User talk:Gouwenaar/Archive 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Zelfportret 23februari1942 van Cor van Teeseling (1915-1942).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

47.150.89.223 02:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pylon van Rommen[edit]

Dag Gouwenaar, File:Pylon van Rommen.jpg De foto heeft denk ik niet de juiste naam van de kunstenaar. Ik heb zelf ook foto's van de kolommen (pylonnen) gemaakt en op de kolommen staat de naam G. v. Remmen. Zie mijn upload File:Twee kolommen van Gerard van Remmen in Gouda (03) Signatuur.jpg Groet --Agaath (talk) 17:51, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dag Agaath, dank voor je bericht. Bij mijn vermelding ben ik uitgegaan van "Beelden in Gouda, kunst van de twintigste eeuw" door Oscar van Wijk. Hij heeft op pag. 105 enkele foto's van het kunstwerk opgenomen met de vermelding "G.H. van Rommen, Twee Pylonen, 1964, Natuursteen, Willem de Zwijgersingel". Op blz. 48 beschrijft hij het kunstwerk en noemt de maker dan "G.H. van Rommen". Maar ik denk, dat jij gelijk hebt. (Van) Rommen komt ook niet voor in het bestand van de RKD. Ik zal de bestandsnaam laten aanpassen. Met vr. groet, Gouwenaar (talk) 21:08, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dag Gouwenaar, graag gedaan en ik weet nu gelijk meer over de pylonen en een titel van een naslagwerk. Groet --Agaath (talk) 10:21, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ik vond het wel verrassend. Ik maakte de foto in Gouda in 2008. Daarna fotografeerde ik zijn werk, ruim 250 kilometer van Gouda verwijderd, in Musselkanaal. Maar ik heb de link toen niet gelegd. Ik heb mijn foto in de lijst van beelden van Gouda vervangen door de jouwe. Jouw foto is van recentere datum en ook mooier dan de indertijd door mij geplaatste afbeelding (met toen niet te vermijden hekwerk op de achtergrond). Gouwenaar (talk) 16:39, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Evert Antoon Gerard Brautigam (1922-1999) (cropped).jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 13:03, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


File:Evert Antoon Gerard Brautigam (1922-1999) en Suzanne Steigenga-Kouwe (1920-2017).jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 13:04, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Gouwenaar, ik zag je revert. Zou hier een gebruiker "rondhangen" die Hebreeuws spreekt en kan aangesproken worden om de tekst op de Grafsteen te vertalen? Lotje (talk) 04:27, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

De vertaling van die tekst is al in 2010 door een gebruiker onder ip-nummer toegevoegd aan het artikel over de Joodse begraafplaats in Veenhuizen. Ik maakte de revert omdat het gegeven dat Jetta Jacoba Niewied op de tweede dag van Rosh Hashanah werd begraven toevallig is en geen relatie heeft met die feestdag. Grafstenen van mensen die begraven zijn op 1 januari of op 1e of 2e kerstdag horen ook niet in de categorie nieuwjaarsdag, c.q. kerst geplaatst te worden. Er is immers geen relatie tussen de dag van begraven en het desbetreffende feest. Gouwenaar (talk) 12:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, bedankt, ik zal eraan denken. Lotje (talk) 14:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Gouwenaar, unfortunately I can't find this monument. Could you please either describe where exactly it is or give me its geo coordinates ? Thanks in advance, -- Ies (talk) 12:42, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This are the coordinates 52,53.3162N 7,21.4222E. Gouwenaar (talk) 13:11, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I found it. Thanks again, -- Ies (talk) 06:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:20171013 Woeste Hoeve3.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Woester Hoeve (monument) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. ツ 00:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quoted[edit]

One of your images is used in Leiden. Vysotsky (talk) 15:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I was at the right time at the right place. See also here :-) Gouwenaar (talk) 10:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]