User talk:Howard61313/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Howard61313

Sorry! Recently, my workload has increased, and I have had to postpone my reply to your message.--Kai3952 (talk) 12:16, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Re: Please be careful of your indiscriminate and irrelevant edits

Look at [1] and [2]. In fact, I said it "twice" before changing your edits, but you never paid attention. I think, maybe you may choose to ignore it(or don't care). If you have opinions about my edits, well that is not my fault. Also, there are several issues with your edits:

  1. For example: look at [3] and [4], you are opposed to the word "的". In the Chinese grammar, "的" should be added because it is not a proper noun. A clearer explanation is: Typically we will omit "的", and the reason is because of the "colloquialism".
  2. You think, "vehicle" used translation in Chinese is "交通工具". The problem is: It has three titles in Chinese: "載具", "交通工具", and "運輸工具". At present, Chinese Wikipedia is not clearly introduced. I think the best way is: Temporarily treat them as different names. Unless or until this issue was resolved at Chinese Wikipedia.
  3. You think, "transport" used translation in Chinese is "交通". I think you have confused it with "traffic". I highly recommended you read these two articles: "en:Traffic" and "en:Transport".
  4. For example: Look at "Category:Views from automobiles in Taiwan", if the category contains only one kind(or a function), then we should not subdivide categories into small subcategories. Just like you create "Category:Views from automobiles in Taiwan by city" and "Category:Views from automobiles in Taiwan by county". I hope you stop your unreasonable edits.
  5. I know that Taiwan is not like countries such as the U.K. or the U.S., and therefore we shouldn't think of English "underground train station" as corresponding to Chinese "地鐵站". But I think we should add annotations for "Category:Underground train stations in Taiwan" to exclude all possible misunderstandings.
  6. You insist that "train station" should should not be translated to "火車站". As we discussed before, "火車站" and "鐵路車站" are the same meaning in Chinese. Although we speak in English, I still hope you trying to use your brain and to think what I said. To sum up, whichever you choose, makes no difference to our use of this category. Now the only problem is..."YOU". Because you chose "軌道運輸車站", why don't you to reference this article: "zh:鐵路車站"?
  7. You are telling me that "train station" category does not include the MRT station. I know, but it still is a type of train station. See: "en:Metro station". If you insist on opposing, you should move it to another page, rather than to remove my edits again. For example, moved page "Category:Train stations in Banqiao District, New Taipei" to "Category:Rapid transit stations in Banqiao District, New Taipei".
  8. Look at "Category:Emergency services in Taiwan". You think, "emergency service" used translation in Chinese is "應急機構". In my opinion, you seem to misunderstand the word "機構". Category:Emergency services" contains equipment‎, warning systems‎, food relief‎, mass-casualty incident, search and rescue, but these are not "Human", and I do not understand why do you think it is "機構" in Chinese.

