User talk:Harp

Welcome to the Commons, Harp!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Rama 13:16, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

CMS

Hey, you said that ATLAS wsa the greatest experiment of the LHC, and CMS too ! ;)

I will be uploading more photos of ATLAS and the surrounding, if you want to make comments, your knowledge is undoubtly more accurate and fresh than mine. Cheers ! Rama 18:30, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

006:12:06: Please excuse me, but I'm trying to find out why you show the electric and magnetic fields in phase, instead of one half out of phase, on your sketch of the transverse, spherical electro-magnetic wave. Thank you.

Harp

You left a message on my discussion page (Jz_007) Such are the vagaries of Wikipedia authoring that I've no idea how I should respond and the help section wasn't much help! See more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jz_007

JZ Update: I've now updated the CMS page...

SVG

The font I used for the Gamma and mu symbols is Times New Roman. Is there a better font to use that would give better cross platform results? -- Borb 17:29, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Fehérvár

Szívesen :) Szólj még nyugodtan, ha kell valami ilyesmit. Alensha 12:11, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

tényleg szebb így az a kép, köszi! Alensha 12:31, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

SVG or without text (for Arpad)

Hi, if you write me your e-mail, I can send you original pictures in .cdr format for Corel Draw. You can then modify it for your need and for import to commons. I answerd for question on my discussion (http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedista:Vitecek) --Vitecek

Orbital Elements cleanup requested

Hello Arpad. Your structured vector graphics representation of the orbital elements, Orbit.svg is certainly much, much cleaner than the bitmap it replaced. Sadly there appears to be a technical error that was extant even in the original bitmap drawing you worked with. What the original author labeled as mean anomaly corresponds to true anomaly See Orbit.svg Wikipedia talk page. Perhaps you may have time to repair this? Thank you! -- Garry R. Osgood 21:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Update: I patched Orbit.svg; labeling the angle correctly. I have done nothing with Orbit_hu.svg, however: I do not know Hungarian. :(. Perhaps you could synchronize the two? Thank you! Garry R. Osgood 13:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Pi-unrolled_slow.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pi-unrolled_slow.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 20:07, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition

Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006 Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February. Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | +/−

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 22:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Notice for me:

• 
  17
• 
  33
• 
  44
• 
  55
• 
  57
• 
  67
• 
  108 Hangya a növényevő virágon
• 
  109
• 
  112
• 
  117
• 
  121
• 
  137
• 
  152
• 
  153
• 
  164
• 
  208
• 
  222
• 
  226
• 
  281
• 
  287
• 
  291

Commons:Picture of the Year/2006/Voting phase 1

Van de Graaff

Hello! I've added a English descripton. I've noticed that "8" is missing near black rectangle - target. Regarding arrows - You can add heads to it, or just delete them. I suggest to make one medium arrow in the middle of tube to mark the direction of flow of accelerated particles. It's just a simple picture, magnetes has been neglected, but of cource You can those part as well as other. Your translation of Polish text is correct. Greetings! NH2501 16:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Polo-khan.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Polo-khan.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. CO₂ 21:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:SPS.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:SPS.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao 03:03, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

COPYRIGHT

I have a question about GNU Free Documentation License. If I use an image in a film that is posted on Wikipedia Commons and licensed under GNU-FDL, do I have to include an Appendix with the author's name and the licensing information at the end of the film? Also, for a file like this one: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:CERN-aerial.jpg, where there are two "authors," or Wikipedia users, how do I site the author?

Thanks.

Dgosser (talk)

Image:Quark structure neutron.svg

Could you clarify the license on this? - Anonymous Dissident^Talk 15:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Harp!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

• Image:AFelho.svg is uncategorized since 27 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

CERN CMS licensing

I see that you're the original creator of Template:PD-CERN-CMS. Could you please comment on this discussion? Thanks. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 14:32, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Left him a note at hu.wiki; he seems to be more active there--DieBuche (talk) 11:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Kepler's laws of planetary motion

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kepler%27s_laws_of_planetary_motion#The_pictures_don.27t_match_the_text. Thank you. Bo Jacoby (talk) 03:40, 14 December 2013 (UTC).

File:CERN CMS Solenoid schematic.jpg

File:CERN CMS Solenoid schematic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

File:CMScollaborationPoster.png

File:CMScollaborationPoster.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Insertion of vac-tank 2.jpg

File:Insertion of vac-tank 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:20, 4 June 2015 (UTC)