wäre mehr als schade, wenn auch solche Aktivisten irgendwann die Flinte ins Korn werfen. Auch Deine Wahrnehmung der Unterschiede zwischen deutscher und österreichischer Mentalität kann ich bestätigen, aus meiner Erfahrung in einem großen internationalen Konzern, bei dem ich oft mit österreichischen Kollegen zusammengearbeitet habe. Ich habe die österreichischen Kollegen stets um ihren Pragmatismus beneidet, während in der deutschen Konzernzentrale überwiegend „Politik“ betrieben wurde. Gruß, Hasenläufer (talk) 04:25, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 6.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andreas Josef von Stifft (Nr. 2) - Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-1327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:21, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adolf Mussafia (Nr. 44) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-1411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:21, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwig Barth von Barthenau (Nr. 47) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-1365.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:21, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carl von Rokitansky (Nr. 54) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna--4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:21, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz von Miklosich (Nr. 55) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9384.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:21, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4670.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Do you checked the image for dust spots? I think it's a good time to do this. ;-) --XRay 06:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC) *  Comment thanks and sorry, XRay. Not a good reputation for me ;-)  Comment Sorry. Again. Please check the two notes at your picture. (Two dust spots forgotten.) Passiert halt mal. Ich versuche ja auch immer, keine Fehler in den Bildern zu haben. Aber hin und wieder rutscht dann doch eines durch ... --XRay 09:12, 3 January 2016 (UTC) Jetzt aber, XRay! Sorry. Aber der eine Schatten war richtig pestig...--Hubertl 09:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)  Support Thanks. Great! --XRay 09:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 7797 Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Feldherrenhalle - Statuen-0301 2 3 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support All hail! God of the Sun. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:48, 3 January 2016 (UTC)  Comment Black dots near the head (birds?}: it would be better to remove them, it is easy to fix. Dmitry Ivanov 09:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Radovljica Linhartov trg drei Blechblasinstrumente 19032015 0925.jpg Darf ich Dich um Deinen Rat ersuchen

File:Radovljica Linhartov trg drei Blechblasinstrumente 19032015 0925.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC) Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:00, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Hmm. Schwierige Sache, Hans!. Dieser Aktionismus dieses Eleassar, der offenbar schon seit Jahren mit seinem Studium hängt, der ist wirklich ärgerlich. Manchmal kommt es vor, dass er sich nicht um freies Wissen bemüht sondern im Gegenteil dagegen arbeitet. Eine autistische Verhaltensweise, wie mir scheint, wie man das von einigen anderen Kategorienschubser auch kennt. Diese Leute arbeiten nur nach Regeln, persönliche Kontakte sind ihnen zuwider. Fakt ist aber, dass es ein Kunstwerk mit Copyrightschutz ist - und das in Slowenien. Ungeklärt ist es, wer der Maler ist und ob er ev. 70 Jahre tot ist, Signatur gibts ja keine. Dass es älter als 100 Jahre ist, das möchte ich anhand des Zustandes, aber auch vom Stil her mal bezweifeln. Es ist kein dauerhaftes Kunstwerk im öffentlichen Raum (was aber für Slowenien eh wurscht wäre). Der Zustand des Bildes weißt auf ein jüngeres Datum hin, etwas, was hunderfach gemacht wird und wurde (hing in jedem Herrgottswinkel oder als Fruchtbarkeitsfetisch über den Ehebetten), nichtsdestoweniger aber trotzdem einem schützenswerten Kunstbegriff zuzuordnen ist. Öl auf Leinen, und nicht einmal so schlecht gemacht, wenn auch ordentlich kitschig. Da hilfts nicht einmal, wenn du das Einverständnis des Eigentümer hättest. Du hättest es kaufen müssen sammt den Blechblasdingern und dasselbe Motiv in Kärnten nachstellen müssen. Das sind die Argumente die ich anführen kann, die aber Eleassar recht geben. Jedesmal wenn mir sowas von dem Kerl unterkommt, möchte ich ihn für eine Woche in die Adelsberger Grotte stecken und das Licht ausmachen. Mir tut´s im Herzen weh, gerade weil die Bildkomposition derartig gut ist. Und man genau weiß dass sich absolut niemand je darum scheren würde. Eine rein akademische Rechthaberei.--Hubertl 12:18, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Eine Lösung wäre es, wenn man ein ähnliches Bild aus Österreich nimmt und das dann fein säuberlich mit Photoshop austauscht. Einfach um die Komposition zu retten. Oder demonstrativ ausgraut und gegen einen Brandtext gegen NON-FOP in Slowenien austauscht, zumindest im letzteren Fall würde aber der Featured-Status verloren gehen. --Hubertl 12:23, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Das Bild ist vermutlich eine Madonna von en:Roberto Ferruzzi. Habe in dem LA kommentiert. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Im besten Fall eine Kopie, Steinsplitter. Wie ich meine, eine gemalte, keine Druckkopie. Somit wäre es wieder ein Original und auch geschützt. Aber ich bin ebenfalls der Meinung, dass Ferruzi die Vorlage lieferte. --Hubertl 13:44, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Es ist fraglich ob bei einer Händischen Reproduktion (sollte es eine sein) tatsächlich die Schöpfungshöhe erreicht ist. Ist immer eine case by case Sache. Mal schauen was der LA bring... lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:52, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Ich glaub nicht an Wunder (45€ für einen Ferruzzi). Trotzdem meine ich, dass es eine hervorragende Kopie ist. --Hubertl 13:55, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Ich auch nicht :P. Ich meinte vielleicht ist es nur ein Druck auf Leinwand oder so. Aber eher nicht. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:58, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Es muss so sein, stell dir vor, es wäre das Original! Und stell dir Hans vor, der zuhause sitzt und sich mit der Mistgabel stundenlang den Kopf malträtiert, weil er es nicht gekauft hat. --Hubertl 14:02, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Im Artikel de:Roberto Ferruzzi steht, das es vielfach reproduziert wurde, das Original ist verschollen. --Atamari (talk) 16:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Pestmarterl

