User talk:Gamemaster669

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This is Gamemaster669’s talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Gamemaster669.
 SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days.

Kategorisierungen[edit]

Hallo, du bist ja ziemlich aktiv bei der Kategorisierung. Ich bin allerdings nicht sicher, ob da alles verstehst was du tust. Hast du Commons:Categories bzw. Commons:Kategorien gelesen? Hast du dir Gedanken darüber gemacht, in welchem Verhältnis deine Category:Rhine Valley zur Category:Rhine stehen soll? Ist dir klar, wann eine Kategorie eine Unterkategorie einer anderen sein kann? Hast du dir Gedanken über richtige Namen und sytematische Einbindung bei neu angelegten Kategorien gemacht und das evtl. mit erfahreneren Benutzern abgestimmt? Ich finde auf Anhieb soviel Murks in deinen letzten Änderungen, dass ich es kaum alles aufzählen kann. Bitte mach etwas langsamer, lies dich ein und stimme Ergänzungen mit dem vorhandenen System ab. --Sitacuisses (talk) 15:59, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, habe ich gelesen. Und ja ich weiss nicht immer ganz genau was ich tue, wer weiss das schon ? Aber ich lerne schnell. Was ich noch nicht hundert Prozentig verstanden habe ist wie die Meta-Kategorien zusammenspielen. Ich werd bestimm noch herausfinden. einige der Kategorien die ich erstell habe, werde ich in der nächsten zeit mit einer SLA versehen, sie waren nur zum testen ob was funzt oder nicht. Gamemaster669 (talk) 04:52, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Du solltest zudem beachten, dass Kategorien auf Commons in der Regel in englischer Sprache verfasst werden. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 01:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Gamemaster669, das Bild Kaplaneyhus Berneck kann in der Category:Berneck bleiben, obwohl es über die Category:Katholische Kirche Unserer Lieben Frau (Berneck) bereits in dieser drinnen ist, da das Bild ein Haus in Berneck zeigt und nicht die Kirche (zu der es aber einen gewissen Bezug gibt). Hingegen macht es keinen Sinn, dass die Kategorie Katholische Kirche Unserer Lieben Frau (Berneck) auch in der Kategorie Berneck ist, weil sie sich über die Category:Cultural properties of regional significance in Berneck bereits in der Oberkategorie Berneck befindet > vgl. Kategoriestruktur Gruss --Schofför (talk) 19:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Schofför, da möchte ich doch widersprechen, obwohl das manchmal so gehandhabt wird wie du es beschreibst. Für Gebäude gibt es jedoch gewöhnlich eine Kategorie "Buildings in ..."
Category:Cultural properties of regional significance in Berneck ist eigentlich eine Unterkategorie von "Culture of ..." und bezieht sich nicht alleine auf Gebäude. Sie sollte daher parallel zur, in dem Fall noch einzurichtenden, üblichen Gebäude-Kategorie bestehen. Gruss, --Sitacuisses (talk) 20:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So gesehen natürlich richtig und unterdessen auch erledigt. Gruss zurück --Schofför (talk) 23:50, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Gamemaster669 (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Haus zum Torggel Berneck.jpeg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Haus zum Torggel Berneck.jpeg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 18:34, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Gamemaster669 (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Littenbach zusammenfluss Fallbach Sulzbächli.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Littenbach zusammenfluss Fallbach Sulzbächli.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Gamemaster669 (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Katholische_Pfarrkirche_Unserer_Lieben_Frau_(Berneck)[edit]

Category discussion warning

Katholische Pfarrkirche Unserer Lieben Frau (Berneck) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Schofför (talk) 23:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Gamemaster669 (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Katholische Kirche Berneck Ostansicht.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Katholische Kirche Berneck Ostansicht.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 10:05, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Gamemaster669 (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

User:Beckenrandschwimmer[edit]

User:Beckenrandschwimmer is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

Userpage created by another user

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−
Please refrain from creating userpages of other users. Masum Reza📞 07:23, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schwörfinger[edit]

Hallo @Gamemaster669, ich bin dabei, deine Dateien unter dem filename Schwörfinger etc. etwas genauer zu beschreiben. Darum habe ich die Vorlage zur Beschreibung von Kunstwerken (Template:Artwork) statt der einfachen Vorlage Information gewählt. Nebst dem Ersatz der Vorlage habe ich auch mehrere Angaben korrigiert (z.B. Titel: nicht Schwörfinger, sondern Schöpfung) und vieles ergänzt (Künstler: Albert Wider), Datum des Werks usw. Das Datum der Fotografie wird nicht mehr angezeigt, ist aber berücksichtigt, wie der Quellcode zeigt. Schau dir das demnächst mal an (Datei:Widnau Sculptur Schwörfinger.jpg; Datei:Widnau Sculptur Schwörfinger Detail 1.jpg). Falls dir das nicht gefällt, kannst du es revertieren. Dann lass ich die übrigen Dateien, wie sie sind: etwas dürftig und irreführend beschrieben. Gruss Matutinho 10:17, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gamemaster669&oldid=600573037"