As described above, your edits brought me many problems, but you insist that this is all caused by me. If you really care about Chinese translation of the categories, I suggest you go to "en.wikipedia" and "zh.wikipedia", and to contribute for the improvement and the adding of translations. Especially, their articles need your talent to improve all problem and issue. Here, we are dedicated to processing files and categories. For Chinese translation, it is provided to the users from Taiwan who are not familiar with English, but not the main work itself. If I did not correct the Chinese translation, then it will happen like the 7th example, there will be more problems at that time.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:59, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Reply:
  1. Please take a look at this discussion, it shows the problem exists with your Chinese, so I do not recommend that you remove my edits. If you oppose adding "的", I will try to discuss with them at "Wikipedia:互助客栈/条目探讨".
  2. I did not discuss MOTC or 交通部. What I said is that I suggest you discuss with them(zh.wikipedia), so that to determine which title we should use, to solve problems in Chinese translation.
  3. 既有慣例? No, you should not confuse Wikimedia.Commons with Chinese Wikipedia(zh.wikipedia). It is obvious as you look at two articles(zh:交通 and zh:运输) that they are different between "交通" and "運輸".
  4. Nobody says? You don't know who is against to subdivide category. You can see "this".
  5. Wikimedia.Commons is NOT Chinese Wikipedia(zh.wikipedia). If my edits need to be in accordance with "w:zh:Wikipedia:格式手册", I suggest you go to "zh.wikipedia" and correct their edits at any time.
  6. From what you say, it looks like your personal opinion and analysis, but at least I have provided you with ample proof. If you don't think so, then I suggest you discuss this issue with them(en.wikimedia and zh.wikimedia). Also, I did not say "colloquialism".
  7. Look at your edits, you actually really say that in the edit summary. If you don't mean this, then why do you remove my edits?
  8. No, you misunderstood. What I said is that this category includes not only "機構" but also other. For example‎, Category:Emergency services equipment is not an organization or department. So please do not confuse this with "機構".
I already explained to you that I said it "twice" before changing your edits, but you did not fix what they asked you to fix(see: "Commons:Help desk/Archive/2018/04#Do you think the bus is an automobile?"). If you have done it, then why your change does not show in the revision history? Whether you're receiving or giving advice, and only when my edits has to do with "Chinese language" or "Chinese writing", you make rules ask me to follow Chinese Wikipedia(zh.wikipedia). What you must know is: "Wikimedia.Commons is not Chinese Wikipedia(zh.wikipedia)." I will not blindly follow your unreasonable rules, and I hope you stop. Also, you told me twice that "your understanding of English may be insufficient to fully express". I think, this is not a discussion with good faith. I'm not sure what the intention is with your "twice". If you don't have a good reason, please do not say so!--Kai3952 (talk) 21:48, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
  1. That is your personal opinion, and I already said: "If you oppose adding 的, I will try to discuss with them at Wikipedia:互助客栈/条目探讨". What's your problem?
  2. OK.
  3. Do you mean to say that "交通" and "運輸" are different meanings, so I can't combine the two into one word: "交通運輸"?
  4. Well...Do you mean to say that's my problem?
  5. But that's not important to Wikimedia.Commons. If you care about this issue, you can discuss further at COM:VP.
  6. Sorry, I forgot to show you this article: "en:Metro station".
  7. I know.
  8. Please read this article: "en:Emergency service".
Indiscriminate reverting? Well...I suggest you report me to an administrator. Also, I'm not blind at all. The reason you are unreasonable is: "You are using the ways of Chinese Wikipedia(zh.wikipedia) to interfere with my edits". If you do not stop, then I have the right to ignore your personal opinion. I know, "Your understanding of English may be insufficient to fully express" is what I said before. So what? If you think it is a "criticism", I suggest you report me to an administrator. I don't think you understand English as much as they do. I am more confident in what Bjh21, Jmabel, Jeff G., Nilfanion, Odysseus1479, and Yann etc. say. because their mother tongue is English. Do you understand it now?--Kai3952 (talk) 21:09, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I do. I've understand that some of them are your own funny fallacies. I'll reply them at your talk page.--Howard61313 (talk) 31 May 2018 (Thu) 03:06 (UTC)
So what?--Kai3952 (talk) 03:11, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
So "I'll reply them at your talk page", "later".--Howard61313 (talk) 31 May 2018 (Thu) 03:15 (UTC)

I think I finally understand your point. Those problems can be solved with "annotations", but you seem to be against this way. What better way do you suggest then? If I have distorted what you said, then I'm sorry for that. You're right. I admit that I have "this defect". Not only happens in English, but also in Chinese. As you said, I messed-up. But I can ask them.--Kai3952 (talk) 05:12, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

I will try to solve the issue in the next days. If I have further questions I'll ask there in future. What else do you want to discuss?!--Kai3952 (talk) 02:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

==

Copyright status: File:William Brent Christensen 酈英傑 (Flickr id 30342565078).jpg

Copyright status: File:William Brent Christensen 酈英傑 (Flickr id 30342565078).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:William Brent Christensen 酈英傑 (Flickr id 30342565078).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:58, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Female_diplomats_of_the_United_States

Category discussion warning

Female diplomats of the United States has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

–MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:23, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Douglas G. Spelman 史伯明 (Voice of America 美国之音 VOA Video 尼克松访华40周年-美中关系展望(1) 00：00：34).png

File:Douglas G. Spelman 史伯明 (Voice of America 美国之音 VOA Video 尼克松访华40周年-美中关系展望(1) 00：00：34).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:35, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Template:People shown in this photograph/doc

Template:People shown in this photograph/doc is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

Unnecessary: "depicts" automatically appear in "Structured data"

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Spring onion pancake 2013.JPG: Question regarding location

I know it's been six years, but do you know where you took this photo? It doesn't need to be too specific, just what country you were in, what style the pancakes were, and whether these were homemade, from a restaurant, or from a street vendor. If you remember, adding this information to the information page will be very useful. Thanks! Lockesdonkey (talk) 20:59, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 12:27, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 12:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Howard61313/Archive_3&oldid=658961029"