Danke für die sehr nette Rückmeldung zum Bild. Ich wünsche Dir ein gutes und erfolgreiches neues Jahr!
--Dietrich Krieger (talk) 13:41, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Auch dir alles Gute und noch viele schöne Bilder heuer! (Heuer -> österreichisch -> dieses Jahr) --Hubertl 13:44, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 7.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0698.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 71448 Hofkapelle Kompatsch, Nauders-445.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 18:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 30a Sammlung Eybl Großbritannien. Alfred Leete (1882–1933) Britons (Kitchener) wants you (Briten Kitchener braucht Euch). 1914 (Nachdruck), 74 x 50 cm. (Slg.Nr. 552).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans Horst Meyer (1853-1939), Nr. 78, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Guten Rutsch mit Bakhlava!

Hallo Hubert! Ich bins, Nada, die palästinensische Studentin - wir haben zuletzt auf der Wikisource Conference geplaudert. Hier mal meine E-Mail Adresse: nada.el-azar@hotmail.com. Ich hoffe du hattest schöne Feiertage und dass wir uns eventuell beim nächsten Stammtisch in Wien am 15. Jänner sehen. Hab auch zum Einsatz von Wikipedia in universitären Bildungseinrichtungen recherchiert und bin dabei auf die Wikipedia Education Extension der Wiki Edu Foundation (https://wikiedu.org/) und das Ambassador Program (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Training/For_Ambassadors) gestoßen. Ich würde mich freuen mit dir in Hinblick auf das nächste Semester an der Uni Wien zu sprechen. Ma3 Salama, Nada A3AREL (talk) 21:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Nada, ich könnte mir gut vorstellen, dass wir etwas gemeinsam machen können! Reden wir d´rüber! --Hubertl 21:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Diascanner

• 
• 
• 

Ich hab mir einen Scanner zugelegt und einige Bilder geladen. Bin mir aber nicht sicher, ob ich die richtig eingelegt habe. Sond die Bilder seitenrichtig oder seitenverkehrt? Da diese ersten Testfotos aus Wien sind, frage ich dich ;) Es ist einfach zu lange her, ich weiß nicht mehr, wo das war bzw. wie herum... --Ralf Roleček 23:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Die ersten beiden sind richtig, beim Dritten bin ich mir nicht sicher, könnte von jeder Seite aus gesehen werden. --Hubertl 23:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Danke dir. Jetzt habe ich wahrscheinlich einige Jahre lang zu tun... --Ralf Roleček 23:35, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 8.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 6 Sammlung Eybl Frankreich. B. Chavannaz (gest. 1930). Emprunt National 1918 (Nationalanleihe 1918). 1918. 80 x 120 cm. (Slg.Nr. 2274).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality. Kruusamägi 00:44, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 9 Sammlung Eybl Borilli Parlano di pace e nascondono il pugnale! (Sie reden über Frieden und verheimlichen den Dolch!). 1918. 100 x 70 cm. (Slg.Nr. 2437).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hasenläufer 01:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 21 Sammlung Eybl Italien. Giovanni Capranesi (1852-1921). Sottoscrivete al presto (Unterzeichnet schnell). 1917. 135 x 100 cm. (Slg.Nr. 755) Kopie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hasenläufer 01:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 23 Russland. Alexander Apsit (1880-1943) Обманутым Братьям (Die entschlossenen Brüder). 1918. 103 x 68 cm. (Slg.Nr. 475).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hasenläufer 01:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:13, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-8911.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Athene (Benk), Kunsthistorisches Museum Wien-8973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Büsten im Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-1251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:27, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 9.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 8 Sammlung Eybl Österreich. Anonym. Zeichnet die 7. oesterreich. Kriegsanleihe. 1917. 74 x 95 cm. (Slg.Nr. 78).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality. Kruusamägi 00:44, 6 January 2016 (UTC)  Comment Wo hast Du bloß all die genialen Plakate aufgetrieben? Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:00, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 10.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but very similar to the other one --Uoaei1 19:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC) *  Comment, I changed it, Uoaei1, I hope this is QI for you too!

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-67-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-68-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:06, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Picture of the Day

Thanks, my first one! Charles (talk) 22:36, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion I 11.1.2016

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:30a Sammlung Eybl Großbritannien. Alfred Leete (1882–1933) Britons (Kitchener) wants you (Briten Kitchener braucht Euch). 1914 (Nachdruck), 74 x 50 cm. (Slg.Nr. 552).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:30a Sammlung Eybl Großbritannien. Alfred Leete (1882–1933) Britons (Kitchener) wants you (Briten Kitchener braucht Euch). 1914 (Nachdruck), 74 x 50 cm. (Slg.Nr. 552).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion II 11.1.2016

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9958.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9958.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 11.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vikoula5 09:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josef Seegen (1822-1904), Nr. 72 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:55, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinrich von Bamberger (1822-1888), Nr. 70 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vikoula5 09:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans Horst Meyer (1853-1939), Nr. 78, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vikoula5 09:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 12.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5 Sammlung Eybl Frankreich. Lucian Jonas (1880-1947). Grand Matineé de Bienfaisance (Große Wohltätigkeitsmatinée zugunsten der Witwen und Waisen). 1917. 120 x 80 cm. (Slg.Nr. 590).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:59, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15 Sammlung Eybl Italien. Anonym. Pro orfani di guerra (Für die Kriegswaisen!). Um 1919. 100 x 70 cm. (Slg.Nr. 466).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20 Sammlung Eybl Deutsches Reich. Gerd Paul. Es gilt die letzten Schläge den Sieg zu vollenden! Ohne Jahr, 86 x 59 cm. (Slg.Nr. 197).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:31, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 18 Sammlung Eybl Österreich-Ungarn. Herbert Rendl. Zeichnet 5. Kriegsanleihe! 1916. 95 x 63 cm. (Slg.Nr. 592).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:31, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rimberg-Panorama 2014.jpg

Meine Nominierung habe ich wohl leider verschlafen und deine Frage erst heute beantwortet. Danke fürs scharfe Nachsehen. Kannst bei Interesse ja nochmal vorbeischauen. --Milseburg (talk) 21:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 13.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-41-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4664.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think this is a good photo because the shadows under the sunscreen are not so very strong; it gives the image a natural contrast, so Q1 --Michielverbeek 14:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 7797 Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Feldherrenhalle - Statuen-0246 7 8 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:43, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-8964.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality welcome in the club "love butt". --Livioandronico2013 16:07, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3-2 Sammlung Eybl (Slg.Nr. 2268) Plakat 4. Kriegsanleihe 1916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I'm not sure, but please check for CAs. --XRay 07:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC) *  Comment I cannot imagine, that there are CAs, XRay. Just technically. There are some overlapping, but those came from the lithography work itself. I repaired the distortions. --Hubertl 16:16, 9 January 2016 (UTC)  Support OK. Thank you for your information. --XRay 08:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

So leer hier

Was ist passiert? Heute morgen las ich hier noch was zu Bewertungskriterien und wollte gerade was dazu senfen, weil ich vorher keine Zeit dazu hatte... -- Smial (talk) 14:35, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Aufgeräumt, Smial, war wohl ein bisserl zuviel des Kärcherns... Siehe nachfolgender Abschnitt. --Hubertl 14:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Thx. -- Smial (talk) 16:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Danke ....

Guten Morgen! Zurück aus Taiwan habe ich jetzt begonnen, die mehr als 3000 Bilder zu sichten und zu bearbeiten. In diesem Zusammenhang "Danke" für Deine kritischen Anmerkungen zu der "kein Wow"-Mentalität in FPC. Ich sollte mich mehr auf Kätzchenbilder konzentrieren, da scheint die Schwelle für Schöpfungshöhe niedriger zu sein. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 04:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Meine ich auch, Uwe! Gaaadseeeeen!!1!elf!! - btw, die acht Brücken sind FP-würdig, mir fehlt nur der Third Rock! Ähnlich war es mit dem Profilfoto von dem Indianermädchen, es muss von vorne sein und idealerweise auch noch lächelnd. Als ob ein sich-Abwenden nicht eine Aussage für sich ist. --Hubertl 04:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Es sind alle drei Felsen drauf. Die sind nur nicht monolithisch. zwei sind quasi ineinander verwachsen. Was tut der Volksmund alles, um eine Legende in eine paar Steine reinzuinterpretieren. Achja, das die drei Unsterblichen tatsächlich auf der Insel waren kann mit keiner reputablen Referenz nachgewiesen werden, insofern sollte eigentlich gar nicht drauf verwiesen werden.

Vielleicht sollte man man eine Initiative starten, dieses WOW-Kriterium abzuschaffen. In meinen Augen ist das eine ganz billige Methode, gegen etwas zu votieren, für das man sonst eigentlich keine stichhaltigen Gründe hat. Es wäre so, als würden wir in QIC eine Gefällt-mir-nicht-Ablehnung möglich machen. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 05:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Alle diese Wettbewerbe haben ihre eigene Dynamik, sie entwickeln sich manchmal in unerwartete Richtungen. Mit FPC bin ich nie warm geworden, genau wegen dieses "WOW"-Gehabes, das es damals, als ich noch bei DE:KEB aktiv war, dort nicht gab. Auf KEB stand der enzyklopädische Nutzen eindeutig im Vordergrund, gipfelnd in der zwingenden Regel, daß ein Foto nur dann EB werden kann, wenn es auch in einem Artikel eingebunden ist. Was gelegentlich zu lustigen Disputen führte, weil sehr gute im Artikel vorhandene Bilder kurzerhand gegen einen hoffnungsvollen EB-Kandidaten ausgetauscht wurden incl. Edit-War. Oder nichtssagende Stubs verfaßt wurden, damit es einen Artikel zum Bild gab. QIC und KEB haben sich teilweise in dieselbe Richtung entwickelt: Es ging irgendwann immer weniger darum, nützliches für die Wikipedia bzw. commons zu produzieren, möglichst mit einer gewissen Breitenwirkung zur Verbesserung der Qualität, sondern es entwickelte sich ein Klima, bei dem es mehr um Rechthaberei, Lufthoheit, Besserwisserei ging. Kann man immer recht einfach daran erkennen, wenn es zunehmend Diskussionen um Regelauslegungen, wenn es Klagen über tatsächliche oder vermeintliche Rachebewertungen gibt, wenn abfällige, herabsetzende, ironische Kommentare zu den Beiträgen anderer auftauchen. Bei KEB scheint sich das inzwischen beruhigt zu haben, aber um den Preis, daß dort heute nur noch ein verschwindend kleines Grüppchen aktiver Teilnehmer übrig geblieben ist, die außerhalb ihrer Veranstaltung nahezu keinerlei Wirkung mehr haben. Bei QIC scheinen mir ebenfalls einige einstmals sehr aktive Mitarbeiter verschwunden zu sein. Auch ich mache da ja kaum noch was, alleine schon weil mir spätestens nach der dritten entstellenden "perspective correction" die Fußnägel hochklappen und ich diese hilflosen Entrauschungsbemühungen echt nicht mehr sehen kann, insbesondere, wenn da nach entsprechenden Einwänden auch noch nachgeschärft wird, bis der Arzt kommt. -- Smial (talk) 16:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC) Ps: http://digitaler-augenblick.de/mit-diesem-posting-verliere-ich-bestimmt-leser-klartext/ ;-) -- Smial (talk) 23:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Was mich aktuell am meisten stört, ist der Kamm, über den gerade alles gezogen wird. Ich selbst bin ja der perfekte Bildmacher für die aktuellen Anforderungen. Nix darf sich bewegen, am besten alles mit Stativ. Bloß keine Menschen. Damit fallen viele durch den Rost, welche wesentlich schwierigere Aufgaben mit ihren Motiven zu bewältigen haben. Stage-, Sport- und Eventfotografie. Die würden auch gerne mal zur Kenntnis genommen werden. Aber das funktioniert nur in Ausnahmefällen. Schade. Mein Ansatz wäre, hier einfach einen anderen Maßstab anzulegen. Aber leider haben halt die meisten hier keine Erfahrung mit sowas und steigen von dem nicht runter, was sie hier gelernt haben. Dass aber schwierige Situationen auch mit Abstrichen einhergehen, die man bei statischen Motiven nicht hat, das trauen sich viele nicht zu, dafür mal positiv einzustehen. Leider ist es aber so, dass mehrere betroffene Leute, die ich angesprochen habe, eine notwendige Regeländerung nicht aktiv betreiben wollen. --Hubertl 23:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Mein manueller focus stack

Ich hatte Dir ja geschrieben, dass ich mal versucht hatte, das stacking ganz ohne Steuerungsprogramm durch vorsichtiges Verstellen des Schärferings zu bewerkstelligen. Das ging erstaunlich gut, siehe File:Kaohsiung Taiwan Kaohsiung-Confucius-Temple-03.jpg Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 20:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Uwe: Hey, das ist ja wirklich echt geil. Obwohl gerade das Spiel mit DOF in solchen Situationen durchaus sehr reizvoll sein kann. Aber wirklich gut. Gut zu wissen, dass es geht. Single shots oder HDR? Auf jeden Fall FP für mich, mit dem leider etwas zu hellen Hntergrund kann man durchaus leben. --Hubertl 21:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Single shots. Stativ, Spiegelvorauslösung und manuelle Belichtung. Ich bin selber überrascht über das Ergebnis. Das "Licht am Ende des Tunnels" hab ich bewusst so gelassen. Das war vor Ort genauso; die Sonne stand im Zenit und auf der Strasse war es gleissend hell. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 05:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Uwe: Im Gegensatz zu HDR sind ja gestackte Bilder unterschiedlich groß (ziemlich heftig sogar!) und werden dann mit einem komplizierten Algorithmus zusammengerechnet und angepasst. Möglicherweise sind sie nicht so sensibel, was kleine Veränderungen/Abweichungen betrifft. Bei einem HDR darfst nix angreifen. Das merkt man sofort. Ist mir schon mehrfach passiert, wenn man viele HDRs hintereinander mit 7 Bildern macht, das dauert ziemlich lange und plötzlich greife ich zwischendurch unvermittelt an das Stativ. Aber das macht dann wenig, denn dann lässt man das halt aus, wenn man es bemerkt. Bei FP wird es bemerkt ;-) --Hubertl 09:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Ja, scheint so, dass Helicon da einen super Job macht. Ich musste ja jedesmal an die Camera ran und hatte grosse Sorge, dass sich da was verschieben könnte. Ende gut, alles gut :) --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 14.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-65-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Uncommon view, but good quality. --Uoaei1 06:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-69-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 15.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0669.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans Horst Meyer (1853-1939), Nr. 78, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:15, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-2 1200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Exterior of the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-9856.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 16.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-8992.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Exterior of the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-9901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9879.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:22, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 32 Sammlung Eybl Russland. Anonym. Мои русские друзья. (Meine russischen Freunde). 1919. 68 x 86 cm. (Slg.Nr. 1693).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:22, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 29 Sammlung Eybl Russland. Ivan A. Vladimirov (1869-1947). Военный заём (Kriegsanleihe). 1916. 66 x 50 cm. (Slg.Nr. 470).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hasenläufer 11:49, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hasenläufer 11:49, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 7797 Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Feldherrenhalle - Statuen-0266 7 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Thanks for the hint! --Hasenläufer 12:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9868.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. According crop: I meant the top and a bit the sides, not the bottom. --Hasenläufer 12:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion 16.1.2016

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9059.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9059.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 17.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Hubert

Hello Hubert, thanks for advice. Sorry, but at first I did not understand the word "calibration" (or the Dutch equivalent) in this context. However I realize that I have not installed my monitor correctly; a maximum brightness might have been the most important reason why I developed most photos too dark. I have changed this value and hope it will improve my photos.

I am developing photos mostly in the evening and I am having one small light. I have never realized that the light in the room would also influence the result. When I am busy I am drinking a bit alcohol (mostly Belgian beer) and I am listening to alternative music.

At this moment I am busy to select 2015 photos (and Dutch WLMphotos from 2014) for possible Q1promotion. Some of those photos I will make a bit brighter or redevelop.

This Sunday it was a perfect day to make beautiful photos ands I have been working in my living place Arnhem. I will soon upload some of those photos and please stay critical.

Greetings, --Michielverbeek (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

You are very welcome, Michiel, in general I do appreciate your pictures very much, especially your motif findings and decisions and the accuracy! --Hubertl 17:51, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Good evening Heinz,

Subject File photo: Deformed spray (Clitocybe nebularis) into disrepair. The location Famberhorst 04.JPG.
I have not nominated the conscious picture.
Sincerely,
Dominicus. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

 Comment Sorry, Dominicus, of course, Σπάρτακος was the nominator, not you! --Hubertl 17:48, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Oké just fine. Greetings from a wintery Friesland (province of the Netherlands)--Famberhorst (talk) 19:03, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 18.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 Sammlung Eybl USA. Anonym. Will you help The RED CROSS COUNTS on YOU 1917. 101 x 71 cm. (Slg.Nr. 356).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality. --Tsungam 08:34, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 26 Sammlung Eybl Russland. Anonym. Наука Немцу (Dem Deutschen eine Lehre). Ohne Jahr (wahrscheinlich 1914). 61 x 41 cm. (Slg.Nr. 41a).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4653.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-9033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Büsten im Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-1252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

File:14 Sammlung Eybl Österreich. Alfred Offner. Zeichnet 8. Kriegsanleihe. 1918, edit.jpg

Hi, I made a new version, lighter and with more contrast. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, Yann, I will show it the owner of the poster - it´s a color lithographiy -, he may have a look at both. Your version is very lively, actually, I like it! The owner, Eric Eybl knows the existing, of course also bleached original better than I do, he knows also the digitised version very well (grey card were used). It´s always a question of originality, even when a processed, refurbished version does maybe look a bit more dramatic and maybe closer to the origional print. The main point for me is, that this is in fact a work with a fantastic conservation, 98 years old. Every change we made, may cause a kind of forgery. I have the tendency to keep the actual conserved poster, without refurbishments. --Hubertl 19:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

The Four Evangelists FP-Promotion 20.1.2016 18.1.2016

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Portrait of Matthew in gold frame on purple background, with gold, green, and other colors (NYPL b12455533).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/The Four Evangelists has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your help! Yann (talk) 22:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Aren´t all four pictures dedicated being your personel FPs, Yann?? I´m confused... --Hubertl 22:12, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Well, you made at least half of the work. ;) Yann (talk) 22:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Yann, I´ll do a reposit when times will come. On the long run, everything will be even, this is my philosophy. Greetings from Vienna! Hubertl 22:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 19.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudolf Much (Nr. 63) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrich Jodl (1849-1914), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna (Nr. 66)-1249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 21:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otto Benndorf (1838-1907), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna (Nr. 67)-1265.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robert Ultzmann (1842-1889), Nr. 69, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 21:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinrich von Bamberger (1822-1888), Nr. 70 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 20.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-74-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:33, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Exterior of the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-9852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:33, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-64-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:33, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14 Sammlung Eybl Österreich. Alfred Offner (1879-1937). Zeichnet 8. Kriegsanleihe. 1918. 95 x 63 cm. (Slg.Nr. 325).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 30b Sammlung Eybl USA James Montgomery Flagg (1877-1960) I want you for U.S. Army (Ich brauche Dich für die US-Armee). 1917. 101 x 76 cm. (Slg.Nr. 3116).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 21.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1342.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julius von Wiesner (1838-1916), Nr. 71 basrelief (bronce) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 22.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9866.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-9045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Büsten im Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-1250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I like the focus. --Hasenläufer 02:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13766 Anaxagoras, roof figure by Friedrich Beer at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 8931-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13766 Detail of a lantern at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 9049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum, Wien, Otto Ferdinand Graf Traun-9037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figure, Isidor von Milet at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0654.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figure, Bernward von Hildesheim at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion 22.1.2016

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:14 Sammlung Eybl Österreich. Alfred Offner (1879-1937). Zeichnet 8. Kriegsanleihe. 1918. 95 x 63 cm. (Slg.Nr. 325).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:14 Sammlung Eybl Österreich. Alfred Offner (1879-1937). Zeichnet 8. Kriegsanleihe. 1918. 95 x 63 cm. (Slg.Nr. 325).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 23.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Exner (Nr. 57) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4652.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMHO, the white balance could be adjusted. Due to the daylight filtered by the umbrellas, it's too red (see white areas at lower right corner). --Hasenläufer 02:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC) * Fixed Thank you, Hasenläufer. Please have another look! --Hubertl 09:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)  Comment Better now. Thanks for your effort! --Hasenläufer 21:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna 8958-Bearbeitet-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion 25.1.2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13766 Strabon - Roof figure at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 8921-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:14, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13766 Theophrastus (Tyrtamos) Roof figure at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 8915-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Hu, da musstest Du aber schwere Geschütze aufffahren - 800 mm 1/2000s - um an die Dachfiguren ranzukommen.) Ich stand über einem U-Bahn-Bahnhof, good Vibrations. --Cccefalon 05:14, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-9012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13766 Herodotus - roof figure at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 8925-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 23:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion 26.1.2016

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:30b Sammlung Eybl USA James Montgomery Flagg (1877-1960) I want you for U.S. Army (Ich brauche Dich für die US-Armee). 1917. 101 x 76 cm. (Slg.Nr. 3116).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:30b Sammlung Eybl USA James Montgomery Flagg (1877-1960) I want you for U.S. Army (Ich brauche Dich für die US-Armee). 1917. 101 x 76 cm. (Slg.Nr. 3116).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Hubertl, I am currently submitting the "Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum East Court" in the Featured picture candidates. One of the criticisms that you and others have made is that my photograph needs perspective correction. I have now updated the photograph and done perspective correction.

QI - Diskussion

Danke für die Info. Ich wusse nicht, dass man eigene Bilder in die Diskussion schicken kann. Dass ginge dann ja immer, wenn man mit einem Decline nicht einverstanden ist. Kann man so auch eine Entscheidung erzwingen, wenn ein Bild partout blau umrandet bleibt, weil sich keiner festlegen mag? --Milseburg (talk) 10:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Ja, Milseburg, das Consensual Review ist praktisch die Erweiterung der Entscheidung auf einen mehrköpfigen Senat. Tatsache ist aber, der Nominator hat keine eigene Stimme, die einer ablehnenden Stimme gleichwertig gegenübergestellt werden kann. Das CR kann aber auch zu einer Nichtentscheidung mit dem Vorteil einer späteren Wiedernominierung führen, eine ehemals abgelehnte Nominierung muss deutlich begründet bzw. das Bild verbessert werden. --Hubertl 11:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Ich muss widersprechen: Es wurde in früheren Diskussionen allerdings deutlich gemacht, dass CR lediglich ein Instrument ist, eine Entscheidung anzufechten. Eine Verschiebung einer Nominierung ohne Review ins CR ist ein Missbrauch dieses Instruments. Es steht jedem frei, eine nicht bewertete Nominierung erneut mit dem Zusatzz "previously not assessed" erneut einzustellen. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Das habe ich aber damit auch ausgedrückt, Uwe. Der Nominierende, wie auch jeder andere, kann eine Einzelentscheidung anfechten. Der Unterschied liegt nur darin, dass der Nominierende damit die Entscheidung des Erstablehners nicht aufheben kann, das können nur andere mit ihrer Stimme. Auch, dass bei einer Nichtbeurteilung eine Verschiebung durch den Nominierenden in den CR sinnlos ist (aus Zeitgründen) habe ich angeführt. Aber es ist richtig, eine Nichtbewertung im regulären Prozess sollte nicht durch den Nominierenden angefasst und in den CR gestellt werden. Ich kann mich aber nicht erinnern, dass das im letzten Jahr irgendwann einmal stattgefunden hätte.--Hubertl 12:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Ich weiss, dass Du es richtig gemeint hast. Dein "Ja" auf die Frage von Milseburg liess halt den Schluss zu, dass man blau umrandete Bilder ins CR stellen kann. Das wollte ich damit klarstellen . --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4662.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13766 Theophrastus (Tyrtamos) Roof figure at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 8913.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13766 figure at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 9047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-9046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, sharp photo, good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 23:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13766 Theophrastus and Strabon - roof figures at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 8966-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-9043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen, Hofmann von Aspernburg, southwest side-5281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Büsten im Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-1257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans Horst Meyer (1853-1939), Nr. 78, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 11:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josef Seegen (1822-1904), Nr. 72 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 12:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 11:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-9019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but maybe the need to be indetified? --C messier 11:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinrich von Bamberger (1822-1888), Nr. 70 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:33, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13766 Roof figures at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 8928-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Johann Jaritz 04:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-8988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Exner (Nr. 57) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien - Blick von der Westseite des KHM-9853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13766 Herodotus - Rössner - figure at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 8936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leo Graf Thun und Hohenstein (Nr. 58) Statue in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eingangsbereich der Ruhmeshalle, HGM, Wien 0400 1 2 3 4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eingangsbereich der Ruhmeshalle, HGM, Wien 0400 1 2 3 4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien - Blick von der Westseite des KHM-9845-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Maybe you should correct exposure by +0.25 EV, to use the complete dynamic range available. --Rftblr 00:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Fixed, thanks, Rftblr --Hubertl 02:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Südosttabernakel Poseidon-9970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Athene, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Wien-9825.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Attikalbalustrade, Viktorien J.Benk-9976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Nordwesttabernakel-9793.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Nordwesttabernakel-9900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment You should crop the image to place the tabernacle in the center and remove the sensor dirt spot at the top edge. Also a exposure compensation of +0.5 would benefit the image without blowing anything out. --Rftblr 00:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Fixed, thanks, Rftblr --Hubertl 02:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Rftblr 07:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Roof figures at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna-71-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien - Blick von Museumsquartier-9892.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Kuppel - Blick von Südwesten 9849.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rftblr 19:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Südwesttabernakel-9862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but could stand +0.25 EV exposure compensation. --Rftblr 19:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien - Blick von der Westseite des KHM-0004-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rftblr 19:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julius von Wiesner (1838-1916), Nr. 71 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Calvary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Calvary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Calvary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1640.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Calvary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josef Seegen (1822-1904), Nr. 72 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1680.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1663.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1600-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Calvary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9185.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9185.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julius von Wiesner (1838-1916), Nr. 71 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinrich von Bamberger (1822-1888), Nr. 70 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otto Benndorf (1838-1907), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna (Nr. 67)-1266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1763.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien - Blick von Museumsquartier-9895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josef Seegen (1822-1904), Nr. 72 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0684.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Attikalbalustrade, Viktorien Carl Kundmann - links-9985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Attikalbalustrade, Viktorien Carl Kundmann - rechts-9986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Figurengruppe an der Facade-9979.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rftblr 19:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Figurengruppe an der Facade-9982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4648.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Südosttabernakel-9858.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 05:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1597.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Poseidon Tabernakel - Blick von Südwesten 9851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20136 Maria-Theresien-Denkmal Kaiserforum Wien-9041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13763 Figures at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna 8954-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail de la vie de Jesus Christ Feuille A - Chromo-lithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail de la vie de Jesus Christ Feuille B - Chromo-lithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail de la vie de Jesus Christ Feuille C - Chromo-lithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail de la vie de Jesus Christ Feuille D - Chromo-lithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 17:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail de la vie de Jesus Christ Feuille E - Chromo-lithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1765.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Klein (1854-1926), Nr. 68, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted ccw (see housewalls), elsewhere good --Cccefalon 05:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC) Fixed, thanks for review, Cccefalon, --Hubertl 09:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 23:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail de saint Eustache - Feuille A - Lithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail de saint Eustache - Feuille B - Lithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 10:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail de saint Eustache - Feuille C - Lithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 10:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail de sainte Anne portant la Sainte Vierge Feuille A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail de sainte Anne portant la Sainte Vierge Feuille B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 10:31, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Notre Dame de la Belle Verrière - Feuille A Lithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Notre Dame de la Belle Verrière - Feuille B Chromo-lithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail de la passion de Jesus Christ - Plan H - Feuille A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail de la passion de Jesus Christ - Plan H - Feuille B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail de la passion de Jesus Christ - Plan H - Feuille C.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Les quatre grands Prophétes portant les quatre Evangelistes - Feuile 2A - Chromelithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 22:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Les quatre grands Prophétes portant les quatre Evangelistes - Feuile 2B - Chromelithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 22:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Notre Dame de la Belle Verrière - Details - Chromo-lithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 22:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jan Ingen-Housz (1730-1799), Nr. 37 bust (bronze) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-2183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jan Ingen-Housz (1730-1799), Nr. 37 bust (Bronce) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-2172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudolf Wegscheider (1859-1935), Nr. 38 (Bronce) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-2156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudolf Wegscheider (1859-1935), Nr. 38 (bronze) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-2159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudolf Much (Nr. 63) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail del arbre de Jessé Feuille A Facade Occidentale - Lithographie deux teiintes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail del arbre de Jessé Feuille B - Lithographie deux teintes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Vitrail del arbre de Jesse Feuille C - Lithographie deux teiintes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien - Blick von Museumsquartier-9887.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

The globe QICs

Regarding my QI nominations for File:Decorative globe with prismatic burst at top.jpg and File:Decorative globe at gift shop near Teotihuacan, Mexico.jpg: Thanks for looking at them so critically, actually: they were both very spur-of-the-moment shots that actually looked better than I had expected, but still had some faults, and I wondered how everyone else would see them. I'm glad you were realistic about them. Daniel Case (talk) 19:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

In my opinion, Daniel, sometimes it is necessary, even important, to reflect, how someone manage a difficult situation. To tackle some standard situations is not really a challenge. Yet enough people fail just doing simple things. And compare those results then with complex situations. --Hubertl 22:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Les quatre grands Prophétes portant les quatre Evangelistes - Feuile 1a - Chromelithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monografie de la Cathedrale de Chartres - Atlas - Les quatre grands Prophétes portant les quatre Evangelistes - Feuile 1B - Chromelithographie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 70028 Cavary Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria 1713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien - Blick von der Westseite des KHM-9854.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrich von Wieser (Nr. 12) Busrelief in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-1331.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)